Hitler joins gun debate, but history is in dispute
In the months since the Newtown, Connecticut, school massacre, some gun rights supporters have repeatedly compared US gun control efforts to Nazi restrictions on firearms, arguing that limiting weapons ownership could leave Americans defenseless against homegrown tyrants. But some experts say that argument distorts a complex and contrary history. In reality, scholars say, Hitler loosened the tight gun laws that governed Germany after World War I, even as he barred Jews from owning weapons and moved to confiscate them.
Il est un fait indiscutable, qui contraste néanmoins fortement avec l’opinion populaire voulant que « le nouvel ordre mondial veut vous enlever vos armes », c’est le fait que certaines des plus importantes fortunes juives sont dans le domaine de la manufacture d’arme à feu. (Nous ne parlons pas ici du trafic d’armes qui est un autre problème en soi.) Peut-être est-il vrai qu’un certain lobby souhaiterait nous voir tous désarmés, mais toujours est-il que d’ici à ce que cela se fasse — si tant est que cela est faisable ce qui selon moi est loin d’être évident — nous pouvons être assurés que les mêmes seront là pour faire de l’argent là où et tant qu’il y aura de l’argent à faire.
Deux des plus grandes fortunes dans la manufacture d’armes à feu sont juives: les Feinberg et les Zilkha.
Le classique et légendaire COLT… est une propriété de la richissime famille Zilkha, d’un prestige égal aux fameux Rothschild et dont les racines remontent à l’antique Babylone, rien de moins!
La fiche wikipedia de Freedom Group indique qu’elle est la propriété du groupe Cerberus, un acquis des Feinberg, une autre famille juive richissime.
Voyons quelles grandes marques de renom sont offertes par le Freedom Group.
We are the world’s leading innovator, designer, manufacturer and marketer of firearms, ammunition and related products for the hunting, shooting sports, law enforcement and military markets. As one of the largest manufacturers in the world of firearms and ammunition, we have some of the most globally recognized brands including Remington®, Bushmaster® Firearms, DPMS/Panther Arms™, Marlin®, H and R®, The Parker Gun™, Mountain Khakis®, Advanced Armament Corp. ®, Dakota Arms®, Para™ USA and Barnes® Bullets. For more information download the Freedom Group Brochure.
Frank Whalen has been a hardhitting radio talk show host for the past 18 years, and has worked as a consultant for the popular men’s magazine Maxim. For more news and views from Frank Whalen—and to listen to his radio show online—please visit www.frankwhalenlive.com.
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Israeli Intrigues Linked to Gun Industry
• Powerful, shadowy Zionist holding company dominates American arms business
By Michael Collins Piper
Some AFP readers are wondering if they are on thewrong side of the issue of Zionismand Israel, a concern based on support for Israel among institutions that have been the bedrock of the American conservative movement.
This pro-Israel point of view was expressed Feb. 10 by a reader, who wrote in a letter to the editor of AFP that she was disappointed with AFP’s criticism of Israel. Warning that she has considered canceling her AFP subscription, she wrote that her Bible says, “Bless my people and I will bless you.”
As recently as Dec. 23, the John Birch Society’s New American published a commentary complaining many Americans “believe that the Jews in Israel are an ‘occupying force’ guilty of apartheid against the Palestinian people, whose land the Jews ‘stole.’ ”
And in November, the National Rifle Association (NRA) dispatched a VIP delegation to visit Israel, described in The Jerusalem Post, which reported that Joseph R. Gregory, the leader of the delegation, said, “We want to demonstrate our appreciation and support of the Israeli people because we feel that Israel is important to the U.S. and we love our country.”
The NRA bigwigs met with Israeli police and intelligence officialswho demonstrated techniques for dealingwith suspected terrorists,with the Post citing “one middle-aged female delegate” as having said, “We need to have surveillance like this back home.”
The Post noted that an Israeli spokesman revealed that Israel “had worked with the NRA in the past to share information on operations, intelligence and gun-control management.”
Some take pause in that revelation in light of what the Post did notmention: One NRA critic, Bob Cesca, has exposed the fact that while the NRA has warned against the threat of a national database of firearms or their owners, “the sort of vast, secret database the NRA often warns of already exists, despite having been assembled largely without the knowledge or consent of gun owners. It is housed in the Virginia offices of the NRA itself.”
On Aug. 22, 2013, writing on popular website “TheDailyBanter.com,” Cesca pointed out:
The country’s largest privately held database of current, former and prospective gun owners . . . has been built through years of acquiring gun permit registration lists from state and county offices, gathering names of new owners from the thousands of gun safety classes taught by NRA-certified instructors and by buying lists of attendees of gun shows, subscribers to gun magazines and more.
Cesca cited the research of Steve Freiss at the website www.BuzzFeed.com, which pointed out the National Association for Gun Rights [NAGR] has attacked the NRA for maintaining this database.
NAGR’s Dudley Brown reflected: “We know the National Security Agency is in on everything, but the fact is, so is the NRA.”
Tying this together is that while the NRA receives much of its funding fromthe gun industry, the truth is that major forces in that industry are now under the control of a single giant holding company, the Freedom Group, which The New York Times reported on Nov. 26, 2011 “is the most powerful and mysterious force in the U.S. commercial gun industry today.”
Here’s where things get interesting, in light of the NRA’s support for—and cooperation with—Israel.
The Times reported that “even within gun circles, the FreedomGroup (FG) is something of an enigma” —that “its rise has been so swift that it has become the subject of wild speculation and grassy-knoll conspiracy theories.” The Times described FG as “unrivaled in its size and reach,” noting FG controls such major arms companies as Bushmaster, Remington, Marlin, Dakota Arms and DPMS Firearms as well as firearms-relatedmanufacturers including S&K industries, the Advanced Armament Corporation and Barnes Bullets.
On Oct. 14, 2011, the NRA responded to the growing rumors about FG, asserting that “the owners and investors involved are strong supporters of the Second Amendment and are avid hunters and shooters.”
The NRA also rushed to assure that rumors that billionaire George Soros—an ardent gun-control advocate—held an interest in FG were not true and somehowmanaged to assertwith undocumented authority that he “never will.”
What the NRA didn’t mention is that FG is a subsidiary of themore gigantic Cerberus Capital Management and that the forces behind Cerberus are themselves most unsettling and—note this—intimately tied to the global operations of Israel and Zionism,withwhich the NRA has nowlinked itself in an open and enthusiastically collaborative manner.
The founder of Cerberus, billionaire Stephen Feinberg, was described by Israel’s Ha’aretz daily newspaper as “a New York Jew with a golden touch.” In 2006 Cerberus actually purchased the Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the second largest bank in Israel. The Israeli newspaper said proceeds from the purchase would go toward “paying off Israel’s high national debt.”
In fact, Cerberus is quite a powerhouse. Business Week described Cerberus as “bigger” than such giants as McDonald’s, 3M and Coca-Cola, noting Cerberus controls some 226 Burger King restaurants, the National and Alamo car rental chains, the Formica Corp. and the old Warner Studios (which, though Business Week didn’t say this, had been owned for years by different elements of the Jewish crime syndicate).
Of interest is that two major American political figures are closely associatedwith Cerberus: ex-Vice President Dan Quayle and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Feinberg’s front man, Quayle, is chairman of the board of Cerberus. According to Ha’aretz, Feinberg is a “shy wunderkind” who “makes himself scarce around photographers and sends underlings like Cerberus chair Dan Quayle to sign his deals.”
While defense secretary, Rumsfeld was an investor in Cerberus, well before the U.S. invasion of Iraq (of which Rumsfeld and the pro-Israel lobby were among the foremost advocates)—after which Cerberus profited from setting up military base camps in Iraq.
Another major player in Feinberg’s operations is Jewishwheeler-dealerMichael Steinhardt, one of the first prominent figures in the Wall Street hedge fund racket. Steinhardt has admitted he launched his career with funding from his father, Sol Frank “Red” Steinhardt, NewYork’s number one “fence” of stolen jewelry, closely associated with Jewish crime syndicate chief Meyer Lansky. Steinhardt said his father gave him envelopes stuffed with $10,000 in cash—something the average American has never seen—implying that his education at the University of Pennsylvania’s prestigious Wharton School of Business was funded by his father’s mob lucre.
Known for his devotion to Jewish causes, exemplified by his funding of the hard-line pro-Israel “neoconservative” daily newspaper, The New York Sun, now published online, Steinhardt has also been a boardmember and key financial backer of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a lobby for the global Jewish agenda. He also chaired the Democratic Leadership Council in which Bill and Hillary Clinton were prominent and chairs his own Foundation for Jewish Life aswell as Taglit Birthright Israel, funding travel to Israel by young American Jews.
What to make of all of this?
Pro-Israel forces are grabbing control of the gun industry and funding the NRA that is aligned with Israel.
And after every gun control “scare” in America—orchestrated by the media monopoly controlled by pro-Israel financial groups—the gun industry makes gigantic profits. All the while, the NRA maintains a massive database on American gun owners.
Is there a secret agenda in play? One of Israel’s most ubiquitous media advocates, Jennifer Rubin, has said that “for all intents and purposes, [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu is now the West’s protector” because Obama won’t wage war on Iran.
Will the NRA rally Americans to pick up arms to wage such a war, urging patriots into supporting another Israeli war of aggression—another step toward the New World Order? What do you think?
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats and more.
Plus de détails sur les familles Feinberg et Zilkha:
STEPHEN FEINBERG. Described by Israel’s Ha’aretz as “a New York Jew with a golden touch,” Feinberg controls the New York-based holding company Cerberus Global Investments,which, in 2006, purchased the Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the second largest bank in Israel. The Israeli newspaper said that proceeds from Feinberg’s purchase will go toward “paying off Israel’s high national debt.” In fact, Epstein’s Cerberus venture is quite substantial. The Oct. 3, 2005 issue of Business Week described Cerberus as being “bigger” than even such well known business giants as McDonald’s, 3M, Coca-Cola and Cisco Systems and noting that Cerberus controls some 226 Burger King restaurants, the National and Alamo car rental chains, building products maker Formica Corp. and the old Warner Hollywood Studios (which, incidentally, has been passed back and forth between various Jewish interests—primarily elements of outright organized crime—for several generations). Another major player in Feinberg’s operations is New York-based Jewish financier Michael Steinhardt (See MICHAEL STEINHARDT). And what is of particular interest is that two powerful American political figures are closely associated with Feinberg’s operations: former Vice President Dan Quayle and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Quayle is Feinberg’s front man, serving as chairman of the board of Cerberus, and, according to Ha’aretz, Feinberg is a “shy wunderkind” who “makes himself scarce around photographers and sends underlings like Cerberus chair Dan Quayle to sign his deals.” As far as Rumsfeld is concerned, what should disturb Americans is that Rumsfeld (while serving as defense secretary) was an investor in Epstein’s Cerberus as far back as 2001—well before the American invasion of Iraq (of which Rumsfeld was a foremost advocate), after which time Cerberus profited from setting up military base camps in Iraq.
KHEDORI ZILKHA was, for many years, the modern-day patriarch of this family of Jews who trace their origins back to Babylon.They were among the Jewish princes who reigned in Babylon and remained there after the end of their exile there. Zilkha was described by the Judeo-centric New York Sun newspaper (owned in part by Jewish crime syndicate heir, Michael Steinhardt—See MICHAEL STEINHARDT) as being “a towering figure who bestrode the financial landscape of the Middle East, Europe, America and Asia and became an important player in international banking.” Yet, how many Americans have ever heard of the Zilkha family? The dynasty is ruled today by Ezra Zilkha who said, “My family were proud members of the Jewish community that Nebuchadnezzar established. When the Babylonian captivity ended and many Jews returned to Jerusalem, my ancestors stayed behind. I am always conscious of history. My sensibilities are rooted in antiquity.” This family are among those most powerful and wealthy forces within the Rothschild Empire, loyal to their Talmudic roots and the Talmud’s dream of worldwide Jewish domination. The New York Sun has even described Ezra Zilkha himself as “a living legend.” (Michael Collins Piper, THE NEW BABYLON: THOSE WHO REIGN SUPREME, 2009, p.208, 218)
Pour aller plus loin…
Le groupe Cerberus a même acheté la part du gouvernement israélien dans la seconde plus grande banque d’Israël, la banque Leumi, qui détient des parts importantes dans le système de prisons privées aux États-Unis. (Autrement dit, le système de prisons privées aux USA est contrôlé en grande partie par les Israéliens, ces modèles de vertus!) Leumi se trouve ainsi lié à un segment des Républicains depuis que la part du gouvernement israélien dans la banque Leumi a été rachetée en 2008 par Cerberus, alors dirigé par l’ancien vice président Républicain Dan Quayle.
« (…) the second biggest bank in Israel, Bank Leumi—owned in part by the government of Israel itself—held a controlling interest in one of the big « American » corporations that reap vast profits by operating private prisons in the United States where thousands work at slave-labor wages while serving out their penal terms. This came even while Israel was outlawing private prisons on is own soil. (…) none of the many opponents of the private prison industries in America Jumped on the fact that Republican Vice President Dan Quayle, in fact, was chairman of the board of the Cerberus Global Investments, the New York-based holding company which, in 2008, purchased the Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the Israeli bank that held the controlling interest in the « American » company operating private prisons in America. (…) Israelis are essentially in charge of maintaining a substantial control over America’s penal system—and of a growing number of penal systems throughout the world where Israeli-owned companies are agressively engaged in setting up private prison systems (…) » (Michael Collins Piper, CONFESSIONS OF AN ANTI-SEMITE, 2011, p.348-349)
One of my readers found the following letter to the editor, in an old NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE newspaper dated March 1, 1936, concerning fearmongering about German rearmament. The reader was kind enough to type it out and to sent it to me, and so I am pleased to share it here, along with a few of my own comments and some related links below.
REARMING OF GERMANY Forced on Her by Her Neighbors
To the NY Herald Tribune: In his article “Can Europe Escape War?” appearing in your Sunday editorial page, Captain Cazalet, M.P., rightly places the factor of German power in the center of his reasoning. For, from all but total destruction wrought upon the central powers by the Versailles treaty, Germany alone has slowly but firmly been able to rise within the last 17 years toward the level of armed force established and maintained by her former victors. This, naturally more than anything else, upset the none too judicious calculations of the Versailles peace makers, moving at the same time Germany into the focus of world attention.
Oblivious of the blunders of the peace table, the successors of the men of Versailles are now watching in pained surprise Germany’s rebirth of power. Their keen disappointment at the Versailles failure would perhaps find reasoned solace in the admission of the truism that a living organism such as the German nation ill by nature continue to function and not stop short in order to oblige mistaken conceptions of some of the Versailles statesmen.
Surrounded by nations armed to the teeth and aggressively talking of peace, is it any wonder that Germany would feel uneasy until armed in like manner?
Versailles had forced her to set the good example of disarming, but her tutors in peace, breaking their pledge, refused to follow it. For what object did they keep and increase their armaments contrary to their word? Germany, having no means of defending her country, naturally felt the constant menace of having her lands turned into a European battlefield, should the occasion arise.
To await passively such holocaust would have been worse than criminal negligence on the part of her statesmen. As all negotiations for disarmament led to nothing, there was only one way Germany could meet this menace: take a leaf from the book of her former enemies and rearm sufficiently to insure safety for herself.
Considering this side of the question, which is, after all, not the least important, one is rather disappointed at the somewhat irritated and biased tone with which Captain Cazalet speaks of Germany’s rearmament in his otherwise singularly objective article.
Author: R. BOECKLIN, Litchfield Conn, date: Feb 17, 1936
ny-herald-tribune-03-01-1936.pdf (full page)
ny-herald-tribune-03-01-1936b.jpg (article only)
Thanks to the person who took the time to share this with me. I found it very interesting that this writer of the letter used the term “holocaust” in 1936, and that he was not referring to Jews either, but rather, of what might happen to Germans at the hands of the allies. It was really quite prophetic, in light of what eventually happened to Germany in WWII. There was actually a “Justice for Germans” movement of sorts in the 1920s / 30s who were the voices of reason, but these were drowned out by the more bellicose warmongers and often labelled as “appeasers” or as “unpatriotic”, especially in the late 30s. And, sadly, the same thing still happens today too, and so I cannot emphasize enough how imperative it is for those in the “truth movement”, the “peace movement” and for the world at large to finally learn the full and true history regarding Hitler, National Socialism and World War II.
In Defence of Germany, by G.E.O. Knight (1934)
The Case for Germany – A Study of Modern Germany (1939)
By Arthur Pillans Laurie, M.A.Cantab., D.Sc., LL.D.Edin., F.C.S, F.R.S.E.
With a Preface by Admiral Sir Barry Domvile, K.B.E., C.M.G.
The Peacemakers (based upon the work of Michael Walsh, and which I expanded upon)
Hitler: An Overlooked Candidate for The Peace Prize, by Alex S. Perry, Jr.
Désinformation, diversion, ingénierie sociale… voilà ce qui tuera le mouvement de vérité!
« Si demain, un Breivik « français de souche », nourri des textes antisémites ultra-catholiques ou néo-païens énumérés ci-dessus, se prend pour le sauveur de la civilisation blanche et/ou chrétienne et fait un carnage, il ne faudra pas dire que nous ne savions pas. » (Tarek Sandal, du site de repères antiracistes)
Ce sera le chrétien européen qui servira de bouc émissaire de tout ce lavage de cerveau conspirationniste et inférioriste blanc (c-à-d proclamant la fin du monde blanc). Ce sera lui qui sera tenu responsable, sûrement pas les juifs qui nous aurons tous menés à la catastrophe!
À propos du conspirationnisme nuisible, qui évite de trop insister sur l’identité des commanditaires du crime, en focalisant par exemple sur des détails techniques (appelés « incohérences de la version officielle »), se propageant partout et très rapidement sur le Net, polluant, intoxiquant le mouvement de vérité. C’est comme ça que les contrôleurs de l’info peuvent continuer à contrôler l’info à l’intérieur du mouvement de vérité et ce, tout en faisant passer le mouvement de vérité pour des gens crédules et stupides (ex: théorie des « acteurs de crise » à Boston et Sandy Hook, théorie « aucun avion au WTC« ), voire même potentiellement dangereux (ex: Tsarnaev-Boston, etc.), ça ils adorent! N’oublions pas qu’ils sont déjà prêts à nous désigner comme coupables et boucs émissaires de leurs propres machinations:
« Si demain, un Breivik « français de souche », nourri des textes antisémites ultra-catholiques ou néo-païens énumérés ci-dessus, se prend pour le sauveur de la civilisation blanche et/ou chrétienne et fait un carnage, il ne faudra pas dire que nous ne savions pas. » (Tarek Sandal, du site de repères antiracistes)
Les vrais « acteurs de crise » dans cette histoire, ce sont les professionnels en gestion de crise et en ingénierie sociale qui ont lancé ces rumeurs-intox telles que ces théories sur les « acteurs de crise » à Boston et Sandy Hook, afin de porter atteinte à la crédibilité mouvement de vérité…
VIDEO – Guillaume Weill-Raynal – La théorie du complot La théorie du complot fabriquée ou instrumentalisée comme piège, pour fins de manipulation des masses… La théorie du complot est une caricature d’esprit critique destiné à disqualifier tout esprit critique. C’est l’épouvantail utilisé pour disqualifier et discréditer les critiques sérieuses.
Guillaume Weill-Raynal : conspiration dans la conspiration
Par Rudy Reichstadt
Il y a la théorie du complot du 11-Septembre, développée par Thierry Meyssan : « aucun avion ne s’est écrasé sur le Pentagone ». Il y a aussi la théorie du complot de la théorie du complot : « Thierry Meyssan est un épouvantail fabriqué de toute pièce par les partisans de la guerre en Irak, visant à discréditer leurs adversaires et, plus généralement, ceux qui critiquent l’ordre établi ».
Ces quelques mots résument la thèse développée – pardon, l’hypothèse « soulevée » – par Guillaume Weill-Raynal, dès 2007, dans un livre demeuré, à son grand dam, confidentiel (Les Nouveaux Désinformateurs, éditions Armand Colin, 2007). Compte tenu du silence assourdissant qui a entouré la publication de son ouvrage (le livre a tout de même été recensé par Oumma.com, dont le texte a été repris sur le site d’extrême droite La Banlieue s’exprime), on était fondé à penser que Guillaume Weill-Raynal en resterait là. Qu’il ne persisterait pas à essayer de se couvrir de ridicule. Notre plumitif en mal de notoriété a toutefois choisi de récidiver, cette semaine, sur le site de Bakchich.info :
The Piper Report Aug 26, 2013
The sloppy ‘research’ done by so many in the ‘truth movement’ and how it is utilized by our enemies against us.
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
FLASHBACK: Jonathan Kay: Bringing paranoia to the digital masses
Book Excerpt: Among the Truthers by Jonathan Kay
The Internet has produced a radical democratization of the conspiracist marketplace of ideas. No longer does one have to spend years researching and writing a book to attract attention: One can simply set up a blog, or chime in on someone else’s, with some refinement of the existing collective lore. In fact, today’s conspiracists don’t even have to read books — they can pick up all their talking points from Truther websites, or, better yet, from Truther propaganda videos. (…)
This dumbing-down effect explains the downward shift in the age profile of conspiracists: While influential JFK conspiracy theorists tended to be bookish middle-aged eccentrics, many of the Internet’s noisiest Truthers are barely old enough to shave: Conspiracism is something they fit in between video gaming and Facebook surfing.
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
. Latest study: Gun bans result in more murders
By Michael Collins Piper
Defenders of the Second Amendment are again standing up to counter an ongoing propaganda campaign advocating new gun control legislation.
In connection with the first anniversary of the Sandy Hook incident-20 children and six adults were reportedly shot dead-the mass media predictably unleashed another torrent of hype agitating for more measures to curtail firearm ownership.
However, thanks to serious, fact-based research and articulate enunciation of the data, voices such as John Lott at the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) have been forceful opponents of the gun grabbers.
Lott slapped down gun grabbers with a recent documented report demonstrating that « every place that guns have been banned, murder rates have gone up, » noting that « you cannot point to one place where [the murder rate] has fallen [after guns have been banned] whether it’s Chicago or D.C. or even island nations such as England, Jamaica or Ireland. »
After the British ban in 1997, there was roughly a 50% increase in homicide rates and, although that spike has since subsided, the homicide rate in England still remains higher than it was immediately prior to the ban.
Average Americans undecided on the gun issue are not convinced to oppose gun control by Internet rumors that « no kids died at Sandy Hook, » or that « crisis actors » posed as parents of children who died. Instead, the kind of hard data and logical arguments-utilized by Lott and other strategically focused opponents of gun control-resonate with average, commonsense Americans.
While Barack Obama’s so-called grassroots political machine-Organizing for Action (OFA)-has pushed, in particular, for expanded background checks on those who purchase firearms at gun shows or online, Lott notes that background checks being pushed by OFA would not have prevented the Sandy Hook tragedy.
In fact, Lott noted, the weapons allegedly used by the gunman, Adam Lanza, had been legally purchased by his mother and-even under the terms of an Obama-supported gun control bill in the Senate-those purchases still would be legal.
The media tries to stampede people into supporting the evisceration of the Second Amendment, but effective defenders of the right to keep and bear arms target the core issue and don’t get sidetracked.
That’s why AFP is proud to support those who take a strong stand on this important matter.
Man fired for saying elementary school shooter was brainwashed:
No Free Speech for Conspiracy Theorist
By Keith Johnson
Of all the rights enshrined in the Constitution, freedom of speech is arguably the most cher ished. Should that freedom, however, shield someone who works with children from losing their job if they write something controversial on the Internet?
That’s one of the questions surrounding the case of Adam Heller, a high school English teacher from Bedford, N.Y.,whose online rants triggered a series of events that brought an early end to his teaching career.
Heller’s troubles began early in 2013 in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre of Dec. 14, 2012. After striking up an online friendship with another individual, the two began exchanging a series of messages. It was during this time that Heller told the other person that he believed the U.S. government had programmed Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza into carrying out his murderous attacks and that those responsible “should be killed.”
These private online messages eventually made theirway to the FBI,which then placed the 35-year old teacher under surveillance.
Upon learning that Heller was missing work and had recently come into possession of three firearms, an FBI profiler instructed a team of local, state and federal law enforcement officials to move in.
“[The FBI profiler] stated that it was her belief that he was following a typical pattern for potential shooters, and that he now had acquired weapons and completed that next step in that pattern,” Pound Ridge Police Chief David Ryan testified at a hearing on the case. “And although he had not specifically identified a target, we should engage him immediately, before he does.”
Over a period of about six months, Heller, who had never been convicted of a crime in the past, was passed from police custody to a mental institution and finally to a disciplinary hearing. From there, the tenured educator was terminated from his school district after a tribunal deemed him “mentally ill” and determined that his continued employment would “create an undue risk to the safety of the students and faculty.”
In an effort to learn Heller’s side of the story, this AMERICAN FREE PRESS reporter spoke with his attorney, Michael Sussman, a Harvard-trained constitutional and civil rights lawyer.
When asked how the FBI came into possession of Heller’s communications, Sussman replied: “This could have very well been intercepted by the NSA.
My own feeling is that AdamHeller is probably one of the victims of the surveillance that we’ve all come to learn about. I don’t believe the other party of that conversation went to the FBI. I think they picked up on certain buzz words, which is a very imposing and dangerous proposition.”
Sussman went on to say that his client’s unconventional, anti-establishment viewswere not unlike the concerns many Americans share and suggests that Heller might not have attracted the attention of law enforcement had it not been for the heightened sensitivities about recent school shootings.
“Tome, this is a case of profound over-reaction,” said Sussman. “We’ve had periods in American history where there has been great hysteria about things. Logic and common sense are the casualties of that hysteria. Here, we have [law enforcement] concluding that Adam is a danger based on a conjunction of events where Adam is buying weapons and expressing concerns about the government’s official version of events at Newtown, which is only 45 minutes away.”
Although Heller apparently admits writing that certain people “should be killed,” Sussman insists those words have been taken completely out of context.
“It was a rhetorical statement, not one of intent,” he said. “I think in everyday life people use rhetoric to dramatize their dislike for someone or some situation.
These might be considered terrible words, but a person isn’t normally doing anything more than venting and using the language to express their emotions.”
Unfortunately for Heller, the school district did not see it the same way. Though he agreed to undergo psychiatric evaluation, his attending psychiatrist accused him of making false statements and failing to cooperate, which ultimately led to his termination.
Sussman maintains that Heller was cooperative and has filed a federal lawsuit in an attempt to have the school district’s decision reversed.
“I find the situation worse than outrageous,” said Sussman. “My view is that Adam engaged in protected speech and conduct. The psychiatrist testified, and his report also reflects, that he could not conclude that Heller was a danger to anyone. It was clear law enforcement was pressuring the school district to keep Heller out.”
When asked if Heller’s rights really should take precedence over a school district’s responsibility to keep children safe from any potential threat, Sussman replied: “In the period since this has been made public, many of the students and families in that community have rallied to Adam’s defense. But even if they didn’t, we still have to abide by basic constitutional principles. Ifwe start making exceptions based on fear and speculation, we begin to erode those principles and will eventually lose them altogether.”
Keith Johnson is a writer based out of Memphis, Tennessee. He can be reached at [email protected]
Conspiracies Swirl Around Sandy Hook
Tragic mass murder in Connecticut spawns multiple conflicting conspiracy theories
Michael Collins Piper
For many years, but especially since the advent of the Internet, responsible truthseekers and independent news sources like AMERICAN FREE PRESS have been bedeviled—besieged—by outrageous disinformation confusing honest efforts to bring forth important facts about history and the issues and events of the day. We find an extraordinary array of irresponsible sources spinning some outlandish claims—conspiracy theories, if you will—that confuse matters further. And this is not to suggest conspiracies don’t exist at the highest and lowest levels.
In fact, over the years, critics have slammed AMERICAN FREE PRESS for allegedly promoting “conspiracy theories” when all we have done is report the facts, however uncomfortable they may be for some very real conspirators.
Unfortunately, many of the foolish conspiracy theories circulating today arise because those who are looking for conspiracies have a tendency to base their conclusions on what is just downright sloppy and inaccurate reporting by the “mainstream” media in the first place.
Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.,
where a mass shooting of children and school emplo-
yees took place on Dec. 14, 2012, is now the subject
of raucous debate among conspiracy theorists.
The big media has never been a good source for anything of critical substance, but still, in this day of 24-seven “news” coverage—making current events a variation of “reality” television—bad reporting and otherwise honest mistakes by establishment news sources, often made in the heat of the moment, are suddenly the subject of frenzied speculation. They are then turned into something they are not: the foundation for conspiracy theories purporting to explain “what really happened” regarding some event gripping the public mind.
Right now there are widely circulated claims that no children were killed at Sandy Hook, that it’s all a hoax. Others say that local police and firemen were in on the shooting, working to ensure as many kids as possible were gunned down. Others insist it was a CIA “mind control” operation. They claim the alleged shooter was brainwashed into being the “patsy” and that other gunmen carried out the murders—the same ones other conspiracy theorists say didn’t even happen at all.
And yes, the CIA does engage in mind control.
This writer’s book, The Judas Goats,* has a whole chapter on the topic. So don’t say I’m denying the existence of mind control.
One conspiracymonger claimed Israel’s Mossad orchestrated Sandy Hook in order to hurt Barack Obama. Yes, he said that.
Others—who don’t like Obama—said that, yes, the Mossad did it, but left out the part that the shooting was designed to hurt the president.
So, depending on what you think of Obama, you have two different versions of that theory. But there’s no proof ofMossad involvement in this case.
And before accusing me of “covering up for the Mossad,” bear in mind I have publicly charged the Mossad with being behind the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 attacks.
Time and time again it’s been discovered that many mass shooters have been on mind-bending psychiatric drugs. Frankly, if I were the head of one of the companies that produce such drugs, I would keep a “crisis team” ready for action every time there’s a shooting. My Internet trolls would be out there cranking out stories saying “the CIA” brainwashed the shooters, thereby misdirecting attention from what could be the real underlying cause. There’s a conspiracy theory to chew on.
AFP tries to stick to what we believe to be the facts and we won’t publish any story because “it sounds good” or because somebody thinks “there might be something to it.”
*Michael Collins Piper is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia,Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of a dozen books sold by AFP. Order any of these books toll free at 1-888-699-6397
Many Sandy Hook Rumors Have Mysterious Origins
• Aftermath of mad news scramble leaves many doubting official story
By Michael Collins Piper
For American Free Press
Agrowing number of people in what iscalled the “truth movement” are becominguneasy with the proliferation ofoften-bizarre conspiracy theories surroundingthe Sandy Hook shooting affair that havepopped up, non-stop, on an almost daily basis.
Cautious observers are convinced high-level intriguers deliberately inserted many of these nonsensicaltheories into public discussionfor the very purpose of discreditingalternative theories relatingto other very real conspiracies.
Upon learning, for example,that some “conspiracy theorists”believe Sandy Hook was a hoaxand that no children were evenkilled there—a frequent refrain—many in the general public are now dismissing any and all serious discussion of suchmatters as the 9-11 cover-up, the OKC bombing, theJFK assassination, or even the attack on the USSLiberty as the ravings of “conspiracy theorists.”
Attempts to examine those other very real conspiraciesare now being routinely greeted withsuch comments as: “ I suppose you’re also one ofthose who people who doesn’t believe those 20 littlechildren were killed at Sandy Hook.”
It seems as though the truthmovement has beenmaliciously manipulated into repeating any and allSandy Hook conspiracy theories as part of some insidiouslycrafted experiment in crowd psychology—a carefully calculated operation designed tomonitor Internet contact between patriots, keepingan eye on “who contacts whom” and determiningwhich sources are most effective in spreading information,or disinformation, as the case may be.
Precisely because so much disinformation wasbeing spread unwittingly by well-meaning and entirelyinnocent folks, a lot of people concluded thatsomething had to be amiss with the “official”Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—somany good patriots wouldn’t beraising questions.
And that brings us to a very realquestion: How many of those whohave been “raising questions” arereally “good patriots”?
The truth is that a vast majorityof the Sandy Hook spin has comefromheretofore unknown sources,who still remain largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames, and whohelped put out much of the material early on,adding their own often-dubious commentary thathelped stir up suspicion in the first place.
The behind-the-scenes powers-that-be haveclearly concluded that the Internet is a powerfulmechanism to control the course of debate withinpatriot ranks and have found that mixing mattersup by spreading unfounded and often silly rumorsis the best way to dilute serious inquiry. And basedupon what we’ve seen in the wake of Sandy Hook,this very real conspiracy seems to be succeeding—all too well.
And what is so cunning is that the real conspiratorshave utilized Sandy Hook to drive a deepwedge that’s split the patriot movement fromwithin. Veteran patriots say they’ve never seen anythinglike it in all their long years.
children at Sandy Hook Elementary
Thanks to the Orwellian manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief inSandy Hook as having been a massive hoax is essentiallybeing instituted as a virtual litmus test as to “who’s a real patriot and who isn’t.”
Those who don’t believe Sandy Hook was amassivehoax are denounced as having been “bribed,blackmailed, or coerced” or just having simply“changed sides.”
In short, Sandy Hook has effectively emerged asa cult, with a built-in theology that cannot be questioned.
To raise any doubts about the foundation ofthe cult is considered heresy. And anyone whodoubts the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories is beingportrayed as a “traitor to the patriot movement.”
One longtime critic of gun control was accusedof lending support to pro-gun control forces because he believed children were killed at SandyHook—a total disconnect, of course, but illustrativeof the kind of mindset that is setting in place.
Another was accused of being “pro-Obama” because he doubted the Sandy Hook theories.
It’s almost like Alice in Wonderland.
If there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’sthis: There’s more to Sandy Hook than even themost dedicated conspiracy theorists understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, theUnited States.
American Free Press
Internet Rife With Disinformation
• “ Cyber shills” working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers
BEHIND THE SCENES
Michael Collins Piper
Evidence suggests patriots and truthseekers are being subjected to insidious means of mind control—and crowd control—through a covert campaign now being orchestrated across the Internet.
Over the past nearly two decades, every time some horrific “event” happens, wanna-be “journalists” come out of the woodwork with their conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing; bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank speculation. [These are] irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or to get people to their websites. They have zero credibility and hurt the rest of us by being lumped together [with us]. I have debunked conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I’m the bad guy for pursuing the truth. There are conspiracies and cover-ups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
That’s why, in 2008, University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein—a Barack Obama crony—issued a formal crisis management paper on “conspiracy theories,” outlining a proposed pro- gram of what he called “cognitive infiltration” to discredit such theories, particularly those implicating Israel in 9-11.
And while such “Judas goat” operations have been going on for years, involving, for example, the FBI’s infamous ADL-assisted COINTELPRO—targeting the Ku Klux Klan, the National States Rights Party, the Minutemen and other dissidents—we know of one current Internet-focused scheme exposed by Thorn in AFP. Reporting that the Israeli government pays young Israelis $2,000 a month to troll the Internet and spread disinformation, Thorn noted that this connivance is well coordinated:
Participants are provided with specific scripts to use on enemies, complete with details involving sensationalized accusations against enemies, divide-and-conquer strategies where one individual is pitted against another, plus a variety of distraction techniques and the marginalization of opinions that differ from the official Jewish party line. Other tactics include denying inconvenient facts, refusing dialogue by sending conversations off into absurd directions, or dishonestly manip- ulating sources to entrap a foe.
VIDEO – How Disinformation Becomes HistoryAUDIO – SPINGOLA SPEAKS with guest Keith Johnson Feb 5 2014
Deanna’s guest today was Keith Johnson, a journalist at American Free Press. They discuss Sandy Hook conspiracy theories. Jim Fetzer calls in. (MP3)
VIDEO – THE PIPER REPORT: MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER AND MARK GLENN ON SANDY HOOK
AFP RADIO – Date with a Debate: Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend
AFP Radio Network
Download Default player New Window Embed
Dave Gahary moderates a debate between Mike Piper vs. Jim Fetzer and John Friend, who tackle the controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event.
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at U of M Duluth, and an authority on the JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen. Wellstone’s death.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, « The Real Deal« , M/W/F
John Friend is a writer who maintains a blog and hosts “The Realist Report.”
note from MCP–
I return for a 2 hour exposition on ‘Fetzerism,’ beginning with a complete run-down of the debate history and of Jim Fetzer’s “pilpulism” regarding my purported health hoax (or hoaxes).
I have included even a quote from Pete Papaherakles regarding Fetzer’s smears of AFP being an “op” and even one from Willis Carto (who laughed at the opportunity to say something, really giving Fetzer Hell.)
Wonder what this Fetzer Freak will have to say about that?
I contacted both Pete and Willis before the broadcast (which was pre-recorded) and got their quotations with their full knowledge that I would be quoting them on the broadcast.
All credit is due Pete in taking on Dr. Fetzer and rejecting his claim that AFP is an “op.”
Let’s have a “here here” for Pete.
I hope John Tiffany will sing out in approval.
I’m very sorry that John Friend’s “friendship” appears to be in doubt, further feeding fuel to a lot of fires that he’s already set all over the “truth” and “white nationalist” movement(s).
When Julia Foster and John Tiffany and I started to work for The SPOTLIGHT we underwent lie detector tests (I went the the sophisticated voice stress analysis kind; I think Julie and John underwent the old fashioned kind). I’m starting to think perhaps we need to re-institute that. (The tests really make you think that you are a bad ass and make you doubt yourself! I don’t suggest them as pleasurable prospects for anybody. But I sure would be curious to see what would come out of a test of John Friend!)
I also spent a few minutes giving an overview of how much Fetzer’s so-called “contribution” to the JFK debate is really just a compilation of the work of others . . . Fetzer was a fraud from the start.
Have fun listening. Consider all the crap you people have listened to (or, pardon me, even engaged in) regarding Sandy Hook, it might not hurt for you to take two hours and 20 minutes and listen to MY crap. You might even hear something you haven’t already heard or it might clarify something you’d never thought of before.
I’m not too vulgar—a few god damns here and there, but not in a loud Fetzer-style way—and I must surely, at least, invite someone to go to Hell (although I wouldn’t swear to that).
Big Heart (MCP)
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
Deanna Spingola on Sandy Hook, psychiatric drugs, and false hoaxes
January 17, 2014
32k CF Download
32k CF Download
ONE AGAIN, the Sandy Hook Conspiracy theory madness and the dangers it poses to the credibility of the 9/11 truth movement. Download Here
Bush-Hitler Myth, Sandy Hook, etc.Download Here
Michael discuses various topics such as, Sandy Hook massacre conspiracy theories, the sinking of the Titanic, the relationship between Jews and Hitler, and more…
32k CF Download
Michael talks about the phony left-right debate. Both political parties continue to push the Jewish agenda; in part gun control. Also discusses is Obamaism or the publics obsession with Obama. 32k CF Download
Current Issues, with Hesham Tillawi
Playlist Files: PLS M3U
Hesham invites Mike Piper, Mark Glenn, and James Fitzer onto the show to discuss the controversy of conspiracy surrounding the Sandy Hook massacre.
Playlist Files: PLS M3U
Hesham address the controversy sparked from last weeks show.
Playlist Files: PLS M3U
Hesham talks with Mark Glen about Sandy Hook, the Arab Spring, and women being in full fledged military combat.
Keith Johnson, an investigative journalist, radio talk show host and editor of Revolt of the Plebs, has for 17 years worked as a private investigator and polygraph examiner for several Fortune 500 companies and prominent law firms.
James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.
McKnight Professor Emeritus at U of M Duluth, he has conducted research into the JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen. Wellstone’s death.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, « The Real Deal« , M/W/F Debate-page
Deanna talked about her ongoing research into the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting and her critique of the video presentation given by Sophia Smallstorm regarding what may or may not have happened in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. (MP3)
Related: Notes and Resources for the Sandy Hook Shootings
Unraveling Sofia Smallstorm’s Video on Sandy Hook, Part 1, Part 2
Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills Fetzer is the ringleader of the disinformation agents who present as lunatics, and by a process of elimination, it can be seen that Fetzer is a principal player in Cass Sunstein’s cognitive infiltration operations.
The esteemed Professor Fetzer correctly states that it is necessary to revise hypotheses in the light of new evidence. But what « evidence »? Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and he has never presented any evidence against the official Sandy Hook narrative. A few reporting errors, glitches with Google’s date logs, attempts at practising psychiatry without a license, and unsubstantiated, unbridled speculation that makes Inspector Clouseau look the consummate professional, does not constitute evidence.
For example, an article entitled « Sandy Hook: The curious case of Emilie Parker » was posted on January 14, 2013 by « Dr. Eowyn ». But the comment by « Rich in NJ » on that page [i] is dated December 14, 2012 – a month before the article was posted!
Anyone who watches this video [ii] of Benjamin Wheeler’s parents and sincerely thinks they are « faking » their distress is obviously suffering from some sort of autistic spectrum disorder. Have Fetzer and Friend actually seen it? It’s bad enough that these people must reveal their grief to the world as they fill in for Obama’s weekly address, but to have Sunstein shills (who lie and pose as retards and cranks in order to prop up the official 9/11 conspiracy theory) accusing them of faking it is beyond the pale.
Ben Wheeler’s uncle Andrew « Drew » Wheeler [iii] is a scuba dive instructor and underwater videographer [iv] from Hawaii. He has a website for which the domain was created in April 2003 [v], and messages about him posted on an internet forum in 2009 [vi] refer to his plans to document the Great Pacific garbage patch (aka « Pacific trash vortex ») that summer.
The Sandy Hookers should state which of the following they believe:
- Andrew Wheeler is a fictitious person, but in order to make his online presence appear realistic, Sandy Hook Hoaxers created his website’s domain in April 2003, had other conspirators post about him on internet forums – e.g., in 2009, obtained a photograph of a person to use on his website, and tricked or persuaded various newspapers into using another photo of the same person in reports stating that he traveled to Connecticut in December 2012.
- Although Andrew Wheeler loves his island lifestyle, he was inexplicably recruited as a « crisis actor », a job that involved him traveling from Hawaii to Connecticut to pose as the uncle of one of the « fake » victims, as part of an operation to back up a false Sandy Hook narrative.
- A « crisis actor » resembling Andrew Wheeler was hired to travel to Sandy Hook and pose as Wheeler, with backup plans to shoot or otherwise eliminate the real Andrew Wheeler if he ever found out about it and talked, and a second backup plan to shoot anyone who found out that Wheeler had been killed, and a third backup plan to shoot Wheeler’s killer if he talked, and so on, with another series of backup plans to shoot the « crisis actor » if he talked, along with thousands of conspirators bribing, blackmailing and threatening thousands of co-conspirators to play their part in the plot.
And whichever the Sandy Hooker selects, he or she must provide evidence to prove it. Otherwise, the Sandy Hook « hoax » theories can be consigned to the garbage bin, for once and for all.
Fetzer « knows » that the children’s deaths were « faked » (after claiming they were killed by a three-man Mossad hit team!), yet he and his team of ‘researchers’ don’t know whether their relatives actually exist. Shouldn’t Fetzer and friends first determine whether or not the bereaved family members exist, before declaring that they are willing participants in a money-making fraud or are simply roles played by crisis actors?
How long will it be before Fetzer and friends assert that no one died on 9/11/01 and the WTC buildings never collapsed? The difference between that and their current position of no-planes-on-9/11 and no-one-killed-at-Sandy-Hook is less than the width of a cigarette paper.
Real conspiracies do occur. Israel’s central role in 9/11 can be proven to the same certainty as two plus two equals four [vii], and there is no doubt that Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, and the Mossad has carried out plenty of false-flag terror attacks such as London 7/7/05 and Amman 11/9/05. Similarly, the official account of WWII is not consistent with the laws of thermodynamics, thermochemistry, and ultimately probability. As long as Sunstein shills and their misguided followers post outrageous conspiracy theories that anyone with an ounce of commonsense will instantly recognize as crazy, genuine research into conspiracies will be discredited by association.
Jim Fetzer, who was already known to be operating a « campaign of disinformation » in July 2001, was the ideal person, with his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems, to head Sunstein’s team of shills, designed to make truth-seekers look crazy by the team’s cognitive infiltration of patriot groups and posing as « nuts » with a « crippled » epistemology.
Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills
Update (February 21, 2014): Wolfgang Halbig busted as a Jewish internet activist
In an article Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax by Dr. Fetzer et al, the Fetzerians exhibit an uncharacteristic flash of logic with statements about « the totality of the evidence » and the probability of hypotheses. For example, « The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has ‘settled down,’ is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science ».
Here are the « top ten » reasons that support the conclusion that the leading proponents of Sandy Hook hoax / no-plane ‘theories’ are Sunstein shills.
1) The Sandy Hook hoax theorists (Sandy Hookers) promote outrageous claims such as 28 deaths were faked, 20 children must pretend to be dead for the rest of their lives, some of these children attended the Super Bowl by mistake instead of playing dead, dozens or hundreds of crisis actors were hired to play the part of bereaved family members, the mass killings were merely part of a drill, and there was foreknowledge of the « drill ». Their ‘evidence’ consists of the opinions of some YouTube commentators who think the relatives should be shedding more tears, or shouldn’t give a nervous laugh when preparing to face the cameras. Or some internet ‘detectives’ spot a few glitches with Google’s date logs, and cite it as ‘proof’ that dastardly Sandy Hook conspirators slipped up and made an error that only these latter-day Sherlocks were clever enough to spot.
If the events at Sandy Hook were a result of government chicanery, such as an exploitation of Adam Lanza’s « significant mental health issues« , then the investigation has been derailed by the Sandy Hookers’ mass circulation of outlandish claims about faked deaths, fake family members and a fake killer. Unsurprisingly, the fakery claims have been robustly refuted.
And whilst denying the abundance of evidence supporting the official Sandy Hook narrative as broadly correct, the Sandy Hookers are frequently found trying to sell other preposterous conspiracy claims such as no-planes-hit-the-World-Trade-Center, WTC-was-nuked, space-beam-weapon-zapped-WTC, and Boston-bomb-amputees-faked-injuries. For example, Jim Fetzer is a no-planer and claims mini-nukes demolished the WTC. Disinformation brokers such as Fetzer, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Simon Shack, Max Konrardy, Morgan Reynolds, John Lear, Dave Shayler, John Friend and Judy Wood have skills such as writing, video production, flying and spying, and at least four of them qualified as professors (as did Cass Sunstein). One professor becoming senile and postulating crackpot hypotheses about space-based beam weapons, faked planes or faked deaths could be considered unlucky, two a coincidence, but three or four is a conspiracy.
Members of the general public who take a casual look at « conspiracy theories » will encounter the lunatic claims of these professors, and will conclude that if no-planers, mini-nukers and Sandy Hook / Boston bombings deniers are indicative of the truth movement’s finest brains, then there is no need for further investigation and no need to doubt the government account of events such as 9/11.
Similarly, when dozens of people have skills in writing, video production, flying, spying, etc., demonstrating that they are not retards or lunatics, and these people are promoting ideas that are so at odds with the evidence that only retards or lunatics could possibly subscribe to them, then there is a contradiction that is resolved only by assuming that these people are liars who pretend to be crazy. There is not only no evidence that no planes hit the WTC, or that the Sandy Hook deaths were « faked »; there is also no credible motive for anyone to believe such ridiculous ideas. There are, however, powerful motives for them to lie: tribal loyalty, bribery, blackmail, bullying, and a misguided belief that they are being patriotic by serving as government assets who counter « conspiracy theorists » by infiltrating truth-seeking circles and acting as if they believe the most outrageous bovine excrement.
2) A professor who is an « expert » in « critical thinking » – as he’s been telling everyone for decades – should surely comprehend that it’s much easier for perpetrators of false-flag terror to crash a Boeing into a building (especially with Dov Zakheim and Daniel Lewin on the team) rather than have to fake it with phony videos or invisible, inaudible aircraft capable of projecting Fetzer’s postulated « sophisticated hologram[s] » to fool hundreds or thousands of eyewitnesses into imagining they saw a plane or planes crashing into the WTC, and to fool billions who would later see the footage, and planting of assorted physical evidence without anyone seeing or hearing the fakers. This evidence includes a 255-pound piece of wreckage « later identified as a trailing edge flap support structure from a Boeing 767″, with it needing to be wedged between an apartment building and a mosque, to be finally removed twelve years later in 2013 in a two-hour operation using a pulley system, a fuselage fragment on the roof of WTC5, landing gear at the corner of West and Rector Streets and also in an exterior panel knocked free from WTC1, aircraft parts embedded in the back of a car, and an American Airlines plane seat and life vest at the roof level of 130 Liberty Plaza (Deutsche Bank Building). And the fakers would need to create impact holes in the WTC facade matching the silhouette of a Boeing 767 by using cleverly placed shaped charges, guaranteed to detonate at the right instant. The probability of being able to blow out the correct shape is about zero.
Even if you try to imagine a « parallel world » in which Fetzer is telling the truth and the WTC planes were faked, the problem is that it requires a population that is so dumbed-down and a government that is so competent and technically proficient, that the government would be able to exploit and enslave the citizens as they pleased without having to go to all the trouble of faking planes and staging false-flag terror. Just round them up, give them some pills and put them in labor camps, they get all the water they need (as per the Guantanamo Bay prisoners), rations as long as they perform their work, and tell them it’s perfectly normal and even desirable. The population would need to be so stupid as to fail to see or hear « hologram-projector » planes flying away, or fail to understand that it discredits the official story. And they would have to fail to see or hear government agents smashing aircraft debris into the back of cars or into walls or roofs, before the plane was supposed to have crashed. Or, again, fail to recognize that it is inconsistent with the government’s version of events.
On the whole, governments – in our world, in this reality – are not supremely competent. Presidents can’t always get away with relatively straightforward schemes, such as bugging their opponents. Or having sex with some woman who happens to be a co-religionist of the prime minister who arrived in Washington three days after news broke of the scandal, ostensibly for talks regarding the West Bank, but most likely trying to blackmail the president into taking part in a false-flag operation. Especially when the prime minister keeps in « close touch » with a friend and co-religionist who obtained a 99-year lease on a couple of towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 « per occurrence », and including property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two « occurrences » of terrorist attacks. And especially when one of the target floors (94 of WTC1) has already had the « upgraded » fireproofing installed, it’s due to be installed later that year on four more contiguous floors in the target zone, compatriots of the prime minister have already set up « moving companies » that operate in the states (NJ and NY) through which the fireproofing is to be transported, the prime minister has already « predicted » that « Islamist » terrorists would demolish the building, and « coincidentally » happens to be ex-Sayeret Matkal, an MIT alumnus, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem, the very same as one of the passengers on the plane that, three years later, was to fly into the building 102 minutes before it collapsed. A plane, incidentally, from which one of the so-called « hijackers » later turned up alive and well, and said his passport had been stolen in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. (And just for good measure, the woman also happens to be a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein, Gordon Duff, the late Julius Springer, and other principal players in these intrigues.)
Mossad agents are relatively competent, and yet Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel let themselves get so carried away with celebrating the first plane impact that they made a spectacle of themselves high-fiving, hugging each other, flicking a lighter, and appearing « visibly happy on nearly all » of the 76 photographs that they had taken and were subsequently developed by the FBI. They knew that their co-religionists’ control of the media and ability to pull strings in Washington would be their get-out-of-jail-free card.
The no-planes nonsense has been thoroughly debunked many times by people with professional experience in video production, and it is clear that any proponent of no-planes is either a lunatic or a liar.
A professor who qualified in history and philosophy of science would surely be aware that a « micro-nuke » or « mini-nuke » produces an EMP and radioactive fission products, and that it is not possible to incorporate devices into satellites that can fire « direct energy » beams with a power output in excess of the total power consumption of humankind. He would also be aware that when another professor makes a claim about beam weapons being used to demolish the WTC, yet doesn’t even bother to do energy calculations and is easily refuted by a competent scientist, and was reportedly in a coma for six years, then her ‘theories’ are clearly not to be taken seriously. When Fetzer says that he supports Judy Wood’s ‘research’ but doesn’t necessarily endorse her ‘theories’, Fetzer reveals his deception just as surely as if he’d given her his full backing.
The best explanation for Fetzer’s behavior is that he is a highly intelligent man who simply cannot believe that the government could be involved in massive conspiracies such as 9/11. So he remains a government loyalist, his confirmation bias, flawed epistemology and world-view leads him to imagine that all so-called « conspiracy theorists » are « goof-balls », and he believes he’s being patriotic in helping the government counter the conspiracy theorists by promoting nonsensical claims about faked planes and faked deaths, effectively parodying the real patriots and truth-tellers. Since Fetzer thinks that conspiracy theorists are all a bunch of nuts, he isn’t particularly concerned if his claims have not even a shred of credibility. He knows that he’s helping to trash the image of those perceived by the wider audience as conspiracy theorists or « twoofers« , and he thinks he’s doing the right thing.
3) A January 2008 paper by Cass Sunstein provides an example of a recent « conspiracy theory » and contends that believers in such theories create « risks »:
« …the belief […] that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out […] by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence… »
The « risks » are not to ordinary members of the public, as Sunstein would like people to believe, but to the true perpetrators of 9/11 and those involved in the cover-up, i.e., Sunstein and his pals, following an independent investigation, prosecutions, and fair trials.
According to Sunstein, the « best » way that « such theories might be undermined […] consists of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. » Sunstein claims that « those who subscribe to such theories » do so because they have a « crippled epistemology ».
Sunstein needs infiltrators who will mimic the silliest type of « conspiracy theorist » imaginable, by selectively accepting information only from the likes of John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Mike Powers / Hollingsworth and others who are part of the deception. A higher level infiltrator (e.g. Fetzer) will build his crippled epistemology using John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, etc., as its foundation, and will use the argument from authority fallacy against his critics, e.g., « Do you consider yourself as qualified as John Lear to address these issues? » Thus, these infiltrators will act the role of an individual whose epistemology is so « crippled » that they become parodies of genuine truth-tellers.
In Sunstein’s discussion of whether government should choose to ignore or rebut a « conspiracy theory », he points out that the disadvantage for the government in rebutting a particular theory is that it may « legitimate » the theory, and a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of « rebutting many conspiracy theories » because this yields a « synergistic gain » for the government from reducing « the legitimating effect of rebutting any one of them ».
Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government’s own 9/11 conspiracy theory of nineteen hijackers with box cutters. Thus, Sunstein recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and « cognitive infiltration » of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous theories such as no-one-died-on-9/11, no-planes-hit-the-WTC, WTC-was-nuked, and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook. Other agents can knock down these straw men, and will attempt to counter those who tell the facts about 9/11.
Theories such as no-planes and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook are promoted so strongly that they appear more popular than evidence-based theories about Israel’s central role in 9/11. Government benefits from the « synergistic gain » obtained from not legitimating a particular theory, specifically, Israel’s orchestrating of 9/11. Third-parties (the mass audience) form the impression that « conspiracy theorists » are all a bunch of fruitcakes who think the 9/11 planes were holograms, the WTC was nuked, no children died at Sandy Hook, and « crisis actors » pretended to be bereaved family members.
4) Jim Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein. These include:
- Epistemology and Cognition (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Sociobiology and Epistemology
- The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and Its Origins
- Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives
- Philosophy, Language, and Artificial Intelligence: Resources for Processing Natural Language (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Probability and Causality: Essays in Honor of Wesley C. Salmon
- Program Verification: Fundamental Issues in Computer Science (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
- Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science)
Sunstein needed someone to manage « cognitive infiltration designed to break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups ». Who better than a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already been flagged as operating a « campaign of disinformation » prior to 9/11/01, and « he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that ‘truth’. »
A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video and news reports, especially when the video producer’s father served as a controlled opposition Judas Goat to help counter allegations of collusion between government members and the Mafia, and whose brother’s Formula One racing career was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden. And he would know that a woman who was in a coma for six years and rambles on about space-based directed energy weapons is not a reliable source, when the energy required to vaporize (or « dustify ») the steel in the Towers is hundreds of terajoules, and the « weapon » would need to sustain a power output over ten seconds in excess of the total power output of humankind.
He would not be foolish enough to take at face value an ex-pilot’s claims about Flight 175’s speed and impact being « physically impossible« , especially when the claims have been proven wrong, and the ex-pilot used to fly missions for the CIA and other government agencies and discredits himself with claims about the Moon having a breathable atmosphere and « forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, [and] civilizations« .
He would understand that cherry-picking of information sources, e.g., blindly believing garbage propaganda videos that are intended to deceive such as September Clues, and believing the claims of an ‘ex’-CIA pilot and an ‘ex’-Bush Admin member, whilst rejecting more reliable sources, will lead to crazy conclusions typical of an individual with a crippled epistemology, and that such an approach can be used to parody the wackiest type of conspiracy theorist imaginable. Thus, Professor James H. Fetzer is ideally qualified for a leading position on Sunstein’s team of cognitive infiltrators.
5) Fetzer is not an honest debater. He has a system for controlling debates on his forum when it’s not going well for him – he bans his opponent and closes the comments!
As mentioned above, Fetzer’s « sophisticated hologram » scenario requires invisible, inaudible plane(s) to project the « hologram-plane ». One problem for the fakers is the matter of getting the correct Doppler shift for the engine roar, so that observers would hear, and amateur videos would record, the appropriate sound for the location. For example, listen to the engine roar on this video at around 04:15, seconds before Flight 175 smashes into WTC2 at approximately 590 mph. The camera is located well to the south of the Tower, and so the pitch audibly decreases as the plane passes overhead, slightly to the left of the camera. The decrease in pitch is typical of a plane passing roughly overhead. However, for an observer to the north of WTC2, the Doppler effect would be much less. Although the angle of the plane’s approach changes slightly since it’s hundreds of feet overhead, it never goes from approaching to receding from the observer. See around 07:50 on the same video for an example of that.
One option for the fakers would be to plant several very large, invisible loudspeakers, with inbuilt invisible amplifiers and an array of invisible batteries (or invisible cable going off to a mains power source) at various locations on the streets of Manhattan, which is of course impossible. Alternatively, the « projector-planes » would have to incorporate extremely powerful, directional loudspeakers with excellent bass extension mounted on their exterior, whilst capable of silent and invisible flight as these hypothetical planes speed away after the « hologram-plane » has supposedly crashed. All of this assumes that sophisticated hologram technology capable of fooling thousands of people is available, and was available in 2001 – which it isn’t, and wasn’t.
Amusingly, when Fetzer was called on this by a poster at Veterans Today named Rollo, Fetzer continued to dodge the question. After getting the last word in with ad hominems on how Rollo was obviously a « goof-ball or an op » who was « posting rubbish » (simply because he disagreed with Fetzer’s no-planes lunacy), Fetzer banned Rollo from responding and closed the comments on spurious grounds that Rollo did not « even know [Fetzer’s] position »!
6) Eyvind Hytten, the father of September Clues disinformation broker Simon Shack/Hytten, was a government asset who served as a controlled opposition, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon’s brother Mario Hytten was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden.
Simon Hytten and his sidekick Max Konrardy aka hoi.polloi make the most outrageous claims, such as no-one-died-on-9/11. Hytten and Konrardy’s lies are too crazy even for the likes of Jim Fetzer. On the one hand, Fetzer aims to appear just sufficiently wacky with his support of no-planes and mini-nukes that he can be instantly flagged as a crank by non-conspiracy-minded members of society, whilst fooling a few gullible, simple-minded people whose saving grace is that they trust the « truth movement » more than the government. On the other hand, Fetzer does not want to appear so cuckoo that not even the shills will support him.
Thus, outsiders can become aware of the garbage ‘theories’ of Simon Hytten and Max Konrardy, and will reject 9/11 truth as full of paranoid lunatics who imagine that everything about 9/11 was fake. And a few in the truth movement are taken in by Fetzer and friends, thereby destroying cohesion within the group as energy is devoted to claim and counter-claim of shilling, rather than exposing the perpetrators.
7) The Sandy Hookers attempt to substantiate their material by citing dubious sources such as Mike « Powers » aka Mike Hollingsworth aka Entryman aka Scorpion commander aka Jsteele7707, the suspected federal informant who tried to have Charles Dyer / July4Patriot jailed on charges of attempting to blow up federal buildings, before they managed to get him jailed for 30 years for « child abuse ». « Powers » is touted as a so-called « professional military investigator and ballistics expert » by Fetzer & Co in Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax, and is also cited by Alex Jones, who claims Israel could not have carried out 9/11.
8) It’s already been established that Zionist operatives post on the internet under multiple aliases, sometimes attacking 9/11 truth, and at other times posting crazy conspiracy theories to make « conspiracy theorists » look nuts. For example, one particular YouTuber (who at the time of writing operates the channel Oliver Terrance) posed as a dumb 16YO kid who swooned over Alex Jones (whom he described as « a very good looking man »!) and swallowed every crazy conspiracy theory under the sun: no-planes, WTC-was-nuked, directed-energy-weapons-toppled-WTC, etc. But part of the time he would attack 9/11 truth; for example, he said ae911truth are « faggots », and he would get praised by the likes of ctcole77. One of his channels was UnitedChildrenOfZion, and he also revealed his true allegiance with statements such as « Zionism will save us, shalom. »
This was all going on prior to Sandy Hook in 2012. Then, unsurprisingly, this Oliver Terrance character came out as a staunch supporter and promoter of Sandy Hook hoax / « crisis actor » theories.
9) John Lear, a promoter of no-planes, is an ‘ex’-CIA asset in the same manner that Osama bin Laden was an ‘ex’-CIA/Zionist asset. Lear, who has earned himself a reputation as « everyone’s favorite crackpot« , makes other kooky assertions, such as the Moon has « 64% » of Earth’s gravity, and an « atmosphere » in the craters that is dense enough to breathe in. People are well aware that « [John Lear] is a nut, which is why ATA Airlines fired him as a pilot several years ago« . (Lear’s story is that ATA fired him in 1989 for believing in flying saucers.) Thus, Lear further discredits himself in the eyes of « normal » people who are simply unaware of conspiracies and government crimes, and will induce that « truthers » are nuts.
But Fetzer cites this « nut » as an authority!!
The no-planer Dave Shayler, a transvestite who is obsessed with Kabbalah and declares himself to be the « Son of God », is an ‘ex’-MI5 asset. This is another example of an ‘ex’-Zionist asset who will lead ordinary people to imagine that « truthers » are lunatics and weirdoes.
The no-planer Morgan Reynolds is supposed to be an ‘ex’-Bush Admin asset. What a « coincidence » that Lear, Shayler and Reynolds all peddle the no-planes spiel and are all supposed to be ‘ex’-Zionist assets, who either retired or had some sort of falling out with their old paymasters!
10) In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of his writing was « at least purposely partially false« , and that about 30% of the material on Veterans Today is « patently false ». Duff, billed as « one of the top global intelligence specialists« , is the Chairman on the VT Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the « patently false » nonsense that may be found there.
Are they right, lunatics or liars?
Returning to Dr. Fetzer’s principles that we should « Consider the totality of the evidence », and « The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable », let’s ask which is the preferable hypothesis:
1) That the 9/11 planes were holograms and/or eyewitnesses were paid to lie, physical evidence was faked, video and images were faked, and so on, when it would have been far simpler to crash planes into buildings with Zakheim’s Flight Termination Systems. And hundreds of crisis actors were hired for Sandy Hook, children were paid or threatened to pretend to be dead and not talk about it throughout adulthood, in order that the government has a stronger case against gun control and the construction industry gets a few million dollars worth of work, when it is far simpler to wait until some lone nut with a gun goes on the rampage and not have to pay off the construction industry. And Mike Piper, Keith Johnson and Mark Glenn are part of the conspiracy, paid to help cover up the government’s subterfuge.
2) That four professors turn from brilliant academics into raving lunatics who are suffering from a « crippled epistemology » – including one who has co-authored and edited books and papers on epistemology, and another who specializes in media and communications. They not only subscribe to crackpot ‘theories’ about faked Boeings and faked deaths, but promote the ideas with an evangelical fervor. And others who can make videos, write, fly, spy, provide economics advice, etc., are also peddling garbage that is believable only by the certifiably insane or someone whose internet skills would amount to no more than replying, « Hello Mommy » in an e-mail.
3) That four professors along with dozens of others, all of them otherwise rational people whose confirmation bias precludes them from seriously considering evidence of government conspiracies such as Israel’s central role in 9/11, agree to act the role of epistemologically-challenged conspiracy theorists, in order to help the government counter « extremist groups ». The leader is selected because of his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems. He understands how limiting his sources of information to a narrow range of crackpots such as John Lear will enable him to act the role of one of Cass Sunstein’s hypothetical « conspiracy theorists » with a « crippled epistemology ». Another is recruited because of his knowledge of media and communications.
It doesn’t make sense that these esteemed professors should turn into lunatics and inexplicably develop a bizarre evangelical zeal to promote their crackpot theories, at the expense of making themselves look stupid, and even facing calls to resign in the case of James Tracy. It doesn’t make sense that the government would hire hundreds of crisis actors, or that thousands of conspirators would fake videos and images, write CGI scripts, plant aircraft debris, pay eyewitnesses to lie, etc., when they could simply wait for some lone nut with a gun or crash planes into buildings. It does make sense that otherwise intelligent people, with an ideological blind spot that prevents them from accepting that it wasn’t Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who masterminded 9/11, would agree to help the government, probably for a fee, by cognitive infiltration of « extremist groups ». The epistemologically-blinkered shills mistakenly perceive truth-tellers as « extremists » with a « crippled epistemology ».
And of course, many activists know that Israel did 9/11, but are motivated by tribal loyalty to play the part of no-planes, micro-nukes, Sandy-Hook-hoax and Boston-bombings-hoax theorists.
It is not hundreds or thousands of « crisis actors » who faked deaths and faked plane crashes. It is Fetzer, Reynolds, Wood, Tracy, Hytten, Konrardy, Friend and their colleagues who are acting and faking. Fetzer & Co are government loyalists who don’t subscribe to any conspiracy theories. Fetzer and his friends think that the Arabs did 9/11, Oswald was a lone assassin, and Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty was an accident. And they think they’re being patriotic by operating as Sunstein shills, disinformation agents, Judas Goats, and by lying, faking and acting as crazed conspiracy theorists. In reality, Fetzer & Co are traitors. However, in their blinkered world-view, Fetzer & Co imagine they’re doing the right thing.
(In the case of some of these people, such as Dave Shayler and John Lear, the jury is still out. If they’re not nuts, they’re putting on an excellent act. And if they are nuts, how convenient! But for those such as Fetzer, the evidence is that they’re too smart to believe the rubbish that they spout.)
When Dr. Fetzer meets up with his friends or old colleagues, he doesn’t need to play the role of a crackpot whose cognitive powers are in decline, leading him to fall for preposterous hypotheses whilst developing an irresistible urge to broadcast his weird beliefs to the world. He simply tells them that his « applied philosophical research » includes his role in infiltrating « conspiracy theorists ». After all, his friends and colleagues probably imagine that all « conspiracy theorists » are nuts who think the 9/11 planes and the Sandy Hook deaths were faked.
If we go back to Fetzer’s pre-9/11 admission that « he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that ‘truth’, » this is exactly how their scheme works. First they decide on a ‘truth’ such as no-planes or Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-all-faked. Then the low-level shills – e.g., CIA, MI5, or Bush Admin assets (in the case of no-planes), or hasbara trolls in the case of ‘nuts’ who seize on glitches in Google’s Sandy Hook date stamps – serve as the selective sources for the high-level shills such as Fetzer, who will build their epistemologically-crippled personae with their crackpot ‘theories’ on the foundations of these liars and propagandists.
When the media reports on James Tracy’s crazy theories about Sandy Hook and the Boston bombings and he’s facing calls for his resignation, he’ll tell the administrators that he’s acting a role for his conspiracy theories studies. Indeed, he needs to be as belligerent as possible, not even receiving a letter of reprimand until refusing for months to add a clear disclaimer at his blog to confirm that his views are not those of his university, and eventually relenting. (If they took no action against him, his legend would look even more suspect.) Given that Tracy is already on $64,650 per annum, there is no need for him to receive donations for his spare-time activities. Yet his website has a Donate button, most likely a flypaper trap that gathers the names and addresses of any patriots who are foolish enough to fall for it, for the attention of government agencies.
Sunstein’s best strategy is to have a team of shills with wildly varying credibility, who start out relatively good and then go downhill. If they’re all like Fetzer and post almost 100% bullshit, it’s easy for genuine patriots and truth-seekers to identify them. This tarnishes the reputation of « conspiracy theorists » in the eyes of the mass audience (the third party), but doesn’t achieve the shills’ other aims of weakening morale and sowing mistrust and despondency in truth-seeking circles. When the Zionists put a lot more investment into establishing an initial credibility, truth-seekers are less able to distinguish the fakes from the real patriots, and the counter-intelligence operatives attain all of their objectives.
Sunstein would love truth-tellers to think that Fetzer, Shayler, Reynolds, Lear & Co are part of their group – genuine, honest patriots who just happen to be crazy, rather than actors posing as crazy, honest patriots by lying and peddling bizarre claims.
In general, the various shills or disinformation agents will initially present themselves as relatively sane, genuine « truth-tellers », before deteriorating into lunatics. Sunstein’s strategy goes rather like this: Each shill is assigned a Starting Stupidity Number (SSN), with 10/10 being maximum on the stupidity scale. Over the months or years, the shill will progress along the stupidity scale, in effect, regressing or degenerating. At any given time, there are plenty of « sleepers », ready to degenerate when the time is right.
For example, Jim Fetzer started at 8/10, based on how he would « accidentally » plump for the craziest WTC demolition scenarios such as nukes or space beam weapons, when other, far more reasonable scenarios were being advanced. People with limited common sense and an aversion to science might have been fooled into thinking that maybe the government had developed a new, special type of small nuclear device, capable of reliable, timely, controlled detonation whilst leaving no radioactive signature. Fetzer progressed to 9/10 as he became a keen no-planer, posting drivel about a Boeing 767 being rather like a « flying empty beer can« . He would cite those such as ‘ex’-CIA asset John Lear as an « expert » who would back his claim that a Boeing 767 flying at approximately 590 mph whilst 1,000 feet above sea level was « physically impossible ». Lear, as a well-known crackpot who not only supports no-planes but believes the moon to be inhabitable with a breathable atmosphere in the craters, clearly had an SSN of 10/10.
Simon Hytten/Shack and Max Konrardy/hoi.polloi would have been assigned an SSN of 9/10, based on their peddling of no-planes propaganda. They later progressed to a stupidity factor of 10/10 with their « vicsims » imbecility, which claims that all 9/11 victims were faked.
Sofia Smallstorm began with a very low SSN on the basis of her 9/11 Mysteries video, which was reasonably good, but is now 9/10 or thereabouts after showing her true colors with a deceptive Sandy Hooker propaganda video and fully aligning with Fetzer and the rest of the disinformation gang. Eric Hufschmid’s SSN was also quite low; he started out with a book and video shortly after 9/11. His stupidity rating soon rocketed to 10/10 after he claimed people such as Ernst Zundel and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were secretly working for the Zionists. As Hufschmid became an increasing irrelevance, he posted naked rear-view pictures of himself on his website. We can only hope that Smallstorm doesn’t follow Hufschmid’s example!
John Friend was installed as the token « white supremacist », whose criticisms of organized Jewry would initially win him the confidence of some patriots and qualify him for a fairly low SSN. After aligning himself with Fetzer and becoming a no-planer and Sandy Hook denier, Friend advanced to 9/10 on the stupidity scale. The ADL was readily able to denounce him as an « anti-Semite » with « extreme views », and he serves as a brilliant example for whenever they want to portray Judaism’s critics as racist lunatics. As early as August 2012, Friend purportedly received a threatening e-mail from the JDL. Since Friend is not stupid enough to believe in no-planes, he must be working for Cass Sunstein, the JDL, ADL or a similar organization. Most likely the JDL, since they could then ‘threaten’ him in order to help establish his legend, or « cred building« , as a wise commentator said.
It is quite rare for a shill to be assigned an SSN of 10/10, but it does happen. According to Dimitri Khalezov, each Tower was demolished by a 150 kiloton thermonuclear bomb that had been placed 50 meters (164 feet) below the foundations when the Towers were built. Khalezov claimed the government (i.e., the Nixon Admin) was in on the plan, kept it a secret (i.e., successfully prevented Washington Post or New York Times reporters from uncovering the scheme), yet Soviet agents such as Khalezov became aware of it. And Khalezov stated that, although the planes that crashed into the Towers were really fake planes, New York officials believed them to be real. And because the plane that hit the Pentagon was really a cruise missile, and because officials had determined that it had an unexploded nuclear warhead, the New York officials feared that the « planes » that crashed into the Towers were also carrying unexploded nuclear warheads. And in order to save New York City from possible atmospheric nuclear explosions, the City officials decided to detonate the 150 kt thermonuclear devices that were buried beneath the Towers. Khalezov didn’t explain why WTC7 was pulled. See here for more on Khalezov’s particular brand of idiocy.
At any given time, a shill may « expose » other shills who are higher on the stupidity scale. So Fetzer exposes Hytten/Shack and his cronies, whose « vicsims » baloney made them a clear 10/10. Once a shill reaches 10/10, they can do just about anything. Hytten has called Fetzer a shill.
In the same way that government derives a synergistic gain from « rebutting many conspiracy theories », sincere truth-seekers can avoid legitimizing one or two of the most obvious disinformation brokers by rebutting many of them. However, it is now time for these shills to be sidelined, ignored, and recognized for what they are: government stooges, traitors and liars, for whom there can be no place in any truth or patriot movement.
Update (Feb. 21, 2014): For new information on Wolfgang Halbig (of Jewish origin) and his pre-Sandy Hook trolling and attempt to solicit money, click here.
Wolfgang Halbig, in his interview with Dave Gahary, suggests that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy because when the police arrived, « they » parked a quarter of a mile from the front door of the school.
In fact, according to the information in the Connecticut State’s Attorney’s Final Report, the first police officer arrived at Crestwood « Road » (actually Crestwood Drive) behind and to the south of the school at 9:39:00, three minutes and 21 seconds after the first 911 emergency call was received by the Police Department. It’s a little over 100 feet from the south end, and about 600 feet from the front entrance, which is still less than an eighth of a mile.
Halbig deceptively keeps waffling on with misleading comments such as « Why would you park a quarter of a mile…? » yet studiously avoids telling us that the next two police officers arrived a mere 13 seconds later – parking on the driveway near the ball field, barely more than a hundred yards from the front entrance. And the police deliberately decided to cover both approaches.
In any case, if a police car was approaching from the south, it’s normally a two-minute drive taking the long route from the junction of Washington Avenue / Crestwood Drive around to the front entrance, whereas on foot from Crestwood Drive, an officer would only need to do 6.82 mph in order to cover the 600 feet in a minute. Thus, even at high speed, there is little or no time advantage from taking the long route.
The Connecticut Police Chiefs Association (CPCA) Final Report states that the shift sergeant who was at the police station was among the first responders. Whilst en route, he sent some units to the front and some to the rear, as corroborated by radio recordings. « Local officers had knowledge that Crestwood Drive passes within yards of the rear of the school. »
The report provides an explanation as to why the police did not park very close to the front door: « In analyzing the response, it is important to know the accepted practice for officers responding to such a call. Officers arriving at the school must do so in a manner that allows them quick access to the facility, but must also be cognizant of their tactical positioning. Therefore, it is expected that first arriving officers would park a reasonable distance from the building in order to afford themselves the best view of the building and surrounding space. This allows officers to begin assessing the status and location of the threat. Officers are trained to prepare for more than one threat or aggressor. »
Halbig says [5:45], « And they’re parking on Crest View, Crest something Drive. » If we overlook his errors of more than +100% in his distance calculations, you’d think that Halbig would at least be able to get the name of the road right, after supposedly « researching » Sandy Hook for more than a year.
Halbig suggests that another reason it’s a conspiracy is that the paramedics took too long to go in. As shown above, police were searching the building and quickly triaging any victims they found. The EMS had not been cleared to approach the building at this time (since the possibility of additional shooters had not been ruled out), and an officer scooped up a critically injured child and sprinted towards the EMS staging area.
And the Connecticut Final Report says that at 9:39:34, a Newtown officer encountered an « unknown male running along the east side of SHES with something in his hand », and there were a number of factors that gave the police valid reasons to suspect that there may have been more than one shooter. The initial unknown male « turned out to be a parent with a cell telephone in his hand ». At 9:40:03, the last gunshot was heard, believed to be the final suicide shot of Lanza in classroom 10.
Anyone still curious about Sandy Hook, who hasn’t really looked into it much, should read those reports and see if there is anything that proves an « elaborate hoax », or if the response was reasonable given the circumstances.
It’s all very well for Halbig, with the benefit of hindsight, to speculate that the responders should have done some things differently. There is nothing to suggest that the police or paramedics made mistakes, based upon the information available to them at the time. But even if mistakes were made, that is not evidence of a conspiracy, and would do nothing to override the overwhelming evidence that Sandy Hook was a real massacre, not a hoax or a drill. And it’s rather telling that no other expert in school safety has come up with Halbig’s objections and gone public over the last fourteen months. The only people who have are liars and cranks who claim the 9/11 planes were holograms and the Boston bombings were faked with smoke bombs and amputee actors.
Halbig says he started contacting the Newtown public schools, probably « two months after the incident ». He claims « the pieces don’t fit », and asks why the FBI would « classify » the Sandy Hook report. The answer is that shortly after the incident it was already known that there was a flock of conspiracy loons all over the internet who, given half a chance, would post images of the dead children on their blogs and YouTube videos, harass the parents, and accuse them of being liars who were part of a massive conspiracy. So it’s not surprising that the authorities redacted some images, in order to spare the grieving relatives from the nutbars’ antics. Halbig claims the FBI has never « classified » such a report before, but prior to Sandy Hook, there has never been a troop of internet trolls trying to « prove » the relatives are liars and actors. It doesn’t prove Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Halbig complains his phone calls are not returned, implying that it’s evidence of a conspiracy. What does he expect – that hard-pressed officials would continue to humor some conspiracy crank and crackpot who bombards them for months on end with demands for evidence to prove Sandy Hook wasn’t a hoax? What if they kept receiving demands for evidence that would prove the earth isn’t flat? Isn’t there some point at which they would lose patience?
According to Halbig, Sandy Hook was a « script » that was in the planning for two to two-and-a-half years. Halbig claims that all sorts of things don’t fit, but presents not one shred of credible evidence – nothing more than the misguided opinions of a paranoid conspiracy theorist. Halbig claims he does not believe that any children died at SH, revealing himself as a liar or a fool. The only way that anyone could possibly be duped into thinking Halbig is raising some valid questions is if they hadn’t yet read the reports and were very generous in giving him the benefit of the doubt. More than two dozen did die at Sandy Hook Elementary, and the only killer was Adam Lanza.
In any case, all you really need to know is that Wolfgang Halbig chose to go to American Free Press (AFP) rather than a mainstream publication that would have given him more credibility with the general public. His Facebook page shows that he has a strong interest in the mainstream media: FOX 35 news anchors Sonni Abatta, Bob Frier, Amy Kaufeldt and others, The Washington Post, Newsweek, Time magazine, and Larry King. He also links to George W. Bush’s Facebook page.
AFP has been variously (and most unfairly) described as a « known hate site, filled with anti-semitic and racist ideology« , a « conspiracy-oriented anti-Semitic newspaper« , a paper that « promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories« , and a « right-wing extremist publication« . There are two possible explanations for Halbig’s choice.
Of course, the Sandy Hookers will claim Halbig couldn’t go to the mainstream media because they’re all in on the « conspiracy ». Let’s look at the proceeds from a hypothetical Sandy Hook « hoax ». $49 million was allocated for demolition and reconstruction. Since such projects generally go over budget, it’s unlikely that there would be money left over to bribe newspaper bosses and hire « crisis actors », etc. As of December 2013, there was some $12 million remaining to be distributed, and much of that is to be allocated to « long-term needs such as providing mental health resources, scholarships for affected students and funding for when Newtown comes to an agreement on a physical memorial to the victims« . Some money went to an animal sanctuary, a local Boy Scout troop, and to the gun-control lobby. The conspirators would also need to pay off hundreds of parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins, schoolmates, colleagues and friends to keep quiet for the rest of their lives, with the children having to play dead, not go to the Super Bowl, and so on. « Lanza’s » classmates would have to be bribed to pretend he existed, and those who didn’t say anything would need to be bribed, threatened, or killed to stop them from contradicting the others’ statements.
The conspirators either had to pay for Andrew Wheeler’s website’s domain in April 2003 and hire people to post on internet forums around 2009 as part of a plot to fake his existence, or they had to hire a « crisis actor » to pretend to be him, hope that the real Andrew Wheeler didn’t find out, and pay an assassin to stand by in Hawaii with instructions to shoot Wheeler if he was about to talk. Or, if they got lucky, recruit Wheeler, somehow persuading him to suspend his beloved island lifestyle for a new role as a « crisis actor ». Then the conspirators would have to pay off dozens or hundreds of other « crisis actors », the Police Department, forensic scientists, the coroner, and anyone at Homeland Security, BATF, the Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC) and other agencies who had any doubts about the scheme. Let’s suppose (being very generous to the Sandy Hookers) that after siphoning off money to bribe all these people, the fraudsters still have $1 million remaining.
And then they must pay off The Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The London Times, CNN, NBC, CBS, the BBC and countless thousands of other national and local newspapers and radio / TV stations worldwide, each of whom would love to have the scoop about any « hoax » at Sandy Hook. As of 2010, it is reckoned there were 14,853 newspaper titles worldwide.
Just to be even more generous to the Sandy Hookers, let’s forget TV and radio, and say that 4,853 or almost one in three of the newspapers are « conspiracy-oriented », which is a ridiculously generous assumption. If there are 10,000 mainstream newspapers to bribe to keep quiet, so that it’s worth their while to miss out on the Sandy Hook « hoax » story, that leaves $100 per newspaper before we count transaction costs, telephone costs, etc. And how much would a newspaper be willing to pay for such a scoop – $10,000? $100,000? $1 million? Whilst they accept less than $100 to give up their chance to make big money? Then there is the risk that some party involved in the negotiations with ten thousand newspapers would talk, or anyone tapping any one of the tens of thousands of telephone calls, or any of the « crisis actors », relatives, colleagues, classmates, police, forensic scientists, the coroner, the uncle in Hawaii, the assassin in Hawaii ready to shoot the uncle, etc.
And this supposes that all the proceeds are used to pay off the tens of thousands of conspirators. Thus, the « hoaxers » do not stand to make any profit from the scheme, and, moreover, must also borrow or put up their own money, years before even a cent came rolling in. The Sandy Hook « hoaxers » would have to be terribly incompetent buffoons with no understanding of business or investment, who are prepared to lose money (after interest charges and inflation) in return for the certainty of getting caught and going to jail for fraud, since there would always be some media outlets who would demand more than $100 for their silence.
The reality is that no mainstream newspaper would give any column-inches to a fringe conspiracy theorist with no evidence. Halbig wanted to restrict circulation to spare himself embarrassment. And by going to a « conspiracy-oriented » newspaper, the wider audience of non-conspiracy-minded folk will see that he’s just playing games with the « conspiracy nuts ». This is the very way they would play it if he was recruited to work for Sunstein to pose as a nutjob « conspiracy researcher ». So Wolfgang « Walter Mitty » Halbig does all he can to antagonize the cops for months on end, starting from February 2013, effectively accusing them of not doing their job properly. Then, after ten months, they eventually go round to his house « in plain clothes […] right before Christmas […] about 10:00 a.m. » for a « 15, 20 minutes » meeting to tell him that they won’t stand for it any more, and they’ll file harassment charges if he keeps wasting police time.
Thus, if we accept his tale of the police going to his home, that doesn’t prove there was a massive Sandy Hook global conspiracy, with Russia Today, The Guardian, Die Welt, etc., all in on it and having to be bribed from a conspiracy that makes a loss and just about guarantees the perps will go to jail.
The fact that the Sunstein team had to get Halbig to broadcast his opinions – and thereby advance him to 9/10 on the stupidity scale – in order to prop up their flagging conspiracy theory, after Michael Collins Piper’s False Flags exposed their deceptions, shows how desperate they have become.
A public schools security expert would be an ideal person for Sunstein to recruit for acting the role of a dumb « conspiraloon » who could concoct some imagined reasons for supposing the Sandy Hook events didn’t « fit », and whose childish crippled epistemology and inability to think through the ramifications of his conclusion, would lead him to imagine that more than two dozen deaths were faked at Sandy Hook.
In short, the Sunstein brigade’s Operation Halbig smacks of desperation, and shows that they are losing their battle to oppose truth-seekers by cognitive infiltration.
Update: It turns out that Wolfgang Halbig is not only Jewish, but was already an activist working to advance Jewish political interests as early as September 2012, months before Sandy Hook. He hates Obama, and was angry that someone did not kill Hitler, which he claims would have saved 6 million of « our » people.
In his Feb 19, 2014 broadcast at BlogTalkRadio, Halbig says [17:57] his father was in a « Nazi prison camp » for four years in Poland. This is corroborated by a post by Halbig of « a year ago », with the URL indicating September 2012, in which Halbig claims Obama « hates the Jews ».
• a year agoOBAM HATES THE JEWS AND DOES NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT JERUSALEM IS THE CAPITAL. HIS DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM REMOVED GOD FROM OUR FOUNDATION AS AMERICANS
Today I am as angry as anyone can get. What is it going to take for the uneducated Americans to get educated and start thinking about how they have responsibilities and not just rights that they throw in our faces everyday.
My father for four years I learned was in a NAZI PRISON in POSEN, POLAND.
Thank God that the Americans found him.
The letters I have now found in GERMANY makes me sick to my stomach as to what Hitler did to the Jewish Race. To this day I cannot believe that someone did not kill him which would have saved 6 million of our people there not just a jewish race they are people just like you and me. »
So that was from around September 2012. Then, three months later, the Sandy Hook mass killings occur, and Jewish political activists such as Halbig realise that they can exploit the event for a propaganda advantage.
Thus, Halbig is not simply some ordinary person who happened to work in school safety and thought there was something amiss about Sandy Hook. He is a Jewish political activist, working to advance Jewish public relations – the very sort of person needed for Sunstein’s team of shills who trash truth-tellers by promoting loony conspiracy theories.
On October 10, 2012, Wolfgang W. Halbig posted, and copied and pasted multiple times, that he’d been « gathering information about and evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, I have encountered hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing. None of those coincidences, by themselves, may mean much. But taken as a whole it is almost impossible to believe they were all the result of chance. » And then proceeds with a massive, lengthy series of events, such as how « In late 1999 Obama purportedly engaged in homosexual activities and cocaine-snorting in the back of a limousine with a man named Larry Sinclair… ».
One purpose of posting this would have been so that Cass Sunstein and his minions could observe how people would react to the insertion of various conspiracy theories, and who, if any, would pass it on. As they clearly did with the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories.
And in October 2012, Wolfgang Halbig was posing as a nutty conspiracy theorist, and provoking some interesting reactions. An excerpt included:
Wolfgang HalbigAround 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California . He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.
Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett was Michele Obama’s boss. She is now Obama’s chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?
Sunstein and his pals would have been interest to find out whether people did in fact consider Halbig’s ‘theory’ to be « nuts », or if folk would perceive some sort of « pattern » in his claims. The replies indicated a unanimous verdict: Halbig was considered to be nuts. « The paranoia and racism run deep in this one », « Sir you sound like a conspiracy theorist!! You have too much time on your hands. », « Wow….real KKK marerial. [sic] Reminds me of the John Birchers back in the 60’s. True Tea Party material. »
Halbig likes posting about the « uneducated » social class, and also posts about « the blacks » and « Mexicans ». For example:
[…] How can so many people be that stupid and not see the big picture. I picked fruit at age 12 all through High School to help my mother and I liked it because I got paid for my work.
The Mexicans are taking the blacks jobs because the blacks see those jobs as demeaning to their status in America. [..]
On March 23, 2012, Halbig was trolling, telling someone: « Your an idiot……….get a life.. How wrong can anyone be. You need mental health counseling if that is how you feel ».
A couple of people responded: « Wolfgang W Halbig A. He’s wrong only on his last(and maybe his first) point(s.) But how about pointing out how he is wrong instead of just throwing insults like a 9year old!? Aren’t you too old to be behaving this way? Losing your marbles??? » And: « Wolfgang W Halbig You’re the idiot…this « racist cracker » not white people, felt the need to « rid » the world of another (what he called) « coon » because he’s such coward that he goes after unarmed, young innocent black men ».
On July 24, 2012, Halbig was attempting to solicit money from gullible folk, by exploiting a post about a genuine donations campaign:
Please donate and investigate what we can do in saving children from committing suicide. I need $100,000 thousand dollars [sic] and probably pay it back once the company is up and running. wolfgang
More recently, he hopes to part Sandy Hookers from their money. On his interview by Dave Gahary, Halbig says [21:36] « Well, I think the next thing I’m gonna do is, right now I’m gonna try to raise a lot of money, some funds. I think there are a lot of people out there who really, really believe in learning the truth. You know, they call them conspiracy nuts; they call them all kind of names… […] But here’s my point: What I’m trying to do is raise a lot of money. »
Indeed, Halbig hopes to make « a lot of money » from « a lot » of people whom he also regards as « conspiracy nuts ». You can be sure that anyone gullible enough to fall for the scam will have their names and addresses passed on to Sunstein and agencies such as FEMA, Homeland Security, the ADL or the SPLC, thereby allowing Halbig to profit several times over from each person. Unfortunately, by the time truth-seekers « learn the truth » about Halbig and his scam, he’ll have scarpered with their money, and their personal details will have been harvested.
Halbig doesn’t doubt in the slightest that twenty children were killed at Sandy Hook. His supposed « research » and asking « questions » is nothing more than a masquerade, a means to a business and political end.
So, Halbig is an internet troll who inserts various conspiracy theories so that the Sunstein team can monitor the reaction. And his post « OBAM HATES THE JEWS » reveals what Halbig, hero of the Sandy Hookers, truly thinks about Sandy Hookers – they are simply « uneducated Americans », to whom he feeds his bait about faked deaths and faked shootings, in the hope that some of them will be « uneducated » enough to swallow it. In which case, they will have served their purpose, allowing themselves to swell his bank balance and be cited as examples of wacky conspiracy loons, with the result that those who present evidence of real conspiracies – such as the undeniable proof of Israel’s central role in 9/11 – are also tarred with the same brush. In the meantime, Sunstein and Zionist leaders are high-fiving and grinning as they celebrate the success of their counter-intelligence program against truth-seekers, who would otherwise present a much more serious threat against the perpetrators of false-flag terror.
Michael Collins Piper, False Flags–Template for Terror:
_This is guaranteed: You are about to be confronted with some harsh realities that may be unlike you’ve ever encountered in whatever you’ve heard about what happened at Sandy Hook school on Dec. 14 2012 and at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
_If you will be personally offended by expressions of fact and opinion (based on fact) that may contradict your deepest-felt beliefs regarding Sandy Hook and Boston, then please read no further.
_We’ll say it right now—and this will certainly astound you: Forget everything—everything—you’ve heard in both the mainstream media and in the “alternative” media about Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Then, after you’ve studied—if you dare—the material we are about to explore, you’ll realize what really happened at Sandy Hook and Boston is something unlike anything—and so very much bigger— than even you might have imagined.
_You’ll never look at Sandy Hook and Boston in the same way again. But you will be prepared for whatever future “crisis” the high-level conspirators undoubtedly have planned for America.
_As such, when that crisis happens, you’ll be better able to see through the fog of disinformation that will be once again unleashed— and rest assured that it will be.
In the wake of Sandy Hook and Boston, much was heard in the “alternative”media about “Crisis Actors” who played a part in misdirecting people’s attention as to the real facts about what happened during those “false flag” events.
_And false flag events they were. Both of those tragedies were classic false flag operations, but the truth is that they were not precisely the kind of false flag of the type that we saw carried out in the JFK assassination, in the Oklahoma City bombing, and later in 9-11.
_In fact, as we’ll see here—and this is the first time ever the story has been told in its entirety—the real “Crisis Actors” were not those whom many people believed them to be.
_And that is a story in and of itself.
_And it will surprise you.
_The story is much bigger than anyone might have conceived and it points toward the venal nature of a carefully-crafted high-level conspiracy that bears all the ear-marks of the manipulative masters of mind control whose not-so-fine (and ugly) hand was so clearly on the levels of power in the murder of JFK and those mass murders that followed in Oklahoma City and with the 9-11 terrorist tragedy.
_The vast flow of dissident information that erupted following the events of 9-11 made it an absolute“must” for the Mossad and its allies in intrigue to prevent it from ever happening again.
_You see, this is old-fashioned “crisis management” at its best (or worst).But the“crisis” in question—as you might naturally think—is not the death of the president or the lives lost in Oklahoma City or on 9-11.
_Rather, the crisis—in the minds of the conspirators responsible—is the potential danger to their power that could erupt if enough people came, for example, to conclude that the Mossad was indeed responsible for any of these false flag terrorist attacks on American soil.
_Therefore—in the wake of 9-11 and the Internet frenzy that took place with the rise of fast-moving and widely-distributed conspiracy theories (many implicating the Mossad)—it is now clear a conscious decision was made to ensure that, in the future, when any event of a conspiratorial nature occurred (particularly one involving the Mossad) that those most inclined toward acceptance of conspiracy theories would be corralled and misdirected through the most effective means possible.
_However, to achieve this end, it would be necessary to determine the best way to chart the rise and course of conspiracy theories; to pinpoint precisely who is most susceptible toward believing in them and, naturally, to do all that could be done to discredit them.
_But the plan—as we shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it was a stroke of genius).
_The intriguers effectively determined that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes). That is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to the mix.
_The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility.
_In the past, people did have doubts about the official stories relating to the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 tragedy. Now, however, emerging alternative theories about other events would be totally eviscerated—from within—and die by their own accord.Anyone putting forth any form of conspiracy theory would automatically become suspect, their very sanity questioned.
_The multiple stream of Internet provocations that captured the imagination of the “patriot” and“alternative” media following the Sandy Hook affair and the events in Boston were—beyond any question—the work of high-level conspirators whose designs were clear:
_1) To monitor the reaction of known (and potential) political dissidents to public events of a “crisis” nature;
_2) To gauge the level of conspiracy theorizing (and the acceptance of the theories) following such events;
_3) To trace the origins of conspiracy theories and to chart their course via Internet websites, email and other social media venues;
_4) To disrupt and misdirect conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theories whose views were deemed in some way problematic;
_and 5) To have in place a fully-functioning Crisis Management System—a very real “conspiracy”—that could be utilized to its fullest capacity at some future time.
_The first public hint of what was openly-acknowledged high-level intrigue of this sort—designed to undermine the 9-11 truth movement (not to mention any and all suggestions of conspiracies in other realms) was formally unveiled on January 15, 2008.
_At that time, one Cass Sunstein, a professor at the University of Chicago, and his co-author, Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule, put forth a so-called “preliminary draft” of what was officially issued as “Harvard Public LawWorking Paper No.08-03 and University of Chicago Public LawWorking Paper No. 199.”
_Although little-noticed at the time it was first issued, the “working paper” came under broad-ranging public inspection (widely discussed on the Internet) after Sunstein was drafted in 2009 by President Barack Obama to serve as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a post Sunstein departed in 2012.
_Later published under other auspices under the title “Conspiracy Theories,” the paper addressed the specific question of how the government should respond to conspiracy theories that were now holding wide sway (particularly on the Internet) and, in no uncertain terms, addressed what Sunstein (who is Jewish) considered the specific danger of the growing belief that Israel had played a part in 9-11.
_Naturally, 9-11 truthers were outraged by this paper and noted (rightly so) that the co-author was now effectively “minister of information” for the Obama regime: A U.S. government official was actually pondering, in writing,how government power could be used to deal with conspiracy theories and those who believed in them!
_Sunstein’s insidious and Orwellian “think piece” began by raising this question:
_Should governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers [of conspiracy theories] with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be addressed to the mass audience, with a view to innoculating them from pernicious theories?
_While noting that, in his view,“these two strategies are not mutually exclusive,” Sunstein went on to suggest that “perhaps the best approach is to straddle the two audiences with a single response or simply to provide multiple responses.”
_However, Sunstein said,many officials considered it “an exercise in futility” to try to respond directly to “the suppliers of conspiracy theories” and that, instead, they tried to “address their responses to the third-party mass audience, hoping to stem the spread of conspiracy theories by dampening the demand rather than by reducing the supply.”
_In answer to his own question“What can the government do about conspiracy theories?” Sunstein provided five possibilities:
_(1) Government might ban “conspiracy theories,” somehow defined.
_(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
_(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.
_(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.
_(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.
_Noting that each of these proposals had “a distinct set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each [of which] will have a place under imaginable conditions,” Sunstein answered the specific question of “What should government do?” by stating quite directly:
_Our main policy claim here is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of [the aforementioned proposals:] (3), (4), and (5).
_Clearly, Sunstein recognized that—at least under the First Amendment as it exists today—the government could not ban conspiracy theories outright or levy some sort of tax on those who purvey such theories that he and others find offensive.
_However, Sunstein concluded, the government could engage in efforts to counter the theories by recruiting“credible private parties” to combat conspiracy theoriests and by engaging in “information communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.”
_And this framework, in itself, is already in place. It is a very dirty and ugly history indeed, demonstrated by the long-standing collaboration between such groups as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center (not to mention the American Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee) working with the CIA and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as well as Israel’s Mossad—and, dare we add, British intelligence—in concerted efforts to undermine American political dissidents.
_Working from this standpoint Sunstein outlined what he called “a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories.” This program, he said, involved the following:
_[C]ognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.
_Because, Sunstein said,“conspiracy theorists are likely to approach evidence and arguments in a biased way, they are not likely to respond well, or even logically, to the claims of [people they know to be] public officials,” it was vital that, as Sunstein said,“government officials would participate anonymously or even with false identities” in 9-11 discussion groups and other conspiracy-focused gatherings on the Internet and elsewhere.
_And with the increasingly widespread knowledge we now have about the capacity of the National Security Agency—among many government intelligence agencies in the United States alone—to monitor the telephone calls, emails, and other Internet activity of all Americans,we can certainly say, with utmost authority, that Sunstein and his co-conspirators and like-minded intriguers had already concluded that the framework was in place to be able to see precisely who was engaged in conspiracy talk and with whom they were communicating.
_It is thus no coincidence that when the series of scandals erupted over the summer of 2013 regarding the activities of the National Security Agency (NSA) that Cass Sunstein was one of the four members of the so-called “independent” panel appointed by President Barack Obama charged with the responsibility of “reviewing” the operations of the NSA and other government agencies.
_And nor,we might add, it is any coincidence that another member of the panel, Richard Clarke (a former high ranking advisor to presidents—Democratic and Republican alike—in the realm of“national security”) now happens to head a private firm known as Good Harbor Security Risk Management.
_And yes, as you might have guessed, Good Harbor touts “Crisis Management” as one of its specialities.
_Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.
_The concept of “Crisis Management” is the new “big thing” in our modern era.And don’t forget—as we mentioned in Chapter Eighteen— that former high-ranking FBI official Neil Herman who was involved in much of the intrigues surrounding 9-11 (and who later worked as director of “fact-finding” for Israel’s American intelligence arm, the Anti- Defamation League) went on to become part of the “crisis management team” at Burson-Marstellar, one of the premier firms in that field today.
_In fact, two popular television dramas of recent date have Crisis Management specialists at the core of their storyline—“Scandal,” portraying the day-to-day workings of a beautiful African-American Crisis Management operative in Washington, D.C. and “The Good Wife,” featuring a particularly wily Crisis Management specialist (portrayed as a distinctly Jewish figure with the name of“Eli Gold”) who carries on his intrigues in Cass Sunstein’s home base of Chicago, no less.
_Both programs are quite revealing and say much about the nature of Crisis Management methods of operation.
_Several episodes of “The Good Wife” noted the use of “cyber shills” whose duty it is to infiltrate the Internet and place false stories and provocations designed to promote some particular agenda—or disrupt someone else’s.
_A simple Internet search of the term “Crisis Management”—and the term does deserve to be capitalized as we have rendered it here— demonstrates how foremost these new techniques of “public relations” (that is, propaganda) really are in the minds of those in high places.
_As we said: “Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.”
_So it was that—with the nature of Internet communication as it exists today and with the capacity to be able to monitor any and all content circulating on the Internet—Cass Sunstein and company had the means to construct and carry out a rather simple (but 21st Century-style technologically-sophisticated) exercise in Crisis Management planning which incorporated rather skillful experimentation with that new technology in implementing good old-fashioned Crowd Control.
And when we talk about Crowd Control,we’re not talking about the use of fire hoses and police dogs and stun guns. Rather, in fact, what we’re talking about is really just a highly-advanced form of “Mind Control”—one designed to influence a large number of people over an extended period of time through covert and quite insidious manipulation of the media—and that does include the Internet and the “alternative” and “independent” media as well. Unfortunately, a brief digression into the topic of Mind Control is relevant and important here, for it relates directly to the nature of the manipulative experiments in False Flag Crowd Control that were central to the Internet frenzy following both Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Long part of the intrigues of the high-level conspirators—best exemplified in the CIA’s infamous MK-ULTRA experiments in Mind Control, the initial stages of which were launched in the days following the CIA’s founding in 1947—this realm has not only been a province of the CIA, but also that of the Soviet KGB and Israel’s Mossad and other intelligence agencies (both public and private)—as well.
_Now, unfortunately, although the concept of Mind Control is best known among truth-seekers as a consequence of the widespread distribution of such works as Cathy O’Brien’s rather dubious book Trance-Formation of America, the truth is that there has always been available a wide variety of responsible material on the subject, in particular the book by former State Department foreign service officer John D. Marks entitled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
_Subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior,” Marks’ book was based on some 16,000 pages of documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act following the public revelations regarding CIA adventures in this bizarre field that were unveiled in the wake of a controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA. Until then, Americans believed that only “the Communists” and “the Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant experiments to manipulate human behavior.
_(The title of Marks’non-fiction book was inspired by the 1958 novel by Richard Condon—later a popular motion picture—entitled The Manchurian Candidate. In that horrifying story, an American soldier is brainwashed by the communists during the KoreanWar, falsely set up as a “war hero” to be revered by the American public, and later manipulated in an assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
_(It turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known “anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting communism.
_The mind-control victim never knows he is being manipulated— until it is too late.) So—all of that having been said—Mind Control is very real and can be carried out in a variety of ways.And Crowd Control—which is a part of Crisis Management—is a form of Mind Control. And you may rest assured that those who have in interest in these matters have studied these concepts carefully and know precisely how they work.
_And—as we have seen—with high-level forces having witnessed the growth of “conspiracy theories”which these would be masters of the universe realize endanger their power—particularly with the rise of the Internet as a somewhat “independent”means of communication— the need to combat those conspiracy theories (and to control the Internet) has become a major concern.
_These very real conspirators—people of the likes of the aforementioned Cass Sunstein,who actually laid out a plan for undermining conspiracy theories—determined the best way to facilitate their operation was to orchestrate (or take advantage of) an event that would grip the public imagination and then manipulate it for their own purposes.
_Their goal was to have in place a carefully-structured network that, in the future,could be used in a much-bigger fashion to direct or—as the case may be—to misdirect public opinion (particularly in the realm of those open to “conspiracy theories”) and ensure that the trade of information regarding such events was carefully controlled.
_Here, essentially,was the plan: These conspirators needed a “crisis”—a reasonably small and manageable event they could monitor and manipulate from the very beginning, finding out, essentially,“who’s in touch with whom” and by what means and venues conspiracy theories (relating to such a crisis) gained their most widespread circulation.
_Whether the crisis was “real”—that is, of its own making, one that happened on its own—or whether it was manufactured (through covert means by some clandestine agency) didn’t matter.
_What mattered was the capacity to track (and, more importantly, to direct) public reaction to the crisis (particularly in the realm of “conspiracy theories”) and to manage the crisis to such a degree that any and all conspiracy theories relating to that crisis could be made to look foolish.
_And here’s the critical point to remember: These conspirators also realized that they could effectively redirect public debate not just by countering conspiracy theories but by actively inserting their own downright silly and ridiculous disinformation into the debate with the aim of discrediting any and all conspiracy theories.
_Worthy of the greatest thinkers of theTalmud, it was right out of the legendary Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And it was programmed—from the start—to capture the imagination of (and control) the minds of sincere patriots who were already inclined (quite naturally) to buy into conspiracy theories!
_Fully versed in the legendary sociological study of crowd behavior laid down in 1895 by Gustave Lebon in The Crowd—a volume described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective behavior and of social psychology”—Sunstein and company set in motion a scheme that can only be described as brilliant, if not just simply as evil.
_To those who understand Sunstein’s proposition on the deeper level of Mind Control that it represents and who have likewise taken the time to carefully study the bigger picture in retrospect, it is all too apparent that the Internet-based frenzy following the Sandy Hook affair was clearly the work of the Sunstein crowd—we’ll call them the Crisis Management Conspirators—who remembered all too well what Gustave LeBon had said when he wrote so succinctly:“To know the art of impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them.”
_The Sandy Hook affair was tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control, inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no less.
_The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
_And, quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
_And naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook.
_Now some of the errors were eventually corrected,but many of the errors were simply ignored or otherwise lost in the shuffle, and this led to further suspicions on the part of those who sensed that there was more to Sandy Hook than was officially being reported.
_(Unfortunately, although some of the errors were indeed later corrected,many so-called “conspiracy theorists” never became aware of those corrections and continued—even to this day—to cite those
“errors” as evidence of a cover-up.
_(And that’s another reason conspiracy theorists must be detail-oriented, for if they can be disproven in one minor area, those who are eager to dismiss their theories will use that one mistake as “evidence” that the bigger picture—the more broad-ranging so-called “conspiracy theory”—is, in and of itself, totally wrong.)
_But note this:
_Considering the fact Sunstein and his like-minded conspirators do have high-level connections to the controllers of the big media, it’s likely some media elements deliberately purveyed incomplete or imprecise stories about Sandy Hook, knowing full well that alert readers and audiences would detect these errors and that they would be bandied about as “proof” of a conspiracy, further muddying the waters.And that, in fact, is what happened in many instances.
_However, as we shall see, there is strong evidence to suggest that at least some “inside” elements in the mass media did play a key role in “leaking” material that was used by the Sunstein group to distract truth seekers in the wake of Sandy Hook. More about that later.
_But aside from the mis-reporting in the major media (whether deliberate or otherwise) it was almost exclusively on the Internet—via the so-called “truther” and “alternative” and “independent” websites, discussion groups, along with email and the popular video forum, YouTube, etc—that a wide variety of absolutely baseless (and largely nonsensical) stories about Sandy Hook began to appear.
_This was clearly the work of a small but skilled team of operatives working for Sunstein and company.
_As Sunstein had suggested in his now-infamous working paper, their purpose was to manipulate—and ultimately refute—and make fools of—sincere truth seekers and so-called “conspiracy theorists.”
_And, even more so, Sunstein’s goal was to convince the broad range of the American public that anyone who spoke about any conspiracies at high levels was just simply not someone to be believed.
_One of the first and most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oftrepeated theme that“Sandy Hook was a hoax”and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that was a frequently repeated allegation.)
_Even the introduction of the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited.
_And—just as Sunstein and company expected (and desired)—other individuals discussing other matters involving conspiracies (the 9-11 cover-up, the Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, and even the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty) were themselves being subjected to sarcastic comments such as,“I suppose you’re also one of those people who doesn’t believe those 20 little children were killed at Sandy Hook.”
_Sunstein and company had scored big.
_They knew they literally had a proverbial “captive audience” that was unwittingly receptive to their manipulations. And they had the capacity to track—via the Internet—the entirety of the exchange of information going on.
_This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams.
_Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators implementing his plan recognized that the diverse assortment of groups active in political dissent —whether they call themselves “patriots” or “nationalists” or “truth seekers” or “white separatists” (the list of such largely selfimposed labels could go on and on)—constituted the definition of a “crowd” as laid forth in the aforementioned Gustave LeBon’s rather sinister analysis of the manner in which a “crowd” can be manipulated.
_In its ordinary sense the word « crowd » means a gathering of individuals of whatever nationality, profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances that have brought them together.
_From the psychological point of view, the expression « crowd » assumes quite a different signification. . . .
_The sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and the same direction, and their conscious personality vanishes. A collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but presenting very clearly defined characteristics.
_The gathering has thus become . . . an organized crowd, or, if the term is considered preferable, a psychological crowd. It forms a single being, and is subjected to the law of the mental unity of crowds.
_In other words, these proverbial “mad scientists”—these modernday Crisis Management Conspirators, steeped in the teachings of LeBon—saw that conspiracy theories tended to form (and initially circulate) within a“crowd”of like-minded individuals and that, from that standpoint alone, such a crowd was easily manipulated. It was, after all, the High Priest of Crowd Control, Le Bon himself,who pointed out that:
_However indifferent it may be supposed, a crowd, as a rule, is in a state of expectant attention, which renders suggestion easy. The first suggestion formulated which arises implants itself immediately by a process of contagion in the brains of all assembled, and the identical bent of the sentiments of the crowd is immediately an accomplished fact.
_That is, once a particular “theory”—some particular thought, some particular “factoid” (as they now call it)—has been inserted into a likeminded crowd, that factoid (even if, per chance, it doesn’t happen to be true) almost becomes an article of faith or even, as Le Bon said, “immediately an accomplished fact.”
_As such, the Le Bonian Mind Control masterminds recognized that precisely because a “crowd” tends, thus, to think alike, and accept all precepts that “sound good” or which seem parallel to their particular mindset, that a “crowd” would immediately incorporate by “process of contagion” any idea inserted into the mass thinking of the crowd.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators knew that once a “crowd” had become conditioned to “think alike” (so to speak) and was thereby easily subject to the power of suggestion, that such a like-minded group would immediately start to develop its own particular mindset a way of looking at some issue or event.
_As Le Bon pointed out:
_The simplest event that comes under the observation of a crowd is soon totally transformed.
_A crowd thinks in images, and the image itself immediately calls up a series of other images, having no logical connection with the first. We can easily conceive this state by thinking of the fantastic succession of ideas to which we are sometimes led by calling up in our minds any fact.
_Our reason shows us the incoherence there is in these images, but a crowd is almost blind to this truth, and confuses with the real event what the deforming action of its imagination has superimposed thereon.
_A crowd scarcely distinguishes between the subjective and the objective. It accepts as real the images evoked in its mind,though they most often have only a very distant relation with the observed fact.
_Essentially, because so many people in “The Crowd”—that is, the “truth movement”—saw (quite clearly) that the mass media was attempting to stoke up demands for increased gun control measures (even outright gun confiscation on a national scale), the whole image of Sandy Hook changed in its entirety.
_In fact, this was the REAL “false flag” in the whole Sandy Hook debate, but many good patriots didn’t see what was happening.
_Rather than focusing on the genuine issue of specific concern—the push for gun control—“The Crowd” was instead gettting bogged down and looking in the wrong direction, worrying about a variety of unimportant details and making allegations about Sandy Hook—that no children had actually died, for example—that made honest critics of gun control look foolish, if not downright venal.
_Most people among the general public more or less accepted the idea that a disturbed young man had committed a horrible deed and that—predictably—gun control advocates once again jumped on the tragedy in order to pursue their anti-gun agenda.
_A lot of people—including a lot of people in the “truth movement”—had previously (and rightly) expressed concerns that many of the people involved in previous mass shootings had been under the influence of psychiatric drugs which have been pushed by the major media to the great profit of the pharmeceutical conglomerates.
_And at the outset, even most skeptics of the official version of events had no doubt buying the possibility that the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza,had been the victim of MK-ULTRA style mind control,brainwashed into committing a mass shooting in order to help stampede public support for gun control or outright gun confiscation.
_Over the years more than a few independent journalists had compiled an assembly of data on a number of mass shootings in the U.S. and elsewhere suggesting there was much more to the story behind these shootings; that, in fact, they were orchestrated by behind-the-scenes forces and that there was evidence of “mind control” involved.
_So there were a lot of good reasons for many to at least suspect that perhaps there was some sort of Mind Control or other form of high-level intrigue involved in the Sandy Hook shooting.
_In fact—up until Sandy Hook—this explanation (that Lanza was a mind-controlled false flag patsy who actually killed little chiildren) would have sufficed for even the most hard-core skeptic who doubted the official version of events laid down by the authorities.
_But with Sandy Hook—and the intervention of the Crisis Management Conspirators—the outlook of the“average”grass-roots conspiracy theorist in “The Crowd” would never be the same again.
_As a consequence of the intrigues of the Crisis Management Conspirators, the mindset of the conspiracy theorists would be drastically altered to the point that many good people were pushed into the direction of believing that absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing— could ever be believed and that everything—absolutely everything— was a horrendous lie.
_And we are not talking just about Sandy Hook.We are talking about virtually anything—everything—taking place in our world today.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators were pushing honest truth seekers in“The Crowd” into a proverbial padded cell where they could just keep screaming at the top of their voices and banging their heads against the wall with the ultimate realization that nobody was paying any attention to them whatsoever—a virtual Twilight Zone.
_Nonetheless—on a parallel basis—the Crisis Management Conspirators,quite naturally,didn’t want anyone in the general public, at least, to ever consider the possibility that there had been any Mind Manipulation or any conspiracy to stage a“crisis”—such as another mass shooting—to justify gun confiscation.
_Therefore, they began spinning bizarre tales and inserting them onto the Internet and into the mind of “The Crowd”—that is, patriots and other skeptics of the official story—in order to muddy up serious inquiry and discussion.
_They dazzled “The Crowd”with an array of colorful and interesting and fiendishly clever (if not obviously outrageous) rumors that absolutely had the immediate and profound (and very much intended) effect of directing public ire upon those good patriots—the so-called “conspiracy theorists”—who were rightly concerned about behind-thescenes manipulation that accompanied the events at Sandy Hook.
_Soon enough—and not surprisingly—people in the general public began to think any conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook were absolutely beyond the pale and that people inclined toward conspiracy theories questioning the official government line were crazy troublemakers who belonged in mental hospitals!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute the latest Sandy Hook “revelations.”
_And, of course, this—as we shall see in a moment—was all keeping in line with another aspect of the “crowd” that the “guru” of the Crisis Management Conspirators—Gustave LeBon—had already assessed.
People were falling victim to the the fact that because something is repeated time and again, it gains a certain credibility in the mind of the ‘crowd.” LeBon wrote:
_The influence of repetition on crowds is comprehensible when the power is seen which it exercises on the most enlightened minds.
_This power is due to the fact that the repeated statement is embedded in the long run in those profound regions of our unconscious selves in which the motives of our actions are forged.
_At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.
_When an affirmation has been sufficiently repeated and there is unanimity in this repetition . . .what is called a current of opinion is formed and the powerful mechanism of contagion intervenes.
_Precisely because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be raising these questions. However—and this is a point that many failed to consider at the time (but which many patriots are now coming to realize):
_The truth is that a vast majority of the Sandy Hook spin came from theretofore unknown sources—who to this day still remain largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames—who helped put out much of the material in the first place, adding often-dubious commentary that helped stir up suspicion in the first place.
_As LeBon had so rightly said, “at the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.” How true it was with Sandy Hook!
_These Internet sources who had suddenly popped up had no reputation (either good or bad) among traditional patriots and conspiracy theorists—but their impact was immeasurable.
_And they were ably aided and abetted by some longtime deep-cover assets—agents provocateurs—inside the patriot movement who helped give further “credibility” to these stories being cranked out by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_A lot of old CIA hands and federal informants—veterans of the black propaganda journal Media Bypass (referenced in Chapter Fourteen) that had been heavily funded and set up in time for the disinformation surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing—-popped up to help disseminate a lot of the Sandy Hook-related nonsense that gripped the imagination of the patriots.
_Meanwhile, on a daily basis, the powers-that-be in control of the mass media were cranking up a continuing round-the-clock campaign in favor of gun control,pointing at Sandy Hook as underscoring the necessity for dismantling the Second Amendment. It was, they said, “for the children.” Americans were told they needed to give up their guns so as to prevent future tragedies of this kind.
_But the irony is that many good people who thought that by“exposing the Sandy Hook fraud”—that is, passing on the Internet-based rumors about Sandy Hook—that they were “doing something” to stop the drive for gun control. In fact, it was a total misdirection from the central issue of gun control. Peoples’energies were being focused not on gun control but on the “necessity” to “spread the truth about Sandy Hook.”
_And that, as we’ve said,was the real“false flag” in Sandy Hook. However,unfortunately, the patriots who were repeating the Internet rumors were giving a whole new twist to the controversy surrounding Sandy Hook and the push for gun control that came in its wake.
_What was happening was that the more the conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook got all the more fantastic, the more it had the effect of discrediting all sincere critics of gun control who were being identified with “those people who say that no children really died at Sandy Hook.” The bottom line matter of fighting the drive for gun control was sidelined by “The Crowd” which had become caught up in discussing (and perpetuating) all of the silly Sandy Hook rumors that the Crisis Management Conspirators had unleashed on the Internet.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators—having a field day (and a good laugh) at their success in re-shaping the thinking of conspiracyconscious patriots—knew full well of another key concept put forth by LeBon: The fact that a “crowd” can accept the most ridiculous propositions, ones that an individual—prior to becoming a member of the “crowd”—would not be so ready to incorporate into his thinking. if given the time to consider the matter more fully.
_More and more a fabulously colorful bazaar of bizarre conspiracy theories began to swirl around Sandy Hook. Many of these theories— often promulgated as part of a grab-bag package by their promoters— were directly contradictory.
_Here’s an example.
_One big name figured out that Israel’s Mossad was behind the shooting. His proof? Well, everybody knows that the Mossad is murderous and that Israel has no problem killing children.
_This authority claims a three-man Mossad team pulled off the job— but then again, there are folks who say this investigator is dead wrong (pun intended) since, of course, nobody was killed at Sandy Hook at all, or least not enough people killed to justify a big-time Mossad operation of the kind described by that analyst.
_However, as far as the Mossad is concerned (vis-a-vis Sandy Hook) there were two different claims in this regard. Some said the Mossad did it to hurt President Obama, getting revenge against the president for not being pro-Israel enough. Others said the Mossad did it to help the president further along the conspiracy to grab America’s guns.
_In other words, if you think the Mossad did it, you have two entirely different (and quite contradictory) motives to choose from. And so, depending on what you think of Barack Obama, you have two different versions of the story that “The Mossad Was Behind Sandy Hook.”
_But the foundation of this theory—which is certainly delectable to anyone who has professed belief of Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and in 9-11—doesn’t have any basis in any given facts, the exciting scenario itself notwithstanding.
_Yet—believe it or not—after I publicly discounted Mossad involvement in Sandy Hook (on the basis that I had seen no actual proof—even circumstantial—of such involvement) I was accused of “covering up for the Mossad” and of being “a Zionist agent.” (Seriously.)
_In fact, there is no proof that Mossad assassins were involved in any shooting (real or staged) in Sandy Hook.
_How the Mossad was involved in Sandy Hook was in a way most of the great conspiracy theorists clearly were unable to figure out, so busy they were with distributing the increasingly more silly and unlikely conspiracy theories that were running wild on the Internet.
_The Mossad was hiding in plain sight and the patriot researchers and conspiracy theorists never saw it at all.
_It was clearly allies (or outright assets) of the Mossad—figures in Cass Sunstein’s Crisis Management gang—who were conjuring up and distributing the ridiculous stories that gained such currency. In effect, the patriots were passing on Mossad-sponsored black propaganda and they never understood that at all!
_And, naturally, this had the desired effect of making any and all conspiracy theorists—especially anyone who might date mention the dread word “Mossad”— look crazy,marginal and generally to be disbelieved.
_So, in that sense, the Mossad was behind Sandy Hook but not in the way that many Sandy Hook true believers might like to think.At the very least, the Mossad profited from Sandy Hook by being able to monitor (and manipulate) the conspiracy theories that emerged. It was a classic experiment in Crisis Management and Mind Control and the patriot dissidents never understood that at all.
_And that’s precisely why the bad folks at the Mossad and their allies among the Crisis Management Conspirators had a good laugh at the antics of the “patriots” who were hawking the latest disinformation inserted onto the Internet designed to make those patriots look foolish.
_But despite the contradictions in this realm (and in other aspects of the stories circulating about Sandy Hook) that didn’t seem to phase many who helped spread the stories saying,“I’m just passing on what I’ve heard.” These people actually believed that as a member of “The Crowd” they were doing their patriotic duty, having no idea they were being manipulated by the very forces they were seeking to combat!
_The Crisis Management Conspirators had once again put the theoretical precepts of their High Priest—LeBon—into practice by conjuring up (and putting into distribution via the Internet) the most audaciously ridiculous narratives.They knew full well that “The Crowd” would buy into these stories without question.As LeBon wrote:
_The figurative imagination of crowds is very powerful, very active and very susceptible of being keenly impressed. The images evoked in their mind by a personage, an event, an accident, are almost as lifelike as the reality.
_Crowds are to some extent in the position of the sleeper whose reason, suspended for the time being, allows the arousing in his mind of images of extreme intensity which would quickly be dissipated could they be submitted to the action of reflection.
_Crowds, being incapable both of reflection and of reasoning, are devoid of the notion of improbability; and it is to be noted that in a general way it is the most improbable things that are the most striking.
_This is why it happens that it is always the marvellous and legendary side of events that more specially strike crowds.
_Clearly, this phenomenon explains why so many otherwise sensible people began to believe some of the most extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook set loose on the Internet by theretofore unknown“sources” with no record of recognition or credibility in any way, shape or form.
_Because so much of this material was being so quickly and so widely distributed and then being re-distributed by others eager for new information about Sandy Hook, these improbable and ridiculous notions effectively became a matter of fact. And, as LeBon said, the “marvellous”—that is, the most striking, even outrageous—aspects of the Sandy Hook theories were what took hold.
_Before long, it was being said that accused Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza hadn’t even fired a single shot that day.According to the story, he had never even been in the school that day—not alive, at least. The story was that Lanza had been formally declared dead by the Social Security administration one day before the shooting—and that he died in New Hampshire (a state away). The real conspirators behind Sandy Hook had not only killed Lanza the day before,but—evidently following the law (!)—they had made certain to register his death with the Social Security administration, law-abiding folks that these conspirators were.
_When some “theorists”were pressed on this point, they could only respond,“Oh, well, they wanted us to discover that.This was their way of confounding us and showing us they could do anything they wanted. They wanted us to see that there really was much more to the story but they also wanted to display their power to cover up the truth.”
_Hardly a day had gone by before it was alleged that the police and fire departments were involved in the conspiracy, deliberately blocking the exits to the school during the shooting for the purpose of ensuring that the killers could rack up as high a body count as possible.
_The county coroner’s public persona rubbed people the wrong way. Somebody pronounced the judgment that he wasn’t “acting right” for someone who had just performed autopsies on a bunch of purportedly dead children and therefore he definitely had to be in on the act. He was just “too weird.”
_Soon enough, that was the final word on the matter among dissidents. Somebody had said it, so therefore it had to be true.
_But the real question is this: WHO first said it and why did THEIR judgment effectively become the last word on the subject—“proof”of a much-bigger conspiracy?
_Nobody seemed to know precisely where so much of the “dissident” opinions were coming from—but whatever was said was freely passed on as though it constituted solid proof of “something.”
_Because the police initially prevented families from viewing the bullet- ripped corpses of the children, word spread that the families never once saw their dead children at all, despite the fact there were open casket funerals for a number of the children the conspiracy theorists said had never really died.
_Wax figures in the coffins,maybe? Designed to fool the parents who believed that their children had been killed? (Or were the parents, as some said, in on the conspiracy?)
_“If they reported that the families couldn’t see the bodies,” demand ed those who said they were “just asking questions,” then why, they asked,didn’t the media then report that the families were finally allowed to see the bodies?
_In fact, as anyone who has watched any of the standard police procedural dramas that occupy much of television today knows full well, it is not police procedure to allow the bodies of crime victims to be immediately inspected by the families. And no, that’s not “just Hollywood.” That’s how it really works.
_Ask your local policeman.
_In fact, families were later allowed to view the remains of their dead loved ones and in several instances (brought to my attention) there were open caskets for children who had died.
_Here’s the story:
_In a radio broadcast on Jan. 20, 2013 I had urgently warned truth seekers not to be taken in by all of this emerging nonsense and came under a great deal of criticism from many good folks who were fervent believers in the theory that no children had died and that the stories told by surviving Sandy Hook teachers (and children) were all lies.
_However, I was heartened when—during an email exchange between myself and two well-known and respected patriots, Carol Asher, the longtime assistant to famed peace officer Jack McLamb, and Ron Neil of the Dollar DVD Project Liberty (see the website at onedollardvdproject. com)—Ron sent me this email saying: “You surprised me with your attitude about Sandy Hook. I respect your opinion and will be more careful on this subject.You reminded me that we must focus and not get sidetracked.”
_(My whole point from the start! But most people who had joined the Sandy Hook frenzy couldn’t quite see that, as Ron Neil clearly did.
_And—to the heart of the matter—Ron also sent Carol and I a communication from one of his correspondents who was commenting critically on allegations that Sandy Hook teacher Kaitlin Roig was a fraud.
_While Roig was being hailed as a heroine for having rescued her students, there were truth seekers who had become convinced by the disinformation from the Crisis Management Conspirators that Roig was an audacious liar.Neil’s correspondent took issue with the claim—circulating on the Internet—that Roig wasn’t even a teacher.
_In fact, she wrote: “She [Roig] is my grandson’s teacher and I know that part is factual,” adding a very real warning for truth seekers:
_I think that a huge mistake has been made for the alternative media. We are looking like « nuts » . . . especially the people that say that nobody died. My daughter went to several wakes and funerals. And . . . she saw open caskets. Some of her dear friends lost their children!
_In the meantime, though, this teacher,Kaitlin Roig, was being called “a possible Israeli Mossad terrorist” and a “false witness” and was subjected to the claim that she was really actress Rebekah Fernandez who was supposedly posing as a fake Sandy Hook teacher—namely Roig!
_So although there was very real proof that Roig was a Sandy Hook teacher, there were people who were saying that she was actually a “Crisis Actor”—much more about the Crisis Actor theories later—who was playing a part to help perpetrate a gigantic fraud.
_However, one truth seeker—recognizing that there was something wrong with all of this—commented in response to an Internet posting of a video of an interview with Roig that critics “proved” she was a liar, an audacious actress posing as a heroine:
_What doesn’t make sense to me, too, is that this Kaitlyn Roig is supposed to be a paid actor, yet she is, or was, a teacher at the time of the shooting?
_I mean, so let me get this straight: She taught at this school for, how long?
_But, suddenly, now that this incident happened, and she’s giving this report about what went down in her own classroom, suddenly she’s just labeled a « paid actor, » because people think she’s lying?
_And—get this—some of Roig’s critics even thought the fact that Roig was married immediately after Sandy Hook was additional proof that she just couldn’t be for real.“If she was so affected by the tragedy,” people growled,“how could she dare get married?” This was the kind of genuinely crazy theorizing (and thinking) that the Crisis Management Conspirators had so effectively conjured up.
_(A personal note: My oldest brother and his wife were married on the very day just hours her cousin and two of their childhood friends— who were supposed to attend that wedding—were killed in a tragic explosion. Nobody—absolutely nobody—perceived their decision to proceed with the marriage as being crass or as inappropriate.)
_But in the wake of Sandy Hook, it became an article of faith that anyone who seemed to affirm the“official” story in any way was lying. And it was such an attitude that gripped the minds of truth seekers to the point, as Ron Neil’s aforementioned correspondent said, that “We are looking like ‘nuts.’”
_But truth seekers had become so much a part of “The Crowd” that they couldn’t see what was happening and how they were effectively discrediting themselves in the minds of the public.
_And then the fact that the police would not release particular details of the shooting was said to be “proof” that there was a cover-up. But, again, the truth is that even a cursory reading of any daily newspaper reporting on the most mundane of events involving a police investigation will reveal—time and time again—that the police just simply do not go about releasing a lot of data while any investigation is going on. That’s a fact that can be confirmed by even the most casual reference to any given newspaper in any town or city in the country.
_However, under the clever contrivance of the Crisis Management Conspirators,honest truth seekers had become totally distracted,caught up in minutiae that was absolutely irrelevant but which, nonetheless, seemed to possess the patriot movement, as if by magic.
_The proverbial “Crowd” had been caught up in a whirlwind of deliberate disinformation. It was as though some people genuinely wanted to believe that nothing—absolutely nothing—was true.That all was a lie. And a lot of cheap hucksters—along with the Crisis Management Conspirators—played on this.
_It was even said that the governor of Connecticut had advance knowledge of the impending “event”—we’ll call it an event, rather than a shooting, since a lot of people don’t think anybody was really shot at Sandy Hook in the first place!
_The basis of this rumor was the fact the governor had said publicly that he had been told that such an event could happen.
_What the governor was saying—and this was no secret—was that public schools and other venues—public and private, including shopping malls, bus stations, etc—had been training their own personnel in the matter of dealing with such an emergency.
_However, the governor’s comment—based on something that had been widely reported for months, even years, on end in the mass media (that is, how communities were preparing to deal with such events)— was twisted and presented as a Freudian slip that revealed the governor’s foreknowledge of the impending crisis at Sandy Hook.
_According to one claim, it was Attorney General Eric Holder (evidently another of the many conspirators) who briefed the governor a full month in advance that there was going to be a phony happening at Sandy Hook to be presented to the public as a “school shooting.”
_How many other public officials and law enforcement were brought into the loop no one could really say for sure, but then, again, it had already been suggested (as noted earlier) that the local police and fire departments were part of the massacre (or, at least, the cover-up). It seemed like the entire town was involved. But, then again, there were those who were saying that no massacre had even really happened!
_It came down to this: There were some 500 students at Sandy Hook. However, as we’ve said, some people don’t believe there really was a functioning school there at all. And it is said that—of those 500 students—20 of them (along with their families and others) faked their deaths.But some truth seekers—influenced by the disinformation of the Crisis Management Conspirators—now question whether at least some—if not all—of these students ever even existed!
_But accepting the idea that 20 students are no longer officially alive (and thus presumably in hiding) that means there are some 480 other students (and roughly 960 parents) and lord knows how many thousands upon thousands of siblings, grandparents, aunts and uncles related to the “surviving” 480 kids who are participating in one of the most extraordinary hoaxes of modern history.
_Meanwhile, others said, Newtown, Connecticut and its environs was an outpost of Satanism and that most of the people in town were Satanists.
_That explained why virtually everyone was involved in the conspiracy designed to portray a non-event as a bloody massacre.
_When sober patriot critics pointed out that Satanists are known to engage in real blood-letting and don’t generally “fake” such events, preferring the very real slaughter of little children, those who were advocates of the theory that “the Satanists” had helped conjure the Sandy Hook hoax were hard-pressed to respond.
_Others claimed there were people in Newtown who knew the whole affair was a “hoax” and wanted to speak out (or who were speaking out privately) but they didn’t want their names revealed.Those people were either being blackmailed or coerced in some fashion.
_In other words, an entire community—a town of nearly 30,000 people— was held under such control that not a single person would (or could) go public and blow the whistle and expose the hoax!
_The theory is yours to choose: Either most of the people in the town were Satanists or otherwise somehow in on the plot or most of the people were somehow being prevented from daring to speak out.
_And part of the whole big plot—so some say—is that (as we keep reminding you) there wasn’t even really a functioning school at the structure in Sandy Hook where the “phony” shooting took place.
_I kid you not.
_Those unfamiliar with all of the give-and-take that erupted on the Internet simply have no idea how truly outlandish it all became. It does get a little confusing, to be sure, but that didn’t stop people from spreading the stories.
_For God’s sake,don’t let anything stand in the way of a good story— especially if attracts traffic to your Internet website (and brings you a bundle full of cash contributions).
_On one occasion a very prominent “patriot” radio broadcaster extended his sympathies to the people of Newtown for the lives lost at Sandy Hook and then,minutes later, on the same broadcast, referred to the matter as a gigantic hoax that never happened.
_Why the broadcaster felt the need to extend his sympathy to Newtown for a tragedy that hadn’t really taken place remains a mystery (to me). But he had a lot of followers who hung on his every word.
_All of that having been said, it’s no surprise, when we continue to review the work of Gustave Le Bon—who provided the playbook for the Crisis Management Conspirators—to see that Le Bon had been able to project with absolute certainly that the insertion of wild claims into “The Crowd” would prove a perfect means of splitting the dissident movement from within.
_Le Bon described what he called“the intolerance,dictatorialness and conservatism of crowds,” and recognizing this factor, the Crisis Management Conspirators played this phenomenon to the hilt.
_These malicious manipulators knew full well that the moment cautious, detail-oriented, fact-focused researchers questioned the disinformation and nonsense that this would enrage those in“The Crowd” who had been coopted into what had essentially become a Sandy Hook Cult. Here’s how Le Bon put it:
_Crowds are only cognisant of simple and extreme sentiments; the opinions, ideas, and beliefs suggested to them are accepted or rejected as a whole, and considered as absolute truths or as not less absolute errors.
_This is always the case with beliefs induced by a process of suggestion instead of engendered by reasoning.
_Every one is aware of the intolerance that accompanies religious beliefs, and of the despotic empire they exercise on men’s minds.
_Being in doubt as to what constitutes truth or error, and having,on the other hand, a clear notion of its strength, a crowd is as disposed to give authoritative effect to its inspirations as it is intolerant.
_An individual may accept contradiction and discussion; a crowd will never do so. At public meetings the slightest contradiction on the part of an orator is immediately received with howls of fury and violent invective, soon followed by blows, and expulsion should the orator stick to his point.
_And just as LeBon had suggested, those honest truth seekers who dared to question the fallacious (and patently ridiculous) stories that had been injected into discussion of Sandy Hook came under the most intense fire from otherwise good people—and the Crisis Management Conspirators absolutely loved it.
_As incredible as it may seem to readers who will learn of this for the first time, even those who dared to suggest that perhaps children did actually die at Sandy Hook were called “traitors” by other patriots who had bought into the disinformation being inserted into the minds of patriots via the Crisis Management Conspirators working to discredit “conspiracy theories” in any form.
_Thanks to the Orwellian manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief in Sandy Hook as having been a massive hoax was essentially being instituted as a virtual litmus test as to“who’s a real patriot and who isn’t.” Those who didn’t believe Sandy Hook was a massive hoax are denounced as having been “bribed, blackmailed, or coerced” or just having simply “changed sides.”
_Veteran patriots said they had never seen anything like it—and they recognized it was because of the influence of the Internet (or rather, the influence of those Crisis Management Conspirators who were abusing the Internet for their own insidious purposes).
_In short, Sandy Hook effectively emerged as a cult, with its own unique built-in theology that cannot be questioned. To raise any doubts about the foundation of the cult was—and still is—considered heresy. Anyone who doubted even the most unlikely portion of the Sandy Hook theories was portrayed as a “traitor to the patriot movement”—or that’s what the Crisis Management Conspirators wanted patriots to think!
_The successful introduction by the Crisis Management Conspirators of their own disinformation into the patriot movement had set in motion a very real crisis—in and of itself—in which real patriots were being crucified for standing up and calling out the real conspirators for trying to mislead patriots.
_One longtime critic of gun control was accused of lending support to pro-gun control forces because he believed children died at Sandy Hook—a total disconnect, of course, but illustrative of the kind of mindset that was taking hold.
_Another person was accused of being “pro-Obama” because he doubted some Sandy Hook theories, the apparent presumption being that since Sandy Hook took place under the hated Obama’s watch that anyone who believed the official story therefore had to be pro-Obama for believing the basic claim that a crazed lone gunman was responsible.
_(On the other hand, though,as we’ve noted, some of the others who believed that there was a bigger story to Sandy Hook believed Israel’s Mossad had carried out the crime in order to hurt President Obama whereas others believed the Mossad did so in order to help him.)
_So, as we said, choose your favorite theory—courtesy of Cass Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_It was almost like Alice in Wonderland—definitely beyond belief. If there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’s this: There’s more to the Sandy Hook story than even the most dedicated conspiracy theorists understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
_The Crisis Management Conspirators (via Internet monitoring) were able to see preciselyWHO spread the rumors via email and fromWHAT websites and sources they got their information in the first place.
_As a direct consequence of this one event and the frenzy surrounding it, the powers-that-be had an absolute first-ever 24/7 fool-proof method of monitoring communications and resources within the circles of the dissident movement.
_The Sandy Hook venture itself was just stage one in the scheme, giving them the opportunity to observe and weigh the responses of the conspiracy theorists to the actual events that had occurred and to monitor their responses to the often-illogical and contradictory tales being bandied about by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_On the broader scale, in the bigger picture, the Crisis crowd was laying the groundwork to have—in the future—a more precise, more calibrated focus on the exchange of information by the conspiracy theorists and to be able to actually dominate and direct the course of their thinking altogether. And, naturally—if necessary—to discredit them in no uncertain terms in the minds of the general population.
_Perhaps even more importantly, the Sunstein-inspired program of monitoring and manipulation now made it possible to lay the groundwork—as appropriate—in manipulating opinion during some future major event, perhaps one already well-planned in advance— another 9-11, if you will—or some scheme still in the works.
_Sandy Hook was indeed a “false flag” of the first order—and it had the ultimate impact of totally misdirecting the attention of patriots from the real forces that were laying out the misinformation that was so thoroughly misdirecting them.
_In the end, one of the most respected longtime patriot voices, Devvy Kidd, dared to put it all in perspective.On April 28, 2013, on her website at newswithviews.com,Kidd laid it on the line:
_Over the past nearly two decades,every time some horrific “event” happens,wanna be « journalists » come out of the wood work with their conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing. Bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank speculation. Irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or to get people to their web sites.
_They have zero credibility and hurt the rest of us by being lumped together. I have debunked conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I’m the bad guy for pursuing the truth! There are conspiracies and coverups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
_What a damned shame there were not more voices of caution raised while the Sandy Hook affair was in its frenzy. But there were too many people in “The Crowd” who had been captivated by the virus of manufactured conspiracy fever that had been spawned in the Mind Control laboratories of the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And, if truth be told, there were many so-called “leaders” of the would-be “truth movement” who were afraid to dissent, fearful of being called “traitors” and accused of being “agents of Barack Obama and the NewWorld Order” if they dared to say that the foolish madness inserted into the minds of truth seekers (via the machinations of the Conspiracy Management gang) was just that: a bunch of foolishness.
_The whole Sandy Hook venture was largely a “private” affair, in that the circumstances surrounding the event were essentially limited to what did—or did not—take place within the confines of that elementary school in Newtown.
_However, not long afterward—on April 15, 2013—with the very “public” event involving the Boston Marathon (on the very open and public streets of Boston) the Crisis Management Conspirators were able to fine tune what they had already honed into a specialized “science”: a tool of Orwellian manipulation of the first—and worst—order.
_With Boston, the Sunstein thesis—now a live-action, real-time project in motion, having been successfully tested with Sandy Hook—was adapted to a much bigger,more broad-ranging event that (all of the nonsensical theories accompanying it notwithstanding) had all the earmarks of having been a very real “false flag”operation of Israel’s Mossad. But, once again, the truth seekers were misdirected . . .
_The manipulation by the Crisis Management Conspirators of the events at Sandy Hook was, in retrospect, a quite logical response to the phenomenon of 9-11 truthseeking (much of it Internet-based) which, in turn, had its own antecedents in the search for the truth surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination so many years before.
_In that sense,we might suggest, there was indeed a secret connection, so to speak, between 9-11 and Sandy Hook—but it’s one that even the most fervent believers in the “big” story of Sandy Hook never realized, precisely because of the fact they had found themselves (most of them, to this day, unknowingly) caught in the web of disinformation being spun by the high-level Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And one of the biggest cons of all perpetrated upon the legitimate truth seekers was the legend of “The Crisis Actors”—mentioned earlier— that came to be an article of faith surrounding Sandy Hook and later again, even more so, following the events at the Boston Marathon.
_And as we’ve already noted (perhaps all too often) in the wake of Sandy Hook many people actually believed that there hadn’t even been any gunplay at all—that no children and no adults were shot that day, that it was all a big staged event, with the purported victims and their families (along with law enforcement) in on the deal.
_This is where the now much-discussed topic of “The Crisis Actors” was brought into play.And, in many respects, it may have been one of the most ingenious scams ever pawned off on American patriots designed to misdirect their attention.
_It was right out of Cass Sunstein’s playbook.
_During the wake of Sandy Hook, people got so distracted talking about the Crisis Actors and the claim that « Lanza was dead the day before the shooting which really didn’t happen and in which no kids were really killed, » that, in many cases, they didn’t do what they should have done: Lobby forcefully against the gun control measures that were being crafted as a consequence of the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
_Many patriots became genuinely convinced that by talking about “The Crisis Actors” that they were winning the day and convincing people of the dangers of gun control when, in fact, they were actually misdirecting good people and, for all intents and purposes,discrediting honest Americans who were opposed to gun control.
_As a result of the widespread distribution of claims that Sandy Hook was a big fraud being perpetrated by “Crisis Actors” many Americans concluded that the opponents of gun control were trouble-makers, wildeyed conspiracy theorists and just generally to be dismissed.
_That, ultimately,was the aim of the Crisis Management Conspirators. Their introduction of the concept of“CrisisActors” into the debate was part and parcel of the very real conspiracy—first outlined by Cass Sunstein—to discredit conspiracy theories in general.
_And all of this undoubtedly did immense damage to the reputation of many good patriots who opposed gun control and who were led into the trap of focusing on the Crisis Actor legend rather than on the very real and important issue at hand.
_And what is so remarkable is that, to this day, although patriotic folks who regularly discuss Sandy Hook and Boston speak in hushed (and not-so-hushed) tones about “The Crisis Actors” and the role that they supposedly played in those events, there is not one single individual who is able to say precisely “who” it was who first introduced the concept of the CrisisActors into the vernacular of the Sandy Hook truth seekers.And that is telling, in and of itself.
_We know, for example, following the JFK assassination, that it was Mark Lane who largely popularized the term“grassy knoll”—relating to the likely positioning in Dealey Plaza of one of the gunmen who fired on President Kennedy.
_But Lane himself is the first to admit that he first heard the term “grassy knoll” used by one of the assassination witnesses, Jean Hill,who used that term in an interview.And Hill herself has said that this just happened to be the particular phraseology that popped into her head in seeking a way to describe that geographic location in Dealey Plaza.
_And that’s how the term “grassy knoll” ultimately came into widespread parlance, not only in reference to the JFK assassination but also in reference to “conspiracy theories” in general.
_But there is absolutely nobody who can explain just who it was who “figured out” that Crisis Actors had been utilized as part of the Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) conspiracy.
_And the reason for that is that this whole concept of Crisis Actors having been dispatched as part of the conspiracy was a creation of the Crisis Management Conspirators themselves.
_Now let it be said that there really are people known as Crisis Actors.They do exist.They’ve been around for a while.
_However, the proponents of the Crisis Actors theory relating to Sandy Hook (and later the Boston Marathon) would have people believe that the existence of CrisisActors is some deep dark secret, that they are part of a long-standing high-level covert operation kept from the public, perhaps a creation of Homeland Security or the CIA or some combination of elements of the emerging American Police State, paid agents of the vaunted military-industrial-complex.
_It’s an exciting theory, to be sure, but the truth is that—for years—you have been able go to the Internet and find a number of Internet websites of real-life profit-making businesses that train and provide Crisis Actors who interact with government (local, state and federal) as well as private industries and enterprises in preparing to deal with crisis events of various kinds, including mass shootings, hostage situations, earthquakes, fires, riots—all manner of chaos.
_One such business engaging in the Crisis Actor industry (which is what it amounts to) is crisisactors.org.
_On the website of that company, their promotional material reads:
“Crisis Actors: Trained Players and Actors Making it Real,” stating that their mission is: “Helping schools and first responders create realistic drills, full-scale exercises, high-fidelity simulations, and interactive 3D films.” The website even includes a section called “Crisis Acting News” highlighting a variety of events in which their skills and services have been utilized (and openly publicized in newspapers and televised by broadcast outlets in local communities across the country).
_Here are just a few examples from crisisactors.org, citing Internet links to some of the newspapers and broadcast outlets that have cited the work of Crisis Actors in their particular communities.
_• Active Shooter Training At Closed Elementary School in Plymouth – Patch.com
_• Local law enforcement agencies take active shooter training – KOB.com
_• Lower Burrell police conduct ‘active shooter’ training at Burrell High School – Tribune-Review
_• HSI holding ‘active shooter’ training in NM – Alamogordo Daily News
_• Active-shooter drill to be conducted at Fulton-Montgomery Community College -WRGB
_• New Canaan To Conduct Active Shooter Drill On Thursday – The Daily Voice
_•Waterloo Schools Active Shooter Training – KGANTV
_All across the United States today there are members of local police and fire departments, emergency response units—even members of the National Guard—who have worked with CrisisActors on a regular basis.
_The existence, then, of Crisis Actors is no big secret. But it wasn’t until the Crisis Management Conspirators deliberately hyped the legend (via the Internet) that Crisis Actors were part of the conspiracy at Sandy Hook that many people became aware of their existence.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators inserted the legend of the Crisis Actors onto the Internet with the expectation that it would become a part of the lore of Sandy Hook and help add confusion and—more importantly—play a significant part in discrediting conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists in the minds of the broad general public.
_Essentially, in relation to Sandy Hook, in particular, the Crisis Actors Theory held that, for example, Robbie Parker, the father of one of the children killed at Sandy Hook,was actually a Crisis Actor.
_The claim was based on the fact that—just prior to giving a public statement expressing his horror at the loss of his child—Parker smiled and laughed and then asked if the cameras were on yet and then,while speaking, referred to written notes. Nobody who had actually lost a child under such tragic circumstances, it was proclaimed,would actually smile or laugh.Nor would they need to refer to written notes.
_Such allegations are patently ridiculous. People react differently to tragedy. Some people put on a brave face when confronted with tragedy.And most people have never been confronted with a horde of reporters and television cameras converging on their home in the wake of such an internationally-publicized tragedy in which they (and their dead child) have unwittingly become a part.
_The idea someone would need to rely on notes to speak publicly is not so outrageous.Very few people are trained in public speaking and often need notes, just as even professional speakers rely on written texts when giving their own presentations. But the fact that Robbie Parker was using notes was suddenly “proof” that he was a Crisis Actor!
_So when the Crisis Management Conspirators put out the idea that Robbie Parker was a Crisis Actor whose child hadn’t been killed, Parker began receiving threats for “play acting” and the controlled media (allied with the Crisis Management Conspirators) immediately brought this to the attention of the general public who were quite correctly horrified that “those conspiracy theorists”would actually question the grief of a mourning parent and suggest that he was “faking” his child’s death.
_What most of those who bought into the idea Parker was a Crisis Actor never seemed to consider was the point that if he was a Crisis Actor, he probably wouldn’t have needed written notes when he “performed” for the cameras. Actors—you see—rely upon their skills to remember their lines.Actors generally don’t use cue cards or at least not ones that they hold right there in front of them while speaking!
_Later, it was even alleged that Parker’s dead child was actually photographed in the presence of Barack Obama when he visited Newtown to meet with the families. In other words, that the “phony” Parker and his family (all part of the conspiracy) had brazenly dared to allow the supposedly dead child to be shown to be alive after it was said that she had been killed at Sandy Hook.
_The claim was based on the fact that the surviving sisters of the dead child bore a striking resemblance to the victim—that happens in families, you know—and that one of the children in the picture with Obama seemed to be wearing the same dress that the dead child had previously been photographed wearing.That was “proof” that it was the dead child who was, it was said, still alive.
_But any family with multiple sons or daughters knows that the clothing of older children is passed on to younger children. But then, again,when it came time to promote the idea of Crisis Actors—and the theme that “no children died at Sandy Hook”—simple points such as that seemed to get lost in the Crisis Management Conspiracy Barndance.
_In another instance, a parent of one of the dead children was accused of being a Crisis Actor because the parent said in an interview that one of his surviving children said that she wanted to urge President Obama to support gun control. No child in grade school, it was said, would be thinking about a political issue such as gun control. Especially, it was added, after one of her siblings had been killed.
_The idiocy of such a claim should be obvious. School children do have political opinions and even “vote” in mock presidential elections every four years—from first grade through graduation—even if they don’t necessarily understand the political issues.
_Young children do know who the president is and in this “Information Age” they do hear about issues such as gun control, in particular, on a 24/7 basis, whether or television or radio or even on the Internet, and especially after such a crisis as Sandy Hook.
_And it’s entirely possible that a child who had lost a sibling at a school shooting would want to express her concerns about gun control to “the president” who is perceived as the man who rules America and who makes important decisions about big issues such as gun control.
_In fact, they said, a lot of the well-known Sandy Hook personalities featured in the media were actors—why, they never even lived in Sandy Hook at all! (Just as they had said that the school was not even a functioning school at the time of the purported shooting!)
_Various cuts of what is called“raw”media footage of one Sandy Hook celebrity—a notably obnoxious character named Gene Rosen (a veritable stereotype for a particular type of Jewish caricature often seen in Hollywood comedy)—telling bits and pieces of what he claimed to have seen, was cited as proof Rosen had “practiced” his lines (like an actor) and that the story he was telling was just not true.
_Rosen—who was clearly a publicity hound who reveled in his brief brush with the proverbial “15 minutes of fame”—was over-the-top to the point of being annoying and—in fact—the media people who had interviewed Rosen had taped him at various moments and Rosen was clearly fine-tuning, even rehearsing what he was about to say in the various “cuts” of the raw footage that later popped up on the Internet.
_As such it was immediately insinuated that Rosen was a Crisis Actor dispatched by the powers-that-be to craft a bit of film propaganda for the benefit of the American public to help perpetrate the“lie” that there had been a shooting at the school.
_But here is what is important to remember . . .
_What all of the patriot conspiracy theorists seemed to miss was this big question: How was it that this raw footage—taped by a cameramen from the Controlled Media—just happened to be leaked to the conspiracy theorists as “proof” that Rosen was a Crisis Actor?
_Clearly, there were people in the Controlled Media—in league with the Crisis Management Conspirators—who were deliberately helping propagate the legend of the Crisis Actors by leaking raw footage such as this.
_They knew with absolute certainty that the people in “The Crowd” who had bought into the CrisisActors theory would jump on the Rosen story in a heartbeat.And that is precisely what they did.
In the end, you see, the real CrisisActors were not the parents of the murdered children (or even the ridiculous Gene Rosen).
_Instead the Crisis Actors were actually those “cyber shills” (posing as “truth seekers”) who were acting out a very specific role—acting on behalf of the Crisis Management Conspirators—in bombarding the Internet with all of the outlandish stories that distracted patriots and truth seekers from the big picture and thereby helping discredit all forms of conspiracy theories (and conspiracy theorists) in general.
_It’s just so damned obvious.
_In fact, it’s typical Zionist Israeli trickery:
_(1) Operating in plain sight;
_(2) Standing there in vampire’s garb,pointing at someone dressed as an angel, and shouting,“There’s the vampire over there!” and
_(3) Thoroughly distracting everyone from the big picture.
This frequent Zionist tactic of accusing others of what they are in fact guilty of has been aptly described as “accusatory projection” or “accusatory inversion.”
_The Crisis Actors theme got ever more ridiculous as the story was repeated again and again.At one point it was even claimed a catering truck—said to be on the scene at Sandy Hook—had been dispatched to cater food and beverages for the Crisis Actors at work perpetuating the conspiracy, just as—it was pointed out—catering trucks will be found on the scene when Hollywood films are being made “on location.”
_I’ve personally seen one of these catering trucks parked just a few blocks from my own home on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. when actor Clint Eastwood was filming a rooftop chase scene for his action film In the Line of Fire.Despite this, however, I sincerely doubt that the Sandy Hook “conspiracy” was so fine-tuned that the conspirators sent a catering truck to keep the Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook well nourished.
_Yet, I am here to tell you that the Crisis Management Conspirators managed to convince a lot of well meaning people that this is actually what really happened. (Oh, those nasty caterers—conspirators all!)
_And here’s something about the Crisis Actors disinformation that needs to be mentioned—and this will astound many readers who will learn about this for the first time . . .
_In fact, one of the most vociferous proponents of the Crisis Actors theory—a character who uses the name “DallasGoldbug”—also put forth the following assertions regarding other “actors” he claims to have discovered posturing in the public arena:
_• John F. Kennedy did not die in Dallas but reinvented himself as future president Jimmy Carter;
_• A single woman posed as not only actress Marilyn Monroe but also former First Ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and Rosalyn Carter;
_• Former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was really country and western singer Tex Ritter;
_• Billionaire David Rockefeller is actually popular conspiracy theorist Jordan Maxwell;
_• David Rockefeller, Jr. is another popular conspiracy theorist William Cooper (who was killed by police in 2001);
_• Famed country singer Patsy Cline posed as Marina Oswald, the wife of JFK’s accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald;
_• Comic actor Chevy Chase poses as Sen. Jay Rockefeller;
_• Former Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo is now posing as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” Joe Arpaio of Arizona;
_• Infamous Nazi figure Adolf Eichmann was really the popular singer and motion picture star Bing Crosby; and
_• No less than Adolf Hitler was actually Walt Disney.
_And here are three of my personal favorites from“Dallas Goldbug” involving three individuals whom I have known quite well:
_•Nelson Rockefeller’s son, Rodman, poses as veteran JFK assassination researcher Mark Lane;
_• Famed former State Rep. David Duke, is actually a Hollywood actor named Thomas Haden Church; and _•Actor JonathanWinters posed as longtime American Free Press “Bilderberg Hound” James P. Tucker, Jr.;
_DallasGoldbug posted “convincing” video and photographic evidence that“proved”these contentions,yet many who were caught up in the claims about Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston had no idea that the Crisis Actors story was also inextricably linked to this lunacy.
_In fact, Gustave LeBon—the grand guru of the the Crisis Management Conspirators—had described how the “crowd” could be dazzled by all sorts of images and in the aftermath of the Boston Maraton bombing, “The Crowd” of our modern day was indeed captivated by dazzling images which they believed “proved” that there had been hanky panky on the streets of Boston.
_In fact, many « truth seekers » picked up the stories being put out by the phony patriots—the Crisis Actors working for the Sunstein gang—that there wasn’t even really any bombing at all! It was akin to the claim—which had already proven successful in winning credence with the real patriots—that there hadn’t even been a shooting at Sandy Hook.
_And while the whole story of what really happened at Boston has yet to be unraveled,what we do know is that two young Muslims (the Tsarnaev brothers) were accused of the crime—yet another Muslim “false flag” akin to the 9-11 tragedy.
_And we also know that evidence indicates that the intelligence services of the United States,Russia—and certainly Israel—had their eyes on the Tsarnaevs for a long time prior to the bombing, just as the ADL and other Israeli-connected elements were “monitoring” Timothy McVeigh prior to the Oklahoma City bombing.
_However—at this juncture—we don’t know the entire scenario, but we do know there has been a lot of disinformation put into circulation designed to deflect attention away from Israel which is certainly (beyond question) the prime beneficiary of the crime as a consequence of the purported danger from the Muslim world continuing to be in the forefront of the mind (and concerns) of the American people.
_In short, Boston was simply a replay of the 9-11 false flag that redirected American thinking in the wake of that tragedy.
_It was a reinvigoration of the template for terror utilized in 9-11 and in the Oklahoma bombing and in the JFK assassination involving, yet again, the widespread dissemination of carefully-crafted disinformation designed to cover Israeli involvement in those acts of terror.
_(For my own part, from the beginning, it has been my opinion that Israel was behind the Boston bombing for the precise purpose of conjuring up another Muslim“false flag.” I expressed this view in a broadcast interview at theuglytruth.wordpress.com with Mark Glenn who shares my view on this matter.)
_Yet, the Crisis Management Conspirators successfully distracted truth seekers—who were convinced that, once again, the authorities were covering up the truth about the Boston bombing—by cranking up the Crisis _Actors legend (first spawned in the wake of Sandy Hook).
_Rather than focusing on who was behind the bombing, truth seekers focused instead on stories—with accompanying videos and photographic images of the chaos following the bombing—planted on the Internet in conjunction with the insistent claim that Crisis Actors were busy on the streets of Boston detaching false arms and legs and faking injuries and throwing around buckets of stage blood for the benefit of video cameras.
_All of the imagery captured the attention of the patriots who suddenly showed little—if any—interest in trying to determine who was responsible for the Muslim “false flag” that the Controlled Media was waving in the face of a horrified American public.
_Here is how Le Bon described precisely this kind of manipulation.
_Crowds being only capable of thinking in images are only to be impressed by images. It is only images that terrify or attract them and become motives of action.
_For this reason theatrical representations, in which the image is shown in its most clearly visible shape, always have an enormous influence on crowds. Bread and spectacular shows constituted for the plebeians of ancient Rome the ideal of happiness, and they asked for nothing more.
_Throughout the successive ages this ideal has scarcely varied. Nothing has a greater effect on the imagination of crowds of every category than theatrical representations.
_The entire audience experiences at the same time the same emotions, and if these emotions are not at once transformed into acts, it is because the most unconscious spectator cannot ignore that he is the victim of illusions, and that he has laughed or wept over imaginary adventures.
_Le Bon realized—and the Crisis Management Conspirators recognized that he was absolutely correct—that these kind of images were ideal for the purpose of Crowd Control and mass manipulation:
_Whatever strikes the imagination of crowds presents itself under the shape of a startling and very clear image, freed from all accessory explanation, or merely having as accompaniment a few marvellous or mysterious facts: examples in point are a great victory, a great miracle, a great crime, or a great hope. Things must be laid before the crowd as a whole, and their genesis must never be indicated.
_A hundred petty crimes or petty accidents will not strike the imagination of crowds in the least, whereas a single great crime or a single great accident will profoundly impress them, even though the results be infinitely less disastrous than those of the hundred small accidents put together.
_In the wake of Boston, the theme of “Crisis Actors” got further (and quite considerable) mileage with the use of such imagery.With Le Bon’s assertions about “The Crowd”—and its susceptibility to incorporating such images into its thinking—the Crisis Management gang kept conspiracy theorists busy.
_One widely circulated proof of the “conspiracy” was a selection of several frames from a video of the bombing. A few frames were “analyzed”—a few frames that represented just a few seconds of time—and were “found” to show a woman (said to be a Crisis Actor) “giving hand signs” and helping other Crisis Actors fake blood and injuries.
_To do all of this—live—before very REAL people who were not Crisis Actors but who WERE on the scene, would take more than seconds to accomplish successfully.
_Anyone who has ever participated in the taping of a television show or even an amateur home movie—let alone a serious film production—knows how much time and work is involved making just one “incident” look real, -and that it can’t be accomplished in just seconds!
_But most people—including a lot of good patriots—have never been involved in any such production and don’t have any idea that even one second in, for example, an old-style 8mm movie, can amount to as many as 18 different frames. Meaning, of course, that those who were microanalyzing the films that they said “proved” there had been fakery were actually analyzing milli-seconds, for God’s sake!
_Such simple facts were lost in the “Crisis Actors Shuffle” that accompanied the frenzy over the Boston bombing.
_A lot of good patriots fell into what we might call, for want of a better way of describing it,“the Trap of Belief,” because they had become familiar, in years past, with people who were quite accurately and correcting analyzing the famous (although remarkably brief) bit of film known as the Zapruder Film of the JFK assassinaton.
_Again and again over the years a variety of analysts had de-constructed the film, frame by frame, to demonstrate the point that it was clear, on film, that the official Warren Commission version of the JFK assassination was repudiated by what purported to be an actual amateur 8mm film taken at the time of the JFK assassination.
_(Now, ironically, there are those who say that Zapruder film itself is some sort of forgery or an altered version of the original film or even a combination of several films made to appear to be one.And the truth is that past and present technology does make such things possible.)
_As such, having seen (over some 50 years) such analysis of the Zapruder film (and other images of the JFK assassination) again and again, on video, on the Internet, in books and magazines, patriots and truth seekers became accustomed to this technique of conspiracy inquiry.And knowing that this was the case, following Sandy Hook and Boston, the Crisis Management Conspirators went assiduously to work and deliberately played on this when they began hyping the claims that Crisis Actors had staged false injuries (in a fake bombing) for the benefit of the American population at large.
_The consequence of this was that when honest truth-seekers began circulating the stories that videos of the bombing were “fakes,” many serious-minded folks in the general public began to think, quite frankly, that these truth seekers were just plain crazy.
_There were people from all over the United States who had come to the Boston Marathon and they went home to tell friends and family about their narrow brush with disaster,only to hear that there were conspiracy theorists on the Internet who were saying that the bombing didn’t happen and that nobody really lost an arm or a leg.
_And the“proof”was a few seconds of one film that went viral on the Internet which convinced the truth seekers that it was all a big lie!
_If you have any doubts about this, go out and purchase a DVD of some current“action”film and listen to the director’s commentary.You’ll learn how, for example, one scene in a Hollywood film which occupies just a second or two (on film) can actually take up to as much as two or three days to film (sometimes on multiple locations,no less) not to mention the introduction of a wide array of computer-generated imagery and other technological advances,many of which didn’t even exist as little as ten or fifteen years ago.
_Did you really think that was a big ship sinking in the middle of the North Atlantic in James Cameron’s classic film Titanic?
_Did you really think that real people were falling down and hurting themselves as the ship sank?
_Of course you didn’t!
_In fact, some of the most mundane moments in that wide-ranging disaster film were actually the work of clever Hollywood legerdemain.
_Even the relatively brief and simple scene of the film’s romantic duo—Kate Winslett and Leonardo DiCaprio—at the stern of the ship whenWinslett’s character is threatening to jump overboard and commit suicide involved endless hours of filming using several different stages and multiple means of technological wizardry.
_If you were among those who were caught up in the legends surrounding Crisis Actors at the Boston Marathon and the stories on the Internet purporting to analyze just a moment or two of the events that took place there, then read that preceding paragraph again—no, in fact, read it twice—and consider the ramifications . . .
_As we said—and this is critical to understand—the point is that even a moment of drama on film can take literally days to produce and simply can not be carried out in just a few split seconds.
But those Crisis Management Conspirators who have been purveying the Crisis Actors false flag to mislead truth seekers know that most people have no idea how technologically advanced film-making has become, even at the same time it remains time-consuming and requires vast participation by multiple people at various levels So, then, in the context of the events at the Boston Marathon,what does all of this mean?
_It’s very simple . . .
_If the conspirators behind the events in Boston wanted to produce a piece of film to convince unwittingAmericans that a bombing did take place which injured many people—including those who lost arms and legs—they did not have to dispatch hordes of “Crisis Actors” onto the scene to engage in complicated motions of “reacting” to a bomb and then rolling about on the crowd pretending to be injured, hysterically clinging to severed arms and legs, throwing about fake blood, etc.
_That just isn’t how it works.
_IF there HAD been a major conspiracy to « fake » all of these things, the whole process COULD (and WOULD) have been done beforehand using high-tech computer generated images produced in a laboratory.
_The so-called Crisis Actors didn’t even have to be ANYWHERE NEAR the bomb site and positioned where « honest witnesses » could have seen anything suspicious such as what has been claimed to have happened.
_For serious truth seekers—particularly those who were caught up in the legend of Crisis Actors at Boston who were purportedly busy faking injuries, throwing around fake blood, detaching prosthetic legs and arms, etc—a careful review of the wide-ranging “special features” section of the DVD of James Cameron’s Titanic is well worth their time.
_And the truth is that since Cameron’s classic first appeared on the screen in 1997—16 years ago—computer technology has grown by extraordinary leaps and bounds, such that Cameron’s own remarkable visual graphics in Titanic are, in many respects, almost extraordinarily antiquated by many new developments in the field.
_In fact, the “special features” section of virtually any DVD of any motion picture or television drama—especially those involving a lot of action—often provide a literal step-by-step videographic run-down of the amazing techniques of film-making, in particular the amazing CGI—computer-generated imagery—that has become so prevalent in even the most minimal ways that the average viewer would never expect.
_For example, on the DVD of the third season of the now-defunct crime drama,Body of Proof, one can see how outdoor scenes (filmed in Los Angeles but supposedly taking place in Philadelphia) are altered via CGI to eliminate palm trees from the image that is finally seen by the television viewer. Another scene deconstructed on that DVD demonstrates how the image (and sound) of a railroad train moving through a railroad yard is completely erased by CGI, such that all of the other action (and sound) taking place remains undisturbed.
_In other words, film-making technology has reached such a highly-advanced level that:
_• Virtually any scene or event can practically be conjured out of almost thin air.What appears to be a human speaking and moving about may, in fact, be a CGI, or even a robot with a talking, smiling human face imposed by computer upon it.
_• Any piece of real film imagery can be so altered that the final version of the film completely eliminates action that did take place or altered to include action that actually took place elsewhere and was then inserted by computer onto that imagery.
_Now—when confronted with such realities about the nature of film production and how quite ridiculous it is to suggest that Crisis Actors engaged in such complex (and quite unnecessary) on-site antics in Boston—a lot of red-faced truth seekers (who do realize they have been conned) fall back on the claim that the high-level conspirators behind Boston deliberately staged faulty video presentations that were easily “refutable” because—they say—the conspirators actually wanted the American people to know that the Boston bombing was a hoax.
_The apparent underlying theme here is that “Nothing is for real.
Everything is a lie. And the people who are responsible for these lies actually do want people to know that they are lies.That the people can do nothing to combat this conspiracy that operates in tandem with the Controlled Media in America.”
_That sounds good. It has a certain appeal to a certain mindset. But it doesn’t reflect the reality that, in fact, most Americans simply do not have any idea that the Internet is rife with rumors about Crisis Actors.
_But what a growing number of Americans do believe—as a consequence f propaganda from the Controlled Media—is that those people who are called “conspiracy theorists” by the media have some really crazy ideas and that they don’t believe that there was really a shooting in Sandy Hook that took the lives of 20 little children or that there wasn’t even really a bombing in Boston.
_And many Americans now believe that anything that reeks of a conspiracy theory—even relating to the JFK assassination or the Oklahoma bombing or 9-11—is the work of paranoid minds whose opinions are to be dismissed, along with (in particular) the idea that Israel had anything to do with those tragedies.
_That was precisely the design of those who helped make the truth seekers look “crazy” by feeding them a diet of extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook and Boston that took hold on the Internet like wildfire, even as the Crisis Management Conspirators were monitoring the communication networks between patriots here in the United States (and around the world) who were disseminating these stories.
_The bottom line is that what many came to believe about Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston (along with other similar nonsense) is just one big fat fraud—a lie—a distraction—deliberately perpetrated by the Crisis Management Conspirators to make truth seekers look silly.
_The real “BIG STORY” that has not yet set in or been realized and understood is this:
_The Crowd Control (and very real Mind Control) tactics—first laid out by Cass Sunstein—have been successfully set in motion and the long-term damage to serious inquiry into very real conspiracies—past and present and those of the future—has been costly and inestimable.
_We can only imagine what will happen when another very real crisis comes along and wonder what kind of “management”—or mismanagement as the case may be—will occur.We can only ponder the manner in which truth seekers will be once again be utterly misdirected and further marginalized.
_What happened with Sandy Hook and Boston is a very real lesson America’s “alternative” media should learn from—before it’s too late.