L’homme qui se dit « le juif le plus riche du monde », Sheldon Adelson, donnera « tout ce qu’il faudra » pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama

 


Sheldon Adelson reportedly has said he will donate « whatever it takes » to defeat President Obama  – JTA

Après avoir financé Newt Gingrich à coups de dizaines de millions, il finance maintenant Mitt Romney, le candidat de Lady Lynn Rothschild. Tout pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama.

Sheldon Adelson gave a pro-Mitt Romney super-PAC $10 million – JTA

Adelson’s Pro-Romney Donations Will Be ‘Limitless,’ Could Top $100M

Mitt Romney met with Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino magnate who took aim at Romney’s presidential campaign by substantially backing challenger Newt Gingrich.

Romney says he will do the ‘opposite’ of Obama on Israel – JTA

La politique israélienne de Mitt Romney sera contraire aux actions d’Obama

Most Israelis think Romney would be ‘friendlier’

L’ANTISEMITE (Barack Obama)

‘Obama’s Attitude Towards Pollard Proves His Anti-Semitism’

Republicans: Israelis first to see Obama faults–Ari Fleischer says Israelis lack of support for Obama was harbinger of reduced US Jewish support for Obama.

Romney aide to Haaretz: After he’s elected, Iran will see there’s a new sheriff in town

Ron Paul Supporters Are Really Pissed That Rand Paul Endorsed Mitt Romney

America Last: Will Zionist Pressure Force Rand to Rewrite Ron’s America-First Foreign Policy?

Romney’s post-Tish’a B’Av faux pas, Sheldon Adelson’s ‘tainted money’ Romney’s embattled Israel fundraiser Even before landing in Israel as part of a foreign trip that includes Britain,…

Zionist casino mogul Sheldon Adelson rocks Israeli media

NYTIMES: What Sheldon Adelson Wants

TUT Pod-Broadcast June 18, 2012

Romney would to the ‘exact opposite’ as Obama when it comes to Israel.

Mark Dankof joins the program to discuss this and other relevant items.

Download Here

See online:

<iframe width= »420″ height= »315″ src= »http://www.youtube.com/embed/kVAj35q2Vzo » frameborder= »0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

 

The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

June 26, 2012   AFP

Sheldon Adelson: The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

By Michael Collins Piper

Those who want to see Barack Obama out of the White House have a tough, no-holds-barred ally in Las Vegas-and Israel-based billionaire gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson, who some call “the modern-day Meyer Lansky,” recalling the longtime head of the national crime syndicate.

The New York Times reported on June 17 that Adelson—a key ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is himself a close, longtime friend of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney—has said he is prepared to spend $100M of his own money this year to defeat Obama and help elect Republicans.

SHELDON ADELSON & LYNN DE ROTHSCHILD
Two of the big names working to oust Obama

Adelson’s friend Fred Zeidman—a prominent figure in the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and a major player in the GOP in Texas—told the Times that Adelson is “fully committed to beating Barack Obama,” adding that the $100M Adelson is willing to spend is “a meaningless amount of money” to super-rich Adelson.

Reportedly worth some $25B, Adelson once referred to himself as “the richest Jew in the world.”

This past year, the American-born gambling chief and his Israeli wife gave $20M to a so-called superPAC supporting the presidential ambitions of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who loudly echoed Adelson’s hard-line support for Israel.

A superPAC refers to a new breed of political action committee that was spawned from an infamous 2010 Supreme Court ruling, which allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections. With federal election law loopholes in place, superPACs can avoid disclosing the names of their contributors. But unlike regular PACs, superPACs cannot donate funds directly to politicians. What they do is hire propagandists, and spend their millions buying commercials on television and placing advertisements in newspapers backing one politician over another.

Now the casino kingpin is going all out to make sure the GOP not only take theWhite House but also Congress, leading the Times to refer to Adelson’s “growing role as one of the country’s leading political financiers”—referring to Adelson’s clout here in America, rather than to his equally considerable impact in Israel.

Adelson has not only pledged an additional $10M to a superPAC supporting Mitt Romney but he has also dropped $5M into the  coffers of the Congressional Leadership Fund, a superPAC that supports GOP candidates for Congress.

And it has been reported that Adelson has given even more millions to other superPACs, some $5M going to Young Guns, a front for Rep. Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who shares Adelson’s devotion to Israel, as well as $10M to the Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies run by GOP operative Karl Rove. He has even talked of handing $10M to fellow billionaires Charles and David Koch, key figures behind the tea party movement, to assist in their pro-GOP endeavors.

If Adelson lives up to his promises, this is just the start.

Adelson joins Lady Lynn Forrester de Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a member of the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in lining up behind Romney, another of the big names who says “Obama must go.”

Recently, Leslie Gelb, the former president of the CFR, complained to writer Edward Klein, author of the new book The Amateur (highly critical of Obama) that no president had taken more personal control over foreign policy than Obama. Klein quoted Gelb as having stated:

“This is an Obama-centric decision-making operation. In other administrations, a lot of decisions were made below the presidential level. But Obama shapes most policies. He takes pen to paper and writes decision papers. Usually presidents have other things to do than sit down and write a document that takes an inordinate amount of time. But Obama makes the calls on most every subject and with a degree of personal intensity.”

Klein suggests that Obama’s policies—especially his stance toward Israel—are “a rupture with the past” betraying the bipartisan consensus forged on foreign policy issues and carried out by officials in Republican and Democratic administrations alike.

That Klein is also taking on Obama may spell a public relations danger to the president.

Klein has been a key figure in three of the most powerful Zionist media dynasties: He was editor-in chief of The New York Times Magazine, published by the Sulzberger family; former foreign editor of Newsweek, published by the Meyer-Graham family (of Washington Post fame); and is the author of the “Walter Scott” column in the weekly Parade, owned by S.I. Newhouse, who famously saved then-Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) from election defeat by cutting off “Jewish lobby” money to Helms’s opponent, after which Helms became fervently pro-Israeli.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

No More No-Win Wars
• Is Obama the reason we haven’t attacked Iran?

By Willis A. Carto
There are many things that an alert American may criticize President Barack Obama for, but these failings are not the subject of this commentary. Instead, we wish to congratulate him for his surprising statesmanship and guts for resisting the Israeli lobby in a matter of vital national interest.
No one may doubt that what Israel wants, Israel gets. It is estimated by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, the authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, that Israel has received more than $140 billion in financial and other benefits from U.S. taxpayers since 1949. And yet, in spite of this proof of Israel’s political power in this “democracy,” President Obama has so far rejected Israel’s efforts to do the one thing that Israel craves above everything else—to attack Iran.
Israel-firsters (and by the use of this term the Judeo-Christians under the sway of such racketeers as John Hagee must be included) claim Iran is an existential threat to Israel. At any moment, they fear, Iran will lob hundreds of missiles at the poor Israelis. Iran must be stopped before it’s too late.
And Israel must have the full cooperation—monetary as well as military—of the United States to forestall or avenge this fate.
But here’s the rub. Has Obama turned a deaf ear to the Israel-firsters? Could he be cognizant of the advice of this country’s Founding Father, George Washington and the other God-inspired men who created this nation, to avoid foreign wars? Could Obama actually be rejecting the internationalists, such as Mitt Romney, John McCain, Joe Lieberman and other war maniacs and acting in the best interests of America, and damn the industrialists, bankers and lunatics who want perpetual war for America?
Could Obama realize that an American attack on Iran—even if Israel could procure the consent of Congress—would be a strategic disaster for this nation no matter if endorsed by multitudes of TV talking heads and scribblers who can be counted to bark obediently every time Israel gives the signal?
Such an attack would beyond question constitute the greatest no-win war yet for our country.
Such an attack would mean bombing Tehran and other Iranian cities with nuclear warheads. This would be a major atrocity and war crime. We would kill many thousands of Persians but only an invasion by infantry wins wars, and deploying a minimum of 15 million infantrymen (not girls and fairies) along with sufficient tanks, cannon, rockets, airplanes, ammunition and materiel to do the
job would be impossible, as would be our Navy  aking control of the Persian Gulf.
An attempted invasion of Iran would be the greatest favor we could possibly do for Russia and China. U.S. embarrassment at the outcome of such an ill-conceived venture would follow, and Russia and China could be counted on to rub it in on the international stage. Goodbye, American prestige and all the billions the taxpayers have contributed for the past 50 years to make people love us. 
——
Willis A. Carto is a longtime nationalist writer and editor, who has also published hundreds of books of interest to populists. He was the founder of LIBERTY LOBBY and is currently the editor of THE BARNES REVIEW (TBR) history magazine. If you’ve never seen TBR, write P.O. Box 15877,Washington, D.C. 20003 for a free sample issue.

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

May 28, 2012   AFP

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

Conservatives, radicals, centrists, birthers, Zionists join to challenge president

By Michael Collins Piper

Barack Obama’s fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of his biggest critics, one of the world’s richest, most powerful women—Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London—has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed “centrist” third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35M in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild—the American-born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right—had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP’s nominee.

While AE postured as a “grass-roots” effort to break partisan gridlock in America, the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—of which she is a member—had set AE in motion in the first place.

The intent of such a centrist party at the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles.

While Lady de Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman—a fervent internationalist—for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19—while both promoting Huntsman’s aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE’s centrist party efforts—Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew.

Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which, at that point, was still not assured.

On Jan. 13, the Post—owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschilds—reported Lady de Rothschild’s endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as “a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle.”

Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrist third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.

Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too “ideological” (that is, too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschilds’ golden boy.

As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild’s worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010, writing on the Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.” Accusing Obama of being “beholden to the left,” Lady de Rothschild said he had “misled” the American people during the 2008 campaign about his “real plans for America.” She added that “his cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives.”

In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrist movement—along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populist and nationalist challenger from GOP ranks.

As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at The Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party—representing what she called “the radical center”—would “take on all the vested interests and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington.”

Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschilds, the “birther” movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hardline Zionists, as well as many self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives” and others—are joining behind Romney—long seen as a “moderate” and “centrist” and even as a “liberal”—to put Obama out of the White House.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

 

 

 

‘American Exceptionalism’ Just More NWO Rhetoric

  By Michael Collins Piper

During the 2012 election campaign, you’ll probably be hearing a lot about “American exceptionalism,” particularly from the Republican presidential candidates. Newt Gingrich has made the concept a centerpiece of his campaign, and Gingrich’s wife—the current one, that is—has produced a documentary on the topic. Mitt Romney’s campaign book is entitled No Apology: The Case for American Greatness. Sarah Palin’s book, America by Heart, has a chapter entitled “America the Exceptional.” And former Sen. Rick Santorum and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty have also been heard touting the topic.

But don’t be fooled by rhetoric that has a lot of patriotic appeal. In fact, the concept of American exceptionalism— and a related theme known as national greatness conservatism—are really modern-day propaganda masks for old-fashioned Trotskyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism now wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government.

Many call it the New World Order. The wizards who conjured up these themes are three key figures in the so-called neo-conservative movement:

(read the rest…)

 

 

 

 

Plus d’infos:

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

Sheldon Adelson: « je suis le juif le plus riche au monde »

Le père du PNAC William Kristol prédit que Joe Lieberman sera nommé secrétaire d’État par l’administration Romney

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d’un journal juif américain, soutient qu’il ne prônait pas vraiment l’assassinat d’Obama

Selon Frank J. Gaffney (PNAC), les Frères Musulmans ont infiltré et contrôlent l’administration Obama

Le mouvement des Birthers ou Quand les Patriotes font le travail de Netanyahou…

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Le père du PNAC William Kristol prédit que Joe Lieberman sera nommé secrétaire d’État par l’administration Romney

 

Kristol: Lieberman will be Secretary of State in Romney Administration

By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
May 19, 2012

On Tuesday at Manhattan’s B’nai Jeshurun Synagogue during a debate with J Street founder and President Jeremy Ben-Ami, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol predicted that the next U.S. Secretary of State in a Romney administration would be Senator Joe Lieberman.

Although Kristol is typically wrong in his rosy predictions about the outcome of the many wars of “Muslim liberation” in which he has advocated American involvement, he is far more reliable when it comes to forecasting GOP political appointments. On June 30, 2008, Kristol confidently predicted on Fox News that Senator John McCain would select Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate. Kristol had discovered the then Alaska governor a year earlier, when a cruise hosted by The Weekly Standard set anchor in Juneau, and from then on relentlessly promoted her in the media and to the McCain campaign.

If Kristol’s latest prediction comes true, a Romney presidency would put U.S. foreign policy even more firmly under the control of a foreign power. As Mark Vogel, chairman of the largest pro-Israel Political Action Committee (PAC), once said:

Joe Lieberman, without exception, no conditions … is the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in Congress. There is nobody who does more on behalf of Israel than Joe Lieberman.

As for what Lieberman has done for the people he is supposed to represent, I wrote in “Guess Who Wants to Kill the Internet?“:

It would be hard to think of anyone who has done more to undermine American freedoms than Joseph Lieberman. Since 9/11, the Independent senator from Connecticut has introduced a raft of legislation in the name of the “global war on terror” which has steadily eroded constitutional rights. If the United States looks increasingly like a police state, Senator Lieberman has to take much of the credit for it.

 

A Vote for Romney is a Vote for Israel

By Philip Giraldi
The Passionate Attachment
May 23, 2012

There are some strange things going on relating to US foreign policy and Israel that you will not see in the mainstream media. A recent Rasmussen poll suggests that most Americans (53%) are closer to Ron Paul on the need to get out of Afghanistan immediately than they are to the views of either Obama or Romney, who respectively prefer a long somewhat disingenuous disengagement and continuing the war until, improbably, all terrorists are dead. But in spite of their popularity, Ron Paul’s views will be invisible in November’s election.
At the same time, even though Paul is genuinely out of the running for president, his campaign has clearly built up a grassroots presence at state and local levels that will be difficult for the Republican National Committee to deny unless it resorts to extensive vote-rigging or mass exclusion of freely elected representatives. Both are quite possible and have already been employed at local levels to isolate Paul. Nearly all of the activists now entering government support Paul’s call for an end to foreign aid, which is, of course, anathema to Israel and its friends.

 

Meanwhile over at the Tea Parties, there is roughly a fifty-fifty split over issues like Israel. Some support the Israel connection as part of the chest-thumping desire for an assertive US response to the rest of the world (the Sarah Palin wing) while those who are serious about fiscal and government downsizing recognize that Israel is part of the problem, supporting the two Pauls. How this will play out over the next two years is anyone’s guess, but the whole issue of Israel and its relationship with the US is now on the table.

How the Israel Lobby will react to the dilemma is unclear. Neocon Cheshire cat Bill Kristol’s prediction that his buddy Joe Lieberman will become Secretary of State in a Romney administration would solve the problem as continuing aid to Israel, in one form or another, would be untouched. The aid might well be rolled into the annual Defense budget, already accomplished with the Iron Dome supplement for 2013-4, as Eric Cantor has already proposed as a permanent solution. But the Tea Party/Paul pressure on bloated budgets and foreign aid conceptually will not go away and you can be sure that AIPAC will be working hard to distinguish assistance to our good friend and faithful ally Israel from all other foreign entitlements. And also working hard to elect Romney, a foreign policy parvenu, who has surrounded himself with neocon advisers including John Bolton, Robert Kagan and Dan Senor.

Philip Giraldi is the executive director of the Council for the National Interest and a recognized authority on international security and counterterrorism issues.

 

 

AMERICAN FREE PRESS

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

May 28, 2012   AFP
Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

Conservatives, radicals, centrists, birthers, Zionists join to challenge president

By Michael Collins Piper


Barack Obama’s fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of his biggest critics, one of the world’s richest, most powerful women—Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London—has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed “centrist” third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35M in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild—the American-born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right—had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP’s nominee.

While AE postured as a “grass-roots” effort to break partisan gridlock in America, the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—of which she is a member—had set AE in motion in the first place.

The intent of such a centrist party at the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles.

While Lady de Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman—a fervent internationalist—for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19—while both promoting Huntsman’s aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE’s centrist party efforts—Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew.

Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which, at that point, was still not assured.

On Jan. 13, the Post—owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschilds—reported Lady de Rothschild’s endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as “a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle.”

Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrist third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.

Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too “ideological” (that is, too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschilds’ golden boy.

As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild’s worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010, writing on the Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.” Accusing Obama of being “beholden to the left,” Lady de Rothschild said he had “misled” the American people during the 2008 campaign about his “real plans for America.” She added that “his cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives.”

In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrist movement—along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populist and nationalist challenger from GOP ranks.

As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at The Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party—representing what she called “the radical center”—would “take on all the vested interests and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington.”

Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschilds, the “birther” movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hardline Zionists, as well as many self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives” and others—are joining behind Romney—long seen as a “moderate” and “centrist” and even as a “liberal”—to put Obama out of the White House.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:.

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

Netanyahu Ties to Romney

The Intel Hub
By Shepard Ambellas
April 8, 2012

The next presidential election is approaching as the candidates are beating each other to a pulp in the battlefield known as the political arena. So far it has been your typical down and dirty race as we are starting to see some pre positioning by certain power structures in control.

What we do know at this time is that Barrack Obama is heavily funded, signifying a clear choice by the powers that be that he will most likely be installed for a second term against the American peoples votes and wishes as voter fraud and electronic ballots have been known to sway results.

In fact Obama’s funding topped $172 million dollars back in January compared to Mitt Romney’s $72 million and some change, not counting what he had left over from the previous election.

However, it has now came out in a recent piece by the New York Times that presidential candidate Mitt Romney has ties to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dating back as far as 1976, and has recently received a personal phone call from Netanyahu.

The article details the fact that there is more to the relationship than a mere friendship and how it could raise a few eyebrows.

A New York Times article excerpt reads;

The relationship between Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Romney — nurtured over meals in Boston, New York and Jerusalem, strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies — has resulted in an unusually frank exchange of advice and insights on topics like politics, economics and the Middle East.

When Mr. Romney was the governor of Massachusetts, Mr. Netanyahu offered him firsthand pointers on how to shrink the size of government.

When Mr. Netanyahu wanted to encourage pension funds to divest from businesses tied to Iran, Mr. Romney counseled him on which American officials to meet with. And when Mr. Romney first ran for president, Mr. Netanyahu presciently asked him whether he thought Newt Gingrich would ever jump into the race.

The article also details how Israel would nearly have decision making capabilities if Romney was elected reading;

Mr. Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.

This is a clear indicator that Netanyahu might use Romney as a puppet if he is elected president although Obama looks as if he is set to become president via overfunding by the globalists.

 

Mitt and Bibi Joined at the Hip

By Philip Giraldi
The Passionate Attachment
April 12, 2012

One of the more outrageous articles to appear recently describes how likely Republican Party presidential nominee Mitt Romney and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enjoy a close personal relationship based on their simultaneous employment at the Boston Consulting Group in 1976. The article also explains how that relationship has continued, with Netanyahu briefing Romney on the subject of Iran before the March Super Tuesday primaries. Earlier, in December, Romney criticized Newt Gingrich over a comment about Palestinians, asserting that “Before I made a statement of that nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say ‘Would it help if I say this? What would you like me to do?’”

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Romney is handing the exercise of US foreign policy on the Middle East over to Israel. And it also doesn’t take any particular insight to realize that if a foreign head of state is advising a presidential candidate on foreign policy in any context it is completely unacceptable interference in the domestic politics of the United States. So why isn’t the media screaming in outrage? Well, the usual reason: that Israel is untouchable.

As loathsome as Obama has been in his craven surrender to Israeli interests, there has always been to the saving grace that one knows deep down that the president despises Netanyahu even as he fears him and the power of the Israel Lobby. Not so with Mitt, who will be an enthusiastic puppet in whatever game the Israelis decide to play.

Philip Giraldi is the executive director of the Council for the National Interest and a recognized authority on international security and counterterrorism issues.

 

 

Organized Jewry, The Inciter of Global War and Genocide


War is a Jewish racket

by ZionCrimeFactory

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, we have been fed a crock of Jewish/Zionist dung-heap about the Second World War. Our governments, beholden to Jewish money and political influence, have been peddling fantasy stories as “truth”, fairy tales as “fact”, and preposterous fables as “history”, for seventy years straight. Our criminal governments have been lying to us and manipulating us into fighting senseless, catastrophic wars with the sole purpose of vanquishing the enemies of International Jewry, and thus paving the path for the Jewish takeover of the entire planet.

WWII — A Bloodbath For Jewish Benefit

It is a very difficult thing for Americans, Canadians, Brits, Australians, Frenchmen, and other Westerners, to come to terms with the fact that i) WWII was a senseless bloodbath that served no purpose other than to benefit the Jewish Power Elite in various ways, ii) that we were fighting on the wrong side, and iii) Hitler was right about everything. Call it pride, cognitive dissonance, or some combination of both — nobody likes to admit they were hoodwinked.

Jews fired the first shot in 1933.

Despite popular belief, WWII did not start in September of 1939 with the British and French declaration of war against Germany; it actually started in 1933. In 1933, organized Jewry initiated a subversive economic war against Germany; a boycott of German goods designed to weaken and destroy Hitler’s National Socialist government.  The March 24, 1933, edition of England’s Daily Express newspaper ran the headline “Judea Declares War on Germany“. The article reported: “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.”

International Jewry formally declared its “holy war” against Germany long before Hitler began restricting the rights of Germany’s Jews. Jewry’s war declaration against Germany was issued by Samuel Untermeyer of the World Jewish Federation who said, in the New York Times of 7 Aug. 1933, that it would be means of an “economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.” The Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940, quoted Rabbi Maurice L. Perlzweig of the World Jewish Congress telling a Canadian audience that “the World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years.” The Jewish desire for war was admitted to by Rabbi Felix Mendelsohn in the Chicago “Sentinel” of 8 Oct. 1942 where he states: “The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” 

Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934 (also quoted in “Histoire de l’Armée Allemande” by Jacques Benoist-Mechin, Vol. IV, p. 303) said: “For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” In Les Nouvelles Litterairres, February 10, 1940, Schalom Asch is quoted as saying: “Even if we Jews are not physically at your side in the trenches, we are morally with you. This war is our war and you fight it with us.”

Chaim Weizmann, the late chairman of the World Zionist Organization and first president of Israel, made clear the genocidal Jewish intention to destroy Germany. In a letter to British PM Winston Churchill dated September 10, 1941, Weizmann spoke about how the Jews of the United States pulled the nation into the first World War, and he promised they could do it again, given that Britain fulfilled Zionist demands regarding Palestine. Weizmann wrote: “It has been routinely acknowledged by British statesman that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it — and may do it — again.” In a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York, Weizmann stated: “We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.”

The 24 July, 1942, edition of the American Hebrew Magazine made it plainly clear who brought America into the war when it declared that “whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur’s men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: the real reason that boy went to his death was because Hitler’s anti-semitic movement succeeded in Germany.”

Further proof Jews were behind the push for war on both sides of the Atlantic came in the form of a diary entry made by James Forrestal, who later became U.S. Secretary of Defense in the Truman administration. In his diary of 27 Dec. 1945 Forrestal notes that he played golf with Joseph Kennedy (father of JFK), FDR’s ambassador to Britain, who told him that ex-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain “stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into war.” In 1949, Forrestal was fired by President Truman and within two months was murdered (ruled a “suicide”) for his opposition to Zionism and the nascent state of Israel.

Likewise, Roosevelt was guided into the war by Jews. On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role in shaping American foreign policy. His secret reports said such things as:

“The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful …

… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe.

…the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.

In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations.

The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda which is under Jewish influence…

…Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press.”

Roosevelt was surrounded by Jew advisers — rabid anti-German hatemongers and warmongers of the worst sort — such as Bernard Baruch, S. I. Rosenman, Sidney Weinburg, Sidney Hillman, Henry Morgenthau Jr., and Felix Frankfurter.

As Dr. Stephen Sniegoski points out in his book review of The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State:

“Jews also played a significant role in getting the United States into World War II to destroy their Nazi nemesis. And they worked actively to undermine popular noninterventionist resistance to war. For example, the Anti-Defamation League “employed investigative agents who secretly penetrated isolationist and anti-Semitic organizations and collected potentially damaging or incriminating information” which it turned over to the FBI and other federal agencies. (p. 110) Ginsberg does not develop this point, but given the fact that the overwhelming majority of “isolationists” were not enemy agents and were simply exercising their constitutional right to oppose a policy, it is apparent that activist American Jews have been quite willing to crush the civil liberties of others in order to advance their own goals. Jews also played a critical part in turning the media toward a prowar stance. (That was quite an achievement, since the American mood in the 1930s was strongly antiwar and “isolationist.”) In Hollywood, Jewish film makers concentrated on producing anti-Nazi propaganda films to prepare the masses for a crusade against evil.”

So, as has been clearly demonstrated, WWII was provoked by Jews and the blame for this catastrophic bloodbath of sixty million human beings lays squarely at the feet of International Jewry. Hitler did not start the war nor did he want war. To the contrary, Hitler made it clear that he was opposed to such a war, having witnessed first hand the hell of the first catastrophic world war. In 1945 Hitler stated: “It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.”

In fact, Jew lackey British PM Winston Churchill — who was a self-professed Zionist, a warmonger, a terrorist, and mass murderer –  flatly rejected peace offers from Hitler in 1939, 1940 and 1941. When Hitler’s number two man, Rudolf Hess, made his miraculous flight to Britain (having to crash land in Scotland) in 1941 to make peace and end the war, Churchill had him arrested and imprisoned for life. Undeniably it was the Jews, and their puppet politicians in America, France and Britain, who wanted war, and did everything they could to instigate and then prolong it.

(…)This is a classic case of Jewish psychological projection, considering that it has always been the chief objective of the Jewish religion to rule the earth and acquire all earthly treasures and possessions; thereby making all Gentiles into subservient slaves to the Jews. It is the Jews, not the Germans, who desire world domination, as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have made perfectly clear. Not only is Jewish world dominion elucidated in the Protocols (which have undoubtedly proven to be authentic, despite endless Jewish kvetching to the contrary) but in all ancient Judaic religious texts — the Torah, Talmud, books of the Zohar and Kaballah. Prominent Jewish rabbis from Israel are quite open about their sinister desire to murder and enslave non-Jews.

The Zionist Hand Behind Middle-East Wars

Zionist butcher, Ariel Sharon, puppeteered America’s military forces like a marrionette to crush his enemies.

The genocidal destruction that has rained down on the middle-east for the past decade was launched at the behest of a small cadre of conniving Jewish-Zionist ideologues who call themselves “neoconservatives.” The brainchild of three Jewish Communists (“Trotskyites”) Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz and Leo Strauss, neoconservatism is — and has always been — a Jewish movement, led by Zionist motivations and for Zionist gain.

An article written by Gal Beckerman in the Jewish daily news magazine, The Forward, opined: “Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War (with extra points if it’s Pat Buchanan doing the acknowledging). But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. It’s a thought one imagines most American Jews, overwhelmingly liberal, will find horrifying. And yet it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants’ grandchildren.

Jewish political scientist, Benjamin Ginsberg, acknowledged that neoconservatism was essentially a product of Jewish tribalism: “One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right’s hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel’s security.”

Irving Kristol, the Jewish “godfather” of the neoconservative movement let slip the Israeli-centric agenda of his nefarious ideology when, in 1973, he stated: “Senator McGovern is very sincere when he says that he will try to cut the military budget by 30%. And this is to drive a knife in the heart of Israel… Jews don’t like big military budgets. But it is now in the interests of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States… American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.”

Fellow neoconservative godfather Norman Podhoretz has made similar statements about using American military prowess to protect Israel. Leo Strauss, also a Jewish Zionist and early neocon “intellectual,” advocated the perpetual deception of the public by those in power for a “greater good.” This “greater good” that he spoke of was what was good for the Jews, not the Gentiles among whom they live. Noam Chomsky has argued that Strauss’s theory is a form of Leninism, in which society should be led by a group of elite vanguards, whose job is to protect liberal society against the dangers of excessive individualism, and creating inspiring myths to make the masses believe that they are fighting against anti-democratic and anti-liberal forces. Journalists, such as Seymour Hersh, have opined that Strauss endorsed noble lies, “myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive society.”

Jewish neocon genocidists like to speak in public about “global crusades for democracy,” but this is just a clever ruse to deceive the “Goyim” about their real agenda which is to bolster the hegemonic status of Israel in the middle-east ensemble. The Jew William Kristol (son of Irving Kristol), editor of the Weekly Standard, explained the real reason for the disingenuous rhetoric about global democracy to the Jerusalem Post (27th July 2000): “I’ve always thought it was best for Israel for the US to be generally engaged and generally strong, and then the commitment to Israel follows from a general foreign policy.”

Neocon godfather Leo Strauss trained his Jewish-Zionist « pupils » in the art of subversion and the perpetual deception of American « Goyim ».

Two of Leo Stauss’s more notable protégé’s were none other than Jewish Iraq war architect, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Shulsky. Shulsky was the Jewish Straussian who was appointed head of the Office of Special Plans by fellow Jewish neocon Douglas Feith (then Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in the Pentagon). This office supplied the major portion of the fraudulent “intelligence” that was used by the Bush administration to justify the war against Iraq. It has been proven that the Zionist propaganda entity embedded within the Pentagon, the Office of Special Plans, worked closely with Israel to cook up the “Iraq WMD threat to America” hoax.

The phony “threat” of Iraq possessing or attempting to possess and wield “weapons of mass destruction” was cunningly contrived by Israel and its vast network of Jewish “sayanim” operatives in America who formed a tight conglomeration of neoconservative “think tanks”, such as the Project for a New American Century, American Enterprise Institute, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, among many others, who were behind all of the propaganda, conjecture and lies that led to the disastrous Zionist proxy war to behead the Iraqi nation for Israel’s benefit in 2003.

Israel’s sayanim operatives had also burrowed their way into the top echelons of the Bush Administration and the Pentagon — namely Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Eliot Abrams, Abram Shulsky, Lewis Libby, Ari Fleischer, David Frum, Eliot Cohen, Joshua Bolten, Marc Grossman and many others — thus enabling these inhuman Zionist war-hawks to set US foreign policy at the drop of a dime. In fact, the Bush Administration was infested with dual Israeli-American citizens; forty-two of them to be exact. Many of these Jews had extensive links to the Jewish-Israeli lobby (AIPAC, AJC, ADL, ZOA, etc) and to the Sharon regime in Israel.

It’s not exactly a secret that the neocons are mostly Jews whose loyalty lies with the Zionist state, not America. Ari Shavit, a writer for Israel’s Haaretz Daily News Service, proudly proclaimed that:

“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.”

It’s incredible to see some people still trying to deny this.

This lunatic Zionist agenda for mid-east destruction goes back much further than many people realize. In 1996, a militarist Israeli “thank tank” called the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), authored a policy paper for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister, the crazed Arab-hating war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm“. Within this damnable Zionist strategy paper we find the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi Ba’athist regime being advocated as an “important Israeli strategic objective”, as well as calls for the toppling of the governments of Iran and Syria. Their grand strategy was aimed at replacing the governments of these countries with Israel-friendly stooges. Three of the authors of this warmongering paper were none other than Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser — all of whom became top ranking members of the Bush Administration in 2001 eagerly pushing for an American war with Iraq. The Clean Break paper was essentially a continuation of an earlier proposal by Zionist extremist Oded Yinon called “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s” (published in 1982). Yinon wickedly suggested that the Arab States should be destroyed from within by exploiting their internal religious and ethnic tensions. These cold-blooded Israeli Geo-political strategists envisioned that by weakening Israel’s external enemies they could thereby weaken Israel’s internal enemies, i.e. the native Palestinians.

Some of the subversive Jews behind the Iraq War.

The ultra-militaristic Project for a New American Century group — which many people suggest was the prime mover in shaping the post-9/11 American-led war agenda in the middle-east — was essentially an offshoot of the Israeli IASPS, and was headed by Jewish neocon heavyweights William Kristol and Robert Kagan. In one of the group’s deranged “studies” in September of 2000, PNAC released a report entitled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century”, which called for a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to galvanize the American masses behind illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and a broader war against the entire Arab/Muslim world. It chillingly stated, “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic catalyzing event — like a New Pearl Harbor.” At least half the members of the PNAC group were Jewish. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and the American Enterprise Institute were also instrumental in the deceptive propaganda campaign that led to the war in Iraq. Both groups were Jewish-financed and run operations.

Another important piece to this Zionist puzzle is the Jonathan Institute, a maniacal Zionist “think tank” set up in 1979 by former and current Israeli prime minister’s Menachem Begin (terrorist/mass murderer, former head of the Irgun) and Benjamin Netanyahu. This group of Israeli terror planners held a series of conferences throughout the 1980s and derived its name from Bibi Netanyahu’s late brother Jonathan Netanyahu, who was killed in the Israeli raid on Entebbe airport in Uganda in the 1970s. This coterie of Zionist crooks endeavored to promote their genocidal fantasies of a “clash of civilizations” between the West and Israel’s Arab/Islamic adversaries and also effectively publicized their desire for Western powers to adopt their espoused doctrine of “preemptive retaliation,” the Israeli policy of killing those designated as “terrorists” before they can act. Begin, Netanyahu and other international Jewish terror masters, attempted to seduce Western leaders to join their sadistic effort to fragment and destabilize the middle-east so as to make it safer for Israel and ripe for Israeli plundering.

Zionist parasite Netanyahu, the architect of 9/11 and the global « war on terror » crusade of Zionist mayhem and chaos.

Netanyahu published a book in 1986 entitled, Terrorism: How the West Can Win, which was a collection of essays from himself and like-minded Zionist gangsters who harbored grandiose dreams of the annihilation of Arabs and Muslims who get in the way of the Likud Party’s strategic objectives. Netanyahu’s book basically lays out the frame-work for what is now generally known as the “war on terror”, and contains all of the vocabulary and discourse that didn’t enter our lexicon until after the suspicious events of 9/11. This book is undoubtedly a key piece of evidence that the “war on terror” is a Zionist-engineered scam for global Jewish hegemony.

The Jewish Neocons — who had been lurking over capital hill like hawks for decades, running their sleazy Zionist propaganda outfit magazines and periodicals such as The Weekly Standard and The New Republic — had for years been unsuccessful in their ceaseless pursuit to drag America into another war in the middle-east, following the first Persian-Gulf war in 1991. Nobody was buying their lies that Iraq posed an imminent danger to America. But that all changed on September 11, 2001.

The catalyst for this current state of perpetual warfare between the West and Israel’s Islamic enemies was, of course, 9/11; the “new pearl harbor” event that the PNAC Zionists had been lusting for to realize their wet-dreams of endless warfare.

Pitting the West against the Islamic Middle-East in a prolonged battle was something that Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak and the then Israeli PM Ariel Sharon publicly called for within an hour of the terrorist spectacle that struck America on that fateful day; a testament to the true authors of the day’s horrific events. An event that Benjamin Netanyahu mockingly proclaimed was a “good thing for Israel … will bring immediate sympathy [for Israel's cause].” An event that genocidaire, Ariel Sharon, dubbed Israel’s “Hanukkah miracle.” An event which Israeli political analyst Ehud Sprinzak candidly described as “the most important public relations act ever committed” in favor of the Jews and Israel.

Of course, for those of us who have actually studied the subject of 9/11, we know who the real perpetrators were. The former head of Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service (Hamid Gul), the 25 year German SPD parliamentarian and author of several books on the secret operations of intelligence agencies (Andreas Von Bulow), the former President of Italy (Francesco Cossiga), as well as the former director of studies of the US Army War College (Dr. Alan Sabrosky), all unanimously concur that the Israeli Mossad conducted 9/11 as a false-flag attack to kick-start this long-planned “clash of civilizations” that Zionists had been so zealously lobbying for, for decades.

(For more information about the Jewish origins and Zionist machinations of the neoconservative movement that engineered the Iraq War, see Michael Collins Piper’s book, The High Priests of War, and Dr. Stephen Sniegoski’s book, The Transparent Cabal. Also recommended are the two excellent documentaries, “War By Deception” and “Missing Links“, which comprehensively expose the Zionist cabal behind 9/11 and the 9/11 wars.)

Jewish Neocons and the HoloHoax

Talmudic crybaby whiners use the HoloHoax guilt-trip routine as a smokescreen for criminal activity.

There is an interesting connection between Jewish neoconservatism and the fictitious ‘Holocaust’ religion. The Jewish Mafia’s preposterous anti-German conspiracy theory — known to the world as The Holocaust™ — is central to neoconservative thinking.

Jewish journalist Gal Beckerman had this to say about the motivations of Jewish neoconservatives:

“It was Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous vic-tory.” By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good for the Jews?”

Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations” on anitisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.”

As that article demonstrates, one of the main motivating factors behind the policies advocated by neoconservative ideologues was protecting the Jews from “another holocaust.” Of course, what this article won’t tell you is that the alleged ‘holocaust’ of Jews during WWII did not, and could not have scientifically, mathematically, possibly ever occurred. Nor did any of the dozens of other “holocausts” or “imminent holocausts” of “six million Jews” that Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Communist propagandists had been incessantly promoting in the press dating back to the late 19th century.

Interestingly, the main Zionist architect of the savage Iraq War, Paul Wolfowitz, was heavily influenced by the fraudulent mythology of Holocaustianity. According to Shelemyahu Zacks, Paul Wolfowitz’ father, Jacob Wolfowitz, “fought … for the liberation of Soviet Jewry. He was a friend and strong supporter of the state of Israel, AIPAC member and had many friends and admirers there.” Paul Wolfowitz’s wikipedia article asserts that he was, “Strongly influenced by his father, Paul Wolfowitz became “a soft-spoken former aspiring-mathematician-turned-policymaker … [whose] world views … were forged by family history and in the halls of academia rather than in the jungles of Vietnam or the corridors of Congress … [His father] … escaped Poland after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust.” Wolfowitz may have lost some family in WWII, as did tens of millions of other people, but his relatives certainly didn’t die in a “homicidal gas chamber” because such claims are a tissue of fabrication.

Wikipedia tells us that Wolfowitz read about the HoloHoax and Hiroshima as a boy and calls them “the polar horrors”. Speaking of the influence of the HoloHoax on his views, Wolfowitz said: “That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views … It’s a very bad thing when people exterminate other people [except, of course, when Jews exterminate Palestinians or when Allied troops exterminated Germans or when Jewish Communists exterminated Russians and Ukrainians or when American troops exterminate Arabs and Muslims on behalf of Israel -- ZCF], and people persecute minorities. It doesn’t mean you can prevent every such incident in the world, but it’s also a mistake to dismiss that sort of concern as merely humanitarian and not related to real interest.”

Another key architect of the Iraq War, sleazeball Zionist genocidist Richard Perle, is seen in this BBC documentary titled “The War Party”, saying how the HoloHoax has shaped his worldview and is essentially the motivating factor that drives his insidious warmongering on behalf of Israel. At the 16:49 mark of the video, Perle says: “the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.”

It is supremely axiomatic that the “big lie” of “Iraqi WMD” that was used to justify the war against Iraq was conjured up by, in essence, the same caliber of cunning Jew propagandists that conned the world into believing in the “big lie” of “German WMD” (the gas-chambers myth). The shared mindset of people like Perle, Wolfowitz, and other Jewish neocons, is that the HoloHoax justifies Israel’s existence, it justifies US support for Israel, and it justifies endless wars against Arab/Muslim nations for Israel’s “security.”

Little children are mesmerized by HoloHoax propaganda films from the outset of their childhood. No wonder they believe this crap.

The Zionist-trumpeted myth of ‘Iraqi WMD’ has been dismantled and is believed by very few people today (with the possible exception of Sean Hannity). However, the myth of ‘German WMD’ (gas-chambers lie) is still very much believed by the majority of the mind-controlled Western populace, because that propaganda has been so relentless and intensively force-fed to people since a young age. Not only that, but it is actually illegal to challenge the claims of the HoloHoax in a dozen countries in Europe — no wonder so many people believe it, in many countries they are forced to by law! Europeans who bravely refuse to blindly accept and adhere to the conformist dogma of this hoax run the risk of heavy fines and even imprisonment! Truth doesn’t need laws to protect it from scrutiny, but lies do.

Once the holocaust myth is finally dismembered on a wide scale, then all of the fraudulent justifications Jewish Neocons give to generate support for Israel and global Jewry in all of their villainous endeavors, will collapse like a house of cards.

The First Gulf War, Atrocity Propaganda and the HoloHoax

Zionists Steven Solarz and Tom Lantos masterminded the push for American intervention in the first Persian-Gulf war using lies and deceit.

There is also an interesting correlation between the first Gulf War, atrocity propaganda and the HoloHoax.

The late American-Jewish congressman Tom Lantos, a Hungarian “HoloHoax survivor” and rabid Zionist, was the mastermind behind another series of atrocity lies which led the US down the path of endless wars in the middle-east on behalf of Israel. Tom Lantos’ Congressional Human Rights Caucus held a hearing after the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in 1991. Lantos’ Human Rights Caucus presented “(lie)witnesses” who spoke about alleged atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait. It was revealed months after this hearing successfully pushed America into the first Gulf War, that the whole thing was a scripted hoax! The entire saga was concocted with the help of the public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton.

The testimony that clinched the war resolution that barely passed in the Senate in a 52-47 vote, was delivered by a young Kuwaiti girl who appeared anonymous at the hearing, known to the public only as “Nayirah”. She claimed to have witnessed Iraqi troops come into a Kuwaiti hospital with guns, who then proceeded to remove dozens of babies from their incubators — stole the incubators — and left the babies to die on the cold floor. This never happened. “Nayirah” spoke perfect American English (likely lived in the US her whole life) and turned out to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. This disgraceful and corrupt young woman was nothing less than a paid actor, coached in the art of deception, who tearfully recited a rehearsed pro-war propaganda script prepared for her by her Zionist paymasters. This hoax atrocity story was widely publicized by mainstream media outlets and Kuwaiti officials repeated these lies at the United Nations in their campaign to elicit Western intervention in their struggle with Saddam Hussein.

The “Kuwaiti incubators hoax” essentially provided the casus belli for American intervention in the first Gulf War. Evidently, child atrocity stories are an effective pro-war propaganda tool because of their ability to garner anger from the public, which is why Jews are so fond of telling grotesque tall tales of Nazis ripping babies in half with their bare hands. Is it any surprise that Lantos (being the experienced liar that he is) was one of the highlighted stars of Steven Spielberg’s Holocaust Hoax documentary, “The Last Days”? A counter-documentary which exposes the lies of Spielberg’s hate film was released earlier this year titled “The Last Days of the Big Lie“; I encourage everyone to watch it.

Zionists attempted second twentieth century « gas chambers » hoax in 1991; this time maligning Iraqis with this ridiculous ‘blood libel’. Click to enlarge.

It is hardly surprising that during the first Zionist-contrived Gulf War deceitful Jews laughably attempted to resurrect the WWII “homicidal gas chambers” myth and project it onto Iraq. The New York based Jewish Press, then calling itself “the largest independent Anglo-Jewish weekly newspaper,” wrote on its title page on February 21, 1991: “IRAQIS HAVE GAS CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS” The front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles and distributed in 381,065 copies, was: “GERMANS PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”

Nobody took those claims seriously, and they obviously weren’t true. But it illustrates the reckless disregard Jews have for historical truth and accuracy. Time and time again we see mendacious Jews carelessly trying to elicit sympathy from the public using lies, even resorting to resurrecting past false propaganda narratives to malign their new enemies (the Arabs and Muslims) with. It’s been over 60 years since WWII, you’d think these scoundrels would have come up with some new lies and slanders by now. It seems that any time the Jews want to demonize someone they march up to the old “attic of Jewry” where they keep all the atrocity propaganda albums and highlight reels, lift off the shelf the first ancient Aggadah fable they can find, dust it off, and use it once again. If it doesn’t work the first time, they try again and again until it finally sticks. I guess the Jews aren’t as sophisticated as some might think.

Conclusion

Countless times, non-Jews — mesmerized by subversive propaganda — have been duped into going to war against the Jews’ enemies. Unmistakeably, the main tool of the Jew to accomplish his sinister ends is the power of propaganda and mass persuasion through atrocity lies. The television and news-media is their greatest weapon because with those elements under their firm control they are able to shape what the public thinks and feels; thereby shaping what people do. Multitudinous millions of Gentiles have fought, killed and died in wars instigated by International Jewry, aided and abetted by Gentile pawns and stooges who sell out their own people for short-term monetary gain and political power.

Ostensibly, the Jews have attained their current position as global hegemon and world dictator through the instigation of wars and revolutions — pitting Gentiles against Gentiles. As we are busy killing each other, the Jews merrily count their shekels all the way to the bank. In the end, it is people’s innate naivety, as well as their susceptibility to be deceived and misled by emotive atrocity stories, that affords the Jews a smooth ride to world supremacy. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late. Either accept the truth now, and inform others about it, or face slavery!

Share

 

 

Sur ce blog:

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

AL QAÏDA ET ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

John McCain, Joe Lieberman et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur… 

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

McCain et Lieberman: « bombardez la Libye! »

Le croisé anti-terrorisme Lieberman lié à un groupe pro-terrorisme

‘A CLEAN BREAK’, le modèle du PNAC: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Une comique juive au parlement israélien: je ne voulais pas heurter la mémoire de la Shoah en dénonçant le cancer de l’immigration africaine en Israël

Raisonnement typique.

Israeli MK: I didn’t mean to shame Holocaust by calling African migrants a ‘cancer’

Miri Regev - Tomer Appelbaum - May 21, 2012

ed note–typical Jewish mindset. She is not worried about how her remarks are considered abusive and racist against those against whom they were directed. Rather, she is worried that her comments will somehow do shame to the memory of Jewish suffering, real or imagined.
And these people continue to wonder why they are/have been hated throughout history.
Likud MK Miri Regev, who came under fire last week after calling African migrants “a cancer” in Israeli society, apologized for the first time for her comments on Sunday, opting, however, to leave the migrants out of her apology.

Regev’s controversial comments came during a violent rally staged by residents of Tel Aviv’s south – where many African migrants live – to protest rising crime rates in the area. In the rally, the Likud MK said “the Sudanese are a cancer in our body.”

She was later criticized for inflaming the protesters, with angry demonstrators later going on to attack African passers-by and journalists, breaking into and looting shops associated with the African migrant community and shattering car windshields.

At the time, Regev condemned “any violence from any side, but I understand the rage and hurt of the residents, of the families that live there. They tell us: ‘Help us. We are being humiliated, look how we live, we are afraid to leave the house.’”

However, speaking to Israeli media outlets over the weekend and on Sunday, Regev chose to apologize for calling the Sudanese a cancer, opting however, to direct her apology to Holocaust survivors and cancer patients.

“When I compared the migrant worker phenomenon to cancer I was referring to the way the phenomenon had spread, and not anything else. If anyone took it otherwise and was consequently offended, I apologize and I surely did not intend to hurt either Holocaust survivors or cancer patients,” she said.

Regev told Maariv that she was very “attuned to the issue of the Holocaust. The memory of the Holocaust is seared deeply into my heart back from my time in high school when I prepared a paper on the subject.”

“Up until a year ago I did not set foot in Germany, and made it a point not to purchase German-made products,” the Likud MK and former army spokesperson said, adding: “When I was with an IDF delegation in Auschwitz I didn’t stop crying, and so if someone attributed a wrong interpretation of my comments or was offended by them, I apologize.”

Regev added that “she didn’t talk about people as being cancer but of an infiltration phenomenon that was spreading.”

The Likud MK also added that she was sensitive to the feelings of cancer patients, adding that she was herself involved with the care given to a boy with cancer, telling the website of Israeli daily Maariv that she understands the emotions involved with ta mention of the disease.

“When [former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin] said the settlers were a cancer, no one made any fuss. When [Peace Now head] Yariv Oppenheimer speaks of the settlements as caner, everyone is silent. When I talk about the phenomenon, I get attacked just became I’m a leader from the right-wing,” Regev added.

Last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised that his government would address the issue of African migrants in Israel, one day after a protest against them by residents of south Tel Aviv turned violent.

“The infiltrator problem must be solved, and we will solve it,” Netanyahu said on Thursday afternoon, speaking at an event in Tel Aviv.

He also refered to the construction of a fence on the Egypt-Israel border, saying, “We will complete construction of the fence within two months, and soon we will begin sending infiltrators back to their countries of origin.”

The prime minister also condemned the actions of demonstrators and Knesset members on Wednesday, when demonstrators attacked African migrants in South Tel Aviv.

“I want to make it clear that there is no place for the statements and actions that we witnessed yesterday. I say these things to the public figures and to the residents of south Tel Aviv, whose pain I understand,” he said.

 

 

VIDEO – Aucune preuve de chambre à gaz à Nuremberg
VIDEO – La malhonnêteté des historiens officiels, pt1, pt2

 

Sur ce blog:

Pourquoi Zundel aime tant les États-Unis: un constitutionnaliste conservateur rejette la version officielle de la Seconde Guerre mondiale

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d’un journal juif américain, soutient qu’il ne prônait pas vraiment l’assassinat d’Obama

Le racisme permis : le racisme israélien

 

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Rabbi Yosef: il est interdit de soigner un non-Juif le jour du Shabbat

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef

 

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0%2c7340%2cL-4229767%2c00.html

Rabbi Yosef: Treating gentiles violates Sabbath

Shas’ leader says religious physicians cannot violate Sabbath in order to save gentiles’ lives, but offers halachic solution to avoid legal repercussions

Ynet

05.17.12, 13:36 / Israel Jewish SceneWhat should religious doctors do if a gentile is injured in a car accident on Shabbat and is rushed to the hospital? According to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, this does not warrant violating the sanctity of the Sabbath.

During a class on Sabbath halacha relating to religious physicians, the spiritual leader of Shas said that while doctors are expected to do everything in their power – even if it requires violating the Sabbath – in order to save Jews whose lives are in danger, the same does not apply for gentiles.

« If a gentile were to get injured in a car accident during Sabbath, and he is brought to the hospital – Israel must not treat him, » he said, explaining that « if the particular procedures come from rabbis (de-rabbanan), then they might be permitted, but if they stem from prohibitions in the Torah (de-’oraita), then they are not allowed, as the Torah forbids to violate the Sabbath for gentiles. »

Rabbi Yosef expounded on the problem, saying that the Mishnah Berurah explicitly says that « all religious physicians who treat gentiles on the Sabbath or violating the Sabbath; however, in reality the patients are brought to the hospital and must be treated. The doctors’ license says they must treat all patients without distinction of faith or race, and if they don’t, the State could revoke their license and also punish them. So what should the poor doctors do? »

The rabbi offered a halachic solution that follows a rule by which if a single person is doing the act, he is violating the Sabbath, while if two people are doing it together, they are exempt.

« The doctor who needs to operate will call on another doctor, or nurse, to hold the scalpel together and make the incision, » said Rabbi Yosef, saying that « it is necessary in order for religious physicians to refrain from being put on trial for distinguishing between a Jew and a gentile on Sabbath. »

 

judeologie.com :

Racisme juif: «ne violez pas les règles du Shabbat pour sauver la vie d’un goy»

Article d’Asher Zeiger, dans The Time of Israel, le 17 Mai 2012

Le rabbin Ovadia Yosef avec le président de l’entité sioniste Shimon Peres

Donnant récemment une leçon sur les lois du Shabbat, le rabbin Ovadia Yossef, chef spirituel du parti Shas et ancien grand rabbin séfarade  a déclaré que les lois concernant la violation du Shabbat sont différentes selon que l’on a affaire à un «gentil»( ndlr: goy, non-juif, bref un sous-homme) ou a juif quand il s’agit de sauver une vie.
Yosef, qui a 91 ans, a dit dans la leçon qui a été enregistrée par ses adhérents, que parce que la Torah nous enseigne que ses lois sont pour nous pour «vivre par elles et non pour mourir par elles», le sauvetage d’une vie l’emporte sur toutes les lois de la Torah, mais seulement quand la vie est celle d’un Juif. Il a dit que la Torah ne permet pas la profanation du Shabbat pour sauver la vie d’un gentil.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/ovadia-yosef-speaks-against-sabbath-desecration-to-save-non-jewish-lives/

(lire le reste…)

 

 
La justice israélienne renonce à poursuivre les auteurs d’un ouvrage jugé raciste

 

Sur ce blog:

Le racisme permis: le racisme israélien

Selon le Grand rabbin orthodoxe sépharade Ovadia Yosef, « les Gentils n’existent que pour servir les Juifs »

 

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

DÉMÉNAGEMENT DE CE BLOG Dû AUX NOUVELLES LOIS CONTRE LA HAINE SUR INTERNET

 

 

La loi omnibus sur le crime C-10 (reprenant le contenu des lois c-50, c-51 et c-52) a été adoptée sous bâillon ce soir par le parlement canadien à majorité conservatrice du gouvernement philosémite de Stephen Harper.

 

L’évolution du projet de loi C-10:

Harper assimile l’attentat de Mumbai à un acte antisémite (13 mars 2009)

Discours du Premier ministre Harper rendant hommage aux victimes des attaques terroristes de Mumbai devant les Chabad Loubavitch  (12 mars 2009)

Harper reaffirms Tory support for state of Israel–Prime Minister Stephen Harper holds a prayer book given to him by Rabbi Mendel Kaplan, left, during the grand opening of the Ernest Manson Lubavitch Centre in Thornhill, Ontario on Thursday, The speech comes amid the government’s refusal to allow British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, apparently because of links to Hamas. (March 26, 2009)

PMO hires 2 former White House staff to boost Canada’s profile in U.S. Mike McCurry — who served as press secretary to former U.S. president Bill Clinton — and Ari Fleischer [NEOCON JEW], who held the same role under former president George W. Bush, have been hired to boost Canada’s profile in the U.S., said Kory Teneycke, the communications director for the PMO. (April 16, 2009)

Justice : Harper veut permettre aux victimes de poursuivre les terroristes L’avocat de Toronto Aaron Blumenfeld, qui oeuvre au sein de la Canadian Coalition Against Terror, a affirmé que les familles des victimes canadiennes d’attaques terroristes réclament depuis longtemps une telle loi. (31 mai 2009)

Canadian Jewish Congress to give Prime Minister Stephen Harper a human-rights award (31 mai 2009)

Prime Minister Harper Receives Saul Hayes Human Rights Award / Le Premier ministre Harper reçoit le prix Saul-Hayes des droits de la personne (31 mai 2009)

Canada to allow terror trials PM Harper says proposed bill to permit lawsuits against terror groups, acts of anti-Semitism (June 1, 2009)

Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust education Creation of task force marks 70th anniversary of Canada’s rejection of Jewish refugees (June 1, 2009)

PM pledges law to let terror victims sue Victims of terrorism could soon have the right to sue anyone who commits a terrorist act or anyone who funds terrorism, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told members of the Canadian Jewish Congress Sunday. (June 2, 2009)

B’nai Brith Canada applauds Government anti-terrorism initiative (June 2, 2009)

Le ministre de la Sécurité publique annonce le dépôt d’un nouveau projet de loi visant à permettre aux victimes d’actes terroristes d’intenter des poursuites contre les auteurs de ces actes……et ceux qui les soutiennent « Le sénateur David Tkachuk (AGENT SIONISTE) est un grand défenseur des victimes d’actes terroristes. En déposant ce projet de loi aujourd’hui, je lui rends hommage pour les efforts qu’il a déployé à cet égard », a ajouté le ministre Van Loan.(2 juin 2009)

Une loi pour poursuivre les terroristes Dimanche, à Toronto, à l’occasion d’une rencontre du Congrès juif canadien, le premier ministre Harper a affirmé que cette loi enverrait un message clair aux terroristes et à leurs commanditaires: le Canada les tient juridiquement responsables de leurs actes. (2 juin 2009)

Terrorisme: milliards fictifs pour les victimes Ottawa a copié une loi américaine inéquitable et difficilement applicable (3 juin 2009)

2012: Loi omnibus sur le crime C-10

  • la Loi sur la justice pour les victimes d’actes de terrorisme (ancien projet de loi S-7), qui vise à permettre aux victimes de terrorisme de poursuivre les auteurs d’actes terroristes et ceux qui les soutiennent, y compris les États étrangers visés, pour les pertes ou les dommages subis à la suite d’un acte de terrorisme commis n’importe où dans le monde;
Tuesday, April 10

Un-Free Speech From Canada–Criticizing Israel is Anti-Semitic

Nearly two years after the first hearings were held in Ottawa, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition fto Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) released a detailed report on July 7 that found that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Canada, especially on university campuses.
While the CPCCA’s final report does contain some cases of real anti-Semitism, the committee has provided little evidence that anti-Semitism has actually increased in Canada in recent years. Instead, it has focused a disproportionate amount of effort and resources on what it calls a so-called « new anti-Semitism »: criticism of Israel.
Indeed, the real purpose of the CPCCA coalition seems to be to stifle critiques of Israeli policy and disrupt pro-Palestinian solidarity organizing in Canada, including, most notably, Israeli Apartheid Week events. Many of the CPCCA’s findings, therefore, must be rejected as both an attack on freedom of speech and freedom of protest, and as recklessly undermining the fight against real instances of anti-Semitism.
The CPCCA and its findings
The Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) was born out of a conference held in London in February 2009 by the Inter-Parliamentary Committee for Combating Anti-Semitism. Formed in March 2009 and not directly linked to the Canadian government, or to any NGO or advocacy group, the CPCCA included 22 Canadian Parliament members from across party lines. Former Liberal MP Mario Silva chaired the Inquiry Panel and Conservative MP Scott Reid led the Steering Committee.
Between November 2009 and January 2010, the CPCCA held ten separate hearings during which time representatives of various non-governmental organizations, religious institutions, police departments and Canadian and Israeli universities presented papers meant to assess the level of anti-Semitism in Canada. While groups critical of Israel were denied the chance to address the committee, major Zionist organizations like B’nai Brith Canada, Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, and the Canadian Jewish Congress were welcomed.
« Much of today’s anti-Semitism manifests in anti-Israel agitation around boycotts, divestment and sanctions, » said Avi Benlolo, President and CEO of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, during a hearing in November 2009. « It deploys an unfair double standard against the Jewish state, singling out of Israel alone for one-sided, harsh criticism and calls for punitive actions. »
Throughout the consultation process, the CPCCA regularly focused on Canadian university campuses, which were routinely described as hotbeds of anti-Semitism, where Jewish students or students with pro-Israel leanings are often intimidated and threatened. This accusation was made repeatedly, and included in the CPCCA’s final report, despite the fact that Dr. Fred Lowy, President Emeritus of Concordia University in Montreal, stated in his address to the CPCCA that, « by and large, Canadian campuses are safe and are not hotbeds of anti-Semitism of any kind ».
In its final report, the CPCCA made about two dozen recommendations on how best to fight anti-Semitism in Canada. While the report states that « criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is wrong », it also found that « singling Israel out for selective condemnation and opprobrium … is discriminatory and hateful » and many of its recommendations deal with combating this « new anti-Semitism ».
A major recommendation issued by the CPCCA was that the Canadian government should promote the working definition of anti-Semitism used by The European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). This definition categorizes « applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation » as anti-Semitic.
In other words, the CPCCA is supporting a definition whereby individuals who focus their attention on Israeli human rights violations, yet don’t level an equal amount of condemnation on other states for their human rights violations, can be labeled as anti-Semitic. This is obviously problematic since Palestine solidarity activists - like any other people – have commitments that make it impossible to engage with every issue they are otherwise interested in. They shouldn’t be labeled as anti-Semitic due to their inability to participate in every single human rights struggle happening around the world.
Another dangerous recommendation made by the CPCCA was that Canadian university administrators should condemn « discourse, events and speakers which are untrue, harmful, or not in the interest of academic discourse, including Israeli Apartheid Week ». Even the use of the word « apartheid » in relation to Israel is anti-Semitic, the CPCCA found, since it amounts to the « denial of the Jewish people their right to self- determination … by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor ».
This clearly violates freedom of speech and an open exchange of ideas at Canadian universities, and also unfairly and inaccurate labels Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) as anti-Semitic. In reality, IAW has since 2005 brought together respected activists, academics, journalists and cultural figures from around the world, including Judith Butler, Ronnie Kasrils, Noam Chomsky and Ali Abunimah, among others, to openly discuss ideas related to Israel/Palestine.
IAW provides an educational space for understanding Israel’s apartheid policies - as evidenced, for example, through the separate legal systems used by Israelis and Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank or the discriminatory land ownership laws operating inside Israel - and supports the growing campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), which aims to non-violently pressure Israel to respect international law. It is far from the « uniformly well-organized, aggressive [campaign] designed to make the Jewish state and its supporters pariahs » the CPCCA report makes it out to be.
The CPCCA also recommended that the Canadian Committee of Foreign Affairs undertake a study on the United Nations Human Rights Council, « particularly regarding its over-emphasis of alleged human rights abuses by Israel, while ignoring flagrant human rights abuses of other member states ».
This clearly demonstrates how the committee has confounded anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel, and is prepared to levy dubious suspicions against UN bodies and tarnish Canada’s international standing in the process.
In a statement released on July 8, Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), said that the CPCCA’s recommendations, « if implemented, will inhibit public discussion of Israel’s conduct ».
« CJPME believes that conclusions and recommendations generated by a process in which the same body – the CPCCA - is prosecutor, jury, and judge, are not credible. Although a few of the witnesses recounted incidents that were indeed indicative of genuine anti-Semitism, many were complaining about merely being exposed to criticism of the Israel’s conduct, » the CJPME press release stated.
Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) Canada also criticized the committee, stating that « the CPCCA’s goal is to criminalize criticism of Israel and Zionism, not to hold impartial hearings. Therefore, we oppose the CPCCA as an ideologically biased organization with an agenda that will harm free speech and human rights activity in Canada. We oppose the CPCCA’s Orwellian distortion of anti-Semitism. It is a danger to both Canadian liberties and to the genuine and necessary fight against anti-Semitism. »
Reflection of official Canadian policy
While labeling critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic is nothing new, the level at which this accusation is now being used in Canadian discourse must be seen as a reflection of the Canadian government’s official and current policy on the Middle East.
« When Israel, the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack, is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation, I believe we are morally obligated to take a stand.  Demonization, double standards, de-legitimization, the three D’s, it is the responsibility of us all to stand up to them, » Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in 2010 at the Ottawa Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism, which was supported by the CPCCA.  Harper added:
« Harnessing disparate anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel, as the source of injustice and conflict in the world and uses, perversely, the language of human rights to do so. We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is. »
Under Harper, Canada has routinely defended Israeli intransigence and disregard for international law and the human rights of the Palestinian people under its control. In return, trade cooperation and military and security technologies ties have been strengthened between the two states.
In May of this year, it was reported that Harper was adamantly opposed to making any reference to the 1967 borders in a G8 summit statement calling for renewed Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Far-right Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman thanked Harper for his position, and stated, « Canada is a true friend of Israel ».
In 2010, Canada announced it would discontinue its financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the organization that provides support and resources to approximately 4.7m registered Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territories, and funnel the money into greater policing and security institutions run by the un-elected and corrupt Palestinian Authority leadership instead.
In January 2009, as the Israeli army continued its disproportionate attack on the besieged civilian population in Gaza that left 1,400 Palestinians dead in the span of three weeks, Canada was the only country out of 47 that voted against a motion at the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning the Israeli violence.
In addition to providing diplomatic cover for Israel, the Canadian government has attacked and cut funding to various non-governmental organizations working on issues related to Israel/Palestine, including Kairos Churches and Alternatives International.
Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney, who led the formation of the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) and is an ex-officio member, has also repeatedly alleged that the Canadian Arab Federation promotes anti-Semitism and hatred. While Kenney never backed up these claims, the Canadian Arab Federation’s contracts with the government - which helped finance language programs for Toronto-area immigrants (the majority of whom are of Chinese origin) - were not renewed in 2009.
Undermining the fight against real anti-Semitism
Anti-Semitism, like all other forms of racism, is appalling and must be strongly and unequivocally condemned.
But by defining legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and pro-Palestinian activism in Canada as anti-Semitic, the CPCCA is not only threatening free speech and freedom of protest, but it is undermining the fight against real cases of anti-Semitism and weakening the seriousness with which such cases should be dealt.
This is something that Canadians, and people everywhere, should be adamantly against.
Jillian Kestler-D’Amours is a Canadian freelance journalist based in Jerusalem. She regularly contributes to The Electronic Intifada, Inter-Press Service and Free Speech Radio News. More of her work can be found athttp://jkdamours.com/


Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

Le sanglant sacrifice rituel de Pourim 2012: la pire attaque contre Gaza depuis Plomb Durci

En 2012, Pourim débutait le 8 mars, soit un peu avant le début des attaques sur Gaza.

L’agression de l’occupant Israélien sur Gaza est la plus grave depuis la guerre en 2008

Gaza – CPI

L’écrivain et l’analyste-politique, Ibrahim el-Madhoun, a averti que l’agression de l’occupation israélienne peut continuer à s’intensifier tant qu’il y a le silence arabe et international qui a continué à encourager les crimes de l’occupation.
En outre et dans une déclaration exclusive au CPI, el-Madhoun, a affirmé que « nous devons, tout d’abord, souligner que l’agression de l’ennemi occupant ne s’est pas arrêtée un instant sur la Palestine que ce soit à la bande de Gaza ou en Cisjordanie et à Jérusalem et ce qui se passe actuellement à Gaza n’est qu’un épisode d’une série continue contre le peuple Palestinien et ce va poursuivre tant qu’il y a le silence arabe et international. »
Par ailleurs, il voyait que l’escalade de l’armée occupante israélienne poursuivie sur la bande de Gaza et ciblant le Secrétaire Général des brigades, Zuhair el-Qaissi, est la plus dangereuse depuis la guerre contre Gaza en 2009, et il porte des intentions agressives contre le secteur assiégé, afin de l’épuiser et de le maintenir dans un cercle d’attrition continue.
D’autre côté, el-Madhoun a rajouté que » ce qui est remarquable c’est que le commencement de l’agression est survenue suite à la réunion entre le premier ministre de l’occupation israélienne « Benjamin Netanyahu » et le président américain « Barack Obama » où ils ont convenu de reporter ou d’exclure l’attaque sur l’Iran et apparemment il y a une intention délibérée de l’occupation pour un coup pénible sur la bande de Gaza, afin de regagner la dissuasion perdue suite à l’accord de « Wafaa Al-Ahrar » (Fidélité des Libres), en essayant de faire échouer la résistance, connaître sa capacité réelle sur terrain et suivre tous ses mouvements.
Ensuite, il a souligné que l’ennemi occupant essaye de cibler les cadres de terrain et de se débarrasser d’eux très tôt, il souhaite également envoyer un message à la direction politique de Gaza, en disant que l’occupation israélienne n’a pas oublié la région et ne permet pas à la résistance croissante de continuer ses activités.
D’une part, il a révélé qu’il y a une peur d’un processus israélien prévu et bien préparé pour renouveler l’agression du « Plomb durci » en tant qu’une approche proactive afin de perturber les changements faits grâce aux révolutions arabes et surtout à celle en Egypte et évaluer la réaction réelle de l’opinion publique arabe suite aux révolutions et aux changements menés dans la région, ainsi que pour créer une nouvelle réalité face à des évolutions politiques apparues grâce à ces révolutions qui ont compliqué la crise devant toute tentative arabe sérieuse pour aider la direction palestinienne.
D’autre part, l’analyste a expliqué que l’agression de l’occupation israélienne a pour objectif de briser Gaza et d’exercer des représailles sur elle surtout que cette région est considérée comme le lieu qui inspire les peuples arabes ce qui est incarné dans les convois humanitaires soutenant le secteur assiégé, et levant le slogan de la rupture du siège, ainsi que dans la visite du Premier Ministre  » Ismaël Haniyah » et l’accueil chaleureux du public dans les pays arabes et islamique où ce dernier a appelé à maintenir la résistance dans la bande de Gaza.
En plus, il a averti que les terrains égyptiens et surtout le nord du « Sinaï » ne seront pas loin du danger de l’ennemi en cas de progression de cette agression, tout en sachant qu’il y a une amplification médiatique de la réalité du nord de Sinaï et beaucoup de rapports de l’ennemi occupant israélien appellent à une approche militaire dans la région après la révolution qui a fini le régime de « Moubarak ».
Enfin, il a conclu en disant que: « cette situation exige une intervention et une réaction urgentes pour freiner l’agression de l’ennemi et également une attitude sérieuse et déterminée envers l’ennemi occupant israélien car les objectifs de ses forces armées occupantes sont très graves pour la région.




Vingt-et-un Palestiniens ont été tués et 73 autres blessés dans la bande de Gaza, depuis vendredi 9 mars, lors de raids israéliens. Israël a effectué 36 frappes depuis vendredi, selon des sources palestiniennes. L’armée israélienne a affirmé de son côté que 180 roquettes avaient été tirées sur Israël, dont 46 avaient été interceptées par le système de défense antiroquettes Iron Dome.
Ce nouveau cycle de violences a été déclenché après « l’élimination ciblée » vendredi par Israël de Zouheir al-Qaïssi, chef des Comités de résistance populaire (CRP), mouvement basé à Gaza qui prône la lutte armée contre l’état Hébreu.
Dimanche soir, Israéliens et Palestiniens se sont adressés au Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU, alors que doit se tenir lundi à New York une réunion à haut niveau du Quartette, dont les membres (Etats-Unis, Russie, Union européenne et ONU) tentent de débloquer le processus de paix.

N’oublions pas les quelques roquettes, d’origine suspecte (qui ont tué en 15 ans pas plus qu’une douzaine d’Israéliens!), comme si cela justifiait l’assassinat d’un leader résistant gazaouis…

Les frappes aériennes d’Israël tuent 21 Palestiniens à Gaza

Israel’s Latest Ritual Slaughter

VIDEO – Mark Glenn on Press TV: ‘Palestinian suffering in Israel worse than WWII Jewish plight’

VIDO – Ralph Schoenmann [author The Hidden History of Zionism] on Press TV: Israel attacks Gaza with full support from US

Worst Air Strikes in Gaza Since Operation Cast Lead: 15 killed so far; Gaza siege enters 1733rd day.

Israeli strikes kill 12 in Gaza: Palestinian medics

Rockets from Gaza pound Israel, as airstrike kills militant group’s leader

Twelve-year-old among dead as Israel continues Gaza attack

IDF official: Iron Dome technical failure led to missile strike in Israel’s south
Défaillance technique du « dôme de fer »? On dirait plutôt qu’ils le ferment délibérément pour laisser entrer les roquettes… Ce bouclier anti-missile est supposé fonctionner normalement, mais ce bouclier s’avère être un désastre pour l’image d’Israël: Israël perd tout son capital de sympathie sans ces roquettes.

Israel on alert for attack as Netanyahu vows to strike Gaza terrorists

Iran: Israel’s Gaza raids ‘war crimes’ Islamic Republic’s foreign ministry urges rights groups to condemn Israel’s ‘abhorrent violation of human rights’

Israelis build the world’s biggest detention centre

L’armée israélienne ferme deux télévisions palestiniennes

Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza for a 4th day

Gaza Carnage as Israel’s Statement of Purpose to the entire world viz a viz ‘anti-Semitism’

Netanyahu Discusses Ground Invasion of Gaza

Israel TV celebrity, wife of vice PM demands bombing, “suffering” of Gaza civilians

Les frappes aériennes d’Israël tuent 21 Palestiniens à Gaza

Israel’s bogus case for bombing Gaza obscures political motives

Poursuite de la terreur israélienne : on attend la « no Flying Zone » !

Jews must fight evil Op-ed: Targeted killings of terror leaders moral acts in line with Jewish value of self-defense

L’attaque contre Gaza: un mensonge sioniste de plus

Sur ce blog:


Pendant qu’on regarde ailleurs, Israël s’offre discrètement une nouvelle opération « Plomb Durci »


Prévisible veto américain sur la reconnaissance de la Palestine à l’Onu…


Israël poursuit ses bombardements contre des civils dans Gaza: au tour des F-16, des armes illégales et d’une centaine de tanks de nettoyer la place


« La pire variété d’antisémitisme qui soit »: L’antisionisme, cible prioritaire des extrémistes juifs


Les avorteurs de l’État palestinien


Déni de l’holocauste palestinien (Nakba) et criminalisation de sa mémoire par Israël


Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale


Pourim 2011 (19 et 20 mars) et l’attaque atlanto-sioniste en Libye


La guerre en Irak était une célébration de Pourim


« Le visage de la vengeance juive »

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

http://crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2008/05/mccain0508.jpg

John McCain: U.S. should bomb Syria

McCain Calls for Bombing Syria ‘We Should Have Learned From Libya’

Israel’s No.1 asset in the Senate calls for airstrikes against Syria

McCain calls for airstrike on Syria Statement is as much a critique of President Barack Obama as a rallying call for an international military campaign, accusing the president of being too soft on Assad.

McCain slams military brass for inaction on Syria

Canada sanctions Syria, McCain calls for air strikes: John Baird, Canada’s Foreign Minister, closes embassy, says « Assad must go »; McCain says US should lead int’l strikes.

Israel wants Syrian govt. toppled: Military intelligence chief

Media Propagates Myth of Israel’s Non-Involvement in Syria

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

McCain and Lieberman meet with the Free Syria Army

John McCain–’Shameful’ that US is not arming Syrian thugs

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

BHL le philosophe demande a Hollande d’intervenir militairement en Syrie

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible

CIA officers regulating arms traffic to Syria opposition groups

Armed groups in Syria receive weapons from Israel

Former Mossad Chief: Arab Spring ‘Incredible Opportunity for Israel »

WINEP provides forum for Syrian National Council — and cover for Israel

Syrie : Des mensonges qui ne changeront pas la dure réalité pour l’Occident

SYRIE : Cinq longues minutes de vérité sur la Cinq

Making Sense of a Rightwing Israeli Institute’s Ambivalent View of Arab Democracy

Syria Strategy looks like Bloody Repeat

MUST READ–Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: “Break Syria into Pieces”

 

Big Powers Move In On Syria: WW3 Set To Blow?

Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: « Break Syria into Pieces » by Michel Chossudovsky

A timely article in the Jerusalem Post last month brings to the forefront the unspoken objective of US foreign policy, namely the breaking up of Syria as a sovereign nation state –along ethnic and religious lines– into several separate and « independent » political entities. The article also confirms the role of Israel in the process of political destabilization of  Syria.  The JP article is titled: « Veteran Kurdish politician calls on Israel to support the break-up of Syria‘ (by Jonathan Spyer) (The Jerusalem Post (May 16, 2012)

The objective of the US sponsored armed insurgency is –with the help of Israel– to « Break Syria into Pieces ».

The « balkanisation of the Syrian Arab Republic » is to be carried out by fostering sectarian divisions, which will eventually lead to a « civil war » modelled on the former Yugoslavia. Last month, Syrian « opposition militants » were dispatched to Kosovo to organize training sessions using the « terrorist expertise » of the US sponsored Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in fighting the Yugoslav armed forces.

Sherkoh Abbas, President of the US based Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria (KNA)  has « called on Israel  to support the break-up of Syria into a series of federal structures based on the country’s various ethnicities. » (Ibid)

One possible « break-up scenario » pertaining to Syria, which constitutes a secular multi-ethnic society, would be the formation of separate and  « independent » Sunni, Alawite-Shiite, Kurdish and Druze states:   “We need to break Syria into pieces,” Abbas said. (Quoted in JP, op. cit., emphasis added).

« The Syrian Kurdish dissident argued that a federal Syria, separated into four or five regions on an ethnic basis, would also serve as a natural “buffer” for Israel against both Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist forces. » (Ibid.).  

Ironically, while Islamist forces are said to constitute the main threat to the Jewish State, Tel Aviv is providing covert support to the Islamist Free Syrian Army (FSA).


Map 1

Meeting behind Closed Doors at the US State Department

A top level US State Department meeting was held in May with members of the Syrian Kurdish opposition. In attendance were representatives of the Kurdish National Council (KNC),  Robert Stephen Ford, the outgoing US ambassador to Syria (who has played a key role in channelling support to the rebels) as well as Frederic C. Hof, a former business partner of Richard Armitage, who currently serves as the administration’s « special coordinator on Syria ». (Ibid). The delegation also met with Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman.

Frederic C. Hof, Robert Stephen Ford and Jeffrey Feltman are the State Department’s key Syria policy-makers, with close links to the Syrian Free Army (SFA) and the Syrian National Council (SNC).

 


Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman


Frederic C. Hof, The Administration’s « special coordinator on Syria »


Robert S. Ford, outgoing US Ambassador to Syria

The public statements of KNA leader Sherkoh Abbas in the wake of the State Department meeting suggest that the political fracturing of the Syrian Arab Republic along ethnic and religious lines as well as the creation of an « independent Kurdistan » were discussed. « State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner described [the meeting's] purpose as part of ‘ongoing efforts… to help the Syrian [Kurdish] opposition build a more cohesive opposition to Assad.’”  (Ibid).

The KNA leader called upon Washington to support the creation of a separate Kurdish State consisting of  « an autonomous region in Syria; joining the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq – which borders the Kurdish region in Syria; or perhaps an even larger Kurdish state » [Greater Kurdistan].

« The Kurdish people, in all parts of Kurdistan, seek the right to form an independent Kurdish state. We can only achieve this cherished goal with the help of the western democracies, and first and foremost the U.S.” said Sherkoh Abbas. (Syria: An Alternative, Choice, Ekurd.net, May 22, 2012)

It is worth noting, in this regard, that the creation of a « Greater Kurdistan » has been envisaged for several years by the Pentagon as part of a broader « Plan for Redrawing the Middle East ».(See map 2 below)

This option, which appears unlikely in the near future, would go against the interests of Turkey, a staunch ally of both the US and Israel. Another scenario, which is contemplated by Ankara would consist in the annexation to Turkey of parts of Syrian Kurdistan. (See map above).

« Greater Kurdistan » would include portions of Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey as conveyed in Coronel  Ralph Peters (ret) celebrated map of « The New Middle East » (see below). (For Further details see Mahdi Nazemroaya’s November 2006 Global Research article).

Colonel Peters taught at the US Military Academy.


- by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2006-11-18
Towards the balkanization (division) and finlandization (pacification) of the Middle East
Map 2. The New Middle East

The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006,
Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).

Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers.
This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.

 

Lieberman-McCain Strike Again

Written by Maidhc Ó Cathail

April 11, 2012 at 9:11 am

According to Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin, Sens. John McCain and Joe Lieberman are “on a surprise trip” to the Turkish-Syrian border to meet with leaders of the Free Syria Army. Rehashing the rhetoric that led the United States into wars in Kosovo, Iraq and Libya, the deadly duo proclaimed:

If America still stands for the cause of oppressed people who are fighting for their freedom, and justice, and deliverance from tyranny, we cannot abandon the people of Syria. We cannot shirk our responsibility to lead. Our deepest values and interests compel us to act in Syria, and we must do so before it is too late.

The only “surprise” is that Israel doesn’t try to cover its tracks better.

 

 

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, June 8, 2012
(…) Pentagon and US State department documents as well as independent reports confirm that military action against Syria has been contemplated by Washington and Tel Aviv for more than 20 years.

Targeting Iran, « Protecting Israel » 

According to James P. Rubin, the war plans directed against Syria are intimately related to those pertaining to Iran. They are part of the same US-Israeli military agenda which consists in weakening Iran with a view to « protecting Israel ». The latter objective is to be carried out through a pre-emptive attack against Iran:  « We’re not done with the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iran » says James P. Rubin. (…)
The military roadmap to Tehran goes through Damascus. The unspoken objective of the US-NATO-Israeli sponsored insurgency in Syria is to destabilize Syria as a Nation State and undermine Iran’s influence in the region (including its support of the Palestinian Liberation movement and Hezbollah). The underlying objective is also to eliminate all forms of resistance to the Zionist State:

« That is where Syria comes in, says James P, Rubin. It is the strategic relationship between the Islamic Republic and the Assad regime that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security. Over the three decades of hostility between Iran and Israel, a direct military confrontation has never occurred — but through Hezbollah, which is sustained and trained by Iran via Syria, the Islamic Republic has proven able to threaten Israeli security interests.

The collapse of the Assad regime would sunder this dangerous alliance. Defense Minister Ehud Barak, arguably the most important Israeli decision-maker on this question, recently told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that the Assad regime’s fall « will be a major blow to the radical axis, major blow to Iran…. It’s the only kind of outpost of the Iranian influence in the Arab world … and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. » (The Real Reason to Intervene in Syria – By James P. Rubin | Foreign Policy, June 2, 2012, emphasis added)

US-Israeli War Plans directed against Syria

Rubin candidly outlines the contours of US military intervention in Syria, which is to be implemented in close liaison with Israel. A diplomatic solution will not work, nor will economic sanctions: « only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator’s stance » says Rubin (…)

While the participation of Israel in military operations is not mentioned, the thrust of Rubin’s article points to active cooperation between Washington and Tel Aviv in military and intelligence affairs, including the conduct of covert operations in support of the opposition rebels. This coordination would also be carried out in the context of the bilateral military-intelligence cooperation agreement between Israel and Turkey.

« Coming to the rescue of the Syrian people » under a fake « humanitarian » R2P mandate is intended to destabilize Syria, weaken Iran and enable Israel to exert greater political control and influence over neighboring Arab states including Lebanon and Syria.

A war on Syria is also a war on Palestine. It would weaken  the resistance movement in the occupied territories. It would reinforce the Netanyahu government’s ambitions to create a « Greater Israel », initially, through the outright annexation of the Palestinian territories:

« With the Islamic Republic deprived of its gateway to the Arab world, the Israelis’ rationale for a bolt from the blue attack on its nuclear facilities would diminish. A new Syrian regime might eventually even resume the frozen peace talks regarding the Golan Heights. In Lebanon, Hezbollah would be cut off from its Iranian sponsor, since Syria would no longer be a transit point for Iranian training, assistance, and missiles. All these strategic benefits combined with the moral purpose of saving tens of thousands of civilians from murder at the hands of the Assad regime … make intervention in Syria a calculated risk, but still a risk worth taking. » (Rubin, op cit)

War Crimes in the name of human rights: What we really need is « Regime Change » in the United States of America…. and Israel.

 

 

TUT Podcast June 6, 2012

Syria’s destruction in order to create a ‘Greater Israel’–a plan in the works for a long time.

We are joined by ‘George’ from the Syrian Free Press network to discuss this and other relevant issues.

Download Here

FLASHBACK juin 2011: La déstabilisation de la Syrie et la guerre élargie au Moyen-Orient

VIDEO – Jean Marie Le Pen sur la Syrie, l’Iran et l’arme nucléaire

The Crusade for Syria: A Big Lie

NATO’s ‘Civil War’ Machine Rolls Into Syria

Unholy Alliance Forming Against Syria Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Brussels, Arab puppet regimes, Extremist Wahhabis, Al-Qaeda

Syria Under Attack by Globalist Death Squad Experts

SYRIE. Opération terroriste appuyée par les États-Unis: Tuer des civils innocents pour justifier une guerre humanitaire

Top IDF officer: Terrorist threat in Syria could be directed at Israel: The deterioration of Syria’s central regime could lead to a growing terrorist threat against Israel, a top Israel Defense…

Le massacre de Houla fait partie du nettoyage ethnique du gouvernorat d’Homs prévu comme base arrière pour l’ASL

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

May 28 2012: 108 Syrians Killed Just prior to Annan’s meeting with Assad (ce massacre ne saurait être un hasard, il fut clairement programmé pour affaiblir Assad juste avant sa rencontre avec des émissaires de l’ONU!)

US Blames Russia, Iran for Upcoming Syria War

Blackwater agents involved in Syria unrest

French president says Syria’s Assad has to go (Les estie de caves qui croyaient qu les choses allaient changer avec un socialiste!! Plein d’Arabes-musulmans stupides ont voté pour Hollande!)

UN-backed action in Syria is an option, Hollande says

Romney Calls for Action on Syria, but His Party Is Divided

The BBC’s Photo Fib of a Syrian Massacre (des images de bébés irakiens tués détournées pour fins de propagande: pour illustrer un supposé massacre en Syrie…)

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible (Il s’est pas montré aussi inquiet lors des bombardements de civils libanais – incluant bien sûr femmes et enfants – lors de l’attaque israélienne contre le Liban en 2006.)

Rebels behind Houla massacre, US plan to destabilize Syria in full swing

The Houla Massacre: US-Sponsored Terrorists « Killed Families Loyal to the Government »

Oh la la, BBC : Une photo d’Irak pour illustrer le massacre de Houla ?

Le massacre de Houla était planifié et a été instrumentalisé

MEDIA DISINFORMATION: West Desperately Attempts to Spin Syrian Crisis

SYRIA, Atrocities were not committed by the government but by armed gangs Vatican News Service refutes Western media reports

UN Report on Houla Massacre Conflicts With Rebel Accounts

Russian Journalist Exposes Propaganda Lies about Houla Massacre- by Stephen Lendman

Syrian President Assad vows to keep fighting Western-backed terrorists

The Houla Hoaxsters

Clinton: Russia Must Embrace Regime Change in Syria

In address to parliament, Assad blames Syria crisis on ‘outside forces’

Antiwar.com yet again obscures Israel’s role in Syria

Pro-Assads were ‘picked’ by killers in Houla massacre: US author

VIDEO – Mark Glenn / PressTv

UK to set up camps inside Syria to help rebels

‘US, Israel plot to topple al-Assad Govt’

a Syrie au programme du Bilderberg

Le narratif syrien de l’Occident se base sur “un mec dans un appartement au Royaume-Uni”

Un propagandiste de l’opposition syrienne dans un appartement en Angleterre, la seule source citée par la presse occidentale

Advanced State of Readiness: US Military Lobbies for War with Syria

SYRIA: NATO’s Next « Humanitarian » War? ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK

Chantage contre la Russie : les États-Unis promeuvent les massacres pour justifier la guerre contre la Syrie

Propaganda War: The Houla Massacre Committed by The West’s “Free Syrian Army” But They Accuse Syrian Gov’t

How not to stop the violence in Syria — Elie Wiesel’s latest bright idea
By Maidhc Ó Cathail
June 9, 2012
Touted on Twitter as a “must-read” by John McCain, Elie Wiesel had an op-ed in yesterday’s Washington Post titled “How to stop the Syria massacre.” Clearly distressed that the United States appears to be finally growing weary of fighting wars in Israel’s increasingly destabilized backyard, the prosperous Holocaust survivor lays on the guilt trip:

Military intervention? No. Why not? Because the American people are tired of waging distant wars. Because American families have lost too many sons and daughters in far-away conflicts. Should Syrian families suffer because of the help we have given others? Because of the sacrifices we have already made?

The warmongering Nobel Peace Prize laureate has another bright idea, however:

I am not sure that armed assistance is the only solution. Economic sanctions have proved to be relatively futile elsewhere. But why not imagine yet another option that might produce a dramatic effect?
Why not warn Assad that, unless he stops the murderous policy he is engaged in, he will be arrested and brought to the international criminal court in the Hague and charged with committing crimes against humanity?
Read the rest of this entry »

LOL!!! Netanyahu–Assad slaughtering Syrian civilians with the aid of Iran, Hezbollah

Report: Rebels Responsible for Houla Massacre

SYRIE : Les rebelles sont responsables du massacre de Houla

Imran Hossein–NATO Wants Turkey To Invade Syria

Military: Syria Chemical Stocks Threaten Israel

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrie: l’OTAN prépare une vaste opération d’intoxication

L’affaire de Houla illustre le retard du renseignement occidental en Syrie

« Humanitarian War Criminals » in High Office: Was the Houla Massacre Ordered by the Western Military Alliance?

Un nouveau massacre en Syrie Nouvelles révélations sur les victimes de Houla.

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrian rebels’ arsenal includes remote-controlled truck bombs

US accelerates preparations for ‘no-fly zone’ in Syria

‘Dozens of Kuwaiti jihadists’ join different nationalities to enlist in Free Syrian Army

Israel wants airstrikes against Syria: Analyst

John Bolton: Syria, World War and the destruction of America

Syrian Foreign Minister–’We are not in Civil War but rather fighting terrorists’

America’s interest in Syria is Israel

Russia Accuses U.S. of Supplying Arms to Syria Rebels to Fight Assad

Amnesty accuses Syrian forces of killings, destruction to deter residents from aiding rebels

Israel lobby celebrates Treasury’s successful use of “financial tools” to support Arab Spring

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels By Maidhc Ó Cathail

Israel must use the ‘opportunity’ provided by the Arab Spring, says former IDF chief-designate

Syrie : les miliciens battent en retraite

Syrian Liberators, Bearing Toy Guns

U.N. Observers In Syria Suspend Mission After Escalating Violence

US backtracks on claims Russia is arming Syrian regime

U.S. says weighing ‘next steps’ with partners on Syria

U.S. military completes initial planning for Syria

VIDEO – CIA, MI6 agents direct massacres in Syria: American analyst (avec Stephen Lendman, juif pas juifiste)

Israel may use military force ‘to secure’ Syria’s alleged chemical arsenal

Israel’s Peres says he hopes Syrian rebels “will win”

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels

 

VIDEO – Roland Dumas : les Anglais préparaient la guerre pour ISRAËL en Syrie deux ans avant les manifestations en 2011
Voir aussi: Roland Dumas, ancien ministre français des affaires étrangères: « Israël contrôle le service de renseignement français »

 

Sur ce blog:


La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur…

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

McCain et Lieberman: « bombardez la Libye! »

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

L’ancien directeur de l’unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA, Michael Scheuer accuse Israël de détenir le Congrès et d’entraîner les USA vers le désastre d’une guerre contre l’Iran

 

 

Sur ce blog:

FALSE FLAG EN INDE: L’ANCIEN CHEF DE L’UNITÉ ANTI-BEN LADEN À LA CIA POINTE DU DOIGT ISRAEL ET L’ARABIE SAOUDITE

LA JUDÉE DÉCLARE LA GUERRE À RON PAUL

L’ancien responsable de l’Unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA estime que l’Islam radical est une menace imaginaire.

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

Eliot Cohen Returns as Romney’s Man on Iran

By Max Blumenthal

In 2005, a group of graduate students at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced and International Studies (SAIS) participated in the school’s annual diplomatic simulation. The high pressure scenario required the students to negotiate a resolution to a standoff with a nuclear-armed “Republic of Pakistan.”Mara Karlin, a student known for her hawkish politics on Israel and the Middle East, played president of the U.S.A.
Though most of the participants were confident they could head off amilitary conflictwith diplomatic measures,Ms. Karlin jumped the gun. According to a former SAIS student, not only did Ms. Karlin order a nuclear strike on Pakistan, she also took the opportunity to nuke Iran. Her classmates were shocked. It was the first time in 45 years that a simulation concluded with the deployment of a nuke.
That year, Ms. Karlin received a plum job in the Bush administration’s Department of Defense where, according to her bio, she was “intimately involved in formulating U.S. policy on Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Israel-Palestinian affairs.” Lebanon was a special area of focus for Ms. Karlin. She claims to have helped structure the Lebanese armed forces and coordinated relations between the U.S. and Lebanese militaries.
According to the former SAIS student, Ms. Karlin was a favorite of Eliot Cohen, an ultra-hawkish professor of strategic studies at SAIS, which is regarded in American foreign policy circles as a training ground for the neo-conservative movement.
Today, Cohen is among Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney’s top campaign advisers.
He is the primary author of Romney’s foreign policy white paper, which attacks Obama for “currying favor with [America’s] enemies” and “ostentatiously shunning Jerusalem.”
The paper urges a policy of regime change in Iran including possible coordination with Israel on military strikes, allegedly to prevent the Iranian regime from developing a nuclear weapon. It is an aggressive Republican election season document presenting a concoction of post-9-11 unilateralism and unvarnished imperialism as the antidote to a sitting president Cohen accused of “unilateral disarmament in the diplomatic and moral sphere.” More importantly, it suggests that a Romney administration’s foreign policy might look remarkably similar to—and perhaps more extreme than—that of the Bush administration.
Cohen rose through the ranks of the Republican foreign policy elite as a protégé of Paul Wolfowitz, the former assistant secretary of defense who is credited with playing a central role in the push for invading Iraq. Stephen Walt, a professor of international affairs at Harvard University’s School of Government who has been on the receiving end of aggressive attacks by Cohen, called Cohen “a classic neo-conservative.” Walt said: “He is constantly fretting about alleged U.S. vulnerabilities, consistently supportive of increased defense spending and generally inclined to favor U.S. intervention in other countries. Second, like virtually all neo-conservatives, he is also deeply attached to Israel, as well as to the United States.”
Despite Cohen’s deep Israeli ties, he has proved extremely sensitive to critiques of the connection.When Walt and John Mearsheimer, the latter a professor of International Relations at the University of Chicago, published their widely debated paper on the Israeli lobby in 2006,* Cohen authored one of the first attempts to discredit their thesis about a loose coalition of individuals and organizations creating political pressure to move U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israeli direction. In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Cohen accused the authors of “kooky academic work” and “obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews.”
“Cohen’s rather hysterical reaction to our work was both typical and easy to explain,” Walt remarked.
“Given that he and other neo-conservatives had played a key role in convincing George Bush to invade Iraq in 2003, he was understandably upset when we pointed this out and provided extensive documentation of their role in the run-up to this disastrous war.
He could not refute our logic or our evidence, however, so he chose tomisrepresent our views and smear us falsely as anti-Semites and conspiracy theorists.”
With the last battalions of U.S. troops preparing to redeploy from Iraq to other conflict zones, Cohen is homing in on Iran. In a September 2009 editorial for The Wall Street Journal, he dismissed diplomacy and sanctions as feasible means of curbing Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions.
“The choices are now what they ever were: an American or an Israeli strike, which would probably cause a substantialwar, or living in aworldwith Iranian nuclear weapons, which may also result in war, perhaps nuclear, over a longer period of time,” he wrote.
As tensions between Israel and Iran rise to unprecedented levels, and Israel’s leaders beseech the U.S. to join a military strike, Cohen’s visions of regime change seem closer to realization than ever.
For him and the neo-conservative policy elite, a Romney victory in November might deliver the next “big prize.”
——
* Walt and Mearsheimer’s book The Israel Lobby & U.S. Foreign Policy (hardcover, 484 pages $30 plus $6 S&H;) is available from AFP.Send order to AFP, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite. 100, Washington,D.C. 20003. To order by major credit card, call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS.
——
Max Blumenthal is an independent journalist who maintains the popular news and commentary website maxblumenthal.com.

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:.

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Romney blasts Obama on Israel, Iran

Romney Tied to Terrorism GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney looked like a deer caught in the headlights when he was asked if he supported an international, anti-American terrorist organization with a bloody record for killing innocent civilians thousands of times worse than al Qaeda. This “expert on international affairs” claimed he never had heard of them. Then, like a lying politician, he promised: “I’ll take a look at the issue.” Video taken at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire shows Romney quickly waving the issue aside and hurrying on to another question.

 Le général Richard Myers et Eliot Cohen.
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
Cabal of Rabid Warhawks Advising Mitt Romney
The American media is strangely silent about Mitt Romney’s shadow National Security Council, the 50-plus madmen Romney has surrounded himself with as “foreign policy advisers”—many of whom helped push the U.S. into the disastrous war against Iraq. Romney had the chutzpa to name his foreign policy after the Project for a NewAmerican Century, the neo-con dream of a new Pearl Harbor that was fulfilled on 9-11. Several include:

MICHAEL HAYDEN: On CNN (2010), former CIA director and prominent torture advocate, Michael Hayden said attacking Iran over its nuclear program might not be a bad idea. “In my personal thinking . . . I have begun to consider that [nuclear war] may not be the worst of all possible outcomes.”

ELIOT COHEN: Insanely used the 9-11 attacks to advocate war with Iran. Cohen, director of the strategic studies program at Johns Hopkins University, said either we attack Iran, or it gets nukes. “The choices are now what they ever were: an American or an Israeli strike, which would probably cause a substantial war.”

ERIC EDELMAN: Former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney. Earlier this year in an article in the Council on Foreign Relations’s publication Foreign Affairs, Edelman, along with two other co-authors, said that the U.S. will either have to attack Iran or contain its nuclear weapons capability. “The military option should not be dismissed because of the appealing but flawed notion that containment is a relatively easy or low-risk solution to a very difficult problem,” they wrote.

NORM COLEMAN: Former Republican senator from Minnesota. Said that if Israel ever attacks Iran, the United States should join in. Coleman said: “The United States is going to be part of that.”

KIM HOLMES: The Heritage Foundation’s Kim Holmes worried that negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program might be preventing the U.S. from using military force to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Holmes called peace a “serious mistake.”
Should Mitt Romney become president, get ready for more undeclared war, bigger government and a further expansion of the police state.

http://incogman.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/NEOCONS.jpg
Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Lewis « Scooter » Libby
La liste des contributeurs au document du PNAC « Reconstruire les défenses americaines » (« Rebuilding America’s Defenses ») compilé en 2000, qui a appelé à un « nouveau Pearl Harbor »: Roger Barnett, du US Naval War College, Alvin Bernstein, de la National Defense University, Stephen Cambone, de la National Defense University, Eliot Cohen, de la Nitze School of Advanced International Studies de la Johns Hopkins University, Devon Gaffney Cross, du Donors’ Forum of International Affairs, Thomas Donnelly, du Project for the New American Century (PNAC), David Epstein, du Bureau du Secrétaire de la Défense, Net Assessment, David Fautua, Lieutenant Colonel de l’armée américaine, Dan Goure, du Center for Strategic and International Studies, Donald Kagan, de l’Université Yale, Fred Kagan, de l’Académie militaire américaine de West Point, Robert Kagan, du Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Robert Killebrew Colonel américain (à la retraite ), William Kristol du journal The Weekly Standard, Mark Lagon de la Commission sénatoriale des affaires étrangères, James Lasswell de la GAMA Corporation, I. Lewis Libby de Dechert Price & Rhoads, Robert Martinage du Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, Phil Meilinger du US Naval War College, Mackubin Owens du US Naval War College, Steve Rosen de l’Université Harvard, Gary Schmitt du PNAC, Abraham Shulsky de RAND Corporation, Michael Vickers du Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, Barry Watts Northrop Grumman Corporation, Paul Wolfowitz Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, et Dov Zakheim de System Planning Corporation, comprend une proportion relativement élevée de noms juifs. Il y a beaucoup plus d’individus associés au PNAC. (…)
http://rackjite.com/graphics/neocons.jpg
John Bolton, Eliot Abrams, Robert Kagan, Michael Ledeen, William Kristol, Frank Gaffney Jr.

Sur ce blog:
Michele Bachmann est comme Sarah Palin: plus sioniste que les sionistes

Rick Santorum, le nouveau candidat sioniste le plus en vue aux États-Unis, représente un grave danger pour la liberté d’expression

Sheldon Adelson: « je suis le juif le plus riche au monde »

Selon Frank J. Gaffney (PNAC), les Frères Musulmans ont infiltré et contrôlent l’administration Obama

‘A CLEAN BREAK’: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient

La Judée déclare la guerre à Ron Paul

11 septembre et tout le reste: c’était pas les musulmans!

Le mouvement juif Néo-conservateur : du trotskisme au bellicisme sioniste

Les fauteurs de guerres

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

Pourquoi Zundel aime tant les États-Unis: un constitutionnaliste conservateur rejette la version officielle de la Seconde Guerre mondiale et dénonce les guerres par proxy du sionisme

AFP Reader Runs for Congress
by Ralph Forbes
In line with strict conservative constitutionalists like maverick Republican Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Arthur Jones, a U.S. congressional candidate in Illinois, has thrown his hat in the ring. He is hoping to take hismessage toWashington that Americans are fed up with an out-of-control central government.
In 2008, Jones ran for the third congressional district of Illinois at which time he received 33 percent of the vote in the Republican primary.
Now Jones is again on the ballot. This time, however, he has the advantage of having secured the top position over two other Republicans, which traditionally garners an extra 10 percent of the vote.
A longtime AFP reader, Jones says he is “mad as hell over the way Wall Street and the politicians are looting this country and sticking it to the middle class. They steal our jobs, steal our money through taxes and inflation, steal our homes through foreclosures, rob our children of their future—and trample on our Godgiven rights if we complain.”
A major issue in Jones’s campaign consists of the numerous free trade treaties, which he says are the real cause of the high unemployment rate in this country. Starting with NAFTA, said Jones, the 17 free trade treaties have cost U.S. workers 43 million jobs.
Jones added that the main reason he decided to run again for Congress is his discovery by accident that incumbent Democrat Daniel Lipinski has been “spear-heading” the drive in Congress to start a war against Iran. His source for this information was the American Israel Political Affairs Committee, or AIPAC as it is known. AIPAC’s website has bragged how Lipinski and Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) are leading the drive in Congress to increase economic sanctions on Iran’s dealings with communist China.
“Lipinski is a warmonger, plain and simple,” said Jones. “He is willing to risk starting a war with Iran to appease the Israeli lobby and a handful of Zionist Jews in the 3rd congressional district.”
The recent passage of the National Defense Authorization Act is a bill Jones wants repealed. “This bill will turn our country from a land of freedom into a Zionist-run police state,” said Jones. Among other things, Jones is a strong supporter of the right to carry a concealed weapon for personal protection.
On the issue of illegal aliens, Jones is equally plainspoken: “No amnesty. Find them, and then deport them.” And on the issue of morality, Jones is “totally opposed to same-sex marriages,” and, “Abortion, in my Christian way of thinking, is murder.”
Write to Jones for Congress at P.O. Box 598, Lyons, Ill. 60534. His primary isMarch 20, 2012. Youmay also call him at (708) 442-6334.
——
Ralph Forbes is a freelance writer based in Arkansas. He is also a member of AFP’s Southern Bureau. Contact him at rforbes@centurytel.net

GOP Congressional Candidate: Holocaust “Blackest Lie In History”

by David Badash on February 29, 2012

Post image for GOP Congressional Candidate: Holocaust “Blackest Lie In History”

A GOP Congressional candidate says the Holocaust never happened, calls it “an international extortion racket by the Jews,” and adds that he believes it is “the blackest lie in history.” Arthur Jones, 64, is running as a Republican in Illinois as a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives. He additionally questions America’s support of Israel, and claims that the U.S. government is aiding “Latino Reds and Radicals such as La Raza,” who “are working to create ”Atzlan”, a new Marxist country out of the states of the southwest.” Fortunately, Jones only has 64 “likes” on his Facebook page. Sadly, you can bet he’ll find an audience, and there will be plenty who will vote for him. Not enough to get elected, but enough.
Via Patch.com:

“As far as I’m concerned, the Holocaust is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews,” Jones said. “It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV.
“The more survivors, the more lies that are told.”
A member of the Nationalist Socialist Party in his younger days, Jones took part in the Nazis’ march on Chicago’s Marquette Park in 1978. While he doesn’t deny nor repudiate his “past affiliations,” he says he votes Republican “90 percent of the time.”
“Philosophically, I’m a National Socialist,” Jones said. “Officially, I don’t belong to any party except my own, the America First Committee.”
Jones hopes three’s a charm after blowing his retirement savings on two prior congressional runs. He hopes to win the Republican primary and go on to challenge Lipinski this November. The 3rd District covers portions of Chicago’s South Side and a large swath of the south suburbs.(…)

Daily Mail: ‘The blackest lie in history’: Republican congressional candidate says the Holocaust never happened

  • Illinois candidate Arthur Jones, 64, ‘organises Nazi events to celebrate Hitler’s birthday’
  • ‘The Holocaust is an international extortion racket’
  • Candidate has spent life savings on congressional run

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 10:49 AM on 1st March 2012

A congressional candidate running as a Republican in the upcoming Illinois primary says the ‘Holocaust never happened.’
Arthur Jones, 64, who organizes neo-Nazi events around Adolf Hitler’s birthday, hopes to be the Republican candidate chosen to run against
Rep. Dan Lipinski in Illinois’ 3rd Congressional District.

‘As far as I’m concerned, the Holocaust is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews,’ Jones said.

‘It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV. The more survivors, the more lies that are told.’
Holocaust denial is illegal in a number of European countries and carries a prison sentence for people who break the law.

Jones, a Vietnam War veteran, was previously a member of the Nationalist Socialist White People’s Party and has taken part in a Nazi march.
‘Philosophically, I’m a National Socialist,’ Jones said. ‘Officially, I don’t belong to any party except my own, the America First Committee.’

Nazis: Jones claims to be a former member of the National Socialist party

Nazis: Jones claims to be a former member of the National Socialist party

Jones has already blown his retirement savings on two prior congressional runs – with no success.
Jones, an insurance salesman, also condemned fellow Republicans Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney as ‘war-mongering fools.’

Competition: Arthur Jones hopes to run against Democrat Dan Lipinski

Competition: Arthur Jones hopes to run against Democrat Dan Lipinski (pictured)

He said: ‘These war-mongering fools in congress like Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney—we can’t let Iran have one nuclear weapon but we let Israel have all the nuclear weapons they want. This is ridiculous.’
He claims that he is running again partly because of what he describes as Lipinski’s ‘strange affiliation’ with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
He describes the body as the ‘American Israel Pro Israel Affairs Committee’.
The candidate also compares today’s conditions in the United States to Germany at the end of World War I.
‘Our country is falling apart economically, politically, culturally, militarily,’ he said. ‘We are going down.’
In an online questionnaire, Jones admitted he has been arrested for ‘minor street skirmishes with Leftists.’
The state Republican party has tried to keep the candidate off the ballot because of his anti-semitic views, even though he has gathered enough signatures to qualify.

Vendredi 2 mars 2012
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/arthur-jones.jpg
Un candidat républicain au Congrès américain a déclaré haut et fort que « l’Holocauste n’a jamais eu lieu » et que c’est le plus sombre mensonge de l’Histoire.
Arthur Jones, en concurrence dans l’Illinois avec le démocrate Dan Lipinski [juif] pour le Congrès dans le 3ème district, a fait remarquer que la revendication d’un assassinat de millions de juifs et autres personnes par les nazis pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale « n’est rien de plus qu’un racket international organisé par les juifs« , a rapporté le Hoffington Post.
« C’est le plus sombre mensonge de l’Histoire, des millions de dollars sont extorqués par les juifs qui racontent ce mythe de malheur et de lamentations dans leurs livres, leurs films, pièces de théâtre et à la télévision » a-t-il ajouté.
« Le plus il y a de survivants, le plus ils racontent de mensonges » a précisé le candidat de 64 ans.
Jones a déclaré qu’il espérait remporter l’investiture républicaine primaire et continuer à affronter le démocrate Dan Lipinski en novembre prochain.
Il s’est également interrogé sur les rapports étranges de Lipinski avec le puissant lobby juif pro-israélien sévissant aux Etats-Unis, l’AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee).
Jones a souligné que le lobby pro-israélien « se vantait sur son site Web » de la façon dont Lipinski était « le fer de lance des efforts à la Chambre [des États-Unis] des représentants, conjointement avec un membre du Congrès juif de la Virginie du nom de Frank Wolf, pour durcir le ton envers l’Iran incluant le fermeture de toutes les exportations de pétrole vers la Chine qui pourraient conduire à la Troisième Guerre mondiale ».
Jones, un vétéran de la guerre du Vietnam, a également comparé les conditions actuelles aux Etats-Unis à la situation en Allemagne après la fin de la Première Guerre mondiale et a insisté en affirmant « notre pays est en train de s’effondrer économiquement, politiquement, culturellement, militairement. »
« Nous sombrons » a-t-il constaté avec colère.
«Ces va-t-en-guerre fous du Congrès comme [les candidats républicains] Rick Santorum et Newt Gingrich, et Mitt Romney – nous ne pouvons pas laisser l’Iran avoir une arme nucléaire, mais nous avons permis à Israël d’avoir toutes les armes nucléaires qu’ils veulent», a déclaré Jones. « C’est ridicule. »
Le président iranien Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a appelé à plusieurs reprises pour un examen historique de «l’holocauste» dans un effort pour découvrir les réalités de cette partie de la seconde guerre mondiale la plus médiatisée au monde. Ses remarques, cependant, ont provoqué l’indignation parmi les puissances occidentales pro-israéliennes, l’étiquetant aussitôt comme un  « contestataire de l’holocauste. » [1]
[1] nous avons traduit le terme anglais « denier » par « contestataire », pour changer un peu de « négationiste » qui ne veut rien dire.
Sources : Presstv.ir  / Eutimes.net
Traduction : Propagandes.info

NDLR :
Les sites pro-juifs ont repris cette information en la truffant de « Néo-Nazi » et autres daubes, mais la version la plus objective et la plus référencée est sans conteste celle du site de la télévision Iranienne PressTV.
L’Iran devient la première nation officiellement révisionniste. En France, le rejet de la loi mémorielle Arménienne a éveillé quelques consciences, Dieudo avait abattu ses cartes depuis longtemps, Soral vient de le faire, Blanrue est poursuivi par la Licra pour son film « Un Homme » qui met en vedette Robert Faurisson, l’insuccès de Marine Le Pen et de son épuration a obligé son paternel a remettre un peu d’huile sur le feu… Ne zappez pas ! C’est maintenant qu’on va savoir qui est qui.
via propagandes info

Sur ce blog:

DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE, DEVOIR DE VITRIFIER L’IRAN

“Ils menacent de sanctions et de représailles militaires tous ceux qui émettent des doutes sur la Shoah et le 11 septembre » — Président Ahmadinejad

L’Iran ne croit pas la fable convenue du 11 septembre ; les États-Unis en mal de casus belli l’accusent d’avoir monté le coup

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Discours de la Shoah


Dieudonné et Soral, teaser du film: Discours de la Shoah, par Bernamej

http://blanrue.blogspot.ca/2012/02/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-et-frederic-ii.html

Principal organe du système nerveux et siège de la mémoire, le cerveau est le lieu de la pensée, de la réflexion, de la stratégie. Dans le cas du sionisme, une pensée obsédante habite cet organe, un fantasme plus énorme encore que toutes les autres lubies sionistes enfle démesurément et empêche l’activité d’une saine intelligence et d’une droite raison : la Shoah. La Shoah a tout envahi, le cortex cérébral, l’encéphale, toute la boîte crânienne. Chaque neurone sioniste est porteur d’une information ayant trait à la dantesque Catastrophe. Tout y conduit, y ramène, impossible d’échapper à son emprise. Il n’y a plus de place pour l’esprit ni pour l’âme. Terminé tout ça.  Seule compte la Shoah, alpha et oméga de toute pensée. Cette Shoah maladive, délirante, est devenue la religion de l’Empire atlanto-sioniste. Cette nouvelle religion, fanatique, intolérante, impose partout ses propres normes, qui sont aussi celles qui servent le plus directement les intérêts de l’Entité sioniste. La religion de la Shoah n’existerait pas sans l’Entité sioniste avec son esprit de vengeance et de conquête. Elle n’existerait pas non plus sans l’aide que lui apportent quotidiennement les médias et l’industrie cinématographique.
Le sionisme est un tout que la Shoah vient couronner. La Shoah est devenue la tête pensante (la tête devenue folle) de la stratégie sioniste de domination.

De nombreux peuples se soulèvent en ce moment contre le néolibéralisme, poumon incurable du sionisme, dont les effets délétères sont devenus évidents. Ces peuples sont soutenus par des pays d’avant-garde comme l’Iran, le Venezuela, Cuba. Chaque jour les télévisions du monde entier nous montrent ces manifestations contre le Nouvel Ordre Mondial qui commence à s’effriter comme jadis le rideau de fer en Europe.
De nombreux pays s’élèvent aussi contre la volonté impériale de l’Entité sioniste, qui affiche son mépris pour les Palestiniens et pour ses voisins proches ou lointains dont elle souhaite la disparition. On trouve, à nouveau, main dans la main, l’Iran, le Venezuela et Cuba, mais aussi la Chine ou encore la Russie, pays qui ont décidé de ne pas se laisser dicter leur conduite et d’agir en nations libres et souveraines, et non comme des valets à la manière de la France de Nicolas Sarkozy. 
Par malheur, contre cette Mémoire sioniste imposée aux peuples au détriment de leur propre histoire, cette religion devenue, selon le mot de l’intellectuel américain Norman Finkelstein, une industrie, on entend, de par le monde, trop peu de voix discordantes osant la dénoncer. Le seul homme politique qui ait officiellement évoqué ce problème est le Président iranien, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Il déclare aujourd’hui , à l’occasion d’un discours célébrant le 33ème anniversaire de la Révolution islamique de 1979 : « L’Occident et les colonialistes, pour dominer le monde, ont créé une idole qu’ils ont appelée le régime sioniste. L’esprit de cette idole est l’Holocauste (…) et la nation iranienne, avec courage et clairvoyance, a brisé l’idole, préparant la libération des peuples occidentaux ». 
Naguère, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad avait osé demander : « La Shoah est devenue une boîte noire et vous ne permettez à personne de l’ouvrir pour l’examiner (…). Si cet événement est si important, pourquoi ne nous permettez-vous pas d’en dévoiler la réalité au monde entier ? » 
En effet : pourquoi ? Si je prétendais posséder un tableau de Léonard de Vinci pendu dans mon salon, ne devrais-je pas permettre aux spécialistes de l’art de venir le contempler au lieu d’appeler la police lorsqu’on me demande un certificat d’authenticité ?
Pourquoi existe-t-il des lois dans tant de pays européens pour empêcher de remettre en cause la version officielle de l’histoire ? Pourquoi emprisonne-t-on aujourd’hui Horst Mahler, Wolfgang Frölich, Pedro Varela, Axel Möller ? Pourquoi en France, l’an passé, a-t-on jeté l’ingénieur Vincent Reynouard durant dix mois dans les geôles de la République ?
Pour avoir prononcé les phrases que j’ai citées plus haut, le Président iranien sera jugé par l’histoire digne d’un Frédéric II de Prusse, dit Frédéric le Grand, qui a jadis soutenu la liberté d’esprit de Voltaire, lequel était alors embastillé et pourchassé  dans son pays pour ses écrits jugés subversifs.

Paul-Éric Blanrue

Voir aussi:

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Blondi

Chroniques de la bête immonde: François Genoud, banquier de l’OLP et parrain du révisionnisme

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Willis Carto, père de l’édition révisionniste aux USA (avec l’aide de Genoud) et principal éditeur nationaliste et antimite au pays.

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Michael Collins Piper et la nouvelle Babylone

Chroniques de la bête immonde: le clan Kennedy antimite, haï par la communauté étrangère partout

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Hitler candidat au Nobel de la Paix

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Mise au point sur Hitler et la révolution européenne, les financiers internationaux, la juiverie sioniste, la réunion de Bilderberg…

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Parodie de procès et torture à Nuremberg

Chroniques de la bête immonde: L’Histoire contemporaine: une fable convenue

Chroniques de la bête immonde: le Hamas dénonce l’escroquerie de l’Holocauste

Chroniques de la bête immonde: Adrien Arcand

“Ils menacent de sanctions et de représailles militaires tous ceux qui émettent des doutes sur la Shoah et le 11 septembre » — Président Ahmadinejad

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

LE GOUVERNEMENT CANADIEN SAIT COMMENT PLAIRE À SON MAÎTRE ET SE PORTE VOLONTAIRE POUR RAYER L’IRAN DE LA CARTE ADVENANT LE CAS OÙ LES USA REFUSERAIENT DE LE FAIRE

Mise à jour 8 septembre 2012:

VIDEO – Zionist Occupied Canada Serves Israel: Severs all Ties With Iran

Iran: By suspending ties, Canada has sacrificed its national interests for Israel’s sake: Canada has sacrificed its national interests for the sake of Israel by suspending diplomatic ties with Iran, a government…

Canada closes Iranian embassy, suspends diplomatic ties

Canada has closed its embassy in Tehran, listed Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism and expelled all Iranian diplomats from Canada.

21 février 2012:

Et le Canada sera récompensé: le chouchou sera visité en premier, avant Obama, pour bien montrer c’est qui le bon chouchou à son maî-maître.

 http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSTkbApuveykSLvsY1v1bXuHRoS2hhEJgzv2vGJxqSEYxh5RiuNDtqEhvW4

Netanyahu to Meet Harper Before Obama

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is expected to make a stopover in Ottawa to meet with Prime Minister Harper before heading to Washington.
(…)
Of key concern are tensions between Jerusalem and Washington over how to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The Obama administration insists sanctions will succeed, while Netanyahu last week said sanctions are « not working. »
(…)
The Prime Minister’s early March visit follows a high-profile Middle East tour by key Harper cabinet ministers in late January. Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty met with top Israeli financial, trade and defense officials during the tour.
The upcoming Ottawa visit by Netanyahu is widely seen as a public show of thanks for the strong support Harper’s government has shown for the Jewish state during a time when the US – long Israel’s strongest ally – is increasingly seen in Jerusalem as unreliable.
Baird in particular spoke positively of Netanyahu’s leadership and Israel’s position vis-a-vis negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, going so far as to tell officials in Ramallah that their unilateral bid for statehood at the United Nations was « profoundly wrong. »
He also spoke enthusiastically of his support for Israel at the recent Herzliya conference, saying, « Canada does not stand behind Israel; Canada stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel. »
Baird told Israeli reporters during his visit, “whether it is rockets raining down on Israeli schools, or the constant barrage of rhetorical demonization, double standards and delegitimization, Israel is under attack.”Harper takes cautious tone over Israeli stance on Iran
Israel’s Netanyahu warns against ‘trap’ of talks; wants all options on tableNetanyahu in Canada: Iran a Grave ThreatCanada grovels before mighty Israel

VIDEO – Israel and US clash over Iran attack

Israel to U.S.: Disagreement over attack on nuclear sites serves Iranian interests
US aide tells Israel sanctions on Iran need time

VIDEO – Iran – Derniers préparatifs avant de futures frappes Israéliennes (Ils préparent déjà la couverture médiatique de la FUTURE guerre d’Israël contre l’Iran et le Hezbollah!)

U.S., Britain urge Israel not to attack Iran

Dennis Ross to Haaretz: Sanctions against Iran are working (Même le juif sioniste Ross, autrefois responsable du Moyen-Orient pour l’admin Obama, est d’accord pour dire qu’on a pas besoin de partir en guerre.)

Israel ‘Will Make Own Decision’ on Attacking Iran

‘If Israel bombs Iran, Arab states will support Tehran’

U.S. assessment: Israel strike on Iran would be ‘highly complex’

Israel as Collateral Damage (in a War With Iran) Chossudovksy believes Iran would ultimately lose a war with the US, despite inflicting massive damage on civilians and US military installations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, as well as destroying Israel as a major Middle East power.

Citizenship and Immigration MP Kenney halts funding to Palestine House

Canada Is Israeli Occupied Territory: Canada Competes With The US For Being The Biggest Israel Butt Kissers! 

Netanyahu in Canada: Iran a Grave Threat

Canada sanctions Syria, McCain calls for air strikes: John Baird, Canada’s Foreign Minister, closes embassy, says « Assad must go »; McCain says US should lead int’l strikes.

Appetizers on the Eve of the AIPAC Orgy

Will Bibi Break Obama?

Netanyahu expected to press Obama to threaten Iran with military action

Netanyahu faces a tough decision should Obama not give him a green light on Iran

VIDEO – Obama “hasn’t given an inch” to Israel on Lieberman’s “red line”

‘Obama facing massive pressure from Israel’s supporters’
New York Times reports that Netanyahu’s visit to Washington sees campaign being mounted by Israel’s US supporters with public pressure being put on president over his stance on Iran

U.S. Talking Tougher About Iran as Netanyahu Visit Approaches

Israel delivers ultimatum to Barack Obama on Iran’s nuclear plans

Israeli officials disappointed with Obama meeting

I don’t trust Obama Op-ed: We can’t count on US president to protect Israel at the expense of his personal interests

Republican candidates addressing AIPAC’s policy conference focused their addresses on what they said were the Obama administration’s failures to head off a nuclear Iran.

Obama: ‘Premature’ strike on Iran would have consequences for U.S.

Netanyahu in AIPAC speech: Israel cannot afford to wait much longer on Iran

By conjuring the Holocaust, Netanyahu brought Israel closer to war with Iran

Debunking Anti-Iran Propaganda: The Myth of the « New Holocaust »

Stand Up Barack

DON’T LET ISRAEL DRAG AMERICA INTO A WAR AGAINST IRAN

The wars against
Iraq and Afghanistan
are disasters. Can
you imagine Iran?

If the Obama administration genuinely wanted to prevent a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities that could potentially lead to WWIII, it would implement three measures:
First, all economic sanctions levied against Iran under Obama’s 2012 National Defense Authorization Act would be withdrawn. As Rep. Ron Paul (RTexas) correctly said on Dec. 21, 2009: “Sanctions are not diplomacy.
They are a precursor to war.”
Second, U.S. officials would, without delay, schedule face-to-face meetings with their Iranian counterparts.
After all, during the Cold War when the Soviet Union possessed thousands of nuclear warheads, previous administrations still sat down at the table with them. Iran doesn’t have a single nuke. Why will not Obama speak with them?
Or, as Paul remarked during an Aug. 11, 2011 GOP debate: “At least our leaders and Reagan talked to the Soviets.What is so terribly bad about that? Countries you put sanctions on, you are more likely to fight them.” Truer words could not be spoken.
Third, on Feb. 20 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s former chief of staff, Naftali Bennett, stated that an Israeli military strike is “imminent.” If Obama wanted to avoid a catastrophic unilateral attack by Israel, he could send a clear and definitive message by signing an executive order that would immediately cut off all financial aid to Israel. Without such funding, not only would Netanyahu’s murderous military receive no further blood money, but every other nation around the globe could see the White House’s intent: The United States will no longer be Israel’s patsy.
Didn’t American voters elect Barack Obama so that the policies of the Bush-Cheney regime would no longer be implemented?
Not once has Obama publicly denounced Israel’s “imminent” plans towage a preemptive strike. Rather, the only element Obama and Netanyahu officials seem to be haggling over is the timeframe. Even this point is crucial because last year, the U.S.-NATO led invasion against Muammar Qadaffi’s Libya occurred on March 19—the Jewish festival of Purim. President George W. Bush’s “shock and awe” attack on Iraq in 2003 also began on Purim.
Although some maintain hope Obama will keep the U.S. out of yet another military entanglement, his track record suggests otherwise. During a Feb. 22 interview, Gregg Kalina, author of a soon-to-be-released book on NASA’s Apollo Program, told this writer: “Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize on Oct. 9, 2009, but nothing he’s done since becoming president has shown he deserved such an award. He renewed the [USA] Patriot Act, kept [the prison at] Gitmo open, authorized U.S. involvement in the Libyan invasion and initially escalated troops in Afghanistan. He renewed President Bush’s warrantless wiretapping policy. And no other president has used drone attacks more frequently than him. The number of innocent Afghan people killed by these drones is appalling. On top of that, after one of our military’s droneswas downed in Iran, Obama had the audacity to demand its return.”
Kalina continued: “It’s peculiar that the U.S. is currently sending decommissioned naval ships into the Persian Gulf. It’s the same technique that started past wars. . . . It sounds like we’re sending those ships through the Strait of Hormuz to spark a conflict.” If false-flag attacks such as those on the USS Liberty and 9-11 are any indicator, Kalina feels, this country is the victim of manipulation.
“Through AIPAC and the central bankers, we’re doing whatever Israel tells us to do,” he said. “U.S. military might is being used as a big stick to wipe out countries in the Middle East that Israel wants wiped out. It’s their domino theory: Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Libya, with Iran and Syria next.”
Neo-conservatives and other like-minded Israeli lackeys argue, “What about Iranian Prime Minister Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s threat to wipe Israel off the map?”
This statement is especially pertinent because, as has been reported in this newspaper, Ahmadinejad’s words were deliberately misrepresented. What Ahmadinejad actually said, properly translated, was, “This regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.”
In this light, why doesn’t Obama hold a press conference and correct the record once and for all? As soon as this inflammatory rhetoric has been defanged, Israel’s role as a “hapless victim”—not tomention any allusions to the “holocaust”—will be erased.
Likewise, why doesn’t Obama or White House spokesman Jay Carney issue a press release asking one simple question: How many nations has Iran invaded in the past 60 years, and howmany preemptive attacks has Israel engaged in? Regrettably, Obama and his Cabinet remain silent on these points, thereby allowing the Israeli propagandamachine to keep brainwashing unwitting citizens.
For his part, Kalina feels the American public is being conned with smoke and mirrors.
“Supposedly, Obama is fighting with Netanyahu, but I think it’s all a show, a fake, a 100 percent snowjob,” he said. “Obama puffs his chest out, but then in the backroom he and Netanyahu laugh about it. Then Obama acquiesces.
That’s theway this game is played. Everybody knows Israel is running the whole thing.”
Taking one step further, Kalina added: “Look at the cronies who brought Obama up. He was burped and raised by all the Jews in Chicago. They’re the ones who put himin power. This guy had no credentials. Who was backing him?”
Indeed, other than a no-show stint in politics and a brief tenure in academia, Obama has never held a real job in his entire life. He’s never run a business, he’s never been in the military, he’s never had executive experience, and he’s never met a payroll.
Kalina interjected: “How can we explain Obama’s meteoric rise against Hillary Clinton in 2008 when the odds against him winning were 200-1? Does anyone really think a black man with absolutely no experience is going to change a banking system and war machine that has been intact for decades? It’s absurd. Plus, if Obama ever did try to defy the powers that be, they’d simply pull out the 1963 Zapruder film.”
Pursuing this line of reasoning even further, Kalina noted, “Gen. Smedley Butler warned the world about Wall Street bankers that profit from war.” But still, four of Obama’s top 10 donors in 2008 were JPMorganChase, Citigroup, GE, with the No. 1 contributor being Goldman Sachs.
On Feb. 23, Arab news agency Al Jazeera reported: “Obama won the presidency thanks in no small part to the investment firm Goldman Sachs—his biggest backer of the 2008 campaign. Despite tough talk about reining in the excesses of bankers, Obama’s government is pepperedwith former finance industry executives or figures close to Wall Street.”
Regardless of his charade of antagonism against these high-level financiers—the 1 percenters—Obama persists in collecting huge sums of money from the country’s top bankers. Nothing in life is free, and if Obama keeps pocketing Wall Street money, it’s naïve to believe he won’t also be forced to do its bidding.
‘A threat to Israel is a threat to Canada’: Peter MacKay to Jewish commander Jun 19, 2012

Canada’s defense minister’s message to Canadian military – We’re ready to send you to die for Israel

 

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

FALSE FLAG EN INDE: L’ANCIEN CHEF DE L’UNITÉ ANTI-BEN LADEN À LA CIA POINTE DU DOIGT ISRAEL ET L’ARABIE SAOUDITE

Le juge Napolitano vient de perdre son émission sur les ondes de Fox News.
FIRED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH
• Popular talk show host pink-slipped for openly discussing taboo subjects
By Pat Shannan
Was a popular television talk show host and former New Jersey judge kicked off Fox News because he went too far in disclosing facts about FBI setups and warmongering intrigues on the part of the U.S. establishment—key issues that AMERICAN FREE PRESS has been covering since its founding in 2001?
In recent days, former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano had been drifting dangerously close to the exit doors by providing the American people with simply too much truth. The first week of February he was abruptly canceled from the airwaves due to low ratings, Fox executives claimed.
Napolitano repeatedly opened his show with the question, “Can the federal government take credit for solving a plot of its own creation?”
Focusing on FBI claims that since 9-11 it has foiled multiple alleged terrorist plots to kill Americans, Napolitano pointed out that while there were some 20 such incidents, three were interrupted by private citizens who observed suspicious activity. But the remaining 17 that were “solved” by the feds all had a common and reprehensible thread: They were planned, plotted, controlled and carried out by the federal government itself.
Not unlike the 1993 first attack on the World Trade Center, the FBI had agents or informants befriend young Muslim men by luring them into  cooperation with encouragement about being “like-minded” and anti-American. Then, of course, they were arrested before any damage could be done—followed by great hoopla the next day.
Napolitano also tackled Israel’s prime role in promoting a United States war against Iran, and this may have been the final straw for those signing his paycheck. The judge’s final guest and source of information was Michael Scheuer, the former chief of the CIA’s Osama bin Laden-watching unit.
While Scheuer accepts the U.S. government claim that bin Laden was the architect of 9-11, a point many researchers reject, he is a courageous critic of Israel and its U.S. lobby and, as Napolitano’s guest, pointed out that a war against Iran benefits Israel and Saudi Arabia but not the United States.
———-
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano examines the concept the government hates and fears the most: Freedom.
The United States of America was born out of a bloody revolt against tyranny. Yet almost from its inception, the government here has suppressed liberty.
In his sixth book on the Constitution and human freedom, Napolitano asks: Where does freedom come from? How can government in America exercise power that the people have not given to it? What forces have collaborated to destroy personal freedom?
In this back-to-basics on freedom, Napolitano addresses hard questions: Do we still have a Constitution? What are the limits to government in a free society? Why does the government attack, rather than defend, our rights? If our rights are inalienable, how can the government take them away? Do we really own any private property?
The judge gives a sweeping treatment of rights and all the philosophical, religious and ideological principles that underscore the concept of human freedom.
Hardcover, 283 pages, #361. Was $27. NOW JUST $22.95 WITH THE 15% DISCOUNT. Add $4 S&H; inside the U.S. Order from AFP, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Call toll free at 1-888-699-6397 to charge. Order here.
——
Pat Shannan is a contributing editor of American Free Press. He is also the author of several videos and books including One in a Million: An IRS Travesty, I Rode With Tupper and Everything They* Ever Told Me Was a Lie. All are available from FIRST AMENDMENT BOOKS. Call 1-888-699-6397 toll free to charge.


That could mean pressing into service the top tier of American firepower — warplanes, warships, special operations forces and possibly airborne infantry — with unpredictable outcomes in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

« Israel can commence a war with Iran, but it may well take U.S. involvement to conclude it, » says Karim Sadjadpour, a Middle East specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.(…)

Kristol instructs “American friends of Israel” to persuade Obama “to stand arm in arm” with Israel on Iran

Voir aussi:

Opérations Sous Faux Pavillon Du Mossad Et Victimologie Juive Sioniste En Prélude A Une Attaque Contre L’Iran

‘Israel warned India of possible terror plot’

Those “Iranian” Bombings

Indian Investigators do not Suspect Iran in Israel Embassy Blast

Israeli Embassy Attack — A false flag designed to derail India’s long-term partnership with Iran?

How the media spin Mossad’s dirty tricks campaign

Report: Mossad chief visited New Delhi days before attack on Israeli officials

Hezbollah denies responsibility for attempted terror attacks against Israeli targets

Israeli Officials Blame Iran for Recent Bombings, Despite Lack of Evidence

US cities on ‘high alert’ for terror attack by Iranian agents

False flag: Mossad posed as US intelligence, recruited Islamic terrorists

Sur ce blog:


L’ancien responsable de l’Unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA estime que l’Islam radical est une menace imaginaire.

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment