Le printemps arabe: « une incroyable opportunité pour Israël », selon l’ancien directeur du Mossad Meir Dagan et le Maj. Gen. et criminel de guerre Yoav Galant

Israel must use the ‘opportunity’ provided by the Arab Spring, says former IDF chief-designate 

Maj. Gen. Yoav Galant remains quiet about his failed appointment as IDF chief and says seven good years of Israel’s security are about to end.

Maj. Gen. (ret. ) Yoav Galant spoke about his fears for Israel’s security, and about how the country should « market » itself, at conference hosted by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy in Washington on Thursday.

On his failed appointment as the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff, Galant has preferred to keep silent, stating only that « one day the full scope of the story will be revealed. » But on Friday, as the speaker at the fifth annual Zeev Schiff Memorial Lecture on Middle East Security, he provided his perspective on events shaking the region, and how Israel should deal with them.

« I believe the Israel Defense Forces is doing a good job », Galant said. « The most prominent and difficult question is how to keep Israel just, and how to market it. I believe we have an opportunity now – after the world was watching [Syrian President Bashar] Assad killing more civilian Arabs than Israel killed in 60 years – we have to use this opportunity. And we need to be more humble, more solid, to pay more respect to other people, to young generations, because good ideas arise from these generations. »

He also called Assad the last Alawite ruler of Syria, though Galant did not want to predict how long Assad could hold onto power.

In the case of Syria, Galant said, time is not on Israel’s side. « It’s not working for us in Syria, because the vacuum on the opposition side is going to be filled with radical Muslims, with Al-Qaida involved, the Muslim Brotherhood. In two years, we’ll have very extremist people on the other side. »

Seven good years of Israel’s security are about to end, Galant claimed, as the changes in the Middle East have complicated Israel’s situation.

Demographic trends are also undermining the impact of the IDF, he said. Within 10 years, Galant said, there will be 8 million Jews and 8 million non-Jews west of the Jordan, and later on, Jews will be the minority in this area.

He said that the Sinai Bedouin population on Israel’s southern border is becoming an outlaw group, marginalized by the central government, but he stressed that this is an internal, domestic issue for Egypt to solve.

Asked what, in his opinion, are minimal defensible borders in the West Bank and how to deal with the settlements, Galant ducked the question.

He stressed that improving the situation for the Palestinians is in Israel’s interest. « If the situation will be better on the Palestinian side, we’ll get sooner to the solution. »

Former Mossad Chief: Arab Spring ‘Incredible Opportunity for Israel »

Published: June 20th, 2012
Latest update: June 21st, 2012

Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan, speaking at the 2012 Presidential Conference in Jerusalem, expressed cautious optimism about the potential outcomes of the Arab Spring, saying that “we are in a very unique position that has never been seen before.”

Dagan was part of a panel discussing the Arab Spring, steps that regional actors could take to help ensure a peaceful transition to democracy, and the impact of these revolutions on Israel. The panel also featured, among others, former IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, and former senior Presidential adviser Dennis Ross.

Dagan, who has maintained a high profile since his tenure as Mossad chief ended, said that “the radicals in the Arab League are no longer there and a range of mutual interests that require regional cooperation provide an incredible opportunity for fostering peaceful relations.” Still, he acknowledged that the Arab Spring is far from over: “I am worried about Islamist parties with a radical agenda that will take power. It will present a big problem for us.”

Referring to the recent Presidential election in Egypt and claims that the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohammed Morsi is slated for victory, he said that “in Egypt it was never important which way the votes go but who counts them.”

Former IDF chief Ashkenazi also weighed in on the monumental changes taking place in the Arab world, saying that “the storm sweeping the Arab world is of tectonic proportions. It happens once every 100 years and cannot be overestimated. This is not just a coup. I don’t know anyone in the defense establishment that predicted what happened there.” He said it was critical that Israel preserve open lines of communication with the Egyptian army: “It is practically the only channel…with Turkey as well.”

Discussing the importance of Israel maintaining its relative military superiority, Ashkenazi offered his solution to the controversial issue of national/military service for all Israeli citizens: “It has long been my belief that not everyone must be drafted. We should go by a principle of service for all, not enlistment for all.

“The IDF should get first pick,” he continued. “Whoever is not selected by the IDF will go to the Fire Services, Magen David Adom or other services…As for the haredim, it’s very important they join the army and then enter the work force. The Torah greats will decide who goes to yeshivot and the rest will join the army.”

Dennis Ross, talking about the role that the U.S. should play in the Arab Spring, said “we in the West are not the authors of this story, so we won’t be the ones to write it. But if we are asked for help, we should offer it, with ground rules – respect religion, minorities and free speech – if they don’t follow these rules they shouldn’t be entitled to help.”

The Presidential Conference will wrap up tomorrow, after hearing from the likes of Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Chairman of the Jewish Agency Natan Sharansky, Rabbi Michael Melchior, and journalist Caroline Glick.

Mais la Jordanie ne serait pas touchée selon lui. Comment peut-il savoir cela?

Dagan predicts Arab Spring won’t reach Jordan

Making Sense of a Rightwing Israeli Institute’s Ambivalent View of Arab Democracy

Israel lobby celebrates Treasury’s successful use of “financial tools” to support Arab Spring

Pourquoi Israël se réjouit-il de l’arrivée de partis islamiques au pouvoir? (en Égypte)

 

 

Pourquoi Israel soutient des rebelles jihadistes musulmans? une telle instabilité ne met-elle pas en danger l’existence d’Israel demande la journaliste à BHL. Non, répond-il! (Après une longue déclaration de son attachement inconditionnel à Israel) « C’est bon pour Israël! »

Attends, j’ai pas saisi en quoi c’est bon pour Israel.

Éjecter Assad et Khadafi c’étaient déjà en soi des objectifs sionistes, mais fallait-il à tout prix fomenter une révolution dans tout le pays avec l’aide de sectateurs musulmans terroristes pour un simple assassinat politique? Il semble qu’il manque encore un élément de réponse pour expliquer pourquoi Israel soutiendrait des djihadistes au lieu de tout simplement éliminer Assad physiquement (ce qui ne devrait pas être si difficile pour le Mossad et ses armées de Sayanim).

Piper explique le principe du « sionisme catastrophe » ou « sionisme de guerre », selon lequel Israel doit toujours être sur un pied de guerre avec au moins un ennemi, si c’est pas sur plusieurs fronts, pour survivre. Israel carbure au conflit, à la crise, à la guerre perpétuelle. Sans la guerre Israel ne se voit plus de raison d’être, éclate de l’intérieur et tombe de lui-même. Il doit donc se faire plein d’ennemis, réels ou pas, c’est pas ça l’essentiel.  L’essentiel c’est la provocation réussie qui  victimisation, qui renfloue sans cesse leur capital de sympathie.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/catastrophic_zionism_257.html

While most rational people would assume that Israel would prefer to have neighboring states that are stable, successful participants in the region, this is not necessarily the case.

In fact, a carefully crafted “think piece” entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s,” featured in the February 1982 edition of the World Zionist Organization’s Jerusalem-based publication Kivunim: A Journal for Judaism and Zionism, candidly put forth an Israeli strategy to wreak havoc in the Arab world, dividing the Arab states from within. The author was Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist with close ties to Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

The program—which amounted to “balkanizing” the various Arab republics, splitting them into religious enclaves in which, for example, Shiite Muslims or otherwise Sunni Muslims would predominate—was an agenda that Israeli dissident Israel Shahak said, quite simply, was designed “to make an imperial Israel into a world power,” by disrupting the Arab states and thereby setting the stage for Israeli dominance in the Mideast.

The formula was founded on the idea of creating chaos among Israel’s Arab neighbors, hardly a policy any decent, well-meaning neighbor could be credited for fostering. In fact, the current-day political and religious divisions and devastation in Iraq—the consequence of the American invasion of Iraq demanded by the pro-Israel lobby in Washington—mirrors precisely what the Zionist position paper laid forth as the ideal state of affairs for Iraq, from an Israeli point of view, that is.

But where does Egypt fit into all of this? Reflecting on the Zionist strategy paper, Ralph Schoenman—an eminent American Jewish critic of Zionism—writing in 1988 in his book, The Hidden History of Zionism, pointedly noted the paper’s intent of “double-crossing Mubarak” and emphasized that the Yinon paper hoped for “the downfall and dissolution of Egypt,” despite the 1979 Camp David peace agreement.

This is geopolitics at its best—or worst—and demonstrates the kind of gambles Israel has historically been willing to take.

After all, Israel helped subsidize and nurture the fledgling Hamas faction within the Palestinian statehood movement, as a means to counter and undermine the secular Fatah faction led by senior Palestinian statesman Yassir Arafat. But Hamas got out of control, grew in popularity, and now stands as one of Israel’s chief rivals.

Such gamesmanship by Israel is part of a philosophy known as “catastrophic Zionism,” a term used almost exclusively by Israeli and Jewish writers.

The theme of “catastrophic Zionism,” sometimes called “war Zionism,” suggests that Israel—as a state— relies on crisis and the potential of war with its neighbors as a foundation of its very existence. This has actually been the belief of many hard-line “right wing” elements going back to the earliest days of Israel.

In short, there are many Zionists who believe such crisis is vital—fundamental—to Israel’s survival. And for this reason, the believers in “catastrophic Zionism” will never lend their support to any policy, domestic or international, that could lead to a final solution of the conflict between Israel and its Arab and Muslim neighbors.


In actual fact, this notion—that peace could be dangerous to the survival of Israel—is a governing concept in the minds of many Israelis and their supporters worldwide.


Is Israel the Winner of the Arab Spring?

by Gabriel M. Scheinmann

Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs

Israelis understandably feel imperiled by the misnamed “Arab Spring.” Their country’s three-decade peace treaty with Egypt is under assault, its strategic alliance with Turkey has dissolved, and its closest regional ally, Jordan, is withering from domestic protests.

The breakdown in political authority has flooded Israel’s borders with a slew of dangerous weapons, from Libyan missiles in Gaza to Syrian Scuds in southern Lebanon. Meanwhile, the Iranian nuclear program progresses unabated. Individually, each of these developments is cause for great concern; taken together, Israelis see the walls closing in.

Although the initial flickers of liberalism have been subsumed by the Islamist bonfire, the so-called “Arab Spring” has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other. While Arab capitals burn, Jerusalem has calmly and carefully steeled itself against the possible immediate deleterious effects, building fences along its Egyptian and Jordanian borders and accelerating the deployment of its Iron Dome anti-missile system. Whereas Arab states remain mired in internal political, economic, and military turmoil, Israel hums along, its economy intact – tourism is at an all-time high – its military untested, and its government united.

For three decades, Mubarak’s Egypt was the anchor of Israel’s regional security. Since his ouster, the lawless Sinai has been the source of rocket attacks, Egypt has canceled its gas contract with Israel, Israel’s Cairo embassy staff barely survived an attempted mob lynching and the Muslim Brotherhood has issued disquieting verbal volleys against the peace treaty.

As these troubling developments suggest, the capacity of the Egyptian state has also fundamentally declined. The Egyptian economy is in dire straits: foreign reserves have dropped 60 percent, foreign direct investment has fallen by 90 percent, and this year’s budget deficit is 10.4 percent of GDP – America’s is 7.6 percent – and trending upwards. Furthermore, Egypt’s military regime and the Muslim Brotherhood are focused inward on reestablishing order and consolidating political control. Any warlike move by an Islamist-led Egypt would trigger the elimination of the American military aid that currently funds nearly 40 percent of Egypt’s defense budget. The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.

Israel’s concerns about a volatile Syria also belie the advantages reaped by a damaged Syria. Concerned about the potential transfer of Syrian Scuds or chemical weapons to Hezbollah, Israel is apprehensive of both a last ditch attempt by Assad to embroil it in war or by the possible ascent of another Islamist regime.

However, irrespective of Assad’s ability to cling to power, post-uprising Syria will also be a shell of its former self. Like Egypt, its economy is in tatters, having been hit hard by Western sanctions on its oil industry, which accounts for 30 percent of its budget. Its’ army has suffered large defections and losses at the hands of the rebels and its’ patron, Iran, has invested massively in propping up its sole regional ally. Even Hezbollah, aware of its current tenuous position in the Lebanese powder keg, finds itself increasingly isolated, having sided with Assad. Israel’s northern border has never been quieter.

Even in Gaza, where Hamas is ensconced, Israel’s successful deployment of the game-changing Iron Dome missile defense system has revolutionized the security situation, resulting in no Israeli casualties due to rocket fire thus far this year. Hamas abandoned its cozy headquarters in Damascus, fearful of aligning itself with the heretical Alawite sect against its Sunni Muslim brothers, and continues the political tug-of-war with Fatah in the West Bank. Even beyond Israel’s immediate borders, the “Arab Spring” has uncorked ethno-religious conflicts. PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) attacks on Turkish military targets have spiked, fighting continues between Arab, African, and Berber tribesmen in Libya, and two new independent states have been declared, the Tuareg state of Azawad in northwestern Mali and South Sudan, marking the first loss of “Arab” sovereignty in 45 years.

Even as it rightly plans for the changes wrought by the “Arab Spring,” Israel should also recognize that as the Middle East convulses, it is more likely to be left alone. As Alawites battle Arab Sunnis and Kurds in Syria, as Kurds target Turks in Turkey, as the Imazighen fight Arabs in Libya, as the Army contends with Islamists in Egypt, and as Sunnis and Christians confront Shiites in Lebanon, people don’t have the time, energy, or resources to fight the Jews in Israel. The more the region tears itself apart, the more Israel floats to the top, unscathed economically, militarily, or diplomatically. While an Islamist ascent is undesirable, the intervening disorder only makes Israel stronger.

 

 

JINSA: Arab Spring disorder makes Israel stronger

­By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
July 16, 2012

In a July 11 article on the JINSA website, visiting fellow Gabriel M. Scheinmann confirms what readers of The Passionate Attachment have known for some time:

Although the initial flickers of liberalism have been subsumed by the Islamist bonfire, the so-called “Arab Spring” has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other. While Arab capitals burn, Jerusalem has calmly and carefully steeled itself against the possible immediate deleterious effects, building fences along its Egyptian and Jordanian borders and accelerating the deployment of its Iron Dome anti-missile system. Whereas Arab states remain mired in internal political, economic, and military turmoil, Israel hums along, its economy intact – tourism is at an all-time high – its military untested, and its government united.

For three decades, Mubarak’s Egypt was the anchor of Israel’s regional security. Since his ouster, the lawless Sinai has been the source of rocket attacks, Egypt has canceled its gas contract with Israel, Israel’s Cairo embassy staff barely survived an attempted mob lynching and the Muslim Brotherhood has issued disquieting verbal volleys against the peace treaty.

As these troubling developments suggest, the capacity of the Egyptian state has also fundamentally declined. The Egyptian economy is in dire straits: foreign reserves have dropped 60 percent, foreign direct investment has fallen by 90 percent, and this year’s budget deficit is 10.4 percent of GDP – America’s is 7.6 percent – and trending upwards. Furthermore, Egypt’s military regime and the Muslim Brotherhood are focused inward on reestablishing order and consolidating political control. Any warlike move by an Islamist-led Egypt would trigger the elimination of the American military aid that currently funds nearly 40 percent of Egypt’s defense budget. The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.

Israel’s concerns about a volatile Syria also belie the advantages reaped by a damaged Syria. Concerned about the potential transfer of Syrian Scuds or chemical weapons to Hezbollah, Israel is apprehensive of both a last ditch attempt by Assad to embroil it in war or by the possible ascent of another Islamist regime.

However, irrespective of Assad’s ability to cling to power, post-uprising Syria will also be a shell of its former self. Like Egypt, its economy is in tatters, having been hit hard by Western sanctions on its oil industry, which accounts for 30 percent of its budget. Its’ army has suffered large defections and losses at the hands of the rebels and its’ patron, Iran, has invested massively in propping up its sole regional ally. Even Hezbollah, aware of its current tenuous position in the Lebanese powder keg, finds itself increasingly isolated, having sided with Assad. Israel’s northern border has never been quieter.

Even in Gaza, where Hamas is ensconced, Israel’s successful deployment of the game-changing Iron Dome missile defense system has revolutionized the security situation, resulting in no Israeli casualties due to rocket fire thus far this year. Hamas abandoned its cozy headquarters in Damascus, fearful of aligning itself with the heretical Alawite sect against its Sunni Muslim brothers, and continues the political tug-of-war with Fatah in the West Bank. Even beyond Israel’s immediate borders, the “Arab Spring” has uncorked ethno-religious conflicts. PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) attacks on Turkish military targets have spiked, fighting continues between Arab, African, and Berber tribesmen in Libya, and two new independent states have been declared, the Tuareg state of Azawad in northwestern Mali and South Sudan, marking the first loss of “Arab” sovereignty in 45 years.

Even as it rightly plans for the changes wrought by the “Arab Spring,” Israel should also recognize that as the Middle East convulses, it is more likely to be left alone. As Alawites battle Arab Sunnis and Kurds in Syria, as Kurds target Turks in Turkey, as the Imazighen fight Arabs in Libya, as the Army contends with Islamists in Egypt, and as Sunnis and Christians confront Shiites in Lebanon, people don’t have the time, energy, or resources to fight the Jews in Israel. The more the region tears itself apart, the more Israel floats to the top, unscathed economically, militarily, or diplomatically. While an Islamist ascent is undesirable, the intervening disorder only makes Israel stronger.

It appears that Carl Gershman, Peter Ackerman, Jared Cohen, et al. knew what they were doing after all when they helped unleash the supposedly Israel-threatening Arab democratic wave. As no doubt did Israeli President Shimon Peres when during an April 2011 visit to Washington he urged aid to the “the awakening of the Arab world.”

 


Syria’s Destruction to Create a Greater Israel: The Ugly Truth

 

Israel is the only real winner of the so-called ‘Arab Spring’

with 2 comments
By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
August 18, 2012

Award-winning Iranian journalist Kourosh Ziabari recently interviewed me about the ongoing destabilization of the Middle East and North Africa commonly referred to as the Arab Spring.

KZ: In a recent article in the Washington Post, Charles Krauthammer wrote that the SCAF hastily dissolved the Egyptian parliament because the majority of members of parliament elected in the post-Mubarak elections were Islamists. Does Mohammad Morsi’s acceptance of the military council’s decision denote that he might be inclined toward the West? The U.S. Secretary of State Clinton has just paid a visit to Egypt and met with President Morsi. Are these signs indicative of the fact that Morsi has a pro-Western attitude and may betray the Egyptian Revolution?

MÓC: First of all, I don’t believe that there was a genuine revolution in Egypt in the first place. Like the “colour revolutions” in Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine and elsewhere, the so-called “Arab Spring” was orchestrated by the regime change specialists at the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict and the wider network of groups engaged in what is euphemistically called “democracy promotion.” While the mainstream media cannot openly admit this, they have given some strong hints. For example, a New York Times report in April 2011, aptly entitled “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” acknowledged that “as American officials and others look back at the uprisings of the Arab Spring, they are seeing that the United States’ democracy-building campaigns played a bigger role in fomenting protests than was previously known, with key leaders of the movements having been trained by the Americans in campaigning, organizing through new media tools and monitoring elections.” Unless we are to believe that these “democracy-building campaigns” were not intended to undermine authoritarian regimes like Mubarak’s, then there’s no “revolution” for the American-educated Morsi to betray. Interestingly, it appears that it was Krauthammer, a Guardian of Zion awardee, who was the first to use the term “Arab Spring.” In the same 2005 piece, he presciently wrote, “The democracy project is, of course, just beginning.”

KZ: What will be, in your view, the attitude of the new government in Egypt toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Prior to the elections, the Israelis were extremely worried that an Islamist president might revoke the Camp David Accords. However, Morsi hasn’t decided to do so. Will the new government in Egypt support the Palestinian resistance front?

MÓC: One has to distinguish between what Israeli officials say publicly and what they think privately. If Tel Aviv was genuinely worried about an Islamist government revoking the Camp David Accords, then why has its American lobby been so supportive of a democratic transition to civilian rule in Cairo, knowing full well that this would increase the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood? A recent article featured on the website of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) gives a clearer insight into Israeli strategic thinking. Entitled “Is Israel the Winner of the Arab Spring?” the piece concludes that “the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other.” As the JINSA fellow astutely observes, “The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.”

Read the rest of this entry »

 

‘Prisoner of Zion’ Promoting Arab Democracy @Google in 2010

 

~~~~S Y R I E~~~~

 

Comme BHL, Israël demande une « intervention massive » en Syrie.

Pour BHL, on s’en serait douté: « une intervention en Syrie est inévitable » …

Quelles leçons faut-il tirer des fantasmes guerriers de Bernard Henry Lévy (BHL) ?

Le sayan BHL ne sait pas écrire, mais son officier traitant sait compter…

http://fr.sott.net/image/image/s5/104583/full/le_serment_de_tobrouk_bhl.jpg

Syrie: « une intervention massive » (Israël)

(AFP) Le vice-ministre israélien des Affaires étrangères, Danny Ayalon, a estimé aujourd’hui à Paris que la communauté internationale devait préparer « une intervention massive » en Syrie, pour éviter « une extension du conflit au Liban et en Irak ». « Plus on attend, plus il y aura de chaos et de victimes. Il n’y a pas grand chose qu’Israël puisse faire, c’est au peuple syrien, à l’Occident et à la Russie de trouver une solution pour arrêter les massacres », a dit à quelques journalistes Danny Ayalon, lors d’une visite en France. 

« La solution la plus efficace serait une intervention massive de la communauté internationale, sur le modèle de ce qui s’est passé en Bosnie », a-t-il poursuivi, évoquant le déploiement d’une force armée d’interposition. « Il est nécessaire d’y associer tous les pays concernés, y compris et surtout la Russie. Il faudra certainement trouver une solution pour (le président) Bachar el-Assad et sa famille », a souligné Ayalon. 

« Si rien ne se passe, il y a un grand risque d’une extension du conflit au Liban et en Irak, deux pays qui partagent de nombreuses similitudes avec la Syrie », a mis en garde le ministre, qui devait s’entretenir dans la journée avec le chef de la diplomatie française Laurent Fabius. Le président israélien Shimon Peres avait déclaré le 10 juin qu’il souhaitait la victoire des rebelles en Syrie. Israël est formellement en état de guerre avec la Syrie, son voisin au nord, mais la frontière entre les deux pays n’a connu aucun incident notable depuis la fin de la guerre israélo-arabe en octobre 1973.

La Syrie est en proie depuis mars 2011 à une révolte sans précédent contre le régime de Bachar el-Assad. Selon l’Observatoire syrien des droits de l’Homme (OSDH), la répression et les combats entre armée et rebelles ont déjà fait plus de 15.000 morts, en majorité des civils.

—-

Pour aller plus loin :

- Les rebelles syriens et l’AIPAC

- Les rebelles syriens et la CIA

The Yinon Thesis Vindicated: Neocons, Israel, and the Fragmentation of Syria

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels By Maidhc Ó Cathail

WINEP provides forum for Syrian National Council — and cover for Israel

Bill Kristol and the Emergency Committee for Israel – liars, or very forgetful?

America’s interest in Syria is Israel

Israel may use military force ‘to secure’ Syria’s alleged chemical arsenal

Israel’s Peres says he hopes Syrian rebels “will win”

Israel wants airstrikes against Syria: Analyst

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

Military: Syria Chemical Stocks Threaten Israel

Does Israel really fear Jihad terrorism from a post-Assad Syria?

JINSA: Arab Spring disorder makes Israel stronger

La CIA et le Mossad préparent le renversement du gouvernement syrien

Israel Wants The Syrian Government to Fall

US, Israel plan Assad removal to hurt Iran: Analyst

Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: « Break Syria into Pieces » by Michel Chossudovsky

Israel has been planing the destruction of Syria for over 30 years. Israel has been planing the destruction of Syria for over 30 years. I suggest people read Zionist and Israeli Dual National Richard « Mr. PNAC » Pearl’s 1996 paper, « A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing The Realm » he presented to none other that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Or, look 30 years back at an Israeli document entitled, « A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties by Oded Yinon » in which Israel calls for sectarian balkanization of Syria and other neighboring Arabic countries in order to secure the survival of the Zionist regime.

‘We’ll Arm the Syrian Rebels – But Only Those Who Share Our Values’

BBC Finds Crates of Saudi Weapons in Syrian Rebel Base

NATO ready to defend Turkey against Syrian attacks

Turkey controlled by Israel, US pro-Zionist lobby: Analyst

Journalist Almost Assasinated for Exposing Turkey Delivering Weapons to Syrian Rebels

Mitt Romney: arm the Syrian rebels

Assad in rare appearance: Enemy has Israeli weapons

VIDEO – RT . Fabius veut armer les terroristes en Syrie S/T (pas le même vidéo que celui de l’autre jour! même si la nouvelle est quasiment la même)

Syria Rebels Declare Civilian Aircraft Legitimate Targets France Mulls Sending Anti-Aircraft Weapons to Rebel Factions

West Seeks Destruction of Syrian Nation

Hezbollah denounces Syria state channels ban Hezbollah on Thursday condemned the decision taken by Arab satellite operators to suspend the transmission of Syrian state channels.

Dem Chairman says Christians « Want Jews to Die and Convert »

VIDEO – Israel: Sheep Lead to The Slaughter: Ken O’Keefe and Mark Glenn

US and Israel Use Propaganda and Proxy War in Syria to Pave Path Toward Iran

France to give heavy artillery to Syria rebels to ‘smash Assad regime’

AUDIO – Syrie: Fabius intreviewé par El Kabbach

Syrian rebels give airlines ’72-hour warning’ before they plan to seize civilian airports

Exclusive: Who Are The Terrorists? What The Media Wont Tell You Exclusive rebel interviews detailing Saudi Arabia’s Salafi Jihad operations reveal details Uncle Sam doesn’t want you to know and the media won’t tell you.
First hand accounts of rebel operations reveal Saudi Arabia is funding terrorists recruited from Salafi schools who are answering an open call from the Saudi Prince’s anointed Prophet’s to wage Jihad against Syria.

Saudi Arabia Paying Terrorists Up To $3,000/Mo To Jihad Against Syria

Putin Warns: Long Civil War in Syria If Assad Unconstitutionally Ousted

Des armes chimiques en provenance de Libye aux mains des « opposants » syriens ?

Canadian media Supports Foreign Terrorists in Syria

U.S. Senators McCain, Lieberman, Graham urge tougher stand on Syria, Iran At a gathering of political, business leaders in Italy, McCain blasted President Obama, who defeated him in the 2008 presidential election, for recently setting the ‘red line’ for Syria at use of chemical weapons.

Al-Qaeda Leader Strikes Deal With U.S., Saudis To Send 5,000 Jihadists To Syria

US-Saudi Backed Al Qaeda Proxy Cells Now Waging Jihad Against Russia

Syrian minister accuses Mossad of assassinating Syrians

France, western allies prepare response to Syrian use of chemical weapons

BBC Scrubs Video Of US Backed Syria Rebels Committing War Crimes

Pentagon reportedly seeking to avert Israeli strike on Syrian chemical weapon sites

Washington Begins to Plan for Collapse of Syrian Government, pushes Israel not to attack Syria

Syrie : François Hollande, occupez-vous du chômage au lieu de Bachar Al-Assad !

Syrian group with close ties to FSA terrorists openly arms rebels with help of U.S.

SAA finds Israel-made weapons and grenades in FSA hideout.

War crime? Syrian rebels execute POWs (GRAPHIC VIDEO)

VIDEO – I saw rebels beheading men for religion’- Syrian cleric

Assad vows Syria will defeat ‘foreign conspiracy’

Britain and US Plan Syrian “Revolution” From Istanbul

Syrie : les puissances impérialistes (anciennes contre nouvelles) transforment une révolte populaire du monde arabe en guerre inter-impérialiste

Syrian Rebels Claim to Take Over Chemical Weapons

Syrian FM– ‘We believe that the USA is the major player against Syria and the rest are its instruments’

Réseaux d’envoi de combattants Britanniques en Syrie

VIDEO – BHL: Choutzpah d’or!

« L’armée rebelle ? C’est une bande d’étrangers… » par Robert Fisk, excellent reporter, pas un phony comme Bollyn…

Western Troops are inside Syria Report: 200 British SAS Forces « Hunting for WMDs »

BREAKING: British Military Base in Cyprus Used for « Syrian Operation »

Syrian Christians in 2-week blockade by rebel fighters, residents desperate

Loin de s’effondrer, le régime syrien est passé à l’offensive

Why Syria will not Fall: Crushing Defeat of « Free Syrian Army »

Syria conflict: ‘Scores of bodies found’ near Damascus

France: Le président Hollande rencontre l’« opposition » syrienne soutenue par les Etats-Unis

France ready for Syrian intervention without UN

Syrie: Les États-Unis légalisent le financement du terrorisme

VIDÉO : L’Armée Syrienne “Libre” transforme ses prisonniers en kamikazes

Terrorisme d’État – des journalistes occidentaux suivent « al-Qaïda » en Syrie

Syria’s Destruction Will Ensure US and Israeli Strategic Advantage for Iranian Strike

Alain Soral sur l’éventuelle guerre Israël-Iran et les déclarations de Laurent Fabius contre le président syrien

VIDEO – BBC – les rebelles syriens de l’armée de libération syrienne… sont en réalité des tortionnaires

Syrian Military is Winning – Ziad Fadel – Syrian Commentator

AUDIO – Mark Glenn: Press TV News & Analysis–Israel war threat on Syria a planned move to force US to follow and undermine UN

Syria jihadist fighters and mercenaries eye formation of Islamic State

VIDEO – PHOTOS FROM SYRIA ~ WARNING !!! BEYOND GRAPHIC!!!

Jihadists Striving for Autocratic Theocracy Make Up Syrian Rebels

Big Powers Move In On Syria: WW3 Set To Blow?

‘Israel master of puppets in Syria unrest’

Israel Invents Syrian WMD Threat, IDF Commanders Threaten Intervention

‘Assad will use chemical weapons’

‘WMD’ + ‘ethnic cleansings’ = case to bomb Syria? (IRAQ, LIBYA, ALL OVER AGAIN)

Syrian rebels aim to use chemical weapons, blame Damascus – report

Syria forces seize Israel-made arms from rebels

False Flag Alert: US Claims Syria « Moving Nerve Gas Out of Storage »

« Democracy Now » and the « Progressive » Alternative Media: Valued Cheerleaders For Imperialism and War

VIDEO: « Panetta has Blood on his Hands for Supporting Syrian Rebels »

VIDEO: America’s « War under the Table » in Syria: Former Blackwater Mercenaries Training FSA Terrorists

‘British-born jihadists fighting Assad in Syria’ – captured photographer

US Authorizes Financial Support to Free Syrian Army

Christians threatened by Free Syrian Army seek Government Protection

Armed groups in Syria receive weapons from Israel

John McCain–’Shameful’ that US is not arming Syrian thugs

CIA officers regulating arms traffic to Syria opposition groups

CONFIRMED: US CIA Arming Terrorists in Syria

UK, US spying for Syrian rebels: Report

US « Intelligence Assets » leading the Syrian « Opposition », the Role of the Bilderberg and the CFR

Syria massacre dead mostly rebels, activists say

Les crimes de l’ « Armée syrienne libre » que les médias traditionnels cachent
Third Russian-Chinese Veto Blocks the Road to World War III

Syria crisis: Turkey training rebels, says FSA fighter

Syria Rebels Face Growing List of Crimes

Towards A « Soft Invasion »? The Launching of a « Humanitarian War » against Syria

Massacres in Aleppo by Western-armed « Free Syrian Army »

Syrie : absence de diplomatie et destruction

Kidnapped Syrian TV host executed by rebels

Report: MEK to join terrorists in Syria

Hassan Nasrallah sur la Syrie

Syria Strategy looks like Bloody Repeat

SYRIA: Criminal Propagandists: Killing Civilians as Part of a « Humanitarian Mandate »

CRIMES MEDIATIQUES ou les conséquences meurtrières de la désinformation

FLASHBACK juin 2011: La déstabilisation de la Syrie et la guerre élargie au Moyen-Orient

Syrie : Des mensonges qui ne changeront pas la dure réalité pour l’Occident

SYRIE : Cinq longues minutes de vérité sur la Cinq

Syrian Liberators, Bearing Toy Guns

U.N. Observers In Syria Suspend Mission After Escalating Violence

US backtracks on claims Russia is arming Syrian regime

Saudi Arabia plans to fund Syria rebel army

Syria arrests over 40 Germans for smuggling arms to rebels

Turkey denies arms shipment to Syria opposition

U.S. says weighing ‘next steps’ with partners on Syria

U.S. military completes initial planning for Syria

Imran Hossein–NATO Wants Turkey To Invade Syria

War Escalation: ‘Turkey probing Syrian anti-air defense’

Un avion turc abattu par l’armée syrienne : Quid des milliers de Syriens abattus par les forces pro-turques ?

Turkey to ‘consult’ NATO allies after Syria downs fighter jet

Turkey warns Syria: Any solider who approaches border will be seen as a threat

Turkey dubs Syria ‘a clear threat’, vows to retaliate

Syrian forces ‘fire at second Turkish plane’

BRIT FIGHTER JETS PUT ON SYRIA ALERT

Syria warns NATO against action over Turkish plane 

US to help Turkey hold Syria ‘accountable’

Turkey admits downed plane had strayed into Syrian airspace

Turkish PM vows to help ‘liberate Syria from dictatorship’

Washington and Ankara Intelligence Op? Syria Blamed for Turkish Provocation

Report: Turkey deploys tanks on Syrian border; Assad says country in a ‘real state of war’

Syria shot down a Turkish plane believing it was an Israeli plane, a Syrian government minister said.

Graphic video: Syrian family ‘slain by rebels’ in Hama massacre

Syrian rebels accused of massacre after seven die in attack on TV station

Hamas member killed in Syria, Mossad suspected

The U.S. & Syria: Facts you should know

Condoleezza Rice calls on U.S. to arm Syria rebels

GRTV: Covert War Waged Against Syria Analyzing Turkey’s role, foreign influence and the Free Syrian Army

Explosion in Iran-Turkey gas pipeline

What Russia Fears in Syrian Conflict

France says Geneva Syria plans implies Assad must go

Russian specialists involved in Syria intercepting Turkish jet, sources say

Doubts cast on Turkey’s Story of Jet dropped by Syria

Whose Spring? The CIA’s Hand In The Rise of Islamists And International Terrorist Groups

Regime-Changers’ Report Card

VIDEO – CIA, MI6 agents direct massacres in Syria: American analyst (avec Stephen Lendman, juif pas juifiste)

John Bolton: Syria, World War and the destruction of America

Syrian Foreign Minister–’We are not in Civil War but rather fighting terrorists’

VIDEO – Thierry Meyssan sur le projet de coup d’État médiatique en Syrie

Un nouveau massacre en Syrie Nouvelles révélations sur les victimes de Houla.

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrian rebels’ arsenal includes remote-controlled truck bombs

US accelerates preparations for ‘no-fly zone’ in Syria

‘Dozens of Kuwaiti jihadists’ join different nationalities to enlist in Free Syrian Army

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrie: l’OTAN prépare une vaste opération d’intoxication

L’affaire de Houla illustre le retard du renseignement occidental en Syrie

« Humanitarian War Criminals » in High Office: Was the Houla Massacre Ordered by the Western Military Alliance?

Propaganda War: The Houla Massacre Committed by The West’s “Free Syrian Army” But They Accuse Syrian Gov’t

Pro-Assads were ‘picked’ by killers in Houla massacre: US author

UK to set up camps inside Syria to help rebels

‘US, Israel plot to topple al-Assad Govt’

How not to stop the violence in Syria — Elie Wiesel’s latest bright idea

LOL!!! Netanyahu–Assad slaughtering Syrian civilians with the aid of Iran, Hezbollah

Report: Rebels Responsible for Houla Massacre

SYRIE : Les rebelles sont responsables du massacre de Houla

Le narratif syrien de l’Occident se base sur “un mec dans un appartement au Royaume-Uni” Un propagandiste de l’opposition syrienne dans un appartement en Angleterre, la seule source citée par la presse occidentale

Advanced State of Readiness: US Military Lobbies for War with Syria

SYRIA: NATO’s Next « Humanitarian » War? ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK

Chantage contre la Russie : les États-Unis promeuvent les massacres pour justifier la guerre contre la Syrie

La Syrie au programme du Bilderberg

The Houla Hoaxsters

Clinton: Russia Must Embrace Regime Change in Syria

Russia won’t permit foreign intervention in Syria

In address to parliament, Assad blames Syria crisis on ‘outside forces’

Antiwar.com yet again obscures Israel’s role in Syria

VIDEO – BHL, le juif éternel fauteur de guerres

VIDEO – BHL:«Je suis le représentant de la tribu d’Israël»

VIDEO – BHL reconnaît une intervention israelienne en Libye

Oh la la, BBC : Une photo d’Irak pour illustrer le massacre de Houla ?

Le massacre de Houla était planifié et a été instrumentalisé

MEDIA DISINFORMATION: West Desperately Attempts to Spin Syrian Crisis

SYRIA, Atrocities were not committed by the government but by armed gangs Vatican News Service refutes Western media reports

UN Report on Houla Massacre Conflicts With Rebel Accounts

Russian Journalist Exposes Propaganda Lies about Houla Massacre- by Stephen Lendman

Syrian President Assad vows to keep fighting Western-backed terrorists

Le massacre de Houla fait partie du nettoyage ethnique du gouvernorat d’Homs prévu comme base arrière pour l’ASL

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

May 28 2012: 108 Syrians Killed Just prior to Annan’s meeting with Assad (ce massacre a pouvait pas être un hasard, programmé pour affaiblir Assad juste avant sa rencontre avec des émissaires de l’ONU!!)

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

US Blames Russia, Iran for Upcoming Syria War

Blackwater agents involved in Syria unrest

French president says Syria’s Assad has to go

UN-backed action in Syria is an option, Hollande says

Romney Calls for Action on Syria, but His Party Is Divided

The BBC’s Photo Fib of a Syrian Massacre (des images de bébés irakiens tués détournées pour fins de propagande: pour illustrer des tueries en Syrie…)

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible (Il ne s’est pas montré aussi inquiet lors des bombardements de civils libanais – incluant bien sûr femmes et enfants – lors de l’attaque israélienne contre le Liban en 2006.)

Rebels behind Houla massacre, US plan to destabilize Syria in full swing

The Houla Massacre: US-Sponsored Terrorists « Killed Families Loyal to the Government »

VIDEO – Jean Marie Le Pen sur la Syrie, l’Iran et l’arme nucléaire

The Crusade for Syria: A Big Lie

NATO’s ‘Civil War’ Machine Rolls Into Syria

Unholy Alliance Forming Against Syria Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Brussels, Arab puppet regimes, Extremist Wahhabis, Al-Qaeda

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

Syria Under Attack by Globalist Death Squad Experts

SYRIE. Opération terroriste appuyée par les États-Unis: Tuer des civils innocents pour justifier une guerre humanitaire

Top IDF officer: Terrorist threat in Syria could be directed at Israel: The deterioration of Syria’s central regime could lead to a growing terrorist threat against Israel, a top Israel Defense Minister said…

Que reste-t-il du printemps arabe ? Des espérances trahies.

The Arab Spring story in a nutshell: Fake springs, post-modern coup d’etat

Pourquoi les Etats-Unis arment-ils Al-Qaïda en Syrie ?

Syrian Troops Find Mass Grave, Blame Rebels

Fifty US, French, British Spies in Turkey “Working Very Closely on Syria Issue”

Les États-Unis : pourvoyeurs de terroristes et fauteurs de guerre en Syrie

Zionist Operative working as an aide to Romney: Obama “dragged his feet” on Syria

 

Sur ce blog:

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT CONTRE LE GVT SYRIEN!

‘A CLEAN BREAK’: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur…

John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

« De la dictature à la démocratie »

L’American Jewish Committee derrière les mensonges humanitaires qui ont rendu possible la guerre en Libye

L’actuel président du National Endowment for Democracy, le marionnettiste du « printemps arabe », serait un ancien de l’ADL

Ron Paul explique le non-interventionnisme dans les affaires étrangères

Philip Zelikow (signataire du PNAC): La Libye est un modèle pour la redivision du Moyen-Orient

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Netanyahou: « Nous vaincrons l’Islam militant »

Netanyahou est confiant qu’un jour Israël et ses alliés occidentaux vaincront l’Islam, propageront la démocratie aux quatre coins du monde et débarrasseront le monde des armes de mort massive. (Son papa BenZion Netanyahou avait soi-disant prédit que « l’Islam militant » ferait un jour tomber les tours jumelles du WTC)
Netanyhu–We’ll beat ‘militant Islam by end of century’

BHL veut faire réécrire le Coran par un juif Le criminel de guerre et fervent partisan du Grand Israël, Bernard-Henri Lévy a déclaré qu’il souhaitait voir le Saint Coran réécrit et, de plus, par un juif.

En passant, l’arrivée de partis islamistes au pouvoir n’a rien à voir avec une quelconque islamisation du monde blanc européen. Ça a plutôt à voir avec le fait que Israël a besoin de se donner une légitimité aux yeux du monde pour envahir ses voisins. C’est pourquoi il importe pour Israël de remplacer les dirigeants de ses pays voisins par des « islamistes intégristes », justifiant ainsi leur invasion par les troupes sionistes et permettant ainsi la réalisation du GRAND ISRAËL, base terrestre de l’empire planétaire d’Israël.

 

Petit problème, Bibi! C’est que maintenant le public peut savoir (grâce à des documents déclassifiés) que tes amis les Bronfman, ces gangsters milliardaires recyclés dans la distillerie et l’industrie du divertissement, qui ont secrètement financé Israël et son arsenal de mort, savent tout ce qu’il y a à savoir sur la production d’armes biologiques — privilège dont ils jouissent depuis qu’ils ont financé la production d’Anthrax (assez pour tuer 30 fois la population mondiale) au Canada durant la Seconde guerre mondiale. Il s’agit des mêmes Bronfman qui, des décennies plus tard, (més)useront de leur pouvoir afin que soient éjectés de leur poste les généraux opposés à la guerre en Irak.

Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer announce new anti-Islam ad

Fox News Contributor: “A High Percentage” Of Muslims “Hate Christians And Jews”; “The Real Problem Is The Quran”

Demonizing Muslims. America’s Worldwide Witch Hunt Heading into a « World War III Scenario »?

VIDEO – LES IDIOTS UTILES DE LA PROPAGANDE JUIVE INTERNATIONALE DU CLASH DES CIVILISATION LANCENT LA Déclaration de Bruxelles, qui établit une ligne d’action stratégique  contrant le programme islamique d’imposition mondiale de la Charia.
Il faut vraiment être un attardé mental pour penser que l’Islam a un programme d’imposition mondiale de la Charia! Ils veulent juste avoir le droit de légiférer par exemple les mariages et les divorces selon la loi musulmane – pas question de l’imposer aux non-musulmans! Pareil comme on impose pas les principes chrétiens catholiques aux non-cathos! Notez que le mariage a toujours été un fait religieux – l’union de deux êtres qui s’aiment scellée dans l’Esprit… D’ailleurs à quoi ça sert qu’un mariage soit scellé par l’État, sauf pour obtenir des avantages légaux et financiers?! $$$$$$$$$ Ça c’est bien l’Occident impie! L’État n’a pas à sceller l’union spirituelle de deux êtres, l’État est là pour défendre nos DROITS. Dans presque toutes les cultures incluant la nôtre qui est séculaire depuis pas très longtemps!, le mariage a toujours été un fait religieux, pareil comme nous ici la madame préfère souvent se marier en blanc à l’Église — et il y a pas si longtemps fallait se justifier face à la foi catholique pour avoir le droit de divorcer (c’est en leur tordant le bras qu’on a obtenu de l’Église le droit de divorcer, et on l’a obtenu tout simplement parce que plus personne ne tient l’Église en autorité étant donné que pu personne ne pratique!). Les musulmans sont juste pas des impies comme qui déféquons sans gêne sur notre héritage spirituel et ancestral.  Toute personne qui embarque dans ce prétendu « Clash des civilisations » et en fait la promotion doit être mise hors d’état de nuire, de façon civilisée mais avec rigueur et fermeté.

 

 

THE MYTH OF THE MUSLIM TIDE

http://muslimtide.com/

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1242434–popular-anti-muslim-myths-busted-in-new-book

http://www.straight.com/article-764521/vancouver/douglas-saunders-delivers-impressive-rebuttal-rightwing-fear-mongers-myth-muslim-tide

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/debunking-the-myth-of-the-stealth-jihad/article4511675/

EXCERPT:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/08/29/book-excerpt-the-muslim-tide-that-wasnt/

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/doug-saunders/doug-saunders-myth-of-the-muslim-tide_b_1837315.html

AUDIO:

http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2012/09/03/the-myth-of-the-muslim-tide/

 

Sur ce blog:

L’ancien responsable de l’Unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA estime que l’Islam radical est une menace imaginaire.

L’ancien directeur de l’unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA, Michael Scheuer accuse Israël de détenir le Congrès et d’entraîner les USA vers le désastre d’une guerre contre l’Iran

DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE, DEVOIR DE VITRIFIER L’IRAN

Inversion accusatoire : l’empire israélite accuse l’Iran d’être « la plus grave menace pour la paix dans le monde »

Larry SILVERSTEIN et David YERUSHALMI (gourou de l’anti-Islam aux USA), anciens patrons de l’épouse du candidat présidentiel Newt Gingrich

“Ils menacent de sanctions et de représailles militaires tous ceux qui émettent des doutes sur la Shoah et le 11 septembre » — Président Ahmadinejad

L’Iran ne croit pas la fable convenue du 11 septembre ; les États-Unis en mal de casus belli l’accusent d’avoir monté le coup

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Les massmédias antisémites? Le Washington Post rapporte que le virus Flame serait, comme Stuxnet, une cyber-arme us-israélienne contre l’Iran

 

WashPost – U.S., Israel developed Flame computer virus to slow Iranian nuclear efforts, officials say

 

Le virus informatique Flame créé par les Etats-Unis et « Israël » (presse)

L’équipe du site Al Manar

Levant définitivement le doute sur l’origine du virus informatique Flame, conçu pour dérober des informations sur le programme nucléaire iranien, le Washington Post, citant mardi, des « responsables occidentaux proches du dossier » vient d’affirmer qu’il est bel et bien une cyber-arme conçue par les Etats-Unis et l’entité sioniste.

La NSA américaine, chargée de l’espionnage informatique, et la CIA ont travaillé avec l’armée israélienne pour mettre au point ce programme informatique destiné à se répandre dans les réseaux informatiques iraniens, copier des fichiers, faire des captures d’écrans et renvoyer ces informations discrètement, selon le quotidien.

Les Etats-Unis et l’entité sioniste ont souvent été soupçonnés d’être à l’origine de Flame et d’un autre virus voisin, Stuxnet, qui s’est attaqué en 2010 aux centrifugeuses du programme nucléaire iranien.

Mais Washington refuse tout commentaire sur le sujet, se contentant d’affirmer qu’internet fait partie des domaines d’intérêt de la défense et du renseignement.

« Il s’agit de préparer le champ de bataille pour un autre type d’action clandestine », a affirmé au Washington Post un ancien haut responsable américain du renseignement à propos de Flame.

Le virus Flame a été détecté dans différentes régions du monde, notamment le Moyen-Orient, l’Europe, l’Amérique du Nord et l’Asie-Pacifique, l’Iran étant le premier pays visé par ces attaques.

Il existait depuis quatre ans, mais il n’avait été identifié que fin mai par le fabricant russe d’anti-virus Kaspersky Lab, qui avait noté que la sophistication de ce virus utilisé à des fins de « cyber-espionnage » était telle qu’il supposait le concours d’un Etat.

Cyber warfare

Why is Israel suddenly speaking so openly about cyber-warfare? The Israel Defense Forces Spokesman’s website is not usually in the business of breaking stories, so Sunday’s report defining…

US, Israel wrote Stuxnet, officials say

Israel suspected of ‘cyberweapon’ strike on Middle East computers

Stuxnet : un ver créé par les Etats-Unis et Israël

US unleashed Stuxnet cyber war on Iran to appease Israel

Breaking news: NY Times claims US released Stuxnet with Israel and it accidentally escaped

Stuxnet leak prompts US House to consider prosecution of journalists

Computer Virus named after Islamic Messiah found in Iranian and Israeli systems

“Netanyahu has Decided to Attack Iran Before the U.S. Elections in November”
Henry Kissinger, upon receiving Israel’s presidential award from Israeli President Shimon Peres, said the moment of truth on the Iran question will be in the months ahead.

L’Empire britannique [lire: Israël et la communauté organisée] planifie une guerre thermonucléaire et promeut « ses terroristes » !

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

 

 

Sur ce blog:

Netanyahou accuse le New York Times et Haaretz de donner le ton de la campagne anti-Israël à travers le monde

Même Reuters n’est pas à l’abri du congrès juif européen et de son président milliardaire

LE GOUVERNEMENT CANADIEN SAIT COMMENT PLAIRE À SON MAÎTRE ET SE PORTE VOLONTAIRE POUR RAYER L’IRAN DE LA CARTE ADVENANT LE CAS OÙ LES USA REFUSERAIENT DE LE FAIRE

L’ancien directeur de l’unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA, Michael Scheuer accuse Israël de détenir le Congrès et d’entraîner les USA vers le désastre d’une guerre contre l’Iran

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

À voir

 

Remerciements bien mérités à tous ceux et celles qui ont contribué à rendre ces vidéos disponibles sur le Net gratuitement, plus spécialement merci à l’équipe du Savoisien

Homo Toxicus (English)

The Fluoride Deception: Amy Goodman w/ Christopher Bryson

Le jeu de l’argent

Die Rothschilds Aktien auf Waterloo – 1940 [ENG SUB]

The Story Behind the Bernie Madoff Scandal – « The Gentiles did this to us! »

The Diamond Empire: The Oppenheimer Family Cartel and Artificial Scarcity

Human Trafficking in Israel

Bronfman Biography

MEYER LANSKY – GANGLAND : (-1- -2- -3- -4- -5-)

Rise and Fall of the Jewish Mafia : (-1- -2- -3- -4-)

MURDER INC. – GANGLAND : (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Victor Ostrovsky Ex Mossad Agent: (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Michael Collins Piper – Final Judgment – JFK Assassination Israeli Connection

The Dark Side of the Anti-Defamation League (2e copie)

Diffamation (fr) (v.o.a.)

The Hatemongers Among Us

Jewish Media Supremacy (ch.5 from « Jewish Supremacism ») by David Duke

Is the Major Media Controlled? – Willis Carto

La Toile (Le Unabomber, le LSD et l’internet) (fr)The Net (v.o.a.)

Edward Bernays – Propaganda (fr)

AIPAC : Un oeil sur la planète. Le reportage de France 2 qui n’a pas plu à Israël

Le lobby pro-israélien aux USA (v.o.a.) (no narrator)

Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby

Le Canada sous influence: le poids du lobby pro-Israël à Ottawaretour sur le grand reportage

The Iraq War was Made for Israel, by Israeli-Firsters inside the Bush admin

The Neocon Agenda with Stephen Sniegoski

The War Party

Vendre la guerre aux Américains (v.f.) (War Made Easy V.O.A.)

Qui est derrière la propagande anti-Islam?

How Zionist Jews Invented Modern Terrorism

Proof Israel did 911 (télécharger)

911 was a Jew Job

5 Dancing Israelis Arrested on 911

Israel et le 11 septembre par Ryan Dawson v.f.

911: Les militaires américains savent qu’Israël a fait le coup (s-t fr)

The INSLAW Affair

L’arme secrète d’Israel (Mordecai Vanunu) en v.f.

Israel’s Secret Weapon (Mordecai Vanunu) (télécharger v.ang.)

Le nouveau désordre mondial (montage)

Jenin Jenin (2002)

People and the Land

Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land

The Rise of Israel’s Military RabbisPt2

Baruch Goldstein’s Massacre at the Jerusalem Mosque (télécharger)

Frontline: Israel’s Next War

God’s Jewish Warriors

Jérusalem: dérive radicale de deux rabbins

Rabbi Friedman: « Destroy Holy Sites (…) Kill the Men, Women and Children and Cattle

Le Betar Tagar de FranceLa milice juive de la LDJ s’entraîne dans des bâtiments protégés par la police française

Ciel Mon Mardi bagarre en direct (version courte)

La nouvelle extrême-droite et l’alliance sioniste contre l’Islam

The Bloody History of Communism (playlist)

The Jewish Hand in Bolshevism/Communism (Jura Lina)

La déclaration Balfour: la terre promise en échange que les Juifs poussent les États-Unis en guerre

Bronfman a financé et supervisé la production d’assez d’Anthrax pour exterminer 30 fois la pop mondiale

28 avril 1939 : Hitler évoque le cas de la Palestine

Hitler contre les usuriers internationaux

Adolf Hitler – ‘We Shall Crush the Freemasons!’

Adolf Hitler: Our enemies today face the entire German Volk!

International Jewry Won WWII Their Purim

Les dossiers secrets du nazisme – VENGEANCE (Empoisonner les Allemands)

L’extrémiste François Genoud: De Hitler à Carlos – National Socialiste Suisse

Le 11 septembre et le retour du révisionnisme

The Karma of Untruthfulness Documentary – feat. Terry Boardman (Rudolf Steiner media studies)

A Holocaust Inquiry (ch.12 from Jewish Supremacism) by David Duke

Le Phénomène Herman Rosenblat – Un Survivant de la Shoah balance tout ! (reportage en v.o.a.)

Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil

Auschwitz—The Surprising Hidden Truth

Ernst Zundel-The Great Holocaust Trial in Canada

Honest Media Today ( ; Understanding Anti-Semitism, Jewish Ritual Murder, The Holocaust Unveiled: The Persecution of the Revisionnists, Zionist War Crimes, etc.)

Léon DegrelleEntretien avec Degrelle

Vincent Reynouard (chaîne youtube)Autre chaîne – (télécharger)

David IrvingDavid Irving, l’origine de l’insurrection hongroise de 1956

Robert Faurisson

Germar Rudolf (2e copie)

Fritz Berg

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Worst Case of Ethnic Cleansing in Western History

via revisionistreview.blogspot.com

Monday, June 18, 2012

Worst case of ethnic cleansing in western history

The Hoffman Wire
June 18, 2012

The European Atrocity You Never Heard About


In the largest episode of forced migration in history, millions of German-speaking civilians were sent to Germany from Czechoslovakia (above) and other European countries after World War II by order of the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union.

By R.M. Douglas

THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION • June 11, 2012

http://chronicle.com/article/The-European-Atrocity-You/132123/

The screams that rang throughout the darkened cattle car crammed with deportees, as it jolted across the icy Polish countryside five nights before Christmas, were Dr. Loch’s only means of locating his patient. The doctor, formerly chief medical officer of a large urban hospital, now found himself clambering over piles of baggage, fellow passengers, and buckets used as toilets, only to find his path blocked by an old woman who ignored his request to move aside. On closer examination, he discovered that she had frozen to death.
Finally he located the source of the screams, a pregnant woman who had gone into premature labor and was hemorrhaging profusely. When he attempted to move her from where she lay into a more comfortable position, he found that « she was frozen to the floor with her own blood. » Other than temporarily stanching the bleeding, Loch was unable to do anything to help her, and he never learned whether she had lived or died. When the train made its first stop, after more than four days in transit, 16 frost-covered corpses were pulled from the wagons before the remaining deportees were put back on board to continue their journey. A further 42 passengers would later succumb to the effects of their ordeal, among them Loch’s wife.




An estimated 500,000 people died in the course of the organized expulsions; survivors were left in Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves.

During the Second World War, tragic scenes like those were commonplace, as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin moved around entire populations like pieces on a chessboard, seeking to reshape the demographic profile of Europe according to their own preferences. What was different about the deportation of Loch and his fellow passengers, however, was that it took place by order of the United States and Britain as well as the Soviet Union, nearly two years after the declaration of peace.

Between 1945 and 1950, Europe witnessed the largest episode of forced migration, and perhaps the single greatest movement of population, in human history. Between 12 million and 14 million German-speaking civilians—the overwhelming majority of whom were women, old people, and children under 16—were forcibly ejected from their places of birth in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, and what are today the western districts of Poland. As The New York Times noted in December 1945, the number of people the Allies proposed to transfer in just a few months was about the same as the total number of all the immigrants admitted to the United States since the beginning of the 20th century. They were deposited among the ruins of Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves as best they could. The number who died as a result of starvation, disease, beatings, or outright execution is unknown, but conservative estimates suggest that at least 500,000 people lost their lives in the course of the operation.
Most disturbingly of all, tens of thousands perished as a result of ill treatment while being used as slave labor (or, in the Allies’ cynical formulation, « reparations in kind ») in a vast network of camps extending across central and southeastern Europe—many of which, like Auschwitz I and Theresienstadt, were former German concentration camps kept in operation for years after the war. As Sir John Colville, formerly Winston Churchill’s private secretary, told his colleagues in the British Foreign Office in 1946, it was clear that « concentration camps and all they stand for did not come to an end with the defeat of Germany. » Ironically, no more than 100 or so miles away from the camps being put to this new use, the surviving Nazi leaders were being tried by the Allies in the courtroom at Nuremberg on a bill of indictment that listed « deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population » under the heading of « crimes against humanity. »
By any measure, the postwar expulsions were a manmade disaster and one of the most significant examples of the mass violation of human rights in recent history. Yet although they occurred within living memory, in time of peace, and in the middle of the world’s most densely populated continent, they remain all but unknown outside Germany itself. On the rare occasions that they rate more than a footnote in European-history textbooks, they are commonly depicted as justified retribution for Nazi Germany’s wartime atrocities or a painful but necessary expedient to ensure the future peace of Europe. As the historian Richard J. Evans asserted in In Hitler’s Shadow (1989) the decision to purge the continent of its German-speaking minorities remains « defensible » in light of the Holocaust and has shown itself to be a successful experiment in « defusing ethnic antagonisms through the mass transfer of populations. »
Even at the time, not everyone agreed. George Orwell, an outspoken opponent of the expulsions, pointed out in his essay « Politics and the English Language » that the expression « transfer of population » was one of a number of euphemisms whose purpose was « largely the defense of the indefensible. » The philosopher Bertrand Russell acidly inquired: « Are mass deportations crimes when committed by our enemies during war and justifiable measures of social adjustment when carried out by our allies in time of peace? » A still more uncomfortable observation was made by the left-wing publisher Victor Gollancz, who reasoned that « if every German was indeed responsible for what happened at Belsen, then we, as members of a democratic country and not a fascist one with no free press or parliament, were responsible individually as well as collectively » for what was being done to noncombatants in the Allies’ name.
That the expulsions would inevitably cause death and hardship on a very large scale had been fully recognized by those who set them in motion. To a considerable extent, they were counting on it. For the expelling countries—especially Czechoslovakia and Poland—the use of terror against their German-speaking populations was intended not simply as revenge for their wartime victimization, but also as a means of triggering a mass stampede across the borders and finally achieving their governments’ prewar ambition to create ethnically homogeneous nation-states. (Before 1939, less than two-thirds of Poland’s population, and only a slightly larger proportion of Czechoslovakia’s, consisted of gentile Poles, Czechs, or Slovaks.)
For the Soviets, who had « compensated » Poland for its territorial losses to the Soviet Union in 1939 by moving its western border more than 100 miles inside German territory, the clearance of the newly « Polish » western lands and the dumping of their millions of displaced inhabitants amid the ruins of the former Reich served Stalin’s twin goals of impeding Germany’s postwar recovery and eliminating any possibility of a future Polish-German rapprochement. The British viewed the widespread suffering that would inevitably attend the expulsions as a salutary form of re-education of the German population. « Everything that brings home to the Germans the completeness and irrevocability of their defeat, » Deputy Prime Minister Clement Richard Attlee wrote in 1943, « is worthwhile in the end. » And the Americans, as Laurence Steinhardt, ambassador to Prague, recorded, hoped that by displaying an « understanding » and cooperative attitude toward the expelling countries’ desire to be rid of their German populations, the United States could demonstrate its sympathy for those countries’ national aspirations and prevent them from drifting into the Communist orbit.
The Allies, then, knowingly embarked on a course that, as the British government was warned in 1944 by its own panel of experts, was « bound to cause immense suffering and dislocation. » That the expulsions did not lead to the worst consequences that could be expected from the chaotic cattle drive of millions of impoverished, embittered, and rootless deportees into a war-devastated country that had nowhere to put them was due to three main factors.
The first was the skill with which the postwar German chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, drew the expellees into mainstream politics, defusing the threat of a potentially radical and disruptive bloc. The second was the readiness of most expellees—the occasionally crass or undiplomatic statements of their leaders notwithstanding—to renounce the use or threat of force as a means of redressing their grievances. The third, and by far the most important, was the 30-year-long « economic miracle » that made possible the housing, feeding, and employment of the largest homeless population with which any industrial country has ever had to contend. (In East Germany, on the other hand, the fact that the standard of living for the indigenous population was already so low meant that the economic gap between it and the four million arriving expellees was more easily bridged.)
The downside of « economic miracles, » though, is that, as their name suggests, they can’t be relied upon to come along where and when they are most needed. By extraordinary good fortune, the Allies avoided reaping the harvest of their own recklessness. Nonetheless, the expulsions have cast a long and baleful shadow over central and southeastern Europe, even to the present day. Their disruptive demographic, economic, and even—as Eagle Glassheim has pointed out—environmental consequences continue to be felt more than 60 years later. The overnight transformation of some of the most heterogeneous regions of the European continent into virtual ethnic monoliths changed the trajectory of domestic politics in the expelling countries in significant and unpredicted ways. Culturally, the effort to eradicate every trace of hundreds of years of German presence and to write it out of national and local histories produced among the new Polish and Czech settler communities in the cleared areas what Gregor Thum has described as a state of « amputated memory. » As Thum shows in his groundbreaking study of postwar Wroclaw—until 1945 and the removal of its entire population, the German city of Breslau—the challenge of confronting their hometown’s difficult past is one that post-Communist Wroclawites have only recently taken up. In most other parts of Central Europe, it has hardly even begun.
Still less so in the English-speaking world. It is important to note that the expulsions are in no way to be compared to the genocidal Nazi campaign that preceded them. But neither can the supreme atrocity of our time become a yardstick by which gross abuses of human rights are allowed to go unrecognized for what they are. Contradicting Allied rhetoric that asserted that World War II had been fought above all to uphold the dignity and worth of all people, the Germans included, thousands of Western officials, servicemen, and technocrats took a full part in carrying out a program that, when perpetrated by their wartime enemies, they did not hesitate to denounce as contrary to all principles of humanity.
The degree of cognitive dissonance to which this led was exemplified by the career of Colonel John Fye, chief U.S. liaison officer for expulsion affairs to the Czechoslovak government. The operation he had helped carry out, he acknowledged, drew in « innocent people who had never raised so much as a word of protest against the Czechoslovak people. » To accomplish it, women and children had been thrown into detention facilities, « many of which were little better than the ex-German concentration camps. » Yet these stirrings of unease did not prevent Fye from accepting a decoration from the Prague government for what the official citation candidly described as his valuable services « in expelling Germans from Czechoslovakia. »
Today we have come not much further than Fye did in acknowledging the pivotal role played by the Allies in conceiving and executing an operation that exceeded in both scale and lethality the violent breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. It is unnecessary to attribute this to any « taboo » or « conspiracy of silence. » Rather, what is denied is not the fact of the expulsions themselves, but their significance.
Many European commentators have maintained that to draw attention to them runs the risk of diminishing the horror that ought properly to be reserved for the Holocaust and other Nazi atrocities, or giving rise to a self-pitying « victim » mentality among today’s generation of Germans, for whom the war is an increasingly distant memory. Czechs, Poles, and citizens of other expelling states fear the legal ramifications of a re-examination of the means by which millions of erstwhile citizens of those countries were deprived of their nationality, liberty, and property. To this day, the postwar decrees expropriating and denationalizing Germans remain on the statute book of the Czech Republic, and their legality has recently been reaffirmed by the Czech constitutional court.
Some notable exceptions aside, like T. David Curp, Matthew Frank, and David Gerlach, English-speaking historians—out of either understandable sympathy for Germany’s victims or reluctance to complicate the narrative of what is still justifiably considered a « good war »—have also not been overeager to delve into the history of a messy, complex, morally ambiguous, and politically sensitive episode, in which few if any of those involved appear in a creditable light.
By no means are all of these concerns unworthy ones. But neither are they valid reasons for failing to engage seriously with an episode of such obvious importance, and to integrate it within the broader narrative of modern European history. For historians to write—and, still worse, to teach—as though the expulsions had never taken place or, having occurred, are of no particular significance to the societies affected by them, is both intellectually and pedagogically unsustainable.
The fact that population transfers are currently making a comeback on the scholarly and policy agenda also suggests that we should scrutinize with particular care the most extensive experiment made with them to date. Despite the gruesome history, enthusiasts continue to chase the mirage of « humane » mass deportations as a means of resolving intractable ethnic problems. Andrew Bell-Fialkoff, in a much-cited study, has advocated population transfers as a valuable tool so long as they are « conducted in a humane, well-organized manner, like the transfer of Germans from Czechoslovakia by the Allies in 1945-47. » John Mearsheimer, Chaim Kaufmann, Michael Mann and others have done likewise.
Few wars today, whether within or between states, do not feature an attempt by one or both sides to create facts on the ground by forcibly displacing minority populations perceived as alien to the national community. And although the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court has attempted to restrain this tendency by prohibiting mass deportations, Elazar Barkan maintains that such proscriptions are far from absolute, and that « today there is no single code of international law that explicitly outlaws population transfers either in terms of group or individual rights protections. »
The expulsion of the ethnic Germans is thus of contemporary as well as historical relevance. At present, though, the study of many vital elements of this topic is still in its earliest stages. Innumerable questions—about the archipelago of camps and detention centers, the precise number and location of which are still undetermined; the sexual victimization of female expellees, which was on a scale to rival the mass rapes perpetrated by Red Army soldiers in occupied Germany; the full part played by the Soviet and U.S. governments in planning and executing the expulsions—remain to be fully answered. At a moment when the surviving expellees are passing away and many, though far from all, of the relevant archives have been opened, the time has come for this painful but pivotal chapter in Europe’s recent history to receive at last the scholarly attention it deserves.
R.M. Douglas is an associate professor of history at Colgate University. 
This essay is adapted from his new book, published by Yale University Press, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans After the Second World War.

Editorial Reviews for Orderly and Humane

Review

Orderly and Humane is an outstanding and well-written work that fills a significant gap in books written in English about this large subject and the very period of its compass. It ought to be in every serious American library and should be required reading for scholars interested in the history of the end of the Second World War and the years thereafter in Europe.”—John Lukacs, author of The Future of  History and Five Days in London, May 1940

(John Lukacs )

“R.M. Douglas has written a fair-minded, deeply researched and courageous book that carefully demystifies the claims and accusations surrounding the awful history of the expulsion of the ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe. A first-rate work, Orderly and Humane compels us to admit that the postwar expulsions were not simply a regrettable accident but a deliberate policy of ethnic cleansing on a breathtaking scale that decisively shaped postwar Europe’s history.”—William I. Hitchcock, author of The Bitter Road to Freedom: The Human Consequences of Allied Victory in World War II Europe

(William I. Hitchcock )

“The tragedy of the post-World War II ethnic German refugees and expellees has been told before but no account is based on so many original documents from so many countries as Douglas’s eminently readable work.”—Istvan Deak, Columbia University (Istvan Deak )

__________________________
Keep On the Contrary Online: send a donation to keep us publishing
Every week as a public service On the Contrary alerts you to research leads, rare facts, new revisionist books and Michael Hoffman’s scintillating columns. These efforts require funding. Give something back in return for that which you have received: send a donation today and tell a friend about our work. Thank you!
***

 

 

PLUS DE DÉTAILS:

App Austin Joseph (ang.)

Bacque, James (ang.)

Bacque, James (fr.)

De Zayas Alfred-Maurice (ang.)

MacDonogh, Giles (ang.)

Sack, John (ang.)

INTERNATIONAL JEWRY WON WW2 THEIR PURIM

Les dossiers secrets du nazisme – VENGEANCE (Empoisonner les Allemands)

 

Sur ce blog:

LES VENGEURS

Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale

Parodie de procès et torture à Nuremberg

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Alex Jones et ses disciples ne peuvent-ils voir la contradiction flagrante?

Selon Infowars, LES NAZIS, National-Socialistes — nationalistes dits « extrêmes » — seraient les vrais marionnettistes de la réunion de Bilderberg… cette même réunion de Bilderberg qui, comme le confirme Wikileaks, croit que « le nationalisme est dangereux« !

http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-bilderberg-documents-nationalism-is-dangerous.html

Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”
Infowars exclusively obtains Senators’ notes from 1966 confab
By Paul Joseph Watson
Editor’s Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.

 

 

 <iframe width= »560″ height= »315″ src= »http://www.youtube.com/embed/YB7ZaK7Oa88″ frameborder= »0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

VIDEO – Alex Jones : « Bilderberg is a nazi plan »

 

Germany’s unforgivable crime
In a letter to Lord Robert Boothby, Winston Churchill explains the Nazi’s real crime« Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit. »

 

CLICK TO ENLARGE

 

 

« What thrust us into war were not Hitler’s political teachings: the cause, this time, was his successful attempt to establish a new economy. The causes of the war were: envy, greed, and fear. »
- Major-General John Frederick Charles Fuller (1948)

PATRIOTARD LIES ABOUT HITLER

(…)First of all, Adolf Hitler was a patriotic German nationalist who endeavored to create a Germany for Germans alone; quite the opposite of a “globalist NWO” type. Secondly, Hitler and his National Socialist movement were staunchly anti-Marxist/Communist/Bolshevik and therefore anti-Internationalist and anti-Globalist. The sinister agenda of Communism, not National Socialism, was internationalism — the overthrow and vanquishment of all existing nation states in order to establish a despotic global communist super-state. The pathological criminal madness known as Communism was, from its inception, an international Jewish conspiracy for the destruction and subjugation of the Gentile world whereupon a tyrannical global Jewish imperium would be established. Communism was nothing more than an expression and manifestation of the hateful, supremacist doctrines of the Jewish Talmud, which states: “Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.” (Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10) Alex is deceptively projecting the evil and destructive legacy of Jewish Bolshevism onto Hitler and Nazi Germany.

Simple logic and common sense sufficiently undermines Alex Jones’ idiotic rhetoric about Hitler and Nazism. If Hitler and the Nazis were really part of the “New World Order” then why did the entire capitalist and communist world (the USA, Britain, France, USSR, etc) gang up to completely annihilate and destroy Nazi Germany in the Second World War? If Hitler was part of this New World Order system then why was World War Two even necessary? If Adolf Hitler and National Socialism are such a benefit to the “globalists and elites” then why have they been subjected to such ruthless, non-stop vilification and demonization in the news and entertainment media of the West for the last 67 years since the end of World War II? Meanwhile the horrific, bloody transgressions of communism have been routinely white-washed, soft-peddled and covered up by the Western press and academia. If Hitler and National Socialism are so desirable for the elites ruling over us today, then why is Mein Kampf a banned book in Germany, Austria, Russia and many other European countries? Why is the Hitlerian Swastika a banned symbol in dozens of European nations? Why is Holocaust skepticism/revisionism a crime punishable by hefty fines and even imprisonment in over a dozen countries in Europe if the “globalists” support Nazism or if some Nazi remnant has any kind of influence today? Of course, none of this makes a lick of sense if Alex Jones were right about Hitler and National Socialism. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this idiocy is that Alex Jones is telling colossal lies about Hitler and Nazi Germany for the benefit of Jewry!

The reason Hitler and Nazi Germany were targeted for complete extinction by the Allies in 1939 is precisely because they weren’t complicit with the “New World Order” but valiant and courageous opponents of it. The reason Hitler and Nazi Germany are so viciously vilified by court historians and so brutally bad-mouthed by the mass media is precisely because they were fighting against the system of control commonly referred to as the “New World Order.” Hitler and Nazi Germany were so maniacally opposed by the nations that truly do comprise the New World Order because the New World Order is a Jew World Order and Hitler freed Germany from the death-grip of the Jews. Hitler was doing one thing which resulted in a massive lying hate-propaganda effort launched against him from Hollywood. That one thing was his campaign to break the stranglehold of the Jews on Germany. Hitler removed Jews from all positions of influence in German banking/finance, media/entertainment, politics/government, the legal profession, medicine, education, and so on, which they had monopolized up until that point. And he did all of this peacefully and non-violently. He didn’t round up Jews and shoot them, he simply made it illegal for Jews to own German newspapers or radio stations, he made it illegal for them to practice law or teach in schools or universities, etc. So the Jews began leaving Germany.

On top of freeing Germany from all Jewish influence, Hitler nearly eradicated unemployment in the country. Under National Socialist economic policies, unemployment went from 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% in 1938. (Folsom, Burton W. “New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America”. New York: Threshold Editions, 2008. p. 243) Hitler instituted ingenious economic reforms whereby he established his own State-controlled central bank and currency that was not backed by Jewish-controlled precious metals or foreign exchanges, but German productive labor. As a result of National Socialist economic policies, Germany’s economy flourished. Hitler freed Germany from the debt slavery imposed on free peoples by the usurious Jewish banking dynasties of Europe, led by the Rothschilds. Adolf Hitler saved and liberated Germany and its people! This is why, when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, International Jewry unleashed a perfidious economic war on the Third Reich in a concerted effort to bring down Hitler and his glorious National Socialist government who dared to free themselves from Jewish domination.

These are facts that Alex Jones is not going to tell you because Alex Jones is working for the very people that Adolf Hitler, and countless men before him, frantically warned us to be wary of.

At the 26:35 mark of the video Alex Jones claims:

“It was the eugenicist population reductionist Adolf Hitler who said “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it.” »

Let’s expose Alex’s first frivolous big lie. Hitler was not a “eugenicist population reductionist.” On the contrary, Hitler’s Party — the NSDAP — strongly encouraged the women of the Third Reich to be homemakers so that they could raise large families. The NSDAP gave financial incentives to couples and newlyweds so that they would have more children:

“On 5th July 1933 the Law for the Encouragement of Marriage was passed. This act gave all newly wed couples a loan of 1000 marks which was reduced by 25% for each child they had. If the couple went on to have four children the loan was wiped out. …

On the birthdate of Hitler’s mother, August 12th, awards of the Motherhood Cross were given to women who had produced the most children. A gold cross was awarded to mothers of 8 or more children, silver to mothers of 6 children and bronze to mothers of four children.” (Nazi Germany — Role of Women)

(…)

If anyone should be labeled a “eugenicist population reductionist” it would be the Jew Theodore Kaufman. Yet, unsurprisingly, Kaufman and his genocidal book didn’t make it into Alex’s so-called “documentary.”

Alex’s second hideous big lie is his assertion that Hitler said, “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it.” This is a variation of “If you tell a lie often enough, eventually people will come to believe it.” When and where did Hitler say this? Alex doesn’t say, and fails to provide a source for this quote. And do you know why? Because Hitler never said it. It is just one of countless fabricated quotes attributed to the Nazis by deceitful Jews. If Alex Jones had actually read Mein Kampf, he would have known that Hitler identified and condemned the “big lie” technique, in actuality stating that his enemies, the Jews and the Marxists, were the progenitors and masters of this strategy:

“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. [...] All this was inspired by the principle — which is quite true in itself — that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” (A. Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 185)

Hitler, in Mein Kampf, said that the Jews have an “unqualified capacity for falsehood.” Hitler said that the Jew, through the medium of his newspapers, is “always spreading falsehood” and if he tells the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some greater deceit. Hitler proclaimed the Jews to be the “Great Master of Lies.” Hitler said that falsehood and duplicity are the weapons with which the Jews wage war against non-Jews. (Mein Kampf, p. 275)

The fearless spirit of truth martyr Joseph Goebbels will live on!

Sometimes this fraudulent quote — “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it” — is attributed to the Third Reich’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels. The fact of the matter is that neither Goebbels nor Hitler made that statement. Goebbels, in fact, said the opposite, stressing that the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth:

“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” (Goebbels at Nuremberg Rally, 1934)

Just before his death in 1945, the virtuous truth-teller Joseph Goebbels said:

“There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.” (Heiber, Helmut. Goebbels. New York: Hawthorn, 1972. Print. p. 350.)

Moreover, the handbook outlining National Socialist propaganda methods unequivocally states that the foundation and supreme principal of National Socialist propaganda is the truth:

…we are not propagandizing lies and untruths as England did during the War, but rather we are preaching freedom and prosperity, socialism and patriotism to our confused people. Our struggle and our propaganda have one supreme principle: to take truth and only truth as the foundation of our propaganda.” (Handbook of the NS Propagandist, Munich: Reichs-Parteileitung der N.S.D.A.P., 1927, p.5)

Once again, Alex Jones, being a skilled liar and peddler of ridiculous falsehoods, manages to project the treacherous tactics of the Jews onto the enemies of Jews. In actuality, it was the crypto-Jewish communist leader Vladimir Lenin — the butcher of millions! — who openly advocated every imaginable evil, encouraging lies and deceit, terrorism and the wholesale slaughter of entire populations!

Lenin is the one who said:

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

Lenin went even further, unashamedly stating:

“We must utilise all possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth.” (“The Present Stage of Soviet Global Expansion,” U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies, p.29)

Terrorism, in the mind of Lenin, was a good and justified action, stating:

“… real, nation-wide terror, which reinvigorates the country.”

Lenin openly declared his genocidal bloodlust, casually talking about killing off nearly the entire Russian population to ensure the victory of communism:

“What does it matter if 90 percent of the Russian people perish, provided the surviving 10 percent bring about a World Revolution?” (Time Magazine – February 11, 1924)

Another Jewish Bolshevik leader, Grigory Zinoviev, “wrote off” 10,000,000 Slavs for slaughter, stating:

“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated.” (A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Great Britain: Foreign Office, (1919), p. 99)

I wonder why none of these atrocious Jewish quotes ended up in Jones’s documentary? I wonder why Jones never ever quotes the filth that can be found in the Talmud, Tanakh or Zohar (See: Judaism’s Strange Gods by Michael Hoffman II). I wonder why Jones never quotes the statements of Gentile-hating Jewish rabbis — like Ovadia Yosef and Manis Friedman — who have called for the annihilation and enslavement of non-Jews?

At the 13:12 mark of the documentary we see this graphic:

Oh, what a surprise! Alex Jones is a “true believer” in the epic fairy tale and quasi-religious cult known as the Holocaust™. He states as fact that the Nazis are responsible for 20,946,000 deaths between 1933-1945. Even mainline historians wouldn’t agree with that figure. It’s a steaming pile of “disinfowars” rubbish.

Do these people look “oppressed” to you?

In the years preceding WWII (1933-1939) the Nazis were not rounding people up by the thousands and shooting them the way the Jewish communists were in Russia, Ukraine, Hungary and elsewhere. Hitler wasn’t shooting anybody, including Jews. His SS troops were not raping or terrorizing anyone either. Video footage of everyday life inside Nazi Germany unveils a totally different picture to the one painted by official historiography disseminated in the schools. In it we see happy, jovial Germans — men, women, teenagers and children enjoying life, engaging in social activities, playing games, drinking beer, dancing and celebrating. You won’t be able to find film footage like that in the despotic Jew-run hell hole known as the Soviet Union — a genuine horror house of human misery. Nazi Germany hosted the summer Olympic Games in 1936 for Christ’s sake! Hitler’s Germany was a bastion of freedom, a magnificent society with a myriad of social advantages. The Nazis truly were ahead of their time.

Only after war was declared on Germany by Britain and France in 1939 did the Nazis step up their internal security efforts to enforce law and order. Only then did the Nazis begin interning perceived security threats and saboteurs, such as Jews, communists and other disloyal citizens, in concentration camps (which all the major powers involved in WW2 had). Only after the war against Germany commenced did the Nazis begin rounding up Jews and putting them in ghettos and labor camps. Only after war was declared on Germany by Britain and France — at the behest of International Jewry — did the Nazis become more harsh in their treatment of Jews, whose demonic kinsmen in Paris, Washington and London had instigated this bloody conflict to begin with, and who had been waging a relentless economic and propaganda war against Nazi Germany at the outset of Hitler’s assumption of power in 1933. After six years of intense Jewish agitation and aggression against Nazi Germany the Jews successfully drove two Western powers, as well as their colonies, into war against Germany, with the USA soon to follow. Joseph Goebbels, in a brilliant article he authored in 1943 entitled “The War and The Jews,” stated:

“Jewry wanted this war. Whether one looks to the plutocratic or the bolshevist side of the enemy camp, one sees Jews standing in the foreground as instigators, rabble-rousers and slave drivers. They organize the enemy’s war economy and encourage plans to exterminate and destroy the Axis powers. England and the USA recruit from among them bloodthirsty and vengeful agitators and political lunatics, and they are the source of the terror commissars of the GPU. They are the mortar that holds the enemy coalition together. In the National Socialist Reich, they see a power that resists their drive for world domination both militarily and intellectually. That explains their rage and deep hatred. Do not think that the Old Testament tirades of their newspapers and radio are merely political propaganda. They would carry it all out to the letter, should they have the opportunity.”

A testament to the truth behind Goebbels’ every word was a letter sent to the British PM Neville Chamberlain in 1939 by a leading Zionist figure named Chaim Weizmann — who would become Israel’s first president — in which he stated:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies.” (The Times, “Jews To Fight For Democracies,” September 6, 1939)

Hitler, like Goebbels, understood the reality of Jewish warmongering against the Reich and decided that the only solution to the Jewish problem in Europe was separation through forced deportation. Thus the Nazis drafted a four-year plan to deport four million European Jews to the island of Madagascar. Once settled there, the Jews would rule themselves but be kept under German surveillence as a means to keep their mischievous brethren in the United States in line. An article publshed in the St. Petersburg Times on August 8, 1940, quotes an SS spokesman as stating that if the Axis Powers were victorious in the war, all Jews will be forced to leave Europe afterwards:

“A German peace will mean a Jew-less peace, Das Schwarze Korps, mouth piece of Adolf Hitler’s elite SS guard, proclaimed yesterday.

Once the war is won, some area remote from Europe will be set apart for Jewish colonization, the paper said, and then the continent will be cleared entirely of Jews. …

Das Schwarze Korps’ discussion of a “peace without Jews” declared Jews had co-operated with Britain in an attempt to “convert all Europe into a chaotic, blood-soaked battlefield.” Therefore they must pay the bill, the paper said.

The German-Italian victory the paper explained, “will secure space far away from European labor and culture where the scum of humanity may try to lead a life of its own toil or die a death it earned.”

Now I will address the gargantuan falsehood perpetrated by Alex Jones in his documentary. He claims that the Nazis are responsible for the deaths of about 20,000,000 people between 1933 and 1945. Firstly, the Holocaust™ as we have been propagandized to believe it is a colossal fraud, a hoax of near planetary proportions. The legendary French holocaust revisionist, Robert Faurisson, succinctly summed up the Hoax in this short statement:

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”


The ridiculous fairy tale that exactly 6,000,000 Jews were killed in gas chambers and by other means by Hitler and his forces is already dead, even as far as the official story is concerned. Raul Hilberg, a Jewish supremacist who was considered to be the leading “expert” on the so-called Holocaust™ and preeminent author of exterminationist literature like “The Destruction of the European Jews,” admitted under oath in the kangaroo court of the first Zündel trial in 1985 that there is no scientific proof that Jews had been gassed and that there is not a single Nazi document to be found actually setting forth an order nor allocating a monetary budget for the extermination of Jewry (he actually had to revise an earlier edition of his book where he falsely claimed that there was a Hitler order). On the contrary, all the documents dealing with the Nazis’ solution of the Jewish question refer to emigration.

In 1990, the Auschwitz State Museum massively revised the death toll there from 4,000,000 to 1,000,000, a reduction of 3,000,000. For forty-five years following WWII, governments, historians, journalists, professors, etc, were — like parrots — repeating the fraudulent four million figure as fact, yet now they confess it was a giant lie! Would you really expect to find a swimming pool (fitted with a diving board), a soccer field, a cinema, a theater, a brothel, hospitals, a post-office, religious facilities, a sauna, an artist’s studio, kitchens, dental facilities, etc, in a perilous “death factory”? All of those things existed in the Auschwitz concentration camp complex.

Many more “official” reductions of the death figures at several of the major Nazi concentration camps have been made. For example, the lying Jews initially claimed that “2,000,000 people, mostly Jews” were “exterminated” in Mauthausen, a camp in Austria, but now claim only 14,000 Jews died there. It was originally claimed that 1,500,000 Jews were done to death in Majdanek, a camp in Poland. This figure was officially revised down to 79,000.

Included in Alex’s absurd 20,000,000 death figure most likely is the alleged “5,000,000 non-Jews” that the hoaxers claim also died at the hands of the Nazis. To debunk this assertion I will simply quote from one of the most prominent Holocaust™ hucksters out there — the ultra-Zionist Jewess Deborah Lipstadt:

“Why is Segev so forgiving of Simon Wiesenthal’s many lapses? Perhaps we can arrive at an answer by considering Wiesenthal’s most egregious distortion of the historical record and Segev’s response to it. In the 1970s, Wiesenthal began to refer to “eleven million victims” of the Holocaust, six million Jews and five million non-Jews, but the latter number had no basis in historical reality.

Wiesenthal’s contrived death toll, with its neat almost-symmetry, has become a widely accepted “fact.” Jimmy Carter’s Executive Order, which was the basis for the establishment of the US Holocaust Museum, referred to the “eleven million victims of the Holocaust.” I have been to many Yom Hashoah observances-including those sponsored by synagogues and Jewish communities-where eleven candles were lit. When I tell the organizers that they are engaged in historical revisionism, their reactions range from skepticism to outrage. Strangers have taken me to task in angry letters for focusing “only” on Jewish deaths and ignoring the five million others. When I explain that this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up, they become even more convinced of my ethnocentrism and inability to feel the pain of anyone but my own people.

When Israeli historians Yehuda Bauer and Yisrael Gutman challenged Wiesenthal on this point, he admitted that he had invented the figure of eleven million victims in order to stimulate interest in the Holocaust among non-Jews. He chose five million because it was almost, but not quite, as large as six million. When Elie Wiesel asked Wiesenthal who these supposed five million victims were, Wiesenthal exploded and accused him of suffering from “Judeocentrism.”” (Lipstadt, Deborah E. Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History. Jewish Review of Books)

So there you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. It turns out that the alleged “5,000,000 non-Jewish” victims of the Nazis were conjured out of thin air by the pathological liar, Simon “Nazi hunter” Wiesenthal, as a marketing ploy to stimulate non-Jewish interest in his bizarre gas chamber cult. A pure fiction!

When you tally all of those official reductions of HoloHoax deaths together — including the five million non-existent Gentile victims made up by Wiesenthal — you get 11,326,000 invented, conjured, mythical, fictional victims of the Nazis! Through decades of tedious research and intense study, Holocaust Revisionist scholars have determined that somewhere between 300,000 and 500,000 people — both Jews and Gentiles — perished in the Nazis’ labor and prison camps, largely due to malnutrition and disease that was a result, not of a Nazi extermination policy, but almost entirely due to the barbaric Allied saturation bombing of Germany and its supply lines which prevented key shipments of foodstuffs, medicines and other life-sustaining materials from making it to the camps.

Despite these monstrously over-inflated death figures being exposed as a farce decades ago, the magical “six million” figure bizarrely remains unchanged. That is because the six million figure has religious significance to Jews. Its origin is rooted in an ancient Torah prophecy that states 6,000,000 Jews first will perish in a fiery holocaust as a sacrifice to the tribal Jewish god Yahweh, before the Jews can make their gallant return to the “promised land” (Israel). (See: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism by Ben Weintraub and History & Scriptural Origins of the Six Million Number by John Bryant)

Indeed, the kabbalistic fable of “6,000,000 dead or dying Jews” has been the staple of Zionist propaganda campaigns dating back to the late 19th century. (See: The First Holocaust by Don Heddesheimer and The “Six Million” Myth) There are, in total, a staggering 147 references to “six million Jews” in the context of either being severely persecuted or in danger of being annihilated from 1900 through 1945. This clever propaganda was designed and disseminated by Zionist Jews — beginning shortly after the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897 — to elicit sympathy and support for the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine on the ashes of the indigenous Arabs, which was accomplished on the back of this disgusting Jewish Hoax™ in 1948. That’s why, in 1900, arch-Zionist Rabbi Stephen S. Wise proclaimed:

“There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” (“Rabbi Wise’s Address,” New York Times, 1900)

In addition to the astronomical fraudulence of the holocaust™ story, the Nazis have also been scapegoated for the bloodcurdling atrocities that the Soviet communists committed against their own people and the people of Eastern Europe during WWII. Of course, during WWII the Germans — surrounded by bloodthirsty enemies incited by the Talmudic hate of the Jewish commissars in the Kremlin and the Jewish propagandists in Hollywood — were fighting a war of racial survival. They killed their foes just as any soldier is trained to do in a war, and who could fault them for doing so? It was a chaotic bloodbath of obscene proportions. Millions upon millions of people were killed, on all sides. However, the Western media has, since the end of WWII, parroted the claim that 20,000,000 Russians were killed by the Axis Forces during the war. This turns out to be yet another mountainous sham.

In a groundbreaking book entitled “Stalin’s Secret War,” Russian historian Nikolai Tolstoy demonstrates that a majority of the Soviet citizens killed during the war were not the victims of Nazi forces but were, in fact, the victims of Stalin and his NKVD henchmen in his merciless campaign of ferocious violence and mass murder against his own population to keep them subdued and subservient to communist rule. Charles Lutton’s review of Stalin’s Secret War describes this dark reality as such:

“The “secret war” Tolstoy goes on to vividly describe was the fierce campaign Stalin waged against the Russian population – a struggle which often took priority over pressing military problems. For example, Stalin tied up much of the rail network in western Russia with slave trains of captives from the Baltic states, instead of devoting all rolling stock to the reinforcement of the frontlines. At L’Vov, where the Soviet 4th Army was fighting desperately to prevent its surrender, Stalin’s major concern was that the NKVD finish liquidating potential Ukrainian opponents of the regime rather than order the local security forces to join in the battle against advancing Axis units. While Stalin pleaded with the British to rush more aid and take further action, the NKVD labor camp guards were doubled in number from 500,000 to one million heavily armed men.

Standard treatments of this period always claim that the Soviet Union lost over 20 million people during the Second World War. Tolstoy makes a convincing case that the actual total is probably closer to 30 million, maybe even more — with about a third of these deaths attributable to Axis actions. The blame for as many as 23 million deaths is placed with Stalin and his NKVD henchmen.

Casualty figures for the Eastern Front have been estimated as follows: two and a half million German soldiers died in the East. It is believed that three Red Army men died for every German soldier killed. Of those 7,500,000 military deaths, approximately three million Russians died as POWs.

Tolstoy’s analysis of these statistics does much to revise our understanding of the war on the Eastern Front, as he demonstrates that these high Russian military casualties were largely due to the Soviets’ crude methods of waging war. “Penal battalions” composed of “enemies of the people” (i.e., inmates of prisons and camps, and luckless peasants, including women and children) were hurled in waves against German defensive positions. Frequently unarmed and at times deprived of camouflaged uniforms to better draw enemy fire, they were often used to clear minefields. With NKVD machine-gunners poised behind them, they were forced across minefields until a path was cleared. The wounded were killed off by the NKVD. General Ratov, chief of the Soviet Military Mission to Britain, actually declined an offer of British mine-detectors, remarking that “in the Soviet Union we use people.” SMERSH (from the initials “Death to Spies”), the NKVD’s special murder arm made famous by Ian Fleming in his James Bond thrillers, was created in 1942 as an additional guard on Soviet front-line troops. The NKVD placed large heavily-armed formations at the rear of Soviet units to discourage withdrawals and to pick off “stragglers” and “cowards.” In a number of instances, NKVD units fought pitched battles with Red Army detachments trying to retreat in the face of superior enemy forces. Stalin continued to purge his armed forces even as the Axis advanced. It is likely that hundreds of thousands of Russians were killed in such actions.

As for the POWs who died in German captivity, Tolstoy reminds the reader that the Soviet government refused to sign the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War, refused to cooperate with the International Red Cross (the Nazis allowed the Red Cross to visit concentration camps), and rebuffed German feelers forwarded through neutralist concerning compliance with the Hague Convention. A 1941 directive ordered Red Army men to commit suicide instead of surrender and Soviet law regarded Russian POWs as traitors. Besides their own “penal battalions,” the Russians occasionally used POWs to clear minefields.

German attitudes toward the Russians were further colored by evidence of NKVD massacres encountered at such places as L’Vov, Vinnitsa, and Katyn. They found not just piles of corpses, but apparently mass-produced torture instruments, including devices for squeezing the skull, another for the testicles, and tools used to skin prisoners alive. Ice picks, broken bottles, or whatever else was handy or preferred were also used. Tolstoy observes that “Soviet cruelty far outstripped that of National Socialism. . . . Torture in the USSR was (and is) employed on a mass scale as an important punitive means of overawing a resentful population.” He goes on to explain that these ghastly scenes of state-sanctioned depravity “confirmed the German view that Bolshevik Russia was irredeemably savage and backward.” Considering how civilians and POWs were treated by the Communists, the Germans felt no obligation to show much consideration for Russian POWs. According to the author, there was a purpose behind all of this cruelty:

Stalin went out of his way to invite Nazi ill-treatment and later extermination of Russian prisoners-of-war. . . . It is quite clear, therefore, that the deaths of over three million Russians in German custody was a piece of deliberate Soviet policy, the aim of which was to cause the liquidation of men regarded automatically as political traitors, whilst directing the anger of the Soviet people against the perpetrators of the crime. . . . It should not be forgotten, either, that Soviet cruelty greatly prolonged the conflict, costing all belligerent nations millions of lives. . . . This evidence of how the Soviets treated their own people, coupled with the harsh treatment they visited on prisoners-of-war, was the major cause of Germany’s obstinate determination to fight on to the end, long after it had become clear her cause was doomed.”

Having accounted for the 7½ million military casualties, Tolstoy states that four million Russian civilians were killed by the Germans (although this includes those involved in anti-Partisan operations, military sieges of such cities as Leningrad, and 750,000 Jews). This leaves 18-20 million additional Russians killed in the course of Stalin’s “secret war” against his own subjects.” (Lutton, Charles. Book Review — Stalin’s War: Victims and Accomplices, Journal of Historial Review)

The Germans, on the other hand, could be said to have been the most humane participants in the bloodbath that was the Second World War. In Michael Walsh’s study of Allied war crimes, he informs us:

By contrast the German armed forces behaved impeccably towards their prisoners-of-war. “The most amazing thing about the atrocities in this war is that there have been so few of them. I have come up against few instances where the Germans have not treated prisoners according to the rules, and respected the Red Cross” reported respected newspaper The Progressive February, 4th 1945.

Allan Wood, London Correspondent of the London Express agreed. “The Germans even in their greatest moments of despair obeyed the Convention in most respects. True it is that there were front line atrocities – passions run high up there – but they were incidents, not practices, and misadministration of their American prison camps was very uncommon.” Lieutenant Newton L. Marguiles echoed his words.

US Assistant Judge Advocate, Jefferson Barracks, April 27th 1945. “It is true that the Reich exacted forced labour from foreign workers, but it is also true that, they were for the most part paid and fed well.”

“I think some of the persons found themselves better off than at any time in their lives before,” added Dr. James K. Pollack, Allied Military Government. “What did the Germans do to get efficient production from forced labour that we were not able to do with Germans working down the mines? They fed their help and fed them well.” Said Max H. Forester, Chief of AMG’s Coal and Mining Division in July 1946.”

Does anyone honestly believe that Alex Jones is just ill-informed or “unaware” of these irrefutable and salient facts exonerating the Germans of crimes that they never committed? Don’t be naive. Alex knows all about holocaust revisionism, and many people have called into his show to confront him on it. He is not merely a loud-mouthed ignoramus, he is deliberately withholding these truths from his followers and radio audience.

Does Alex Jones truly believe that the “New World Order” is a Nazi conspiracy and that Adolf Hitler is its progenitor? Please, don’t kid yourself. That narrative is so nonsensical, so perposterous and outrageous, that even a certified paranoid schizophrenic would scoff upon hearing it. Alex Jones doesn’t actually believe his own rhetoric about Hitler and the “Nazi NWO.” He is paid in shekel to broadcast these egregious lies for Jewry!

Besides the evidence, facts and information already illustrated herein demonstrating the illogicality and maliciously fallacious nature of Alex Jones’ anti-Hitler smears, one single article from the Jewish-owned propaganda newspaper, The New York Times, is enough to utterly demolish Alex’s bald-faced lies about a Nazi-led NWO. In an article dated October 6, 1940, titled “New World Order Pledged To Jews,” we are informed of a vocal pledge made by Arthur Greenwood, a member of the British War Cabinet during WWII:

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of “justice and peace.”

Mr. Greenwood, who is deputy leader of the British Labor Party, declared that in the new world the “conscience of civilized humanity would demand that the wrongs suffered by the Jewish people in so many countries should be righted.”

He added that after the war an opportunity would be given to Jews everywhere to make a “distinctive and constructive contribution” in the rebuilding of the world.” (“NEW WORLD ORDER PLEDGED TO JEWS.” New York Times. 06 Oct, 1940.)

In addition to the astonishing statements made by a top British official advocating the establishment of a Jewish-led New World Order immediately following WWII, I present a quote from a Jewish freemason from the B’nai B’rith Canada (a secret Jewish-Masonic society):

“Memory of the Holocaust is central to the new world order. … Achieving our quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” (Ian J. Kagedan. Toronto Star. November 26, 1991)

This brazen statement is essentially a confession that the holocaust™ fiction Westerners have been inundated and inoculated with following the end of the Second World War in 1945 will be utilized as a vehicle for Jewish power and world domination.

In an amazing display of abject candor, Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, handed us all the proof that is even necessary to demonstrate the reality of the Jewish quest for world domination. In 1962, Ben-Gurion openly declared that a world government ruled by the Jews from Jerusalem would soon be formed, and that this was predicted by the genocidal Jewish Old Testament “prophet,” Isaiah. He said:

“With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” (David Ben-Gurion and Amram Duchovny. David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words. Fleet Press Corp., 1969, p. 116; also quoted in Look Magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)

All of this incredibly incriminating material illustrating that it is International Jewry — not Hitler and the Nazis — who are the criminal masterminds behind the globalist New World Order agenda is, of course, completely overlooked and rejected by the Jewish apologist Alex Jones. Nary a mention does he make to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the modern incarnation of the ancient Jewish plan for world domination first iterated some 2,500 years ago in the Jewish Bible (Tanakh). The fundamental position of the Jewish religion has always been one of ethnic supremacy, asserting that the Jews are an “elite,” an “elect,” the “chosen people of God” who are destined to rule the earth and destined to exterminate and enslave their non-Jewish adversaries — i.e. the “inferior Goyim.”

In Isaiah 61:5-6 it states: “Aliens will shepherd your flocks; foreigners will work your fields and vineyards. And you will be called priests of the Lord, you will be named ministers of our God. You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches you will boast.”

In Isaiah 49:23 it says: “Kings will be your foster fathers, and their queens your nursing mothers. They will bow down before you with their faces to the ground; they will lick the dust at your feet.”

Isaiah 60:12 announces: “For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly ruined.”

This is what awaits us all in the hellish nightmare of a “Jewish Utopia” on earth. You have been forewarned! Now, the only question is: what are you going to do to put a stop to this madness?

Plus d’infos:

La secte de Jonestown

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste des Rothschild

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Gordon Duff décline l’invitation de la révisionniste Carolyn Yeager, sous prétexte qu’elle ne connaît pas la « connexion Bush-nazis » (connexion qui n’a jamais existé!)

Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

L’homme qui se dit « le juif le plus riche du monde », Sheldon Adelson, donnera « tout ce qu’il faudra » pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama

 


Sheldon Adelson reportedly has said he will donate « whatever it takes » to defeat President Obama  – JTA

Après avoir financé Newt Gingrich à coups de dizaines de millions, il finance maintenant Mitt Romney, le candidat de Lady Lynn Rothschild. Tout pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama.

Sheldon Adelson gave a pro-Mitt Romney super-PAC $10 million – JTA

Adelson’s Pro-Romney Donations Will Be ‘Limitless,’ Could Top $100M

Mitt Romney met with Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino magnate who took aim at Romney’s presidential campaign by substantially backing challenger Newt Gingrich.

Romney says he will do the ‘opposite’ of Obama on Israel – JTA

La politique israélienne de Mitt Romney sera contraire aux actions d’Obama

Most Israelis think Romney would be ‘friendlier’

L’ANTISEMITE (Barack Obama)

‘Obama’s Attitude Towards Pollard Proves His Anti-Semitism’

Republicans: Israelis first to see Obama faults–Ari Fleischer says Israelis lack of support for Obama was harbinger of reduced US Jewish support for Obama.

Romney aide to Haaretz: After he’s elected, Iran will see there’s a new sheriff in town

Ron Paul Supporters Are Really Pissed That Rand Paul Endorsed Mitt Romney

America Last: Will Zionist Pressure Force Rand to Rewrite Ron’s America-First Foreign Policy?

Romney’s post-Tish’a B’Av faux pas, Sheldon Adelson’s ‘tainted money’ Romney’s embattled Israel fundraiser Even before landing in Israel as part of a foreign trip that includes Britain,…

Zionist casino mogul Sheldon Adelson rocks Israeli media

NYTIMES: What Sheldon Adelson Wants

TUT Pod-Broadcast June 18, 2012

Romney would to the ‘exact opposite’ as Obama when it comes to Israel.

Mark Dankof joins the program to discuss this and other relevant items.

Download Here

See online:

<iframe width= »420″ height= »315″ src= »http://www.youtube.com/embed/kVAj35q2Vzo » frameborder= »0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

 

The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

June 26, 2012   AFP

Sheldon Adelson: The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

By Michael Collins Piper

Those who want to see Barack Obama out of the White House have a tough, no-holds-barred ally in Las Vegas-and Israel-based billionaire gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson, who some call “the modern-day Meyer Lansky,” recalling the longtime head of the national crime syndicate.

The New York Times reported on June 17 that Adelson—a key ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is himself a close, longtime friend of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney—has said he is prepared to spend $100M of his own money this year to defeat Obama and help elect Republicans.

SHELDON ADELSON & LYNN DE ROTHSCHILD
Two of the big names working to oust Obama

Adelson’s friend Fred Zeidman—a prominent figure in the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and a major player in the GOP in Texas—told the Times that Adelson is “fully committed to beating Barack Obama,” adding that the $100M Adelson is willing to spend is “a meaningless amount of money” to super-rich Adelson.

Reportedly worth some $25B, Adelson once referred to himself as “the richest Jew in the world.”

This past year, the American-born gambling chief and his Israeli wife gave $20M to a so-called superPAC supporting the presidential ambitions of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who loudly echoed Adelson’s hard-line support for Israel.

A superPAC refers to a new breed of political action committee that was spawned from an infamous 2010 Supreme Court ruling, which allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections. With federal election law loopholes in place, superPACs can avoid disclosing the names of their contributors. But unlike regular PACs, superPACs cannot donate funds directly to politicians. What they do is hire propagandists, and spend their millions buying commercials on television and placing advertisements in newspapers backing one politician over another.

Now the casino kingpin is going all out to make sure the GOP not only take theWhite House but also Congress, leading the Times to refer to Adelson’s “growing role as one of the country’s leading political financiers”—referring to Adelson’s clout here in America, rather than to his equally considerable impact in Israel.

Adelson has not only pledged an additional $10M to a superPAC supporting Mitt Romney but he has also dropped $5M into the  coffers of the Congressional Leadership Fund, a superPAC that supports GOP candidates for Congress.

And it has been reported that Adelson has given even more millions to other superPACs, some $5M going to Young Guns, a front for Rep. Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who shares Adelson’s devotion to Israel, as well as $10M to the Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies run by GOP operative Karl Rove. He has even talked of handing $10M to fellow billionaires Charles and David Koch, key figures behind the tea party movement, to assist in their pro-GOP endeavors.

If Adelson lives up to his promises, this is just the start.

Adelson joins Lady Lynn Forrester de Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a member of the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in lining up behind Romney, another of the big names who says “Obama must go.”

Recently, Leslie Gelb, the former president of the CFR, complained to writer Edward Klein, author of the new book The Amateur (highly critical of Obama) that no president had taken more personal control over foreign policy than Obama. Klein quoted Gelb as having stated:

“This is an Obama-centric decision-making operation. In other administrations, a lot of decisions were made below the presidential level. But Obama shapes most policies. He takes pen to paper and writes decision papers. Usually presidents have other things to do than sit down and write a document that takes an inordinate amount of time. But Obama makes the calls on most every subject and with a degree of personal intensity.”

Klein suggests that Obama’s policies—especially his stance toward Israel—are “a rupture with the past” betraying the bipartisan consensus forged on foreign policy issues and carried out by officials in Republican and Democratic administrations alike.

That Klein is also taking on Obama may spell a public relations danger to the president.

Klein has been a key figure in three of the most powerful Zionist media dynasties: He was editor-in chief of The New York Times Magazine, published by the Sulzberger family; former foreign editor of Newsweek, published by the Meyer-Graham family (of Washington Post fame); and is the author of the “Walter Scott” column in the weekly Parade, owned by S.I. Newhouse, who famously saved then-Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) from election defeat by cutting off “Jewish lobby” money to Helms’s opponent, after which Helms became fervently pro-Israeli.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

No More No-Win Wars
• Is Obama the reason we haven’t attacked Iran?

By Willis A. Carto
There are many things that an alert American may criticize President Barack Obama for, but these failings are not the subject of this commentary. Instead, we wish to congratulate him for his surprising statesmanship and guts for resisting the Israeli lobby in a matter of vital national interest.
No one may doubt that what Israel wants, Israel gets. It is estimated by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, the authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, that Israel has received more than $140 billion in financial and other benefits from U.S. taxpayers since 1949. And yet, in spite of this proof of Israel’s political power in this “democracy,” President Obama has so far rejected Israel’s efforts to do the one thing that Israel craves above everything else—to attack Iran.
Israel-firsters (and by the use of this term the Judeo-Christians under the sway of such racketeers as John Hagee must be included) claim Iran is an existential threat to Israel. At any moment, they fear, Iran will lob hundreds of missiles at the poor Israelis. Iran must be stopped before it’s too late.
And Israel must have the full cooperation—monetary as well as military—of the United States to forestall or avenge this fate.
But here’s the rub. Has Obama turned a deaf ear to the Israel-firsters? Could he be cognizant of the advice of this country’s Founding Father, George Washington and the other God-inspired men who created this nation, to avoid foreign wars? Could Obama actually be rejecting the internationalists, such as Mitt Romney, John McCain, Joe Lieberman and other war maniacs and acting in the best interests of America, and damn the industrialists, bankers and lunatics who want perpetual war for America?
Could Obama realize that an American attack on Iran—even if Israel could procure the consent of Congress—would be a strategic disaster for this nation no matter if endorsed by multitudes of TV talking heads and scribblers who can be counted to bark obediently every time Israel gives the signal?
Such an attack would beyond question constitute the greatest no-win war yet for our country.
Such an attack would mean bombing Tehran and other Iranian cities with nuclear warheads. This would be a major atrocity and war crime. We would kill many thousands of Persians but only an invasion by infantry wins wars, and deploying a minimum of 15 million infantrymen (not girls and fairies) along with sufficient tanks, cannon, rockets, airplanes, ammunition and materiel to do the
job would be impossible, as would be our Navy  aking control of the Persian Gulf.
An attempted invasion of Iran would be the greatest favor we could possibly do for Russia and China. U.S. embarrassment at the outcome of such an ill-conceived venture would follow, and Russia and China could be counted on to rub it in on the international stage. Goodbye, American prestige and all the billions the taxpayers have contributed for the past 50 years to make people love us. 
——
Willis A. Carto is a longtime nationalist writer and editor, who has also published hundreds of books of interest to populists. He was the founder of LIBERTY LOBBY and is currently the editor of THE BARNES REVIEW (TBR) history magazine. If you’ve never seen TBR, write P.O. Box 15877,Washington, D.C. 20003 for a free sample issue.

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

May 28, 2012   AFP

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

Conservatives, radicals, centrists, birthers, Zionists join to challenge president

By Michael Collins Piper

Barack Obama’s fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of his biggest critics, one of the world’s richest, most powerful women—Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London—has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed “centrist” third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35M in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild—the American-born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right—had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP’s nominee.

While AE postured as a “grass-roots” effort to break partisan gridlock in America, the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—of which she is a member—had set AE in motion in the first place.

The intent of such a centrist party at the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles.

While Lady de Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman—a fervent internationalist—for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19—while both promoting Huntsman’s aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE’s centrist party efforts—Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew.

Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which, at that point, was still not assured.

On Jan. 13, the Post—owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschilds—reported Lady de Rothschild’s endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as “a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle.”

Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrist third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.

Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too “ideological” (that is, too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschilds’ golden boy.

As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild’s worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010, writing on the Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.” Accusing Obama of being “beholden to the left,” Lady de Rothschild said he had “misled” the American people during the 2008 campaign about his “real plans for America.” She added that “his cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives.”

In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrist movement—along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populist and nationalist challenger from GOP ranks.

As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at The Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party—representing what she called “the radical center”—would “take on all the vested interests and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington.”

Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschilds, the “birther” movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hardline Zionists, as well as many self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives” and others—are joining behind Romney—long seen as a “moderate” and “centrist” and even as a “liberal”—to put Obama out of the White House.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

 

 

 

‘American Exceptionalism’ Just More NWO Rhetoric

  By Michael Collins Piper

During the 2012 election campaign, you’ll probably be hearing a lot about “American exceptionalism,” particularly from the Republican presidential candidates. Newt Gingrich has made the concept a centerpiece of his campaign, and Gingrich’s wife—the current one, that is—has produced a documentary on the topic. Mitt Romney’s campaign book is entitled No Apology: The Case for American Greatness. Sarah Palin’s book, America by Heart, has a chapter entitled “America the Exceptional.” And former Sen. Rick Santorum and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty have also been heard touting the topic.

But don’t be fooled by rhetoric that has a lot of patriotic appeal. In fact, the concept of American exceptionalism— and a related theme known as national greatness conservatism—are really modern-day propaganda masks for old-fashioned Trotskyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism now wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government.

Many call it the New World Order. The wizards who conjured up these themes are three key figures in the so-called neo-conservative movement:

(read the rest…)

 

 

 

 

Plus d’infos:

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

Sheldon Adelson: « je suis le juif le plus riche au monde »

Le père du PNAC William Kristol prédit que Joe Lieberman sera nommé secrétaire d’État par l’administration Romney

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d’un journal juif américain, soutient qu’il ne prônait pas vraiment l’assassinat d’Obama

Selon Frank J. Gaffney (PNAC), les Frères Musulmans ont infiltré et contrôlent l’administration Obama

Le mouvement des Birthers ou Quand les Patriotes font le travail de Netanyahou…

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Le père du PNAC William Kristol prédit que Joe Lieberman sera nommé secrétaire d’État par l’administration Romney

 

Kristol: Lieberman will be Secretary of State in Romney Administration

By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
May 19, 2012

On Tuesday at Manhattan’s B’nai Jeshurun Synagogue during a debate with J Street founder and President Jeremy Ben-Ami, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol predicted that the next U.S. Secretary of State in a Romney administration would be Senator Joe Lieberman.

Although Kristol is typically wrong in his rosy predictions about the outcome of the many wars of “Muslim liberation” in which he has advocated American involvement, he is far more reliable when it comes to forecasting GOP political appointments. On June 30, 2008, Kristol confidently predicted on Fox News that Senator John McCain would select Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate. Kristol had discovered the then Alaska governor a year earlier, when a cruise hosted by The Weekly Standard set anchor in Juneau, and from then on relentlessly promoted her in the media and to the McCain campaign.

If Kristol’s latest prediction comes true, a Romney presidency would put U.S. foreign policy even more firmly under the control of a foreign power. As Mark Vogel, chairman of the largest pro-Israel Political Action Committee (PAC), once said:

Joe Lieberman, without exception, no conditions … is the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in Congress. There is nobody who does more on behalf of Israel than Joe Lieberman.

As for what Lieberman has done for the people he is supposed to represent, I wrote in “Guess Who Wants to Kill the Internet?“:

It would be hard to think of anyone who has done more to undermine American freedoms than Joseph Lieberman. Since 9/11, the Independent senator from Connecticut has introduced a raft of legislation in the name of the “global war on terror” which has steadily eroded constitutional rights. If the United States looks increasingly like a police state, Senator Lieberman has to take much of the credit for it.

 

A Vote for Romney is a Vote for Israel

By Philip Giraldi
The Passionate Attachment
May 23, 2012

There are some strange things going on relating to US foreign policy and Israel that you will not see in the mainstream media. A recent Rasmussen poll suggests that most Americans (53%) are closer to Ron Paul on the need to get out of Afghanistan immediately than they are to the views of either Obama or Romney, who respectively prefer a long somewhat disingenuous disengagement and continuing the war until, improbably, all terrorists are dead. But in spite of their popularity, Ron Paul’s views will be invisible in November’s election.
At the same time, even though Paul is genuinely out of the running for president, his campaign has clearly built up a grassroots presence at state and local levels that will be difficult for the Republican National Committee to deny unless it resorts to extensive vote-rigging or mass exclusion of freely elected representatives. Both are quite possible and have already been employed at local levels to isolate Paul. Nearly all of the activists now entering government support Paul’s call for an end to foreign aid, which is, of course, anathema to Israel and its friends.

 

Meanwhile over at the Tea Parties, there is roughly a fifty-fifty split over issues like Israel. Some support the Israel connection as part of the chest-thumping desire for an assertive US response to the rest of the world (the Sarah Palin wing) while those who are serious about fiscal and government downsizing recognize that Israel is part of the problem, supporting the two Pauls. How this will play out over the next two years is anyone’s guess, but the whole issue of Israel and its relationship with the US is now on the table.

How the Israel Lobby will react to the dilemma is unclear. Neocon Cheshire cat Bill Kristol’s prediction that his buddy Joe Lieberman will become Secretary of State in a Romney administration would solve the problem as continuing aid to Israel, in one form or another, would be untouched. The aid might well be rolled into the annual Defense budget, already accomplished with the Iron Dome supplement for 2013-4, as Eric Cantor has already proposed as a permanent solution. But the Tea Party/Paul pressure on bloated budgets and foreign aid conceptually will not go away and you can be sure that AIPAC will be working hard to distinguish assistance to our good friend and faithful ally Israel from all other foreign entitlements. And also working hard to elect Romney, a foreign policy parvenu, who has surrounded himself with neocon advisers including John Bolton, Robert Kagan and Dan Senor.

Philip Giraldi is the executive director of the Council for the National Interest and a recognized authority on international security and counterterrorism issues.

 

 

AMERICAN FREE PRESS

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

May 28, 2012   AFP
Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

Conservatives, radicals, centrists, birthers, Zionists join to challenge president

By Michael Collins Piper


Barack Obama’s fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of his biggest critics, one of the world’s richest, most powerful women—Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London—has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed “centrist” third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35M in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild—the American-born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right—had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP’s nominee.

While AE postured as a “grass-roots” effort to break partisan gridlock in America, the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—of which she is a member—had set AE in motion in the first place.

The intent of such a centrist party at the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles.

While Lady de Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman—a fervent internationalist—for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19—while both promoting Huntsman’s aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE’s centrist party efforts—Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew.

Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which, at that point, was still not assured.

On Jan. 13, the Post—owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschilds—reported Lady de Rothschild’s endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as “a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle.”

Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrist third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.

Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too “ideological” (that is, too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschilds’ golden boy.

As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild’s worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010, writing on the Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.” Accusing Obama of being “beholden to the left,” Lady de Rothschild said he had “misled” the American people during the 2008 campaign about his “real plans for America.” She added that “his cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives.”

In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrist movement—along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populist and nationalist challenger from GOP ranks.

As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at The Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party—representing what she called “the radical center”—would “take on all the vested interests and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington.”

Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschilds, the “birther” movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hardline Zionists, as well as many self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives” and others—are joining behind Romney—long seen as a “moderate” and “centrist” and even as a “liberal”—to put Obama out of the White House.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:.

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

Netanyahu Ties to Romney

The Intel Hub
By Shepard Ambellas
April 8, 2012

The next presidential election is approaching as the candidates are beating each other to a pulp in the battlefield known as the political arena. So far it has been your typical down and dirty race as we are starting to see some pre positioning by certain power structures in control.

What we do know at this time is that Barrack Obama is heavily funded, signifying a clear choice by the powers that be that he will most likely be installed for a second term against the American peoples votes and wishes as voter fraud and electronic ballots have been known to sway results.

In fact Obama’s funding topped $172 million dollars back in January compared to Mitt Romney’s $72 million and some change, not counting what he had left over from the previous election.

However, it has now came out in a recent piece by the New York Times that presidential candidate Mitt Romney has ties to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dating back as far as 1976, and has recently received a personal phone call from Netanyahu.

The article details the fact that there is more to the relationship than a mere friendship and how it could raise a few eyebrows.

A New York Times article excerpt reads;

The relationship between Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Romney — nurtured over meals in Boston, New York and Jerusalem, strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies — has resulted in an unusually frank exchange of advice and insights on topics like politics, economics and the Middle East.

When Mr. Romney was the governor of Massachusetts, Mr. Netanyahu offered him firsthand pointers on how to shrink the size of government.

When Mr. Netanyahu wanted to encourage pension funds to divest from businesses tied to Iran, Mr. Romney counseled him on which American officials to meet with. And when Mr. Romney first ran for president, Mr. Netanyahu presciently asked him whether he thought Newt Gingrich would ever jump into the race.

The article also details how Israel would nearly have decision making capabilities if Romney was elected reading;

Mr. Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.

This is a clear indicator that Netanyahu might use Romney as a puppet if he is elected president although Obama looks as if he is set to become president via overfunding by the globalists.

 

Mitt and Bibi Joined at the Hip

By Philip Giraldi
The Passionate Attachment
April 12, 2012

One of the more outrageous articles to appear recently describes how likely Republican Party presidential nominee Mitt Romney and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enjoy a close personal relationship based on their simultaneous employment at the Boston Consulting Group in 1976. The article also explains how that relationship has continued, with Netanyahu briefing Romney on the subject of Iran before the March Super Tuesday primaries. Earlier, in December, Romney criticized Newt Gingrich over a comment about Palestinians, asserting that “Before I made a statement of that nature, I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say ‘Would it help if I say this? What would you like me to do?’”

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Romney is handing the exercise of US foreign policy on the Middle East over to Israel. And it also doesn’t take any particular insight to realize that if a foreign head of state is advising a presidential candidate on foreign policy in any context it is completely unacceptable interference in the domestic politics of the United States. So why isn’t the media screaming in outrage? Well, the usual reason: that Israel is untouchable.

As loathsome as Obama has been in his craven surrender to Israeli interests, there has always been to the saving grace that one knows deep down that the president despises Netanyahu even as he fears him and the power of the Israel Lobby. Not so with Mitt, who will be an enthusiastic puppet in whatever game the Israelis decide to play.

Philip Giraldi is the executive director of the Council for the National Interest and a recognized authority on international security and counterterrorism issues.

 

 

Organized Jewry, The Inciter of Global War and Genocide


War is a Jewish racket

by ZionCrimeFactory

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, we have been fed a crock of Jewish/Zionist dung-heap about the Second World War. Our governments, beholden to Jewish money and political influence, have been peddling fantasy stories as “truth”, fairy tales as “fact”, and preposterous fables as “history”, for seventy years straight. Our criminal governments have been lying to us and manipulating us into fighting senseless, catastrophic wars with the sole purpose of vanquishing the enemies of International Jewry, and thus paving the path for the Jewish takeover of the entire planet.

WWII — A Bloodbath For Jewish Benefit

It is a very difficult thing for Americans, Canadians, Brits, Australians, Frenchmen, and other Westerners, to come to terms with the fact that i) WWII was a senseless bloodbath that served no purpose other than to benefit the Jewish Power Elite in various ways, ii) that we were fighting on the wrong side, and iii) Hitler was right about everything. Call it pride, cognitive dissonance, or some combination of both — nobody likes to admit they were hoodwinked.

Jews fired the first shot in 1933.

Despite popular belief, WWII did not start in September of 1939 with the British and French declaration of war against Germany; it actually started in 1933. In 1933, organized Jewry initiated a subversive economic war against Germany; a boycott of German goods designed to weaken and destroy Hitler’s National Socialist government.  The March 24, 1933, edition of England’s Daily Express newspaper ran the headline “Judea Declares War on Germany“. The article reported: “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.”

International Jewry formally declared its “holy war” against Germany long before Hitler began restricting the rights of Germany’s Jews. Jewry’s war declaration against Germany was issued by Samuel Untermeyer of the World Jewish Federation who said, in the New York Times of 7 Aug. 1933, that it would be means of an “economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.” The Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940, quoted Rabbi Maurice L. Perlzweig of the World Jewish Congress telling a Canadian audience that “the World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years.” The Jewish desire for war was admitted to by Rabbi Felix Mendelsohn in the Chicago “Sentinel” of 8 Oct. 1942 where he states: “The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” 

Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934 (also quoted in “Histoire de l’Armée Allemande” by Jacques Benoist-Mechin, Vol. IV, p. 303) said: “For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” In Les Nouvelles Litterairres, February 10, 1940, Schalom Asch is quoted as saying: “Even if we Jews are not physically at your side in the trenches, we are morally with you. This war is our war and you fight it with us.”

Chaim Weizmann, the late chairman of the World Zionist Organization and first president of Israel, made clear the genocidal Jewish intention to destroy Germany. In a letter to British PM Winston Churchill dated September 10, 1941, Weizmann spoke about how the Jews of the United States pulled the nation into the first World War, and he promised they could do it again, given that Britain fulfilled Zionist demands regarding Palestine. Weizmann wrote: “It has been routinely acknowledged by British statesman that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it — and may do it — again.” In a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York, Weizmann stated: “We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.”

The 24 July, 1942, edition of the American Hebrew Magazine made it plainly clear who brought America into the war when it declared that “whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur’s men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: the real reason that boy went to his death was because Hitler’s anti-semitic movement succeeded in Germany.”

Further proof Jews were behind the push for war on both sides of the Atlantic came in the form of a diary entry made by James Forrestal, who later became U.S. Secretary of Defense in the Truman administration. In his diary of 27 Dec. 1945 Forrestal notes that he played golf with Joseph Kennedy (father of JFK), FDR’s ambassador to Britain, who told him that ex-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain “stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into war.” In 1949, Forrestal was fired by President Truman and within two months was murdered (ruled a “suicide”) for his opposition to Zionism and the nascent state of Israel.

Likewise, Roosevelt was guided into the war by Jews. On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role in shaping American foreign policy. His secret reports said such things as:

“The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful …

… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe.

…the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.

In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations.

The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda which is under Jewish influence…

…Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press.”

Roosevelt was surrounded by Jew advisers — rabid anti-German hatemongers and warmongers of the worst sort — such as Bernard Baruch, S. I. Rosenman, Sidney Weinburg, Sidney Hillman, Henry Morgenthau Jr., and Felix Frankfurter.

As Dr. Stephen Sniegoski points out in his book review of The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State:

“Jews also played a significant role in getting the United States into World War II to destroy their Nazi nemesis. And they worked actively to undermine popular noninterventionist resistance to war. For example, the Anti-Defamation League “employed investigative agents who secretly penetrated isolationist and anti-Semitic organizations and collected potentially damaging or incriminating information” which it turned over to the FBI and other federal agencies. (p. 110) Ginsberg does not develop this point, but given the fact that the overwhelming majority of “isolationists” were not enemy agents and were simply exercising their constitutional right to oppose a policy, it is apparent that activist American Jews have been quite willing to crush the civil liberties of others in order to advance their own goals. Jews also played a critical part in turning the media toward a prowar stance. (That was quite an achievement, since the American mood in the 1930s was strongly antiwar and “isolationist.”) In Hollywood, Jewish film makers concentrated on producing anti-Nazi propaganda films to prepare the masses for a crusade against evil.”

So, as has been clearly demonstrated, WWII was provoked by Jews and the blame for this catastrophic bloodbath of sixty million human beings lays squarely at the feet of International Jewry. Hitler did not start the war nor did he want war. To the contrary, Hitler made it clear that he was opposed to such a war, having witnessed first hand the hell of the first catastrophic world war. In 1945 Hitler stated: “It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.”

In fact, Jew lackey British PM Winston Churchill — who was a self-professed Zionist, a warmonger, a terrorist, and mass murderer –  flatly rejected peace offers from Hitler in 1939, 1940 and 1941. When Hitler’s number two man, Rudolf Hess, made his miraculous flight to Britain (having to crash land in Scotland) in 1941 to make peace and end the war, Churchill had him arrested and imprisoned for life. Undeniably it was the Jews, and their puppet politicians in America, France and Britain, who wanted war, and did everything they could to instigate and then prolong it.

(…)This is a classic case of Jewish psychological projection, considering that it has always been the chief objective of the Jewish religion to rule the earth and acquire all earthly treasures and possessions; thereby making all Gentiles into subservient slaves to the Jews. It is the Jews, not the Germans, who desire world domination, as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have made perfectly clear. Not only is Jewish world dominion elucidated in the Protocols (which have undoubtedly proven to be authentic, despite endless Jewish kvetching to the contrary) but in all ancient Judaic religious texts — the Torah, Talmud, books of the Zohar and Kaballah. Prominent Jewish rabbis from Israel are quite open about their sinister desire to murder and enslave non-Jews.

The Zionist Hand Behind Middle-East Wars

Zionist butcher, Ariel Sharon, puppeteered America’s military forces like a marrionette to crush his enemies.

The genocidal destruction that has rained down on the middle-east for the past decade was launched at the behest of a small cadre of conniving Jewish-Zionist ideologues who call themselves “neoconservatives.” The brainchild of three Jewish Communists (“Trotskyites”) Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz and Leo Strauss, neoconservatism is — and has always been — a Jewish movement, led by Zionist motivations and for Zionist gain.

An article written by Gal Beckerman in the Jewish daily news magazine, The Forward, opined: “Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War (with extra points if it’s Pat Buchanan doing the acknowledging). But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. It’s a thought one imagines most American Jews, overwhelmingly liberal, will find horrifying. And yet it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants’ grandchildren.

Jewish political scientist, Benjamin Ginsberg, acknowledged that neoconservatism was essentially a product of Jewish tribalism: “One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right’s hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel’s security.”

Irving Kristol, the Jewish “godfather” of the neoconservative movement let slip the Israeli-centric agenda of his nefarious ideology when, in 1973, he stated: “Senator McGovern is very sincere when he says that he will try to cut the military budget by 30%. And this is to drive a knife in the heart of Israel… Jews don’t like big military budgets. But it is now in the interests of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States… American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.”

Fellow neoconservative godfather Norman Podhoretz has made similar statements about using American military prowess to protect Israel. Leo Strauss, also a Jewish Zionist and early neocon “intellectual,” advocated the perpetual deception of the public by those in power for a “greater good.” This “greater good” that he spoke of was what was good for the Jews, not the Gentiles among whom they live. Noam Chomsky has argued that Strauss’s theory is a form of Leninism, in which society should be led by a group of elite vanguards, whose job is to protect liberal society against the dangers of excessive individualism, and creating inspiring myths to make the masses believe that they are fighting against anti-democratic and anti-liberal forces. Journalists, such as Seymour Hersh, have opined that Strauss endorsed noble lies, “myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive society.”

Jewish neocon genocidists like to speak in public about “global crusades for democracy,” but this is just a clever ruse to deceive the “Goyim” about their real agenda which is to bolster the hegemonic status of Israel in the middle-east ensemble. The Jew William Kristol (son of Irving Kristol), editor of the Weekly Standard, explained the real reason for the disingenuous rhetoric about global democracy to the Jerusalem Post (27th July 2000): “I’ve always thought it was best for Israel for the US to be generally engaged and generally strong, and then the commitment to Israel follows from a general foreign policy.”

Neocon godfather Leo Strauss trained his Jewish-Zionist « pupils » in the art of subversion and the perpetual deception of American « Goyim ».

Two of Leo Stauss’s more notable protégé’s were none other than Jewish Iraq war architect, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Shulsky. Shulsky was the Jewish Straussian who was appointed head of the Office of Special Plans by fellow Jewish neocon Douglas Feith (then Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in the Pentagon). This office supplied the major portion of the fraudulent “intelligence” that was used by the Bush administration to justify the war against Iraq. It has been proven that the Zionist propaganda entity embedded within the Pentagon, the Office of Special Plans, worked closely with Israel to cook up the “Iraq WMD threat to America” hoax.

The phony “threat” of Iraq possessing or attempting to possess and wield “weapons of mass destruction” was cunningly contrived by Israel and its vast network of Jewish “sayanim” operatives in America who formed a tight conglomeration of neoconservative “think tanks”, such as the Project for a New American Century, American Enterprise Institute, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, among many others, who were behind all of the propaganda, conjecture and lies that led to the disastrous Zionist proxy war to behead the Iraqi nation for Israel’s benefit in 2003.

Israel’s sayanim operatives had also burrowed their way into the top echelons of the Bush Administration and the Pentagon — namely Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Eliot Abrams, Abram Shulsky, Lewis Libby, Ari Fleischer, David Frum, Eliot Cohen, Joshua Bolten, Marc Grossman and many others — thus enabling these inhuman Zionist war-hawks to set US foreign policy at the drop of a dime. In fact, the Bush Administration was infested with dual Israeli-American citizens; forty-two of them to be exact. Many of these Jews had extensive links to the Jewish-Israeli lobby (AIPAC, AJC, ADL, ZOA, etc) and to the Sharon regime in Israel.

It’s not exactly a secret that the neocons are mostly Jews whose loyalty lies with the Zionist state, not America. Ari Shavit, a writer for Israel’s Haaretz Daily News Service, proudly proclaimed that:

“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.”

It’s incredible to see some people still trying to deny this.

This lunatic Zionist agenda for mid-east destruction goes back much further than many people realize. In 1996, a militarist Israeli “thank tank” called the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), authored a policy paper for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister, the crazed Arab-hating war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm“. Within this damnable Zionist strategy paper we find the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi Ba’athist regime being advocated as an “important Israeli strategic objective”, as well as calls for the toppling of the governments of Iran and Syria. Their grand strategy was aimed at replacing the governments of these countries with Israel-friendly stooges. Three of the authors of this warmongering paper were none other than Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser — all of whom became top ranking members of the Bush Administration in 2001 eagerly pushing for an American war with Iraq. The Clean Break paper was essentially a continuation of an earlier proposal by Zionist extremist Oded Yinon called “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s” (published in 1982). Yinon wickedly suggested that the Arab States should be destroyed from within by exploiting their internal religious and ethnic tensions. These cold-blooded Israeli Geo-political strategists envisioned that by weakening Israel’s external enemies they could thereby weaken Israel’s internal enemies, i.e. the native Palestinians.

Some of the subversive Jews behind the Iraq War.

The ultra-militaristic Project for a New American Century group — which many people suggest was the prime mover in shaping the post-9/11 American-led war agenda in the middle-east — was essentially an offshoot of the Israeli IASPS, and was headed by Jewish neocon heavyweights William Kristol and Robert Kagan. In one of the group’s deranged “studies” in September of 2000, PNAC released a report entitled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century”, which called for a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to galvanize the American masses behind illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and a broader war against the entire Arab/Muslim world. It chillingly stated, “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic catalyzing event — like a New Pearl Harbor.” At least half the members of the PNAC group were Jewish. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and the American Enterprise Institute were also instrumental in the deceptive propaganda campaign that led to the war in Iraq. Both groups were Jewish-financed and run operations.

Another important piece to this Zionist puzzle is the Jonathan Institute, a maniacal Zionist “think tank” set up in 1979 by former and current Israeli prime minister’s Menachem Begin (terrorist/mass murderer, former head of the Irgun) and Benjamin Netanyahu. This group of Israeli terror planners held a series of conferences throughout the 1980s and derived its name from Bibi Netanyahu’s late brother Jonathan Netanyahu, who was killed in the Israeli raid on Entebbe airport in Uganda in the 1970s. This coterie of Zionist crooks endeavored to promote their genocidal fantasies of a “clash of civilizations” between the West and Israel’s Arab/Islamic adversaries and also effectively publicized their desire for Western powers to adopt their espoused doctrine of “preemptive retaliation,” the Israeli policy of killing those designated as “terrorists” before they can act. Begin, Netanyahu and other international Jewish terror masters, attempted to seduce Western leaders to join their sadistic effort to fragment and destabilize the middle-east so as to make it safer for Israel and ripe for Israeli plundering.

Zionist parasite Netanyahu, the architect of 9/11 and the global « war on terror » crusade of Zionist mayhem and chaos.

Netanyahu published a book in 1986 entitled, Terrorism: How the West Can Win, which was a collection of essays from himself and like-minded Zionist gangsters who harbored grandiose dreams of the annihilation of Arabs and Muslims who get in the way of the Likud Party’s strategic objectives. Netanyahu’s book basically lays out the frame-work for what is now generally known as the “war on terror”, and contains all of the vocabulary and discourse that didn’t enter our lexicon until after the suspicious events of 9/11. This book is undoubtedly a key piece of evidence that the “war on terror” is a Zionist-engineered scam for global Jewish hegemony.

The Jewish Neocons — who had been lurking over capital hill like hawks for decades, running their sleazy Zionist propaganda outfit magazines and periodicals such as The Weekly Standard and The New Republic — had for years been unsuccessful in their ceaseless pursuit to drag America into another war in the middle-east, following the first Persian-Gulf war in 1991. Nobody was buying their lies that Iraq posed an imminent danger to America. But that all changed on September 11, 2001.

The catalyst for this current state of perpetual warfare between the West and Israel’s Islamic enemies was, of course, 9/11; the “new pearl harbor” event that the PNAC Zionists had been lusting for to realize their wet-dreams of endless warfare.

Pitting the West against the Islamic Middle-East in a prolonged battle was something that Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak and the then Israeli PM Ariel Sharon publicly called for within an hour of the terrorist spectacle that struck America on that fateful day; a testament to the true authors of the day’s horrific events. An event that Benjamin Netanyahu mockingly proclaimed was a “good thing for Israel … will bring immediate sympathy [for Israel's cause].” An event that genocidaire, Ariel Sharon, dubbed Israel’s “Hanukkah miracle.” An event which Israeli political analyst Ehud Sprinzak candidly described as “the most important public relations act ever committed” in favor of the Jews and Israel.

Of course, for those of us who have actually studied the subject of 9/11, we know who the real perpetrators were. The former head of Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service (Hamid Gul), the 25 year German SPD parliamentarian and author of several books on the secret operations of intelligence agencies (Andreas Von Bulow), the former President of Italy (Francesco Cossiga), as well as the former director of studies of the US Army War College (Dr. Alan Sabrosky), all unanimously concur that the Israeli Mossad conducted 9/11 as a false-flag attack to kick-start this long-planned “clash of civilizations” that Zionists had been so zealously lobbying for, for decades.

(For more information about the Jewish origins and Zionist machinations of the neoconservative movement that engineered the Iraq War, see Michael Collins Piper’s book, The High Priests of War, and Dr. Stephen Sniegoski’s book, The Transparent Cabal. Also recommended are the two excellent documentaries, “War By Deception” and “Missing Links“, which comprehensively expose the Zionist cabal behind 9/11 and the 9/11 wars.)

Jewish Neocons and the HoloHoax

Talmudic crybaby whiners use the HoloHoax guilt-trip routine as a smokescreen for criminal activity.

There is an interesting connection between Jewish neoconservatism and the fictitious ‘Holocaust’ religion. The Jewish Mafia’s preposterous anti-German conspiracy theory — known to the world as The Holocaust™ — is central to neoconservative thinking.

Jewish journalist Gal Beckerman had this to say about the motivations of Jewish neoconservatives:

“It was Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous vic-tory.” By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good for the Jews?”

Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations” on anitisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.”

As that article demonstrates, one of the main motivating factors behind the policies advocated by neoconservative ideologues was protecting the Jews from “another holocaust.” Of course, what this article won’t tell you is that the alleged ‘holocaust’ of Jews during WWII did not, and could not have scientifically, mathematically, possibly ever occurred. Nor did any of the dozens of other “holocausts” or “imminent holocausts” of “six million Jews” that Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Communist propagandists had been incessantly promoting in the press dating back to the late 19th century.

Interestingly, the main Zionist architect of the savage Iraq War, Paul Wolfowitz, was heavily influenced by the fraudulent mythology of Holocaustianity. According to Shelemyahu Zacks, Paul Wolfowitz’ father, Jacob Wolfowitz, “fought … for the liberation of Soviet Jewry. He was a friend and strong supporter of the state of Israel, AIPAC member and had many friends and admirers there.” Paul Wolfowitz’s wikipedia article asserts that he was, “Strongly influenced by his father, Paul Wolfowitz became “a soft-spoken former aspiring-mathematician-turned-policymaker … [whose] world views … were forged by family history and in the halls of academia rather than in the jungles of Vietnam or the corridors of Congress … [His father] … escaped Poland after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust.” Wolfowitz may have lost some family in WWII, as did tens of millions of other people, but his relatives certainly didn’t die in a “homicidal gas chamber” because such claims are a tissue of fabrication.

Wikipedia tells us that Wolfowitz read about the HoloHoax and Hiroshima as a boy and calls them “the polar horrors”. Speaking of the influence of the HoloHoax on his views, Wolfowitz said: “That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views … It’s a very bad thing when people exterminate other people [except, of course, when Jews exterminate Palestinians or when Allied troops exterminated Germans or when Jewish Communists exterminated Russians and Ukrainians or when American troops exterminate Arabs and Muslims on behalf of Israel -- ZCF], and people persecute minorities. It doesn’t mean you can prevent every such incident in the world, but it’s also a mistake to dismiss that sort of concern as merely humanitarian and not related to real interest.”

Another key architect of the Iraq War, sleazeball Zionist genocidist Richard Perle, is seen in this BBC documentary titled “The War Party”, saying how the HoloHoax has shaped his worldview and is essentially the motivating factor that drives his insidious warmongering on behalf of Israel. At the 16:49 mark of the video, Perle says: “the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.”

It is supremely axiomatic that the “big lie” of “Iraqi WMD” that was used to justify the war against Iraq was conjured up by, in essence, the same caliber of cunning Jew propagandists that conned the world into believing in the “big lie” of “German WMD” (the gas-chambers myth). The shared mindset of people like Perle, Wolfowitz, and other Jewish neocons, is that the HoloHoax justifies Israel’s existence, it justifies US support for Israel, and it justifies endless wars against Arab/Muslim nations for Israel’s “security.”

Little children are mesmerized by HoloHoax propaganda films from the outset of their childhood. No wonder they believe this crap.

The Zionist-trumpeted myth of ‘Iraqi WMD’ has been dismantled and is believed by very few people today (with the possible exception of Sean Hannity). However, the myth of ‘German WMD’ (gas-chambers lie) is still very much believed by the majority of the mind-controlled Western populace, because that propaganda has been so relentless and intensively force-fed to people since a young age. Not only that, but it is actually illegal to challenge the claims of the HoloHoax in a dozen countries in Europe — no wonder so many people believe it, in many countries they are forced to by law! Europeans who bravely refuse to blindly accept and adhere to the conformist dogma of this hoax run the risk of heavy fines and even imprisonment! Truth doesn’t need laws to protect it from scrutiny, but lies do.

Once the holocaust myth is finally dismembered on a wide scale, then all of the fraudulent justifications Jewish Neocons give to generate support for Israel and global Jewry in all of their villainous endeavors, will collapse like a house of cards.

The First Gulf War, Atrocity Propaganda and the HoloHoax

Zionists Steven Solarz and Tom Lantos masterminded the push for American intervention in the first Persian-Gulf war using lies and deceit.

There is also an interesting correlation between the first Gulf War, atrocity propaganda and the HoloHoax.

The late American-Jewish congressman Tom Lantos, a Hungarian “HoloHoax survivor” and rabid Zionist, was the mastermind behind another series of atrocity lies which led the US down the path of endless wars in the middle-east on behalf of Israel. Tom Lantos’ Congressional Human Rights Caucus held a hearing after the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in 1991. Lantos’ Human Rights Caucus presented “(lie)witnesses” who spoke about alleged atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait. It was revealed months after this hearing successfully pushed America into the first Gulf War, that the whole thing was a scripted hoax! The entire saga was concocted with the help of the public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton.

The testimony that clinched the war resolution that barely passed in the Senate in a 52-47 vote, was delivered by a young Kuwaiti girl who appeared anonymous at the hearing, known to the public only as “Nayirah”. She claimed to have witnessed Iraqi troops come into a Kuwaiti hospital with guns, who then proceeded to remove dozens of babies from their incubators — stole the incubators — and left the babies to die on the cold floor. This never happened. “Nayirah” spoke perfect American English (likely lived in the US her whole life) and turned out to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. This disgraceful and corrupt young woman was nothing less than a paid actor, coached in the art of deception, who tearfully recited a rehearsed pro-war propaganda script prepared for her by her Zionist paymasters. This hoax atrocity story was widely publicized by mainstream media outlets and Kuwaiti officials repeated these lies at the United Nations in their campaign to elicit Western intervention in their struggle with Saddam Hussein.

The “Kuwaiti incubators hoax” essentially provided the casus belli for American intervention in the first Gulf War. Evidently, child atrocity stories are an effective pro-war propaganda tool because of their ability to garner anger from the public, which is why Jews are so fond of telling grotesque tall tales of Nazis ripping babies in half with their bare hands. Is it any surprise that Lantos (being the experienced liar that he is) was one of the highlighted stars of Steven Spielberg’s Holocaust Hoax documentary, “The Last Days”? A counter-documentary which exposes the lies of Spielberg’s hate film was released earlier this year titled “The Last Days of the Big Lie“; I encourage everyone to watch it.

Zionists attempted second twentieth century « gas chambers » hoax in 1991; this time maligning Iraqis with this ridiculous ‘blood libel’. Click to enlarge.

It is hardly surprising that during the first Zionist-contrived Gulf War deceitful Jews laughably attempted to resurrect the WWII “homicidal gas chambers” myth and project it onto Iraq. The New York based Jewish Press, then calling itself “the largest independent Anglo-Jewish weekly newspaper,” wrote on its title page on February 21, 1991: “IRAQIS HAVE GAS CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS” The front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles and distributed in 381,065 copies, was: “GERMANS PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”

Nobody took those claims seriously, and they obviously weren’t true. But it illustrates the reckless disregard Jews have for historical truth and accuracy. Time and time again we see mendacious Jews carelessly trying to elicit sympathy from the public using lies, even resorting to resurrecting past false propaganda narratives to malign their new enemies (the Arabs and Muslims) with. It’s been over 60 years since WWII, you’d think these scoundrels would have come up with some new lies and slanders by now. It seems that any time the Jews want to demonize someone they march up to the old “attic of Jewry” where they keep all the atrocity propaganda albums and highlight reels, lift off the shelf the first ancient Aggadah fable they can find, dust it off, and use it once again. If it doesn’t work the first time, they try again and again until it finally sticks. I guess the Jews aren’t as sophisticated as some might think.

Conclusion

Countless times, non-Jews — mesmerized by subversive propaganda — have been duped into going to war against the Jews’ enemies. Unmistakeably, the main tool of the Jew to accomplish his sinister ends is the power of propaganda and mass persuasion through atrocity lies. The television and news-media is their greatest weapon because with those elements under their firm control they are able to shape what the public thinks and feels; thereby shaping what people do. Multitudinous millions of Gentiles have fought, killed and died in wars instigated by International Jewry, aided and abetted by Gentile pawns and stooges who sell out their own people for short-term monetary gain and political power.

Ostensibly, the Jews have attained their current position as global hegemon and world dictator through the instigation of wars and revolutions — pitting Gentiles against Gentiles. As we are busy killing each other, the Jews merrily count their shekels all the way to the bank. In the end, it is people’s innate naivety, as well as their susceptibility to be deceived and misled by emotive atrocity stories, that affords the Jews a smooth ride to world supremacy. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late. Either accept the truth now, and inform others about it, or face slavery!

Share

 

 

Sur ce blog:

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

AL QAÏDA ET ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

John McCain, Joe Lieberman et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur… 

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

McCain et Lieberman: « bombardez la Libye! »

Le croisé anti-terrorisme Lieberman lié à un groupe pro-terrorisme

‘A CLEAN BREAK’, le modèle du PNAC: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Une comique juive au parlement israélien: je ne voulais pas heurter la mémoire de la Shoah en dénonçant le cancer de l’immigration africaine en Israël

Raisonnement typique.

Israeli MK: I didn’t mean to shame Holocaust by calling African migrants a ‘cancer’

Miri Regev - Tomer Appelbaum - May 21, 2012

ed note–typical Jewish mindset. She is not worried about how her remarks are considered abusive and racist against those against whom they were directed. Rather, she is worried that her comments will somehow do shame to the memory of Jewish suffering, real or imagined.
And these people continue to wonder why they are/have been hated throughout history.
Likud MK Miri Regev, who came under fire last week after calling African migrants “a cancer” in Israeli society, apologized for the first time for her comments on Sunday, opting, however, to leave the migrants out of her apology.

Regev’s controversial comments came during a violent rally staged by residents of Tel Aviv’s south – where many African migrants live – to protest rising crime rates in the area. In the rally, the Likud MK said “the Sudanese are a cancer in our body.”

She was later criticized for inflaming the protesters, with angry demonstrators later going on to attack African passers-by and journalists, breaking into and looting shops associated with the African migrant community and shattering car windshields.

At the time, Regev condemned “any violence from any side, but I understand the rage and hurt of the residents, of the families that live there. They tell us: ‘Help us. We are being humiliated, look how we live, we are afraid to leave the house.’”

However, speaking to Israeli media outlets over the weekend and on Sunday, Regev chose to apologize for calling the Sudanese a cancer, opting however, to direct her apology to Holocaust survivors and cancer patients.

“When I compared the migrant worker phenomenon to cancer I was referring to the way the phenomenon had spread, and not anything else. If anyone took it otherwise and was consequently offended, I apologize and I surely did not intend to hurt either Holocaust survivors or cancer patients,” she said.

Regev told Maariv that she was very “attuned to the issue of the Holocaust. The memory of the Holocaust is seared deeply into my heart back from my time in high school when I prepared a paper on the subject.”

“Up until a year ago I did not set foot in Germany, and made it a point not to purchase German-made products,” the Likud MK and former army spokesperson said, adding: “When I was with an IDF delegation in Auschwitz I didn’t stop crying, and so if someone attributed a wrong interpretation of my comments or was offended by them, I apologize.”

Regev added that “she didn’t talk about people as being cancer but of an infiltration phenomenon that was spreading.”

The Likud MK also added that she was sensitive to the feelings of cancer patients, adding that she was herself involved with the care given to a boy with cancer, telling the website of Israeli daily Maariv that she understands the emotions involved with ta mention of the disease.

“When [former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin] said the settlers were a cancer, no one made any fuss. When [Peace Now head] Yariv Oppenheimer speaks of the settlements as caner, everyone is silent. When I talk about the phenomenon, I get attacked just became I’m a leader from the right-wing,” Regev added.

Last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised that his government would address the issue of African migrants in Israel, one day after a protest against them by residents of south Tel Aviv turned violent.

“The infiltrator problem must be solved, and we will solve it,” Netanyahu said on Thursday afternoon, speaking at an event in Tel Aviv.

He also refered to the construction of a fence on the Egypt-Israel border, saying, “We will complete construction of the fence within two months, and soon we will begin sending infiltrators back to their countries of origin.”

The prime minister also condemned the actions of demonstrators and Knesset members on Wednesday, when demonstrators attacked African migrants in South Tel Aviv.

“I want to make it clear that there is no place for the statements and actions that we witnessed yesterday. I say these things to the public figures and to the residents of south Tel Aviv, whose pain I understand,” he said.

 

 

VIDEO – Aucune preuve de chambre à gaz à Nuremberg
VIDEO – La malhonnêteté des historiens officiels, pt1, pt2

 

Sur ce blog:

Pourquoi Zundel aime tant les États-Unis: un constitutionnaliste conservateur rejette la version officielle de la Seconde Guerre mondiale

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d’un journal juif américain, soutient qu’il ne prônait pas vraiment l’assassinat d’Obama

Le racisme permis : le racisme israélien

 

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Rabbi Yosef: il est interdit de soigner un non-Juif le jour du Shabbat

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef

 

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0%2c7340%2cL-4229767%2c00.html

Rabbi Yosef: Treating gentiles violates Sabbath

Shas’ leader says religious physicians cannot violate Sabbath in order to save gentiles’ lives, but offers halachic solution to avoid legal repercussions

Ynet

05.17.12, 13:36 / Israel Jewish SceneWhat should religious doctors do if a gentile is injured in a car accident on Shabbat and is rushed to the hospital? According to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, this does not warrant violating the sanctity of the Sabbath.

During a class on Sabbath halacha relating to religious physicians, the spiritual leader of Shas said that while doctors are expected to do everything in their power – even if it requires violating the Sabbath – in order to save Jews whose lives are in danger, the same does not apply for gentiles.

« If a gentile were to get injured in a car accident during Sabbath, and he is brought to the hospital – Israel must not treat him, » he said, explaining that « if the particular procedures come from rabbis (de-rabbanan), then they might be permitted, but if they stem from prohibitions in the Torah (de-’oraita), then they are not allowed, as the Torah forbids to violate the Sabbath for gentiles. »

Rabbi Yosef expounded on the problem, saying that the Mishnah Berurah explicitly says that « all religious physicians who treat gentiles on the Sabbath or violating the Sabbath; however, in reality the patients are brought to the hospital and must be treated. The doctors’ license says they must treat all patients without distinction of faith or race, and if they don’t, the State could revoke their license and also punish them. So what should the poor doctors do? »

The rabbi offered a halachic solution that follows a rule by which if a single person is doing the act, he is violating the Sabbath, while if two people are doing it together, they are exempt.

« The doctor who needs to operate will call on another doctor, or nurse, to hold the scalpel together and make the incision, » said Rabbi Yosef, saying that « it is necessary in order for religious physicians to refrain from being put on trial for distinguishing between a Jew and a gentile on Sabbath. »

 

judeologie.com :

Racisme juif: «ne violez pas les règles du Shabbat pour sauver la vie d’un goy»

Article d’Asher Zeiger, dans The Time of Israel, le 17 Mai 2012

Le rabbin Ovadia Yosef avec le président de l’entité sioniste Shimon Peres

Donnant récemment une leçon sur les lois du Shabbat, le rabbin Ovadia Yossef, chef spirituel du parti Shas et ancien grand rabbin séfarade  a déclaré que les lois concernant la violation du Shabbat sont différentes selon que l’on a affaire à un «gentil»( ndlr: goy, non-juif, bref un sous-homme) ou a juif quand il s’agit de sauver une vie.
Yosef, qui a 91 ans, a dit dans la leçon qui a été enregistrée par ses adhérents, que parce que la Torah nous enseigne que ses lois sont pour nous pour «vivre par elles et non pour mourir par elles», le sauvetage d’une vie l’emporte sur toutes les lois de la Torah, mais seulement quand la vie est celle d’un Juif. Il a dit que la Torah ne permet pas la profanation du Shabbat pour sauver la vie d’un gentil.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/ovadia-yosef-speaks-against-sabbath-desecration-to-save-non-jewish-lives/

(lire le reste…)

 

 
La justice israélienne renonce à poursuivre les auteurs d’un ouvrage jugé raciste

 

Sur ce blog:

Le racisme permis: le racisme israélien

Selon le Grand rabbin orthodoxe sépharade Ovadia Yosef, « les Gentils n’existent que pour servir les Juifs »

 

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

DÉMÉNAGEMENT DE CE BLOG Dû AUX NOUVELLES LOIS CONTRE LA HAINE SUR INTERNET

 

 

La loi omnibus sur le crime C-10 (reprenant le contenu des lois c-50, c-51 et c-52) a été adoptée sous bâillon ce soir par le parlement canadien à majorité conservatrice du gouvernement philosémite de Stephen Harper.

 

L’évolution du projet de loi C-10:

Harper assimile l’attentat de Mumbai à un acte antisémite (13 mars 2009)

Discours du Premier ministre Harper rendant hommage aux victimes des attaques terroristes de Mumbai devant les Chabad Loubavitch  (12 mars 2009)

Harper reaffirms Tory support for state of Israel–Prime Minister Stephen Harper holds a prayer book given to him by Rabbi Mendel Kaplan, left, during the grand opening of the Ernest Manson Lubavitch Centre in Thornhill, Ontario on Thursday, The speech comes amid the government’s refusal to allow British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, apparently because of links to Hamas. (March 26, 2009)

PMO hires 2 former White House staff to boost Canada’s profile in U.S. Mike McCurry — who served as press secretary to former U.S. president Bill Clinton — and Ari Fleischer [NEOCON JEW], who held the same role under former president George W. Bush, have been hired to boost Canada’s profile in the U.S., said Kory Teneycke, the communications director for the PMO. (April 16, 2009)

Justice : Harper veut permettre aux victimes de poursuivre les terroristes L’avocat de Toronto Aaron Blumenfeld, qui oeuvre au sein de la Canadian Coalition Against Terror, a affirmé que les familles des victimes canadiennes d’attaques terroristes réclament depuis longtemps une telle loi. (31 mai 2009)

Canadian Jewish Congress to give Prime Minister Stephen Harper a human-rights award (31 mai 2009)

Prime Minister Harper Receives Saul Hayes Human Rights Award / Le Premier ministre Harper reçoit le prix Saul-Hayes des droits de la personne (31 mai 2009)

Canada to allow terror trials PM Harper says proposed bill to permit lawsuits against terror groups, acts of anti-Semitism (June 1, 2009)

Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust education Creation of task force marks 70th anniversary of Canada’s rejection of Jewish refugees (June 1, 2009)

PM pledges law to let terror victims sue Victims of terrorism could soon have the right to sue anyone who commits a terrorist act or anyone who funds terrorism, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told members of the Canadian Jewish Congress Sunday. (June 2, 2009)

B’nai Brith Canada applauds Government anti-terrorism initiative (June 2, 2009)

Le ministre de la Sécurité publique annonce le dépôt d’un nouveau projet de loi visant à permettre aux victimes d’actes terroristes d’intenter des poursuites contre les auteurs de ces actes……et ceux qui les soutiennent « Le sénateur David Tkachuk (AGENT SIONISTE) est un grand défenseur des victimes d’actes terroristes. En déposant ce projet de loi aujourd’hui, je lui rends hommage pour les efforts qu’il a déployé à cet égard », a ajouté le ministre Van Loan.(2 juin 2009)

Une loi pour poursuivre les terroristes Dimanche, à Toronto, à l’occasion d’une rencontre du Congrès juif canadien, le premier ministre Harper a affirmé que cette loi enverrait un message clair aux terroristes et à leurs commanditaires: le Canada les tient juridiquement responsables de leurs actes. (2 juin 2009)

Terrorisme: milliards fictifs pour les victimes Ottawa a copié une loi américaine inéquitable et difficilement applicable (3 juin 2009)

2012: Loi omnibus sur le crime C-10

  • la Loi sur la justice pour les victimes d’actes de terrorisme (ancien projet de loi S-7), qui vise à permettre aux victimes de terrorisme de poursuivre les auteurs d’actes terroristes et ceux qui les soutiennent, y compris les États étrangers visés, pour les pertes ou les dommages subis à la suite d’un acte de terrorisme commis n’importe où dans le monde;
Tuesday, April 10

Un-Free Speech From Canada–Criticizing Israel is Anti-Semitic

Nearly two years after the first hearings were held in Ottawa, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition fto Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) released a detailed report on July 7 that found that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Canada, especially on university campuses.
While the CPCCA’s final report does contain some cases of real anti-Semitism, the committee has provided little evidence that anti-Semitism has actually increased in Canada in recent years. Instead, it has focused a disproportionate amount of effort and resources on what it calls a so-called « new anti-Semitism »: criticism of Israel.
Indeed, the real purpose of the CPCCA coalition seems to be to stifle critiques of Israeli policy and disrupt pro-Palestinian solidarity organizing in Canada, including, most notably, Israeli Apartheid Week events. Many of the CPCCA’s findings, therefore, must be rejected as both an attack on freedom of speech and freedom of protest, and as recklessly undermining the fight against real instances of anti-Semitism.
The CPCCA and its findings
The Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) was born out of a conference held in London in February 2009 by the Inter-Parliamentary Committee for Combating Anti-Semitism. Formed in March 2009 and not directly linked to the Canadian government, or to any NGO or advocacy group, the CPCCA included 22 Canadian Parliament members from across party lines. Former Liberal MP Mario Silva chaired the Inquiry Panel and Conservative MP Scott Reid led the Steering Committee.
Between November 2009 and January 2010, the CPCCA held ten separate hearings during which time representatives of various non-governmental organizations, religious institutions, police departments and Canadian and Israeli universities presented papers meant to assess the level of anti-Semitism in Canada. While groups critical of Israel were denied the chance to address the committee, major Zionist organizations like B’nai Brith Canada, Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, and the Canadian Jewish Congress were welcomed.
« Much of today’s anti-Semitism manifests in anti-Israel agitation around boycotts, divestment and sanctions, » said Avi Benlolo, President and CEO of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, during a hearing in November 2009. « It deploys an unfair double standard against the Jewish state, singling out of Israel alone for one-sided, harsh criticism and calls for punitive actions. »
Throughout the consultation process, the CPCCA regularly focused on Canadian university campuses, which were routinely described as hotbeds of anti-Semitism, where Jewish students or students with pro-Israel leanings are often intimidated and threatened. This accusation was made repeatedly, and included in the CPCCA’s final report, despite the fact that Dr. Fred Lowy, President Emeritus of Concordia University in Montreal, stated in his address to the CPCCA that, « by and large, Canadian campuses are safe and are not hotbeds of anti-Semitism of any kind ».
In its final report, the CPCCA made about two dozen recommendations on how best to fight anti-Semitism in Canada. While the report states that « criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is wrong », it also found that « singling Israel out for selective condemnation and opprobrium … is discriminatory and hateful » and many of its recommendations deal with combating this « new anti-Semitism ».
A major recommendation issued by the CPCCA was that the Canadian government should promote the working definition of anti-Semitism used by The European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). This definition categorizes « applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation » as anti-Semitic.
In other words, the CPCCA is supporting a definition whereby individuals who focus their attention on Israeli human rights violations, yet don’t level an equal amount of condemnation on other states for their human rights violations, can be labeled as anti-Semitic. This is obviously problematic since Palestine solidarity activists - like any other people – have commitments that make it impossible to engage with every issue they are otherwise interested in. They shouldn’t be labeled as anti-Semitic due to their inability to participate in every single human rights struggle happening around the world.
Another dangerous recommendation made by the CPCCA was that Canadian university administrators should condemn « discourse, events and speakers which are untrue, harmful, or not in the interest of academic discourse, including Israeli Apartheid Week ». Even the use of the word « apartheid » in relation to Israel is anti-Semitic, the CPCCA found, since it amounts to the « denial of the Jewish people their right to self- determination … by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor ».
This clearly violates freedom of speech and an open exchange of ideas at Canadian universities, and also unfairly and inaccurate labels Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) as anti-Semitic. In reality, IAW has since 2005 brought together respected activists, academics, journalists and cultural figures from around the world, including Judith Butler, Ronnie Kasrils, Noam Chomsky and Ali Abunimah, among others, to openly discuss ideas related to Israel/Palestine.
IAW provides an educational space for understanding Israel’s apartheid policies - as evidenced, for example, through the separate legal systems used by Israelis and Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank or the discriminatory land ownership laws operating inside Israel - and supports the growing campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), which aims to non-violently pressure Israel to respect international law. It is far from the « uniformly well-organized, aggressive [campaign] designed to make the Jewish state and its supporters pariahs » the CPCCA report makes it out to be.
The CPCCA also recommended that the Canadian Committee of Foreign Affairs undertake a study on the United Nations Human Rights Council, « particularly regarding its over-emphasis of alleged human rights abuses by Israel, while ignoring flagrant human rights abuses of other member states ».
This clearly demonstrates how the committee has confounded anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel, and is prepared to levy dubious suspicions against UN bodies and tarnish Canada’s international standing in the process.
In a statement released on July 8, Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), said that the CPCCA’s recommendations, « if implemented, will inhibit public discussion of Israel’s conduct ».
« CJPME believes that conclusions and recommendations generated by a process in which the same body – the CPCCA - is prosecutor, jury, and judge, are not credible. Although a few of the witnesses recounted incidents that were indeed indicative of genuine anti-Semitism, many were complaining about merely being exposed to criticism of the Israel’s conduct, » the CJPME press release stated.
Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) Canada also criticized the committee, stating that « the CPCCA’s goal is to criminalize criticism of Israel and Zionism, not to hold impartial hearings. Therefore, we oppose the CPCCA as an ideologically biased organization with an agenda that will harm free speech and human rights activity in Canada. We oppose the CPCCA’s Orwellian distortion of anti-Semitism. It is a danger to both Canadian liberties and to the genuine and necessary fight against anti-Semitism. »
Reflection of official Canadian policy
While labeling critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic is nothing new, the level at which this accusation is now being used in Canadian discourse must be seen as a reflection of the Canadian government’s official and current policy on the Middle East.
« When Israel, the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack, is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation, I believe we are morally obligated to take a stand.  Demonization, double standards, de-legitimization, the three D’s, it is the responsibility of us all to stand up to them, » Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in 2010 at the Ottawa Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism, which was supported by the CPCCA.  Harper added:
« Harnessing disparate anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel, as the source of injustice and conflict in the world and uses, perversely, the language of human rights to do so. We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is. »
Under Harper, Canada has routinely defended Israeli intransigence and disregard for international law and the human rights of the Palestinian people under its control. In return, trade cooperation and military and security technologies ties have been strengthened between the two states.
In May of this year, it was reported that Harper was adamantly opposed to making any reference to the 1967 borders in a G8 summit statement calling for renewed Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Far-right Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman thanked Harper for his position, and stated, « Canada is a true friend of Israel ».
In 2010, Canada announced it would discontinue its financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the organization that provides support and resources to approximately 4.7m registered Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territories, and funnel the money into greater policing and security institutions run by the un-elected and corrupt Palestinian Authority leadership instead.
In January 2009, as the Israeli army continued its disproportionate attack on the besieged civilian population in Gaza that left 1,400 Palestinians dead in the span of three weeks, Canada was the only country out of 47 that voted against a motion at the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning the Israeli violence.
In addition to providing diplomatic cover for Israel, the Canadian government has attacked and cut funding to various non-governmental organizations working on issues related to Israel/Palestine, including Kairos Churches and Alternatives International.
Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney, who led the formation of the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) and is an ex-officio member, has also repeatedly alleged that the Canadian Arab Federation promotes anti-Semitism and hatred. While Kenney never backed up these claims, the Canadian Arab Federation’s contracts with the government - which helped finance language programs for Toronto-area immigrants (the majority of whom are of Chinese origin) - were not renewed in 2009.
Undermining the fight against real anti-Semitism
Anti-Semitism, like all other forms of racism, is appalling and must be strongly and unequivocally condemned.
But by defining legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and pro-Palestinian activism in Canada as anti-Semitic, the CPCCA is not only threatening free speech and freedom of protest, but it is undermining the fight against real cases of anti-Semitism and weakening the seriousness with which such cases should be dealt.
This is something that Canadians, and people everywhere, should be adamantly against.
Jillian Kestler-D’Amours is a Canadian freelance journalist based in Jerusalem. She regularly contributes to The Electronic Intifada, Inter-Press Service and Free Speech Radio News. More of her work can be found athttp://jkdamours.com/


Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

Le sanglant sacrifice rituel de Pourim 2012: la pire attaque contre Gaza depuis Plomb Durci

En 2012, Pourim débutait le 8 mars, soit un peu avant le début des attaques sur Gaza.

L’agression de l’occupant Israélien sur Gaza est la plus grave depuis la guerre en 2008

Gaza – CPI

L’écrivain et l’analyste-politique, Ibrahim el-Madhoun, a averti que l’agression de l’occupation israélienne peut continuer à s’intensifier tant qu’il y a le silence arabe et international qui a continué à encourager les crimes de l’occupation.
En outre et dans une déclaration exclusive au CPI, el-Madhoun, a affirmé que « nous devons, tout d’abord, souligner que l’agression de l’ennemi occupant ne s’est pas arrêtée un instant sur la Palestine que ce soit à la bande de Gaza ou en Cisjordanie et à Jérusalem et ce qui se passe actuellement à Gaza n’est qu’un épisode d’une série continue contre le peuple Palestinien et ce va poursuivre tant qu’il y a le silence arabe et international. »
Par ailleurs, il voyait que l’escalade de l’armée occupante israélienne poursuivie sur la bande de Gaza et ciblant le Secrétaire Général des brigades, Zuhair el-Qaissi, est la plus dangereuse depuis la guerre contre Gaza en 2009, et il porte des intentions agressives contre le secteur assiégé, afin de l’épuiser et de le maintenir dans un cercle d’attrition continue.
D’autre côté, el-Madhoun a rajouté que » ce qui est remarquable c’est que le commencement de l’agression est survenue suite à la réunion entre le premier ministre de l’occupation israélienne « Benjamin Netanyahu » et le président américain « Barack Obama » où ils ont convenu de reporter ou d’exclure l’attaque sur l’Iran et apparemment il y a une intention délibérée de l’occupation pour un coup pénible sur la bande de Gaza, afin de regagner la dissuasion perdue suite à l’accord de « Wafaa Al-Ahrar » (Fidélité des Libres), en essayant de faire échouer la résistance, connaître sa capacité réelle sur terrain et suivre tous ses mouvements.
Ensuite, il a souligné que l’ennemi occupant essaye de cibler les cadres de terrain et de se débarrasser d’eux très tôt, il souhaite également envoyer un message à la direction politique de Gaza, en disant que l’occupation israélienne n’a pas oublié la région et ne permet pas à la résistance croissante de continuer ses activités.
D’une part, il a révélé qu’il y a une peur d’un processus israélien prévu et bien préparé pour renouveler l’agression du « Plomb durci » en tant qu’une approche proactive afin de perturber les changements faits grâce aux révolutions arabes et surtout à celle en Egypte et évaluer la réaction réelle de l’opinion publique arabe suite aux révolutions et aux changements menés dans la région, ainsi que pour créer une nouvelle réalité face à des évolutions politiques apparues grâce à ces révolutions qui ont compliqué la crise devant toute tentative arabe sérieuse pour aider la direction palestinienne.
D’autre part, l’analyste a expliqué que l’agression de l’occupation israélienne a pour objectif de briser Gaza et d’exercer des représailles sur elle surtout que cette région est considérée comme le lieu qui inspire les peuples arabes ce qui est incarné dans les convois humanitaires soutenant le secteur assiégé, et levant le slogan de la rupture du siège, ainsi que dans la visite du Premier Ministre  » Ismaël Haniyah » et l’accueil chaleureux du public dans les pays arabes et islamique où ce dernier a appelé à maintenir la résistance dans la bande de Gaza.
En plus, il a averti que les terrains égyptiens et surtout le nord du « Sinaï » ne seront pas loin du danger de l’ennemi en cas de progression de cette agression, tout en sachant qu’il y a une amplification médiatique de la réalité du nord de Sinaï et beaucoup de rapports de l’ennemi occupant israélien appellent à une approche militaire dans la région après la révolution qui a fini le régime de « Moubarak ».
Enfin, il a conclu en disant que: « cette situation exige une intervention et une réaction urgentes pour freiner l’agression de l’ennemi et également une attitude sérieuse et déterminée envers l’ennemi occupant israélien car les objectifs de ses forces armées occupantes sont très graves pour la région.




Vingt-et-un Palestiniens ont été tués et 73 autres blessés dans la bande de Gaza, depuis vendredi 9 mars, lors de raids israéliens. Israël a effectué 36 frappes depuis vendredi, selon des sources palestiniennes. L’armée israélienne a affirmé de son côté que 180 roquettes avaient été tirées sur Israël, dont 46 avaient été interceptées par le système de défense antiroquettes Iron Dome.
Ce nouveau cycle de violences a été déclenché après « l’élimination ciblée » vendredi par Israël de Zouheir al-Qaïssi, chef des Comités de résistance populaire (CRP), mouvement basé à Gaza qui prône la lutte armée contre l’état Hébreu.
Dimanche soir, Israéliens et Palestiniens se sont adressés au Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU, alors que doit se tenir lundi à New York une réunion à haut niveau du Quartette, dont les membres (Etats-Unis, Russie, Union européenne et ONU) tentent de débloquer le processus de paix.

N’oublions pas les quelques roquettes, d’origine suspecte (qui ont tué en 15 ans pas plus qu’une douzaine d’Israéliens!), comme si cela justifiait l’assassinat d’un leader résistant gazaouis…

Les frappes aériennes d’Israël tuent 21 Palestiniens à Gaza

Israel’s Latest Ritual Slaughter

VIDEO – Mark Glenn on Press TV: ‘Palestinian suffering in Israel worse than WWII Jewish plight’

VIDO – Ralph Schoenmann [author The Hidden History of Zionism] on Press TV: Israel attacks Gaza with full support from US

Worst Air Strikes in Gaza Since Operation Cast Lead: 15 killed so far; Gaza siege enters 1733rd day.

Israeli strikes kill 12 in Gaza: Palestinian medics

Rockets from Gaza pound Israel, as airstrike kills militant group’s leader

Twelve-year-old among dead as Israel continues Gaza attack

IDF official: Iron Dome technical failure led to missile strike in Israel’s south
Défaillance technique du « dôme de fer »? On dirait plutôt qu’ils le ferment délibérément pour laisser entrer les roquettes… Ce bouclier anti-missile est supposé fonctionner normalement, mais ce bouclier s’avère être un désastre pour l’image d’Israël: Israël perd tout son capital de sympathie sans ces roquettes.

Israel on alert for attack as Netanyahu vows to strike Gaza terrorists

Iran: Israel’s Gaza raids ‘war crimes’ Islamic Republic’s foreign ministry urges rights groups to condemn Israel’s ‘abhorrent violation of human rights’

Israelis build the world’s biggest detention centre

L’armée israélienne ferme deux télévisions palestiniennes

Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza for a 4th day

Gaza Carnage as Israel’s Statement of Purpose to the entire world viz a viz ‘anti-Semitism’

Netanyahu Discusses Ground Invasion of Gaza

Israel TV celebrity, wife of vice PM demands bombing, “suffering” of Gaza civilians

Les frappes aériennes d’Israël tuent 21 Palestiniens à Gaza

Israel’s bogus case for bombing Gaza obscures political motives

Poursuite de la terreur israélienne : on attend la « no Flying Zone » !

Jews must fight evil Op-ed: Targeted killings of terror leaders moral acts in line with Jewish value of self-defense

L’attaque contre Gaza: un mensonge sioniste de plus

Sur ce blog:


Pendant qu’on regarde ailleurs, Israël s’offre discrètement une nouvelle opération « Plomb Durci »


Prévisible veto américain sur la reconnaissance de la Palestine à l’Onu…


Israël poursuit ses bombardements contre des civils dans Gaza: au tour des F-16, des armes illégales et d’une centaine de tanks de nettoyer la place


« La pire variété d’antisémitisme qui soit »: L’antisionisme, cible prioritaire des extrémistes juifs


Les avorteurs de l’État palestinien


Déni de l’holocauste palestinien (Nakba) et criminalisation de sa mémoire par Israël


Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale


Pourim 2011 (19 et 20 mars) et l’attaque atlanto-sioniste en Libye


La guerre en Irak était une célébration de Pourim


« Le visage de la vengeance juive »

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment

John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

http://crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2008/05/mccain0508.jpg

John McCain: U.S. should bomb Syria

McCain Calls for Bombing Syria ‘We Should Have Learned From Libya’

Israel’s No.1 asset in the Senate calls for airstrikes against Syria

McCain calls for airstrike on Syria Statement is as much a critique of President Barack Obama as a rallying call for an international military campaign, accusing the president of being too soft on Assad.

McCain slams military brass for inaction on Syria

Canada sanctions Syria, McCain calls for air strikes: John Baird, Canada’s Foreign Minister, closes embassy, says « Assad must go »; McCain says US should lead int’l strikes.

Israel wants Syrian govt. toppled: Military intelligence chief

Media Propagates Myth of Israel’s Non-Involvement in Syria

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

McCain and Lieberman meet with the Free Syria Army

John McCain–’Shameful’ that US is not arming Syrian thugs

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

BHL le philosophe demande a Hollande d’intervenir militairement en Syrie

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible

CIA officers regulating arms traffic to Syria opposition groups

Armed groups in Syria receive weapons from Israel

Former Mossad Chief: Arab Spring ‘Incredible Opportunity for Israel »

WINEP provides forum for Syrian National Council — and cover for Israel

Syrie : Des mensonges qui ne changeront pas la dure réalité pour l’Occident

SYRIE : Cinq longues minutes de vérité sur la Cinq

Making Sense of a Rightwing Israeli Institute’s Ambivalent View of Arab Democracy

Syria Strategy looks like Bloody Repeat

MUST READ–Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: “Break Syria into Pieces”

 

Big Powers Move In On Syria: WW3 Set To Blow?

Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: « Break Syria into Pieces » by Michel Chossudovsky

A timely article in the Jerusalem Post last month brings to the forefront the unspoken objective of US foreign policy, namely the breaking up of Syria as a sovereign nation state –along ethnic and religious lines– into several separate and « independent » political entities. The article also confirms the role of Israel in the process of political destabilization of  Syria.  The JP article is titled: « Veteran Kurdish politician calls on Israel to support the break-up of Syria‘ (by Jonathan Spyer) (The Jerusalem Post (May 16, 2012)

The objective of the US sponsored armed insurgency is –with the help of Israel– to « Break Syria into Pieces ».

The « balkanisation of the Syrian Arab Republic » is to be carried out by fostering sectarian divisions, which will eventually lead to a « civil war » modelled on the former Yugoslavia. Last month, Syrian « opposition militants » were dispatched to Kosovo to organize training sessions using the « terrorist expertise » of the US sponsored Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in fighting the Yugoslav armed forces.

Sherkoh Abbas, President of the US based Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria (KNA)  has « called on Israel  to support the break-up of Syria into a series of federal structures based on the country’s various ethnicities. » (Ibid)

One possible « break-up scenario » pertaining to Syria, which constitutes a secular multi-ethnic society, would be the formation of separate and  « independent » Sunni, Alawite-Shiite, Kurdish and Druze states:   “We need to break Syria into pieces,” Abbas said. (Quoted in JP, op. cit., emphasis added).

« The Syrian Kurdish dissident argued that a federal Syria, separated into four or five regions on an ethnic basis, would also serve as a natural “buffer” for Israel against both Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist forces. » (Ibid.).  

Ironically, while Islamist forces are said to constitute the main threat to the Jewish State, Tel Aviv is providing covert support to the Islamist Free Syrian Army (FSA).


Map 1

Meeting behind Closed Doors at the US State Department

A top level US State Department meeting was held in May with members of the Syrian Kurdish opposition. In attendance were representatives of the Kurdish National Council (KNC),  Robert Stephen Ford, the outgoing US ambassador to Syria (who has played a key role in channelling support to the rebels) as well as Frederic C. Hof, a former business partner of Richard Armitage, who currently serves as the administration’s « special coordinator on Syria ». (Ibid). The delegation also met with Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman.

Frederic C. Hof, Robert Stephen Ford and Jeffrey Feltman are the State Department’s key Syria policy-makers, with close links to the Syrian Free Army (SFA) and the Syrian National Council (SNC).

 


Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman


Frederic C. Hof, The Administration’s « special coordinator on Syria »


Robert S. Ford, outgoing US Ambassador to Syria

The public statements of KNA leader Sherkoh Abbas in the wake of the State Department meeting suggest that the political fracturing of the Syrian Arab Republic along ethnic and religious lines as well as the creation of an « independent Kurdistan » were discussed. « State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner described [the meeting's] purpose as part of ‘ongoing efforts… to help the Syrian [Kurdish] opposition build a more cohesive opposition to Assad.’”  (Ibid).

The KNA leader called upon Washington to support the creation of a separate Kurdish State consisting of  « an autonomous region in Syria; joining the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq – which borders the Kurdish region in Syria; or perhaps an even larger Kurdish state » [Greater Kurdistan].

« The Kurdish people, in all parts of Kurdistan, seek the right to form an independent Kurdish state. We can only achieve this cherished goal with the help of the western democracies, and first and foremost the U.S.” said Sherkoh Abbas. (Syria: An Alternative, Choice, Ekurd.net, May 22, 2012)

It is worth noting, in this regard, that the creation of a « Greater Kurdistan » has been envisaged for several years by the Pentagon as part of a broader « Plan for Redrawing the Middle East ».(See map 2 below)

This option, which appears unlikely in the near future, would go against the interests of Turkey, a staunch ally of both the US and Israel. Another scenario, which is contemplated by Ankara would consist in the annexation to Turkey of parts of Syrian Kurdistan. (See map above).

« Greater Kurdistan » would include portions of Iran, Syria, Iraq and Turkey as conveyed in Coronel  Ralph Peters (ret) celebrated map of « The New Middle East » (see below). (For Further details see Mahdi Nazemroaya’s November 2006 Global Research article).

Colonel Peters taught at the US Military Academy.


- by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2006-11-18
Towards the balkanization (division) and finlandization (pacification) of the Middle East
Map 2. The New Middle East

The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006,
Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).

Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers.
This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.

 

Lieberman-McCain Strike Again

Written by Maidhc Ó Cathail

April 11, 2012 at 9:11 am

According to Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin, Sens. John McCain and Joe Lieberman are “on a surprise trip” to the Turkish-Syrian border to meet with leaders of the Free Syria Army. Rehashing the rhetoric that led the United States into wars in Kosovo, Iraq and Libya, the deadly duo proclaimed:

If America still stands for the cause of oppressed people who are fighting for their freedom, and justice, and deliverance from tyranny, we cannot abandon the people of Syria. We cannot shirk our responsibility to lead. Our deepest values and interests compel us to act in Syria, and we must do so before it is too late.

The only “surprise” is that Israel doesn’t try to cover its tracks better.

 

 

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, June 8, 2012
(…) Pentagon and US State department documents as well as independent reports confirm that military action against Syria has been contemplated by Washington and Tel Aviv for more than 20 years.

Targeting Iran, « Protecting Israel » 

According to James P. Rubin, the war plans directed against Syria are intimately related to those pertaining to Iran. They are part of the same US-Israeli military agenda which consists in weakening Iran with a view to « protecting Israel ». The latter objective is to be carried out through a pre-emptive attack against Iran:  « We’re not done with the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iran » says James P. Rubin. (…)
The military roadmap to Tehran goes through Damascus. The unspoken objective of the US-NATO-Israeli sponsored insurgency in Syria is to destabilize Syria as a Nation State and undermine Iran’s influence in the region (including its support of the Palestinian Liberation movement and Hezbollah). The underlying objective is also to eliminate all forms of resistance to the Zionist State:

« That is where Syria comes in, says James P, Rubin. It is the strategic relationship between the Islamic Republic and the Assad regime that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security. Over the three decades of hostility between Iran and Israel, a direct military confrontation has never occurred — but through Hezbollah, which is sustained and trained by Iran via Syria, the Islamic Republic has proven able to threaten Israeli security interests.

The collapse of the Assad regime would sunder this dangerous alliance. Defense Minister Ehud Barak, arguably the most important Israeli decision-maker on this question, recently told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that the Assad regime’s fall « will be a major blow to the radical axis, major blow to Iran…. It’s the only kind of outpost of the Iranian influence in the Arab world … and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. » (The Real Reason to Intervene in Syria – By James P. Rubin | Foreign Policy, June 2, 2012, emphasis added)

US-Israeli War Plans directed against Syria

Rubin candidly outlines the contours of US military intervention in Syria, which is to be implemented in close liaison with Israel. A diplomatic solution will not work, nor will economic sanctions: « only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator’s stance » says Rubin (…)

While the participation of Israel in military operations is not mentioned, the thrust of Rubin’s article points to active cooperation between Washington and Tel Aviv in military and intelligence affairs, including the conduct of covert operations in support of the opposition rebels. This coordination would also be carried out in the context of the bilateral military-intelligence cooperation agreement between Israel and Turkey.

« Coming to the rescue of the Syrian people » under a fake « humanitarian » R2P mandate is intended to destabilize Syria, weaken Iran and enable Israel to exert greater political control and influence over neighboring Arab states including Lebanon and Syria.

A war on Syria is also a war on Palestine. It would weaken  the resistance movement in the occupied territories. It would reinforce the Netanyahu government’s ambitions to create a « Greater Israel », initially, through the outright annexation of the Palestinian territories:

« With the Islamic Republic deprived of its gateway to the Arab world, the Israelis’ rationale for a bolt from the blue attack on its nuclear facilities would diminish. A new Syrian regime might eventually even resume the frozen peace talks regarding the Golan Heights. In Lebanon, Hezbollah would be cut off from its Iranian sponsor, since Syria would no longer be a transit point for Iranian training, assistance, and missiles. All these strategic benefits combined with the moral purpose of saving tens of thousands of civilians from murder at the hands of the Assad regime … make intervention in Syria a calculated risk, but still a risk worth taking. » (Rubin, op cit)

War Crimes in the name of human rights: What we really need is « Regime Change » in the United States of America…. and Israel.

 

 

TUT Podcast June 6, 2012

Syria’s destruction in order to create a ‘Greater Israel’–a plan in the works for a long time.

We are joined by ‘George’ from the Syrian Free Press network to discuss this and other relevant issues.

Download Here

FLASHBACK juin 2011: La déstabilisation de la Syrie et la guerre élargie au Moyen-Orient

VIDEO – Jean Marie Le Pen sur la Syrie, l’Iran et l’arme nucléaire

The Crusade for Syria: A Big Lie

NATO’s ‘Civil War’ Machine Rolls Into Syria

Unholy Alliance Forming Against Syria Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Brussels, Arab puppet regimes, Extremist Wahhabis, Al-Qaeda

Syria Under Attack by Globalist Death Squad Experts

SYRIE. Opération terroriste appuyée par les États-Unis: Tuer des civils innocents pour justifier une guerre humanitaire

Top IDF officer: Terrorist threat in Syria could be directed at Israel: The deterioration of Syria’s central regime could lead to a growing terrorist threat against Israel, a top Israel Defense…

Le massacre de Houla fait partie du nettoyage ethnique du gouvernorat d’Homs prévu comme base arrière pour l’ASL

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

May 28 2012: 108 Syrians Killed Just prior to Annan’s meeting with Assad (ce massacre ne saurait être un hasard, il fut clairement programmé pour affaiblir Assad juste avant sa rencontre avec des émissaires de l’ONU!)

US Blames Russia, Iran for Upcoming Syria War

Blackwater agents involved in Syria unrest

French president says Syria’s Assad has to go (Les estie de caves qui croyaient qu les choses allaient changer avec un socialiste!! Plein d’Arabes-musulmans stupides ont voté pour Hollande!)

UN-backed action in Syria is an option, Hollande says

Romney Calls for Action on Syria, but His Party Is Divided

The BBC’s Photo Fib of a Syrian Massacre (des images de bébés irakiens tués détournées pour fins de propagande: pour illustrer un supposé massacre en Syrie…)

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible (Il s’est pas montré aussi inquiet lors des bombardements de civils libanais – incluant bien sûr femmes et enfants – lors de l’attaque israélienne contre le Liban en 2006.)

Rebels behind Houla massacre, US plan to destabilize Syria in full swing

The Houla Massacre: US-Sponsored Terrorists « Killed Families Loyal to the Government »

Oh la la, BBC : Une photo d’Irak pour illustrer le massacre de Houla ?

Le massacre de Houla était planifié et a été instrumentalisé

MEDIA DISINFORMATION: West Desperately Attempts to Spin Syrian Crisis

SYRIA, Atrocities were not committed by the government but by armed gangs Vatican News Service refutes Western media reports

UN Report on Houla Massacre Conflicts With Rebel Accounts

Russian Journalist Exposes Propaganda Lies about Houla Massacre- by Stephen Lendman

Syrian President Assad vows to keep fighting Western-backed terrorists

The Houla Hoaxsters

Clinton: Russia Must Embrace Regime Change in Syria

In address to parliament, Assad blames Syria crisis on ‘outside forces’

Antiwar.com yet again obscures Israel’s role in Syria

Pro-Assads were ‘picked’ by killers in Houla massacre: US author

VIDEO – Mark Glenn / PressTv

UK to set up camps inside Syria to help rebels

‘US, Israel plot to topple al-Assad Govt’

a Syrie au programme du Bilderberg

Le narratif syrien de l’Occident se base sur “un mec dans un appartement au Royaume-Uni”

Un propagandiste de l’opposition syrienne dans un appartement en Angleterre, la seule source citée par la presse occidentale

Advanced State of Readiness: US Military Lobbies for War with Syria

SYRIA: NATO’s Next « Humanitarian » War? ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK

Chantage contre la Russie : les États-Unis promeuvent les massacres pour justifier la guerre contre la Syrie

Propaganda War: The Houla Massacre Committed by The West’s “Free Syrian Army” But They Accuse Syrian Gov’t

How not to stop the violence in Syria — Elie Wiesel’s latest bright idea
By Maidhc Ó Cathail
June 9, 2012
Touted on Twitter as a “must-read” by John McCain, Elie Wiesel had an op-ed in yesterday’s Washington Post titled “How to stop the Syria massacre.” Clearly distressed that the United States appears to be finally growing weary of fighting wars in Israel’s increasingly destabilized backyard, the prosperous Holocaust survivor lays on the guilt trip:

Military intervention? No. Why not? Because the American people are tired of waging distant wars. Because American families have lost too many sons and daughters in far-away conflicts. Should Syrian families suffer because of the help we have given others? Because of the sacrifices we have already made?

The warmongering Nobel Peace Prize laureate has another bright idea, however:

I am not sure that armed assistance is the only solution. Economic sanctions have proved to be relatively futile elsewhere. But why not imagine yet another option that might produce a dramatic effect?
Why not warn Assad that, unless he stops the murderous policy he is engaged in, he will be arrested and brought to the international criminal court in the Hague and charged with committing crimes against humanity?
Read the rest of this entry »

LOL!!! Netanyahu–Assad slaughtering Syrian civilians with the aid of Iran, Hezbollah

Report: Rebels Responsible for Houla Massacre

SYRIE : Les rebelles sont responsables du massacre de Houla

Imran Hossein–NATO Wants Turkey To Invade Syria

Military: Syria Chemical Stocks Threaten Israel

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrie: l’OTAN prépare une vaste opération d’intoxication

L’affaire de Houla illustre le retard du renseignement occidental en Syrie

« Humanitarian War Criminals » in High Office: Was the Houla Massacre Ordered by the Western Military Alliance?

Un nouveau massacre en Syrie Nouvelles révélations sur les victimes de Houla.

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrian rebels’ arsenal includes remote-controlled truck bombs

US accelerates preparations for ‘no-fly zone’ in Syria

‘Dozens of Kuwaiti jihadists’ join different nationalities to enlist in Free Syrian Army

Israel wants airstrikes against Syria: Analyst

John Bolton: Syria, World War and the destruction of America

Syrian Foreign Minister–’We are not in Civil War but rather fighting terrorists’

America’s interest in Syria is Israel

Russia Accuses U.S. of Supplying Arms to Syria Rebels to Fight Assad

Amnesty accuses Syrian forces of killings, destruction to deter residents from aiding rebels

Israel lobby celebrates Treasury’s successful use of “financial tools” to support Arab Spring

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels By Maidhc Ó Cathail

Israel must use the ‘opportunity’ provided by the Arab Spring, says former IDF chief-designate

Syrie : les miliciens battent en retraite

Syrian Liberators, Bearing Toy Guns

U.N. Observers In Syria Suspend Mission After Escalating Violence

US backtracks on claims Russia is arming Syrian regime

U.S. says weighing ‘next steps’ with partners on Syria

U.S. military completes initial planning for Syria

VIDEO – CIA, MI6 agents direct massacres in Syria: American analyst (avec Stephen Lendman, juif pas juifiste)

Israel may use military force ‘to secure’ Syria’s alleged chemical arsenal

Israel’s Peres says he hopes Syrian rebels “will win”

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels

 

VIDEO – Roland Dumas : les Anglais préparaient la guerre pour ISRAËL en Syrie deux ans avant les manifestations en 2011
Voir aussi: Roland Dumas, ancien ministre français des affaires étrangères: « Israël contrôle le service de renseignement français »

 

Sur ce blog:


La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur…

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!

McCain et Lieberman: « bombardez la Libye! »

Posted in Non classé | Leave a comment