Yitzhak Shamir, le terroriste devenu président d’Israël qui joua un rôle central dans la conspiration contre JFK

Dans Final Judgment: The Missing Links in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy (1994) l’auteur Michael Collins Piper accuse Yitzhak « Shamir » (Yitzhak Yezernitzky, qui a non seulement été terroriste mais premier ministre d’Israël!) d’avoir trempé dans le complot pour assassiner JFK, alors qu’il était en fonctions à la tête de l’escouade d’assassins du Mossad. Il aurait assuré l’embauche de tireurs d’élite étrangers (grâce à un ami dans les services secrets français), pour mener ainsi à bien l’opération de camouflage de l’identité véritable des conspirateurs, qui auraient été nuls autres que: le Premier ministre israélien d’alors David « Ben-Gurion » (David Gryn), le chef de l’escouade d’assassins du Mossad Yitzhak « Shamir » (Yitzhak Yezernitsky) ainsi que leurs alliés à l’intérieur de la CIA et de la pègre chapeautée par Meyer « Lansky » (Meyer Suchowljansky).


THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

(…)
« Yitzhak Shamir – A long-time Mossad officer (based largely at the Mossad’s chief European office in Paris), Shamir headed the Mossad’s assassination squad at the time of the JFK assassination. A former French intelligence officer has charged that Shamir himself arranged the hiring of JFK’s actual assassins through a close ally in French intelligence. (See Chapter 5 and Chapter 16)
(…)
Georges deLannurien – High ranking official in the SDECE, the French intelligence agency; pinpointed by a former French intelligence officer as the individual who (at the behest of Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir) contracted the hit team who killed JFK in Dallas. (See Chapter 16)(…)

A MOSSAD HIT SQUAD

We know precisely who would have coordinated Mossad participation in the assassination on John F. Kennedy, working in concert with Israel’s allies in the CIA and in Organized Crime (about more of which we shall discuss in these pages.)

Israel’s respected Ha’aretz newspaper reported on July 3, 1992 that it was former Jewish underground terrorist-turned-Mossad operative Yitzhak Shamir (later Israeli Prime Minister) who headed a special Mossad hit squad during his service in the Mossad.

The Israeli newspaper reported that Shamir headed the assassination unit from 1955 until 1964—the year after JFK’ s assassination. « The unit carried out attacks on perceived enemies and suspected Nazi War criminals, »(147) according to an account of the newspaper’s report.

« In February 1963 Mr. Shamir dispatched squads on two unsuccessful attempts to assassinate Hans Kleinwachter, a German scientist suspected of helping Egypt develop missiles. Another German scientist working for the Egyptians, Heinz Krug, disappeared mysteriously in September 1962. »(148) Shamir‘s operatives were suspected of having been responsible.

According to the Israeli newspaper, Shamir had recruited members for his Mossad hit squad from former members of the Stern Gang, the underground terrorist group that Shamir led during Israel’s fight for independence. The Stern Gang was responsible for the murder, in 1944, of Lord Moyne, Britain’s resident Mideast minister, and for the slaying of U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948. (149)

THE FRENCH CONNECTION . . .

In a private communication to this author after he read the first draft of Final Judgment—sent to him by no less than former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley (R-Ill.)—former French intelligence officer Pierre Neuville stated (based on his own inside knowledge) that a French team—professional assassins—were among the actual shooters in Dealey Plaza, committing the crime at the behest of the Israeli Mossad. (In the Postscript to this volume we review the remarkable story of this Frenchman and his own astounding experiences with the Mossad.)

In Neuville’s judgment: « Never the Prime Minister of Israel would have involved Mossad people, American Jews or CIA personnel in the execution part of the conspiracy. Even the CIA contract the services of other members of the intelligence community (they like the French style) to wash dirty linens. The right hand does not know what the left did. The cover-up team doesn’t know who execute. And the executioners are not interested in the aftermath of their mission. They don’t care less. »(652)

According to Neuville’s sources, then-Mossad assassination chief Yitzhak Shamir (later prime minister of Israel) arranged the hiring of at least one of the assassins through the deputy chief of the French intelligence service (the SDECE), Colonel Georges deLannurien.

« It was no coincidence, » Neuville wrote, « that on the very day of the execution of the president by the French team that [deLannurien] was at Langley meeting with James Jesus Angleton, the Mossad mole. »

According to Neuville, « There are no coincidences in the suspicion business—just cover-ups. The case of communist infiltration of the French secret service was an appropriate cover-up to justify the presence of Colonel deLannurien at Langley, Virginia. » (653)

It seems obvious that Angleton and deLannurien were together for a very specific purpose: damage control—making sure that the assassination cover-up fell into place after the crime itself had been committed.

Angleton himself told the House Assassinations Committee that de Lannurien had come to his office for just that purpose: seeking assistance in routing out communist moles in the SDECE. (654)

This controversy—alleged KGB infiltration into French intelligence—was a direct result of Angleton’s machinations. It was Angleton (often prodded by his Mossad allies) who had a history of fingering alleged Soviet infiltrators in other nations’ intelligence services, creating mass disarray, confusion, bitterness and resentment in their ranks.

Following World War II Angleton served as American intelligence liaison with the SDECE and maintained close friendships with a number of French intelligence officials throughout his career. And undoubtedly these were Frenchmen who shared Angleton’s devotion to Israel.
(…)

A SMALL CIRCLE OF CONSPIRATORS

The close connections between a relatively small circle of people and those in their immediate spheres of influence is no coincidence. That all of them, in some fashion, were part of the circumstances surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy is also no coincidence.

Critics of JFK assassination conspiracy theories contend that a conspiracy so immense would require a vast number of people involved. In fact, the mechanics of initiating the conspiracy described in Final Judgment involved perhaps no more than 20 people. Most of those ultimately involved in the conspiracy were probably not even aware of the activities of the others who were involved. So then, let us name, for the record, those whom we believe had advance knowledge that John F. Kennedy was going to be killed on November 22, 1963. They are:

  • Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion;
  • Israeli Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir;
  • Permindex chief executive officer Louis M. Bloomfield;
  • Mossad officer and Permindex banker Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum;
  • CIA Counterintelligence chief James J. Angleton;
  • French intelligence officer Georges deLannurien;
  • Crime Syndicate boss Meyer Lansky;
  • The actual shooters in Dealey Plaza. Evidence strongly points toward French mercenary Michael Mertz as one of those gunmen. In any case, as we have seen, at least one assassin was contracted by the Mossad through disloyal elements in French intelligence, although it is probable that there were several assassination teams in place.
  • CIA contract agent and longtime Mossad asset Frank Sturgis claimed to have played a part in the events in Dealey Plaza. His Cuban exile henchmen, Guillermo and Ignacio Novo, who were with Sturgis in Dallas also played some role, although whether they were actual gunmen has yet to be determined.

Although it is likely (although not certain) that Meyer Lansky’s Mafia lieutenants—Santo Trafficante, Jr. of Tampa and Carlos Marcello of New Orleans—had advance knowledge of the impending assassination itself, it is not clear that they, or, for that matter, Chicago Mafia boss Sam Giancana or the Mafia’s « roving ambassador, » Johnny Rosselli, were actually involved in the planning of the assassination itself. However, we do know today that both Giancana and Rosselli were under the thumb of Mossad-connected crime boss Hyman Lamer—and that opens up a whole new can of worms.

The role of the Italian-American organized crime figures in the JFK assassination is more media-generated myth than reality. At best, they were secondary players in the bigger scheme of things.

In Appendix Nine we will also consider the likely role—at least as an intermediary—that top-ranking Mossad figure Shaul Eisenberg played in the events surrounding the assassination, suggesting that Eisenberg did, in fact, have advance knowledge of the impending assassination.

Shamir,deLannurien,CohenJames_Angleton

(…)As far as the Mossad is concerned, Mossad operatives could not have acted without the direct orders of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir. The Mossad is actually a very small organization institutionally, as former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky has pointed out. It is even more tightly knit than the CIA. In fact, according to Ostrovsky there is what one might call an assassinations « board of directors » within the Mossad and no assassination can be  orchestrated by the Mossad without a formal vote of approval by this board.

There’s another important thing to remember here: it is highly unlikely that the Mossad—at least at that juncture in history—would have ever considered killing the president of the United States unless it knew that it had the institutional consent of the CIA, at the very least. Israel’s position was highly precarious in 1963 and for the Mossad—or even so-called « rogue elements » of the Mossad—to attempt the assassination of the American president without the assurance that it had the support of the CIA, for example, would have been a rash move indeed. So there were no « rogue » Mossad elements involved in the assassination of JFK. »

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Tout pour défendre les intérêts d’Israël: le Canada ouvre la voie à une intervention militaire en Syrie

Blanrue.blogspot.com – Comme BHL, Israël demande une « intervention massive » en Syrie

 

Le Canada, désormais le plus fidèle laquais d’Israël, à la rescousse!

 

Syrie : l’armée canadienne se prépare à une éventuelle intervention

Des sources militaires ont confié à La Presse canadienne que l’armée canadienne se préparait à une éventuelle intervention en Syrie dans le cadre d’une opération internationale.(…)

La zone d’exclusion aérienne a été utilisée une première fois en Irak (1991-1992), puis en Bosnie (1993) et l’année passée en Libye.(…)

Israël est formellement en état de guerre avec la Syrie, son voisin au nord, mais la frontière entre les deux pays n’a connu aucun incident notable depuis la fin de la guerre israélo-arabe en octobre 1973. [Presse Canadienne]

 

Une guerre en Syrie est d’autant plus importante qu’elle constitue une étape de plus menant à la prochaine guerre us-sioniste prévue depuis longtemps contre l’Iran.

Canada’s defense minister’s message to Canadian military – We’re ready to send you to die for Israel

‘A threat to Israel is a threat to Canada’: Peter MacKay to Jewish commander


Le ministre canadien des Affaires étrangères: nous continuerons à soutenir l’État juif
Le ministre canadien des Affaires étrangères, John Baird, était l’invité d’honneur au Congrès annuel en faveur de la Liberté de Religion (Religious Liberty Dinner) qui s’est tenu la semaine dernière à Washington. Dans son discours devant  les participants du congrès, le Ministre Baird a soutenu la politique pro-israélienne du gouvernement canadien; ainsi a reporté le journal « National Post ».

Sur ce blog:

DÉMÉNAGEMENT DE CE BLOG Dû AUX NOUVELLES LOIS CONTRE LA HAINE SUR INTERNET

LE GOUVERNEMENT CANADIEN SAIT COMMENT PLAIRE À SON MAÎTRE ET SE PORTE VOLONTAIRE POUR RAYER L’IRAN DE LA CARTE ADVENANT LE CAS OÙ LES USA REFUSERAIENT DE LE FAIRE

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Du mythe des « nazis pro-Israël » et de ceux qui voient des complots partout…

http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/1260eb1247193a8f48855b1292d6284d.jpg

Exemple de fantasme conspirationniste de naïfs et/ou menteurs: Hitler en ambassadeur du judaïsme sioniste

 

De nombreux conspirationnistes s’en donnent à coeur joie à amalgamer nazisme et sionisme et à proclamer que les nazis étaient sionistes et vice versa. Certains par exemple voudraient faire croire que le mot nazi vient de National Sioniste alors qu’il vient clairement de « national-socialiste » comme Sozi vient de « socialiste »! (C’est le cas d’Eustace Mullins, qui a tendance à dire ce que les gens veulent entendre et qui croit les délires d’Eric Jon Phelps, auteur de Vatican Assassins, sur le complot jésuite.) Le traître faux révisionniste Mark Weber a contribué à cette tendance avec certains articles qui reprennent, entre autre chose, le mythe entourant une pièce commémorant le voyage d’un dignitaire nazi en Palestine sioniste. Jim Condit admet avoir emprunté à « Ratisbone » (un Polonais catholique anti-nazi Dr Paul Reznowski) plus de 95% de ce qu’il dit dans son vidéo sur Hitler et Israël. Or cette pièce n’est qu’une publicité pour un article de journal, et le politicien nazi qui a fait ce voyage a vu son étoile décliner rapidement. (Dans ce MP3, Condit Jr est confronté à un détracteur de sa vidéo « The Final Solution ot Adolf Hitler ».)

Quant à l’Accord de Transfert, qui fait l’objet d’un traitement des plus sensationnaliste, les comptes-rendus les plus honnêtes sont ceux de Lenni Brenner, de Udo Walendy et Ingrid Weckert (mentionnée à cette émission de Spingola Speaks).

 

 

 

A coin with two sides

(…) Boas’s article described how Baron Leopold Itz von Mildenstein, a member of the Nazi party and of Hitler’s SS, set out in the Spring of 1933, accompanied by his wife and Kurt Tuchler, an official of the Zionist Federation of Germany, also with his wife, on a journey to Palestine.

Hitler had just become Chancellor, and begun his anti-Jewish policies. Julius Streicher wanted to drive the Jews out of Germany. But the Nazis were not clear about how they intended to set about this without disrupting the already Depression-beset German economy, and nor did they know what the effects might be on Germany’s relations with the rest of the world.

The Zionists, for their part, were enjoying an upsurge of support among German Jews after Hitler took office in January 1933. Most had seen little point before in leaving a country where they were well-established to take their chances in poor and troubled Palestine. They saw themselves as good Germans whose future, like so much of their past, was in the Fatherland. But now Hitler was telling them otherwise.

The Juedische Rundschaue, fortnightly paper of the Zionist Federation, saw its circulation climb from less than 10,000 to almost 38,500 by the end of 1933. It declared that only those whose commitment to the Jewish people was beyond reproach could defend Jewish rights. It also said that only the Zionists were capable of approaching the Nazis in good faith as « honest partners ».

The Zionists proposed that the status of German Jews be regulated on a group basis, and asked for government help towards emigration. Von Mildenstein, approached to write something favourable about Zionism and its project in Palestine, agreed on condition that he could make a visit, accompanied by Kurt Tuchler. He was favourably impressed, and saw advantages for Germany, as well as for the SS as proposers of a policy.

A series of article entitled « Ein Nazi faehrt nach Palestina » began in September 1934 in Der Angriff, Goebbels’ newspaper. It ran for twelve parts. Von Mildenstein saw in the Jewish settlement on the land a form of rebirth fitting Nazi notions about blood and soil, as well as a way of ridding Germany of Jews. But life was difficult in Palestine, and problems were looming, in Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist colonisation and British rule.

Though the SS gave privileges to Zionists over other Jewish groups, assisting their youth movements, and giving them the right to wear uniform and fly the blue and white flag, Von Mildenstein’s own star faded amid rivalries and policy failures, while a man he had brought into the Jewish department came to the fore, one Adolf Eichmann.

But while Von Mildenstein was influencing policy, Der Angriff had a medal struck to commemorate his voyage to Palestine, a medal with the Nazi swastika on one side and the Star of David on the other. (…)

Now I am grateful to Lenni Brenner for sending a picture of a solid reminder of the past. He writes that John Sigler, an anti-Zionist Jew, has found one of Goebbels’ medals, struck to commemorate Von Mildenstein’s trip.

« John bought his medal from a respected coin dealer. It’s about 1.5″ in diameter and was originally in bronze. It is thicker than a coin. The photo is of a silvered bronze. (Silvered medals are common.).

The Star of David side inscription reads: EIN NAZI FÄHRT NACH PALÄSTINA — A Nazi Travels to Palestine. The Swastika side inscription is UND ERZÄHLT DAVON IM Angriff — And tells about it in the Angriff« . (…)

 



« Les sionistes juifs ont secrètement manipulé l’anti-Juif Hitler »

bel exemple de gros mensonge!

(On est plus facilement berné par un gros mensonge que par un petit, donc plus c’est gros mieux ça passe.)

 On partit à cet égard de ce principe très juste que, du plus grand des mensonges, l’on croit toujours une certaine partie : la grande masse du peuple laisse en effet plus facilement corrompre les fibres les plus profondes de son cœur qu’elle ne se lancera, volontairement et consciemment, dans le mal : aussi, dans la simplicité primitive de ses sentiments, sera-t-elle plus facilement victime d’un grand mensonge que d’un petit. Elle ne commet elle-même, en général, que de petits mensonges, tandis qu’elle aurait trop de honte à en commettre de grands.
Elle ne pourra pas concevoir une telle fausseté et elle ne pourra pas croire, même chez dautres, à la possibilité de ces fausses interprétations, d’une impudence inouïe : même si on l’éclaire, elle doutera, hésitera longtemps et, tout au moins, elle admettra encore pour vraie une explication quelconque qui lui aura été proposée.  Qu’il reste toujours quelque chose des plus impudents mensonges, c’est un fait que les plus grands artistes en tromperie et que les associations de trompeurs ne connaissent que trop bien et qu’ils emploient dès lors bassement. (Adolf Hitler, Mon combat)

 

 

« Qui donc a mis comme ça Rothschild sous les verrous ? pour spéculations ? C’est pas Schussnig, c’est pas Cachin, c’est pas Jouhaux, c’est pas Blum, c’est pas Chamberlain, c’est pas Staline, c’est Hitler. 

Quel est le véritable ennemi du capitalisme ? C’est le fascisme. Le communisme est un truc de Juif, un moyen d’asservir le peuple plus vachement encore, absolument à l’oeil. 

Quel est le véritable ami du peuple ? Le Fascisme. 

Qui a le plus fait pour l’ouvrier ? L’U.R.S.S. ou Hitler ?C’est Hitler. 

Y a qu’à regarder sans merde rouge plein les yeux. 

Qui a fait le plus pour le petit commerçant ? C’est pas Thorez, c’est Hitler ! 

Qui nous préserve de la Guerre ? C’est Hitler ! 

Les communistes (juifs ou enjuivés), ne pensent qu’à nous envoyer à la bute, à nous faire crever en Croisades. 

Hitler est un bon éleveur de peuples, il est du côté de la Vie, il est soucieux de la vie des peuples, et même de la nôtre. C’est un Aryen. »

– Céline, l’école des cadavres , 1938

 

 

« Une partie de sa race se reconnaît ouvertement pour un peuple étranger, non sans d’ailleurs commettre un nouveau mensonge. (…) Ils ( les sionistes ) n’ont pas du tout l’intention d’édifier en Palestine un État juif pour aller s’y fixer ; ils ont simplement en vue d’y établir l’organisation centrale de leur entreprise charlatanesque d’internationalisme universel ; elle serait ainsi douée de droits de souveraineté et soustraite à l’intervention des autres États ; elle serait un lieu d’asile pour tous les gredins démasqués et une école supérieure pour les futurs bateleurs. » (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf)

 

 

Extrait du chapitre 3 (« Zionism is Judaism: The Foundation for a Global Jewish Imperium ») du livre de Michael Collins Piper: THE NEW BABYLON: Those Who Reign Supreme

Pour le moment, cependant, nous devons faire une digression critique, en explorant la relation largement discutée entre l’Allemagne nazie et le mouvement sioniste. Cela a fait l’objet d’une telle quantité de mésinformation et de désinformation délibérée, propagée la plupart du temps par des gens bien intentionnés qui n’ont rien saisi de l’ «image d’ensemble».

Tandis que certains ont souligné à juste titre que — pendant les premières années du régime nazi d’Adolf Hitler à tout le moins — le gouvernement allemand a collaboré avec des éléments du mouvement sioniste en Allemagne et ailleurs, ce point reste très mal compris, mal interprété.

Certaines personnes plus naïves et impressionnables ont déclaré que c’était la preuve que « Hitler était un sioniste » et que l’objectif central derrière la création du Troisième Reich était de conduire à la Shoah, pour qu’ensuite l’état sioniste puisse naître des cendres des morts. C’est une thèse bien vivante, mais qui résulte surtout d’une forte imagination couplée à un engrenage fantastique et fantaisiste d’une grande variété de forces et d’événements, pas nécessairement reliés entre eux, tombant en place l’un après l’autre pour réaliser l’objectif final: un État sioniste.

Bien qu’effectivement le régime national-socialiste en Allemagne ait d’abord formé des liens de collaboration ténus avec les sionistes en Europe et en Palestine, voyant cela comme un moyen idéal pour convaincre et pousser les Juifs à quitter l’Europe, ces liens se sont généralement désintégrés, pendant que les Allemands se rendaient à l’évidence, en temps de guerre, que la collaboration avec les Arabes antisionistes en Afrique du Nord et au Moyen-Orient était beaucoup plus productive et profitable aux objectifs allemands. Alors, bien qu’il soit vrai que les Allemands ont collaboré avec les sionistes, cette affaire a été largement exagérée par des gens qui ne veulent pas ou qui sont tout simplement incapables de voir l’image géopolitique d’ensemble — autrement plus importante.

Remarquons également que nombre de ceux qui ont adopté la position selon laquelle « Hitler était un sioniste » ont souvent tendance à être des individus — aussi bien intentionnés qu’ils soient — qui évoquent cet argument afin de « prouver » qu’ils ne sont pas «anti-sémite», comme pour dire « Eh bien, même si je suis un critique d’Israël, je ne suis pas «comme Hitler», puisque, après tout, c’est Hitler qui a contribué à créer l’État d’Israël. »

Ceux qui disent cela ne parviennent pas à comprendre que l’élite du pouvoir juif et le mouvement sioniste se moquent de cette prise de position et considèrent toute personne qui ne ferait même que flirter avec cette théorie comme étant tout aussi mauvaise que ceux et celles qui sont des critiques ouverts, purs et simples, d’Israël, du sionisme et de l’agenda juif.

Les études les plus responsables sur la collaboration allemande-sioniste se trouvent dans les ouvrages de Lenni Brenner, un marxiste américain né juif orthodoxe, dont les ouvrages ‘Zionism in the Age of Dictators’ et son plus tardif ’51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With The Nazis’, remettent correctement la question dans son contexte. Cela n’a pas empêché les sensationnalistes de tordre la vérité.

Il y a aussi la légende selon laquelle « les banquiers juifs » ou « les banquiers sionistes » (expressions souvent utilisées interchangeablement) auraient financé Hitler. Cela n’est pas vrai.

James Pool, dans son ouvrage faisant autorité ‘Who Financed Hitler?’ démontre le contraire.

Certes, un financier juif en Allemagne a donné de l’argent au parti nazi — avant la montée au pouvoir d’Adolf Hitler — mais ces fonds étaient destinés à aider l’opposition anti-Hitler à l’intérieur du parti, afin de stopper Hitler. Mais en dépit de ce fait, certains «patriotes» prétendent encore que « les Juifs ont soutenu Hitler ».

Plusieurs parmi ceux qui croient en de tels non-sens citent un document qui est un fraude flagrante d’origine obscure intitulé ‘Hitler’s Secret Backers’, soi-disant écrit par un certain « Sidney Warburg », l’un de ces « banquiers juifs. » Mais ce document, comme nous l’avons dit, est une fraude.

Le livre ‘Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler’, de feu Dr. Antony Sutton, fait la promotion de cette théorie basée en partie sur le canular Warburg, et contribué à établir ce mythe durablement — au plus grand mépris de la vérité.

Des banques et des sociétés américaines ont effectivement travaillé avec le régime hitlérien, le plus souvent dans la suite des arrangements financiers remontant à des décennies, mais il cela ne faisait partie d’aucune conspiration pour mettre Hitler au pouvoir. L’affirmation selon laquelle la famille Bush aurait contribué à la montée d’Hitler est un autre mythe.

Kevin Phillips — nullement un admirateur de la dynastie des Bush — examine les circonstances réelles entourant le scénario Bush-Hitler dans son livre, ‘Americain Dynasty: Aristocraty, Fortune, And The Politics of Deceit In The House Of Bush’, et les faits en perspective.

Une autre affirmation insensée — selon laquelle Hitler et la plupart des dirigeants nazis étaient en fait Juifs ou en partie juifs — a son origine principale dans un travail quasi impénétrable et tout à fait bizarre intitulé ‘Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel’.

Malheureusement, à l’âge de l’Internet, ce volume, dont la plupart de ceux qui le citent ne l’ont jamais réellement lu, a été largement vanté, même par une poignée d’âmes autrement responsables qui veulent croire, semble-t-il, que Hitler faisait partie du « complot juif. »

Un écrivain de talent américain, Martin Kerr, a produit une étude faisant autorité, « Le mythe du grand-père juif d’Hitler », disponible sur Internet, qui examine toutes les théories et les méandres sur ce sujet et démolit complètement cette théorie. Mais, encore une fois, cela n’empêche pas les sensationnalistes de dire « ça doit être vrai: Hitler était un Juif et un sioniste. »

Bien que tout ceci ait été une digression saillante, elle était nécessaire, précisément parce qu’il circule énormément de mésinformation et de désinformation délibérée, sur Internet et dans des ouvrages divers parus au cours du dernier demi-siècle, au sujet des relations entre les nazis d’Adolf Hitler et l’agenda sioniste et juif.

Alors, malheureusement, afin de remettre l’histoire en accord avec les faits, il est essentiel de répondre à toutes ces sornettes.

Pour mémoire — reprenons le cours de notre analyse du sionisme et du judaïsme (en lien avec ce que nous connaissons aujourd’hui comme le Nouvel Ordre Mondial). On notera d’abord ceci: la vérité est que, au fil des années, il y a eu de nombreuses personnes — dont certaines ouvertement anti-juives — qui ont vu une certaine sagesse dans le sionisme en général.

Autrement dit, ils ont vu le départ des Juifs hors de leur pays et la concentration de la population juive dans un état appartenant à tous les Juifs (mais pas nécessairement en terre palestinienne arabe) comme un moyen de résoudre enfin le conflit séculaire entre les Juifs et tous les autres.

En 1922, Théodore Fritsch, un écrivain allemand anti-juif bien connu, reconnaissait son admiration pour l’idéologie sioniste:

Nous considérons toujours les sionistes comme les plus honnêtes des Juifs, parce qu’ils admettent. . . qu’il ne peut y avoir de mélange avec les populations non-juives, que les diverses races se dérangent mutuellement dans leur développement et leur culture. Nous demandons donc avec les sionistes « une séparation claire » et la fondation d’un dominion exclusivement juif. . . .

Dans la même veine, en 1921, l’auteur français Georges Batault a écrit dans Le problème juif:

Si le peuple juif reconstitué souhaite se classer en tant que nation parmi les nations, alors il est du devoir et de l’intérêt de chacun de l’aider à le faire. S’il envisage, au contraire, de s’organiser au niveau international afin de ruiner et de dominer les nations, alors il est du devoir de ces dernières de se lever et de l’en interdire.

Toutefois, Batault reconnaissait que, en définitive, les enseignements juifs professent que les Juifs en viendront à gouverner la terre dans son intégralité:

Et quant au résultat final de la révolution messianique, il sera toujours le même; Dieu renversera les rois et fera triompher Israël et son roi; les nations seront converties au judaïsme et obéiront à la loi, ou bien seront détruites et les Juifs seront maîtres du monde.

En France, durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il y avait une vaste opposition à l’influence juive, non seulement dans le régime de Vichy dans le sud de la France, un régime indépendant qui a collaboré avec l’Allemagne nazie, mais également même dans la zone occupée par les Allemands dans le Nord de la France.

(Parenthèse intéressante: beaucoup de gens aujourd’hui, en particulier des Américains mal informés, voient la France de Vichy comme les « méchants » qui étaient « antisémites » et la France occupée par les Allemands comme les « bons gars » qui « détestaient les nazis et s’opposaient à leurs vues antisémites », cependant la vérité est que l’opposition au pouvoir juif et à l’influence juive était très répandue dans toute la France et cela malgré toutes les légendes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.)

En tout état de cause, un écrivain a parlé de ces préoccupations chez les Français, c’est Gabriel Malglaive, dont le livre ‘Juif ou Français?’ publié en 1942, explique quelles ont été les mesures prises dans la France de Vichy afin de limiter le pouvoir juif. Il dit que ces mesures visaient quatre objectifs principaux:

1. Résolument exclure les Juifs du gouvernement. . . . Ce fut la première tâche et relativement la plus simple, car cela ne concernait seulement qu’un petit nombre. . . ;
2. Combattre leur influence intellectuelle, et tout soutien et l’extension de leur intrusion dans l’État, et les exclure à cette fin des professions libérales, de l’enseignement, de la presse, etc;
3. Éliminer leur suprématie « économique et financière », leur prépondérance dans tous les domaines de l’industrie, du commerce, du marché boursier et des banques, c’est-à-dire déjudaïser ce domaine qui avait été le leur. Agir de telle manière à ce qu’ils ne tiennent plus le pouvoir de l’argent, le plus redoutable, car s’ils l’avaient gardé, ils auraient conservé en pratique tous les autres pouvoirs;
4. Finalement éliminer leur pouvoir occulte en les tenant éloignés des corporations et sociétés, en purgeant. . . la presse et les agences à travers lesquelles ils ont établi une propagande rusée et [leur] censure de facto. . .

En fin de compte, écrit-il, ce que lui et tant d’autres ont considéré comme « le problème juif » appelle à une « solution juive. » Ironie du sort, dit Malglaive, à l’avenir les grandes puissances du monde, y compris même le peuple juif, seront forcés de reconnaître « l’existence de la nation juive », et par conséquent de délimiter un territoire qui serait remis à la nation juive.

Ceci, bien sûr, correspond en fait à ce que nous connaissons aujourd’hui comme « le sionisme ». Le résultat serait, dit Malglaive, que dès lors, « tous les Juifs du monde posséderont légalement et officiellement la nationalité juive que leurs cœurs ont toujours secrètement réclamé. » La question, conclu-t-il, est de savoir « si souhaitant régler le problème humainement nous voulons cesser d’être provoqués par les Juifs, ou si, en continuant ainsi à prendre des demi-mesures, nous nous résignons à un règlement partiel et donc malheureux de cette question ».

 

 

V.O.A.:

For the moment, however, we must make a critical digression, to explore the much-discussed relationship between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement. This has been the subject of so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation, much of it spread by well-meaning folks who don’t understand the “big picture.”

While there are those who have correctly pointed out that—during the early years of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler—the German government actually collaborated with elements of the Zionist movement in Germany and elsewhere, this point has been largely misunderstood and misconstrued.

Some more naive and excitable folks have declared this to be proof that “Hitler was a Zionist”and that the entire purpose of the creation of the Third Reich was setting in place the Holocaust so that a Zionist state could emerge from the ashes of the dead. This is quite a lively thesis, but one which essentially relies on a lot of imagination coupled with a fantastic and fanciful dependence upon a wide variety of forces and events—not necessarily connected—falling into place in order to achieve the final goal: a Zionist state.

While the National Socialist regime in Germany did initially form some loose collaborative efforts with Zionists in Europe and Palestine, seeing this as an ideal way to convince and persuade Jews to leave Europe, these ties generally disintegrated as the Germans recognized, during wartime, that collaboration with the anti-Zionist Arabs in North Africa and the Middle East was far more productive for German goals. So while there is truth that the Germans did collaborate with the Zionists, the matter has been largely overstated by persons who are unwilling or simply incapable of looking at the much-larger—and far more important—geopolitical picture.

Let it also be said that many of those who have adopted the stance that “Hitler was a Zionist” often tend to be individuals—however well-meaning they may be—who use that term to “prove” that they aren’t “anti-Semitic,” as if to say “Well, even though I’m a critic of Israel, I’m not ‘like Hitler’ since, after all, it was Hitler who helped bring about the state of Israel.”

Those who tout this line fail to understand that the Jewish Power Elite and the Zionist movement scoff at this stance and consider anyone who even flirts with this theory to be just as bad as those others who are outright, open critics of Israel, Zionism and the Jewish agenda.

The most responsible studies of German-Zionist collaboration can be found in the work of Lenni Brenner, an Orthodox Jewish-born American Marxist, whose Zionism in the Age of the Dictators and his later volume, 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis, correctly put the matter in context. This has not stopped sensationalists from twisting the truth.

There is also the legend that “The Jewish bankers” or “The Zionist bankers” (used often interchangeably) financed Hitler. Not true.

James Pool, in his authoritative work, Who Financed Hitler? demonstrates quite the contrary.

In one instance a Jewish financier in Germany did give money to the Nazi Party—prior to the rise to power of Adolf Hitler—but those funds were designed to help Hitler’s intra-party opposition, to stop Hitler. But despite this fact, some “patriots” still say that “The Jews backed Hitler.”

Many of those who worship at the altar of this nonsense cite a flagrantly-fraudulent document of shadowy origins entitled Hitler’s Secret Bankers, ostensibly written by one “Sidney Warburg,” one of those “Jewish bankers.” But this document, as we’ve said, is a fraud.

The late Dr. Antony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler has promoted this theory, based in part on the Warburg travesty and has given further institutionalization to this mythology—the truth be damned.

American banks and corporations did work with the Hitler regime, usually a continuation of previous financial arrangements going back decades, but this was not part of any grand conspiracy to bring Hitler to power. The claim that the Bush family was integral to the rise of Hitler is another myth.

Kevin Phillips—no admirer of the Bush dynasty—examines the actual circumstances surrounding the Bush-Hitler scenario in his book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush and puts the facts in proper perspective.

Another nonsensical claim—that Hitler and most of the top Nazis were actually Jews or part Jewish—has its primary origin in a virtually impenetrable and quite bizarre work entitled Adolf Hitler: Founder of Israel.

Sadly, in the age of the Internet, this volume, which most of those who quote it have never actually read, has been widely touted, even by a handful of otherwise responsible souls who want to believe, it appears, that Hitler was part of “the Jewish conspiracy.”

A talented American writer, Martin Kerr, has written an authoritative study,“The Myth of Hitler’s Jewish Grandfather,” which can be found on the Internet, which examines all of the theories and meanderings on this topic and lays the theory to rest. But, again, that doesn’t stop the sensationalists from saying “it must be true: Hitler was a Jew and a Zionist.”

While all of this has been a distinct digression, it’s been a necessary one, precisely because there is so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation regarding the relationship between Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and the Zionist and Jewish agenda that has littered the Internet and published works throughout the last half century.

So, unfortunately, in order to bring history into accord with the facts, it is critical to address the nonsense.

For the record, let us return to our course of analysis—the issue of Zionism and Judaism (vis-a-vis what we know today as the New World Order). And we shall note this: the truth is that, over the years, there have been many people—admittedly anti-Jewish—who saw some wisdom in Zionism generally.

That is, they saw the departure of Jews from their lands and the concentration of the Jewish population in a state all the Jews own (although not necessarily in Arab Palestine) as a means of finally resolving the age-old conflict between the Jews and all others.

In 1922, Theodore Fritsch, a well known German anti-Jewish writer, actually acknowledged his admiration for Zionist ideology:

We still consider the Zionists as the most honest of Jews, because they admit that . . . there be no amalgamation with the non-Jewish people, that the diverse races moreover mutually disturb each other in their development and culture. We therefore demand together with the Zionists“a clean separation” and the settlement of a Jews-only dominion. . . .

In a similar vein, in 1921, French author Georges Batault wrote in The Jewish Problem:

If the reconstituted Jewish people wishes to rank itself as a nation among the nations, then it is the duty and the interest of each one to help it to do so. If it contemplates, on the contrary, organizing itself internationally in order to ruin and dominate the nations, then it is the duty of the latter to rise up and forbid it.

However, Batault recognized that, ultimately, Jewish teachings taught that the Jews would come to rule the earth in its entirety:

As for the final result of the Messianic revolution, it will always be the same; God will overthrow the kings and will cause Israel and its king to triumph; the nations will be converted to Judaism, and will obey the law or else they will be destroyed and the Jews will be the masters of the world.

In France, during World War II, there was widespread opposition to Jewish influence, not only in the Vichy Regime in Southern France, an independent regime which collaborated with Nazi Germany, but likewise even in the German occupied area of Northern France.

(Note this interesting aside: Many people today, especially un-learned Americans, perceive Vichy France to be the “bad guys” who were “anti-Semitic” and German Occupied France to be the“good guys”who“hated the Nazis and opposed their anti-Semitic point of view” but the truth is that opposition to Jewish power and influence was widespread throughout all of France, the legends of World War II notwithstanding.)

In any event, one writer who spoke about these concerns among the French was Gabriel Malglaive, whose book Jewish or French? published in 1942, discussed measures taken in Vichy France designed to curtail Jewish power. He said there were four principal aims underlying these measures:

1. Resolutely to separate the Jews from the government . . . . That was the first task and relatively the simplest, because it envisaged only a small number. . . ;
2. To combat their intellectual influence,support and extensionof their intrusion into the state; to separate them, to this end, from the liberal professions, from teaching, from the press, etc;
3. To eliminate their “economic and financial” supremacy, their preponderance in all branches of industry, commerce, the stock market and the banks, that is, to de-Judaize this realm which had been theirs. To act in such a manner that they would no longer retain the power of money, the most fearful one, for if they had kept it, they would have, in practice, conserved all the others;
4. To eliminate, finally, their occult power by keeping them away from corporations, by purifying . . . the press and agencies through which they established a cunning ropaganda and [their] de facto censorship . . . .

In the end, he wrote, that what he and so many others considered “the Jewish Problem” would have to be given what he called a “Jewish Solution.” Ironically, Malglaive said, in the future the great powers of the world, even including the Jewish people,would be forced to recognize “the existence of the Jewish nation” and therefore assign a territory which would be turned over to the Jewish nation.

This, of course, is, in fact, what we today know of as “Zionism.” The result would be, said Malglaive, that from then on,“all of the Jews of the world will possess legally, officially, the Jewish nationality which their hearts have always secretly chosen.”The issue, he concluded, was “whether wishing to settle the problem humanely we want to cease being provoked by the Jews, or whether, continuing to apply half-measures,we resign ourselves to a partial and thus poor settlement of this Question.”

 


Une dose de réalité…

Naissance du nationalisme arabe au contact du national-socialisme allemand

NYJTIMES – Nazi Roots of Palestinian Nationalism (Notez que là où il est question d’extermination des juifs il est en réalité question d’expulsion massive des juifs.)

Les arabes de Palestine sous la bannière nazie. La collaboration entre nazis et nationalistes palestiniens  1933-1946

Rethinking Hitler & National Socialism

More thoughts about Adolf Hitler and National Socialism

HOW A BANKRUPT GERMANY SOLVED ITS INFRASTRUCTURE PROBLEMS, by Ellen Brown (author of Web of Debt)


VIDEO – Deanna Spingola – The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933

 

 

VIDEO – L’influence britannique (pas allemande!) derrière le sionisme (À visionner sur youtube)

 

Sur ce blog:

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Gordon Duff décline l’invitation de la révisionniste Carolyn Yeager, sous prétexte qu’elle ne connaît pas la « connexion Bush-nazis » (connexion qui n’a jamais existé!)

Duff a tort sur l’Holocauste et les prétendus liens Bush-Hitler

Une contre-vérité tenace: « Prescott Bush, un nazi! »

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste des Rothschild

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Coup de filet de l’IRS contre l’évasion fiscale vers les banques israéliennes

 

Tax Shelters: Why Israel Could Be the Next Switzerland

Published: Tuesday, 19 Jun 2012 | 3:38 PM ET Text Size

By: Eamon Javers CNBC Washington, DC Correspondent

It looks like Israel is going to be the next Switzerland — at least as far as the Department of Justice’s investigation into offshore tax avoidance is concerned.

Mike Kemp | Getty Images

On June 14, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment against three American tax preparers for helping clients avoid taxes by moving money to Israel.

The transgressions detailed in the indictment were relatively small-time. The indictment said the father and son duo of David and Nadav Kalai and their colleague David Almog at a firm called United Revenue Service helped several clients duck taxes by moving money to two Israeli banks, identified only as “Bank A” and “Bank B.”

Most of the financial transactions detailed were small — in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. The men could not be reached for comment.

But the indictment revealed the existence of a grand jury that is almost surely going after much bigger fish. And the details provided in it appear to suggest that “Bank A” is Bank Leumi, whose private banking operation is headquartered in Tel Aviv, and “Bank B” is Bank Hapoalim, which also maintains its global private banking center in Israel’s second-biggest city.

Calls to Bank Leumi for comment were not returned. Bank Hapoalim provided CNBC with a statement from its chief spokesperson, Ofra Preuss, who said, “we read the press reports and are checking into them.”

To date, the U.S. government has successfully cracked the code of Swiss bank secrecy, forcing UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, to turn over thousands of names of American account holders to investigators, and taking similar actions against other Swiss institutions.

Sources tell CNBC the new case is just the beginning of a potential series of indictments, which may snare some of the wealthy American clients who have hidden money in Israel, many for generations. That’s likely to be politically controversial, especially at a time when the U.S. and Israel are working closely together to contain a geopolitical threat from Iran.

Add to that the political sensitivity of an Obama administration Department of Justice in an election year targeting a group of clients of whom many are likely to be Jewish or have historical family ties to Israel.

“There are a substantial number of Americans with unreported assets in Israel,” said Scott Michel, a partner at the law firm Caplin & Drysdale who specializes in criminal tax fraud investigations. “I wouldn’t be surprised if it is on a par with Switzerland.”

Attorney Bryan Skarlatos, a partner at the firm Kostelanetz & Fink LLP, said that he has clients who are being questioned in the wide-ranging investigation into Israeli bankers.

“I have special agents asking questions about specific banks,” Skarlatos said. “They need evidence that somebody spoke to a banker and the banker had a sense that they were dealing with a U.S. person — they’re asking ‘did you give them your U.S. passport?’”

Both Michel and Skarlatos spoke of allegations of cash-transfer banking, in which overseas bankers match up American clients who want to withdraw and deposit the same amount of cash with the foreign bank.

The bankers appear in the U.S., typically at a hotel, and arrange for couriers to bring the cash to the hotel from the depositing customer, and later turn it over to the withdrawing customer, only later crediting each account for the transaction back in the foreign bank offices.

It can be a dangerous way to avoid taxes, Skarlatos said.

“Some people don’t want to pay taxes, but they’ll risk their lives having someone show up on their doorstep with $3 million in cash,” he said.

In a highly technical and global economy, it’s getting more and more difficult for Americans to hide their assets overseas — and keep it hidden from the IRS. And that means the days of $3 million cash transfers may be coming to an end.

© 2012 CNBC.com

 

Tax Evasion Through Israel: IRS And Justice Department Indict Three Israeli-American Tax Preparers

Police say largest invoice forgery scheme exposed  Months of covert investigation leads to arrest of nine suspects involved in distribution of fictitious invoices totaling NIS 3.5 billion, theft of NIS 600 million in taxes

Two dozen suspects arrested in ‘largest tax fraud in Israeli history’ Suspects allegedly issued NIS 3.5 billion in fictitious tax receipts.

IRS Hot On The Trail Of Hidden Bank Leumi & Other Israeli Accounts

US targets tax avoidance via Israeli banks – report « CNBC » reports that the US Department of Justice is cracking down on US citizens using Israeli banks to smuggle money to Israel.

Police say largest invoice forgery scheme exposed  Months of covert investigation leads to arrest of nine suspects involved in distribution of fictitious invoices totaling NIS 3.5 billion, theft of NIS 600 million in taxes

Nine arrested in Israel’s biggest ever tax fraud case The Tax Authority accuses the suspects in the fuel industry of distributing NIS 3.5 billion worth of fictitious invoices.

3 accused of using Israeli banks’ European branches in alleged American tax scam According to the indictment, the three men allegedly helped clients in setting up undeclared accounts.

Tax Preparers Charged with Hiding Funds in Israeli Banks

Tax preparers charged using Israel bank for fraud

Exclusive: U.S. tax-evasion probe turns to Israeli banks

 

 

L’une des banques impliqués, la banque Leumi, possède aussi des parts importantes dans le système de prisons privées aux États-Unis, et est connectée à un segment des Républicains.

« (…) the second biggest bank in Israel, Bank Leumi—owned in part by the government of Israel itself—held a controlling interest in one of the big « American » corporations that reap vast profits by operating private prisons in the United States where thousands work at slave-labor wages while serving out their penal terms. This came even while Israel was outlawing private prisons on is own soil. (…) none of the many opponents of the private prison industries in America Jumped on the fact that Republican Vice President Dan Wayle, in fact, was chairman of the board of the Cerberus Global Investments, the New York-based holding company which, in 2008, purchased the Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the Israeli bank that held the controlling interest in the « American » company operating private prisons in America. (…)  Israelis are essentially in charge of maintaining a substantial control over America’s penal system—and of a growing number of penal systems  throughout the world where Israeli-owned companies are agressively engaged in setting up private prison systems (…) » (Michael Collins Piper, CONFESSIONS OF AN ANTI-SEMITE, 2011, p.348-349)

Du coup, Michael Collins Piper pose la question: Obama serait-il en train d’affaiblir ses rivaux (droite israélienne et conservateurs cashers républicains) avec ce coup de filet?

TUT Pod-Broadcast June 21 2012

Organized Jewish interests at war with each other–

–Right wing elements in Israel supporting Romney

–Left-wing elements support Obama

–The rest of us left hanging in the middle between war and peace/life and death.

We are joined by the ONE AND ONLY Michael Collins Piper to discuss this and other relevant topics.

Download Here

 

Plus d’infos:

Wealthy Zionists behind US financial meltdown: Analyst

Contre le ZOG: À quand un mouvement « Un-Occupy »?

Les grandes fortunes familiales qui contrôlent la finance et les affaires

Qui contrôle les États-Unis?

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Un peu de lecture pour l’été qui commence

Ci-dessous, notre sélection du jury: quelques-unes des meilleures références en matière de vérité historique objective.

Soulignons qu’une bonne partie de ces ouvrages ont été rendus disponibles gratuitement sur le Net grâce au travail herculéen de l’équipe du Savoisien.

 

App Austin Joseph (ang.)
Bacque, James (ang.)(fr.)
Benson, Ivor (ang.)
Butz Arthur R. (ang.)(fr.)
Degrelle, Léon (fr.)(ang.)
Delaisi, Francis (fr.)
De Zayas Alfred-Maurice (ang.)
Dilling, Elizabeth (ang.)
Graf, Jürgen (ang.)
Hedesheimer, Don (ang.)
Horowitz, Elliott (ang.)
Leese, Arnold S. (ang.)
MacDonogh, Giles (ang.)
Petras, James (ang.)
Piper, Michael Collins (ang.)
Pool, James and Suzanne (ang.)
Porter, Carlos W. (ang.)(fr.)
Reynouard, Vincent (fr.)
Rudolf, Germar (ang.)
Sack, John (ang.)
Sniegoski, Stephen (ang.)
takeourworldback.com (ang.)(fr.)
Walendy, Udo (ang.)(fr.)
Yeager, Carolyn (ang.)

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

À voir

Remerciements bien mérités à tous ceux et celles qui ont contribué à rendre ces vidéos disponibles sur le Net gratuitement, plus spécialement merci à l’équipe du Savoisien

Homo Toxicus (English)

Homo Toxicus (English)

The Fluoride Deception: Amy Goodman w/ Christopher Bryson

Le jeu de l’argent

Die Rothschilds Aktien auf Waterloo – 1940 [ENG SUB]

The Story Behind the Bernie Madoff Scandal – « The Gentiles did this to us! »

The Diamond Empire: The Oppenheimer Family Cartel and Artificial Scarcity

Human Trafficking in Israel

Bronfman Biography

MEYER LANSKY – GANGLAND : (-1- -2- -3- -4- -5-)

Rise and Fall of the Jewish Mafia : (-1- -2- -3- -4-)

MURDER INC. – GANGLAND : (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Victor Ostrovsky Ex Mossad Agent: (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Michael Collins Piper – Final Judgment – JFK Assassination Israeli Connection

The Dark Side of the Anti-Defamation League (2e copie)

Diffamation (fr) (v.o.a.)

The Hatemongers Among Us

Jewish Media Supremacy (ch.5 from « Jewish Supremacism ») by David Duke

Is the Major Media Controlled? – Willis Carto

La Toile (Le Unabomber, le LSD et l’internet) (fr)The Net (v.o.a.)

Edward Bernays – Propaganda (fr)

AIPAC : Un oeil sur la planète. Le reportage de France 2 qui n’a pas plu à Israël

Le lobby pro-israélien aux USA (v.o.a.) (no narrator)

Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby

Le Canada sous influence: le poids du lobby pro-Israël à Ottawaretour sur le grand reportage

The Iraq War was Made for Israel, by Israeli-Firsters inside the Bush admin

The Neocon Agenda with Stephen Sniegoski

The War Party

Vendre la guerre aux Américains (v.f.) (War Made Easy V.O.A.)

Qui est derrière la propagande anti-Islam?

How Zionist Jews Invented Modern Terrorism

Proof Israel did 911 (télécharger)

911 was a Jew Job

5 Dancing Israelis Arrested on 911

Israel et le 11 septembre par Ryan Dawson v.f.

911: Les militaires américains savent qu’Israël a fait le coup (s-t fr)

The INSLAW Affair

L’arme secrète d’Israel (Mordecai Vanunu) en v.f.

Israel’s Secret Weapon (Mordecai Vanunu) (télécharger v.ang.)

Le nouveau désordre mondial (montage)

Jenin Jenin (2002)

People and the Land

Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land

The Rise of Israel’s Military RabbisPt2

Baruch Goldstein’s Massacre at the Jerusalem Mosque (télécharger)

Frontline: Israel’s Next War

God’s Jewish Warriors

Jérusalem: dérive radicale de deux rabbins

Rabbi Friedman: « Destroy Holy Sites (…) Kill the Men, Women and Children and Cattle

Le Betar Tagar de FranceLa milice juive de la LDJ s’entraîne dans des bâtiments protégés par la police française

Ciel Mon Mardi bagarre en direct (version courte)

La nouvelle extrême-droite et l’alliance sioniste contre l’Islam

The Bloody History of Communism (playlist)

The Jewish Hand in Bolshevism/Communism (Jura Lina)

La déclaration Balfour: la terre promise en échange que les Juifs poussent les États-Unis en guerre

Bronfman a financé et supervisé la production d’assez d’Anthrax pour exterminer 30 fois la pop mondiale

28 avril 1939 : Hitler évoque le cas de la Palestine

Hitler contre les usuriers internationaux

Adolf Hitler – ‘We Shall Crush the Freemasons!’

Adolf Hitler: Our enemies today face the entire German Volk!

International Jewry Won WWII Their Purim

Les dossiers secrets du nazisme – VENGEANCE (Empoisonner les Allemands)

L’extrémiste François Genoud: De Hitler à Carlos – National Socialiste Suisse

Le 11 septembre et le retour du révisionnisme

The Karma of Untruthfulness Documentary – feat. Terry Boardman (Rudolf Steiner media studies)

A Holocaust Inquiry (ch.12 from Jewish Supremacism) by David Duke

Le Phénomène Herman Rosenblat – Un Survivant de la Shoah balance tout ! (reportage en v.o.a.)

Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil

Auschwitz—The Surprising Hidden Truth

Ernst Zundel-The Great Holocaust Trial in Canada

Honest Media Today ( ; Understanding Anti-Semitism, Jewish Ritual Murder, The Holocaust Unveiled: The Persecution of the Revisionnists, Zionist War Crimes, etc.)

Léon DegrelleEntretien avec Degrelle

Vincent Reynouard (chaîne youtube)Autre chaîne – (télécharger)

David IrvingDavid Irving, l’origine de l’insurrection hongroise de 1956

Robert Faurisson

Germar Rudolf (2e copie)

Fritz Berg

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Le printemps arabe: « une incroyable opportunité pour Israël », selon l’ancien directeur du Mossad Meir Dagan et le Maj. Gen. et criminel de guerre Yoav Galant

Israel must use the ‘opportunity’ provided by the Arab Spring, says former IDF chief-designate 

Maj. Gen. Yoav Galant remains quiet about his failed appointment as IDF chief and says seven good years of Israel’s security are about to end.

Maj. Gen. (ret. ) Yoav Galant spoke about his fears for Israel’s security, and about how the country should « market » itself, at conference hosted by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy in Washington on Thursday.

On his failed appointment as the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff, Galant has preferred to keep silent, stating only that « one day the full scope of the story will be revealed. » But on Friday, as the speaker at the fifth annual Zeev Schiff Memorial Lecture on Middle East Security, he provided his perspective on events shaking the region, and how Israel should deal with them.

« I believe the Israel Defense Forces is doing a good job », Galant said. « The most prominent and difficult question is how to keep Israel just, and how to market it. I believe we have an opportunity now – after the world was watching [Syrian President Bashar] Assad killing more civilian Arabs than Israel killed in 60 years – we have to use this opportunity. And we need to be more humble, more solid, to pay more respect to other people, to young generations, because good ideas arise from these generations. »

He also called Assad the last Alawite ruler of Syria, though Galant did not want to predict how long Assad could hold onto power.

In the case of Syria, Galant said, time is not on Israel’s side. « It’s not working for us in Syria, because the vacuum on the opposition side is going to be filled with radical Muslims, with Al-Qaida involved, the Muslim Brotherhood. In two years, we’ll have very extremist people on the other side. »

Seven good years of Israel’s security are about to end, Galant claimed, as the changes in the Middle East have complicated Israel’s situation.

Demographic trends are also undermining the impact of the IDF, he said. Within 10 years, Galant said, there will be 8 million Jews and 8 million non-Jews west of the Jordan, and later on, Jews will be the minority in this area.

He said that the Sinai Bedouin population on Israel’s southern border is becoming an outlaw group, marginalized by the central government, but he stressed that this is an internal, domestic issue for Egypt to solve.

Asked what, in his opinion, are minimal defensible borders in the West Bank and how to deal with the settlements, Galant ducked the question.

He stressed that improving the situation for the Palestinians is in Israel’s interest. « If the situation will be better on the Palestinian side, we’ll get sooner to the solution. »

Former Mossad Chief: Arab Spring ‘Incredible Opportunity for Israel »

Published: June 20th, 2012
Latest update: June 21st, 2012

Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan, speaking at the 2012 Presidential Conference in Jerusalem, expressed cautious optimism about the potential outcomes of the Arab Spring, saying that “we are in a very unique position that has never been seen before.”

Dagan was part of a panel discussing the Arab Spring, steps that regional actors could take to help ensure a peaceful transition to democracy, and the impact of these revolutions on Israel. The panel also featured, among others, former IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, and former senior Presidential adviser Dennis Ross.

Dagan, who has maintained a high profile since his tenure as Mossad chief ended, said that “the radicals in the Arab League are no longer there and a range of mutual interests that require regional cooperation provide an incredible opportunity for fostering peaceful relations.” Still, he acknowledged that the Arab Spring is far from over: “I am worried about Islamist parties with a radical agenda that will take power. It will present a big problem for us.”

Referring to the recent Presidential election in Egypt and claims that the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohammed Morsi is slated for victory, he said that “in Egypt it was never important which way the votes go but who counts them.”

Former IDF chief Ashkenazi also weighed in on the monumental changes taking place in the Arab world, saying that “the storm sweeping the Arab world is of tectonic proportions. It happens once every 100 years and cannot be overestimated. This is not just a coup. I don’t know anyone in the defense establishment that predicted what happened there.” He said it was critical that Israel preserve open lines of communication with the Egyptian army: “It is practically the only channel…with Turkey as well.”

Discussing the importance of Israel maintaining its relative military superiority, Ashkenazi offered his solution to the controversial issue of national/military service for all Israeli citizens: “It has long been my belief that not everyone must be drafted. We should go by a principle of service for all, not enlistment for all.

“The IDF should get first pick,” he continued. “Whoever is not selected by the IDF will go to the Fire Services, Magen David Adom or other services…As for the haredim, it’s very important they join the army and then enter the work force. The Torah greats will decide who goes to yeshivot and the rest will join the army.”

Dennis Ross, talking about the role that the U.S. should play in the Arab Spring, said “we in the West are not the authors of this story, so we won’t be the ones to write it. But if we are asked for help, we should offer it, with ground rules – respect religion, minorities and free speech – if they don’t follow these rules they shouldn’t be entitled to help.”

The Presidential Conference will wrap up tomorrow, after hearing from the likes of Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Chairman of the Jewish Agency Natan Sharansky, Rabbi Michael Melchior, and journalist Caroline Glick.

Mais la Jordanie ne serait pas touchée selon lui. Comment peut-il savoir cela?

Dagan predicts Arab Spring won’t reach Jordan

Making Sense of a Rightwing Israeli Institute’s Ambivalent View of Arab Democracy

Israel lobby celebrates Treasury’s successful use of “financial tools” to support Arab Spring

Pourquoi Israël se réjouit-il de l’arrivée de partis islamiques au pouvoir? (en Égypte)

 

 

Pourquoi Israel soutient des rebelles jihadistes musulmans? une telle instabilité ne met-elle pas en danger l’existence d’Israel demande la journaliste à BHL. Non, répond-il! (Après une longue déclaration de son attachement inconditionnel à Israel) « C’est bon pour Israël! »

Attends, j’ai pas saisi en quoi c’est bon pour Israel.

Éjecter Assad et Khadafi c’étaient déjà en soi des objectifs sionistes, mais fallait-il à tout prix fomenter une révolution dans tout le pays avec l’aide de sectateurs musulmans terroristes pour un simple assassinat politique? Il semble qu’il manque encore un élément de réponse pour expliquer pourquoi Israel soutiendrait des djihadistes au lieu de tout simplement éliminer Assad physiquement (ce qui ne devrait pas être si difficile pour le Mossad et ses armées de Sayanim).

Piper explique le principe du « sionisme catastrophe » ou « sionisme de guerre », selon lequel Israel doit toujours être sur un pied de guerre avec au moins un ennemi, si c’est pas sur plusieurs fronts, pour survivre. Israel carbure au conflit, à la crise, à la guerre perpétuelle. Sans la guerre Israel ne se voit plus de raison d’être, éclate de l’intérieur et tombe de lui-même. Il doit donc se faire plein d’ennemis, réels ou pas, c’est pas ça l’essentiel.  L’essentiel c’est la provocation réussie qui  victimisation, qui renfloue sans cesse leur capital de sympathie.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/catastrophic_zionism_257.html

While most rational people would assume that Israel would prefer to have neighboring states that are stable, successful participants in the region, this is not necessarily the case.

In fact, a carefully crafted “think piece” entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s,” featured in the February 1982 edition of the World Zionist Organization’s Jerusalem-based publication Kivunim: A Journal for Judaism and Zionism, candidly put forth an Israeli strategy to wreak havoc in the Arab world, dividing the Arab states from within. The author was Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist with close ties to Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

The program—which amounted to “balkanizing” the various Arab republics, splitting them into religious enclaves in which, for example, Shiite Muslims or otherwise Sunni Muslims would predominate—was an agenda that Israeli dissident Israel Shahak said, quite simply, was designed “to make an imperial Israel into a world power,” by disrupting the Arab states and thereby setting the stage for Israeli dominance in the Mideast.

The formula was founded on the idea of creating chaos among Israel’s Arab neighbors, hardly a policy any decent, well-meaning neighbor could be credited for fostering. In fact, the current-day political and religious divisions and devastation in Iraq—the consequence of the American invasion of Iraq demanded by the pro-Israel lobby in Washington—mirrors precisely what the Zionist position paper laid forth as the ideal state of affairs for Iraq, from an Israeli point of view, that is.

But where does Egypt fit into all of this? Reflecting on the Zionist strategy paper, Ralph Schoenman—an eminent American Jewish critic of Zionism—writing in 1988 in his book, The Hidden History of Zionism, pointedly noted the paper’s intent of “double-crossing Mubarak” and emphasized that the Yinon paper hoped for “the downfall and dissolution of Egypt,” despite the 1979 Camp David peace agreement.

This is geopolitics at its best—or worst—and demonstrates the kind of gambles Israel has historically been willing to take.

After all, Israel helped subsidize and nurture the fledgling Hamas faction within the Palestinian statehood movement, as a means to counter and undermine the secular Fatah faction led by senior Palestinian statesman Yassir Arafat. But Hamas got out of control, grew in popularity, and now stands as one of Israel’s chief rivals.

Such gamesmanship by Israel is part of a philosophy known as “catastrophic Zionism,” a term used almost exclusively by Israeli and Jewish writers.

The theme of “catastrophic Zionism,” sometimes called “war Zionism,” suggests that Israel—as a state— relies on crisis and the potential of war with its neighbors as a foundation of its very existence. This has actually been the belief of many hard-line “right wing” elements going back to the earliest days of Israel.

In short, there are many Zionists who believe such crisis is vital—fundamental—to Israel’s survival. And for this reason, the believers in “catastrophic Zionism” will never lend their support to any policy, domestic or international, that could lead to a final solution of the conflict between Israel and its Arab and Muslim neighbors.


In actual fact, this notion—that peace could be dangerous to the survival of Israel—is a governing concept in the minds of many Israelis and their supporters worldwide.


Is Israel the Winner of the Arab Spring?

by Gabriel M. Scheinmann

Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs

Israelis understandably feel imperiled by the misnamed “Arab Spring.” Their country’s three-decade peace treaty with Egypt is under assault, its strategic alliance with Turkey has dissolved, and its closest regional ally, Jordan, is withering from domestic protests.

The breakdown in political authority has flooded Israel’s borders with a slew of dangerous weapons, from Libyan missiles in Gaza to Syrian Scuds in southern Lebanon. Meanwhile, the Iranian nuclear program progresses unabated. Individually, each of these developments is cause for great concern; taken together, Israelis see the walls closing in.

Although the initial flickers of liberalism have been subsumed by the Islamist bonfire, the so-called “Arab Spring” has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other. While Arab capitals burn, Jerusalem has calmly and carefully steeled itself against the possible immediate deleterious effects, building fences along its Egyptian and Jordanian borders and accelerating the deployment of its Iron Dome anti-missile system. Whereas Arab states remain mired in internal political, economic, and military turmoil, Israel hums along, its economy intact – tourism is at an all-time high – its military untested, and its government united.

For three decades, Mubarak’s Egypt was the anchor of Israel’s regional security. Since his ouster, the lawless Sinai has been the source of rocket attacks, Egypt has canceled its gas contract with Israel, Israel’s Cairo embassy staff barely survived an attempted mob lynching and the Muslim Brotherhood has issued disquieting verbal volleys against the peace treaty.

As these troubling developments suggest, the capacity of the Egyptian state has also fundamentally declined. The Egyptian economy is in dire straits: foreign reserves have dropped 60 percent, foreign direct investment has fallen by 90 percent, and this year’s budget deficit is 10.4 percent of GDP – America’s is 7.6 percent – and trending upwards. Furthermore, Egypt’s military regime and the Muslim Brotherhood are focused inward on reestablishing order and consolidating political control. Any warlike move by an Islamist-led Egypt would trigger the elimination of the American military aid that currently funds nearly 40 percent of Egypt’s defense budget. The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.

Israel’s concerns about a volatile Syria also belie the advantages reaped by a damaged Syria. Concerned about the potential transfer of Syrian Scuds or chemical weapons to Hezbollah, Israel is apprehensive of both a last ditch attempt by Assad to embroil it in war or by the possible ascent of another Islamist regime.

However, irrespective of Assad’s ability to cling to power, post-uprising Syria will also be a shell of its former self. Like Egypt, its economy is in tatters, having been hit hard by Western sanctions on its oil industry, which accounts for 30 percent of its budget. Its’ army has suffered large defections and losses at the hands of the rebels and its’ patron, Iran, has invested massively in propping up its sole regional ally. Even Hezbollah, aware of its current tenuous position in the Lebanese powder keg, finds itself increasingly isolated, having sided with Assad. Israel’s northern border has never been quieter.

Even in Gaza, where Hamas is ensconced, Israel’s successful deployment of the game-changing Iron Dome missile defense system has revolutionized the security situation, resulting in no Israeli casualties due to rocket fire thus far this year. Hamas abandoned its cozy headquarters in Damascus, fearful of aligning itself with the heretical Alawite sect against its Sunni Muslim brothers, and continues the political tug-of-war with Fatah in the West Bank. Even beyond Israel’s immediate borders, the “Arab Spring” has uncorked ethno-religious conflicts. PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) attacks on Turkish military targets have spiked, fighting continues between Arab, African, and Berber tribesmen in Libya, and two new independent states have been declared, the Tuareg state of Azawad in northwestern Mali and South Sudan, marking the first loss of “Arab” sovereignty in 45 years.

Even as it rightly plans for the changes wrought by the “Arab Spring,” Israel should also recognize that as the Middle East convulses, it is more likely to be left alone. As Alawites battle Arab Sunnis and Kurds in Syria, as Kurds target Turks in Turkey, as the Imazighen fight Arabs in Libya, as the Army contends with Islamists in Egypt, and as Sunnis and Christians confront Shiites in Lebanon, people don’t have the time, energy, or resources to fight the Jews in Israel. The more the region tears itself apart, the more Israel floats to the top, unscathed economically, militarily, or diplomatically. While an Islamist ascent is undesirable, the intervening disorder only makes Israel stronger.

 

 

JINSA: Arab Spring disorder makes Israel stronger

­By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
July 16, 2012

In a July 11 article on the JINSA website, visiting fellow Gabriel M. Scheinmann confirms what readers of The Passionate Attachment have known for some time:

Although the initial flickers of liberalism have been subsumed by the Islamist bonfire, the so-called “Arab Spring” has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other. While Arab capitals burn, Jerusalem has calmly and carefully steeled itself against the possible immediate deleterious effects, building fences along its Egyptian and Jordanian borders and accelerating the deployment of its Iron Dome anti-missile system. Whereas Arab states remain mired in internal political, economic, and military turmoil, Israel hums along, its economy intact – tourism is at an all-time high – its military untested, and its government united.

For three decades, Mubarak’s Egypt was the anchor of Israel’s regional security. Since his ouster, the lawless Sinai has been the source of rocket attacks, Egypt has canceled its gas contract with Israel, Israel’s Cairo embassy staff barely survived an attempted mob lynching and the Muslim Brotherhood has issued disquieting verbal volleys against the peace treaty.

As these troubling developments suggest, the capacity of the Egyptian state has also fundamentally declined. The Egyptian economy is in dire straits: foreign reserves have dropped 60 percent, foreign direct investment has fallen by 90 percent, and this year’s budget deficit is 10.4 percent of GDP – America’s is 7.6 percent – and trending upwards. Furthermore, Egypt’s military regime and the Muslim Brotherhood are focused inward on reestablishing order and consolidating political control. Any warlike move by an Islamist-led Egypt would trigger the elimination of the American military aid that currently funds nearly 40 percent of Egypt’s defense budget. The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.

Israel’s concerns about a volatile Syria also belie the advantages reaped by a damaged Syria. Concerned about the potential transfer of Syrian Scuds or chemical weapons to Hezbollah, Israel is apprehensive of both a last ditch attempt by Assad to embroil it in war or by the possible ascent of another Islamist regime.

However, irrespective of Assad’s ability to cling to power, post-uprising Syria will also be a shell of its former self. Like Egypt, its economy is in tatters, having been hit hard by Western sanctions on its oil industry, which accounts for 30 percent of its budget. Its’ army has suffered large defections and losses at the hands of the rebels and its’ patron, Iran, has invested massively in propping up its sole regional ally. Even Hezbollah, aware of its current tenuous position in the Lebanese powder keg, finds itself increasingly isolated, having sided with Assad. Israel’s northern border has never been quieter.

Even in Gaza, where Hamas is ensconced, Israel’s successful deployment of the game-changing Iron Dome missile defense system has revolutionized the security situation, resulting in no Israeli casualties due to rocket fire thus far this year. Hamas abandoned its cozy headquarters in Damascus, fearful of aligning itself with the heretical Alawite sect against its Sunni Muslim brothers, and continues the political tug-of-war with Fatah in the West Bank. Even beyond Israel’s immediate borders, the “Arab Spring” has uncorked ethno-religious conflicts. PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) attacks on Turkish military targets have spiked, fighting continues between Arab, African, and Berber tribesmen in Libya, and two new independent states have been declared, the Tuareg state of Azawad in northwestern Mali and South Sudan, marking the first loss of “Arab” sovereignty in 45 years.

Even as it rightly plans for the changes wrought by the “Arab Spring,” Israel should also recognize that as the Middle East convulses, it is more likely to be left alone. As Alawites battle Arab Sunnis and Kurds in Syria, as Kurds target Turks in Turkey, as the Imazighen fight Arabs in Libya, as the Army contends with Islamists in Egypt, and as Sunnis and Christians confront Shiites in Lebanon, people don’t have the time, energy, or resources to fight the Jews in Israel. The more the region tears itself apart, the more Israel floats to the top, unscathed economically, militarily, or diplomatically. While an Islamist ascent is undesirable, the intervening disorder only makes Israel stronger.

It appears that Carl Gershman, Peter Ackerman, Jared Cohen, et al. knew what they were doing after all when they helped unleash the supposedly Israel-threatening Arab democratic wave. As no doubt did Israeli President Shimon Peres when during an April 2011 visit to Washington he urged aid to the “the awakening of the Arab world.”

 


Syria’s Destruction to Create a Greater Israel: The Ugly Truth

 

Israel is the only real winner of the so-called ‘Arab Spring’

with 2 comments
By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
August 18, 2012

Award-winning Iranian journalist Kourosh Ziabari recently interviewed me about the ongoing destabilization of the Middle East and North Africa commonly referred to as the Arab Spring.

KZ: In a recent article in the Washington Post, Charles Krauthammer wrote that the SCAF hastily dissolved the Egyptian parliament because the majority of members of parliament elected in the post-Mubarak elections were Islamists. Does Mohammad Morsi’s acceptance of the military council’s decision denote that he might be inclined toward the West? The U.S. Secretary of State Clinton has just paid a visit to Egypt and met with President Morsi. Are these signs indicative of the fact that Morsi has a pro-Western attitude and may betray the Egyptian Revolution?

MÓC: First of all, I don’t believe that there was a genuine revolution in Egypt in the first place. Like the “colour revolutions” in Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine and elsewhere, the so-called “Arab Spring” was orchestrated by the regime change specialists at the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict and the wider network of groups engaged in what is euphemistically called “democracy promotion.” While the mainstream media cannot openly admit this, they have given some strong hints. For example, a New York Times report in April 2011, aptly entitled “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” acknowledged that “as American officials and others look back at the uprisings of the Arab Spring, they are seeing that the United States’ democracy-building campaigns played a bigger role in fomenting protests than was previously known, with key leaders of the movements having been trained by the Americans in campaigning, organizing through new media tools and monitoring elections.” Unless we are to believe that these “democracy-building campaigns” were not intended to undermine authoritarian regimes like Mubarak’s, then there’s no “revolution” for the American-educated Morsi to betray. Interestingly, it appears that it was Krauthammer, a Guardian of Zion awardee, who was the first to use the term “Arab Spring.” In the same 2005 piece, he presciently wrote, “The democracy project is, of course, just beginning.”

KZ: What will be, in your view, the attitude of the new government in Egypt toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Prior to the elections, the Israelis were extremely worried that an Islamist president might revoke the Camp David Accords. However, Morsi hasn’t decided to do so. Will the new government in Egypt support the Palestinian resistance front?

MÓC: One has to distinguish between what Israeli officials say publicly and what they think privately. If Tel Aviv was genuinely worried about an Islamist government revoking the Camp David Accords, then why has its American lobby been so supportive of a democratic transition to civilian rule in Cairo, knowing full well that this would increase the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood? A recent article featured on the website of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) gives a clearer insight into Israeli strategic thinking. Entitled “Is Israel the Winner of the Arab Spring?” the piece concludes that “the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ has, paradoxically, made Israel stronger as Israel’s enemies have turned on each other.” As the JINSA fellow astutely observes, “The Egyptian body politic may indeed be more hostile to the Jewish State, but its capabilities for acting on that hostility have markedly declined.”

Read the rest of this entry »

 

‘Prisoner of Zion’ Promoting Arab Democracy @Google in 2010

 

~~~~S Y R I E~~~~

 

Comme BHL, Israël demande une « intervention massive » en Syrie.

Pour BHL, on s’en serait douté: « une intervention en Syrie est inévitable » …

Quelles leçons faut-il tirer des fantasmes guerriers de Bernard Henry Lévy (BHL) ?

Le sayan BHL ne sait pas écrire, mais son officier traitant sait compter…

http://fr.sott.net/image/image/s5/104583/full/le_serment_de_tobrouk_bhl.jpg

Syrie: « une intervention massive » (Israël)

(AFP) Le vice-ministre israélien des Affaires étrangères, Danny Ayalon, a estimé aujourd’hui à Paris que la communauté internationale devait préparer « une intervention massive » en Syrie, pour éviter « une extension du conflit au Liban et en Irak ». « Plus on attend, plus il y aura de chaos et de victimes. Il n’y a pas grand chose qu’Israël puisse faire, c’est au peuple syrien, à l’Occident et à la Russie de trouver une solution pour arrêter les massacres », a dit à quelques journalistes Danny Ayalon, lors d’une visite en France. 

« La solution la plus efficace serait une intervention massive de la communauté internationale, sur le modèle de ce qui s’est passé en Bosnie », a-t-il poursuivi, évoquant le déploiement d’une force armée d’interposition. « Il est nécessaire d’y associer tous les pays concernés, y compris et surtout la Russie. Il faudra certainement trouver une solution pour (le président) Bachar el-Assad et sa famille », a souligné Ayalon. 

« Si rien ne se passe, il y a un grand risque d’une extension du conflit au Liban et en Irak, deux pays qui partagent de nombreuses similitudes avec la Syrie », a mis en garde le ministre, qui devait s’entretenir dans la journée avec le chef de la diplomatie française Laurent Fabius. Le président israélien Shimon Peres avait déclaré le 10 juin qu’il souhaitait la victoire des rebelles en Syrie. Israël est formellement en état de guerre avec la Syrie, son voisin au nord, mais la frontière entre les deux pays n’a connu aucun incident notable depuis la fin de la guerre israélo-arabe en octobre 1973.

La Syrie est en proie depuis mars 2011 à une révolte sans précédent contre le régime de Bachar el-Assad. Selon l’Observatoire syrien des droits de l’Homme (OSDH), la répression et les combats entre armée et rebelles ont déjà fait plus de 15.000 morts, en majorité des civils.

—-

Pour aller plus loin :

- Les rebelles syriens et l’AIPAC

- Les rebelles syriens et la CIA

The Yinon Thesis Vindicated: Neocons, Israel, and the Fragmentation of Syria

How the Israel lobby’s anti-Beijing startup now aids Syria’s rebels By Maidhc Ó Cathail

WINEP provides forum for Syrian National Council — and cover for Israel

Bill Kristol and the Emergency Committee for Israel – liars, or very forgetful?

America’s interest in Syria is Israel

Israel may use military force ‘to secure’ Syria’s alleged chemical arsenal

Israel’s Peres says he hopes Syrian rebels “will win”

Israel wants airstrikes against Syria: Analyst

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

Military: Syria Chemical Stocks Threaten Israel

Does Israel really fear Jihad terrorism from a post-Assad Syria?

JINSA: Arab Spring disorder makes Israel stronger

La CIA et le Mossad préparent le renversement du gouvernement syrien

Israel Wants The Syrian Government to Fall

US, Israel plan Assad removal to hurt Iran: Analyst

Hidden US-Israeli Military Agenda: « Break Syria into Pieces » by Michel Chossudovsky

Israel has been planing the destruction of Syria for over 30 years. Israel has been planing the destruction of Syria for over 30 years. I suggest people read Zionist and Israeli Dual National Richard « Mr. PNAC » Pearl’s 1996 paper, « A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing The Realm » he presented to none other that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Or, look 30 years back at an Israeli document entitled, « A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties by Oded Yinon » in which Israel calls for sectarian balkanization of Syria and other neighboring Arabic countries in order to secure the survival of the Zionist regime.

‘We’ll Arm the Syrian Rebels – But Only Those Who Share Our Values’

BBC Finds Crates of Saudi Weapons in Syrian Rebel Base

NATO ready to defend Turkey against Syrian attacks

Turkey controlled by Israel, US pro-Zionist lobby: Analyst

Journalist Almost Assasinated for Exposing Turkey Delivering Weapons to Syrian Rebels

Mitt Romney: arm the Syrian rebels

Assad in rare appearance: Enemy has Israeli weapons

VIDEO – RT . Fabius veut armer les terroristes en Syrie S/T (pas le même vidéo que celui de l’autre jour! même si la nouvelle est quasiment la même)

Syria Rebels Declare Civilian Aircraft Legitimate Targets France Mulls Sending Anti-Aircraft Weapons to Rebel Factions

West Seeks Destruction of Syrian Nation

Hezbollah denounces Syria state channels ban Hezbollah on Thursday condemned the decision taken by Arab satellite operators to suspend the transmission of Syrian state channels.

Dem Chairman says Christians « Want Jews to Die and Convert »

VIDEO – Israel: Sheep Lead to The Slaughter: Ken O’Keefe and Mark Glenn

US and Israel Use Propaganda and Proxy War in Syria to Pave Path Toward Iran

France to give heavy artillery to Syria rebels to ‘smash Assad regime’

AUDIO – Syrie: Fabius intreviewé par El Kabbach

Syrian rebels give airlines ’72-hour warning’ before they plan to seize civilian airports

Exclusive: Who Are The Terrorists? What The Media Wont Tell You Exclusive rebel interviews detailing Saudi Arabia’s Salafi Jihad operations reveal details Uncle Sam doesn’t want you to know and the media won’t tell you.
First hand accounts of rebel operations reveal Saudi Arabia is funding terrorists recruited from Salafi schools who are answering an open call from the Saudi Prince’s anointed Prophet’s to wage Jihad against Syria.

Saudi Arabia Paying Terrorists Up To $3,000/Mo To Jihad Against Syria

Putin Warns: Long Civil War in Syria If Assad Unconstitutionally Ousted

Des armes chimiques en provenance de Libye aux mains des « opposants » syriens ?

Canadian media Supports Foreign Terrorists in Syria

U.S. Senators McCain, Lieberman, Graham urge tougher stand on Syria, Iran At a gathering of political, business leaders in Italy, McCain blasted President Obama, who defeated him in the 2008 presidential election, for recently setting the ‘red line’ for Syria at use of chemical weapons.

Al-Qaeda Leader Strikes Deal With U.S., Saudis To Send 5,000 Jihadists To Syria

US-Saudi Backed Al Qaeda Proxy Cells Now Waging Jihad Against Russia

Syrian minister accuses Mossad of assassinating Syrians

France, western allies prepare response to Syrian use of chemical weapons

BBC Scrubs Video Of US Backed Syria Rebels Committing War Crimes

Pentagon reportedly seeking to avert Israeli strike on Syrian chemical weapon sites

Washington Begins to Plan for Collapse of Syrian Government, pushes Israel not to attack Syria

Syrie : François Hollande, occupez-vous du chômage au lieu de Bachar Al-Assad !

Syrian group with close ties to FSA terrorists openly arms rebels with help of U.S.

SAA finds Israel-made weapons and grenades in FSA hideout.

War crime? Syrian rebels execute POWs (GRAPHIC VIDEO)

VIDEO – I saw rebels beheading men for religion’- Syrian cleric

Assad vows Syria will defeat ‘foreign conspiracy’

Britain and US Plan Syrian “Revolution” From Istanbul

Syrie : les puissances impérialistes (anciennes contre nouvelles) transforment une révolte populaire du monde arabe en guerre inter-impérialiste

Syrian Rebels Claim to Take Over Chemical Weapons

Syrian FM– ‘We believe that the USA is the major player against Syria and the rest are its instruments’

Réseaux d’envoi de combattants Britanniques en Syrie

VIDEO – BHL: Choutzpah d’or!

« L’armée rebelle ? C’est une bande d’étrangers… » par Robert Fisk, excellent reporter, pas un phony comme Bollyn…

Western Troops are inside Syria Report: 200 British SAS Forces « Hunting for WMDs »

BREAKING: British Military Base in Cyprus Used for « Syrian Operation »

Syrian Christians in 2-week blockade by rebel fighters, residents desperate

Loin de s’effondrer, le régime syrien est passé à l’offensive

Why Syria will not Fall: Crushing Defeat of « Free Syrian Army »

Syria conflict: ‘Scores of bodies found’ near Damascus

France: Le président Hollande rencontre l’« opposition » syrienne soutenue par les Etats-Unis

France ready for Syrian intervention without UN

Syrie: Les États-Unis légalisent le financement du terrorisme

VIDÉO : L’Armée Syrienne “Libre” transforme ses prisonniers en kamikazes

Terrorisme d’État – des journalistes occidentaux suivent « al-Qaïda » en Syrie

Syria’s Destruction Will Ensure US and Israeli Strategic Advantage for Iranian Strike

Alain Soral sur l’éventuelle guerre Israël-Iran et les déclarations de Laurent Fabius contre le président syrien

VIDEO – BBC – les rebelles syriens de l’armée de libération syrienne… sont en réalité des tortionnaires

Syrian Military is Winning – Ziad Fadel – Syrian Commentator

AUDIO – Mark Glenn: Press TV News & Analysis–Israel war threat on Syria a planned move to force US to follow and undermine UN

Syria jihadist fighters and mercenaries eye formation of Islamic State

VIDEO – PHOTOS FROM SYRIA ~ WARNING !!! BEYOND GRAPHIC!!!

Jihadists Striving for Autocratic Theocracy Make Up Syrian Rebels

Big Powers Move In On Syria: WW3 Set To Blow?

‘Israel master of puppets in Syria unrest’

Israel Invents Syrian WMD Threat, IDF Commanders Threaten Intervention

‘Assad will use chemical weapons’

‘WMD’ + ‘ethnic cleansings’ = case to bomb Syria? (IRAQ, LIBYA, ALL OVER AGAIN)

Syrian rebels aim to use chemical weapons, blame Damascus – report

Syria forces seize Israel-made arms from rebels

False Flag Alert: US Claims Syria « Moving Nerve Gas Out of Storage »

« Democracy Now » and the « Progressive » Alternative Media: Valued Cheerleaders For Imperialism and War

VIDEO: « Panetta has Blood on his Hands for Supporting Syrian Rebels »

VIDEO: America’s « War under the Table » in Syria: Former Blackwater Mercenaries Training FSA Terrorists

‘British-born jihadists fighting Assad in Syria’ – captured photographer

US Authorizes Financial Support to Free Syrian Army

Christians threatened by Free Syrian Army seek Government Protection

Armed groups in Syria receive weapons from Israel

John McCain–’Shameful’ that US is not arming Syrian thugs

CIA officers regulating arms traffic to Syria opposition groups

CONFIRMED: US CIA Arming Terrorists in Syria

UK, US spying for Syrian rebels: Report

US « Intelligence Assets » leading the Syrian « Opposition », the Role of the Bilderberg and the CFR

Syria massacre dead mostly rebels, activists say

Les crimes de l’ « Armée syrienne libre » que les médias traditionnels cachent
Third Russian-Chinese Veto Blocks the Road to World War III

Syria crisis: Turkey training rebels, says FSA fighter

Syria Rebels Face Growing List of Crimes

Towards A « Soft Invasion »? The Launching of a « Humanitarian War » against Syria

Massacres in Aleppo by Western-armed « Free Syrian Army »

Syrie : absence de diplomatie et destruction

Kidnapped Syrian TV host executed by rebels

Report: MEK to join terrorists in Syria

Hassan Nasrallah sur la Syrie

Syria Strategy looks like Bloody Repeat

SYRIA: Criminal Propagandists: Killing Civilians as Part of a « Humanitarian Mandate »

CRIMES MEDIATIQUES ou les conséquences meurtrières de la désinformation

FLASHBACK juin 2011: La déstabilisation de la Syrie et la guerre élargie au Moyen-Orient

Syrie : Des mensonges qui ne changeront pas la dure réalité pour l’Occident

SYRIE : Cinq longues minutes de vérité sur la Cinq

Syrian Liberators, Bearing Toy Guns

U.N. Observers In Syria Suspend Mission After Escalating Violence

US backtracks on claims Russia is arming Syrian regime

Saudi Arabia plans to fund Syria rebel army

Syria arrests over 40 Germans for smuggling arms to rebels

Turkey denies arms shipment to Syria opposition

U.S. says weighing ‘next steps’ with partners on Syria

U.S. military completes initial planning for Syria

Imran Hossein–NATO Wants Turkey To Invade Syria

War Escalation: ‘Turkey probing Syrian anti-air defense’

Un avion turc abattu par l’armée syrienne : Quid des milliers de Syriens abattus par les forces pro-turques ?

Turkey to ‘consult’ NATO allies after Syria downs fighter jet

Turkey warns Syria: Any solider who approaches border will be seen as a threat

Turkey dubs Syria ‘a clear threat’, vows to retaliate

Syrian forces ‘fire at second Turkish plane’

BRIT FIGHTER JETS PUT ON SYRIA ALERT

Syria warns NATO against action over Turkish plane 

US to help Turkey hold Syria ‘accountable’

Turkey admits downed plane had strayed into Syrian airspace

Turkish PM vows to help ‘liberate Syria from dictatorship’

Washington and Ankara Intelligence Op? Syria Blamed for Turkish Provocation

Report: Turkey deploys tanks on Syrian border; Assad says country in a ‘real state of war’

Syria shot down a Turkish plane believing it was an Israeli plane, a Syrian government minister said.

Graphic video: Syrian family ‘slain by rebels’ in Hama massacre

Syrian rebels accused of massacre after seven die in attack on TV station

Hamas member killed in Syria, Mossad suspected

The U.S. & Syria: Facts you should know

Condoleezza Rice calls on U.S. to arm Syria rebels

GRTV: Covert War Waged Against Syria Analyzing Turkey’s role, foreign influence and the Free Syrian Army

Explosion in Iran-Turkey gas pipeline

What Russia Fears in Syrian Conflict

France says Geneva Syria plans implies Assad must go

Russian specialists involved in Syria intercepting Turkish jet, sources say

Doubts cast on Turkey’s Story of Jet dropped by Syria

Whose Spring? The CIA’s Hand In The Rise of Islamists And International Terrorist Groups

Regime-Changers’ Report Card

VIDEO – CIA, MI6 agents direct massacres in Syria: American analyst (avec Stephen Lendman, juif pas juifiste)

John Bolton: Syria, World War and the destruction of America

Syrian Foreign Minister–’We are not in Civil War but rather fighting terrorists’

VIDEO – Thierry Meyssan sur le projet de coup d’État médiatique en Syrie

Un nouveau massacre en Syrie Nouvelles révélations sur les victimes de Houla.

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrian rebels’ arsenal includes remote-controlled truck bombs

US accelerates preparations for ‘no-fly zone’ in Syria

‘Dozens of Kuwaiti jihadists’ join different nationalities to enlist in Free Syrian Army

Insurgents Named Responsible for Syrian Massacres

Syrie: l’OTAN prépare une vaste opération d’intoxication

L’affaire de Houla illustre le retard du renseignement occidental en Syrie

« Humanitarian War Criminals » in High Office: Was the Houla Massacre Ordered by the Western Military Alliance?

Propaganda War: The Houla Massacre Committed by The West’s “Free Syrian Army” But They Accuse Syrian Gov’t

Pro-Assads were ‘picked’ by killers in Houla massacre: US author

UK to set up camps inside Syria to help rebels

‘US, Israel plot to topple al-Assad Govt’

How not to stop the violence in Syria — Elie Wiesel’s latest bright idea

LOL!!! Netanyahu–Assad slaughtering Syrian civilians with the aid of Iran, Hezbollah

Report: Rebels Responsible for Houla Massacre

SYRIE : Les rebelles sont responsables du massacre de Houla

Le narratif syrien de l’Occident se base sur “un mec dans un appartement au Royaume-Uni” Un propagandiste de l’opposition syrienne dans un appartement en Angleterre, la seule source citée par la presse occidentale

Advanced State of Readiness: US Military Lobbies for War with Syria

SYRIA: NATO’s Next « Humanitarian » War? ONLINE INTERACTIVE I-BOOK

Chantage contre la Russie : les États-Unis promeuvent les massacres pour justifier la guerre contre la Syrie

La Syrie au programme du Bilderberg

The Houla Hoaxsters

Clinton: Russia Must Embrace Regime Change in Syria

Russia won’t permit foreign intervention in Syria

In address to parliament, Assad blames Syria crisis on ‘outside forces’

Antiwar.com yet again obscures Israel’s role in Syria

VIDEO – BHL, le juif éternel fauteur de guerres

VIDEO – BHL:«Je suis le représentant de la tribu d’Israël»

VIDEO – BHL reconnaît une intervention israelienne en Libye

Oh la la, BBC : Une photo d’Irak pour illustrer le massacre de Houla ?

Le massacre de Houla était planifié et a été instrumentalisé

MEDIA DISINFORMATION: West Desperately Attempts to Spin Syrian Crisis

SYRIA, Atrocities were not committed by the government but by armed gangs Vatican News Service refutes Western media reports

UN Report on Houla Massacre Conflicts With Rebel Accounts

Russian Journalist Exposes Propaganda Lies about Houla Massacre- by Stephen Lendman

Syrian President Assad vows to keep fighting Western-backed terrorists

Le massacre de Houla fait partie du nettoyage ethnique du gouvernorat d’Homs prévu comme base arrière pour l’ASL

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

May 28 2012: 108 Syrians Killed Just prior to Annan’s meeting with Assad (ce massacre a pouvait pas être un hasard, programmé pour affaiblir Assad juste avant sa rencontre avec des émissaires de l’ONU!!)

US senators McCain, Lieberman urge arming Syrian opposition

US Blames Russia, Iran for Upcoming Syria War

Blackwater agents involved in Syria unrest

French president says Syria’s Assad has to go

UN-backed action in Syria is an option, Hollande says

Romney Calls for Action on Syria, but His Party Is Divided

The BBC’s Photo Fib of a Syrian Massacre (des images de bébés irakiens tués détournées pour fins de propagande: pour illustrer des tueries en Syrie…)

Netanyahu: Israel ‘appalled’ by Syria massacre; Iran and Hezbollah must also be held responsible (Il ne s’est pas montré aussi inquiet lors des bombardements de civils libanais – incluant bien sûr femmes et enfants – lors de l’attaque israélienne contre le Liban en 2006.)

Rebels behind Houla massacre, US plan to destabilize Syria in full swing

The Houla Massacre: US-Sponsored Terrorists « Killed Families Loyal to the Government »

VIDEO – Jean Marie Le Pen sur la Syrie, l’Iran et l’arme nucléaire

The Crusade for Syria: A Big Lie

NATO’s ‘Civil War’ Machine Rolls Into Syria

Unholy Alliance Forming Against Syria Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara, Brussels, Arab puppet regimes, Extremist Wahhabis, Al-Qaeda

Syrie : Des massacres « préparés » pour torpiller le processus politique

Syria Under Attack by Globalist Death Squad Experts

SYRIE. Opération terroriste appuyée par les États-Unis: Tuer des civils innocents pour justifier une guerre humanitaire

Top IDF officer: Terrorist threat in Syria could be directed at Israel: The deterioration of Syria’s central regime could lead to a growing terrorist threat against Israel, a top Israel Defense Minister said…

Que reste-t-il du printemps arabe ? Des espérances trahies.

The Arab Spring story in a nutshell: Fake springs, post-modern coup d’etat

Pourquoi les Etats-Unis arment-ils Al-Qaïda en Syrie ?

Syrian Troops Find Mass Grave, Blame Rebels

Fifty US, French, British Spies in Turkey “Working Very Closely on Syria Issue”

Les États-Unis : pourvoyeurs de terroristes et fauteurs de guerre en Syrie

Zionist Operative working as an aide to Romney: Obama “dragged his feet” on Syria

 

Sur ce blog:

AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT CONTRE LE GVT SYRIEN!

‘A CLEAN BREAK’: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient

Un esclave des Bronfman-Rothschild, John McCain, menace Poutine: « Cher Vlad, le #printemps arabe s’en vient dans un quartier près de chez vous »

La soif de sang frénétique de John McCain: après la mort de Kadhafi, les « dictateurs » comme Assad, Poutine, les Chinois doivent avoir peur…

John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »

« De la dictature à la démocratie »

L’American Jewish Committee derrière les mensonges humanitaires qui ont rendu possible la guerre en Libye

L’actuel président du National Endowment for Democracy, le marionnettiste du « printemps arabe », serait un ancien de l’ADL

Ron Paul explique le non-interventionnisme dans les affaires étrangères

Philip Zelikow (signataire du PNAC): La Libye est un modèle pour la redivision du Moyen-Orient

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Netanyahou: « Nous vaincrons l’Islam militant »

Netanyahou est confiant qu’un jour Israël et ses alliés occidentaux vaincront l’Islam, propageront la démocratie aux quatre coins du monde et débarrasseront le monde des armes de mort massive. (Son papa BenZion Netanyahou avait soi-disant prédit que « l’Islam militant » ferait un jour tomber les tours jumelles du WTC)
Netanyhu–We’ll beat ‘militant Islam by end of century’

BHL veut faire réécrire le Coran par un juif Le criminel de guerre et fervent partisan du Grand Israël, Bernard-Henri Lévy a déclaré qu’il souhaitait voir le Saint Coran réécrit et, de plus, par un juif.

En passant, l’arrivée de partis islamistes au pouvoir n’a rien à voir avec une quelconque islamisation du monde blanc européen. Ça a plutôt à voir avec le fait que Israël a besoin de se donner une légitimité aux yeux du monde pour envahir ses voisins. C’est pourquoi il importe pour Israël de remplacer les dirigeants de ses pays voisins par des « islamistes intégristes », justifiant ainsi leur invasion par les troupes sionistes et permettant ainsi la réalisation du GRAND ISRAËL, base terrestre de l’empire planétaire d’Israël.

 

Petit problème, Bibi! C’est que maintenant le public peut savoir (grâce à des documents déclassifiés) que tes amis les Bronfman, ces gangsters milliardaires recyclés dans la distillerie et l’industrie du divertissement, qui ont secrètement financé Israël et son arsenal de mort, savent tout ce qu’il y a à savoir sur la production d’armes biologiques — privilège dont ils jouissent depuis qu’ils ont financé la production d’Anthrax (assez pour tuer 30 fois la population mondiale) au Canada durant la Seconde guerre mondiale. Il s’agit des mêmes Bronfman qui, des décennies plus tard, (més)useront de leur pouvoir afin que soient éjectés de leur poste les généraux opposés à la guerre en Irak.

Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer announce new anti-Islam ad

Fox News Contributor: “A High Percentage” Of Muslims “Hate Christians And Jews”; “The Real Problem Is The Quran”

Demonizing Muslims. America’s Worldwide Witch Hunt Heading into a « World War III Scenario »?

VIDEO – LES IDIOTS UTILES DE LA PROPAGANDE JUIVE INTERNATIONALE DU CLASH DES CIVILISATION LANCENT LA Déclaration de Bruxelles, qui établit une ligne d’action stratégique  contrant le programme islamique d’imposition mondiale de la Charia.
Il faut vraiment être un attardé mental pour penser que l’Islam a un programme d’imposition mondiale de la Charia! Ils veulent juste avoir le droit de légiférer par exemple les mariages et les divorces selon la loi musulmane – pas question de l’imposer aux non-musulmans! Pareil comme on impose pas les principes chrétiens catholiques aux non-cathos! Notez que le mariage a toujours été un fait religieux – l’union de deux êtres qui s’aiment scellée dans l’Esprit… D’ailleurs à quoi ça sert qu’un mariage soit scellé par l’État, sauf pour obtenir des avantages légaux et financiers?! $$$$$$$$$ Ça c’est bien l’Occident impie! L’État n’a pas à sceller l’union spirituelle de deux êtres, l’État est là pour défendre nos DROITS. Dans presque toutes les cultures incluant la nôtre qui est séculaire depuis pas très longtemps!, le mariage a toujours été un fait religieux, pareil comme nous ici la madame préfère souvent se marier en blanc à l’Église — et il y a pas si longtemps fallait se justifier face à la foi catholique pour avoir le droit de divorcer (c’est en leur tordant le bras qu’on a obtenu de l’Église le droit de divorcer, et on l’a obtenu tout simplement parce que plus personne ne tient l’Église en autorité étant donné que pu personne ne pratique!). Les musulmans sont juste pas des impies comme qui déféquons sans gêne sur notre héritage spirituel et ancestral.  Toute personne qui embarque dans ce prétendu « Clash des civilisations » et en fait la promotion doit être mise hors d’état de nuire, de façon civilisée mais avec rigueur et fermeté.

 

 

THE MYTH OF THE MUSLIM TIDE

http://muslimtide.com/

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1242434–popular-anti-muslim-myths-busted-in-new-book

http://www.straight.com/article-764521/vancouver/douglas-saunders-delivers-impressive-rebuttal-rightwing-fear-mongers-myth-muslim-tide

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/debunking-the-myth-of-the-stealth-jihad/article4511675/

EXCERPT:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/08/29/book-excerpt-the-muslim-tide-that-wasnt/

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/doug-saunders/doug-saunders-myth-of-the-muslim-tide_b_1837315.html

AUDIO:

http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2012/09/03/the-myth-of-the-muslim-tide/

 

Sur ce blog:

L’ancien responsable de l’Unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA estime que l’Islam radical est une menace imaginaire.

L’ancien directeur de l’unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA, Michael Scheuer accuse Israël de détenir le Congrès et d’entraîner les USA vers le désastre d’une guerre contre l’Iran

DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE, DEVOIR DE VITRIFIER L’IRAN

Inversion accusatoire : l’empire israélite accuse l’Iran d’être « la plus grave menace pour la paix dans le monde »

Larry SILVERSTEIN et David YERUSHALMI (gourou de l’anti-Islam aux USA), anciens patrons de l’épouse du candidat présidentiel Newt Gingrich

“Ils menacent de sanctions et de représailles militaires tous ceux qui émettent des doutes sur la Shoah et le 11 septembre » — Président Ahmadinejad

L’Iran ne croit pas la fable convenue du 11 septembre ; les États-Unis en mal de casus belli l’accusent d’avoir monté le coup

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Les massmédias antisémites? Le Washington Post rapporte que le virus Flame serait, comme Stuxnet, une cyber-arme us-israélienne contre l’Iran

 

WashPost – U.S., Israel developed Flame computer virus to slow Iranian nuclear efforts, officials say

 

Le virus informatique Flame créé par les Etats-Unis et « Israël » (presse)

L’équipe du site Al Manar

Levant définitivement le doute sur l’origine du virus informatique Flame, conçu pour dérober des informations sur le programme nucléaire iranien, le Washington Post, citant mardi, des « responsables occidentaux proches du dossier » vient d’affirmer qu’il est bel et bien une cyber-arme conçue par les Etats-Unis et l’entité sioniste.

La NSA américaine, chargée de l’espionnage informatique, et la CIA ont travaillé avec l’armée israélienne pour mettre au point ce programme informatique destiné à se répandre dans les réseaux informatiques iraniens, copier des fichiers, faire des captures d’écrans et renvoyer ces informations discrètement, selon le quotidien.

Les Etats-Unis et l’entité sioniste ont souvent été soupçonnés d’être à l’origine de Flame et d’un autre virus voisin, Stuxnet, qui s’est attaqué en 2010 aux centrifugeuses du programme nucléaire iranien.

Mais Washington refuse tout commentaire sur le sujet, se contentant d’affirmer qu’internet fait partie des domaines d’intérêt de la défense et du renseignement.

« Il s’agit de préparer le champ de bataille pour un autre type d’action clandestine », a affirmé au Washington Post un ancien haut responsable américain du renseignement à propos de Flame.

Le virus Flame a été détecté dans différentes régions du monde, notamment le Moyen-Orient, l’Europe, l’Amérique du Nord et l’Asie-Pacifique, l’Iran étant le premier pays visé par ces attaques.

Il existait depuis quatre ans, mais il n’avait été identifié que fin mai par le fabricant russe d’anti-virus Kaspersky Lab, qui avait noté que la sophistication de ce virus utilisé à des fins de « cyber-espionnage » était telle qu’il supposait le concours d’un Etat.

Cyber warfare

Why is Israel suddenly speaking so openly about cyber-warfare? The Israel Defense Forces Spokesman’s website is not usually in the business of breaking stories, so Sunday’s report defining…

US, Israel wrote Stuxnet, officials say

Israel suspected of ‘cyberweapon’ strike on Middle East computers

Stuxnet : un ver créé par les Etats-Unis et Israël

US unleashed Stuxnet cyber war on Iran to appease Israel

Breaking news: NY Times claims US released Stuxnet with Israel and it accidentally escaped

Stuxnet leak prompts US House to consider prosecution of journalists

Computer Virus named after Islamic Messiah found in Iranian and Israeli systems

“Netanyahu has Decided to Attack Iran Before the U.S. Elections in November”
Henry Kissinger, upon receiving Israel’s presidential award from Israeli President Shimon Peres, said the moment of truth on the Iran question will be in the months ahead.

L’Empire britannique [lire: Israël et la communauté organisée] planifie une guerre thermonucléaire et promeut « ses terroristes » !

CONFRONTING IRAN, « PROTECTING ISRAEL »: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria

 

 

Sur ce blog:

Netanyahou accuse le New York Times et Haaretz de donner le ton de la campagne anti-Israël à travers le monde

Même Reuters n’est pas à l’abri du congrès juif européen et de son président milliardaire

LE GOUVERNEMENT CANADIEN SAIT COMMENT PLAIRE À SON MAÎTRE ET SE PORTE VOLONTAIRE POUR RAYER L’IRAN DE LA CARTE ADVENANT LE CAS OÙ LES USA REFUSERAIENT DE LE FAIRE

L’ancien directeur de l’unité de traque de Ben Laden à la CIA, Michael Scheuer accuse Israël de détenir le Congrès et d’entraîner les USA vers le désastre d’une guerre contre l’Iran

 

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

À voir

 

Remerciements bien mérités à tous ceux et celles qui ont contribué à rendre ces vidéos disponibles sur le Net gratuitement, plus spécialement merci à l’équipe du Savoisien

Homo Toxicus (English)

The Fluoride Deception: Amy Goodman w/ Christopher Bryson

Le jeu de l’argent

Die Rothschilds Aktien auf Waterloo – 1940 [ENG SUB]

The Story Behind the Bernie Madoff Scandal – « The Gentiles did this to us! »

The Diamond Empire: The Oppenheimer Family Cartel and Artificial Scarcity

Human Trafficking in Israel

Bronfman Biography

MEYER LANSKY – GANGLAND : (-1- -2- -3- -4- -5-)

Rise and Fall of the Jewish Mafia : (-1- -2- -3- -4-)

MURDER INC. – GANGLAND : (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Victor Ostrovsky Ex Mossad Agent: (1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)

Michael Collins Piper – Final Judgment – JFK Assassination Israeli Connection

The Dark Side of the Anti-Defamation League (2e copie)

Diffamation (fr) (v.o.a.)

The Hatemongers Among Us

Jewish Media Supremacy (ch.5 from « Jewish Supremacism ») by David Duke

Is the Major Media Controlled? – Willis Carto

La Toile (Le Unabomber, le LSD et l’internet) (fr)The Net (v.o.a.)

Edward Bernays – Propaganda (fr)

AIPAC : Un oeil sur la planète. Le reportage de France 2 qui n’a pas plu à Israël

Le lobby pro-israélien aux USA (v.o.a.) (no narrator)

Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby

Le Canada sous influence: le poids du lobby pro-Israël à Ottawaretour sur le grand reportage

The Iraq War was Made for Israel, by Israeli-Firsters inside the Bush admin

The Neocon Agenda with Stephen Sniegoski

The War Party

Vendre la guerre aux Américains (v.f.) (War Made Easy V.O.A.)

Qui est derrière la propagande anti-Islam?

How Zionist Jews Invented Modern Terrorism

Proof Israel did 911 (télécharger)

911 was a Jew Job

5 Dancing Israelis Arrested on 911

Israel et le 11 septembre par Ryan Dawson v.f.

911: Les militaires américains savent qu’Israël a fait le coup (s-t fr)

The INSLAW Affair

L’arme secrète d’Israel (Mordecai Vanunu) en v.f.

Israel’s Secret Weapon (Mordecai Vanunu) (télécharger v.ang.)

Le nouveau désordre mondial (montage)

Jenin Jenin (2002)

People and the Land

Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land

The Rise of Israel’s Military RabbisPt2

Baruch Goldstein’s Massacre at the Jerusalem Mosque (télécharger)

Frontline: Israel’s Next War

God’s Jewish Warriors

Jérusalem: dérive radicale de deux rabbins

Rabbi Friedman: « Destroy Holy Sites (…) Kill the Men, Women and Children and Cattle

Le Betar Tagar de FranceLa milice juive de la LDJ s’entraîne dans des bâtiments protégés par la police française

Ciel Mon Mardi bagarre en direct (version courte)

La nouvelle extrême-droite et l’alliance sioniste contre l’Islam

The Bloody History of Communism (playlist)

The Jewish Hand in Bolshevism/Communism (Jura Lina)

La déclaration Balfour: la terre promise en échange que les Juifs poussent les États-Unis en guerre

Bronfman a financé et supervisé la production d’assez d’Anthrax pour exterminer 30 fois la pop mondiale

28 avril 1939 : Hitler évoque le cas de la Palestine

Hitler contre les usuriers internationaux

Adolf Hitler – ‘We Shall Crush the Freemasons!’

Adolf Hitler: Our enemies today face the entire German Volk!

International Jewry Won WWII Their Purim

Les dossiers secrets du nazisme – VENGEANCE (Empoisonner les Allemands)

L’extrémiste François Genoud: De Hitler à Carlos – National Socialiste Suisse

Le 11 septembre et le retour du révisionnisme

The Karma of Untruthfulness Documentary – feat. Terry Boardman (Rudolf Steiner media studies)

A Holocaust Inquiry (ch.12 from Jewish Supremacism) by David Duke

Le Phénomène Herman Rosenblat – Un Survivant de la Shoah balance tout ! (reportage en v.o.a.)

Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil

Auschwitz—The Surprising Hidden Truth

Ernst Zundel-The Great Holocaust Trial in Canada

Honest Media Today ( ; Understanding Anti-Semitism, Jewish Ritual Murder, The Holocaust Unveiled: The Persecution of the Revisionnists, Zionist War Crimes, etc.)

Léon DegrelleEntretien avec Degrelle

Vincent Reynouard (chaîne youtube)Autre chaîne – (télécharger)

David IrvingDavid Irving, l’origine de l’insurrection hongroise de 1956

Robert Faurisson

Germar Rudolf (2e copie)

Fritz Berg

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Worst Case of Ethnic Cleansing in Western History

via revisionistreview.blogspot.com

Monday, June 18, 2012

Worst case of ethnic cleansing in western history

The Hoffman Wire
June 18, 2012

The European Atrocity You Never Heard About


In the largest episode of forced migration in history, millions of German-speaking civilians were sent to Germany from Czechoslovakia (above) and other European countries after World War II by order of the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union.

By R.M. Douglas

THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION • June 11, 2012

http://chronicle.com/article/The-European-Atrocity-You/132123/

The screams that rang throughout the darkened cattle car crammed with deportees, as it jolted across the icy Polish countryside five nights before Christmas, were Dr. Loch’s only means of locating his patient. The doctor, formerly chief medical officer of a large urban hospital, now found himself clambering over piles of baggage, fellow passengers, and buckets used as toilets, only to find his path blocked by an old woman who ignored his request to move aside. On closer examination, he discovered that she had frozen to death.
Finally he located the source of the screams, a pregnant woman who had gone into premature labor and was hemorrhaging profusely. When he attempted to move her from where she lay into a more comfortable position, he found that « she was frozen to the floor with her own blood. » Other than temporarily stanching the bleeding, Loch was unable to do anything to help her, and he never learned whether she had lived or died. When the train made its first stop, after more than four days in transit, 16 frost-covered corpses were pulled from the wagons before the remaining deportees were put back on board to continue their journey. A further 42 passengers would later succumb to the effects of their ordeal, among them Loch’s wife.




An estimated 500,000 people died in the course of the organized expulsions; survivors were left in Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves.

During the Second World War, tragic scenes like those were commonplace, as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin moved around entire populations like pieces on a chessboard, seeking to reshape the demographic profile of Europe according to their own preferences. What was different about the deportation of Loch and his fellow passengers, however, was that it took place by order of the United States and Britain as well as the Soviet Union, nearly two years after the declaration of peace.

Between 1945 and 1950, Europe witnessed the largest episode of forced migration, and perhaps the single greatest movement of population, in human history. Between 12 million and 14 million German-speaking civilians—the overwhelming majority of whom were women, old people, and children under 16—were forcibly ejected from their places of birth in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, and what are today the western districts of Poland. As The New York Times noted in December 1945, the number of people the Allies proposed to transfer in just a few months was about the same as the total number of all the immigrants admitted to the United States since the beginning of the 20th century. They were deposited among the ruins of Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves as best they could. The number who died as a result of starvation, disease, beatings, or outright execution is unknown, but conservative estimates suggest that at least 500,000 people lost their lives in the course of the operation.
Most disturbingly of all, tens of thousands perished as a result of ill treatment while being used as slave labor (or, in the Allies’ cynical formulation, « reparations in kind ») in a vast network of camps extending across central and southeastern Europe—many of which, like Auschwitz I and Theresienstadt, were former German concentration camps kept in operation for years after the war. As Sir John Colville, formerly Winston Churchill’s private secretary, told his colleagues in the British Foreign Office in 1946, it was clear that « concentration camps and all they stand for did not come to an end with the defeat of Germany. » Ironically, no more than 100 or so miles away from the camps being put to this new use, the surviving Nazi leaders were being tried by the Allies in the courtroom at Nuremberg on a bill of indictment that listed « deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population » under the heading of « crimes against humanity. »
By any measure, the postwar expulsions were a manmade disaster and one of the most significant examples of the mass violation of human rights in recent history. Yet although they occurred within living memory, in time of peace, and in the middle of the world’s most densely populated continent, they remain all but unknown outside Germany itself. On the rare occasions that they rate more than a footnote in European-history textbooks, they are commonly depicted as justified retribution for Nazi Germany’s wartime atrocities or a painful but necessary expedient to ensure the future peace of Europe. As the historian Richard J. Evans asserted in In Hitler’s Shadow (1989) the decision to purge the continent of its German-speaking minorities remains « defensible » in light of the Holocaust and has shown itself to be a successful experiment in « defusing ethnic antagonisms through the mass transfer of populations. »
Even at the time, not everyone agreed. George Orwell, an outspoken opponent of the expulsions, pointed out in his essay « Politics and the English Language » that the expression « transfer of population » was one of a number of euphemisms whose purpose was « largely the defense of the indefensible. » The philosopher Bertrand Russell acidly inquired: « Are mass deportations crimes when committed by our enemies during war and justifiable measures of social adjustment when carried out by our allies in time of peace? » A still more uncomfortable observation was made by the left-wing publisher Victor Gollancz, who reasoned that « if every German was indeed responsible for what happened at Belsen, then we, as members of a democratic country and not a fascist one with no free press or parliament, were responsible individually as well as collectively » for what was being done to noncombatants in the Allies’ name.
That the expulsions would inevitably cause death and hardship on a very large scale had been fully recognized by those who set them in motion. To a considerable extent, they were counting on it. For the expelling countries—especially Czechoslovakia and Poland—the use of terror against their German-speaking populations was intended not simply as revenge for their wartime victimization, but also as a means of triggering a mass stampede across the borders and finally achieving their governments’ prewar ambition to create ethnically homogeneous nation-states. (Before 1939, less than two-thirds of Poland’s population, and only a slightly larger proportion of Czechoslovakia’s, consisted of gentile Poles, Czechs, or Slovaks.)
For the Soviets, who had « compensated » Poland for its territorial losses to the Soviet Union in 1939 by moving its western border more than 100 miles inside German territory, the clearance of the newly « Polish » western lands and the dumping of their millions of displaced inhabitants amid the ruins of the former Reich served Stalin’s twin goals of impeding Germany’s postwar recovery and eliminating any possibility of a future Polish-German rapprochement. The British viewed the widespread suffering that would inevitably attend the expulsions as a salutary form of re-education of the German population. « Everything that brings home to the Germans the completeness and irrevocability of their defeat, » Deputy Prime Minister Clement Richard Attlee wrote in 1943, « is worthwhile in the end. » And the Americans, as Laurence Steinhardt, ambassador to Prague, recorded, hoped that by displaying an « understanding » and cooperative attitude toward the expelling countries’ desire to be rid of their German populations, the United States could demonstrate its sympathy for those countries’ national aspirations and prevent them from drifting into the Communist orbit.
The Allies, then, knowingly embarked on a course that, as the British government was warned in 1944 by its own panel of experts, was « bound to cause immense suffering and dislocation. » That the expulsions did not lead to the worst consequences that could be expected from the chaotic cattle drive of millions of impoverished, embittered, and rootless deportees into a war-devastated country that had nowhere to put them was due to three main factors.
The first was the skill with which the postwar German chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, drew the expellees into mainstream politics, defusing the threat of a potentially radical and disruptive bloc. The second was the readiness of most expellees—the occasionally crass or undiplomatic statements of their leaders notwithstanding—to renounce the use or threat of force as a means of redressing their grievances. The third, and by far the most important, was the 30-year-long « economic miracle » that made possible the housing, feeding, and employment of the largest homeless population with which any industrial country has ever had to contend. (In East Germany, on the other hand, the fact that the standard of living for the indigenous population was already so low meant that the economic gap between it and the four million arriving expellees was more easily bridged.)
The downside of « economic miracles, » though, is that, as their name suggests, they can’t be relied upon to come along where and when they are most needed. By extraordinary good fortune, the Allies avoided reaping the harvest of their own recklessness. Nonetheless, the expulsions have cast a long and baleful shadow over central and southeastern Europe, even to the present day. Their disruptive demographic, economic, and even—as Eagle Glassheim has pointed out—environmental consequences continue to be felt more than 60 years later. The overnight transformation of some of the most heterogeneous regions of the European continent into virtual ethnic monoliths changed the trajectory of domestic politics in the expelling countries in significant and unpredicted ways. Culturally, the effort to eradicate every trace of hundreds of years of German presence and to write it out of national and local histories produced among the new Polish and Czech settler communities in the cleared areas what Gregor Thum has described as a state of « amputated memory. » As Thum shows in his groundbreaking study of postwar Wroclaw—until 1945 and the removal of its entire population, the German city of Breslau—the challenge of confronting their hometown’s difficult past is one that post-Communist Wroclawites have only recently taken up. In most other parts of Central Europe, it has hardly even begun.
Still less so in the English-speaking world. It is important to note that the expulsions are in no way to be compared to the genocidal Nazi campaign that preceded them. But neither can the supreme atrocity of our time become a yardstick by which gross abuses of human rights are allowed to go unrecognized for what they are. Contradicting Allied rhetoric that asserted that World War II had been fought above all to uphold the dignity and worth of all people, the Germans included, thousands of Western officials, servicemen, and technocrats took a full part in carrying out a program that, when perpetrated by their wartime enemies, they did not hesitate to denounce as contrary to all principles of humanity.
The degree of cognitive dissonance to which this led was exemplified by the career of Colonel John Fye, chief U.S. liaison officer for expulsion affairs to the Czechoslovak government. The operation he had helped carry out, he acknowledged, drew in « innocent people who had never raised so much as a word of protest against the Czechoslovak people. » To accomplish it, women and children had been thrown into detention facilities, « many of which were little better than the ex-German concentration camps. » Yet these stirrings of unease did not prevent Fye from accepting a decoration from the Prague government for what the official citation candidly described as his valuable services « in expelling Germans from Czechoslovakia. »
Today we have come not much further than Fye did in acknowledging the pivotal role played by the Allies in conceiving and executing an operation that exceeded in both scale and lethality the violent breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. It is unnecessary to attribute this to any « taboo » or « conspiracy of silence. » Rather, what is denied is not the fact of the expulsions themselves, but their significance.
Many European commentators have maintained that to draw attention to them runs the risk of diminishing the horror that ought properly to be reserved for the Holocaust and other Nazi atrocities, or giving rise to a self-pitying « victim » mentality among today’s generation of Germans, for whom the war is an increasingly distant memory. Czechs, Poles, and citizens of other expelling states fear the legal ramifications of a re-examination of the means by which millions of erstwhile citizens of those countries were deprived of their nationality, liberty, and property. To this day, the postwar decrees expropriating and denationalizing Germans remain on the statute book of the Czech Republic, and their legality has recently been reaffirmed by the Czech constitutional court.
Some notable exceptions aside, like T. David Curp, Matthew Frank, and David Gerlach, English-speaking historians—out of either understandable sympathy for Germany’s victims or reluctance to complicate the narrative of what is still justifiably considered a « good war »—have also not been overeager to delve into the history of a messy, complex, morally ambiguous, and politically sensitive episode, in which few if any of those involved appear in a creditable light.
By no means are all of these concerns unworthy ones. But neither are they valid reasons for failing to engage seriously with an episode of such obvious importance, and to integrate it within the broader narrative of modern European history. For historians to write—and, still worse, to teach—as though the expulsions had never taken place or, having occurred, are of no particular significance to the societies affected by them, is both intellectually and pedagogically unsustainable.
The fact that population transfers are currently making a comeback on the scholarly and policy agenda also suggests that we should scrutinize with particular care the most extensive experiment made with them to date. Despite the gruesome history, enthusiasts continue to chase the mirage of « humane » mass deportations as a means of resolving intractable ethnic problems. Andrew Bell-Fialkoff, in a much-cited study, has advocated population transfers as a valuable tool so long as they are « conducted in a humane, well-organized manner, like the transfer of Germans from Czechoslovakia by the Allies in 1945-47. » John Mearsheimer, Chaim Kaufmann, Michael Mann and others have done likewise.
Few wars today, whether within or between states, do not feature an attempt by one or both sides to create facts on the ground by forcibly displacing minority populations perceived as alien to the national community. And although the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court has attempted to restrain this tendency by prohibiting mass deportations, Elazar Barkan maintains that such proscriptions are far from absolute, and that « today there is no single code of international law that explicitly outlaws population transfers either in terms of group or individual rights protections. »
The expulsion of the ethnic Germans is thus of contemporary as well as historical relevance. At present, though, the study of many vital elements of this topic is still in its earliest stages. Innumerable questions—about the archipelago of camps and detention centers, the precise number and location of which are still undetermined; the sexual victimization of female expellees, which was on a scale to rival the mass rapes perpetrated by Red Army soldiers in occupied Germany; the full part played by the Soviet and U.S. governments in planning and executing the expulsions—remain to be fully answered. At a moment when the surviving expellees are passing away and many, though far from all, of the relevant archives have been opened, the time has come for this painful but pivotal chapter in Europe’s recent history to receive at last the scholarly attention it deserves.
R.M. Douglas is an associate professor of history at Colgate University. 
This essay is adapted from his new book, published by Yale University Press, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans After the Second World War.

Editorial Reviews for Orderly and Humane

Review

Orderly and Humane is an outstanding and well-written work that fills a significant gap in books written in English about this large subject and the very period of its compass. It ought to be in every serious American library and should be required reading for scholars interested in the history of the end of the Second World War and the years thereafter in Europe.”—John Lukacs, author of The Future of  History and Five Days in London, May 1940

(John Lukacs )

“R.M. Douglas has written a fair-minded, deeply researched and courageous book that carefully demystifies the claims and accusations surrounding the awful history of the expulsion of the ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe. A first-rate work, Orderly and Humane compels us to admit that the postwar expulsions were not simply a regrettable accident but a deliberate policy of ethnic cleansing on a breathtaking scale that decisively shaped postwar Europe’s history.”—William I. Hitchcock, author of The Bitter Road to Freedom: The Human Consequences of Allied Victory in World War II Europe

(William I. Hitchcock )

“The tragedy of the post-World War II ethnic German refugees and expellees has been told before but no account is based on so many original documents from so many countries as Douglas’s eminently readable work.”—Istvan Deak, Columbia University (Istvan Deak )

__________________________
Keep On the Contrary Online: send a donation to keep us publishing
Every week as a public service On the Contrary alerts you to research leads, rare facts, new revisionist books and Michael Hoffman’s scintillating columns. These efforts require funding. Give something back in return for that which you have received: send a donation today and tell a friend about our work. Thank you!
***

 

 

PLUS DE DÉTAILS:

App Austin Joseph (ang.)

Bacque, James (ang.)

Bacque, James (fr.)

De Zayas Alfred-Maurice (ang.)

MacDonogh, Giles (ang.)

Sack, John (ang.)

INTERNATIONAL JEWRY WON WW2 THEIR PURIM

Les dossiers secrets du nazisme – VENGEANCE (Empoisonner les Allemands)

 

Sur ce blog:

LES VENGEURS

Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale

Parodie de procès et torture à Nuremberg

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Alex Jones et ses disciples ne peuvent-ils voir la contradiction flagrante?

Selon Infowars, LES NAZIS, National-Socialistes — nationalistes dits « extrêmes » — seraient les vrais marionnettistes de la réunion de Bilderberg… cette même réunion de Bilderberg qui, comme le confirme Wikileaks, croit que « le nationalisme est dangereux« !

http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-bilderberg-documents-nationalism-is-dangerous.html

Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”
Infowars exclusively obtains Senators’ notes from 1966 confab
By Paul Joseph Watson
Editor’s Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.

 

 

 <iframe width= »560″ height= »315″ src= »http://www.youtube.com/embed/YB7ZaK7Oa88″ frameborder= »0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

VIDEO – Alex Jones : « Bilderberg is a nazi plan »

 

Germany’s unforgivable crime
In a letter to Lord Robert Boothby, Winston Churchill explains the Nazi’s real crime« Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit. »

 

CLICK TO ENLARGE

 

 

« What thrust us into war were not Hitler’s political teachings: the cause, this time, was his successful attempt to establish a new economy. The causes of the war were: envy, greed, and fear. »
- Major-General John Frederick Charles Fuller (1948)

PATRIOTARD LIES ABOUT HITLER

(…)First of all, Adolf Hitler was a patriotic German nationalist who endeavored to create a Germany for Germans alone; quite the opposite of a “globalist NWO” type. Secondly, Hitler and his National Socialist movement were staunchly anti-Marxist/Communist/Bolshevik and therefore anti-Internationalist and anti-Globalist. The sinister agenda of Communism, not National Socialism, was internationalism — the overthrow and vanquishment of all existing nation states in order to establish a despotic global communist super-state. The pathological criminal madness known as Communism was, from its inception, an international Jewish conspiracy for the destruction and subjugation of the Gentile world whereupon a tyrannical global Jewish imperium would be established. Communism was nothing more than an expression and manifestation of the hateful, supremacist doctrines of the Jewish Talmud, which states: “Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.” (Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10) Alex is deceptively projecting the evil and destructive legacy of Jewish Bolshevism onto Hitler and Nazi Germany.

Simple logic and common sense sufficiently undermines Alex Jones’ idiotic rhetoric about Hitler and Nazism. If Hitler and the Nazis were really part of the “New World Order” then why did the entire capitalist and communist world (the USA, Britain, France, USSR, etc) gang up to completely annihilate and destroy Nazi Germany in the Second World War? If Hitler was part of this New World Order system then why was World War Two even necessary? If Adolf Hitler and National Socialism are such a benefit to the “globalists and elites” then why have they been subjected to such ruthless, non-stop vilification and demonization in the news and entertainment media of the West for the last 67 years since the end of World War II? Meanwhile the horrific, bloody transgressions of communism have been routinely white-washed, soft-peddled and covered up by the Western press and academia. If Hitler and National Socialism are so desirable for the elites ruling over us today, then why is Mein Kampf a banned book in Germany, Austria, Russia and many other European countries? Why is the Hitlerian Swastika a banned symbol in dozens of European nations? Why is Holocaust skepticism/revisionism a crime punishable by hefty fines and even imprisonment in over a dozen countries in Europe if the “globalists” support Nazism or if some Nazi remnant has any kind of influence today? Of course, none of this makes a lick of sense if Alex Jones were right about Hitler and National Socialism. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this idiocy is that Alex Jones is telling colossal lies about Hitler and Nazi Germany for the benefit of Jewry!

The reason Hitler and Nazi Germany were targeted for complete extinction by the Allies in 1939 is precisely because they weren’t complicit with the “New World Order” but valiant and courageous opponents of it. The reason Hitler and Nazi Germany are so viciously vilified by court historians and so brutally bad-mouthed by the mass media is precisely because they were fighting against the system of control commonly referred to as the “New World Order.” Hitler and Nazi Germany were so maniacally opposed by the nations that truly do comprise the New World Order because the New World Order is a Jew World Order and Hitler freed Germany from the death-grip of the Jews. Hitler was doing one thing which resulted in a massive lying hate-propaganda effort launched against him from Hollywood. That one thing was his campaign to break the stranglehold of the Jews on Germany. Hitler removed Jews from all positions of influence in German banking/finance, media/entertainment, politics/government, the legal profession, medicine, education, and so on, which they had monopolized up until that point. And he did all of this peacefully and non-violently. He didn’t round up Jews and shoot them, he simply made it illegal for Jews to own German newspapers or radio stations, he made it illegal for them to practice law or teach in schools or universities, etc. So the Jews began leaving Germany.

On top of freeing Germany from all Jewish influence, Hitler nearly eradicated unemployment in the country. Under National Socialist economic policies, unemployment went from 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% in 1938. (Folsom, Burton W. “New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America”. New York: Threshold Editions, 2008. p. 243) Hitler instituted ingenious economic reforms whereby he established his own State-controlled central bank and currency that was not backed by Jewish-controlled precious metals or foreign exchanges, but German productive labor. As a result of National Socialist economic policies, Germany’s economy flourished. Hitler freed Germany from the debt slavery imposed on free peoples by the usurious Jewish banking dynasties of Europe, led by the Rothschilds. Adolf Hitler saved and liberated Germany and its people! This is why, when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, International Jewry unleashed a perfidious economic war on the Third Reich in a concerted effort to bring down Hitler and his glorious National Socialist government who dared to free themselves from Jewish domination.

These are facts that Alex Jones is not going to tell you because Alex Jones is working for the very people that Adolf Hitler, and countless men before him, frantically warned us to be wary of.

At the 26:35 mark of the video Alex Jones claims:

“It was the eugenicist population reductionist Adolf Hitler who said “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it.” »

Let’s expose Alex’s first frivolous big lie. Hitler was not a “eugenicist population reductionist.” On the contrary, Hitler’s Party — the NSDAP — strongly encouraged the women of the Third Reich to be homemakers so that they could raise large families. The NSDAP gave financial incentives to couples and newlyweds so that they would have more children:

“On 5th July 1933 the Law for the Encouragement of Marriage was passed. This act gave all newly wed couples a loan of 1000 marks which was reduced by 25% for each child they had. If the couple went on to have four children the loan was wiped out. …

On the birthdate of Hitler’s mother, August 12th, awards of the Motherhood Cross were given to women who had produced the most children. A gold cross was awarded to mothers of 8 or more children, silver to mothers of 6 children and bronze to mothers of four children.” (Nazi Germany — Role of Women)

(…)

If anyone should be labeled a “eugenicist population reductionist” it would be the Jew Theodore Kaufman. Yet, unsurprisingly, Kaufman and his genocidal book didn’t make it into Alex’s so-called “documentary.”

Alex’s second hideous big lie is his assertion that Hitler said, “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it.” This is a variation of “If you tell a lie often enough, eventually people will come to believe it.” When and where did Hitler say this? Alex doesn’t say, and fails to provide a source for this quote. And do you know why? Because Hitler never said it. It is just one of countless fabricated quotes attributed to the Nazis by deceitful Jews. If Alex Jones had actually read Mein Kampf, he would have known that Hitler identified and condemned the “big lie” technique, in actuality stating that his enemies, the Jews and the Marxists, were the progenitors and masters of this strategy:

“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. [...] All this was inspired by the principle — which is quite true in itself — that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” (A. Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 185)

Hitler, in Mein Kampf, said that the Jews have an “unqualified capacity for falsehood.” Hitler said that the Jew, through the medium of his newspapers, is “always spreading falsehood” and if he tells the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some greater deceit. Hitler proclaimed the Jews to be the “Great Master of Lies.” Hitler said that falsehood and duplicity are the weapons with which the Jews wage war against non-Jews. (Mein Kampf, p. 275)

The fearless spirit of truth martyr Joseph Goebbels will live on!

Sometimes this fraudulent quote — “The bigger the lie the more people will believe it” — is attributed to the Third Reich’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels. The fact of the matter is that neither Goebbels nor Hitler made that statement. Goebbels, in fact, said the opposite, stressing that the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth:

“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” (Goebbels at Nuremberg Rally, 1934)

Just before his death in 1945, the virtuous truth-teller Joseph Goebbels said:

“There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.” (Heiber, Helmut. Goebbels. New York: Hawthorn, 1972. Print. p. 350.)

Moreover, the handbook outlining National Socialist propaganda methods unequivocally states that the foundation and supreme principal of National Socialist propaganda is the truth:

…we are not propagandizing lies and untruths as England did during the War, but rather we are preaching freedom and prosperity, socialism and patriotism to our confused people. Our struggle and our propaganda have one supreme principle: to take truth and only truth as the foundation of our propaganda.” (Handbook of the NS Propagandist, Munich: Reichs-Parteileitung der N.S.D.A.P., 1927, p.5)

Once again, Alex Jones, being a skilled liar and peddler of ridiculous falsehoods, manages to project the treacherous tactics of the Jews onto the enemies of Jews. In actuality, it was the crypto-Jewish communist leader Vladimir Lenin — the butcher of millions! — who openly advocated every imaginable evil, encouraging lies and deceit, terrorism and the wholesale slaughter of entire populations!

Lenin is the one who said:

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

Lenin went even further, unashamedly stating:

“We must utilise all possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth.” (“The Present Stage of Soviet Global Expansion,” U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies, p.29)

Terrorism, in the mind of Lenin, was a good and justified action, stating:

“… real, nation-wide terror, which reinvigorates the country.”

Lenin openly declared his genocidal bloodlust, casually talking about killing off nearly the entire Russian population to ensure the victory of communism:

“What does it matter if 90 percent of the Russian people perish, provided the surviving 10 percent bring about a World Revolution?” (Time Magazine – February 11, 1924)

Another Jewish Bolshevik leader, Grigory Zinoviev, “wrote off” 10,000,000 Slavs for slaughter, stating:

“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated.” (A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Great Britain: Foreign Office, (1919), p. 99)

I wonder why none of these atrocious Jewish quotes ended up in Jones’s documentary? I wonder why Jones never ever quotes the filth that can be found in the Talmud, Tanakh or Zohar (See: Judaism’s Strange Gods by Michael Hoffman II). I wonder why Jones never quotes the statements of Gentile-hating Jewish rabbis — like Ovadia Yosef and Manis Friedman — who have called for the annihilation and enslavement of non-Jews?

At the 13:12 mark of the documentary we see this graphic:

Oh, what a surprise! Alex Jones is a “true believer” in the epic fairy tale and quasi-religious cult known as the Holocaust™. He states as fact that the Nazis are responsible for 20,946,000 deaths between 1933-1945. Even mainline historians wouldn’t agree with that figure. It’s a steaming pile of “disinfowars” rubbish.

Do these people look “oppressed” to you?

In the years preceding WWII (1933-1939) the Nazis were not rounding people up by the thousands and shooting them the way the Jewish communists were in Russia, Ukraine, Hungary and elsewhere. Hitler wasn’t shooting anybody, including Jews. His SS troops were not raping or terrorizing anyone either. Video footage of everyday life inside Nazi Germany unveils a totally different picture to the one painted by official historiography disseminated in the schools. In it we see happy, jovial Germans — men, women, teenagers and children enjoying life, engaging in social activities, playing games, drinking beer, dancing and celebrating. You won’t be able to find film footage like that in the despotic Jew-run hell hole known as the Soviet Union — a genuine horror house of human misery. Nazi Germany hosted the summer Olympic Games in 1936 for Christ’s sake! Hitler’s Germany was a bastion of freedom, a magnificent society with a myriad of social advantages. The Nazis truly were ahead of their time.

Only after war was declared on Germany by Britain and France in 1939 did the Nazis step up their internal security efforts to enforce law and order. Only then did the Nazis begin interning perceived security threats and saboteurs, such as Jews, communists and other disloyal citizens, in concentration camps (which all the major powers involved in WW2 had). Only after the war against Germany commenced did the Nazis begin rounding up Jews and putting them in ghettos and labor camps. Only after war was declared on Germany by Britain and France — at the behest of International Jewry — did the Nazis become more harsh in their treatment of Jews, whose demonic kinsmen in Paris, Washington and London had instigated this bloody conflict to begin with, and who had been waging a relentless economic and propaganda war against Nazi Germany at the outset of Hitler’s assumption of power in 1933. After six years of intense Jewish agitation and aggression against Nazi Germany the Jews successfully drove two Western powers, as well as their colonies, into war against Germany, with the USA soon to follow. Joseph Goebbels, in a brilliant article he authored in 1943 entitled “The War and The Jews,” stated:

“Jewry wanted this war. Whether one looks to the plutocratic or the bolshevist side of the enemy camp, one sees Jews standing in the foreground as instigators, rabble-rousers and slave drivers. They organize the enemy’s war economy and encourage plans to exterminate and destroy the Axis powers. England and the USA recruit from among them bloodthirsty and vengeful agitators and political lunatics, and they are the source of the terror commissars of the GPU. They are the mortar that holds the enemy coalition together. In the National Socialist Reich, they see a power that resists their drive for world domination both militarily and intellectually. That explains their rage and deep hatred. Do not think that the Old Testament tirades of their newspapers and radio are merely political propaganda. They would carry it all out to the letter, should they have the opportunity.”

A testament to the truth behind Goebbels’ every word was a letter sent to the British PM Neville Chamberlain in 1939 by a leading Zionist figure named Chaim Weizmann — who would become Israel’s first president — in which he stated:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies.” (The Times, “Jews To Fight For Democracies,” September 6, 1939)

Hitler, like Goebbels, understood the reality of Jewish warmongering against the Reich and decided that the only solution to the Jewish problem in Europe was separation through forced deportation. Thus the Nazis drafted a four-year plan to deport four million European Jews to the island of Madagascar. Once settled there, the Jews would rule themselves but be kept under German surveillence as a means to keep their mischievous brethren in the United States in line. An article publshed in the St. Petersburg Times on August 8, 1940, quotes an SS spokesman as stating that if the Axis Powers were victorious in the war, all Jews will be forced to leave Europe afterwards:

“A German peace will mean a Jew-less peace, Das Schwarze Korps, mouth piece of Adolf Hitler’s elite SS guard, proclaimed yesterday.

Once the war is won, some area remote from Europe will be set apart for Jewish colonization, the paper said, and then the continent will be cleared entirely of Jews. …

Das Schwarze Korps’ discussion of a “peace without Jews” declared Jews had co-operated with Britain in an attempt to “convert all Europe into a chaotic, blood-soaked battlefield.” Therefore they must pay the bill, the paper said.

The German-Italian victory the paper explained, “will secure space far away from European labor and culture where the scum of humanity may try to lead a life of its own toil or die a death it earned.”

Now I will address the gargantuan falsehood perpetrated by Alex Jones in his documentary. He claims that the Nazis are responsible for the deaths of about 20,000,000 people between 1933 and 1945. Firstly, the Holocaust™ as we have been propagandized to believe it is a colossal fraud, a hoax of near planetary proportions. The legendary French holocaust revisionist, Robert Faurisson, succinctly summed up the Hoax in this short statement:

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”


The ridiculous fairy tale that exactly 6,000,000 Jews were killed in gas chambers and by other means by Hitler and his forces is already dead, even as far as the official story is concerned. Raul Hilberg, a Jewish supremacist who was considered to be the leading “expert” on the so-called Holocaust™ and preeminent author of exterminationist literature like “The Destruction of the European Jews,” admitted under oath in the kangaroo court of the first Zündel trial in 1985 that there is no scientific proof that Jews had been gassed and that there is not a single Nazi document to be found actually setting forth an order nor allocating a monetary budget for the extermination of Jewry (he actually had to revise an earlier edition of his book where he falsely claimed that there was a Hitler order). On the contrary, all the documents dealing with the Nazis’ solution of the Jewish question refer to emigration.

In 1990, the Auschwitz State Museum massively revised the death toll there from 4,000,000 to 1,000,000, a reduction of 3,000,000. For forty-five years following WWII, governments, historians, journalists, professors, etc, were — like parrots — repeating the fraudulent four million figure as fact, yet now they confess it was a giant lie! Would you really expect to find a swimming pool (fitted with a diving board), a soccer field, a cinema, a theater, a brothel, hospitals, a post-office, religious facilities, a sauna, an artist’s studio, kitchens, dental facilities, etc, in a perilous “death factory”? All of those things existed in the Auschwitz concentration camp complex.

Many more “official” reductions of the death figures at several of the major Nazi concentration camps have been made. For example, the lying Jews initially claimed that “2,000,000 people, mostly Jews” were “exterminated” in Mauthausen, a camp in Austria, but now claim only 14,000 Jews died there. It was originally claimed that 1,500,000 Jews were done to death in Majdanek, a camp in Poland. This figure was officially revised down to 79,000.

Included in Alex’s absurd 20,000,000 death figure most likely is the alleged “5,000,000 non-Jews” that the hoaxers claim also died at the hands of the Nazis. To debunk this assertion I will simply quote from one of the most prominent Holocaust™ hucksters out there — the ultra-Zionist Jewess Deborah Lipstadt:

“Why is Segev so forgiving of Simon Wiesenthal’s many lapses? Perhaps we can arrive at an answer by considering Wiesenthal’s most egregious distortion of the historical record and Segev’s response to it. In the 1970s, Wiesenthal began to refer to “eleven million victims” of the Holocaust, six million Jews and five million non-Jews, but the latter number had no basis in historical reality.

Wiesenthal’s contrived death toll, with its neat almost-symmetry, has become a widely accepted “fact.” Jimmy Carter’s Executive Order, which was the basis for the establishment of the US Holocaust Museum, referred to the “eleven million victims of the Holocaust.” I have been to many Yom Hashoah observances-including those sponsored by synagogues and Jewish communities-where eleven candles were lit. When I tell the organizers that they are engaged in historical revisionism, their reactions range from skepticism to outrage. Strangers have taken me to task in angry letters for focusing “only” on Jewish deaths and ignoring the five million others. When I explain that this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up, they become even more convinced of my ethnocentrism and inability to feel the pain of anyone but my own people.

When Israeli historians Yehuda Bauer and Yisrael Gutman challenged Wiesenthal on this point, he admitted that he had invented the figure of eleven million victims in order to stimulate interest in the Holocaust among non-Jews. He chose five million because it was almost, but not quite, as large as six million. When Elie Wiesel asked Wiesenthal who these supposed five million victims were, Wiesenthal exploded and accused him of suffering from “Judeocentrism.”” (Lipstadt, Deborah E. Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History. Jewish Review of Books)

So there you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. It turns out that the alleged “5,000,000 non-Jewish” victims of the Nazis were conjured out of thin air by the pathological liar, Simon “Nazi hunter” Wiesenthal, as a marketing ploy to stimulate non-Jewish interest in his bizarre gas chamber cult. A pure fiction!

When you tally all of those official reductions of HoloHoax deaths together — including the five million non-existent Gentile victims made up by Wiesenthal — you get 11,326,000 invented, conjured, mythical, fictional victims of the Nazis! Through decades of tedious research and intense study, Holocaust Revisionist scholars have determined that somewhere between 300,000 and 500,000 people — both Jews and Gentiles — perished in the Nazis’ labor and prison camps, largely due to malnutrition and disease that was a result, not of a Nazi extermination policy, but almost entirely due to the barbaric Allied saturation bombing of Germany and its supply lines which prevented key shipments of foodstuffs, medicines and other life-sustaining materials from making it to the camps.

Despite these monstrously over-inflated death figures being exposed as a farce decades ago, the magical “six million” figure bizarrely remains unchanged. That is because the six million figure has religious significance to Jews. Its origin is rooted in an ancient Torah prophecy that states 6,000,000 Jews first will perish in a fiery holocaust as a sacrifice to the tribal Jewish god Yahweh, before the Jews can make their gallant return to the “promised land” (Israel). (See: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism by Ben Weintraub and History & Scriptural Origins of the Six Million Number by John Bryant)

Indeed, the kabbalistic fable of “6,000,000 dead or dying Jews” has been the staple of Zionist propaganda campaigns dating back to the late 19th century. (See: The First Holocaust by Don Heddesheimer and The “Six Million” Myth) There are, in total, a staggering 147 references to “six million Jews” in the context of either being severely persecuted or in danger of being annihilated from 1900 through 1945. This clever propaganda was designed and disseminated by Zionist Jews — beginning shortly after the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897 — to elicit sympathy and support for the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine on the ashes of the indigenous Arabs, which was accomplished on the back of this disgusting Jewish Hoax™ in 1948. That’s why, in 1900, arch-Zionist Rabbi Stephen S. Wise proclaimed:

“There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” (“Rabbi Wise’s Address,” New York Times, 1900)

In addition to the astronomical fraudulence of the holocaust™ story, the Nazis have also been scapegoated for the bloodcurdling atrocities that the Soviet communists committed against their own people and the people of Eastern Europe during WWII. Of course, during WWII the Germans — surrounded by bloodthirsty enemies incited by the Talmudic hate of the Jewish commissars in the Kremlin and the Jewish propagandists in Hollywood — were fighting a war of racial survival. They killed their foes just as any soldier is trained to do in a war, and who could fault them for doing so? It was a chaotic bloodbath of obscene proportions. Millions upon millions of people were killed, on all sides. However, the Western media has, since the end of WWII, parroted the claim that 20,000,000 Russians were killed by the Axis Forces during the war. This turns out to be yet another mountainous sham.

In a groundbreaking book entitled “Stalin’s Secret War,” Russian historian Nikolai Tolstoy demonstrates that a majority of the Soviet citizens killed during the war were not the victims of Nazi forces but were, in fact, the victims of Stalin and his NKVD henchmen in his merciless campaign of ferocious violence and mass murder against his own population to keep them subdued and subservient to communist rule. Charles Lutton’s review of Stalin’s Secret War describes this dark reality as such:

“The “secret war” Tolstoy goes on to vividly describe was the fierce campaign Stalin waged against the Russian population – a struggle which often took priority over pressing military problems. For example, Stalin tied up much of the rail network in western Russia with slave trains of captives from the Baltic states, instead of devoting all rolling stock to the reinforcement of the frontlines. At L’Vov, where the Soviet 4th Army was fighting desperately to prevent its surrender, Stalin’s major concern was that the NKVD finish liquidating potential Ukrainian opponents of the regime rather than order the local security forces to join in the battle against advancing Axis units. While Stalin pleaded with the British to rush more aid and take further action, the NKVD labor camp guards were doubled in number from 500,000 to one million heavily armed men.

Standard treatments of this period always claim that the Soviet Union lost over 20 million people during the Second World War. Tolstoy makes a convincing case that the actual total is probably closer to 30 million, maybe even more — with about a third of these deaths attributable to Axis actions. The blame for as many as 23 million deaths is placed with Stalin and his NKVD henchmen.

Casualty figures for the Eastern Front have been estimated as follows: two and a half million German soldiers died in the East. It is believed that three Red Army men died for every German soldier killed. Of those 7,500,000 military deaths, approximately three million Russians died as POWs.

Tolstoy’s analysis of these statistics does much to revise our understanding of the war on the Eastern Front, as he demonstrates that these high Russian military casualties were largely due to the Soviets’ crude methods of waging war. “Penal battalions” composed of “enemies of the people” (i.e., inmates of prisons and camps, and luckless peasants, including women and children) were hurled in waves against German defensive positions. Frequently unarmed and at times deprived of camouflaged uniforms to better draw enemy fire, they were often used to clear minefields. With NKVD machine-gunners poised behind them, they were forced across minefields until a path was cleared. The wounded were killed off by the NKVD. General Ratov, chief of the Soviet Military Mission to Britain, actually declined an offer of British mine-detectors, remarking that “in the Soviet Union we use people.” SMERSH (from the initials “Death to Spies”), the NKVD’s special murder arm made famous by Ian Fleming in his James Bond thrillers, was created in 1942 as an additional guard on Soviet front-line troops. The NKVD placed large heavily-armed formations at the rear of Soviet units to discourage withdrawals and to pick off “stragglers” and “cowards.” In a number of instances, NKVD units fought pitched battles with Red Army detachments trying to retreat in the face of superior enemy forces. Stalin continued to purge his armed forces even as the Axis advanced. It is likely that hundreds of thousands of Russians were killed in such actions.

As for the POWs who died in German captivity, Tolstoy reminds the reader that the Soviet government refused to sign the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War, refused to cooperate with the International Red Cross (the Nazis allowed the Red Cross to visit concentration camps), and rebuffed German feelers forwarded through neutralist concerning compliance with the Hague Convention. A 1941 directive ordered Red Army men to commit suicide instead of surrender and Soviet law regarded Russian POWs as traitors. Besides their own “penal battalions,” the Russians occasionally used POWs to clear minefields.

German attitudes toward the Russians were further colored by evidence of NKVD massacres encountered at such places as L’Vov, Vinnitsa, and Katyn. They found not just piles of corpses, but apparently mass-produced torture instruments, including devices for squeezing the skull, another for the testicles, and tools used to skin prisoners alive. Ice picks, broken bottles, or whatever else was handy or preferred were also used. Tolstoy observes that “Soviet cruelty far outstripped that of National Socialism. . . . Torture in the USSR was (and is) employed on a mass scale as an important punitive means of overawing a resentful population.” He goes on to explain that these ghastly scenes of state-sanctioned depravity “confirmed the German view that Bolshevik Russia was irredeemably savage and backward.” Considering how civilians and POWs were treated by the Communists, the Germans felt no obligation to show much consideration for Russian POWs. According to the author, there was a purpose behind all of this cruelty:

Stalin went out of his way to invite Nazi ill-treatment and later extermination of Russian prisoners-of-war. . . . It is quite clear, therefore, that the deaths of over three million Russians in German custody was a piece of deliberate Soviet policy, the aim of which was to cause the liquidation of men regarded automatically as political traitors, whilst directing the anger of the Soviet people against the perpetrators of the crime. . . . It should not be forgotten, either, that Soviet cruelty greatly prolonged the conflict, costing all belligerent nations millions of lives. . . . This evidence of how the Soviets treated their own people, coupled with the harsh treatment they visited on prisoners-of-war, was the major cause of Germany’s obstinate determination to fight on to the end, long after it had become clear her cause was doomed.”

Having accounted for the 7½ million military casualties, Tolstoy states that four million Russian civilians were killed by the Germans (although this includes those involved in anti-Partisan operations, military sieges of such cities as Leningrad, and 750,000 Jews). This leaves 18-20 million additional Russians killed in the course of Stalin’s “secret war” against his own subjects.” (Lutton, Charles. Book Review — Stalin’s War: Victims and Accomplices, Journal of Historial Review)

The Germans, on the other hand, could be said to have been the most humane participants in the bloodbath that was the Second World War. In Michael Walsh’s study of Allied war crimes, he informs us:

By contrast the German armed forces behaved impeccably towards their prisoners-of-war. “The most amazing thing about the atrocities in this war is that there have been so few of them. I have come up against few instances where the Germans have not treated prisoners according to the rules, and respected the Red Cross” reported respected newspaper The Progressive February, 4th 1945.

Allan Wood, London Correspondent of the London Express agreed. “The Germans even in their greatest moments of despair obeyed the Convention in most respects. True it is that there were front line atrocities – passions run high up there – but they were incidents, not practices, and misadministration of their American prison camps was very uncommon.” Lieutenant Newton L. Marguiles echoed his words.

US Assistant Judge Advocate, Jefferson Barracks, April 27th 1945. “It is true that the Reich exacted forced labour from foreign workers, but it is also true that, they were for the most part paid and fed well.”

“I think some of the persons found themselves better off than at any time in their lives before,” added Dr. James K. Pollack, Allied Military Government. “What did the Germans do to get efficient production from forced labour that we were not able to do with Germans working down the mines? They fed their help and fed them well.” Said Max H. Forester, Chief of AMG’s Coal and Mining Division in July 1946.”

Does anyone honestly believe that Alex Jones is just ill-informed or “unaware” of these irrefutable and salient facts exonerating the Germans of crimes that they never committed? Don’t be naive. Alex knows all about holocaust revisionism, and many people have called into his show to confront him on it. He is not merely a loud-mouthed ignoramus, he is deliberately withholding these truths from his followers and radio audience.

Does Alex Jones truly believe that the “New World Order” is a Nazi conspiracy and that Adolf Hitler is its progenitor? Please, don’t kid yourself. That narrative is so nonsensical, so perposterous and outrageous, that even a certified paranoid schizophrenic would scoff upon hearing it. Alex Jones doesn’t actually believe his own rhetoric about Hitler and the “Nazi NWO.” He is paid in shekel to broadcast these egregious lies for Jewry!

Besides the evidence, facts and information already illustrated herein demonstrating the illogicality and maliciously fallacious nature of Alex Jones’ anti-Hitler smears, one single article from the Jewish-owned propaganda newspaper, The New York Times, is enough to utterly demolish Alex’s bald-faced lies about a Nazi-led NWO. In an article dated October 6, 1940, titled “New World Order Pledged To Jews,” we are informed of a vocal pledge made by Arthur Greenwood, a member of the British War Cabinet during WWII:

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of “justice and peace.”

Mr. Greenwood, who is deputy leader of the British Labor Party, declared that in the new world the “conscience of civilized humanity would demand that the wrongs suffered by the Jewish people in so many countries should be righted.”

He added that after the war an opportunity would be given to Jews everywhere to make a “distinctive and constructive contribution” in the rebuilding of the world.” (“NEW WORLD ORDER PLEDGED TO JEWS.” New York Times. 06 Oct, 1940.)

In addition to the astonishing statements made by a top British official advocating the establishment of a Jewish-led New World Order immediately following WWII, I present a quote from a Jewish freemason from the B’nai B’rith Canada (a secret Jewish-Masonic society):

“Memory of the Holocaust is central to the new world order. … Achieving our quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” (Ian J. Kagedan. Toronto Star. November 26, 1991)

This brazen statement is essentially a confession that the holocaust™ fiction Westerners have been inundated and inoculated with following the end of the Second World War in 1945 will be utilized as a vehicle for Jewish power and world domination.

In an amazing display of abject candor, Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, handed us all the proof that is even necessary to demonstrate the reality of the Jewish quest for world domination. In 1962, Ben-Gurion openly declared that a world government ruled by the Jews from Jerusalem would soon be formed, and that this was predicted by the genocidal Jewish Old Testament “prophet,” Isaiah. He said:

“With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” (David Ben-Gurion and Amram Duchovny. David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words. Fleet Press Corp., 1969, p. 116; also quoted in Look Magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)

All of this incredibly incriminating material illustrating that it is International Jewry — not Hitler and the Nazis — who are the criminal masterminds behind the globalist New World Order agenda is, of course, completely overlooked and rejected by the Jewish apologist Alex Jones. Nary a mention does he make to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the modern incarnation of the ancient Jewish plan for world domination first iterated some 2,500 years ago in the Jewish Bible (Tanakh). The fundamental position of the Jewish religion has always been one of ethnic supremacy, asserting that the Jews are an “elite,” an “elect,” the “chosen people of God” who are destined to rule the earth and destined to exterminate and enslave their non-Jewish adversaries — i.e. the “inferior Goyim.”

In Isaiah 61:5-6 it states: “Aliens will shepherd your flocks; foreigners will work your fields and vineyards. And you will be called priests of the Lord, you will be named ministers of our God. You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches you will boast.”

In Isaiah 49:23 it says: “Kings will be your foster fathers, and their queens your nursing mothers. They will bow down before you with their faces to the ground; they will lick the dust at your feet.”

Isaiah 60:12 announces: “For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly ruined.”

This is what awaits us all in the hellish nightmare of a “Jewish Utopia” on earth. You have been forewarned! Now, the only question is: what are you going to do to put a stop to this madness?

Plus d’infos:

La secte de Jonestown

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste des Rothschild

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Gordon Duff décline l’invitation de la révisionniste Carolyn Yeager, sous prétexte qu’elle ne connaît pas la « connexion Bush-nazis » (connexion qui n’a jamais existé!)

Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés

L’homme qui se dit « le juif le plus riche du monde », Sheldon Adelson, donnera « tout ce qu’il faudra » pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama

 


Sheldon Adelson reportedly has said he will donate « whatever it takes » to defeat President Obama  – JTA

Après avoir financé Newt Gingrich à coups de dizaines de millions, il finance maintenant Mitt Romney, le candidat de Lady Lynn Rothschild. Tout pour empêcher une réélection d’Obama.

Sheldon Adelson gave a pro-Mitt Romney super-PAC $10 million – JTA

Adelson’s Pro-Romney Donations Will Be ‘Limitless,’ Could Top $100M

Mitt Romney met with Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino magnate who took aim at Romney’s presidential campaign by substantially backing challenger Newt Gingrich.

Romney says he will do the ‘opposite’ of Obama on Israel – JTA

La politique israélienne de Mitt Romney sera contraire aux actions d’Obama

Most Israelis think Romney would be ‘friendlier’

L’ANTISEMITE (Barack Obama)

‘Obama’s Attitude Towards Pollard Proves His Anti-Semitism’

Republicans: Israelis first to see Obama faults–Ari Fleischer says Israelis lack of support for Obama was harbinger of reduced US Jewish support for Obama.

Romney aide to Haaretz: After he’s elected, Iran will see there’s a new sheriff in town

Ron Paul Supporters Are Really Pissed That Rand Paul Endorsed Mitt Romney

America Last: Will Zionist Pressure Force Rand to Rewrite Ron’s America-First Foreign Policy?

Romney’s post-Tish’a B’Av faux pas, Sheldon Adelson’s ‘tainted money’ Romney’s embattled Israel fundraiser Even before landing in Israel as part of a foreign trip that includes Britain,…

Zionist casino mogul Sheldon Adelson rocks Israeli media

NYTIMES: What Sheldon Adelson Wants

TUT Pod-Broadcast June 18, 2012

Romney would to the ‘exact opposite’ as Obama when it comes to Israel.

Mark Dankof joins the program to discuss this and other relevant items.

Download Here

See online:

<iframe width= »420″ height= »315″ src= »http://www.youtube.com/embed/kVAj35q2Vzo » frameborder= »0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

 

The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

June 26, 2012   AFP

Sheldon Adelson: The ‘Richest Jew in the World’ Funds Efforts to Oust Obama

By Michael Collins Piper

Those who want to see Barack Obama out of the White House have a tough, no-holds-barred ally in Las Vegas-and Israel-based billionaire gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson, who some call “the modern-day Meyer Lansky,” recalling the longtime head of the national crime syndicate.

The New York Times reported on June 17 that Adelson—a key ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is himself a close, longtime friend of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney—has said he is prepared to spend $100M of his own money this year to defeat Obama and help elect Republicans.

SHELDON ADELSON & LYNN DE ROTHSCHILD
Two of the big names working to oust Obama

Adelson’s friend Fred Zeidman—a prominent figure in the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and a major player in the GOP in Texas—told the Times that Adelson is “fully committed to beating Barack Obama,” adding that the $100M Adelson is willing to spend is “a meaningless amount of money” to super-rich Adelson.

Reportedly worth some $25B, Adelson once referred to himself as “the richest Jew in the world.”

This past year, the American-born gambling chief and his Israeli wife gave $20M to a so-called superPAC supporting the presidential ambitions of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who loudly echoed Adelson’s hard-line support for Israel.

A superPAC refers to a new breed of political action committee that was spawned from an infamous 2010 Supreme Court ruling, which allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections. With federal election law loopholes in place, superPACs can avoid disclosing the names of their contributors. But unlike regular PACs, superPACs cannot donate funds directly to politicians. What they do is hire propagandists, and spend their millions buying commercials on television and placing advertisements in newspapers backing one politician over another.

Now the casino kingpin is going all out to make sure the GOP not only take theWhite House but also Congress, leading the Times to refer to Adelson’s “growing role as one of the country’s leading political financiers”—referring to Adelson’s clout here in America, rather than to his equally considerable impact in Israel.

Adelson has not only pledged an additional $10M to a superPAC supporting Mitt Romney but he has also dropped $5M into the  coffers of the Congressional Leadership Fund, a superPAC that supports GOP candidates for Congress.

And it has been reported that Adelson has given even more millions to other superPACs, some $5M going to Young Guns, a front for Rep. Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who shares Adelson’s devotion to Israel, as well as $10M to the Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies run by GOP operative Karl Rove. He has even talked of handing $10M to fellow billionaires Charles and David Koch, key figures behind the tea party movement, to assist in their pro-GOP endeavors.

If Adelson lives up to his promises, this is just the start.

Adelson joins Lady Lynn Forrester de Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a member of the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in lining up behind Romney, another of the big names who says “Obama must go.”

Recently, Leslie Gelb, the former president of the CFR, complained to writer Edward Klein, author of the new book The Amateur (highly critical of Obama) that no president had taken more personal control over foreign policy than Obama. Klein quoted Gelb as having stated:

“This is an Obama-centric decision-making operation. In other administrations, a lot of decisions were made below the presidential level. But Obama shapes most policies. He takes pen to paper and writes decision papers. Usually presidents have other things to do than sit down and write a document that takes an inordinate amount of time. But Obama makes the calls on most every subject and with a degree of personal intensity.”

Klein suggests that Obama’s policies—especially his stance toward Israel—are “a rupture with the past” betraying the bipartisan consensus forged on foreign policy issues and carried out by officials in Republican and Democratic administrations alike.

That Klein is also taking on Obama may spell a public relations danger to the president.

Klein has been a key figure in three of the most powerful Zionist media dynasties: He was editor-in chief of The New York Times Magazine, published by the Sulzberger family; former foreign editor of Newsweek, published by the Meyer-Graham family (of Washington Post fame); and is the author of the “Walter Scott” column in the weekly Parade, owned by S.I. Newhouse, who famously saved then-Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) from election defeat by cutting off “Jewish lobby” money to Helms’s opponent, after which Helms became fervently pro-Israeli.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

No More No-Win Wars
• Is Obama the reason we haven’t attacked Iran?

By Willis A. Carto
There are many things that an alert American may criticize President Barack Obama for, but these failings are not the subject of this commentary. Instead, we wish to congratulate him for his surprising statesmanship and guts for resisting the Israeli lobby in a matter of vital national interest.
No one may doubt that what Israel wants, Israel gets. It is estimated by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, the authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, that Israel has received more than $140 billion in financial and other benefits from U.S. taxpayers since 1949. And yet, in spite of this proof of Israel’s political power in this “democracy,” President Obama has so far rejected Israel’s efforts to do the one thing that Israel craves above everything else—to attack Iran.
Israel-firsters (and by the use of this term the Judeo-Christians under the sway of such racketeers as John Hagee must be included) claim Iran is an existential threat to Israel. At any moment, they fear, Iran will lob hundreds of missiles at the poor Israelis. Iran must be stopped before it’s too late.
And Israel must have the full cooperation—monetary as well as military—of the United States to forestall or avenge this fate.
But here’s the rub. Has Obama turned a deaf ear to the Israel-firsters? Could he be cognizant of the advice of this country’s Founding Father, George Washington and the other God-inspired men who created this nation, to avoid foreign wars? Could Obama actually be rejecting the internationalists, such as Mitt Romney, John McCain, Joe Lieberman and other war maniacs and acting in the best interests of America, and damn the industrialists, bankers and lunatics who want perpetual war for America?
Could Obama realize that an American attack on Iran—even if Israel could procure the consent of Congress—would be a strategic disaster for this nation no matter if endorsed by multitudes of TV talking heads and scribblers who can be counted to bark obediently every time Israel gives the signal?
Such an attack would beyond question constitute the greatest no-win war yet for our country.
Such an attack would mean bombing Tehran and other Iranian cities with nuclear warheads. This would be a major atrocity and war crime. We would kill many thousands of Persians but only an invasion by infantry wins wars, and deploying a minimum of 15 million infantrymen (not girls and fairies) along with sufficient tanks, cannon, rockets, airplanes, ammunition and materiel to do the
job would be impossible, as would be our Navy  aking control of the Persian Gulf.
An attempted invasion of Iran would be the greatest favor we could possibly do for Russia and China. U.S. embarrassment at the outcome of such an ill-conceived venture would follow, and Russia and China could be counted on to rub it in on the international stage. Goodbye, American prestige and all the billions the taxpayers have contributed for the past 50 years to make people love us. 
——
Willis A. Carto is a longtime nationalist writer and editor, who has also published hundreds of books of interest to populists. He was the founder of LIBERTY LOBBY and is currently the editor of THE BARNES REVIEW (TBR) history magazine. If you’ve never seen TBR, write P.O. Box 15877,Washington, D.C. 20003 for a free sample issue.

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

May 28, 2012   AFP

Odd Bedfellows Unite Against Obama

Conservatives, radicals, centrists, birthers, Zionists join to challenge president

By Michael Collins Piper

Barack Obama’s fight to win reelection just got tougher. One of his biggest critics, one of the world’s richest, most powerful women—Lady Lynn de Rothschild of New York and London—has not only endorsed Republican Mitt Romney, but she also pulled the plug on Americans Elect (AE), the proposed “centrist” third party of which she was one of the chief sponsors.

Although the establishment media loudly noted in recent reports that AE folded up shop after having spent at least $35M in Wall Street-financed organizing efforts, those reports did not mention that the primary reason AE collapsed was because Lady de Rothschild—the American-born wife of Sir Evelyn Rothschild of the international banking dynasty and a key figure in the global elite in her own right—had decided Romney was acceptable as the GOP’s nominee.

While AE postured as a “grass-roots” effort to break partisan gridlock in America, the truth is that Lady de Rothschild and a clique of elite figures from the Rothschild sphere of influence on Wall Street and in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—of which she is a member—had set AE in motion in the first place.

The intent of such a centrist party at the time was to defeat Obama and any potential GOP nominee, who did not meet the standards of the Rothschild family and its circles.

While Lady de Rothschild had backed former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman—a fervent internationalist—for the GOP nomination, his campaign was fading well before the first primary battle. As far back as Dec. 19—while both promoting Huntsman’s aspirations and providing pivotal support for AE’s centrist party efforts—Lady de Rothschild publicly told the popular news website the Huffington Post she would back Romney if Huntsman eventually withdrew.

Not a month later, while holding a fundraiser for Huntsman at her apartment in Manhattan, she told The Washington Post she would support Romney if he did win the GOP nomination, which, at that point, was still not assured.

On Jan. 13, the Post—owned by investors such as Warren Buffett and the Graham family who have long been closely intertwined with the Rothschilds—reported Lady de Rothschild’s endorsement of Romney, describing Lady de Rothschild as “a glamorous and die hard Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter whose antagonism toward Barack Obama has led her across the partisan aisle.”

Romney, in fact, prevailed over his challengers, and Lady de Rothschild and her allies decided to pull the plug on the centrist third party they were holding in reserve. Their big aim now is to deny Obama a second term, and Romney is clearly their chosen candidate to do it.

Lady de Rothschild had supported Mrs. Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination. She then vocally endorsed Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain over Obama, who she said was too “ideological” (that is, too liberal). This surprised many who perceived Obama as the Rothschilds’ golden boy.

As president, Obama confirmed Lady de Rothschild’s worst suspicions. As early as Feb. 28, 2010, writing on the Daily Beast, Lady de Rothschild said that “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.” Accusing Obama of being “beholden to the left,” Lady de Rothschild said he had “misled” the American people during the 2008 campaign about his “real plans for America.” She added that “his cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives.”

In the wake of her attacks on Obama, Lady de Rothschild began publicly promoting the AE centrist movement—along with a host of other influential figures, including veteran Democratic Party pollster Doug Schoen. They saw AE as both a tool to remove Obama from the White House and to prevent the rise of a serious populist and nationalist challenger from GOP ranks.

As recently as Dec. 5, the billionaire aristocrat published a screed at The Huffington Post, hailing AE, actually suggesting the new party—representing what she called “the radical center”—would “take on all the vested interests and the extremists in the political parties, in the media, in the streets and in the guts of Washington.”

Now that the power elite have thrown AE to the side, a remarkable coalition including the Rothschilds, the “birther” movement led by former Israeli Orly Taitz, white separatists joined with hardline Zionists, as well as many self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives” and others—are joining behind Romney—long seen as a “moderate” and “centrist” and even as a “liberal”—to put Obama out of the White House.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

April 21, 2012   AFP

Warhawk Romney Will Bankrupt U.S.

• Populists concerned about Republican candidate’s rabid internationalism, unabashed love for Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) hopes to mold the Republican Party’s 2012 national campaign platform into a document of nationalism and non-interventionism, he has a tough job ahead, for the global outlook of all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is firmly  internationalist and interventionist.

In fact, as AFP noted on Oct. 24, 2011, Romney’s first major foreign policy address delivered on Oct. 7 at the Citadel was a declaration of budget-busting, round-the-planet meddling, a promise of unending wars against an array of perceived enemies, ranging from Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan and billions of Muslims across the Earth.

“Endless trillions,” concluded AFP, “will continue to go down the black holes of the military-industrial banking police state.”

A rabid call for U.S. adventurism, Romney’s speech was full of rhetoric that, on its face, had a lot of energetic fervor that appealed to many good American patriots. He declared:

This century must be an American century. In an American century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world. God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will. Without American leadership,without clarity of American purpose and resolve, the world becomes a far more dangerous place, and liberty and prosperity would surely be among the first casualties.

However, while the language reflects the views expressed in Romney’s campaign book No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, there’s much more to it than meets the eye. And this is what is important for real patriots to understand:

The concept of an “American century”—a catchphrase of American internationalists of the Council on Foreign Relations school of thought going back to the post-World War II era—has seen its most recent incarnation in the theme of “American greatness”—also known as “American exceptionalism”—bandied about by the ex-Trotskyite hard-line pro-Israel neo-conservatives who orchestrated the United States into the no-win war in Iraq and who now push for a war against Iran.

Romney’s linguistics constitute a modern-day propaganda cover for old-fashioned Trostkyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government—a New World Order.

The specific foreign policy aims expressed by Romney were a virtual wish list for warmongers and profit-driven plutocrats. Although none of Romney’s five sons served in uniform, their father calls for a significant—some say “muscular”—role for the U.S. military abroad. Romney said, in part:

We are at war with Islamic fundamentalism. We must fight against the most ancient of prejudices: anti-Semitism.

In my first 100 days in office, I will . . . announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from nine ships per year to 15 [ships per year].

I will begin . . . the full deployment of a multi-layered national ballistic missile defense system. I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region.

I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination . . . an Iranian nuclear weapon is unacceptable. I will launch a campaign to advance economic opportunity in Latin America . . . free trade . . . I will reaffirm as a vital national interest Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. I will count as dear our special relationship with the United Kingdom. . . .

Romney’s saber-rattling against Iran, ritually embracing the mantra that Iran is a threat to not only Israel but to the United States, has been supplemented with equally dangerous bombast.

On CNN, Romney actually described modern Russia as America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” charging Russia “lines up with the world’s worst actors,” and that “Russia is not a friendly character on the world stage.”

That these words sound familiar is no surprise, considering those who constitute Romney’s most intimate advisors.

Notable among those whispering in Romney’s ear is Eliot A. Cohen—a longtime and foremost figure in military and geostrategic affairs, one of the most influential of the Zionist neo-conservative internationalists active today. A founding member of the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century—famed for suggesting America needed a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to jump-start U.S. involvement in new global military ventures—Cohen is one of multiple “neo-cons” who populate Romney’s inner circle.

But even more so, Romney prizes, in particular, an unusually close and long-standing personal (and political) alliance—going back 36 years—with no less than Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.

First openly revealed in candid detail by The New York Times on April 7—to the genuine surprise of many who were confounded by the link between the Michigan-born former Mormon missionary and the cosmopolitan Israeli-born Jew who graduated from high school in suburban Philadelphia—the Times described the relationship as “a warm friendship, little known to outsiders, that is now rich with political intrigue.”

Emphasizing that the Romney-Netanyahu axis is additionally “strengthened by a network of mutual friends and heightened by their conservative ideologies” the Times commented frankly that “the ties between Mr. Romney and Mr. Netanyahu stand out because there is little precedent for two politicians of their stature to have such a history together that predates their entry into government.”

The two met in 1976 while working at the Boston Consulting Group. Remaining in close contact, they regularly advised one another after both went into government on both domestic and foreign policy, having absorbed, the Times said, “the same profoundly analytical view of the world.”

What is disturbing—at least to American nationalists—is that, as the Times noted, “Romney has suggested that he would not make any significant policy decisions about Israel without consulting Mr. Netanyahu.” Even the Times—a staunchly pro-Israel voice—noted that this was “a level of deference that could raise eyebrows given Mr. Netanyahu’s polarizing reputation.”

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

 

 

 

 

‘American Exceptionalism’ Just More NWO Rhetoric

  By Michael Collins Piper

During the 2012 election campaign, you’ll probably be hearing a lot about “American exceptionalism,” particularly from the Republican presidential candidates. Newt Gingrich has made the concept a centerpiece of his campaign, and Gingrich’s wife—the current one, that is—has produced a documentary on the topic. Mitt Romney’s campaign book is entitled No Apology: The Case for American Greatness. Sarah Palin’s book, America by Heart, has a chapter entitled “America the Exceptional.” And former Sen. Rick Santorum and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty have also been heard touting the topic.

But don’t be fooled by rhetoric that has a lot of patriotic appeal. In fact, the concept of American exceptionalism— and a related theme known as national greatness conservatism—are really modern-day propaganda masks for old-fashioned Trotskyite communism: rapacious imperialism and internationalism now wrapped in the American flag, but no different from the age-old dream of a world imperium—a global government.

Many call it the New World Order. The wizards who conjured up these themes are three key figures in the so-called neo-conservative movement:

(read the rest…)

 

 

 

 

Plus d’infos:

Le néocon juif Eliot Cohen serait conseiller de Romney pour le Moyen-Orient

Sheldon Adelson: « je suis le juif le plus riche au monde »

Le père du PNAC William Kristol prédit que Joe Lieberman sera nommé secrétaire d’État par l’administration Romney

Un autre grand comique, propriétaire et éditeur d’un journal juif américain, soutient qu’il ne prônait pas vraiment l’assassinat d’Obama

Selon Frank J. Gaffney (PNAC), les Frères Musulmans ont infiltré et contrôlent l’administration Obama

Le mouvement des Birthers ou Quand les Patriotes font le travail de Netanyahou…

Posted in Non classé | Commentaires fermés