La mort du scientifique de l’anthrax : une autre mise en scène du Mossad ?

‘Suicide’ of Anthrax Scientist–Another Mossad Frame Up?
August 4, 2008
by Mark Glenn — crescentandcross

The last week of July, all across America could be heard an almost audible sigh of relief as headlines blared the news on the hour every hour that ‘he’ had finally been caught, the ‘he’ in this case being the infamous bioterrorist (unknown and unnamed up to this point) who sent deadly anthrax through the US mail system a mere week after the attacks of 9/11, leading to the deaths of 5.

What should have been heard across America however was a disquieting ‘hmmmm,’ as Americans scratched their heads and pondered the likelihood that the story being fed them concerning the ‘suicide’ of Ft. Dietrich bioweapons lab scientist Bruce E. Ivins was just another in a long string of lies, that it was not a suicide at all, but rather just one more cog in a Zionist-organized cover-up that has continued now for almost 7 years, beginning with 9/11.

There are good reasons for Americans to be skeptical about the recent news concerning the ‘suicide’ of bioweapons researcher Bruce Ivins (undoubtedly destined to be dubbed ‘Dr. Anthrax’ now that he is not here to defend his name) not the least of which is the timing of this event. In the first case, the news of his death arrived only a month after the US government was forced to pony up almost 6 million dollars to Steven Hatfill, the bioweapons researcher whose good name and reputation were destroyed as a result of the US Justice Department naming him a ‘person of interest’ shortly after the attacks when the only ‘evidence’ linking him to the infamous crimes came from a mouthy disinformation agent named Barbra Rosenberg. Secondly, it is a mere month before the anniversary of 9/11, and the fact that for the last 7 years the largest criminal investigation in US history (codenamed ‘Amerithrax’ for maximum effect) has turned up a big goose egg does not help things at a time when Uncle Sam is suffering from a serious credibility problem, both at home and abroad.

Those not recognizing the relevance of the aforementioned case involving Hatfill should keep in mind that the US DoJ losing a civil case against him (despite the scant news coverage it received) is like the town crier announcing to all within earshot that the case involving the anthrax attacks is not closed, and that the killer (or killers) is still on the loose. Obviously, given that the FBI always ‘gets its man’ this is gravely embarrassing, to say the least.

But more importantly, as any good cop will testify, a case not closed means a case still open, which means going back to square one and reviewing the evidence all over again in the hopes of finding something possibly missed. Obviously this means looking at information certain entities (and particularly those interested in dragging the US into Israel’s dirty wars) can’t afford to have exposed to public scrutiny, and in particular the evidence revolving around a certain Lt. Col. Phillip Zack.

For those who bought into the made-in-Israel storyline following the 2001 anthrax attacks that ‘the Ay-rabs did it,’ Zack was a researcher at the same Ft. Dietrich bio-weapons lab where the now ‘suicided’ Bruce Ivins worked. Along with Zack and Ivins was also one Ayyaad Assaad, an Egyptian-born scientist who became the butt of a concerted anti-Arab, anti-Islamic campaign organized and executed by Zack and some of his cohorts at the lab who collectively called themselves ‘the Camel Club’. A few days after 9/11 an anonymous letter turned up at a Marine base in Quantico Virginia accusing Assaad of being a terrorist planning biological attacks against America. According to Assaad’s testimony to the FBI agents who interviewed him, the personal information contained in the letter could only have been written by a co-worker at the lab, and surprise, surprise, a few days later, anthrax turns up in the mail. Furthermore, a security film caught Zack entering the Ft. Dietrich facility after hours at a time he no longer worked there, and more importantly, caught him on tape entering a secure section of the facility where the very same strain of anthrax used in the attacks later turned up missing. Given that the anthrax attacks amounted to the use of a weapon of mass destruction against the United States, naturally investigative eyes were on all persons considered relevant to the case, and–almost as if on cue–just about the time Zack and his anti-Arab bigotry started to circulate as clues in the case, the previously-mentioned Barbara Hatch Rosenberg floated the idea that Steven Hatfill should be put under the microscope, which he was, while all investigation of Zack slipped out the proverbial back door, never to be mentioned again.

In sum, Hatfill being exonerated means all bets are off and that more-likely culprits stand a good chance of being reconsidered for their possible (or probable) roles in the anthrax attacks following 9/11. More importantly though, it also means possible public exposure of the fact that the anthrax attacks were part of a carefully-coordinated false flag operation cooked up in the petri dish called Mossad headquarters aimed at inflaming Americans into going to war against Israel’s enemies, specifically Iraq.

And then, like a bolt out of the blue comes the ‘suicide’ of one Bruce Ivins who worked at the facility, and along with this a truck load of ‘evidence’ to suggest he was the culprit. Court testimony from a social worker claiming he was a dangerous psychopath planning on killing scores of people given a mere week before his ‘suicide’, along with the supportive testimony of psychiatrists who supposedly examined him.

Those who think it really is an open and shut case of suicide on the part of a guilty culprit should ask a few questions. If he really was ‘the guy’, why was he allowed to keep his security clearance at the weapons lab where he worked and (more importantly) where other infectious diseases that could have been used in additional attacks on America were stored? If he truly was about to be indicted for the anthrax attacks, why was he not scooped up by the FBI immediately, lest he flee the country, or worse, ‘go out in a blaze of glory’ as the previously-mentioned social worker claimed he swore he would do? Was Ivins about to go public with information he had concerning the real person (s) behind the attacks? And more importantly, where is Lt. Col Phillip Zack, the anti-Arab bigot filmed going into a secure area of Ft. Deitrich where the Ames strain of anthrax used in the attack was stored, after hours, where few (if any) witnesses could be found? Can rational persons assume he is sitting on a beach somewhere in Israel, far away from this discussion and–more importantly–from this investigation that the US DoJ is now saying will be closed as early as this week?

To anyone who recognizes the proclivity towards lying, frame-ups and cover-ups that exist on the part of Israel’s friends in Washington DC, the case involving Ivins wreaks of yet another in a long line of similar crimes. Just as Iraq was framed for 9/11 when not a microbe of evidence existed tying the two together, so too does it appear Bruce Ivins been framed for the anthrax attacks in order to protect the identity of the real perpetrators, the emphasis falling on the synonym of the second half of that word–‘traitors’.

Sadly–and despite the fact that the present made-in-Israel wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost them dearly–Americans will no doubt assume (as planned) that the suicide of the bioweapons scientist indicates his guilt. Just like Israel’s assassination of JFK (blamed on Lee Harvey Oswald) to Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty (that both the Jewish state and John McCain Sr ruled was an accident) to Israel’s role in 9/11, Americans will move on with their lives like dutiful little sheep, not realizing that the death of Ivins, the war, and the rising cost of fuel, food and just about every other necessary commodity are all directly related to each other.

Meanwhile, in places like New York, Tel Aviv and Washington DC, the persons responsible for all the aforementioned planned chaos will get together, and amidst smiles, snickers and handshakes and plot the next event designed to shyster American parents into sending their beloved sons and daughters off to fight and die for the Jewish state.

© 2008 Mark Glenn, Correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper

Controlled Media Suppresses Scientist’s ‘Big Secret’

By Michael Collins Piper

Although we are not likely to ever know whether accused anthrax terrorist Bruce Ivins really committed suicide, one particularly interesting aspect of the case has been buried by the mass media in America.

Although page after page of excruciatingly detailed information about Ivins’ personal life and career appeared in the major newspapers, the “big secret” about Ivins has been blacked out: he was a virulent Muslim-bashing supporter of Israel, a Christian by faith who trumpeted the mantra that the Jews are “God’s Chosen People.”

The Jewish Telegraph Agency acknowledged candidly on August 4 that these facts about Ivins were, in its words, “significant” because the notes accompanying the anthrax sent to various locales were designed to appear as though they were written by “a radical Islamist,” featuring such rhetoric as “Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great.”

The JTA article, which was published in Jewish community newspapers across America, revealed that the Frederick (Maryland) News Post had recently republished several letters that Ivins had written to that newspaper over the last several years, including one in which Ivins praised a rabbi for refusing to engage in dialogue with a Muslim cleric. Ivins wrote:

“By blood and faith, Jews are God’s chosen, and have no need for ‘dialogue’ with any gentile.” (The term “gentile” is a term of derision often openly used by Jews to refer to non-Jews, essentially meaning that non-Jews are akin to insensate beasts.)

But no major media in America took note of these revelations regarding Ivins’ ideology. And it has hardly even been noted on the Internet. A Google search of the Internet on August 17 of the terms “Ivins” and “God’s chosen” indicated only 564 references. A similar search of Google’s “news” section on the Internet indicated only four references to this story—and none of those references were in the pages of The Washington Post, The Washington Times, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times or any other “mainstream” daily newspaper.

Clearly, the masters of the media determined that American newspaper readers had the right to know the most personal details of Ivins’ life, but chose not to permit those readers to know of the pro-Israel ideological fervor that drove Ivins to mask his murderous attacks as the work of Muslim terrorists.

After all, this might cause Americans to raise questions as to whether other acts of terrorism—ascribed to “Muslim terrorists”—were really the work of Muslims at all, but instead “false flag” measures by Israel and its adherents to turn Americans against the Muslim world.

And if Ivins was involved in the mailing of anthrax-laden letters after 9-11, was he acting alone or at the behest of others?

Both Mark Glenn and Victor Thorn have written authoritative articles for AFP regarding the Ivins case. Among other things, they noted data suggesting Ivins was murdered and and evidence pointing toward involvement in the anthrax affair by yet another pro-Israel scientist, Philip Zack. Zack is accused of trying to frame a Muslim colleague for the crime.

So the entirety of the scenario remains a mystery. What we do know is that the controlled media is not telling us everything we need to know.

(Issue # 35, September 1, 2008)

This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.