Meet the Judas Goats. . .*
. . .The two-legged kind are far worse than the four-legged kind . . .
. . .“A Judas Goat is a term used to describe a trained goat used at a slaughterhouse and in general animal herding. The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination.
. . .“In stockyards, a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter, while its own life is spared. Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and onto trucks. The term Judas Goat is derived from a biblical reference to Judas Iscariot [who betrayed Jesus Christ to the Pharisees].
. . .“The phrase has also been used to describe a goat that is used to find feral goats that are targeted for eradication. The Judas Goat is outfitted with a transmitter, painted red and then released. The goat then finds the remaining herds of wild goats, allowing hunters to exterminate them.
—From Wikipedia, the Internet encyclopedia.
. . .“. . .Lambs were being led by a Judas goat into the chute. Two workers stood at the end, jolting the animals with enough electricity to render them brain dead. In an instant, prongs at the sheep’s brains and in the fleece near their hearts delivered a zap that collapsed them, after which they were handed through . . . to the kill floor. The Judas goats . . . then returned to the pens, where they collected another batch of sheep.”
—From:“A Slaughter House Tour” at karlschatz.com
. . .*With a special apology to the four-legged goats from the author — who loves all four-legged animals, including goats — for using this fitting term in the title of this book, which focuses on the two-legged Judas Goats.
Voir la photo ici:
Eric Hufschmid, dont la soeur a épousé Peter Murdoch,
le fils héritier de Rupert Murdoch.
Eric Hufschmid soutient que 99% des chercheurs de vérité sont des « agents sionistes » et accuse en bloc tous les chercheurs suivants:
Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick Toben, Mark Glenn, Mark Farrell, David Irving, David Duke, Michael Collins Piper, Victor Thorn aka Scott Makufka, Jim Hoffman, Wayne Madsen, Kurt Nimmo, Webster Tarpley, Willis Carto, Christopher Petherick, John Stadtmiller, Jeff Rense, William Rodriguez, Mike Rivero, Frank Weltner, Steven E. Jones, Ingrid Rimland, Linda Shelton, Christopher Jon Bjerknes, Hesham Tillawi, Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Ted Pike, Peter Kawaja, Ron Paul, Suzette Bates, Cindy Sheehan, Justin Raimondo, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, etc.
À NE PAS MANQUER
AUDIO – Entrevue avec Eustace Mullins à l’émission de Michael Colins Piper, 8 janvier 2007
Mullins et Piper dénoncent les menteurs C.Bollyn, E.Hufschmid et D.B.Smith. Mullins affirme que Smith s’est servi de lui et de sa notoriété pour attaquer des chercheurs sincères.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
By Curtis Maynard – News From The West Blog
Above, the cadaverous profile of Eric Hufschmidt, looks a bit like Michaell Chertoff huh?
Mike Delaney above
Talk about some nerve – this asshole Mike Delaney actually states that he knows more about the holocaust than Ernst Zundel! He then proceeds to shill for the known Zionist Jew disinformationist Eric Hufschmidt whose sister is actually married to Rupert Murdoch’s son [I shit you not]. HERE is Hufschmidt, in his own words, on his own website stating the same. If you believe that’s a coincidence, you’re one dumb sumbitch.
Delaney is also connected to another asshole Jew that goes by the name of Quest [Real name Evren Hun Welshons-Kaplan (His mother’s last name is Kaplan, as common a Jewish name as Goldfarb or Weinstein)]. Just last night this imbecile wrote a comment on my blog stating that he had read all of Ernst Zundel’s books on the holocaust. [Comment at bottom under his pseudonym « Quest.« ] When I chastized him for being a liar and moron as Zundel has never written a book on the holocaust, he was a publisher, not an author, Evren Kaplan shot back that he [Zundel] had written « Did Six Million Really Die. » As any revisionist knows, Richard Verrall, AKA Richard E. Harwood wrote that book and Zundel’s publishing company Samisdat published it. This would be the kind of statement one might expect from a Jew shill, they don’t bother to actually read revisionist works, they read excerpts and then expound on them with their superficial understanding. When caught they resort to name calling etc… it’s as predictable as finding Jew involvement in economic crime.
In any case, with the stroke of a pen, Mike Delaney has completely exposed himself and Prothink; he denounces Ernst Zundel and Kevin Macdonald as agents of Zion and at the same time attempts to rehabilitate a known Zionist shill, Eric Hufschmidt. Delaney pals around with a known Khazar Jew, Evren Kaplan, what is one to think? Hufschmidt was once associated with another informant named Daryl Bradford Smith, but when Smith was exposed for what he was, they split up hoping that Hufschmidt might maintain a modicum of credibility, which never really happened.
Read Delaney’s words below; my commentary in blue.
In Defense of Eric Hufschmidt
By Mike Delaney
This is in response to this recent article: http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2009/05/eric-hufschmid-deceiver-exposed.html
The label Jew, crypto Jew, agent, cointelpro, etc, etc gets thrown around these days as does cheese burgers get eaten by obese Americans at McDonalds. In this recent slander attack on Eric Hufschmid to call him a Jew, Grimm makes the case strictly of the biases that Eric states Zundel is working on the wrong side of the fence. [Ah, come on Mike, the fact that Hufschmidt’s sister is married to Super-Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s son is a pretty big fucking clue. You don’t mention this absolute, empirical fact, in your article either, how come?] I have to say that I find from my own experience that Eric usually calls out someone for a number of reasons but simplifies for his audience by calling them Jews/Zionists/working for Jews.
One reason for Eric calling people a Jew when they are probably not is the fact that some people are put up on pedestals for no apparent reasons or their actions are very Jew-like. Take the Zundel case for instance. The holocaust is clearly just obvious case of a Jew crime/hoax and Zundel does a good job stating this but so does many other people including Eric Hufschmid.
Why would Zundel limit himself to one issue and not highlight issues clearly provable like 9/11? I don’t personally take a stance on what I think Zundel is because quite frankly I don’t even look to him for information because he seems to know less then I do. [Now THAT my friends is called Chutzpah!]
The same goes for many others, Kevin Macdonald for instance doesn’t speak about 9/11 and the Holohoax. Why is that? [Because he’s a tenured professor that would be fired if he were to say anything publicly about the way he privately feels on the matter] I am sure I could hear a thousand excuses and I do understand he does have some excellent work otherwise, [LOL at « I understand » he [Professor Kevin Macdonald] does have « some » excellent work otherwise – this guy is almost too much. Reminds me of a cretin critiquing the work of a genius] but people lets face it, we need to expose these Jews on all fronts and as efficient as possible. The BIGGEST crime these people could go down for is not the kosher tax, Holohoax, etc, but 9/11. We clearly have the evidence to prove the Jews did 9/11! Why not speak about that? [Ernst Zundel is on record speaking about it you fucking bastard, he’s on record stating that he knew before the second building collapsed that it was a mossad/CIA operation, and this is almost certainly why ZOG bent over backwards to illegally arrest Zundel on trumped up charges, to illegally deport him to Kanada where ZOG knew he’d be rendered to Germany and spend a decade behind prison walls. If ZOG fears anyone it’s Ernst Zundel, there is no wayy in hell the governmennt was going to allow Ernst Zundel to exert 1/10th as much attention and energy on investigating 9-11, as he did on the holocaust. Ernst Zundel is a martyr and hero, you ignorant fool! You don’t deserve to even utter his name]
A slight problem I have, if I were to nitpick here, I have with both Grimm and Hufschmid is that both are still labeling this as a ‘Zionist’ problem. [Obviously this dipshit hasn’t even bothered to read anything Grimm’s written, Patrick has no problem with the word Jew.] I find it funny that people are still pigeonholed on saying the term Zionist, instead of Jew. This starts a whole new debate about when and were to ‘comprimise’ [speeling challenged itz] your message, which I wont do at all, a topic for another article. The one thing I can say about Hufschmid I know for sure is that he never ceases in pushing the biggest issues that would take down the Jew unlike many others. It’s a shame to see others who put 9/11 being a Jew job on the back burner for far less important issues.
Hufschmid has also been thee litmus test in the 9/11 movement to expose the real perps of 9/11. [ROTFLMWAO] It is certainly suspicious that people like Zundel and Grimm don’t harp on this 9/11 topic which I believe to be the biggest smoking gun that would bring these people down. [Again, this guyy blows more smoke out of his ass, proving he hasn’t read anything Grimm’s written] Between Hufschmid’s scientific debunking film, 9/11 Painful Deceptions, and my film showing WHO did it, Missing Links, it is easy to show this to people. Instead we get caught up in overwhelming people with numerous and far less important topics that makes the audience catatonic when it comes to action.
I am sure Hufschmid has called out people out inaccurately but everyone makes mistakes and the good he does far out ways the mistakes. [That’s « outweighs » you goddamn moron! It’s just a mistake really, anyone could denounce Ernst Zundel, a man that’s devoted his entire life to exposing the Jew and who has spent that last six years rotting away in a German prison for an opinion that doesn’t coincide with that of Jewry. Fuck You!] Ask yourself this, where we be right now if it hadn’t been for Hufschmid’s work? Maybe I would still be listening to Alex Jones. DBS of Iamthewitness.com wouldn’t have even been heard of like he is now [DBS AKA Daryl Bradford Smith is also a known informant]. Missing Links would never have been made. 9/11 and the controlling dissenting Jews would not have been exposed like they have been. Lets not forget it was of NO help from the pro-white movements to embrace or expose the truth about 9/11. For many years they were completely happen blaming ‘towelheads’ [That’s because people like Alex Linder of VNN, a so-called White nationalist site are informants and running false fronts for the feds] and even today don’t exploit this crime against their number 1 enemy like they cold. So ask yourself, before you step on toes to defame someone, make sure you have the story straight or that you have done better to even privilege yourself with the right to criticize. [Delaney should have kept the old adage, « It’s better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak up and remove all doubt, » in mind before writing this hit piece.]
Read comments on this blog entry here.
VIDEO – Rumeurs, Intox, les nouvelles guerres de l’info 2e partie, entrevue avec Eric Hufschmid. Voir la photo de lui au premier cycle de conférences de Jimmy Walters, aux côtés du désinformateur Chris Bollyn et du menteur du 11 septembre Thierry Meyssan, qui est convaincu, comme Alex Jones, qu’Israël n’a pas pu faire le 11 septembre. Le fait que Jimmy Walter a personnellement déboursé des millions de dollars pour dénoncer le complot du 11 septembre, et le fait que William Rodriguez soit un héro du 11 septembre au WTC, n’a pas empêché Bollyn et Hufschmid de les accuser d’être des « agents sionistes »!
by Michael Collins Piper
9-11 and the New Internet Paradigm:
The Necessity for High-Level Manipulation and
Control of the Dissemination of Information
Canadian Zionist conservative Jonathan Kay has been among the foremost critics of the growing number of people in the United States and around the globe who have questioned the official version of what really happened on September 11.
First referenced in Chapter 17, Kay’s recent book—Among the Truthers: A Journey Through America’s Growing Conspiracist Underground—outlines Kay’s concerns about a variety of conspiracy theories, but makes clear his foremost worry is the blossoming of 9-11 conspiracies in particular and that an inordinate number of 9-11 “truthers” point the finger at Israel for that crime.
However, of course, the truth is that most 9-11 dissidents are still largely determined to direct the blame for 9-11 at George W. Bush or the CIA or “the military-industrial complex” or the Illuminati or some combination thereof. Many who do suspect Israeli complicity would just simply not even mention it.
And then, naturally—and this must be said—there are also considerable numbers of agents provocateurs who have infiltrated the 9-11 truth movement (just as they infiltrated the JFK assassination and Oklahoma City truth seekers) who are consciously (and often quite successfully) muddying the waters of research through their insertion of distractions and distortions that redirect focus away from the real conspirators responsible for those terrorist tragedies.
And this is something that is critical to remember: at the time of the JFK assassination there was no Internet. And at the time of the Oklahoma City bombing, the Internet was in its infancy.
The growing public awareness that something was wrong with the official explanation of the JFK assassination was largely stimulated through books, magazine articles, and lectures at small gatherings around the country by pioneer researchers such as Mark Lane and Penn Jones and others whose efforts were supplemented considerably by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison’s journey into the realm.
Literally, word-of-mouth became—during the mid-1960s and beyond—one of the primarily means of broadening discussion about the Warren Commission cover-up.
And needless to say, during this time—and we now know this for a fact—the CIA was in the front-line (although largely operating behind the scenes)—along with the FBI—in doing a great deal of mischief designed to confuse research into the JFK assassination.
And, I think, it’s also fair to say that the Mossad’s own fine hand—through its assets in the mainstream media, in particular—also played a major part in providing vital support to the intrigues of the CIA and the FBI in this regard.
Essentially the same scenario came in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing. This time, with the rise of desktop publishing and desktop video production, those who were dissenting against the official version of events had, in some respects, even greater outreach than the JFK researchers who were giving headaches to those responsible for the official cover-up.
And the advent of the Internet—though, as we said, still in its earliest days of development—added another dimension that gave considerable outreach to the critics of the government’s lies surrounding the Oklahoma tragedy.
But by the time of the 9-11 disaster, the Internet was already holding sway, and it proved to be a valuable asset in so many ways for those who were seeking to research the story behind the story of 9-11 and to communicate their findings to the American people and to the world.
As a direct consequence, the powers-that-be—whomever you choose to identify as such—realized that the Internet could prove to be a very real danger to their continuing domination of the mass print and broadcast media in the United States and around the globe.
As such, the powers-that-be realized they simply had to find ways to be able to circumvent the growing truth movement—a veritable tsunami that was piling up and preparing to swamp the conspirators and the lies about 9-11 purveyed upon the American people.
In addition to this, another (very negative) aspect of the Internet must be considered.
While the Internet has indeed been a major venue for truth—about 9-11 and so many other matters—the Internet has also set the stage for a growing amount of disinformation (both deliberate and unintentional that has had the effect of negating the very good research on 9-11 and other issues that has been achieved by sincere truth-seekers.
Ironically, in this regard, the aforementioned Zionist propagandist, Jonathan Kay, has summarized the matter well:
Elaborate conspiracy theories now can be cobbled together literally overnight through the efforts of hundreds of scattered dilettante conspiracists.
Another result is that conspiracists all around the world now tend to focus on the same few dozen talking points that figure prominently on the top websites.
While Kay doesn’t say it (and he is essentially celebrating this point) the truth is that what Kay calls, in this regard, the “intellectual balkanization,” that has resulted means that if some bad information—that is, disinformation (deliberate or otherwise)—has been inserted into the debate, that disinformation manages to become an article of faith.
And the result is that serious, fact-focused researchers—those who pay strict attention to detail and try to correct the mistakes—often end up being accused of being the disinformation specialists when, in fact, they are the real truth seekers trying to discredit the disinformation!
Kay assesses the situation in all-too-accurate terms:
The Internet has produced a radical democratization of the conspiracist marketplace of ideas.
No longer does one have to spend years researching and writing a book to attract attention: One can simply set up a blog, or chime in on someone else’s, with some refinement of the existing collective lore.
In fact, today’s conspiracists don’t even have to read books—they can pick up all their talking points from Truther websites, or, better yet, from Truther propaganda videos.
And the problem is, as we’ve said, that these websites and videos that Kay refers to sarcastically as the work of those whom he dismisses as “Truther” sources are not always—in fact, often are not—very reliable sources at all, either as a consequence of slip-shod research or simply the result of just bad writing that conveys false ideas as fact.
What has happened is that—just as Kay has said—many people have been propelled into what Kay calls “paranoid echo chambers,” in which people repeat back to one another—via email, via websites, in books and articles based on that material—an array of misinformation and disinformation that adds nothing to serious conspiracy inquiry and certainly does it a disservice (which is something that Kay and others of similar mindset certainly like to see happening).
Again, Kay is all-too-unfortunately on the mark when he writes:
The conspiracist’s network of enablers grows—often to such a point that it crowds out the conspiracy theorist’s nonbelieving friends. The process resembles the formation of an electronic cocoon that envelops a conspiracist with codependents. Surrounded by an enabling group of the like-minded, he gradually embraces the delusion that his movement has gained critical mass . . . .
The consequence is that Kay is absolutely correct when he refers to the “dumbing down effect” that is arising as a result of the growing world of Internet conspiracy dabbling and he is very much again on target—all too much so—when he suggests that modern-day conspiracy theorizing is something that many people “fit in between video gaming and Facebook.”
In other words, what Kay calls “conspiracism” is emerging, in many respects, as simply a hobby, a new form of entertainment!
Many people—and these are good people—just don’t realize that the world of conspiracy research is not some game, but a deadly serious realm that intersects with the very real world of high-level conspiracies shaping the course of our future.
So the bottom line truth is that while the Internet has been a valuable tool for genuine truth-seekers, the Internet—by its very nature—has also become (particularly in the wake of 9-11) as a considerable and important resource in the dangerous high-tech arsenal of those who seek to manipulate and misinform the public, most especially those who rely on the Internet as a source of information about the very conspiracies that the real conspirators are engaged in.
The 9-11 experience, so to speak, thus proved to be a very real lesson for those responsible for 9-11 and its cover-up, for they were able to observe (and quite carefully) the manner in which information relating to 9-11 emerged and then circulated via email and other means of Internet communication, including YouTube and other new formats known as “social media.”
And, for the record, it has long been an article of faith—and a reasonable one—that in actual preparation for the orchestration of 9-11, the conspirators had already set in place more than a handful of individuals, websites and other means charged with the evil task of “infiltrating” and manipulating and distorting legitimate efforts to uncover the real truth about 9-11.
In fact, after 9-11, there emerged more than a few people who might be called “instant internet celebrities” who became known as “9-11 truthers” but who were—from the beginning—bought-and-paid-for assets of the high-level forces responsible for 9-11 in the first place.
An entire book could be written about some of these characters, but that’s another matter for another time. But suffice it to say, they made their influence felt (in one way or another) and had a considerable impact in shaping not only the 9-11 truth movement itself, but also by offering up opinions about other matters (various and sundry) that also had the effect of delegitimizing very real research (some of it based on years of study) that countered the intrigues of the global elite.
Many of these operatives spent much of their time putting out what could only be described as downright “crazy” theories about 9-11 that redirected attention away from sober, responsible research.
In other instances, they specialized in cranking out often-reckless theories that were quite easily refutable, therefore giving credence to the oft-heard claim from the mainstream media that any and all other dissident 9-11 research was just as silly and unreliable.
And in a number of instances, there were several 9-11 “truthers” who, while pointing the finger of blame at Israel, were (at the same time) engaging in other activity that led many observers to believe that these individuals were “black propaganda” operatives trying to bring discredit to those who believed Israel was indeed responsible for 9-11.
Two such individuals, Christopher Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid—whom many believe were “ringers” inserted into the 9-11 truth movement from the beginning—ingratiated themselves with American Free Press (having pretended to be enthusiastic about my book Final Judgment) and, over a period of time, engaged in a concerted effort to influence AFP’s coverage of 9-11—and not in a positive way.
Ultimately AFP discovered that while Bollyn and Hufschmid supplied a lot of “good” information, that data was mixed in with a variety of “bad” data, the consequence of which was that many of the stories the two generated (working hand-in-hand on a daily basis behind the scenes for well over a year) proved to be of rather dubious value.
At one juncture, Bollyn and Hufschmid tried to convince the editors of AFP that outspoken 9-11 survivor, William Rodriguez—who had been honored by 9-11 truth seekers all over the United States and around the world for his integrity—was some sort of “Zionist agent.”
And despite the fact that independently wealthy American philanthropist Jimmy Walter had bankrolled speaking engagements by both Bollyn and Hufschmid, the dynamic duo also spread the word that Walter—who spent millions of dollars of his own money seeking to alert the public to 9-11 truth—was also a stooge for Israeli interests.
For my own part, I spent an entire week in Malaysia in the company of both Rodriguez and Walter and I never saw any sign that they were working to advance Zionist interests in any way, shape or form.
However, considering the record of Bollyn and Hufschmid, I think it’s safe to say that the same thing cannot be said about them.
Considering all of this, more than a handful of 9-11 dissidents (including many who believed Israel was behind 9-11) ultimately came to conclude Bollyn was actually a disinformation agent using a perverse back-handed way of discrediting AFP and those who believed the Mossad was responsible for 9-11.
Bollyn’s critics correctly pointed out that Bollyn had a pattern of misquoting sources, misinterpreting scientific information, and making assertions about certain matters without any foundational authority.
The consequence was that Bollyn’s disinformation gave ammunition to critics of AFP’s contention that the Mossad was behind 9-11 and as such was enthusiastically bandied about by Zionist propagandists seeking to undermine AFP’s thesis even though the questionable material by Bollyn focused on scientific data that had nothing whatsoever to do with the specific matter of Mossad involvement in 9-11.
In the end, after their deception was unmasked, Bollyn and Hufschmid launched a smear campaign against AFP alleging that we were, too, were really “Zionist agents” trying to cover up Mossad involvement in 9-11, an allegation preposterous on its face to anyone familiar with AFP’s work. Bollyn even claimed that Mark Lane—the anti-Zionist Jewish critic of Israel who pinpointed the CIA’s role in the JFK assassination conspiracy—was a Zionist and a secret asset of the CIA!
Unfortunately—and not unpredictably—a few naive folks actually believed these liars, especially people new to the 9-11 truth movement who didn’t have access to the big picture. However, when all was said and done, the romance between Bollyn and Hufschmid came to a bitter end and the two began accusing one another of being Zionist agents!
And the strange outside possibility was that both of them could actually have been right. After all, not all Zionist agents necessarily know the identities of the others. That’s how complex the world of intelligence intrigue happens to be.
Hufschmid’s own website devolved into a mish-mash of weird commentary (often referencing sexual matters, especially human interaction with animals) and once even included a nude photograph of Hufschmid, taken from the rear, ostensibly for the purpose of explaining some “health” matter Hufschmid felt would interest his readers.
That Bollyn, an American, had spent time on an Israeli kibbutz and later married an Israeli woman—who worked for Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency—was a point many found telling. That his own sister was also married to a Jew and had taken up residence in Israel was also considered somewhat suspicious.
It’s always been my suspicion (based on a variety of data too complicated to delve into here) that Bollyn was a long-standing international free-lance intelligence operative who, for at least a substantial part of his career, was working for the Church of England, which—although many people don’t realize it—has always been an arm of British intelligence, active in global intrigue. In fact, Bollyn and his family have multiple “British” connections which also point toward that conclusion.
And, needless to say, the British Empire—which has long been under the control of the Rothschild Dynasty—has always played a peculiar role in advancing Jewish and Zionist interests, even going back to the days when the woman whom Bollyn claims as an ancestor, Anne Boleyn, was a central player in a grand design that disrupted the traditional role of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain and set the stage for the rise of Jewish financial power in Britain in years to come. (And that is a story in and of itself—worthy of a book that has yet to be written.)
But for those who are interested, an English patriot and critic of the New World order with an abiding interest in 9-11 truth—and who does believe Israel was a key player in that tragedy—has put together a remarkably detailed website (complete with a fascinating variety of links and other valuable information) which delves into the bizarre story of Bollyn and his erstwhile friend Hufschmid. See http://www.takeourworldback.com for more.
In any event, all of this having been said, it’s quite clear that the circumstances surrounding 9-11 gave Israel—along with other power players on the world stage—a new understanding of how the Internet worked and how its resources could be utilized (for better or for worse) in manipulating global opinion.
And as a consequence, people in high places began working to lay forth a plan to ensure that, in the future, the Internet could be used for their own benefit and to undercut those—such as the 9-11 dissidents and other truth-seekers who questioned “official” stories about such matters as the JFK assassination and the Oklahoma bombing and other matters—who stood in opposition to the New World Order agenda.
As we shall see, this carefully-crafted endeavor had even further consequences when the plan was skillfully put into actual working order in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Connecticut and the Boston Marathon bombing that followed not long afterward.
The Internet, as a consequence, was no longer simply a venue for truth seekers to “get the word out” about high-level cover-ups. Instead, it became a vehicle used by the high-level conspirators to not only confuse the work of the truth seekers but also to combat them by discrediting them through some of the most manipulative means possible.
It’s a story that has never been told before, but it is a story that must be told, if real truth seekers are going to be able to deal with the big challenges that lie ahead, particularly when confronted with propaganda and disinformation designed to frustrate their efforts to combat the very real forces of Evil that lie behind the New World Order.
Let us then move forward and examine this extraordinary conspiracy in a way that it has never before been dissected. It’s a shocker . . .