Qui est le « tireur fou » du Musée de l’Holocauste?

Est-ce seulement une coïncidence si l’incident du Musée de l’Holocauste est advenu exactement durant la semaine de l’anniversaire du USS Liberty?

Glenn Beck, bouc Judas de la droite conservatrice américaine.

Concernant la tragédie, c’est probablement pas un hasard si elle tombe la même semaine que la commémoration de l’attaque du USS Liberty par Israel (dont personne ne parle et dont les « propagandistes » sont qualifiés d’antisémites, si c’est pas de « haineux néo-nazis du KKK »).

Mais il y a un autre niveau dont on a moins entendu parler. Les médias américains ont mentionné l’existence de « liens d’amitié de longue date » entre Willis Carto et le tireur fou du Musée de l’Holocauste, comme quoi il aurait travaillé pour Carto il y a des années.

Une mise au point d’impose quant à ces prétendus liens. (Je prends mes infos de Mike Piper, qui est très proche de Carto et qui travaille pour lui — pour l’American Free Press et avant ça pour le Spotlight — depuis près de 25 ans.)

Les médias ont dit que von Brunn était un ami et admirateur de Carto. En fait, Carto ne se souvenait pas de lui et il a fallu qu’on lui rappelle les détails pour enfin qu’il se souvienne d’avoir rencontré ce gars à quelques reprises. Et tout ce que ce von Brunn a fait (il a même écrit à ce sujet) c’est essayer de lui soutirer de l’argent pour ses « projets »… Ce que Carto a toujours refusé. Cette « amitié de longue date » n’a jamais existé, et c’est précisément pourquoi von Brunn haissait Willis Carto. Il haissait aussi Liberty Lobby, le journal The Spotlight et sa réincarnation en American Free Press, parce qu’il trouvait qu’ils étaient trop doux envers les juifs.

De plus, environ six semaines avant la tragédie, von Brunn diffusait un article qui était une attaque virulente contre Carto!

Les médias ont dit que Carto était un grand supporteur de von Brunn et vice versa… Ce qui est faux.

Ils ont même dit que von Brunn avait modifié des articles de wikipedia pour mettre en valeur Willis Carto et American Free Press. La vérité est que von Brunn a changé wikipedia pour y écrire des choses qui attaquaient Carto!

Un certain Stan lié à l’American Free Press s’est souvenu d’avoir eu cet énergumène de von Brunn dans les pattes pendant quelqeus mois, cherchant un moyen qu’il sorte de sa vie car il manifestait des tendances violentes. Von Brunn était d’un caractère exagérément fâché et déplaisant, presque épeurant, et ça lui empoisonnait la vie. Bref, von Brunn était erratique, voire carrément un fou. (Cela a pu le rend manipulable au point qu’il pète les plombs et prenne son fusil pour « aller régler ses comptes… »)

Tous ce mensonge contre les révisionnistes et les anti-sionistes en général, et contre Willis Carto en particulier, est évidemment motivé politiquement.

On voit déjà l’ADL et les autres groupes juifs contre la haine récupèrent ça politiquement, pour Israel, et pour « garder vivante » la mémoire de la Shoah!

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Now Playing at the « Holocaust Museum » – The Lone Nut

(What a « coincidence »!)
by Michael Hoffman
Copyright©2009 RevisionistHistory.org

Today another « lone nut »has changed the course of history. Like « lone nut » James Earl Ray and « lone nut » Sirhan Sirhan, as well as « lone nuts » Arthur Bremer and Ted Kaczynski, James von Brunn now joins the ranks of the Cryptocracy’s hit parade. What a « coincidence »!

With his shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Museum, Von Brunn has reinvigorated the old 20th century Black/Zionist coalition, on the very day when African-American U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was due to visit the museum to hear a reading of the script of « Anne and Emmett, » a play about Anne Frank and Emmet Till. What a « coincidence »!

The author of the « Anne and Emmett » play is Janet Langhart Cohen, the Black wife of former Secretary of Defense William Cohen who directed American forces during the NATO holocaust against the churches, monasteries and people of Christian Serbia in 1999. What a « coincidence »!

Von Brunn has acted a part in the self-fulfilling prophecy of The Holocaust mythos, by reenacting it in miniature. By doing so he will enter the museum’s canon of devil goyim who can’t seem to resist attacking symbols of Judaic culture and innocence. He has victimized the eternal victims, squaring their vision of themselves as forever hated and perpetually persecuted. What a « coincidence »!

The religion of Orthodox Judaism is designed so as to capitalize on and benefit from any violent attack on it or it adherents. Without such violence from outsiders, attacks are sometimes orchestrated from within.

During the regime of Republican President George W. Bush, the « threat from the extreme Right » was de-emphasized by the Cryptocracy. White crusader golem were needed to support and staff the war in Afghanistan against Muslims, and the war in Iraq against Arabs. With those goals now pretty much accomplished and a Black Democrat in the White House, the powers-that-be seem to have decided to reanimate the « extreme Right wing threat » and raise it back to the marquee bogeyman role it played during the regime of Bill Clinton, when the Oklahoma City Bombing was mounted by a supposed lone nut duo, but which researchers like David Hoffman (no relation to this writer) have reported was a conspiracy deeply connected to the US government itself — including to such government front groups as the « Aryan Republican Army » bank-robbery gang and « Aryan Nations. »

Since Americans are saddled generation after generation with a government-mouthpiece media, the lone nut gambit remains forever young in the eyes of those who are dependent for their news on echo-chamber journalists and talking heads who repeat as gospel whatever officialdom happens to declare about the gunman.

Years later, « when the hurly burly’s done and the battle’s lost and won, » the real conspiracy is usually thawed for public consumption. For example, there are few independent thinkers today who believe that McVeigh and his sidekick single-handedly destroyed the Murrah building, or that Ray Killed Martin Luther King, or that Kaczynski was not a patsy like Lee Harvey Oswald.

For now, however, the alchemical processing cooker is on high as the groundwork for the criminalization of « Holocaust’ denial » is being established, and the high priests of Holocaustianity are given renewed pledges of unquestioning obeisance by America’s governing class and opinion-moulding elite. As the script thickens its plot line, hysterical idolization of all things Judaic, rabbinic and Israeli approaches vertiginous new heights of fawning subservience.

The 400 children murdered last December and January in Gaza by the descendants of « Holocaust’ Survivors, » have been deposited in the dustbin of history. There never was and never will be an exhibit at the synagogue-masquerading-as-a-museum about the the horrors of the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians; but it won’t be long before the iconic image of a Black policeman who died defending America’s most hallowed Judaic shrine, will earn a perpetual memorial there.

Our masters govern by methods that overrule all documentation and silence all arguments: assassination, stealth, treachery, the doublecross and most of all, the inculcation of the doublemind. Their guarantee of last resort comes courtesy of a bullet fired by a « lone nut » who emerges from obscurity to rescue the Cryptocracy’s chestnuts from an impending fire, or secure it victory where it would otherwise experience eclipse. What a « coincidence »!

James von Brunn’s six-pointed star will forever shine in the Cryptocracy’s lone nut firmament.

For further research: Synagogue Bomb Plot
Hoffman writes from the foothills of the Bitterroot Mountain range of north Idaho. His work is sustained by donations and the sale of his books and recordings.


James von Brunn hated Christianity

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following anti-Christian rant has been attributed to James von Brunn, the accused assailant at the « Holocaust Museum. » As Christians we are publishing this disgusting statement alleged to be his (from a website called antichrist.net) not because we endorse it (in fact we utterly condemn it) — but to demonstrate that the seeming Manchurian Candidate James von Brunn was not part of our movement and his deeds cannot be attributed to Christian revisionists.

If this is in fact Von Brunn’s authentic writing, then he extols race as much as any rabbi.
Strange indeed is the degree to which he allegedly fired his gun on cue, timed to support the game plan of the Cryptocracy.

by James W. von Brunn

As duped Aryan sheep begin to understand the « Holocaust » they also begin to better understand Christianity. Both have similar origins. Both have identical objectives.

Saul of Tarsus, after helping friends stone to death a disciple of Jesus Christ, set forth toward Damascus. As he trudged the dusty road a blinding, excruciating light suddenly crashed his brain. The world whirled into a crimson vortex. He heard his own scream, far away. Then there was quiet. When he awoke he was lying on the road. He looked up. A man in a white cloak was standing there his hands outstretched. His hands bore deep scars. Saul trembled with fright. Then Jesus smiled, pulling Saul upright, saying, « Fear not, Saul of Tarsus, I come to you from our Father. » It was a miracle.

Saul and Jesus earnestly, fervently, joyously conversed with one another. Arm in arm they tarried there. Jesus told Saul he was his own. Jesus was loving, loving, forgiving, forgiving. Saul became his disciple there and then — struck by the Holy Spirit. Finally, following Saul’s vows of fidelity, love, and obedience, the visitation ended when, before Saul’s wondering awe-struck eyes, Jesus to Heaven in a halo did rise. It was a miracle.

We are told that this extra-sensory experience, somewhat like an epileptic fit, suddenly changed the hateful, murderer Saul (later, St. Paul) from a hater of Jesus into a Jesus lover. Really?

Saul, ten years younger, had not met The Master vis a vis before Jesus’ crucifixion. Had they met earlier Saul probably would have crushed Christ’s head with a rock. Saul, and most Israelis, detested Jesus and his blasphemous ideology almost as much as they detested Romans; more even than they detested Greeks, Babylonians, Assyrians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Persians, et al. In truth, as bigoted Judeophobes know, God’s « Chosen People » hated their God’s only Son.

Matthew emphatically states that Israelis so hated Jesus Christ that THEY crucified him (Pope John Paul II, Zionist, said that Matthew is wrong! What’s that? « The Word of God » is wrong?).

ACTUALLY, on the road to Damascus — brooding about Rome, relishing the bloody image of the disciple he had stoned to death; sweaty, sore footed, thinking of the blasphemous ravings of the Nazarene — Saul had an incredible, earthshaking IDEA. A light-bulb inspiration. He, Saul — a Roman citizen — suddenly realized how he could destroy Rome! Saul trembled uncontrollably with fear and joy. He would simply promulgate the insane teachings of Jesus! What better way to destroy a Nation — any Nation — than to undermine her hubris; her gods, ethics, mores, history, her gene-pool — in short, Saul would DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE. Then, as night follows day, with her foundations rotted, the Roman Empire would FALL. Saul decided to begin the HOAX by inventing a miraculous encounter on the road to Damascus with the reincarnated Jesus the Christ!

Toward that end — no different than Hollywood script-writers today — Saul created a bogus a la Spielberg docu-drama stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation — a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep — he named his hoax « Christianity. »

The New Testament was written in Greek. Paul – who believed the World was flat, that Joshua made the sun stand still, and Jehovah spoke from a burning bush — wrote one-third of it, perhaps more. The events described in the 24 Books are often contradictory, fail the time-line, defy both archaeology’s and nature’s immutable laws, and are suicidal if practiced.
Nevertheless, the shamans bought it, taught it, and the illiterate public was coerced, brainwashed, threatened, tortured, murdered, and enthralled. The Encyclopedia Britannica states that over 6,000 major redactions exist between the Septuagint (translation of Aramaic into Greek) and its St. James biblical translation.

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh’s Kingdom of Heaven. To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH’s children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus’ father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness. Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet — kill them. Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell. And it is written, « A little child shall lead them. »

These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!

The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION … CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

« Christianity » destroyed Roman Civilization. The « Holocaust » Religion is destroying Western Civilization. The Aryan gene-pool dies, « unwept, unhonored and unsung. »

Friday, June 12, 2009

James von Brunn: The Shimon ben Yohai of « The White Race,  » and His Contribution to Holocaustolatry

Manchurian candidate, James von Brunn has prepared the altar. Now comes the procession of bishops to incense the idol of Holocaustolatry, once again. The liturgical season of « The Holocaust » never ends.

James von Brunn, like the rabbis, is an anti-Christian racial determinist. He’s mentally programmed to behave in an anti-Christian rabbinic manner. Like the rabbis, who teach that « Amalek » is a genetically programmed enemy of « The Jews » and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed, HERE, HERE, and HERE, so does James von Brunn believe that « The Jews » are genetically programmed enemies of « The White Race » and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed, HERE (scroll to bottom). In essence, there is no difference between James von Brunn and Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai who he paraphrased in the title of his book, Kill the Best Gentiles. But one of these race haters is sainted while the other will live in infamy in accordance with the crazy double-standards of this crazy, racist world, which the bishops honor above all.

And here is Cardinal George sanctifying the « hallowed space » of the U.S. Holocaust Museum and calling for more « education » against every kind of bias (except pro-Judaic bias, of course). No, Cardinal George, the world needs the Gospel, the teachings of Jesus Christ which your elder brothers are attempting to destroy with their « education » and Holocaustolatry.

Cardinal calls shooting at US Holocaust museum ‘appalling’

Friday 12 June 2009

WASHINGTON (CNS) – The president of the United States bishops’ conference called the June 10 shooting at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum that left a security guard dead « appalling ».

James von Brunn, identified as an 88-year-old Holocaust denier and white supremacist, opened fire in the Washington museum and fatally shot guard Stephen Johns, 39, according to The Associated Press.

The shooting « was a deplorable act of violence and a violation of a hallowed space in our nation’s capital, » said Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago in a statement released June 11 by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington.

« This tragic incident only serves to reinforce the need for continued education throughout society against bias of every kind, but most especially racial and religious prejudice, » he said.

In a separate statement Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl of Washington said June 11 the murder was « particularly distressing given the museum’s special mission to educate our world about violence and be a living reminder of the harm that comes from hatred and anger. »

« It is our prayer that Mr. Johns rest in God’s eternal embrace and that this loss be a call to each of us for a renewed commitment to building a world of peace and respect for all people, » Archbishop Wuerl said.

The archdiocese collaborates with the museum, the bishops’ conference and other groups each year to train Catholic school educators to teach their students about anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, prejudice and Catholic-Jewish relations.

In his statement Cardinal George said that that « by preserving the memory of the 6 million Jews who died in the Shoah, the museum speaks to the consciences of all who pass through its doors and hear the powerful stories of the innocent men, women and children who lost their lives at the hands of a criminal regime. »

He noted that annually millions of the visitors to the museum « learn of the dangers of unchecked hatred and of the need to prevent genocide wherever it threatens. »

The cardinal, on behalf of the U.S. bishops, offered condolences to the Johns family and said the Catholic leaders are « committed to promoting human dignity and interreligious peace throughout our nation. »

« We echo the words of Pope Benedict XVI: ‘May the Shoah be a warning for all against forgetfulness, denial or reductionism, because violence committed against one single human being is violence against all,' » he said.


Question about Von Brunn’s relations with cryptocracy

Discussion of Holocaust to Be Banned?

By Michael Collins Piper

The recent tragic death of a security guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, allegedly killed by an individual said to be a “Holocaust denier” is now being touted as a reason to institute laws in the United States similar to those laws outlawing so-called “Holocaust denial” in force in 14 countries, mostly in Western Europe.

However, long-standing evidence suggests that those who advocate such measures in the United States do not intend to directly confront the issue of “Holocaust denial” in pushing such legislation. Rather, they intend to deal with the issue through an insidious tactical “back door” approach.

The scheme has been in the works for a long time and is not to be confused with the long-standing drive (once again before Congress) to set up a federal “hate crimes” bureaucracy.

Here’s the story that’s not been reported anywhere else: On June 12, the conservative Washington Times—which regularly touts the globalist and Zionist agenda—featured a headline story announcing that “Debate arises on legality of Holocaust denial,” as a consequence of what happened at the Holocaust Museum, adding fuel to the fire.

So now the propaganda drive for legislation targeting not just “Holocaust denial” but all manner of political freedom of expression is being rejuvenated.

Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, the wealthy American founder of the Israel Project, one of many well-funded Jewish lobby operations, was quoted in the Washington Times article as saying that public distribution of so-called “hate literature” as well as “hate” on public access cable should be outlawed.

And although the Times quoted officials from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith as saying the ADL does not advocate laws criminalizing “Holocaust denial” in America, the fact is that for more than 20 years the ADL has been in the forefront of a coordinated effort to pave the way for legislation designed to suppress speech in the U.S. the ADL considers dangerous to its agenda.

The ADL’s plan is to outlaw what it called “group defamation” that could be considered hurtful against certain specifically identifiable groups of people and thus potentially spark violence against them. In fact, the ADL’s contention is that hurtful language actually constitutes “violence” in and of itself.

In other words, if an individual criticized the actions of the state of Israel for its recent bloody incursion into Gaza, this could be considered offensive by American Jewish supporters of Israel and, in turn, those criticisms of Israel could cause other Americans to become angry at the supporters of Israel. As a consequence of this, it is said, violence could occur.

Or, for example, if someone raised questions about the number of Jews who died in Europe during the Holocaust and suggested that the numbers had been inflated by Jewish groups for political benefit and financial profit—this is considered a form of “Holocaust denial” in Europe today—Jewish people could be “hurt” because their integrity was being questioned and it might cause others to think badly of them.

If this sounds unlikely or extraordinary, consider the documented record of the ADL in this regard.

In 1988 at Hofstra University in New York, the ADL conducted a three-day legal symposium entitled “Group Defamation and Freedom of Speech: The Relationship Between Language and Violence.” The forum concluded with a call for passage of a law to ban what was described as “hate literature” by so-called “extremists.”

The opinions expressed by the featured speakers at the ADL conclave advocating a ban on hate literature centered around two ideas:

� That words, written or spoken, in and of themselves, constitute violence. (For example, one need only call someone a “bad” name without threatening any physical action to perform an act of violence.)

� That words, written or spoken, take on a certain power that creates a reality for the target or victim of these words. (For example, by calling someone a “dirty rotten bum,” he will become one.)

In his opening remarks, Hofstra law professor Monroe Freedman said that trying to defend free speech while trying to protect minorities against those who “defame” them is a “paradox of Constitutional democracy.”

According to Freedman:

Group defamation can create a social climate that is receptive to and encourages hatred and oppression. If a minority group can be made to appear less than human, deserving of punishment, or a threat to the general community, oppression of that minority is a likely consequence.

We know also that language itself can hurt, that there are words that, by their very utterance, inflict injury. . . .When the message is violent, language can itself be violence.

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) spoke of the “psychic pain” inflicted by language. Another speaker, self-described “Holocaust survivor” Elie Wiesel, injected his opinion that those engaging in group defamation should be “fought” and “dealt with harshly.”

The conference featured a moot court argument of the winning submission of a competition among law students around the nation to write a model statute that could be used to prosecute those who engage in so-called “group defamation.”

The first prize winner was a model statute defining group defamation as:

Any oral, written or symbolic speech, published with malice, that debases, degrades or calls into question the loyalties, abilities or integrity of members of a group based on a characteristic that [is] allegedly common to the members of that group, or that by its very utterance inflicts injury upon members of a group, or that promotes animosity against a group.

A “group” was defined as “an aggregation of people identified by a common race, religion, national origin, ethnicity or gender, or based upon heterosexuality or homosexuality.”

Under the proposed statute, an agency would be established to monitor acts of group defamation; assess the impact of any speech that defames a group; and counteract the actually and potentially adverse effects of that speech. That agency would also review all films and movies before they could be shown and, if deemed to be offensive, ban public viewing.

In a similar vein, on November 2, 1995, then-Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.)—now a powerful U.S. senator—joined with the aforementioned Congressman Conyers in promoting legislation of the character proposed at the ADL conference. The Schumer measure, H.R. 2580, was deceptively called “The Republican Form of Government Guarantee Act.”

A longtime ADL spokesman in Congress, Schumer proposed to outlaw discussion of what he called “baseless conspiracy theories regarding the government” that he said endangered public order. Already he was known as the leading congressional enemy of the Second Amendment and the rights of gun owners. Schumer’s new target—the First Amendment—would have been scrapped had the bill been passed.

A journalist specializing in media critique, Michael Collins Piper is the author of The High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, Dirty Secrets, The Judas Goats, The Golem, Target Traficant and My First Days in the White House All are available from AFP.

Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK – HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR – By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .

Sign up for our free e-newsletter here – get a free gift just for signing up!

(Issue # 26, June 29, 2009)

Send this page to a friend! (click here)

Please make a donation to American Free Press

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.