Ou comment sommes-nous arrivés à perfectionner la torture au point d’en faire une véritable science de la manipulation mentale
The Raw Story
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:49 EDT
Relevez le nom des idéologues de la torture, ce ne sont pas les enfants de Mengele mais plutôt les enfants de Moïse:
*Albert D. Biderman
Quelle ironie de l’histoire.
— Edward Bernays, the « Father of Propaganda » (and nephew of famed Jewish psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud). The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays & the Birth of PR, PR Watch, 2nd Quarter, 1999
Chaos Manipulation a Forte of Global Elite
By Victor Thorn
America’s astronomical debt is unsustainable. Will it lead to the collapse of our dollar? Or, could a swine flu pandemic cripple the nation’s healthcare system? A suitcase nuke in St. Louis would move us into a renewed state of panic. Who could calculate the effect of another false-flag “lone nut” domestic terrorist like Timothy McVeigh?
Each of these scenarios is very real because the global elite have historically used crisis to disorient and overwhelm the populace into a state of shock so that they can push through legislation that had already been penned (i.e. two successive levels of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act enacted via the OKC Bombing and 9-11).
Barack Obama’s primary thug, Rahm Emanuel, recently quipped, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” New World Order elitists most certainly savor these moments. To them, crisis equals action, whether it’s a natural disaster, an orchestrated economic collapse, war, terror, or the instability of a coup.
When these “controlled chaos” events are foisted upon the public through the media’s shock and awe wizardry, the emergency suspends animation and people are far more open to suggestion and willing to comply. As such, we’re so focused on the misery and disaster that our personal interest is exploited before we realize what’s happening.
These architects of catastrophe thrive on tragedy. To them, it’s an opportunity that’s neither benign nor bloodless. Hark back to Sept. 11, 2001. With the masses in shock, government leaders implemented new policies as a form of social reengineering. To be successful, the hidden NWO oligarchs first had to create a blitzkrieg sense of isolation where our resistance was diminished by the disorientation of falling skyscrapers and a jet purportedly hitting the Pentagon. Suddenly, after being “invaded,” we didn’t live in the world we thought we lived in. The entire collective narrative had been altered.
At this stage, in true Machiavellian fashion, the manipulators saw us as blank slates upon which they could imprint their new ideas. Picture electroshock therapy patients whose original personalities are completely distorted and/or erased, only to be replaced by “reformed” ones. The same applies to Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America.”
After the deluge (either real or perceived), a framework is already intact to pass new laws. Disaster equals profit for the elite, and this requires the need for a new enemy to emerge (and be feared). To reinforce their agenda, heavy doses of propaganda are disseminated on the public. “If you’re patriotic and love freedom, you need to defend the homeland and our war against tyranny.” Of course, opposition must be suppressed. So, if you don’t become a willing automaton in the collective whole, then your dissent is painted as unpatriotic (example: 9-11 “truthers”).
Over the past century, an Orwellian prophecy of perpetual war and perpetual enemies has plagued America. We went from hating Nazis to Communists, then Koreans and Vietnamese, to “extreme Islam” today. As our “war on terror” unfolded (a phrase coined by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu), entire war profiteering economies were built on fear via our invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
But this phenomenon shouldn’t surprise anyone. Spike event governance has always been the NWO’s modus operandi. By funding both the North and South during our Civil War, the Rothschild family came close to dividing America into two separate countries (all in their quest to create an all-powerful central bank).
In 1913, legislation creating the Federal Reserve and a federal income tax allowed America’s worst president ever—Woodrow Wilson—to lead us into World War I. Perpetual debt and interest payments to an international banking cartel were the intended result.
The 1929 stock market crash allowed elite families such as the Rockefellers, Morgans and Vanderbilts to rake in millions, while the remainder wallowed in a decade-long Great Depression. To “rescue” us, FDR conceived his socialist New Deal; then along with Winston Churchill, stood by while the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Our involvement in World War II soon followed.
To climax this destruction, atom bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a form of “urban renewal.” Japanese nationalists were eliminated, replaced by global industrialists and a new crop of slave laborers—“made in Japan.” [One hundred years earlier, these slave laborers were immigrants to America working in sweat shops, coal mines, factories, or building railroads.]
In the ensuing years as the American economy boomed (a black and white Leave it to Beaver world), our CIA ran rampant, creating mayhem via their illegal experimentation. Upon leaving office in January 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower warned of a “military-industrial complex.” Less than three years later in a coup d’etat, JFK was assassinated in Dallas. Virtually to overnight, LBJ dramatically increased aid to Israel, ratcheted up our involvement in Vietnam, and unleashed his socialist Great Society.
The disgrace of Richard Nixon’s Watergate paved the way for David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission candidate, Jimmy Carter. More importantly, his national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski (also a Trilateralist), lured the Russians into attacking Afghanistan. This spike event led to their version of Vietnam, and the USSR’s collapse. Reminiscent of 1984, the same “freedom fighters” we financed to battle our
Cold War enemy are now being financed by the Russians to fight us. Seems highly unlikely—evidence? Spike events rule the world. The fall of Berlin’s Wall in 1989 served as a conduit to the European Union’s formation in 1993. Our Iran-Contra fiasco concealed a vast network of U.S. drug trafficking (including the crack epidemic in Los Angeles). Israel’s USS Liberty attack nearly started WWIII. China’s Tiananmen Square uprising opened the door to “reform at the barrel of a gun” (to quote Mao). As a result, China emerged as the world’s new slave labor capital, for their workers are too terrified to protest or demand their rights, as we see them. Economically, stock market spike events via 1973’s oil embargo, Black Monday in 1987, and the dot.com, housing and banking bubble bursts have stripped billions from investors (while Wall Street manipulators reaped vast rewards behind the scenes). More recently, Hurricane Katrina exiled New Orleans’ poor while construction outfits like KBR profited handsomely. The same transformation took place during Sri Lanka’s tsunami where privately owned fishing villages were usurped by corporate luxury resorts.
With the World Health Organization, IMF, World Bank, CFR, and Bilderberg elite guiding these catastrophes with their hidden hand, a quote by H.L. Mencken seems appropriate. “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the people alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” Sadly, these demons become all too real, as we witnessed on 9-11. What will be the next spike event that sends society into turmoil while simultaneously creating the means to alter our world yet again?
Psy-Ops Standard Fare for U.S.
• CIA, Mossad have been dabbling in mind control for decades
• Secret U.S. documents reveal infatuation with “brainwashing”
First, there is no danger of the agent selling out. More important would be the conviction of innocence which the man himself had. . . . He would never “act guilty” and if ever accused of seeking information would be quite honestly indignant. This conviction of innocence . . . is perhaps his greatest safeguard under questioning by authorities. Finally, it would be impossible to “third degree” him and so pick up the links of a chain.
THE ENEMY WITHIN
by Michael Collins Piper
Intelligence Agency Manipulation
of the Science of Mind Control
And Exploitation of the Cult Phenomenon:
A Very Real Tactic of The Enemy Within
The subject of mind control un-nerves many people who dismiss the topic as some form of “science fiction” or “conspiracy theory.”
However, the truth is that mind control—in perhaps its simplest form—is nothing more than old-fashioned hypnosis—and there are few who deny that hypnotic states can be induced.
There are several well-written and thoroughly-researched books that have examined the history of mind control experimentation and technology.
One of the earliest known “experts” in the bizarre science of mind control was George Estabrooks, chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University who came to Washington to work for the War Department in World War II. In his book Hypnosis, Estabrooks described how important mind-control could be for use in intelligence operations. ”First,” he wrote:
There is no danger of the agent selling out. More important would be the conviction of innocence which the man himself had, and this is a great aid in many situations. He would never “act guilty” and if ever accused of seeking information would be quite honestly indignant. This conviction of innocence on the part of a criminal is perhaps his greatest safeguard under questioning by authorities. Finally, it would be impossible to ‘third degree’ him and so pick up the links of a chain.
Estabrooks said that people under mind-control can be encouraged to engage in so-called “fifth column” activities. “Through them,” he wrote, “we would hope to be kept informed of the activities of their ‘friends,’ this information, of course, being obtained in the trance state.”
Following Estabrooks’ pioneering work, it was during the 1950s that the newly-formed CIA (and its allies in Israel’s Mossad)—as well as the Soviet KGB—began heavy-duty research in this field.
Perhaps the most authoritative work examining the CIA’s activity is The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, subtitled “The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to Control Human Behavior.” First published in 1979, the book was very rare and only recently went back into print. Certainly no “extremist tract,” the book was first published by a subdivision of no less than the prestigious New York Times.The author was John Marks, best known as the co-author, with flamboyant former high-ranking CIA official Victor Marchetti, of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, the first book ever censored prior to publication by the CIA.
(Marks’ book title was a play on the title of a famous 1958 Richard Condon novel—later a popular motion picture—The Manchurian Candidate. In Condon’s horrifying scenario, an American soldier is brainwashed by the communists during the Korean War, falsely set up as a “war hero,” and later manipulated in an assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
(It turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known “anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting communism—truly The Enemy Within.The mind-control victim never knows he is being manipulated—until it is too late.)
Marks’s book was not a novel. Instead, Marks’ study was based largely on some 16,000 pages of documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act.
Several years before Marks’ book came out, the first details about the CIA’s adventures in this bizarre field reached the pages of daily newspapers in the wake of a controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA.
Until then, Americans believed that only the “Communists” and the “Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant experiments to study the process of manipulating human behavior.
In truth, the CIA had delved into mind control beginning just shortly after its creation in 1947.The CIA’s mind control project was initially known as “Bluebird” and then later expanded into “Artichoke” by 1953.
The overall code name for the operation became known as MK-ULTRA.
The impetus for the CIA’s mind-control operations came from Richard Helms who went on to head the CIA’s entire clandestine operations program, and then become CIA director. Helms’ idea was approved by then-CIA chief Allen Dulles who gave the go-ahead for the project. Chief of operations for the experiments was the chief of the agency’s technical services section (TSS), one Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, although he was under the supervision of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence and the Israeli Mossad’s devoted liaison at the CIA.
According to Marks, in June 1960 [Gottlieb’s] TSS officials launched an expanded program of operational experiments in hypnosis in cooperation with the CIA’s Counterintelligence [CI] staff:
Counterintelligence officials wrote that the hypnosis program could provide a ‘potential breakthrough in clandestine technology.’Their arrangement with TSS was that the MK-ULTRA men would develop the technique in the laboratory, while they took care of ‘field experimentation.’ The Counterintelligence program had three goals: (1) to induce hypnosis very rapidly in unwitting subjects; (2) to create durable amnesia; and (3) to implant durable and operationally useful posthypnotic suggestions.
Marks noted that the CIA’s prime locale for its mind-control experiments was Mexico City.The Mexican capital was, during the Cold War period, according to all accounts, the Western Hemisphere’s primary nest of international intelligence intrigue. It was in Mexico City where—as we’ve noted—E. Howard Hunt served as the CIA’s station chief and one of his CIA lieutenants was none other than future pundit,William F. Buckley, Jr.,who emerged as a leading figure in the effort to bend traditional American conservatism toward internationalism. Mexico City was also a major base of operations for Israel’s Mossad.
According to formerly secret CIA documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, among the “additional avenues to the control of human behavior” that Gottlieb’s operatives found appropriate to investigate were “radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances and paramilitary devices and materials.”
The New York Times reported on September 20, 1977 that “The documents show that the tests were carried out in New York City and San Francisco between 1953 and 1966, in CIA ‘safe houses,’ mainly apartments and motel rooms, that were secretly rented for the agency by an official of the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics, since supplanted by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
“Prostitutes, perhaps men as well as women, may have been employed to lure the subjects to the safe houses, where they were offered cocktails laced with various chemicals while unseen CIA officials observed, photographed and recorded their reactions.”
The CIA is also known to have conducted drug experiments with drug addicts held at a federal facility. In 1975 the CIA formally admitted that experiments were conducted at the Federal Addiction Research Center in Lexington, Kentucky, involving the administration of drugs, including hallucinogens, to prisoner volunteers.
One prisoner, James H. Childs, testified to a Senate committee of inquiry that the prisoners who participated in the CIA program were paid by the CIA in the form of addictive drugs.
Another former prisoner who testified, Edward M. Flowers, said that LSD was given to prisoners in cookies during experiments. From 1952 to 1955, he said, prisoners were allowed to take their pay for being in the programs in either drugs or time off their sentences.
One of the key figures at the CIA’s Lexington, Kentucky operation was the on-base chaplain, Rabbi Maurice Davis who, in later years, emerged as a widely-known operative of the Anti-Defamation League, the politically influential American-based intelligence and propaganda arm of Israel’s secret service, the Mossad.
Other experiments in drug-induced mind-control were conducted at the Vacaville prison facility in California. It was there, according to one witness, that Donald DeFreeze, later head of the violent terrorist group, the Symbionese Liberation Army, told another inmate that he, too, was part of the CIA’s mind-control experiments.
DeFreeze and his gang later kidnapped Patty Hearst of the Hearst publishing empire and brought her into their criminal activities. Later Miss Hearst’s attorneys said they believed she showed signs of being under the influence of drugs.
Considering all of this, it is no surprise that the CIA and the Mossad have long had a particular interest in the phenomenon of cults, which have long been in existence in virtually every culture, in one form or another. Cult members are typically very pliable and willing to do whatever their masters tell them.
And this is one reason why the CIA and the Mossad have been especially determined to gain control of cult groups at the highest levels and thereby use those cults—and their members—to advance their own agendas.
In addition, there is widespread speculation that some of the best known cults today—such as the infamous Unification Church of Sun Myung Moon, to name just one—are actually outright creations of state intelligence services. In another case, a group of Zionist lawyers, largely based in California, are known to have grabbed control, at the highest levels, behind the scenes, of another well-known “religious” organization—called a “church”by its members but often described as a “cult” by its critics—and utilized the vast financial (and membership) resources of that cult for their own purposes.
Here’s how the mind control operations of the CIA and the Mossad (utilizing cult groups) work:While these intelligence agencies actually control the cults, the lower-level cult members do not know, of course, that they are now part of a highly-sophisticated intelligence-based mindcontrol operation.
While the cult members are completely subservient to their higher-ups, subject to their discipline, the cult members, naturally, are from all walks of life and some reach high positions of influence within the companies and organizations in which they work in their day-to-day life outside the cult. However they always remain loyal because of the “brainwashing” process to which they have been subjected.
Sometimes the cult members are open about their cult membership.
Other times—for strategic reasons—they do not reveal their cult affiliation, if the cult association could hinder the “black op” underway.
Whether the cult members are employed by political groups, historical revisionist research institutes, banks, insurance companies, government agencies, or even fast-food restaurants,they will always be available for deployment when their higher-ups in the cult (operating at the behest of the CIA or the Mossad) make the decision to carry out some particular intelligence operation.
For example: suppose a member of a Mossad-controlled cult is employed by a maverick, dissident political group which is considered dangerous to the Establishment. If the Mossad wishes to undermine that organization, it will utilize its control of the cult to manipulate that individual to work to wreck the organization from within.
Liberty Lobby, the populist institution that published The Spotlight until Liberty Lobby was driven into bankruptcy and destroyed by a corrupt federal judge in 2001, had its own unpleasant experiences with the operatives of one cult.
Over a period of many years, admitted, overt operatives of the cult made friendly contact with Liberty Lobby.
The cult members supplied Liberty Lobby with hard-hitting and factual information about corrupt activities within the federal government.
Behind-the-scenes, however, the cultists were working to disrupt the work of Liberty Lobby on other fronts.
A cult member (Matthew Peter Balic)—who did not reveal his membership in the cult—frequently attended Liberty Lobby meetings, visited Liberty Lobby headquarters, and socialized with Liberty Lobby employees, gaining their confidence.
(This was the same modus operandi of the infamous Roy Edward Bullock, now exposed as a long-time operative of the CIA-allied, Israeli Mossad-controlled Anti-Defamation League.)
After some time, however, it became apparent that Balic, ostensibly a friend of Liberty Lobby, was, in fact, trying to undermine the populist institution and its weekly newspaper in a wide variety of ways. It was not until later that Liberty Lobby’s suspicions were confirmed and Balic’s affiliation with the cult was exposed.
Liberty Lobby learned that Balic was a former alcoholic who joined the cult and then reformed. In the process, however, Balic became subject to the cult’s discipline (and its controllers) and emerged as one of the cult’s key national intelligence operatives, in this case deployed against Liberty Lobby.
It was precisely at the time that Liberty Lobby learned that Balic was a cult operative that the previously-friendly other members of the cult (who had openly acknowledged their affiliation) abruptly broke off all contact with Liberty Lobby.
Later, the cult played a special role in a broad-ranging conspiracy that resulted in the destruction of Liberty Lobby.
But the role of cults in the world of intelligence intrigue is something that few understand or know about.
In another case, it was revealed that a Justice Department special task force was investigating charges that a notorious cult known as “the Finders”was used by the CIA as a front group during the 1980’s.
What makes the intelligence agency’s reported link to this particular cult especially troubling is that the Finders have been accused of engaging in Satanic rituals, child abuse and pornography. Federal authorities were also trying to determine whether the CIA impeded state and local investigations of child abuse within the cult in order to protect its own intelligence operations.
The CIA, never known to own up to its own misdeeds, responded to the charges by saying, “Most days we expect our share of unusual questions, but his one is clear off the wall. Any claim that we obstructed justice in this case is nuts.”
A CIA spokesman, David Christian, admitted, however, that it had sent some of its agents to a company called Future Enterprises, Inc. for computer training. However, according to Christian, the nation’s crack intelligence agency did not know about connections between the computer company and the Finders cult.
Christian claimed that the company “was in no sense a CIA front or ever owned or operated by anyone for the CIA.”
However, the president of Future Enterprises, Joseph Marinich, admitted that his company was under contract to the CIA for computer training. Marinich admitted, further, that his tax accountant, R. Gardner Terrell,was a Finders member.
Finders cult members claimed that Terrell’s work for Future Enterprises had nothing to do with his membership in the cult.
Finally, an April 13, 1987 report by a Customs Service Agent who was investigating the Finders cult said that the CIA “admitted to owning the Finders organization as a front for a domestic computer training operation but that it had ‘gone bad.’”
(In other words, the CIA had been using the Finders as a front, but that the cult members had become engaged in activities beyond the control of the CIA and, as such, had “gone bad.’)
Clearly, the use of “mind control” in general, as well as the secret control and manipulation of cults, by the CIA and the Mossad and myriad other evil-doers has a very real (and ugly) history that many people are too eager to discredit as “science fiction” or “conspiracy theories.”
Mind control is a fact.
It is another mechanism used by The Enemy Within to wage war against political dissidents in America.The next time you hear someone claim that he has an “implant,” put in his head by the CIA, don’t dismiss what he’s saying out of hand. For it may very well be true.
How many “lone assassins,”“lone bombers,”“right-wing racist gunmen,” and other such poster boys for the media monopoly in America to exploit have been subjected to some form of mind control is a question that may never be answered, but the bottom line is this:
Mind control is for real.
Les Directives Prioritaires
The Globalist Manifesto
Le contrôle des médias selon les Protocoles des Pathocrates
Ces vieux cons avaient raison!
Petite leçon d’ingénierie sociale
Ron Paul: « ils oeuvrent à établir un gouvernement mondial »
Pour voir le futur, regardez ce que vivent les Palestiniens
Les drones israéliens: admirez le futur
Cela doit rester ainsi