L’ère messianique reaganienne

And we must make sure that when the tall towers of our greatest cities have crumbled to dust in the turnings of time, the Jewish people will still be on this earth to cast their blessings
Traduction: « Et nous devons nous assurer que quand les hautes tours de nos plus grandes villes seront réduites en poussières dans les méandres du temps,le peuple Juif soit encore sur cette terre pour distribuer ses bénédictions. »

Citation de la chèvre de Judas et façade des Néocons Ronald Wilson Reagan (1988)

VIDEO – Hollywoodism : aliens transformed the values of the USA


Reagan Hollywood and the mob

Le grand bluff de Ronald Reagan

MCA, the Mafia and Ronald Reagan

The Last Mogul: The Life and Times of Lew Wasserman (trailer, 2005)

Jewish Extremism and Its Media Cover Up by Representative Dr. David E. Duke, Ph.D.

Revisionist History–Michael A. Hoffman

Witches and Rabbis: Legacy of the Reagan White House
Witches and Rabbis: Legacy of the Reagan White House Counters an ocean of revolting hype about Reagan, emanating from schizophrenic « Conservatives » who have been leading Americans from one disaster to another with their double-minded insanity. Here is the dossier that shatters the Reagan myth and declares the truth about the « Great Betrayer. » Contents: Reagan’s Kosher Cash Cow; Greatest Presidential Friend of the Israelis; Patron Saint of the Holohoax Lobby; Reagan the Liar; The Witch of the White House; Reagan: Sponsor of Martin Luther King; Reagan, Bankers & the U.S. as Cheap Labor Colony; Menachem Schneerson: Reagan’s False Messiah; Saddam’s Ally–Reagan; The “Commie Fighter” who worked for the Commies. Pamphlet, illustrated, 16 pages.
$ 5.00


Hoffman II Michael A. – Witches and rabbis

Author : Hoffman II Michael A.
Title : Witches and rabbis The legacy of the Reagan White House The Reagan Myth Exposed
Year : 2004

by Michael A. Hoffman II

Copyright 2004 by revisionisthistory.org
All Rights Reserved

Ding dong the Antichrist is dead; Mr. 666 himself (R-o-n-a-l-d W-i-l-s-o-n R-e-a-g-a-n), whose California retirement residence was numbered 666 before Nancy, the Hollywood floozie he chose over his lawful first wife Jane Wyman, had the number changed.

Hoffman, how dare you impugn the reputation of the statesman Peggy Noonan has rightfully dubbed, « the King of Character »! Ronald Reagan was a hero of our Western Civilization!

Well, what passes for « our » Western Civilization these days is a vertiginous carnival funhouse, and the panegyric for Bonzo, from looney « conservatives, » is a symptom of the Double Mind mentality that is epidemic in this, the terminal phase of « our » Western Syphilization. Let the record speak for itself:


1. Reagan was named « the greatest friend in the White House that Israel ever had » by the arch Stern gang terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir. The memorandum of understanding which he reached with Shamir is cited in our time as a basis for George W. Bush’s « more Likudnik than thou » foreign policy disasters in the Middle East, which have generated, not stemmed, terrorism and untold suffering.


2. The schedule of the « pro-Christian » Reagan White House was set by a San Francisco witch, Joan Quigley, whose « psychic powers » were obsessively consulted by both the President and the First Lady. For instance, « Reagan wished in early December 1983 to announce that he would be seeking reelection, but Quigley judged the timing to be terrible. She forced the announcement to wait until January 29, a move that frustrated Reagan. What’s more, she had him deliver the speech at 10:55 p.m., a late hour that had political commentators scratching their heads. »

In another case, Reagan met with Mikhail Gorbachev for a document signing in Helsinki just after dawn, leaving everyone but soothsayer Joan and her familiar Nancy, shaking their heads in befuddlement, (the weird timing had been set by Quigley).

It has even been said that in times of national crisis, Reagan would frantically ask Nancy, « What does Joan say? » (The full impact of Quigley’s counsel on Reagan’s foreign and domestic policies has yet to be revealed).

Sources: Former White House Chief of Staff Donald Regan’s 1988 book, « For the Record; » see also http://www.parascope.com/articles/0497/reagan02.htm


3. Reagan’s closest religious crony was not a priest or pastor, but Menachem Mendel Schneerson, Grand Rabbi of the Chabad-Lubavitch wing of Orthodox Judaism: « Chabad’s closest presidential relationship, (Avraham) Shemtov says, was with Ronald Reagan, who corresponded personally with Schneerson…Chabad delegations were both the first visitors to the White House when Reagan was elected and his last vistors on his final day in office. »

The founder of Chabad-Lubavitch was Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Lyady, whose somewhat uncharitable doctrine that all gentiles are « completely evil, » sub-human garbage (« supernal refuse »), who possess « no redeeming characteristics, » is still imparted to students in Chabad-Lubavitch schools (many of these children are named « Zalman » in his honor).

In his old age, Rabbi Schneerson, did nothing to discourage the delusion that he was the Messiah. Even after Schneerson’s death in 1994, many of his followers continue to claim that either he will rise from the dead or that he is in fact, still alive: « We believe that he is alive and well, and has only `disappeared’ temporarily, and that he will reveal himself at any moment. » –Rabbi Zimroni Tzik.

According to Prof. David Berger, a lecturer in Jewish studies at Brooklyn College and at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, « the messianists are no longer satisfied with identifying the rebbe (Schneerson) as the Messiah, but identify him as God himself. »

By proclamation, in 1983, President Reagan established the birthday of this false messiah and « god », Schneerson, (March 28), as « Education Day USA » (it has been observed on various days in the spring, including March 26, April 2 and once on Hitler’s birthday, April 20; see http://www.cephas-library.com/nwo/nwo_proclamation_5463_education_day_usa.html).

The ominous law which grew out of Reagan’s repeated proclamations in Schneerson’s name, Public Law 102-14, establishes a statutory obligation on Americans to obey the Talmudic interpretation of the « Noahide Laws » (a counterfeit name, since rabbinic tradition disparages Noah), which stipulate the death penalty for « avoda zara » (idol worship), of which, according to the halachic authority Maimonides, all who worship Jesus Christ, are guilty. So we have, thanks to Mr. Reagan, a law on the Federal statute books, which can be invoked at any time to establish legal grounds for executing those who worship Jesus as the second person of the Holy Trinity.

While Jimmy Carter was the first American president to officially flirt with Chabad-Lubavitch Judaism, it was Reagan who massively collaborated with them, formally creating the legal grounds for the subsequent 1991 Public Law 102-14, with his Proclamations 5317 and 5463. All subsequent presidents have reconfirmed Reagan’s proclamations, and the former Press Secretary who gave George W. Bush his hypnotic cues from the audience (watch the videotape), during Bush’s Purim 2003 « we’re going to war in Iraq » news conference, was the Chabad-Lubavitch agent, Ari Fleischer.

Messiah Schneerson’s cult continues to command influence and remains incumbent on all top government officials, whether of the Right or the Left. For instance, Rabbi Schneerson is slated to be adored next week (June 17, 2004) in a civic ceremony at the prestigious John F. Kennedy Library in Massachusetts. Hundreds are expected to gather for this Judaic seance, billed as « One People, One Soul. » Co-sponsored by 22 Chabad Centers from greater Boston, it will feature a keynote address by Talmud expert Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz of Jerusalem, and will be graced by top US lawmakers and federal officials and who knows — perhaps even an appearance by the late rabbi himself!

Sources: Sue Fishkoff, « The Rebbe’s Army » (NY: Schocken Books, 2003), pp. 192-193; Yair Sheleg, « Waiting for a Revelation, » Haaretz (Israeli newspaper), May 26, 2004; and http://web.archive.org/web/20050705081623/http://www.ukar.org/gore10.html


4. On November 3, 1983, Reagan signed the law establishing the third Monday of every January as the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Holiday. This law has nothing to do with the advancement of the civil rights of black people, who were saddled with a paralyzing welfare entitlement mentality commensurate with the rise of King, and who had been far better served by the empowering self-reliance creed of the now largely forgotten black educator, Booker T. Washington.

Reagan knew fully well, as he affirmed to New Hampshire Governor Meldrim Thompson, that Martin Luther King was a serial adulterer, plagiarist (having cheated on his PhD. dissertation at Boston College) and Communist party affiliate. « I have the reservations you have, » Reaganwrote Thompson, « but here the perception of too many people is based on an image, not reality. »

With a monumental shrug of his broad shoulders, Reagan consciously and knowingly committed one of the most treacherous acts of compromise of any president in our nation’s history, signing into law the King holiday. By so doing, Mr. Reagan sentenced American children in public schools across the land to an immersion every January in King’s crippling philosophy of entitlement, with its undercurrent of contempt for poor whites, whose ancestors were themselves slaves in 17th and 18th century America (not just « indentured servants »).

With the exception of Abraham Lincoln, no American is studied in our public schools with the fervor and to the extent accorded Martin Luther King, not even our nation’s founder, George Washington, who has been reduced mostly to serving as an icon of February clearance sales in advertisements for used cars and furniture.

King dedicated himself to overthrowing our immemorial rights to free association (i.e. the right to choose your employees and the customers you will serve in your business), and the right of private property (the right to decide to whom you will sell or rent your property). He succeeded when these rights were derogated by the misnamed Civil Rights Act of 1964. Imposing, by Federal fiat, a national holiday honoring King, serves to institutionalize the moral, ethical and legal rectitude of the assault on these rights.

Due to King and his enabler Reagan, we have raised a generation of American judges, legislators and students with no grasp of the necessity of these vital rights, and no memory of their hallowed, thousand year legacy. Instead, we now have millions of Americans too terrified of Federal enforcement agents to dare to hire or rent to those whom they most desire to employ or house. This represents a grievous abridgment of the civil rights of all Americans.


5. After his reelection in 1984, Reagan began to press for the acquisition of a vast pool of coolie labor on behalf of his corporate patrons, due to the fact that most native-born Americans in that era insisted on a living wage, according to the ancient standard of the Church (I Timothy 5:18).

In order to lay the groundwork for the transformation of yeoman America into a cheap labor colony, Reagan championed a controversial amnesty scheme for millions of illegal aliens, most of whom were Mexican nationals. In 1986, Reagan triumphed, signing into law the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, granting the amnesty which almost immediately led to an unprecedented immigration invasion which has not abated to this day, and which in turn created vast financial burdens on California’s medical insurance program; and the inflation of housing costs to unbearable levels, (causing many native-born Americans to be unable to afford a home in California). The American southwest has subsequently been transformed into a crime-ridden outpost of a resurgent « Aztlan. »

President George W. Bush has proposed another calamitous, Reagan-style amnesty for illegal aliens on the same grounds and for the benefit of the same Antichrist, predatory capitalist interests.


6. Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy supported and maintained in power many of the protagonists in the Muslim and Arab world who have lately been branded as planetary threats to world peace, including Saddam Hussein, Reagan’s ally in the Iraqi-precipitated Iran-Iraq war, and Usama bin Laden, who was armed and funded by Reagan’s CIA in Afghanistan.

Reagan is alleged to be a redoubtable « Commie fighter. » This risible PR spin overlooks the historic role the US government has played in ensuring the survival and expansion of the Communist slave system (in Russia by Henry Ford and Franklin D. Roosevelt; in Eastern Europe by Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman, and in China by George C. Marshall and Richard M. Nixon).

Communism only becomes vulnerable to destabilization by the US when it exhibits two defects: falling out of favor with the International Trade Cartel (Cuba) or falling out of favor with International Zionism (the USSR). Both Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson in the late 1960s and RepublicanNixon in the early 1970s did ample business with the Soviet Union in ways that significantly bolstered the Soviet system.

It was only after a clear consensus emerged in New York, London and Jerusalem that the Judaics were scheduled to at long last terminate their world-historic Communist operations in Russia, and transform themselves into « victims of Communism, » that Reagan was given the greenlight to play liberator.

Yet at the same time our hero was acting this part, his Office of Special Investigations (OSI), a Federal agency which functions as an enforcement arm of international Zionism, was kidnapping elderly anti-Communist Christians and shamefully and disgracefully handing them over to the Communist butchers they had once fought.

Most notorious in this regard was the Reagan administration’s monstrous betrayal of the Catholic Croatian statesman Andrija Artukovic, an octogenarian who was keelhauled on a hospital gurney back to Communist Yugolslavia in 1986, to the hideous glee of vengeful Judeo-Communists.

It is patent that on those occasions when his Judaic handlers sought to have him assist vicious Communist persecution, Reagan timidly obeyed his orders and collaborated; and in those geo-political situations, such as in Russia, where, after 70 years on the road to nowhere, the Russian nation had been raped and drained to the point of collapse, and it was time for the Holy People to head for greener pastures in Brooklyn, Beverly Hills and Tel Aviv, that Reagan was allowed to step in, on cue, and assume the mantle of « Liberator of The Evil Empire. »


Amid the sawdust of the American funhouse carnival, in the double-mind of the split-personalities who people that funhouse, Ronald Wilson Reagan is a paradigm of « the good and the true » in a « world of venal compromise. »

This hypnotic belief is similar to the mesmeric conviction that our current President can be a Skull and Bones secret society member and a good Christian; a papally-certified Right-to-Life campaigner and the man who was instrumental in helping abortionist Alan Specter defeat the staunch anti-abortionist, Congressman Patrick Toomey, in the Republican primary battle for the US Senate in Pennsylvania.

It all makes sense, under the ensign of the grinning clown, in the funhouse chamber of thrills, chills and spills; in the words of the barker’s spiel, « A hero, a giant, a knight, a prince, the king of character! »

But when the klieg lights have all gone dark and the sawdust has been scattered on the wind, it is the rabbis and the witches who will write the final epitaph of the Reagan legacy, « Solve et coagula. »

The Victory of ‘Perception Management’ Special Report: In the 1980s, the Reagan administration pioneered “perception management” to get the American people to “kick the Vietnam Syndrome” and accept more U.S. interventionism, but that propaganda structure continues to this day getting the public to buy into endless war, writes Robert Parry.

2015 : Une année charnière pour des crises économiques et financières et des guerres ? Rodrigue Tremblay
De nos jours, des néoconservateurs (‘‘Neocons’) militaristes exercent un contrôle quasi complet sur le gouvernement américain derrière la façade de quiconque est le président en poste. En effet, on les retrouve derrière les politiques du Département d’État, du Pentagone, du Trésor américain et de la banque centrale américaine. Ils sont ainsi en mesure d’influencer et de dicter la politique étrangère, la politique militaire, les politiques économiques et financières et la politique monétaire des États-Unis.   Ce n’était guère le cas avant l’arrivée au pouvoir du gouvernement de Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) alors que celui-ci adopta une « politique étrangère dite musclée » d’inspiration neocon, laquelle reposait sur l’interventionnisme militaire américain à l’étranger, la guerre perpétuelle, les renversements arbitraires de gouvernements étrangers, et une gouvernance mondiale impériale exercée par les États Unis sur tout enjeu impliquant des intérêts américains et ceux de leurs alliés les plus proches.

Rabbi Cohen Opens CA Senate Session

Rabbi Shea Harlig at House of Representatives

Rabbi Goodman Opening Prayer in US House of Representatives


Discours messianiques

Cette connivence entre les sphères politique et religieuse n’est pas du goût de tout le monde, surtout quand elle semble engager la sécurité de l’État hébreu et de ses citoyens. « Je n’ai pas confiance dans une direction qui prend des décisions fondées sur des sentiments messianiques », s’était agacé Yuval Diskin en avril dernier. À l’instar de cet ancien patron du Shin Bet – les services de contre-espionnage -, plusieurs ténors de l’appareil sécuritaire récusent l’alarmisme de Netanyahou et de son ministre de la Défense, Ehoud Barak, à propos de la « menace » nucléaire iranienne. Tous deux partisans de la manière forte pour l’éradiquer, ils sont accusés de vouloir précipiter le pays dans une guerre aux conséquences dévastatrices.

Dieu interviendra pour sauver le « peuple élu » froudroyant au passage ses ennemis

Car derrière un sentiment de responsabilité morale à l’égard du destin du peuple juif – que ses détracteurs croient sincère -, l’actuel chef du gouvernement israélien ne serait pas insensible à certains courants rabbiniques. Celui de Menachem Mendel Schneerson, par exemple, défunt leader du mouvement Loubavitch, que Netanyahou avait cité lors d’une allocution à l’ONU en septembre 2011. Ses adeptes, dont ferait partie le Premier ministre, estiment que ce rabbin n’est autre que le Messie et qu’il vivrait toujours au milieu des hommes.
Un an plus tôt, dans un discours marquant la commémoration de la libération du camp d’Auschwitz, Netanyahou avait annoncé que la prophétie du chapitre 37 d’Ézéchiel, « Les ossements desséchés », était accomplie. Selon cette vision eschatologique, les prophéties des chapitres 38 et 39 seraient donc sur le point de se réaliser. Israël s’engagera dans une immense bataille, « Gog et Magog », où il essuiera de très lourdes pertes, mais à l’issue de laquelle Dieu interviendra pour sauver le « peuple élu », foudroyant au passage ses ennemis.
Guerre imminente
Dans un pays où la spiritualité guide le quotidien et les aspirations d’une partie non négligeable de la population, cette rhétorique messianique est loin d’être marginale. Sur internet, des dizaines de vidéos annonciatrices de la fin des temps apparaissent chaque jour. Des rabbins y décryptent les codes secrets de la Bible, présentant Mahmoud Ahmadinejad comme la réincarnation d’Aman, ce vizir perse qui, jadis, avait planifié la destruction des Juifs. La guerre contre l’Iran y est même annoncée pour le mois d’eloul 5772, ce qui, d’après le calendrier hébraïque, correspondrait… à septembre 2012.
Alors que certaines fuites dans la presse suggèrent une attaque israélienne à l’automne, juste avant l’élection présidentielle américaine, des sages appellent déjà les Juifs à la rédemption. « Nous savons des choses que vous ignorez. Ni les abris ni les systèmes antimissiles de Tsahal ne pourront vous sauver », assure l’influent rabbin Amnon Itshak Chlita, qui prédit un déluge de feu contre les villes israéliennes. « Retournez à la foi, priez, respectez le repos du sabbat, et l’Éternel vous offrira sa protection. »




In the pages which follow will be found a wide-ranging variety of quotations taken verbatim from an equally wide variety of sources, almost all of whom are Jewish writers, researchers, reporters and academics. In the handful of instances in which these quotations are not from Jewish sources, per se, the materials are nonetheless from what might loosely be described as “pro-Jewish” or “pro-Zionist” sources. None of the sources can be described as “anti-Semitic” in any way, shape or form—not even by the august Anti-Defamation League!
The quotations are all clearly cited with footnotes [in this section we have integrated footnotes into the text in square brackets using italics at the end of each citation for clarity] and are direct and unabbreviated, unless clearly noted by ellipses. The [section captions] appearing before each quotation are summary words selected by this author/editor for descriptive purposes and for subdividing the diverse areas of Jewish and Zionist power and influence that are being discussed. Please note that these [captions] are not part of the actual quotation itself and should not be cited as such by researchers and writers who use this volume as a reference work.
We believe that this assembly of quotations is the most hard-hitting and informative conglomeration of such material—taken from recently published works—that has ever been assembled in the modern era and, beyond any question, the most concise and complete overview of the wealth and power of Those Who Reign Supreme in The New Jerusalem.
There is to be found a great deal of material on this subject matter if one looks in the right places, but in the pages of this work you will find it all tightly bound together in one place, a handy reference for those who dare to delve into one of the most controversial subjects of our time: Zionist power in America.
And so we begin . . .
The first area in which Jews become important in the Republican regime of the 1980s was economic policy. Although Jews play a major role in the liberal political camp, during the 1980s a small group of Jewish bankers and financiers become important allies of the Reagan administration and key agents in its economic and fiscal programs. Jews presided over the great expansion of liquidity—money and credit—that fueled the economic boom and expansion of equity values of the Reagan era. The Reagan administration had come into office praising the virtues of free market competition and unfettered capitalism and promising to restore national prosperity by lowering taxes, reducing government interference in the economy, and curbing burdensome government regulation of business. Jewish financiers played a critical role in helping the administration to fulfill its pledges. In turn, the administration, for a time, protected these financiers from attack by their corporate and political foes. [Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, p. 189]
In implementing its policies, the [Reagan] administration found itself in a de facto alliance with a small, but powerful, group of Jewish bankers and financiers. This group of individuals created or perfected the new financial instruments that, taken together, served the administration’s interests by expanding the supply of credit during the 1980s that, in turn, fueled the great bull market of that era.
For example, Jewish financiers and traders perfected the stock index futures that greatly increased liquidity in the financial system by allowing for highly leveraged securities transactions. … Such Jewish financiers as Saul Steinberg, Victor Posner, Carl Icahn, Nelson Pelz, the Belzberg family, Sir James Goldsmith, and others were among the leaders in hostile takeover efforts.
Of the major actors in the area of corporate takeovers, only two—T. Boone Pickens and Cincinnati-based Carl Lindner—were not Jews. Jewish arbitrageurs—Ivan Boesky came to be the most famous—became major factors in the acquisition of huge blocks of stock, easing the way for takeover attempts.
Jews pioneered program trading that, among other things, permitted corporations to generate excess revenues in their pension funds that could then be employed for other corporate purposes.
During the 1980s, the Reagan administration and the Jewish financiers enjoyed a perfect marriage of convenience. The administration was concerned with promoting economic growth and enhancing prosperity among its upscale constituents, even if this came at the expense of blue-collar workers and corporate managers whose firms were absorbed or simply put out of business.
For their part, the Jewish financiers saw an unprecedented opportunity to acquire wealth and power with the blessing and protection of the federal government. [Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, p. 192]
As outsiders, on the margins of the banking and securities industries, Jews were better able to see and make use of the new opportunities made available by the financial deregulation and permissive climate of the Reagan era. Whereas traditional investment bankers would offer advice and financial assistance to clients involved in mergers and acquisitions, the Jewish upstarts were willing to participate in such acquisitions themselves. The parvenu Jews saw the incredible possibilities inherent in the junk bonds that established firms disdained. The Jews honed the art of risk arbitrage, another field snubbed by WASP Wall Street. Jewish newcomers and a few of their non-Jewish allies saw the possibility of using junk bonds to finance hostile takeover attempts.
In their endeavors, the Jewish financiers enjoyed the blessing and protection of the Reagan administration. The administration courted the financiers and protected them from a hostile Congress. [Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, p. 193]
The activities of the Jewish financiers, of course, particularly their involvement in the wave of corporate takeovers that took place between 1985 and 1986 when nearly one-fourth of the corporations that had been listed in the Fortune 500 disappeared, provoked intense criticism from a number of quarters.
Many of Reagan’s opponents in the Democratic Party and the liberal media understood that it was the de facto alliance between the administration and the Jewish financiers that made sufficient money and credit available to fuel economic expansion despite the huge budget deficits that would otherwise have diminished the availability of capital to private concerns. … It apparently did not go unnoticed in executive suites across the country that virtually all the takeover specialists and their financial backers were Jews. [Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, pp. 194-197]
Syrian Jews, who have clustered in Brooklyn, New York, have also emerged as major force in the sportswear industry, particularly blue jeans lines such as Jordache and Gitano. In many ways, these newcomers constitute, if anything, a throwback to an even earlier tradition of transnational Jewish businessmen. Products of a community under constant siege, they travel the world like Bedouins on jets, with few loyalties beyond their immediate family operations. [Joel Kotkin, Tribes, p. 51]
… [T]he Jewish community in both Greater Los Angeles and California, which more than doubled during the 1970s and 1980s, continues to grow in power and size, attracting Jews from other parts of the United States, as well as [Jews from Iran, Israel and Russa]. By 1990 the Jewish population in Los Angeles—which in 1920 had fewer Jewish residents than Buffalo, New York—had expanded by over 150,000 to some 600,000, making it the second largest center for the Diaspora [Jewish world outside Israel] after New York. [Joel Kotkin, Tribes, p. 61]
Although not in control of the media and the arts, as some anti-Semites suggest, Jews clearly possess a disproportionate influence in movies, publishing, advertising and theater. In the media, according to one survey in the 1970s, one quarter of the leading figures were Jewish, more than ten times their percentage in the general population. [Joel Kotkin, Tribes, p. 61]
Jewish power in Hollywood no longer centers on those who own the studios but on the assorted agents, independent producers and writers who increasingly dominate the industry, including promoters such as Arnon Milchan, Michael Ovitz and David Geffen, a former [talent] agent and record producer whom Forbes in 1990 identified as “the richest man in Hollywood”. Traditional Jewish skills in selling, marketing, assembling the various “elements” needed for mounting a production remain critical. … Margo Bernay, a craft union business agent whose family first started commuting to Hollywood from the old Jewish neighborhoods of East Los Angeles in the 1930s, observes: “If you look at the real power in this town it’s the agents, the producers; it’s not with the studios. In the old days the studios owned the talent; now the talent owns the studios. So that’s where the Jews are, where the creativity is, the talent, the glamour, the power. It’s the sechel [reason] side of the business, the mentality. It’s the part of the business that doesn’t have boundaries that you get in big corporations—it gives you the space Jews have been brought up to push for.” [Joel Kotkin, Tribes, pp. 61-62] (…)
.American Free Press
Volume VI..#44 October 30, 2006.americanfreepress.net
P. 15, AMERICAN FREE PRESS * October 30, 2006 Behind the Scenes with Michael Collins Piper
By Michael Collins Piper
. . .Forget everything you think you know about the Mafia as it’s been commemorated in such Hollywood extravaganzas
as the famous Godfather trilogy. That’s all Tinseltown legend — some might even say “propaganda.” The truth about the organized crime syndicate in America goes much higher and deeper and in directions the mass media is not likely to ever tell you about. And if you have any doubts about it, you need to read the fascinating new book, Supermob, by veteran investigative journalist Gus Russo, who may well have put his career on the line by daring to write this stunning overview of a seamy history you’re not supposed to know about.
. . .Did you know that Ronald Reagan owed his early career in the entertainment industry and later his political career in California to a group of gangsters (many of them of Russian Jewish — not Italian-American — origin) who started out in Chicago and in other Midwestern cities such as Cleveland and Detroit? Well, that’s a fact, and in Supermob, Russo tells the story as it’s only been hinted at before.
. . .This group of gangsters and their associates, including union officials, attorneys, real estate developers, construction tycoons, hotel kings and military contractors — among other wheeler-dealers — played a major role (open and not-so-open) in the development of the casino industry in Las Vegas and in the rise of the motion picture industry as we know it today. Russo tells the story. You’ll be amazed by the wide-ranging connections of this sordid group that’s been called “The Kosher Nostra” (not to be confused with “Cosa Nostra”).
. . .Did you know that during World War II — and in the years that followed — this tightly-knit clique utilized its contacts in the federal Office of Alien Property to grab control of vast amounts of real estate and other assets that previously belonged to Japanese-Americans who were taken into custody by the Franklin Roosevelt administration and put in concentration camps on American soil? At the end of the war, one of the Supermob’s “inside” men — later a “respected” federal judge — was responsible for steering this confiscated property — now worth literally billions of dollars — into this hands of this crime-connected network.
. . .Once you’ve read Russo’s account of what happened to the Japanese-Americans, you’ll find it difficult to continue listening to the complaints about the confiscated properties of Jewish people in Europe (many of whom are living in Israel today) without recalling Russo’s expose of how Jewish-American gangsters and their associates (many of whom emerged as key supporters of the Israeli lobby in the United States) managed to amass billions of dollars in confiscated Japanese-American property.
. . .Russo’s book, which is subtitled “How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers,” hinges on the life and crimes of Chicago mob lawyer Sidney Korshak. However, it’s a story that’s much bigger than one man. Korshak relocated to California and became a top-of-the-line mover and shaker in the motion picture world, socializing with the Hollywood elite (including Ronald and Nancy Reagan) and acting as a proverbial “fixer” whose powerful reach stretched deeply into the organized crime milieu in which he operated, branching out into the complex and inter-connected worlds of finance and industry with organized crime always lurking in the background.
. . .And as Russo points out, the deeds of Korshak and company resulted in repercussions that “were felt by practically every American of their era,” not the least of which was the rise of Ronald Reagan to the presidency, setting the stage for much of the intrigue across the planet today.
. . .While in the realm of organized crime, Italian-American names were plastered across newspaper headlines and in filmland, the truth is, as Russo makes clear, this Supermob — this small handful of Jewish figures of Russian origin — “often pulled the strings of the visible power brokers” and yet, ironically, “most Americans never heard of any of them.”
. . .Now, Russo’s book sets the historical record straight in a trailblazing work that will leave you reeling. Russo writes:
. . . “Through deniable, often arm’s-length associations with the roughneck Italian and Irish mobsters imprinted in the popular imagination, the Supermob and the hoods shared a sense of entitlement regarding tax-free income.
. . . “This ‘Kosher Nostra’ stressed brains over brawn and evolved into a real estate powerhouse, an organized-labor autocracy and a media empire. If power does, indeed, corrupt, then the Supermob corrupted absolutely.
. . . “Through methodically nurtured political ties, the Supermob effectively insulated itself from prosecution. They were above the law . . . They propelled the making of the movies we watched, the music we listened to, the politicians we voted for, and the hotels and resorts we frequented. . . .”
. . .Supermob (hardback, #1516, $38.95—just $34.95 for members of the AMERICAN FREE PRESS READERSHIP COUNCIL) by Gus Russo is must reading. It is available after Nov. 2nd from First Amendment Books, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Call 1-888-699- NEWS (6397) toll free to charge to Visa or MasterCard.
. . ..A journalist specializing in media critique, Michael Collins Piper is the author of Final Judgment, the controversial “underground bestseller” documenting the collaboration of Israeli intelligence in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also the author of The High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, The Judas Goats, and Dirty Secrets, all available from FIRST AMENDMENT BOOKS and America First Books. He has lectured on suppressed topics in places as diverse as Malaysia, Japan, Canada, Russia and Abu Dhabi.

Tue., October 3, 2006: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )

[Notes from RBN site:] On the October 3 broadcast of his nightly call-in talk forum on the Republic Broadcasting Network (at rbnlive.com), Michael Collins Piper played host to his friend of some 25 years, famed American populist and nationalist author and intellectual Eustace Mullins. Mr. Mullins is, of course, the author of multiple books, ranging from MURDER BY INJECTION, a shocking account of the role of the big money controlled drug company monpolies and their infliction of dangerous drugs upon Americans that actually harm—rather than help—people, to his most famous and perhaps definitive work, THE SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, an expose of the Rothschild family-dominated international money monopoly, based in the Federal Reserve System in the United States which is anything but « federal » and which is, in fact, a privately owned money monpoly. Mullins’ work on the Federal Reserve is so influential and so widely read that there are more than one million copies in circulation both here in the United States and around the globe. During the free-wheeling discussion, Mullins discussed the attempt by former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover to silence (and destroy) Mullins through the use of covert means. Mullins also reflected on his longtime friendship with famed poet Ezra Pound who was illegally detained in a mental institution in Washington, DC for many years on trumped-up suspicion of « treason » for having dared to criticize the war policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It was Pound who first directed Mullins into research into the Federal Reserve racket and things have never been the same since. There is hardly anything of serious consequence written on the subject of the Federal Reserve today that does not owe its debt to the original research by Mullins, acting under the advice and direction of his friend Pound. Piper and Mullins also reflected on the life and work of their late mutual friend, DeWest Hooker, an outspoken critic of Zionism, who, along with Mullins, befriended famed anti-Zionist Jewish-born businessman Benjamin Freedman. Although modern-day critics of Zionism have recently discovered Freedman, Mullins and Hooker were working closely with him in the 1950s and it was Piper’s longtime employer, Willis Carto (a friend of Mullins, Hooker and Freedman), who sponsored numerous speeches by Freedman including one particularly famous speech that Freedman delivered at the Willard Hotel in Washington, DC. Piper noted that Mullins and Hooker, in the 1950s, had discovered that the so-called « anti-communist » movement was being manipulated by Trotskyite and Zionist elements that surrounded and ultimately destroyed a sincere anti-communist, Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy, after McCarthy dared to give a speech in Chicago (written by Mullins) that pointed toward the role of the international banks in promoting the globalist agenda through their support for communism. Mullins noted that, eventually, during the years of the « conservative » revolution of Ronald Reagan, the Trotskyite elements emerged as the insiders and leaders of the « conservative » —now called « neo-conservative » — elements that took over the Reagan administration and the Republican Party leadership. For more information on the work of Eustace Mullins, you may check out the special new Internet site: eustacemullins.blogspot.com




By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News (SM)
Please Help Support This Site! (Many Expenses)

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443.
Email: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Source: How Israel Eavesdrops On US Citizens Here
For The Best Post Election Coverage CLICK: Rense.com Here

THE MOSSAD PRIDES ITSELF ON DEEP infiltration & penetration into every ‘Muslim’ militant group in the world. Thus any media-hyped ‘terrorist’ attack reported by the Jewish occupied press is doubtless a Mossad operation.

All of the Mossad-engineered ‘terrorist’ attacks benefit the Jews since it galvanizes the Western world into making Israel’s enemies their own – and gives Israel a free hand in dealing with the Palestinians who are looked upon as enemies of the world.
The infiltration of the Mossad into the US political & military infrastructure had its greatest impetus in the 1980’s during the Reagan and Bush Sr administrations. 3 Zionist Jews with close ties to the Mossad held influential offices in the Pentagon during this period:
Richard Perle: Perle worked at the Pentagon as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy from 1981 to 1987. Prior to this, Perle was investigated by the US Justice Department for discussing classified information with an employee at the Israeli Embassy, but of course, the case was dropped. View Entire Story Here & Here.
Paul Wolfowitz: Wolfowitz worked at the Pentagon as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Regional Programs from 1977-1982. At this time, he was involved in establishing the US military central command. From 1982-1986 Wolfowitz worked at the State Department as Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs. And from 1989-1993 Wolfowitz was back at the Pentagon as Under Secretary for Defense Policy. View Entire Story Here.
Douglas Feith: Feith worked at the Pentagon from 1984-1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy. Feith was also employed as Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary of Defense, Robert Sims. View Entire Story Here.
All three of these Zionist Jews, whose loyalties are first to Israel and their fellow Jews, were brought back into high Pentagon positions by their useful idiot, George Bush Jr, during his first term as President from 2001-2004.

According to Karen Kwiatkowski, former Political-Military Affairs Officer at the Pentagon, “high clearances were granted to Israeli’s & Likudniks who would march through the halls of the Pentagon.”
Having grown up as a Jew, I can attest that Zionists like Perle, Wolfowitz and Feith, would not scruple to bring moles into the Pentagon to spy on our nation. I say this because Jews have an attitude of derision and contempt for “Gentile” America. Zionist Jews look out for their own interests and will trash America when it comes to their own ’survival.’

DOV ZAKHEIM IS A TALMUDIC JEW and former Yeshiva University Professor. Zakheim served as Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller of the Pentagon from 2001-2005 at the height of the Jewish-neocons’ political influence. Prior to his Pentagon position, Zakheim was CEO of Systems Planning Corporation (SPC) from 1987-2001.
During Zakheim’s tenure with SPC, he helped to market SPC’s Flight Termination System, a technology that takes over the controls of an airborne vehicle in flight. The probability of the sinister use of SPC’s Flight Termination System, (of which, Zakheim had privileged access, and through Zakheim, the Mossad and their moles), deserves serious consideration for the reopening of the 9/11 investigation.
In fact, the Zionist Jew, Dov Zakheim, along with his Mossad cohorts, should be put on trial for the theft of public funds, treason, and the murder of thousands of innocent victims at the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001.

See Zakheim Hosting Rabbis On Pentagon Lawn Here
As the Pentagon’s Comptroller from 2001-2004, Zakheim oversaw three Department of Defense budgets, the combined amount totaling $1 trillion dollars. In the spring of 2003, a scandal erupted, in which $1 trillion dollars in financial transactions was unaccounted for. Bush immediately pointed to “faulty Pentagon accounting” which would have (& should have) placed the blame on Zakheim.
A study by the Defense Department’s Inspector General discovered that not only could the Pentagon not account for the trillion dollars in monies spent, but that the US Army somehow lost track of 56 airplanes, 32 tanks, and 36 Javelin missile command launch-units. View Entire Story Here.
How is that the Zionist Jew, Dov Zakheim, got off Scott free? And where did the money and military equipment end up? I say the money ended up in the hands of the Mossad – and the equipment in the hands of the Israeli Defense Force. For they had “their man” — Zionist Jew Dov Zakheim — in the Pentagon.

“ISRAEL IS THE EAVESDROPPING CAPITAL OF THE WORLD” observes James Bamford in his recent October 2008 book, The Shadow Factory – The Eavesdropping On America. In his book, Bamford gives a detailed account of how spying on American citizens since 9/11 has been outsourced to companies closely linked to Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad.
In an alarming passage, Bamford reveals that AT&T and Verizon outsourced their wire-tapping arrangements made with the FBI and the National Security Agency (NSA) to two companies founded in Israel, Verint and Narus. These two Israeli companies have close ties with the Mossad’s Unit 8200, the Israeli equivalent of the NSA.

Through the contractual agreement between America’s largest phone companies and the Israeli telecom firms, Verint and Narus, the Mossad has access to once-private American communications information. “Virtually all US voice and data communications can be remotely accessed by these companies in Israel,” writes Bamford.
Verint and Narus were founded by Israelis — the Israeli-born, Jacob Kobi Alexander, being the founder of Comverse Technology, Verint’s parent company, headquartered in Israel. Comverse Technology subcontracts the installation of tapping equipment now built into every phone system in America. And Comverse maintains its own connections to the phone tapping equipment, insisting that it is for “maintenance purposes only.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

Methinks That That Zionist Jews With The Mossad At The Head
Have America By Its Tail


Le dernier livre de Kerry Bolton Stalin – The Enduring Legacy présente un côté de Staline faisant grandement penser à Poutine, voire au national-socialisme, opposé à la fois à l’internationale trotskiste et à l’internationale capitaliste du « nouvel ordre mondial ». Tant Staline que Poutine sont diabolisés par les juifs américains et la juiverie internationale, fortement influencés par la pensée trotskiste (écouter à ce sujet le fondateurs et porte-parole des « prisonniers de Sion » refuzniks, Nathan Sharansky, président de la Jewish Agency qui a grandement inspiré George W. Bush, comme le rapportait le leader néocon juif William Kristol, fils du fameux Trotskyiste Irving Kristol alias « Néo« , qui fut l’un des principaux fondateurs du néo-conservatisme).


Stalin: The Enduring Legacy considers the ‘Man of Steel’ in a manner that will outrage dogmatists of both Left and Right. Stalinist Russia is reassessed as a state that transcended Marxism, and proceeded on a nationalist and imperial path rather than as the citadel of ‘world revolution’. Stalin reversed many early Bolshevik policies re-instituting, for example, the traditional family. He abolished the Communist International, championed ‘realism’ in the arts and rejected post-1945 US plans for a ‘new world order’. Despite so-called ‘de-Stalinization’ after his death, the Soviet bloc continued to oppose globalism, as does Putin’s Russia. Stalin: The Enduring Legacy, examines the anti-Marxist character of Stalinism, the legitimacy of the Moscow Trials against the ‘Old Bolsheviks’, the origins of the Cold War, the development of Trotskyism as a tool of US foreign policy, the question of Stalin’s murder, and the relevance of Russia to the future of world power politics. ‘Dr. Bolton’s book Stalin: The Enduring Legacy is a major contribution to the proper understanding of Russian, as well as American, politics and society in the twentieth century. It brushes aside the anti-Stalinist biases of the Trotskyist American chroniclers of this historical period to reveal the unquestionable integrity of Stalin as a nationalist leader. At the same time, it highlights the vital differences between the Russian national character rooted in the soil and history of Russia, and its opposite,the rootless Jewish cosmopolitanism that Trotskyist Marxism sought to impose on the Russians – as well as on the rest of the world’. – Dr Alexander Jacob

Zyuganov Communists Continue Stalin’s Fight Against “Rootless Cosmopolitanism” By Kerry R. Bolton

America’s ‘World Revolution’: Neo-Trotskyist Foundations of U.S. Foreign Policy By Kerry R. Bolton

A major international strain of anti-Stalinism was sponsored by the CIA (Wikipedia)

Modern art was CIA ‘weapon’ in Cold War?

Zyuganov Communists Continue Stalin’s Fight Against “Rootless Cosmopolitanism”  by Dr Kerry Bolton

Le conflit de Staline avec les juifs par Kerry Bolton

(…)Les trotskistes se pressèrent sous les bannières des USA, et la CIA fonda le Congrès pour la Liberté Culturelle, une tentative pour enrôler les intellectuels et les artistes dans une offensive de propagande contre l’URSS. Les fondateurs comprenaient les dirigeants trotskistes Sidney Hook, James Burnham, Melvin Lasky, et d’éminents socialistes anti-soviétiques comme Arthur Koestler, Bertrand Russell et le poète Stephen Spender. L’un des patrons britanniques était Frederic Warburg de la famille de banquiers Warburg, Frederic étant propriétaire de Secker &Warburg, qui publiait des livres trotskistes et d’autres livres socialistes anti-staliniens.  Origines des néo-conservateurs actuels

Václav Havel: The “Inner Enemy” by Kerry Bolton

(…) In 1938 André Breton,[13] Mexican communist muralist Diego Rivera,[14] and Leon Trotsky issued a manifesto entitled Towards a Free Revolutionary Art.[15] The manifesto was published in the Autumn 1938 issue of The Partisan Review, a magazine that was of significance in the Cold War-Trotskyite offensive. Trotsky, according to Breton, had actually written the Manifesto, which states:
Insofar as it originates with an individual, insofar as it brings into play subjective talents to create something which brings about an objective enriching of culture, any philosophical, sociological, scientific, or artistic discovery seems to be the fruit of a precious chance, that is to say, the manifestation, more or less spontaneous, of necessity. . . . Specifically, we cannot remain indifferent to the intellectual conditions under which creative activity takes place, nor should we fail to pay all respect to those particular laws that govern intellectual creation.
In the contemporary world we must recognize the ever more widespread destruction of those conditions under which intellectual creation is possible. . . . The regime of Hitler, now that it has rid Germany of all those artists whose work expressed the slightest sympathy for liberty, however superficial, has reduced those who still consent to take up pen or brush to the status of domestic servants of the regime. . . . If reports may be believed, it is the same in the Soviet Union. . . . True art, which is not content to play variations on ready-made models but rather insists on expressing the inner needs of man and of mankind in its time — true art is unable not to be revolutionary, not to aspire to a complete and radical reconstruction of society. . . . We recognize that only the social revolution can sweep clean the path for a new culture. If, however, we reject all solidarity with the bureaucracy now in control of the Soviet Union it is precisely because, in our eyes, it represents, not communism, but its most treacherous and dangerous enemy. . . .
The criterion for art given here by Trotsky seems more of the nature of the anarchism of Breton and of the future New Left than of the collectivist nature of Marxism. F. Chernov, whose important statement on the arts from a Stalinist viewpoint will be considered below, was to refer to such art as “nihilism.”
Given that the manifesto was published in The Partisan Review, which was later to receive subsidies from the CIA and the tax-exempt foundations as party to what became the “Cultural Cold War,” this Trotskyist art manifesto served as the basis for the art policy that was adopted after World War II by the CIA and the globalists as part of the Cold War offensive.[16] Trotsky wrote Towards a Free Revolutionary Art as a call for mobilization by artists throughout the world, to oppose on the cultural front Fascism and Stalinism, which to many Leftists and communists were synonymous…

Stalin: The Enduring Legacy

1,420 words
Kerry Bolton
Stalin: The Enduring Legacy
London: Black House Publishing, 2012

At the beginning of 1989, I thought that “Russia” (the USSR) was an evil empire, a totalitarian system built on repression and propaganda and bent on global domination. I also thought that the United States was the principal impediment to Soviet world domination, the bulwark of freedom. By the end of 1989, I was giddy, for America had stood firm long enough for the USSR to collapse of its internal contradictions before it could cast its net over the entire globe.
Today, however, things seem very different. Like many White Nationalists, I see the United States as an evil empire, a soft totalitarian system built on lies and repression and pursuing global domination. Indeed, our system is built on the same lie as Communism: human equality. Furthermore, Russia is now the principal bulwark against American global domination.
But this time, the stake is not “freedom” but something far more important, for if unchecked, American-style global liberalism and capitalism mean the death of the white race. Thus, if our race is to survive, Russia must stand firm against globalization until the American system succumbs to its own inner contradictions before it can drag the rest of the world down with it.
Kerry Bolton’s Stalin: The Enduring Legacy shows that the roots of the present world situation are far deeper than I had imagined.
Stalin is one of history’s greatest monsters, and Bolton’s book does not attempt to deny or minimize Stalin’s crimes, although I would find such a revisionist project interesting to read, given that our image of Stalin was manufactured by some of the same people who manufactured our image of Hitler, which is largely false.
Bolton’s main concern is with Stalin’s “legacy,” namely his influence on present-day Realpolitik, the conflict between the forces of globalization and the forces of national self-determination. And it turns out that Stalin’s principal enemy is our own, namely the international Jewish community, although Stalin himself never saw it that way.
Bolton’s book is filled with surprising revelations.
Chapter 1, “Stalin’s Fight Against International Communism,” outlines the basis of Stalin’s conflict with Trotsky. Once in power, Stalin reversed a number of the policies established by Lenin and favored by Trotsky and his followers.
(…)Stalin, however, was not Jewish. He was also an orthodox Communist. He funded the revolution by robbing banks, not borrowing from them. Thus Stalin turned the USSR toward economic autarky and full-scale collectivization of industry and agriculture, with catastrophic consequences for the peasantry and workers.
Stalin did, however, pursue much healthier policies in the social realm. He sought to restore the family and marriage, limit access to abortion, reestablish discipline and standards in education, and combat “rootless cosmopolitanism” and “formalism” in art and culture in the name of artistic styles rooted in folk culture and capable of appealing to and elevating the tastes of the masses.
Stalin is widely condemned as a philistine, but in truth he had well-developed tastes in art and music. The positive effects that he had on Soviet culture can be illustrated most clearly by comparing Shostakovich’s fourth symphony, an avant-garde train-wreck which he withdrew under criticism, with his fifth symphony, one of the great symphonies of the 20th century, which Stalin wrung out of him using the muse of terror.
Bolton never really gives us a sense of why Stalin did any of this. What really made him tick? He was clearly highly intelligent, outfoxing some of the shrewdest statesmen and schemers in history. He was also demonstrably well-versed in Marxist theory and appeared to be a sincere Communist. He knew a great deal about history. And he had excellent taste in music.
Yet he seemed entirely lacking in morality and human warmth. He was not a Russian, so he could not be accused of nationalistic sentiments. He was also an atheist, so religion played no role in his life. He had no sentimentality about the past and was a deep-dyed revolutionary. But in spite of all this, perhaps out of sheer pragmatism, Stalin gave the USSR a somewhat nationalistic, somewhat socially conservative form of socialism.
Chapter 2, “Stalin and the Art of Rootless Cosmopolitanism,” deals with the cozy relationship between Trotskyite exiles in the United States, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Rockefeller foundation in promoting Abstract Expressionism and other forms of modern art as the all American answer to Stalinist philistinism.
The fact that the US government ended up using the tax dollars of Idaho potato farmers and Texas ranchers to promote cultural Bolshevism in the art world as a purely symbolic element of the Trotskyite opposition to Stalin is, frankly, astonishing. Whenever whites permit a critical mass of Jews in our societies, it seems inevitable that we become pawns in Jewish machinations, even arcane “inner party” disputes that are utterly detached from reality.
Chapter 3, “The Moscow Trials in Historical Context,” is the most remarkable chapter in the book. Here Bolton lays out in great detail just how plausible Stalin’s case against the Trotskyite opposition was.
The fact that so many of Stalin’s policy preferences ran counter to the ethnic interests and tastes of Bolshevism’s huge Jewish contingent meant that Stalin’s policies inevitably seemed anti-Semitic to the most ethnocentric Jewish communists, who became the core of the Trotskyite opposition. (Later, the the Zionist wing of the Trotskyite movement became the nucleus of neconservatism.)
But calling Stalin an anti-Semite is an undeserved compliment. Yes, he was an anti-Trotskyite. Yes, later he was an anti-Zionist. Yes, Stalin killed countless Jewish Bolsheviks. But one could not purge an overwhelmingly Jewish party without purging some Jews. Nevertheless, Stalin maintained the loyalty of many Jewish communists to the very end. Thus Stalin was an anti-Semite only in Joe Sobran’s sense of the term: Jews hated him. But Stalin didn’t hate Jews as such. He fought them only to the extent that they opposed his policies and his conception of Communism.
But nevertheless, Stalin did change the ethnic character of Soviet Communism from something recognizably Jewish and nihilistic to something recognizably Russian and socially conservative. And although Jews were a privileged people in the USSR up to the very end, they no longer felt that the regime was theirs. According to Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, after Stalin’s death, the regime took active steps to curb Jewish overrepresentation in elite institutions. Jews were still massively overrepresented, but from the kvetching, you would think they were making bricks for the pharaoh. By the 1970s, an exodus to Israel and the United States was underway. This gives some hope for American whites. For even token efforts to limit Jewish overrepresentation in our society will be magnified immensely by Jewish hypersensitivity, perhaps enough to spark an exodus of our own.
Chapters 4 and 5 deal with the origins of the Cold War. Contrary to the old Right-wing American canard that the United Nations was a communist conspiracy to destroy American sovereignty, the United Nations actually sought to establish a genuine world government under US control at the end of the Second World War, and it was Stalin who stopped it in its tracks. Furthermore, the United States wanted to “internationalize” atomic energy, which meant that the UN, under the control of the US, would take control of uranium mining and refinement to maintain the US monopoly on atomic weapons. When Stalin said nyet to both, one world government was halted and the Cold War was off and running. And, as it turns out, Trotskyites took part in every aspect of the Cold War’s implementation.
Chapters 6 and 7 deal with Stalin’s death (poison) and post-Soviet Russia. After the collapse of the USSR, the United States sought to establish a unipolar hegemony and to bring Russia into the global system. Many of the architects of this New World Order were neoconservative offshoots of the Trotskyite movement and their ethnic kin. Vladimir Putin, however, spiked their plans, which is one reason he is likened to Stalin today. And that is how we have arrived at the present correlation of forces: globalist, Judaized America vs. European, nationalist Russia.
I highly recommend Stalin: The Enduring Legacy. It is a slender volume of 160 pages that you can breeze through in an afternoon. My only complaint is that the book was evidently rushed into print and is swarming with typos and formatting problems that will inevitably detract somewhat from its impact.
If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the « Add special instructions to seller » box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Stalin’s Fight Against International Communism by Kerry Bolton
This is the first chapter of Kerry Bolton’s new book Stalin: The Enduring Legacy (London: Black House Publishing, 2012). The chapter is being reprinted as formatted in the book. Counter-Currents will also run a review of the book, which I highly recommend. 


Trotsky, Stalin and the Cold War: The Historic Implications and Continuing Ramifications of the Trotsky-Stalin Conflict By Kerry Bolton

The Moscow Trials were symptomatic of a great divide that had occurred in Bolshevism. The Allied alliance with Stalin during World War II had formed an assumption among internationalists of the US ‘foreign policy establishment’ that after the Axis defeat a ‘new world order’ might emerge via the United Nations Organisation. This assumption was ill-founded, and the result was the Cold War. Trotskyists emerged as avid Cold Warriors dialectically concluding that the USSR represented the primary obstacle to world socialism. This essay examines the dialectical process by which major factions of Trotskyism became, in Stalinist parlance, a ‘tool of foreign powers and of world capitalism.’(…)

Le conflit de Staline avec les Juifs 
par Kerry R. Bolton

Histoire :: Europe de l’Est

Le conflit de Staline avec les Juifs

Staline était-il juif ? L’arrière-petit-fils détruit le mythe de l’ascendance juive de Staline

La scission entre Trotski et Staline il y a quelque 80 ans continue à avoir des conséquences cruciales pour la politique mondiale. Certains ont vu cela comme une brouille entre criminels, certains comme rien de plus qu’une dispute tactique entre des bolcheviks qui partageaient néanmoins un but commun, certains comme une querelle familiale juive de plus.

Il y a des historiens qui pensent que Staline était un antisémite, ou qu’en fait il avait toujours été contrôlé par les Juifs. Certains pensent que Staline était lui-même juif et qu’il a apporté à l’URSS et à ses satellites autant de bienfaits juifs que l’ont fait Trotski, Bela Kun et les autres.

Parmi les auteurs non-orthodoxes et qualifiés d’« antisémites », une faction pense que le conflit de Staline avec Trotski et la purge des trotskistes et des autres Vieux Bolcheviks, juifs pour la plupart, montre que Staline suivait une voie qui n’était pas seulement opposée aux Juifs mais aussi à de nombreux égards opposée au bolchevisme.

Le bolchevisme inversé de Staline

Staline étant bien installé comme dictateur de l’URSS, il inversa beaucoup des préceptes bolcheviks. La maternité fut honorée, avec un « Ordre de la gloire maternelle » dans le style nazi [1]. Des lois anti-avortement et anti-divorce furent passées en 1936, et l’homosexualité fut mise hors la loi. Le réalisme socialiste devint l’art officiel. Staline poursuivit des objectifs panslavistes à la place de celui de la « révolution mondiale » défendu par Trotski. L’Association des Vieux Bolcheviks fut dissoute, tout comme le Komintern. Il n’y aurait pas de « révolution mondiale », il y aurait une expansion territoriale soviétique. Les partis communistes du monde entier serviraient la politique étrangère soviétique. Dans le cas de la Chine, Staline ne reconnut pas les maoïstes avant qu’ils n’aient vraiment expulsé de Chine Tchang Kaï Tchek. Son ambassadeur resta avec les Nationalistes jusqu’à la fin. Le Département d’Etat américain fit plus que Staline pour promouvoir le communisme en Chine.(…)

Guerre froide

Avec la montée de l’Allemagne nazie, Roosevelt maintint une politique pro-Staline, ce qui pourrait expliquer le refus des USA d’autoriser l’entrée de la dépouille de Trotski aux USA en 1940. Après la seconde guerre mondiale, les USA espéraient pouvoir créer un Nouvel Ordre Mondial (comme Wilson avait tenté de le faire après la première guerre mondiale avec la Société des Nations) à travers l’ONU et avec Staline comme partenaire subalterne.

Pour sa part, Staline anéantit ces espoirs en s’assurant que l’ONU soit rendue inutile en tant que Parlement Mondial embryonnaire sous contrôle US. Au lieu de laisser le pouvoir être investi dans l’Assemblée générale (où les votes des nations à la fois criblées de dettes et fatiguées de la guerre comme la Grande-Bretagne et des pays du Tiers Monde émergeant pouvaient être achetés), Staline maintint inflexiblement qu’il ne rejoindrait l’ONU que si le Conseil de Sécurité avait un droit de veto.

Le Plan Baruch (ainsi nommé d’après le nom du banquier international et « vieil homme d’Etat américain » Bernard Baruch) pour l’« internationalisation de l’énergie atomique » (encore une façade pour le contrôle US, comme le remarqua à juste titre l’URSS) fut également rejeté par Staline.

Le rejet par Staline de ces plans mondialistes entraîna la « guerre froide ». Certains théoriciens de la conspiration ont prétendu que cette animosité était une supercherie par laquelle toutes les nations seraient attirées dans l’orbite US ou soviétique alors que toutes deux seraient secrètement d’accord. Les USA n’étaient pas prêts pour une guerre chaude ; ils visaient à un contrôle au moyen de la dette et de la subversion (en grande partie culturelle).

Concernant cette époque, le philosophe américain Yockey écrit :

« Cela commença au début de 1947 avec le refus des Russes d’abandonner une partie de leur souveraineté aux dénommées ‘Nations Unies’ dans un but de ‘contrôle’ de l’industrie des armes atomiques. (…) Ce refus russe dérangea les plans de la direction juive (…) La politique suivante de la direction juive fut de persuader le régime de Staline, par l’encerclement et par la pression de la ‘guerre froide’, que toute résistance était sans espoir… »
(F.P. Yockey, Qu’y a-t-il derrière la pendaison des onze Juifs de Prague ?, 1952)

Les trotskistes se pressèrent sous les bannières des USA, et la CIA fonda le Congrès pour la Liberté Culturelle, une tentative pour enrôler les intellectuels et les artistes dans une offensive de propagande contre l’URSS. Les fondateurs comprenaient les dirigeants trotskistes Sidney Hook, James Burnham, Melvin Lasky, et d’éminents socialistes anti-soviétiques comme Arthur Koestler, Bertrand Russell et le poète Stephen Spender. L’un des patrons britanniques était Frederic Warburg de la famille de banquiers Warburg, Frederic étant propriétaire de Secker & Warburg, qui publiait des livres trotskistes et d’autres livres socialistes anti-staliniens.

Origines des néo-conservateurs actuels

Cet arrière-plan est important pour notre compréhension de la politique étrangère et militaire américaine d’aujourd’hui. Les trotskistes qui s’alignèrent avec les USA dans une croisade contre une Russie débarrassée de Trotski devinrent les mentors et les pères des néo-cons qui dirigent aujourd’hui à Washington. Irving Kristol (père de l’actuel néo-con et directeur de l’influent Weekly Standard), William Kristol, Jean Kirkpatrick (ex-ambassadeur US à l’ONU), Wolfowitz du Département de la Défense, commencèrent comme trotskistes. La stratégie militaire et diplomatique fondamentale de l’après-guerre fut conçue par des intellectuels ex-trotskistes comme James Burnham. Il fut décoré de la Médaille de la Liberté par Reagan, tout comme le vieux « menchevik », le Prof. Sidney Hook. Les politiques trotskistes de la guerre froide furent intégrées dans l’actuel programme mondialiste US et la dénommée « guerre contre le terrorisme ».

Ce que nous voyons aujourd’hui comme de la politique étrangère US est fondamentalement du trotskisme. Le président Bush déclare que les USA sont le centre d’un « mouvement démocratique mondial ». La conception US de la démocratie est considérée comme un système universellement applicable et le monde entier doit s’y conformer. Les stratèges politiques comme Michael Ledeen écrivent que les USA sont le centre d’une révolution mondiale ; que les USA ont une mission messianique de « destruction créatrice ». C’est ainsi que le trotskisme s’est transformé en doctrine actuelle des USA, et qu’il a ses origines dans la rupture Staline-Trotski.

L’origine ethnique de Staline

Quant à Staline, le mythe de ses origines juives continue. Un article de R.N. Terrall dans le numéro de mai/juin 2003 de la revue révisionniste Barnes Review tente de montrer les origines juives de Staline. Des traits supposément juifs incluent l’opposition à l’establishment, un talent pour les pamphlets et des capacités organisationnelles, et un intérêt pour les langues étrangères.

Il est aussi affirmé que Joseph est un nom typiquement juif, ce qui aurait été impensable pour un non-Juif dans la Russie tsariste. Pourtant Joseph fut baptisé dans l’Eglise orthodoxe et fut placé au séminaire par une mère dévote.

La principale affirmation concernant l’origine juive de Staline est que son nom patrilinéaire Djugachvili signifie « fils d’un Juif » en géorgien. « Dju » est supposé signifier « juif ». Pourtant, si c’est un nom juif si transparent, il n’y eut pas d’effort particulier pour le cacher, en dépit de l’adoption du pseudonyme de parti « Staline » en 1912. Les Djugachvili continuent à être bien connus en Russie et ils ne sont pas particulièrement bien disposés envers les Juifs, même aujourd’hui. En fait, le petit-fils de Staline fut candidat au Parlement russe il y a quelques années avec un programme nationaliste et anti-sioniste. Staline jouit aujourd’hui d’un regain de popularité chez les nationalistes de tendance dure qui ne sont pas bien disposés envers les sionistes et les oligarques juifs et qui seraient sûrement au courant si Djugachvili signifiait vraiment « fils d’un Juif ». L’arrière-petit-fils de Staline, Jacob Djugachvili, écrit :

« Mon père Evgueni Djugachvili fut cofondateur de l’Union des Officiers (Soyouz Officierov) et de la Société de Staline. En 2000, il fut candidat aux élections parlementaires en Russie (la Douma). Il n’appela pas à la ‘restauration du communisme’, mais à traduire en justice ceux qui envahirent la Russie en 1917, mais échappèrent à un jugement, ceux qui vendirent notre pays au sionisme mondial : Gorbatchev, Eltsine, Chevardnadze… »
(cité sur le site de Peter Myers : http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/)

Mr. Terrall dit aussi que le premier-né de Staline fut prénommé Yakov, pour sûr un nom juif, et que les trois enfants de Staline épousèrent tous des conjoints juifs, et que ses trois épouses étaient juives.

Pas d’épouses juives

L’arrière-petit-fils Jacob Djugachvili, en réponse à la question du chercheur australien Peter Myers, déclare à propos des soi-disant « trois femmes juives » de Staline :

« Oui, vous pouvez ajouter mes commentaires sur ces conneries concernant J. Staline et Rosa Kaganovitch… Je pense que vous devriez corriger et signaler que ni Ekaterine Svanidze ni Nadezhda Allilueva n’étaient juives… Avant tout, vous devez savoir que Staline fut marié deux fois : sa première femme fut Ekaterine Svanidze, une Géorgienne avec laquelle il eut un fils, Yakov. Il n’y a pas la moindre trace de sang juif. La seconde femme fut Nadezhda Allilueva, une Russe du Sud avec du sang gitan, avec laquelle il eut Svetlana et Vassili… Pour l’arbre généalogique, veuillez jeter un coup d’œil sur : www.jugashvili.com »

Lazar Kaganovtich, le bras droit de Staline qui réussit à survivre aux purges contre ses compagnons juifs, avait une sœur et une nièce toutes deux prénommées Rosa. Aucune des deux ne fut jamais la femme ou la maîtresse de Staline.

Mr. Terrall et d’autres semblent conclure trop facilement à une origine juive sur la base d’un prénom ou d’un second prénom juifs, alors que bien sûr l’utilisation de tels prénoms est une coutume chrétienne.

Signification de Djugachvili

Concernant le nom « Djugachvili » lui-même, signifiant soi-disant « fils d’un juif », d’une évidence accablante, Jacob Djugachvili écrit :

« J’espère que vous avez vu l’arbre généalogique sur mon site web, de sorte que je n’aie pas besoin d’expliquer mes origines.

Je commencerai par la fin de votre message. Avant tout, vous devez savoir que dans l’alphabet géorgien il y a deux consonnes ‘G’, un qui se prononce comme la première lettre de ‘Great’ et un autre ‘G’ qui se prononce comme le ‘R’ français, donc notre nom se prononce ‘Dju’ ‘r’ ‘achvili’. D’habitude notre nom s’écrit Dzhugashvili, parce qu’il n’y a pas de ‘J’ dans l’alphabet russe, donc les Russes utilisent deux lettres, ‘D’ et ‘ZH’ … J’ai donc décidé de l’écrire JUGASHVILI parce que l’alphabet anglais me permet d’utiliser un ‘J’ à la place des trois lettres ‘D’, ‘Z’ et ‘H’… Maintenant, la chose principale concernant l’origine du nom : il y a un village dans l’est de la Géorgie (la Kakhetia – une région vinicole, vous en avez probablement entendu parler) appelé Ju ‘r’ aani… »

Jacob Djugachvili ajoute :

« …Il n’existe pas de mot JUIF pour désigner les Juifs en langue géorgienne… Juif en géorgien se dit ‘EBRAELI’, donc la théorie du ‘fils de juif’ (qui est très tentante si l’on examine notre nom à la lumière de sa prononciation anglaise) est simplement erronée… »

La signification du nom n’est donc pas l’évident « fils de juif », mais une référence à un village de l’est de la Géorgie.

Si l’on considère le mal que Staline et les dirigeants ultérieurs se sont donné pour dissimuler les origines juives de Lénine, il semble évident que Staline aurait cherché encore plus complètement à cacher son nom de famille s’il avait vraiment sonné comme : « Hé les Russes, je suis le fils d’un Juif ! ».

Sang khevsure et ossète

L’écrivain John Jewell, qui publia pendant les années 80 un bulletin très bien informé, Direct Action, qui traitait souvent des questions russes, dit concernant les origines ethniques de Staline :

« Père – Vissarion Ivoanovitch Djugachvili : cordonnier géorgien de la féroce tribu Khevsure. Racialement de la race tauride des caucasoïdes : spécifiquement du type Mtebid, qui est transitif entre les grands Dinariques europoïdes et les petits Arménoïdes asiatiques de la région.
Mère : Ekaterina Georgievna Geladze, paysanne du village de Gambareuil. Elle avait du sang ossète, sa famille venant des proches montagnes d’Ossétie du Sud, une région chrétienne incorporée à la Géorgie. Les Ossètes sont des Indo-Européens : grands, blonds à 30%, avec des yeux clairs. Ossète vient de ‘Asas’ (« astral »), un nom tribal aryen… venant des anciens Alains, un peuple sauromate-scythe qui dominait la steppe et le Caucase du Nord… »

C’est ce sang qui coulait dans ses veines lorsque Joseph Djugachvili, un sabre à la main, accomplissait l’ancienne danse de la tribu guerrière Khevsure lors de son mariage en 1904, dans la maison du révolutionnaire nationaliste géorgien, le prince Budu Mdivani.

Purges contre les Juifs et les sionistes

Quant aux Juifs parmi les révolutionnaires, Staline rejoignit les Bolcheviks parce qu’il trouvait qu’ils comptaient moins de Juifs que les Mencheviks, et dit au révolutionnaire Razdem Arsenidze que les Mencheviks (dont Trotski fit partie jusqu’à la veille de la prise de contrôle bolchevik) n’étaient que des Juifs non-circoncis … des couards et des boutiquiers ».

S’étant débarrassé de la faction trotskiste avant la guerre, Staline put ensuite revenir à la question juive. Dans la Région Autonome Juive du Birobidjan, il ordonna une purge de la direction communiste et interdit le seul journal yiddish de l’URSS. En 1947 commença une purge contre les Juifs dans les domaines culturel et politique. Les théâtres juifs furent fermés. Le dirigeant juif, Solomon Mikhoels, renommé comme acteur et directeur, mais associé aux causes sioniste et juive, fut écrasé par un camion et son corps laissé dans la rue. En 1949, les Juifs furent purgés des postes militaires et diplomatiques. Entre 1949 et 1952, 30.000 Juifs furent déportés au Birobidjan où ils furent obligés de demeurer. Ils étaient traités de « cosmopolites sans racines ». Les purges furent conduites par Jdanov qui mourut soudainement en 1948. En 1952, une purge commença contre les Juifs dans les postes administratifs et de direction. La presse soviétique affirma que ces Juifs étaient liés au sionisme.

Staline utilisa plus tard la mort de Jdanov pour accuser des docteurs juifs de l’avoir tué – le dénommé « complot des blouses blanches » –, et de préparer le meurtre d’autres dirigeants soviétiques incluant lui-même.

En 1951, le chef du part communiste tchèque, Rudolf Slansky, fut limogé pour « activités contre l’Etat ». L’année suivante, lui et treize autres furent jugés comme trotskistes et sionistes. Onze furent pendus. Les Juifs d’outre-mer furent aussi impliqués dans une conspiration sioniste de grande ampleur avec Israël et les USA au centre – incluant « le nationaliste juif » et ministre français des Colonies, Georges Mandel [2] ; et Moshe Pijade, l’« idéologue juif titiste » en Yougoslavie. Slansky fut décrit par la presse stalinienne comme étant « un sioniste par sa nature même ». De telles actions dans l’appareil soviétique contre les Juifs en tant qu’agents sionistes continuèrent jusque dans les années 60, particulièrement en Tchécoslovaquie et en Pologne (Paul Lendvai, Anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe, 1971).

En février 1953, Staline autorisa la construction de camps de concentration au Kazakhstan, en Sibérie et dans le Nord arctique. Les Juifs soviétiques devaient y être déportés. Considérant les sionistes et les USA comme étroitement liés, Staline envisageait aussi une offensive atomique contre l’Amérique.

Staline assassiné par Beria

Pourtant, en mars 1953, seulement quelques semaines avant le procès des docteurs accusés dans le « complot des blouses blanches », Staline s’effondra juste après avoir dîné avec Beria, Khrouchtchev et deux autres membres du Politburo. Sa mort fut annoncée quatre jours plus tard, comme étant due à une hémorragie du cerveau. Pourtant le rapport des docteurs, qui n’a été révélé que récemment, atteste que la cause fut une hémorragie de l’estomac, suggérant un empoisonnement.

Le chef juif de la police secrète de Staline, Beria, semble avoir été la figure centrale dans la mort de Staline. Les gardes de Staline avaient été renvoyés par l’un des hommes de Beria. Quand Staline fut finalement découvert gisant sur le plancher, Beria fut appelé et maintint que Staline était seulement endormi. Vingt-quatre heures plus tard, Khrouchtchev fit venir les docteurs. Même à ce moment, Beria avait encore peur de Staline, vomissant sa haine puis restant prostré suivant l’état de conscience de Staline. Beria resta à le veiller et quand Staline mourut quelques jours plus tard, Beria ressortit rayonnant de joie.

Sergo Beria, le fils de Lavrenti Beria, déclare dans une biographie que son père avait toujours détesté Staline. Il raconte que son père faisait allusion à un assassinat.

Beria craignait de faire partie de la prochaine purge ; un de plus dans une longue série des chefs juifs successifs de la police secrète.

Molotov rappela qu’alors que lui et Beria se tenaient sur la Place Rouge pour faire l’éloge funèbre de Staline, Beria se tourna vers Molotov et dit : « Je l’ai supprimé ».

Après la mort de Staline, Beria qui était le chef de l’énorme appareil policier tout comme celui de l’énergie atomique, préparait une prise du pouvoir. L’armée soviétique sous le commandement du maréchal Joukov l’exécuta.

Quant aux rumeurs continuelles concernant Staline, son arrière-petit-fils commente :

« …De telles histoires (il y en a beaucoup ; vous devriez regarder les journaux de la période de la ‘perestroïka’ !) furent inventées pour une raison : pour discréditer son nom et distraire l’attention du peuple loin du sujet principal : le combat de Staline contre l’invasion sioniste de la Russie et des autres nations unies à elle. »

[1] Sous le IIIe Reich, les mères de famille « méritantes » étaient honorées par une décoration, que l’humour populaire qualifia de « Kaninchen Order » (« Ordre du lapin »). (NDT)

[2] Il s’agit visiblement d’une erreur de l’auteur. Georges Mandel fut ministre des Colonies de 1938 à 1940, et était effectivement le chef de file de la tendance belliciste dans l’état français ; il fut exécuté par la Milice vichyste en 1944. Les commentaires précités de la presse soviétique peuvent avoir été faits après le Pacte germano-soviétique (août 1939). Ou bien l’auteur de cet article parle bien de l’année 1952, mais a confondu Mandel avec quelqu’un d’autre. (NDT)

Article publié dans la revue néo-zélandaise « Western Destiny », N° 36, août 2004.

YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH 101 Books Nationalists Need to Read and Understand Before ‘They’ Burn Them, by Michael Collins Piper (2013) p.214-217

“America would be destroyed along with the Jews”

If your paper is to continue its excellent work of opposing the policy of the Jew, please do not fight Russia also, for we in Europe look upon it as the only hope to prevent Jewish world domination by means of its stupid, willing, technically clever American slaves, the destroyers of Europe’s cities, the hate-mongers of the vile occupation and the hangmen of Nuremberg.

—European correspondent to Common Sense (a newspaper published in the US between 1947 and 1972)

Both Germans and Russians seemed to have a better grasp of the Jewish Question than the trusting, naive Americans with little experience in the plate tectonics of the clash of civilizations. At the left, a National Socialist pamphlet: “Roosevelt betrays America!”
 The Germans thus caricatured a Jew controlling the American president as his puppet.
 ~ ~ ~

L’erreur de la plupart des anti-communistes est de croire que le coeur du complot communiste international serait en Russie et donc que la Russie « crypto-communiste » serait sur le point de ressusciter l’URSS. En fait le coeur du communisme international était aux États-Unis. Les anti-communistes croient pour la plupart que le courant conservateur américain a toujours été à l’avant-garde de l’anti-communisme. Ils ignorent que le conservatisme américain a été infiltré et instrumentalisé par des Trotskistes et que ce sont précisément ces Trotskistes (juifs pour la plupart) qui sont derrière la guerre froide, cette paranoïa et cette haine contre l’URSS et contre les Russes eux-mêmes. C’est de ce terreau trotskiste pseudo-conservateur qu’a émergé le « néo-conservatisme ». Le discours de la John Birch Society et du National Review (du demi-juif William F. Buckley) est identique à la propagande anti-Poutine et anti-Russie qu’on nous sert aujourd’hui du côté puissances sionistes et américaines-occidentales!  Et le pire c’est que le camp des soi-disant patriotes anti-mondialistes est aussi infiltré par les trotskistes devenus néocons.

Ce que les membres de la JBS ne savent pas c’est que leur héro anti-communiste J. Edgar Hoover était secrètement le « trotskyiste en chef » du parti communiste américain lié à la plus grande organisation communiste américaine… Le mccarthyisme a été utilisé par les trotskistes pour faire le ménage au sens de la mouvance communiste aux USA, afin de vouer aux gémonies les staliniens et les pro-soviets. 

Faut-il souligner que nombre de ces trotskistes étaient juifs? C’est probablement ce qui explique la position pro-juive et pro-israélienne (judéo-chrétienne occidentaliste) de la JBS, qui a toujours présenté Israel comme un bastion de l’Occident et du monde libre contre les « ennemis de l’Occident » que sont les communistes (alors qu’en réalité, c’est Israel qui avait le plus grand nombre de partis communistes à l’époque!). Ivan Kalmar souligne lui aussi avec insistance l’antisémitisme du stalinisme: The Trotskys, Freuds and Woody Allens: Portrait of a Culture.

N’oublions pas que la Tchéka, ancêtre du KGB, et le Goulag n’ont pas été inventés par Staline mais par la première génération de révolutionnaires juifs bolchéviques, soit précisément ceux que Staline a fait éliminer…

Stalin’s Last Crime: The Plot Against the Jewish Doctors 1948-1953

Où l’on apprend que la dernière dose de médicament a été donnée à Staline le soir de Pourim. L’ouvrage montre que Staline a été tué par ceux qu’il voulait faire tuer: ses médecins juifs qu’il savait être en train de conspirer contre lui.

Stalin’s 1937 Counter-Revolution Against Trotskyism
Dan Michaels

Soviet general Victor Filatov summed it up as such:

Glorious 1937! In that year Stalin finally came to understand that it was Zionism, not Communism, that was being built in the USSR and he destroyed it. After 1937, Suvorov and Kutuzov, Nakhimov and Ushakov, Bogdan Khmelnitsky and the “Knight in Tiger Skin” became the national symbols. And the Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians – all those whom the Zionists had destroyed and left to rot in prisons, labeled “nationalists” or “anti-Semites – returned. General Viktor Filatov [“Glorious 1937!”, Zavtra, 9 September 1997. The Russian national heroes are: General Aleksandr Suvorov, General Mikhail Kutuzov, Admiral Pavel Nakhimov, and Admiral Fyodor Ushakov. The Knight in the Tiger’s skin is Prince Tariel of India, from the famous Georgian poem Vephkhviskhaosani.]
In his book Myths and the Truth about 1937: Stalin’s Counter-Revolution (YAZA-PRESS, Moscow, 2010, 288 pp.), Andrei Burovsky assumes the role of devil’s advocate or apologist for the crimes committed by Josef Stalin during the time of  “The Great Purge.”(…)
Burovsky’s view is that the events of 1937 did not represent the usual case in which the devil under indictment is accused of crimes against innocent victims, but rather a case in which the devil is alleged to have committed crimes against another devil of even greater evil; it was the war between Stalin and Trotsky. True, Stalin had succeeded in exiling his nemesis in 1929, but the spirit of Trotskyism, according to Burovsky, had permeated the entire communist establishment and the Red dictator was determined to eradicate it.
The author refers to the war between the two devils as Stalin’s counter-revolution because, until Stalin undertook the great purge, the revolution and the Communist state had been overwhelmingly a Jewish enterprise with Lenin and Trotsky the leading lights. The goal of the Trotskyites, as demonstrated by the Comintern [Communist International], was to establish a permanent worldwide revolution “to fight by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and for the creation of an international Soviet Republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the state.”
By this definition, it was quite obvious that Trotsky and his cohorts were embarking upon a reckless adventure to establish a utopia based on nothing except their own fanciful dreams. To accomplish this, agents in every important country, usually citizens of those countries, either volunteered or were recruited to undermine the bourgeois government under which they lived and agitate for world revolution.
According to Burovsky, because Trotsky and a plethora of fellow Jews already held sway in the Soviet Union, many of their coreligionists in the free world both openly (when possible) and secretly (if not possible) admired the accomplishment of their fellow Jews and lent their services in the establishment of the proletarian utopia. (…)
For Burovsky and many outsiders, the internal political wars within the Soviet Union seemed more like the falling out of a gang of thieves who had stolen the Russian Empire and who were now fighting over the spoils. And thieves they were. Having first hijacked the country and then looted the Russian banks and citizens of their wealth, Lenin, Trotsky, Radek, Kollontai, Dzerzhinsky, and a host of other non-Russians accumulated fortunes. Only Stalin refrained. Like Hitler, his future nemesis, Stalin lived quite modestly. The new Communist elite, however, lived exceedingly well, frequenting the elegant shops and government offices along Arbat Street, the Fifth Avenue of Moscow, where very few native Russians could afford to visit. (…)
Stalin, aside from his determination to eliminate any possible threat to his sole leadership, also feared that the Trotskyite approach would endanger Communism by alerting the capitalist countries to the threat it represented. Instead, he thought it would be much more prudent to first establish communism in Russia, protect and nurture it, and during this incubation period build the most powerful armed forces in the world ready to pounce on and take the countries of Europe at the most opportune time, namely, when the capitalist states were exhausted from the inevitable next world war. He therefore sought to remove all Trotskyite-infected and other potentially dangerous elements from the Soviet State in a major purge before that war occurred. This, according to Professor Burovsky, was the main reason for Stalin’s Purge of 1937 and 1938.
For Professor Burovsky the unending bitter political squabbles following the revolution were evidence that the Civil War waged between the White and Red Russians (1918–1922), between the former rulers and the usurpers, was simply followed by an internal civil war between communistic internationalist intellectuals who viewed the whole world as their oyster (Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and the rest) and the more conservative, nationalistic Stalinists who favored stability. (…)
To be sure, Jews were prominent in both factions, but Stalin insisted their loyalty be directed exclusively to his concept of a “socialist” Soviet Union while their own interests and unrealistic goals be set aside. When, in his eyes, they did not comply, he had them killed.
Burovsky describes how the crimes committed by the usurpers of power in Russia far exceeded anything known to date, including even the French Revolution. During the usurpation of power in the revolution, no fewer than two million met their death. In the continuing period of the internal civil war, Burovsky estimates, 9–13 million eventually lost their lives. However, the crimes of the Lenin-Trotsky faction were either glossed over or simply not mentioned in the press or on the radio, while the Western media concentrated on and exaggerated those committed by Stalin during the “Great Purge.” Whereas the French Revolution had pitted Frenchmen against Frenchmen, and the American Revolution, Englishmen against Englishmen, the so-called Russian Revolution was entirely different. This was a case of minorities, mostly Jews, in the Empire usurping power from the majority Russians and destroying previously existing Russian elites.
According to Burovsky, the Leninists and Trotskyites made no secret of their intent to create a new world on the ashes of the old. In their anthem, The Song of the Destroyers, they sing:
We shall burn everything, we shall destroy everything,
We shall wipe everything from the face of the Earth,
We shall extinguish the old Sun,
We shall ignite a new Sun. (p. 155)
Lenin and Trotsky, Burovsky maintains, invented and practiced genocide freely in what they termed the “zoological milieu”, i.e., the Russian people, ruthlessly murdering entire layers of Russian society. As soon as members of the former ruling class (high government officials, generals, intellectuals, clergy, etc.) were eliminated, their positions were filled with Jewish revolutionaries. The children of the former upper classes were forbidden to attend the best schools and universities; only the children of the revolutionaries were granted access. According to Jewish World, 1939, Jews, representing 1.8% of the total population, constituted 20% of the students in higher institutes of learning in the USSR in 1939.[4] (p. 230)
The destruction of Christian civilization was high on Lenin and Trotsky’s hit list. All displays of Christian belief were outlawed. Churches were first looted of their art treasures and then converted into warehouses, theaters, recreation centers, and worse. Priests, nuns, and all other officers of the Church were either murdered or sent to the GULAG. Celebrations of Christmas, Easter, and Holy Days were forbidden. The icon corner in most Russian homes was banned. Because Jews were prominent among the new rulers and enforcers, all acts of anti-Semitism were made punishable by death. In a speech Trotsky announced the unveiling of the first statue in the world of Judas Iscariot, a man, the Communist leader said, who understood that Christianity was a phony religion and had the courage to break the bonds that bound him to it. Similar statues appeared in other cities. The people, however, could not protest because of the laws against anti-Semitism.
Burovsky proceeds to describe how the revolutionaries tried to gradually replace the civilization achieved in Russia under the Orthodox Church and the Czars with something entirely alien to the native people. Under the Czars Russia gave the world Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, and other giants of literature. By way of contrast, the Communist regime produced a bevy of poets and short story writers. Burovsky singles out Osip Mandelshtam, Yevgenia Ginzburg, and Isaak Babel, who lent their services to the new regime. Mandelshtam, who was a friend of Bukharin, had worked in the ministry of education of the new regime. Babel had actually served in the Jewish-dominated Cheka for many years and wrote almost autobiographically about his experiences in his stories. He was also the mentor of Ilya Ehrenburg, World War II’s most notorious propagandist. Both enjoyed life and indulged in the pleasures of the Arbat. Both were executed in Stalin’s 1937 counter-revolution. Burovsky and the mass of Russian people would maintain that they got what they deserved.
Under the Czars and the Orthodox Church Russia gave the world the paintings of Repin, Rublov, and other such immortals. The Communist regime, on the other hand, introduced abstract “art” produced by such worthies as Kandinsky, Malevich, Altman, Chagall, Shterenburg, and other such. Again, Stalin, like Hitler, preferred socialist realism in art. Whatever the objective merits of the works produced by the artists and literary figures in the early Soviet Union, they reflected the Jewish, not the Russian spirit.
Proceeding then to Stalin’s purge of the Red Army leadership and the NKVD, Burovsky finds much to be applauded. Although Generals Zhukov and Rokossovsky believed that Stalin’s purge had broken the spine of the Red Army and was responsible for the losses in the first years of World War II, Burovsky leans more to the views expressed by Viktor Suvorov in his book The Purge,[5] namely that the purge or cleansing actually improved the Red Army by removing toxic and incompetent elements. Moreover, Trotsky, as first head of the Army and Navy, had appointed many of the top military leaders. Obviously, Stalin considered them tainted and their loyalty to him questionable.[6]
Stalin purged the organs of State security (Cheka, NKVD), notoriously Jewish strongholds, with a particularly heavy and rough brush. According to Burovsky, about 20,000 members of these organs were purged, including almost all the leaders of the Dzerzhinski era: A. Kh. Artuzov, G. I. Boky, M. Ya. Latsis, M. S. Kedrov, V. N. Mantsev, G. S. Moroz, I. P. Pavlunovsky, Ya. Kh. Peters, M. A. Trilisser, I. S. Unshlikht, and V. V. Fomin. Of this Burovsky comments: “It would be difficult to imagine a more repulsive, criminal, and dangerous group of people.” (Diky, p. 240) (…)
As for the crimes attributed to and indeed committed by Stalin, author Burovsky contends that had any of his political adversaries achieved total power, the crime levels would have even been higher. After all, it was Lenin and Trotsky, not Stalin, who laid the cruel and bloody foundations of Communist rule in Russia. The secret police organization, the Cheka, the predecessor and model for the later NKVD and sister agencies, were established in December 1917, as was the GULAG. Literally, armies of secret police ensured that the GULAG would not want for slave labor. In 1919, at the onset of the Civil War (1917–1922) Trotsky was made Peoples Commissar of Army and Navy, head of the Red Army. For a decade in that and other high posts Trotsky was in a prime position to fill the armed forces and government with his own people, mostly Jews, often despite Stalin’s disapproval. During the same period Stalin by virtue of his position as Party Secretary, a less prominent but equally important position, had also been putting his own people in critical posts. In 1929, after Lenin’s death, Stalin finally succeeded in exiling Trotsky, but the shadow of his competitor for leadership lingered on in the persons and policies of the government. Thus, the Communist Party and state in the late 1930s still remained, as most objective observers noted, essentially Jewish.
For example, in 1937 almost without exception the plenipotentiaries (ambassadors) of the Soviet Union to the rest of the world were Jews: Maisky in England, Surits in France, Yurenev in Germany, Shtein in Italy, and Rubinin in Belgium. The Soviet Delegates to the League of Nations were with one exception Jews: Finkelshtein-Litvinov, Rozenberg, Shtein, Markus, Brenner, Girshfeld, Galfand, and Svanidze who was Georgian. Litvinov was also head of the Commissariat of Foreign Affairs. (Diky, p. 222)
At the time of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), the Soviet Ambassador was Marcel Rozenberg; the military attaché was Lvovich (pseudonym Loti). The Red Army officers commanding the international brigades were: Division Commander Lazar Shtein (Emil Kleber); other Jewish commanders were Grigori Shtein (Grigorovich), Corps CommanderYakov Smushkevich (Duglas), Red Army General Batkin (Fritz), and others. Abram Slutsky (Chernigovsky), head of the Soviet Foreign Intelligence Service, NKVD, also came and joined with resident NKVD agent General Aleksandr Orlov who supervised a private jail in Alkalade. (Diky, p. 223)
Despite Stalin’s purges, there were three million Jews living in the Soviet Union in 1939. By early 1941, following the division of Poland and pursuant to population-transfer provisions of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, there were 5.4 million Jews inside the USSR. Operation Barbarossa, the German attack on Russia occurred on 22 June 1941 when half the Jews in Poland were under the protection of the Red Army.
Burovsky notes that the end goal of both devils, Stalin and Trotsky, was the same — world communism, but the means chosen by Trotsky to achieve it would have caused worldwide mayhem and countless millions more deaths. It was not long after the purge that Stalin succeeded in having Trotsky himself murdered in 1940 in Mexico by which time war had already broken out in Europe. In the same year of 1940 the Anti-Comintern Pact was signed by a dozen nations with the statement,

recognizing that the aim of the Communist International, known as the Comintern [Trotsky’s organization] is to disintegrate and subdue existing states by all means at its command; convinced that the toleration of interference by the Communist International in the internal affairs of the nations not only endangers their internal peace and social well-being, but is also a menace to the peace of the world desirous of co-operating in the defense against Communist subversive activities.

Countries signing the Pact were: Germany, Japan, China (Nanjing), Italy, Denmark, Finland, Spain, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Croatia, and Turkey.
The United States, Great Britain, and France abstained from and even objected to the Pact, believing (or saying they believed) Germany to be the greatest threat. The line between the Axis powers and the Western Allies in World War II was thereby drawn. It would take the West fifty years to correct this mistake.
Soon after World War II and the founding of the state of Israel, Stalin, following a policy of Russification and rejuvenation of the victorious Communist State, attempted once again to reduce the number and power of Jews in the Soviet Union. To this end, he planned another purge, one that would necessarily involve many of his old Jewish comrades. Before he could implement his plan, he was dead. Officially the Soviet leader was reported to have died a natural death, but many speculate that he was killed by the people he had planned to kill.[8]
The devil’s advocate, author Burovsky, rests his case in the defense of Stalin with the words:

Of course Stalin’s regime was awful! But in politics it is very often necessary to choose, not between the good and the better, but between the bad and the worse. The alternatives to Stalin would have been even worse nightmares.…The entire history of the USSR may be seen as an attempt to establish a utopia, and the civil war as the rejection of the utopia by the people.… Like Mandelshtam and Ginzburg, the “children of the Arbat” had not the slightest reason to repent; nor the slightest interest in whom they destroyed…. It is a pity that Stalin did not have another 10 years of life in which to say, like Napoleon, “the revolution is over”, but we can be especially grateful that Stalin killed the revolutionary bastards, the foul-smelling fungi that accumulated on Arbat Street and that he prevented the fungus from spreading to the rest of  Russia and the world. That which has gone down in history as “1937” was in fact the most brilliant and glorious event in the Stalin era. Farewell Comrade Stalin! Thank you! (Burovsky, pp. 280,  284–285)

The verdict for Stalin, according to Professor Burovsky, must be “not guilty” because of mitigating circumstances. The events and crimes so described and attributed to Stalin must be seen as simply ugly episodes of ongoing criminal violence perpetrated by one gangster against another.

[1] “Glorious 1937!”, Zavtra, 9 September 1997. The Russian national heroes are: General Aleksandr Suvorov, General Mikhail Kutuzov, Admiral Pavel Nakhimov, and Admiral Fyodor Ushakov. The Knight in the Tiger’s skin is Prince Tariel of India, from the famous Georgian poem Vephkhviskhaosani. [4] Andrei Diky. 200 Years Together: Jews in Russia and the USSR. Algoritm Publishing, Moscow, 2010, 320 p.
[5] Suvorov uses the Russian word ischishchenie instead of the usual chistka for “purge.” The former has more the meaning of “cleansing” or the removal of toxic, dangerous elements; the later has more the meaning of total housecleaning. Robert Conquest preferred to use the expression The Great Terror rather than The Great Purge. Like so many of his contemporaries at Oxford, Conquest himself joined the Communist Party in “glorious 1937.”
[6] Dan Michaels. Stalin’s 1937 Purge of the Red Army. The Barnes Review, No. 3, 2000, pp. 49-55.
[8] Dan Michaels [aka as Robert Logan]. Was Stalin Assassinated? The Barnes Review, No. 4, 2003, pp. 35-40.

Extrait de The Judas Goats — The Enemy Within par Michael Collins Piper (p.148-154):

On September 15, 1969, writing in the popular American nationalist newspaper, Common Sense, which had, over the years, frequently featured the works of outspoken Jewish-born American anti-Zionist spokesman Benjamin Freedman, one Morris Horton (under his pen name “Fred Farrell”) wrote a fascinating assessment of the reality of Trotskyite Communism. Horton wrote in part:
Originally “Communism” was nothing but a tool of the wealthy American Jews of New York. In the United States, and in much of the rest of the world, it is still just that. Let us now address ourselves to a question important to anyone who really wants to understand Communism: “What is the difference between a Stalinist and a Trotskyite? Some people will tell you:“All Communists are alike.”
This is a dangerous piece of shallow misinformation. It is acceptable only if you are willing to substitute shallow sloganeering for real knowledge. A Stalinist represents primordial Russian nationalism. A Trotskyite represents the Jewish interests of New York City. The Jewish interests of New York suffered a terrific setback one day many years ago, when a taciturn hood planted an ax in Leon Trotsky’s skull in a villa in Mexico.
The world Communist conspiracy is not a Russian conspiracy; it is an American Jewish conspiracy. Today it is falling into great disrepute around the world. America is being blamed for supporting communism around the world.
Unhappily, the charge is true. New York is the real hub of the conspiracy. If some of our Anti-Communists would stand up four square and tell this plain truth, we might possibly yet be liberated from Jewish misrule.
Few of them ever do. Most of the Communists and many of the Anti-Communists are on the same payroll, the Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other. The first basic rule of this sham battle is:“Never drag any real truth into the matter on either side; tell anything else you want to tell, but never tell the truth.” This is the basic background of most of the phony “experts” on Communism who have been “experting” about it for forty years and haven’t made a dent in it.
Horton was particularly adamant in pointing out that the American “anti-Communist” movement was increasingly falling into the hands of very real Communists—the Trotskyites—who in the guise of “fighting Communism” were actually working to introduce it into the American system. This is a point that few anti-communists understood then and even today they find it difficult to digest. Horton wrote:
These people generate the literature on Communism that is generally available to the American public. They have
no interest in providing any genuinely valid information. Their aim is to manipulate public opinion.
Therefore, they seek to divide the Gentile. They seek to make the middle class believe that the working class is allied to Red Russia; All of this is, and always was, pure hallucination, generated by Jewish intellectual quacks in order to promote a minority tyranny over the American Majority.
In his essay, Horton emphasized that the age-old labels of “Right” and “Left” no longer had any real meaning—a point that even many legitimate and self-styled modern-day American “conservatives” of the 21st century have yet to realize:

There is no genuine validity in either the “Right” or “Left” positions in politics.These are artificial, Jew-invented positions. Jewish control of communications is absolutely essential to the success of this power system. Jewish political quackery would not long survive exposure.
The Right-Left Age is the Jewish Age, and it is an age which, on the world stage, is now receding into the past. If America continues to live in this Jewish past, then America has no future.

Horton’s words—written nearly 50 years ago—continue to reverberate. But to drive home the point further, it is worth reviewing a translation of an analysis of Zionism published in Spanish in the November 4, 1979 edition of Granma, the official newspaper voice of the communist regime of Cuba’s Fidel Castro.
(Similar versions of this had previously appeared in the Soviet Union, at a time when there were increasing public noises against Zionism, much to the dismay of the American Trotskyites who were then reinventing themselves as “the neo-conservatives.”)
While this analysis from the communist point of view has been superceded by the collapse of the Soviet empire as it existed when this document was first published, it contains fascinating insights into the sources of tension between Zionism and Communism.
The Zionist movement, created by the Jewish big bourgeoisie at the end of the 19th century, was born with a decidedly counterrevolutionary purpose. From the founding of the World Zionist Organization in 1897 to the present, Zionism, as ideology and political practice, has opposed the world revolutionary process.
Zionism is counterrevolutionary in a global sense in that it acts the world over against the three major forces of revolution: the socialist community, the working class movement in capitalist countries and the movement for national liberation.
Zionist counterrevolution began by making inroads in the European working class movement. In the early years, when the growth of monopoly capitalism and the expansion of reactionary tendencies that accompanied the establishment of the imperialist phase of capitalism demanded the unity and solidarity of the proletariat, the Zionists focused on dividing the working class.
They propagated the thesis that all non-Jews were, and would always be, anti-Semites; asserted that the only possibility for the Jewish masses’ well-being and justice was to emigrate to the “promised land”; and defended class collaboration, thus diverting the Jewish proletariat away from the struggle for their real emancipation and dividing and weakening the working class movement. It’s not fortuitous that in czarist police archives one finds documents calling for support for the Zionist movement as a way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution.
Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote at the time in his diary:“All our youth; all those who are from 20 to 30 years old, will abandon their obscure socialist tendencies and come over to me.”
However, the efforts of Zionist counter-revolution could not hold back the wheels of history.The victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia ushered in a period of transition from capitalism to socialism on a world scale. The first victory of the proletariat, the premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.
Most of the money that filled Zionist coffers came from Russia, where czarism had humiliated and oppressed the Jews for centuries. Russia provided a million immigrants for the Zionist colonization of Palestine. When the Russian Revolution liquidated the exploitation of man by man, it also destroyed the basis for Zionism in the Soviet Union.
Leninist policy on the national question toppled all Zionist myths that the Jews could not be fully incorporated, with equal rights, into society and destroyed all the racist claims on the inevitability of anti-Semitism. The Zionists never did, and never will, forgive the Soviet state and its Leninist Party, not so much for cutting off the money flow from Russia and for the loss of workers for the colonization effort, but because the Bolsheviks implemented a correct policy that incorporated the talents and efforts of the Soviet Jews into the tasks of building a new society and thus demonstrated the class origins of discrimination and anti-Semitism, breaking with the past and providing a genuine solution to the Jewish problem, a solution which was not and could never be a massive exodus to Palestine.
Zionist counterrevolution took on an anti-Soviet thrust. Before October 1917 the Zionists collaborated with Kerensky. Later they supported all the attempts at counter-revolution and enthusiastically participated in the different white “governments” set up in different parts of the country during the Civil War [in Russia].They were active in all the moves against the Soviet Union from abroad, and their powerful propaganda machine spread a spate of lies about the first workers’ and peasants’ state in the world.
Not even the Soviet victory over German fascism, which saved so many Jewish lives, made the Zionists change their anti-Soviet stand.
With the outbreak of the cold war the Zionists collaborated in all the subversive and diversionary activities against the USSR and other socialist countries. The secret services of the Zionist state of Israel coordinated their spy activities with the CIA. Zionist agents played an active role in the counter-revolutionary attempts in Hungary and Czechoslovakia.
Today Zionism seconds the hypocritical anti-Soviet campaign on presumed violations of the human rights of Jews in the Soviet Union and does all it can to put pressure on Soviet citizens of Jewish origin so they will leave their true homeland and go to Israel.This effort by Zionist counter-revolution can only lead to new failures. And to complete the picture there is the Zionist counter-revolutionary action against the national liberation movements.
Soon after World War I, Zionist settlers penetrated into Palestinian territory, acting as the spearhead of British imperialist interests in opposition to the Arab peoples’ hopes for independence. Their role was clearly spelled out by the prominent Zionist leader Max Nordau in a statement to the British authorities:
“We know what you want from us: that we defend the Suez Canal.We must defend your route to India which passes through the Middle East.We are ready to take on that difficult task. But you must allow us to become powerful enough to carry out that task.”
And, as a matter of fact, the Zionists became a power and succeeded in establishing their own state in 1948: the Zionist state of Israel. Now their task is to defend oil routes, protect all the interests of U.S. imperialism and block the advance of the Arab revolution.
Backed by tremendous amounts of imperialist economic and military aid, the Zionists are constantly acting against national liberation movements.
At one time it was their mission to penetrate African and Asian independence movements, guarantee that the newly independent states followed paths acceptable to imperialism, that they not stray from the confines of neo-colonialism. Israel offered courses, advisers, all sorts of aid.
But the ploy wasn’t very successful. Israel’s increasing role as imperialism’s policeman in the Middle East, its racism and avowed expansionism made the young African and Asian nations see the dangers of Israeli “aid,”the treachery of Israeli foreign policy.
Nevertheless, the Zionist state took up a new role in the struggle of world reaction against progress. It went beyond the geographical confines of the Middle East, established friendly ties with all reactionary regimes and began to supply arms, equipment and advisers to those who were trying to suppress national liberation struggles.
The Israeli armaments industry specialized in designing and producing all sorts of weapons for urban and rural anti-guerrilla warfare.
The South African racist regime, the dictatorships of Guatemala and El Salvador, and the fascist Pinochet are among the best clients of the Israeli armaments industry.
Israeli arms sales in 1978 were estimated at $400 million.
One of their best clients was the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.
Zionist counter-revolution was present in Somoza’s Nicaragua in the form of Galil guns and Pull-push planes, but they couldn’t stop the victory of the Sandinista revolutionaries.
This is a symbol of our times: neither the machinations of Zionist counterrevolution, nor Israeli arms, can hold back the victorious march of the peoples of the world.



This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.