Revenge of the Neanderthal

“More on the Khazar Theory”: Koestler Admitted He Wrote His Book to Further Jewish Interests Koestler admet avoir pondu son livre sur les Khazars pour servir les intérêts juifs. En « démontrant » que les Khazars n’ont pas le droit de retourner en Israël parce qu’ils viennent en fait du Caucase et n’ont aucun lien avec la population indigène palestinienne et juive (sémite), il soutient indirectement le « droit » des juifs sémites de retourner en Israël! Quelle arnaque. Ça prenait un juif sioniste pour inventer ça. (Vous ignorez pas que Koestler était non seulement juif mais sioniste?)

Rethinking the Khazar Theory by Dr. David Duke



by Michael Collins Piper
« …It is probably not a gamble to say that this 114th issue may be our most « controversial » –perhaps even more so than our famous « All Holocaust » issue which has been distributed to the tune of more than 100,000 copies since first published in January/February 2001…

The Jewish people have been banished from a vast array of civilized nations at one time or another. . . .
By Willis Carto
An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is anything but true. . . .
By Willis Carto
Christ’s ethnic antecedents are not necessarily Hebrews.
By Willis Carto
The Jewish religion has played a major part in shaping the Jewish people. . . .
The leading force behind anti-Catholic bigotry in America was the first Jewish member of Congress. . . .
By Willis Carto
Few people realize that one of Judaism’s foremost holidays celebrates the slaughter of 75,000 human beings. . . .
By Willis Carto
The foremost Jewish religious teachings preach—even demand—hatred of Jesus Christ. . . .
By Willis Carto
There’s an ugly history of Jewish attempts to wipe out the vestiges of Christianity in the Holy Land. . . .
By Willis Carto
The Jewish people consider Israel’s atomic weapon to be “holy.” But will it end up destroying mankind? . . .
By Willis Carto
The goyim—then as now—were/are held in contempt. . . .
By Willis Carto
Despite all the misinformation, there’s a solid history of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and from whence they came. . . .
By John Tiffany
Contemporary data indicates that racism and discrimination and hatred of the worst sort runs rampant in Israel. . . .
By Michael Collins Piper
Although Jewish people complain about Christianity and Islam being religions of hatred, a critical examination of Judaism itself is quite revealing. . . .
A famous Jewish author and philosopher examines the frictions between Jews and non-Jews. . .
Introduction by Willis Carto; Text consists of first two thirds of Chapter Two, « The Jewish Utopia: The New World Order » from The New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper.
Jewish scholars proclaim a future New World Order in which the Jewish people will reign supreme. Will they?
ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM 48 [Link to same text at the web site of British historian David Irving’s here]
By Winston Churchill
The British statesman saw a struggle on the world stage as a conflict between Jewish Zionism and Jewish Bolshevism.
By Marine Marynova
The royal family of Russia were perhaps the first most prominent victims of Jewish Bolshevism. Here’s the sad story of their brutal murders. . . .
By Eustace Mullins
By Michael Collins Piper

Inside Illustration Art:
Artist Concept of a 20th Century Neanderthal
Short URL for this web page:
by Willis A. Carto
Editor and Publisher
The Barnes Review
(…)For almost a thousand years in the West, since A.D. 1012, when they were expelled from Mainz, Jews have proven themselves to be bad neighbors. In 1649 Oliver Cromwell obtained backing from the British Parliament for the execution of King Charles I on a charge of treason. Afterward, Cromwell permitted the Jews to enter England again, effectively reversing the edict of expulsion issued by King Edward I in 1290, which expelled all Jews from England « forever » and ordered that any who remained were to be executed.
In addition to the common complaint of usury, accusations of ritual murder of Christian children usually motivated the expulsions. England is not the first country to expel Jews.

A partial list of all the areas from which the Jews have been banished, sometimes on numerous occasions, over the last 998 years is lengthy. The list includes Mainz (four times), France (four times), Upper Bavaria (twice), England, Saxony, Hungary (twice), Belgium, Slovakia (twice), Austria, Lyon, Cologne, Netherlands, Brandenburg (twice), Warsaw, Spain, Italy (twice), Lithuania, Portugal, Naples (three times), Navarre, Nuremburg, Prussia, Genoa, Prague, Bavaria, the Papal States, Hamburg, Vienna, Moravia, Bohemia and Moscow. (A chart of these states/municipalities with the year of expulsion is found at left.)
Partial List of Cities/States that
have expelled Jews — 1012-1933
Country Year Country Year Country Year
Mainz 1012 Upper Bavaria 1442 Naples 1533
France 1182 Netherlands 1444 Italy 1540
Upper Bavaria 1276 Brandenburg 1446 Naples 1541
England 1290 Mainz 1462 Prague 1541
France 1306 Mainz 1483 Genoa 1550
France 1322 Warsaw 1483 Bavaria 1551
Saxony 1349 Spain 1492 Prague 1557
Hungary 1360 Italy 1492 Papal States 1569
Belgium 1370 Lithuania 1495 Hungary 1582
Slovakia 1380 Portugal 1496 Hamburg 1649
France 1394 Naples 1496 Vienna 1669
Austria 1420 Navarre 1498 Slovakia 1744
Lyons 1420 Nuremburg 1498 Moravia 1744
Cologne 1424 Brandenburg 1510 Bohemia 1744
Mainz 1438 Prussia 1510 Moscow 1891
Augsburg 1438 Genoa 1515 Germany 1933
Wasted and exhausted by inter-Aryan wars, for the most part fomented or aggravated by Neanderthal/Jewish political and economic power, the outlook today is decidedly not good for the Aryan/Cro-Magnon.
World War I was so named after American intervention into the European war that began in 1914. This stupid bloodbath would have remained inter-European had the British not issued the Balfour Declaration on Nov. 2, 1917, which read:
His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of that object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
The history of this calamitous outrage, which has brought on so much suffering for the world, the effects of which will curse history forever, has been given by many of the principals involved, particularly James Malcolm, the non-Jewish conceptor of it whose 12-page account of it was printed in the January/February 2000 issue of THE BARNES REVIEW history magazine on pages 20-31.
The purpose of this declaration, issued to American Jews, was to inspire them to use their influence in the banking, commercial, intellectual, news media and political fields to bring America into the war on the side of England. Until then American Jews generally favored Germany because of the Jews’ history of profitable relations with the Germans.
The scheme worked and this is why the American Congress declared war on the Central Powers on April 6, 1917, the excuse being that German subs were sinking American ships carrying war materiel to Britain, which, by the way, the Germans had every right to do under then-prevailing American « neutrality » laws, specifically Article V of the Act of June 15, 1917 providing that during a war in which the United States is neutral, it is unlawful to send out of the jurisdiction of the United States any vessel armed or equipped as a vessel of war with any intent or with reasonable cause to believe that it shall be used by any belligerent nation. The German government even placed an ad in The New York Times on April 22, 1915, warning prospective passengers that because the Lusitania would be carrying contraband of war, it would be sunk.
In that war, 116,516 Americans were killed and 204,002 wounded. Of these, fewer than 2 percent were Jewish.
Although the beloved author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, was a firm advocate for religious liberty in America for Jews and all people, what has been carefully censored from the history books is the absolute fact that Jefferson clearly considered the Jewish religion itself to be quite abominable.
Writing to John Adams on Oct. 13, 1813, the widely read intellectual commented on the Talmud and other Jewish teachings: « What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed before such corrupt maxims could have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral doctrine. »
Describing himself as « a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus, » Jefferson wrote to William Short (on Oct. 31, 1819) that he considered Jesus « the greatest of all the reformers of the depraved religion of his own country, » adding in a subsequent letter to Short (Aug. 4, 1820) that while Christ preached « philanthropy and universal charity and benevolence, » the Jews followed teachings that instilled in them « the most anti-social spirit towards other nations. »
Jefferson wrote that Jesus — as a « reformer of the superstitions of a nation, » was in an « ever dangerous » position by opposing « the priests of the superstition » — the Pharisees — whom he described as « a blood thirsty race … cruel and remorseless as the Being whom they represented as the family God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob, and the local God ofIsrael. »
As for the European war that followed 20 years later, the United States intervened following the « Jewish sacred declaration of war » against Germany made by Samuel Untermeyer’s World Jewish Congress on August 6, 1933 and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor — an attack documented by Revisionist historians as contrived by Roosevelt and Churchill for the purpose of convincing the American people that they had no choice but to go to war once again. American intervention made this European war again a world war. 407,296 white American men died and over 1 million were wounded, perhaps a third of them horribly, to exist shut away in attics in beds or, if fortunate, in wheelchairs for the rest of their miserable lives. Again, fewer than 2 percent were Jewish. The war also brought vast profits for capitalists and bankers and horrific debt for the taxpayers, which they will be paying until the final collapse of the dollar, an event anticipated shortly, if many private economists are to be believed.



 There are upwards of 8,000 Karaites in Israel, with 2,000 or more elsewhere. They demand their own courts in Israel with jurisdiction in matters of the personal status of members of their community.
Karaites broke away from the mainstream of Judaism in the 8th century when they denied the authority of the oral law, as codified in the Talmud. Rabbinical Jews consider them mamzerin, or illegal bastards. Karaites consider other Jews illegitimate bastards.

Another of the many sects of Jews is the Lubavitch-Chabad section of Hassidlc Jewry located in Crown Heights, New York City. Guided by the will of the late Chief Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, work is simultaneously in progress on a $5 million boys school and a $15 million girls school.
It is funded in part by Joseph Gruss, a Wall Street investment banker, Ronald Perleman, chairman of Revlon, and David Chase, of Chase Enterprises.
The Lubavitchers count their numbers at around 200,000 with 3,000 colonies worldwide in 70 countries. A prime object of this sect is to double their numbers every decade. If they do, there will be one billion of them in 130 years. One of the inventions they boast of is the contraceptive coil, for use by White Christian women only. Through their eyes, the gentile is bumbler, fool, amateur and idiot as he consumes the Jewish export doctrine of hedonism. Their racial loyalty, says Bill White, exists only to bring ugliness and pain to mankind, not to create and better the condition of men, which has always been the purpose of Aryan science and religion.
By almost every measure, the state of Israel is unique among nations. It was created and exists only by the influence of co-religionists in other countries who, through the manipulation of money and political power, can induce other countries to support it financially and in a myriad of other ways. It is exempt from arms limitations imposed on every other nation boasting nuclear weapons because it has not agreed to any international non-proliferation agreements, nor are there any discernable efforts of Aryan states to force it to abide by any international rule of law, which has been a goal of European nations since the nettlesome Jewish state was created out of Arab lands back in 1947-1948.
The Christian Science Monitor estimates that American taxpayers and kindly bankers have gifted Israel from 1949 to 2009 some $133 billion. It built its nuclear armory by stealing the secrets from other countries, including the U.S., England, France and Russia and has gotten away with it scot-free. A proxy, the American government, coerced Germany into building two nuclear-armed submarines of the latest design for its navy. It violates the Genocide Convention (which Jews lobbied for intensely for during the Senate’s ratification process) daily in its barbaric treatment of Palestinians within and without its borders without any comment by the so-called « free press » in the West.
An attractive California blonde peace activist, Rachel Corrie, was deliberately murdered on March 16, 2003 by an Israeli bulldozer operator (the bulldozer was built by the American Caterpillar Co., and no doubt supplied free by American taxpayers) while she was trying to stop the demolition of a Palestinian home with scarcely a murmur from the American press. Israelis openly state their intention to expand Israel’s territory by taking territory from other countries and Israel literally dictated « American » foreign policy to the Bush administration, which obediently pirouetted as ordered by the « neo-cons, » a name now used by former Jewish communists.
Fortunately the Bush administration did not attack Iran, as the Jewish lobby ardently desired. There is a hidden story here, which has to do with the strong opposition of the American military hierarchy to such an attack, which could only have constituted the biggest and most expensive no-win war in this country’s history.
Israel, which has no extradition treaties with gentile nations, is a haven for Jewish criminals, including murderers from anywhere since all Jews are dual citizens of the country in which they live and Israel. One notorious example of this travesty is the gruesome murder of 17-year-old Alfredo Tello, of Silver Spring, Md. on Sept. 17, 1997 by Samuel Sheinbein. Tello was first strangled and beaten on the head with a shotgun. His limbs were sawed off — they were never found — and his torso was burned. Sheinbein and an accomplice, Aaron Needle, called their parents saying they were in trouble and needed money to flee to Israel. Sheinbein’s parents immediately picked up their son and drove him to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, gave him a one-way ticket to Israel and saw him off. Needle — also Jewish but less lucky — was arrested and two days before his trial either hanged himself or was murdered in his cell. Needless to say, his death was not investigated.
Israeli authorities refuse to return Sheinbein and sentenced him to 24 years after he pled guilty. However, his furloughs from jail are frequent. He was eligible for parole in four years. Says Montgomery County prosecuting attorney, John McCarthy, the possibility that Sheinbein might soon be back on the streets is « terrifying. » But this is improbable. Sheinbein is clearly good material for the Israeli army and would enjoy exercising his sadism on Palestinians.

Please see sidebar article « Jewish Scholars Says: `We Were Invented‘ » which starts as follows:
« A Jewish scholar, Shlomo Sand, a teacher of contemporary history at the University of Tel Aviv in Israel, rocked Israel with his best-selling Hebrew-language book, The Invention of the Jewish People, which is now available in English in mainstream U.S. bookstores.
« Sand’s book is so powerful and provocative in that it demonstrates that virtually everything we think we know about the history of the Jews may just not be true… »

And there is no use denying the primary role of Jews in communism — that hellish system under which at least 40 (forty) million human beings in the Soviet Union were killed by starvation, hanging, shooting, burying, drowning, slicing or other means. This is the total arrived at by The Black Book of Communism and to which Alexander
Solzhenitsyn agrees.
Had it not have been for Germany’s invasion of the USSR on June 22, 1941, the Soviet system of terror and slavery would have been extended at least to the Pyrenees and the Atlantic Ocean, if not to Gibraltar and Galway. This is more than alarmist and unschooled conjecture; it is clear fact as developed by the works of numerous Revisionist historians who are free of leftist academic bias. The list includes Viktor Suvorov’s Icebreaker and more recent The Chief Culprit, historian Joachim Hoffman’s Stalin s War of Extermination, and numerous others, including David Irving.
Even Winston Churchill, before he was compromised by the money of Jewish Henry Strakosh, specifically placed the responsibility for communism on Jewish shoulders. See his famous article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, carried on Feb. 8, 1920. [See page 48 of this issue of TBR.-Ed.]
But an environment of democracy is surely preferred. No wonder that the Jewish plaything, President George W Bush, worked to see « democracy » installed everywhere and his father openly promoted a « new world order » which necessarily involves the surrender of fundamental American sovereignty.
Using the framework of democracy, the Jews have fashioned the perfect political system — perfect for those who run it, if not for the people — whereby those who have the real power and authority do not have the responsibility therefor. Thus, as the country and indeed, the entire West, crumble into dust, with confusion, misdirection, alarums and wrongheadedness at every turn, the Jews prosper. Democratic politicians are like colored light bulbs: they burn for awhile and are soon replaced by another of slightly different color. Democracy is securely in the thrall of money and the master of money is the Rothschild entity and its allies, including many gentile supercapitalists.
The key to Jewish control is compound interest, the eighth wonder of the world. One cent loaned at 1 percent compound interest at the time of Christ would today amount to the worth of a gold ball the size of the Earth, worth $2 quindecillion — that’s a « 2 » with 48 zeroes.
As noted, Jews avoid participation in the wars they instigate. Wars between goyini are extremely profitable. Although avoiding getting involved in shooting wars Jews/Neanderthals are exceptionally combative and aggressive in forcing their ideas and group interests upon their host peoples.
Jews and Judeophiles glory in the idea that Jews have created Christianity for others. Preachers, such as John Hagee, known to many as the corpulent con man, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell have had the golden gates of the television medium opened to them and have made fortunes by literally worshipping Jews.
It is not an exaggeration to state that « the Holocaust » is a new religion. Using the « Holocaust » image, many billions of dollars have poured into Jewish coffers. But this is not the only advantage reaped from « the Holocaust. » With due apologies, in an appendix to this essay, I shall reprint something I wrote on this subject some 30 years ago in the introduction to a little book by Dr. David Hoggan, The Myth of the Six Million:
[cliquez pour agrandir l’image – click to see larger picture]

The rare French lithographfrom the mid-1880s portrays the Jew as standing at the top of the French social, political and economic pyramid, outranking the king, the nobility, the clergy, the military, the beggars and the peasantry. (Lithograph from the private collection of Michael Collins Piper.)

« There has never been a more colossal and successful deception, nor one that has been so enormously profitable in every way for its perpetrators, than the myth that Hitler and his Nazis killed 6 million Jews. »
But, you might ask, why should one concern himself with merely one more lie — and an old one, at that — when we are lied to so many times each day by armies of advertisers, preachers, salesmen and politicians?
And the answer is that the direct effects of this myth go far beyond the fact that since the end of World War II the people of Western Germany have been forced to pay more than $10 billion to Israel and to individual Jews elsewhere as « restitution. » The answer is that the effects of this myth have a direct and an ever-increasing impact on each of us, every day.
For the truly critical effect of the myth is that it has made impossible rational and public discussion of the most vital matters, the understanding of which are central to our well-being. Take recent history, for example. There is an immutable and rigidly-fixed dogma, taught to all of the people through movies, television programs and in all of the universities of the land, that the Germans were uniquely and solely responsible for starting World War II. Thus, the unspeakably disastrous political results of that war — the rise of Communism and the destruction of Europe as a world force, as well as the nearly infinite human suffering both during and after the war: 50 million lives lost, an ultimate financial cost of $25 trillion or more — can be comfortably blamed on the Nazi devils without the pain of having to examine the possibility that Britain, America, and our « noble ally, » the Soviet Union, were not entirely blameless.
Says Israel Shamir, an outspoken Israeli Jew that has converted to Christianity:

I still remember old Jews spitting while passing by a church, and cursing while passing by a Christian cemetery. Last year in Jerusalem, a Jew decided to refresh the tradition. He spat at the Holy Cross carried in the procession in the city. Last year, the biggest Israeli tabloid Yedioth Aharonoth reprinted in its library the Jewish anti-Gospel, « Toledoth Eshu. » It is the book of hate for Christ. The hero of the book is Judas. He captures Jesus by polluting his purity. According to « Toledoth, » the conception of Christ is sin, the miracles of Jesus [are] witchcraft, his resurrection but a trick.
Even today, Jews in Israel refer to Jesus by the demeaning word « Yeshu » (instead of « Yeshua »), meaning « Perish his name. » In a similar pun, the New Testament Gospel [sic] is called Avon Gilaion, « the booklet of sin. » These are the endearing feelings that the friends of Christian Zionists maintain toward Christ.

 This circa 1900 illustration from the popular Judge magazine is entitled « The New Jerusalem — formerly New York » and portrays the growing perception at the time that Jewish people were literally invading the city (in the waves of the late 19th Century and early 20th Century immigration by Jews, overwhelmingly from Eastern Europe, and virtually establishig a stranglehold on business, finance and social affairs in that teeming metropolis.
According to the American Jewish Committee, « The Talmud is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law and it is the textbook used in the training of rabbis. »
Benjamin Freedman, a converted Jew, in his book Facts are Facts, said:
From the birth of Jesus until this day there have never been recorded more vicious and vile libelous blasphemies of Jesus, of Christians, and the Christian faith by anyone, anywhere, or anytime than you will find between the covers of the infamous « 63 books »; which are the « legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law » as well as the « textbook used in the training of Rabbis. » The explicit and implicit irreligious character and implications of the contents of the Talmud will open your eyes as they have never been opened before. The Talmud reviles Jesus, Christians and the Christian faith, the priceless spiritual and cultural heritage of Christians, as they have never been reviled before or since the Talmud was completed in the 5th century.
Mr. A.N. Field, a British-American writer of the 1930s, collected the following gems from the Talmud, which deserve a far wider circulation among non-Jews than they have received:
• Whosoever is uncircumcised belongs to the sons of Belial, to the children of doom and eternal perdition. (The Book of Jubilee, xv, 26-27.)
• The Jew is to say on Purim Day: « Cursed be Haman, blessed be Mordechai; cursed be Seresh, blessed be Esther: cursed be all non-Jews, blessed be all Jews. » (Orach Chaim, 660, 16.)
• Theft, robbery and rape of a beautiful woman and similar deeds are forbidden to every gentile toward another gentile and also toward a Jew, but they are allowed to a Jew against a non-Jew. (Sanhedrin, 57 a; also Aboda Zara, 13 b.)
• A heretic gentile you may kill outright with your own hands. (Aboda Zara, 4b.)
• Those who do not own the Torah, must all be killed. Whoever has power to kill them, let him kill them openly with the sword, if not let him use artifices until they are all done away with. (Choschen ha-Mischpat, 425, 5.)
• If a Jew has a suit with a non-Jew, you (Jewish judge) will take the Jew’s side as far as possible, according to the laws of the gentiles, you will take the Jew’s side and say to the gentile: Thus it is according to your law. If neither of these alternatives is possible, then you must cheat. (Baba Kama, 113 a.)
• It is allowed to cheat a gentile and take usury trom him. (Baba Mezia, 61 a.)
• God has commanded us to take usury trom the gentile and lend him only when he consents to repay with usury, in order that we do not create profit for him, even if there accrued no profit to us. (Sepher Mizwoth, 73 a.)
• A thing lost by a gentile may not only be kept by the man who found it, but it is even forbidden to give it back to him. (Choschen ha-Mischpat, 159, 1.)
• A Jew may rob a gentile, that is, he may cheat him over a bill if unlikely to be detected. (Choschen ha-Mischpat, 348, 1.)
The following racist quotations from the Talmud appear in reputable publications:
• You are human beings but the nations of the world are not human beings, but beasts. (Baba Mecia, 114,6.)
• On the house of the goy one looks as on a fold of cattle. (Tosefta, Erubin, viii.)
• The estates of the goy are like wilderness, who first settles in them has a right to them. (Baba Batra, 54, b.)
• The property of the goys is like a thing without a master. (Schulchan Aruch: Choschen ha-Mischpat, 156,5.)
• Who took an oath in the presence of goys, the robbers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible. (Tosefta Szebnot, 11.)
• A human form is only given to those who are not Jews in order that the Jews may not be waited upon by beasts. (Schene-tuchoth-habberith.)
• If a Jew can deceive idolaters by making them think he is a follower of their cult, it is permitted to do so. (Yore De’ah, 157,2.)
• One should and must make false oath, when the goyim ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that. (Szaalot-Utszabot. The Book of Jore Dia, 17.)
• Every goy who studies Talmud, and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die. (Sanhedrin, 59 a, Aboda Zara, 8¬6, Szagiga, 13.)
• To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all the Jews … (Book of Libbre David, 37.)
That the Talmud inculcates hatred both of Christianity and Christians, was the view ofvthe late Monsignor Jouin, founder in 1912 of the Revue lntemationale des Societes Secretes and the editor of it up to his death in 1932. Translations of articles
by Monsignor Jouin appeared in The London Free Press of September and October, 1937, and February 1938, and in these the whole matter was fully discussed with many citations.
As has been already stated, there is much controversy as to how such passages as have been cited above are regarded from the Jewish Chronicle of January 3 [1938] reporting the newly installed president of the Council of Orthodox Hebrew Congregations in London as saying « his guide would always be the Schulcan Aruch. » In Warren Weston’s book, Father of Lies, it is stated that Professor Cohen, as a sworn expert before the court at Marburg in April 1888, testified that, « the religious Jew considers himself bound by the whole contents of the Talmud. »

This grand celebration of 19th-century New York of the pivotal Jewish holiday of Purim commemorates the Old Testament’s Book of Esther, which hails the genocide of 75,000 Persians as a result of the scheming of Esther, the Jewish bride of the Persian king. No other Jewish holiday, all of which in one form or another celebrate the defeat and destruction of non-Jews, better exemplifies the venal nature of the teachings that underlie what one Jewish theologian has called « the Jewish Utopia, » which is the philosophical foundation of what some today refer to as an impending New World Order.
A further point in the Jewish religion around which much controversy has centered is the « Kol Nidre » prayer. This is recited on the day before Yom Kippur (« the Day of Atonement ») each year with great solemnity in all synagogues. (In 2010, Yom Kippur begins at sundown on Friday, September 17.) The Free Press of February 1938 published what it stated was a photostatic reproduction of the prayer in English and Hebrew from the Jewish prayer book for the Day of Atonement, published in London under the authority of the late chief rabbi of the British empire. The prayer reads as follows:
All vows, bonds, devotions, promises, obligations, penalties and oaths: wherewith we have vowed, sworn, devoted and bound ourselves: from this Day of Atonement unto to the next Day of Atonement, may it come unto us for good: lo, all these we repent us in them. They shall be absolved, released, annulled, made void and of no effect: they shall not be binding nor shall they have any power. Our vows shall not be vows: our bonds shall not be bonds: and our oaths shall not be oaths.
« There is a little-known but deep-rooted history of virulent Jewish antagonism and violence against non-Jews (Christians in particular) but many scholars have ignored the record in this regard.
Now a forthright Jewish academic, Elliot Horowitz, associate professor of Jewish History at Israel’s Bar-Han University, has come forth with a book that explores this ugly phenomenon: Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence.
This heavily-detailed, copiously-documented volume is a stunning contribution to the history of the Jewish people and their troubled relationship with « the other » — the non-Jews… »
« Scattered throughout the Talmud, the founding document of rabbinic Judaism in late antiquity, can be found quite a few references to Jesus — and they’re not flattering. The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus’ birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus’ resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell — and that a similar fate awaits his followers.
Were you shocked by these claims? Did you consider what you’ve read to be « rank anti-Semitism » or « vicious hatred »?… »
« As early as December 1955, not long after the institution of the Jewish state of Israel, Father Leonard Feeney, a Boston-based Roman Catholic clergyman, compiled the following list of Christian churches and other institutions that had been attacked or otherwise destroyed by the newly-ensconced Jewish occupation regime in the Holy Land.
In assembling this shocking list — which would come as a complete surprise to modern-day Christians who believe that Israel has been a good friend to Christians in the Holy Land — Father Feeney noted that his list did not include the loss in lives and property suffered by the nearly one million Arabs (Christian and Muslim alike) who had been evicted from their ancient homes during the then-seven years since Jews had seized power over Palestine . . .. »

A great deal has been written and spoken about various aspects of Jewish power, which is apparent not only in the political realm but economic and elsewhere, as mentioned above. The expert manipulation of Jewish power makes it almost irresistible.
In any discussion of Jewish power, the Rothschilds are central. This amazing family, which began in Frankfurt in the 18th century, today owns perhaps half of the goods and chattels of the world in their own name but mostly in various corporations and trusts and particularly through a stable of proxies — trusted Jews indentured to the family. An excellent overview of the Rothschild dynasty is given in Michael Collins Piper’s book, The New Babylon. One cannot read this book without realizing that the influence of Jewry in general and the Rothschilds in particular is awesome.
Meyer Rothschild, founder of the Jewish banking dynasty that today dominates Jewish global affairs, is show — Neanderthal-like– lording over the planet with his hungry vultures about to be unleashed on the bankrupt peoples of Earth. 

This 1849 painting depicts a bizarre Jewish religious ceremony at the London palace of the Rothschild dynasty which was commissioned by the family, demonstrating their unswerving fealty to the principles of their faith. An early admiring biographer of Meyer Rothschild declared that Rothschild was a « zealous believer in the Talmud [the guiding structure of Jewish laws] and chose it alone as the guiding principle of all his actions. » 

In America, Jewish power is exercised on both our internal and external affairs largely by the influence of the media. Although in the U.S. the formula is democratic — with public opinion and action spurred by newspapers and other organs of mass enlightenment — the Jews have shown that they can prosper in authoritarian systems as well, such as in a communist society (the USSR, a dictatorship with most officials and bureaucrats being Jewish) and « fascist » Franco Spain.
Politicians do their best to equate Judaism with Christianity. To them, Judaism is just another religion they must be aware of to get as many votes as possible from that particular group. They do not know about, nor do they care about the nature of Judaism. This is American democratic politics, the aim of which is to secure as many minority votes as possible to add up to a majority of the votes cast.

Please see the sidebar articles « Will the Jewish State Destroy the World, » and « Ancient Teachings Still Prevail… »

« Will the Jewish State Destroy the World » starts as follows:
« Let there be no doubt that Israel’s nuclear weapons of mass destruction are the cornerstone of Israel’s national defense policy and that this is founded on a deep-rooted, underlying religious (even racist) fanaticism. It is upon this basis that it can be rightly said that the world has some very real fears knowing that Israel maintains this dangerous arsenal. Also bear in mind the vital point that Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion, attached a fervent, even mystical, religious significance to his nation’s nuclear weapons development program.
According to Israeli historian Michael Karpin, writing in his book, The Bomb in the Basement, Ben-Gurion referred to the Jewish money lords who donated some $40 million in the 1950s (the equivalent of $250 million today) to seed the weapons program as the « makdishim, » or consecrators, and to their contributions as « hakdasha, » consecration. Karpin noted… »
« Ancient Teachings Still Prevail… » starts as follows:
« Jewish writer Samuel Roth’s provocative 1934 work, Jews Must Live, candidly addressed the theme of Jewish notions of « chosenness » and « superiority » which had been consistently instilled into the thinking of the Jewish people throughout history Roth described the nature of the Jewish religious teachings that were brought to him in his earliest years… »

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

Jewish Scholar Says:
by Willis A. Carto
A Jewish scholar, Shlomo Sand, a teacher of contemporary history at the University of Tel Aviv in Israel, rocked Israel with his best-selling Hebrew-language book, The Invention of the Jewish People, which is now available in English in mainstream U.S. bookstores.
Sand’s book is so powerful and provocative in that it demonstrates that virtually everything we think we know about the history of the Jews may just not be true, or, at the least, certainly not what many have held as an article of faith going back generations.
Because of the intense interest that Sand’s book generated, his publisher set up a special website on the Internet providing reviews of the book, commentaries relating to the controversy, and interviews with Sand. That web site can be found at On the site, the publishers provide an overview of Sand’s remarkable book which follows:
A historical tour de force that demolishes the myths and taboos that have surrounded Jewish and Israeli history, The Invention of the Jewish People offers a new account of both that demands to be read and reckoned with.
Was there really a forced exile in the first century, at the hands of the Romans?
Should we regard the Jewish people, throughout two millennia, as both a distinct ethnic group and a putative nation — returned at last to its Biblical homeland?
Shlomo Sand argues that most Jews actually descend from converts, whose native lands were scattered far across the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The formation of a Jewish people and then a Jewish nation out of these disparate groups could only take place under the sway of a new historiography, developing in response to the rise of nationalism throughout Europe.
Beneath the biblical backfill of the nineteenth-century historians, and the twentieth-century intellectuals who replaced rabbis as the architects of Jewish identity, The Invention of the Jewish People uncovers a new narrative of Israel’s formation, and proposes a bold analysis of nationalism that accounts for the old myths.
The central importance of the conflict in the Middle East ensures that Sand’s arguments will reverberate well beyond the historians and politicians that he takes to task.
Without an adequate understanding of Israel’s past, capable of superseding today’s opposing views, diplomatic solutions are likely to remain elusive. In this iconoclastic work of history, Shlomo Sand provides the intellectual foundations for a new vision ofIsrael’s future

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

Jesus Spoke Gentile Language
by Willis A. Carto
Although there will forever be debate over the meanings of the words « Jewish » and « Jew » and « Judah » and even the word « Israel » as they are used both in the Bible, in subsequent historical and religious teachings, and in modern usage itself, the late William Dudley Pelley provided this illustrative capsule overview providing a response to the question as to which branch of « the Jews » did Jesus Christ belong. Pelley’s answer:
Jesus Christ belonged to neither branch! Shocking as it becomes to modem Christians, an examination of the evidence now coming to light reveals that Jesus Christ was not a Jew or any other kind of an Israelite! This, of course, strikes at the very core and heart of present Christian doctrine. Nevertheless, sooner or later, Aryan Christians have got to face the facts. It takes a whole volume in itself to present these facts, but such a volume is available.
In the first place, the only true Jews are descendants of the Tribe of Judah, and even if Biblical bases be taken for argument, the New Testament says in a score of places that He emphatically did not come from that tribe. Christ was a Galilean …. Galilee got its name from the Gauls, brought down by the Assyrian king when he denuded the northern kingdom of Hebrews. The proper spelling of the word should be Gaulilee. Over and over, too, the New Testament writings speak of « Galilee of the gentiles. » …
The genealogies of Christ in … two New Testament gospels do not determine the matter, since they do not agree, and since they do not agree, neither one of them can be established as authentic. Moreover, Jews reckoned genealogies through the father, always. Christians are confronted by the dilemma that if they make a tenet of their faith that Mary conceived Christ by the Holy Ghost, then she did not conceive Christ by Joseph her husband; and if she did not do the latter, then the Hebrew genealogies, tracing Jesus’s ancestry back to David and Abraham, are fabrications.
Jesus did not speak the prevalent Jewish tongue of the period; He conversed in what was a gentile language. At no place did He Himself confirm that He was a Jew, and the words before Pilate, « Thou sayest! » were merely a colloquialism, not of acquiescence to Pilate’s remark but of the thought: « You’re doing the talking, I’m keeping quiet! »

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

URL for this web page:

Interbreeding, Religious Practices Created `Jewish’ People

by Willis A. Carto
The late William Dudley Pelley was a successful American screenwriter in the early years of Hollywood who later turned to historical and religious research and, in the end, was fiercely persecuted — and then criminally prosecuted — for his outspoken patriotic publishings and pronouncements. [A full-length account of Pelley’s efforts appeared in the March / April 2000 issue of THE BARNES REVIEW.-Ed.]
One arena in which Pelley focused his efforts was a study of the Jewish people and his assessments of their history and lore are fully relevant and accurate today as they were when he first addressed the subject.
Pelley sought to answer the question: « How did the Jews come to have such strange traditions setting them apart, racially and religiously, from the gentiles? » Pelley summarized his findings:
When Moses led the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt, he is traditionally credited with having introduced a strange custom for the perpetuation of his one-God religious ideas and the priesthood that was intended to keep them alive in the hearts of the Israelites. He laid it down as a law that the first-born son of every Hebrew family should be dedicated to the priestly calling, also that one-tenth of the resources of every family should be donated for the upkeep of such priesthood. Now for one boy out of every family to be qualified as a priest, or « cohen » from which so many modern Jews get the surname Cohen — meant that over a long period of time the numbers of priests must become prodigious.
There were so many of them, in fact, that they came to be recognized as a caste, called Levites. Incidentally from Levites we get the many variations or names such as Levi, or Levy, that designate today’s Jews. These formidable numbers of priests came eventually to make the Hebrews the worst priest-ridden people on the face of the earth. They had to be supported, and anything that in any way threatened their priestly jobs, met with swift and fierce opposition.
The only way that they could preserve these jobs, was by enforcing a rigid solidarity and racial consciousness among the masses, and binding them tight to the priestly counsel. The only way such solidarity and racial consciousness could be created and maintained in turn, was to so interpret religion — or what passed for religion — that the populace could not perform the simplest acts of daily life without having the priestly interpretation of it, and making the people feel that such priests were indispensable. This was accomplished by training the people to think that they were « different, » and thus creating the barrier between them and members of other races in consequence.
As the priests were likewise the only learned men, and in charge of the Israelite traditions, they could interject into those traditions what they pleased — if it only impressed upon their people a sense of the priestly importance, that they — the Israelites — were the truly great people and those beloved of the Creator, and that the priests were unchallenged leaders over them. Today we would term such monopoly a racket, because basically it was built on priestly gain and power. In other words, whatever enhanced the racial and spiritual solidarity of this people, enhanced the influence and indispensability of the priestly caste.
In teaching the Israelites to think that they were « different » and « better; » the priests were feathering their own nests and making their jobs sure-fire and profitable.
So Israelite — and later Jewish — traditions became what they are today. It is ingrained into Jews to think themselves « different, » and « better, » and the priest-rabbi now has such a hold over him that he cannot be a Jew without acknowledging the priest-rabbi influence in the most trivial of his daily acts.
So the Jews of today are orientals who have been kept politically intact throughout the earth by a clan consciousness derived from the peculiarities of their common Mosaic faith. Jews have crossbred with other races to such an extent that there is almost no such thing today as a pure-blooded Jew.
Anthropologically Jews are a racial hybrid, wherever we find him …. It is the more nearly correct thing to say that the Jew is the follower of a religion … and any claim to membership in a « race » is spurious.

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

URL for this web page:

Reckless Rites (hardcover, 332 pages, #476, $44 softcover, $25) is available from TBR Book Club, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Add $5 S&H inside the U.S. Outside the U.S. please email for best shipping rates to your nation. TBR subscribers may take 10% off book prices. Please call TBR toll free at 1-877-773-9077 to charge.
Hostility Toward Christians Rooted In Boisterous
Major Jewish Holiday
by Willis A. Carto

There is a little-known but deep-rooted history of virulent Jewish antagonism and violence against non-Jews (Christians in particular) but many scholars have ignored the record in this regard.
Now a forthright Jewish academic, Elliot Horowitz, associate professor of Jewish History at Israel’s Bar-Han University, has come forth with a book that explores this ugly phenomenon: Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence.
This heavily-detailed, copiously-documented volume is a stunning contribution to the history of the Jewish people and their troubled relationship with « the other » — the non-Jews whom the Jews refer to as « goyim, » a term, which roughly translated, is the equivalent of « beast » (or more specifically, cattle).
Purim — referred to in the book’s title — is the Jewish holiday spawned by the Old Testament’s Book of Esther, a holiday based on a tale most Jewish and Christian theologians say is apocryphal. Esther of legend was the Jewish maiden who — upon being married to the Persian king, who had no idea his bride was Jewish — saved the Jews from destruction at the hands of the king’s advisor, Haman, who was then executed, along WIth 75,000 other Persians. This, of course, was mass slaughter, genocide, and this early anti-Gentile Holocaust is proudly commemorated at Purim. Today again, the Jewish people and Israel target the Persian people — the modern republic of Iran — for destruction.
Most non-Jews have no idea the Jewish people — who often condemn various historical pogroms (real and imagined) — actually celebrate this genocide as one of their most boisterous holidays. Horowitz explains that, frequently, when Jews have broached the story of Purim to non-Jews that they have carefully deleted the conclusion of the story wherein the Jews orchestrated the slaughter of the Persians.
According to Horowitz, Jews have a record of comparing their arch-enemy Haman to Jesus Christ, hardly grounds for promoting « interfaith discourse, » or the concept of « Judeo-Christianity, » two trumpet calls which (when coming from Jewish sources) mean Christians must amend their teachings to accord with what Jews want Christians to believe. Horowitz notes comparisons of Haman to Christ are still prevalent in Jewish religious rites today.
In fact, he points out, deeply religious Jews have a record in modern-day Israel of acts of violence against non-Jews, but also acts of vandalism against Christian crosses. Horowitz focuses on how historians and theologians have deliberately distorted these uncomfortable truths about Jewish teachings and the real impact such teachings have had: that is, the instigation of violence by Jews against Christians.
An entire chapter in Horowitz’s book demonstrates the disturbing, one might say « weird, » Jewish hatred for the cross and of Jewish violence against displays of this Christian symbol and notes that, in fact, throughout history this Jewish hatred of Christ and the cross resulted in the rise of anti-Jewish attitudes in response. Horowitz explores Purim celebrations worldwide and demonstrates that violence and hatred toward non-Jews is commonplace and integral to the nature of the holiday theme. This ugliness is not the exception. Rather, it’s the rule, an unsettling fact to comprehend.
In fact, prior to the 20th century, at which time Jewish influence upon Christian religious discussion rose to great heights, most Christian theologians shared the view of German Protestant theologian Carl Heinrich Cornill who said of the Book of Esther that « all the worst and most unpleasing features of Judaism are here displayed without disguise. » Cornill echoed Emil Friedrich Kautzsch, who said the Book of Esther « expresses such national arrogance and such hatred of other nations. »
British Baptist Dr. Thomas Davies said of the Book of Esther that in its teachings, « Nothing seems wrong if only it furthers the advancement of the Jews. »

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

URL for this web page:

Jesus drives the money changers from the Temple, an overtly political act against the plutocrats of his day, that played a major role in the conspiracy to see him handed over to the Romans for his ultimate destruction — his assassination, if you will. Jesus in the Talmud (hardback, 210 pages, #TAL) is available from First Amendment Books in Washington, D.C. for $25. No S&H in U.S. Call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS to charge to major credit cards.
Talmud Spews Hatred of Christ, Christians
by Willis A. Carto
Scattered throughout the Talmud, the founding document of rabbinic Judaism in late antiquity, can be found quite a few references to Jesus — and they’re not flattering. The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus’ birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus’ resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell — and that a similar fate awaits his followers.
Were you shocked by these claims? Did you consider what you’ve read to be « rank anti-Semitism » or « vicious hatred »? Well, if you did, then you’ve just applied those labels to words taken directly from the promotional and introductory material on the flyleaf of a new book — Jesus in the Talmud — by a distinguished scholar, Dr. Peter Schafer, Director of the Program in Judaic Studies at Princeton University and professor of Judaic studies in a chair endowed by billionaire American Jewish philanthropist Ronald O. Perelman, a long-time generous patron of Jewish causes. And the publisher of the book is no less than the Princeton University Press, which has never been accused as a purveyor of anti-Semitic literature.
Schafer himself is highly regarded in the academic world and widely-published in the arenas of Jewish religious and historical literature. So now comes Shafer with a 210-page book which affirms — beyond question — that longtime Christian and Muslim critics of the Talmud were right when they said that the Talmud does teach filthy and hateful things about Christ. Muslims and Christians have been offended for thousands of years by those hateful teachings and — indeed, let it be said — one of the primary causes of anti-Jewish attitudes throughout history has been the negative reaction to the Talmud’s anti-Christ rantings.
Yet, ironically, although Judaism’s holiest book has devoted itself to smearing Christ, his beloved mother, Mary, and all of Christ’s teachings, the mass media in America never mentions this fact when discussing the causes of anti-Semitism. In fact-quite distinctly-the media prefers to focus on alleged anti-Jewish notations in the Christian New Testament and in the Islamic Koran (which, sadly unbeknownst to many Christians, holds Jesus Christ in high regard, very much in contrast to the Talmud).
For years, Jewish groups screamed when anyone dared to openly discuss the vile nature of much of what appears in the Talmud, which is the Jewish religious code (Judaism’s governing body of religious and ethical standards) about which most non-Jews have no understanding.
Many Christians mistakenly believe the myth that the Old Testament is as central to Judaism as it is the origins of Christianity, when, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth. The Talmud and other mystical works (unknown to Christians) are considered far more important in the eyes of Jewish scholars.
Now with Dr. Schafer’s book, there’s « mainstream » proof defenders of the Talmud have been dissembling. This fascinating (and disturbing) book is « must » reading for those who dare to delve into the controversial arena of political Zionism and who want to be armed with factual evidence regarding the weird world of the Talmud. But be warned: if you are a committed Christian, you may be deeply offended by the disgusting comments about Christ that appear in Judaism’s holiest writings.

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

Shown is an image of a statue of the Virgin Mary which an Israeli Army tank fired upon on March 14, 2002. The hated statue stood high above the Roman Catholic Holy Family Hospital and Orphanage in Jerusalem adjacent to the Vatican flag. The Israelis fired on the statue at close range. It was not an accident. It was an act of hatred reflecting a traditional Jewish hospitality to Christian sites and relics in the Holy Land. (Inset, the Virgin’s face.)


The Ugly History of Jewish Desecration of Many Christian Sites in the Holy Land
by Willis A. Carto

As early as December 1955, not long after the institution of the Jewish state of Israel, Father Leonard Feeney, a Boston-based Roman Catholic clergyman, compiled the following list of Christian churches and other institutions that had been attacked or otherwise destroyed by the newly-ensconced Jewish occupation regime in the Holy Land.
In assembling this shocking list — which would come as a complete surprise to modern-day Christians who believe that Israel has been a good friend to Christians in the Holy Land — Father Feeney noted that his list did not include the loss in lives and property suffered by the nearly one million Arabs (Christian and Muslim alike) who had been evicted from their ancient homes during the then-seven years since Jews had seized power over Palestine. And, needless to say, since Feeney first compiled the list, there have been many more examples of such Jewish attacks. The clergyman’s summary of Jewish destruction of Christian sites follows….
The Jews have defiled and destroyed the following Church buildings: the Church of Saint John the Baptist at Am Karim; the Church of the Beatitudes at Capharnaum; the Church of Mensa Christi on the shores of the Sea of Galilee; the Church of Saint Peter at Tiberias; the Cenacle (the place ofthe Last Supper) at Jerusalem; the Convent of Mary Reparatrix at Jerusalem; the Convent and Hospice of Notre Dame at Jerusalem; the Convent of the Sisters of Saint Ann at Haifa; the Franciscan Convent at Tiberias; the Patriarchal Seminary at Beit-Jala, the Salesian houses at Cremisan; the Sisters’ Convent at Am Karim; the School of the Sisters of Notre Dame de Sion at Katamon; the Sisters’ residence at Capharnaum; and the church and rectory at Ikret. Catholic authorities have estimated that the Jews have destroyed Church property in the Holy Land at the rate of more than two million dollars’ worth a year. To enumerate only French Catholic institutions, they have demolished four hospitals, 16 dispensaries, two hospices, four seminaries, 32 schools and orphanages, and seven retreat houses.
Among the countless other desecrations we might mention, none is more heart-rending than that of Jerusalem’s Church of the Dormition — the magnificent Romanesque shrine to the Mother of God which was pillaged by Israeli soldiers and then turned into a Jewish dance hall for the young men and women of Haganah. It was only after a hundred such incidents that the Apostolic Delegate, Archbishop Hughes, unequivocally charged that there is now in operation a « deliberate Jewish effort to decimate the Arabs and to destroy Christianity in Palestine. »

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

In Israel a popular icon is this comic book « super hero » — the Golem-based on the old legend of a rabbi’s creation who comes to life to destroy enemies of the Jewish people. Israel has a real-life golem in its nuclear weapons program. 

Will The Jewish State
Destroy the World?

by Willis A. Carto
Let there be no doubt that Israel’s nuclear weapons of mass destruction are the cornerstone of Israel’s national defense policy and that this is founded on a deep-rooted, underlying religious (even racist) fanaticism. It is upon this basis that it can be rightly said that the world has some very real fears knowing that Israel maintains this dangerous arsenal. Also bear in mind the vital point that Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion, attached a fervent, even mystical, religious significance to his nation’s nuclear weapons development program.
According to Israeli historian Michael Karpin, writing in his book, The Bomb in the Basement, Ben-Gurion referred to the Jewish money lords who donated some $40 million in the 1950s (the equivalent of $250 million today) to seed the weapons program as the « makdishim, » or consecrators, and to their contributions as « hakdasha, » consecration. Karpin noted:
Both of these Hebrew words derive from the word kadosh, sacred, which is also the root of the world Mikdash, or Temple — the holiest institution of Judaism. And inside the Temple is the Kodesh Hakodashim, the Holy of Holies. And like the Temple, which was erected with the contributions of the children of Israel (Exodus 25 :1), so too Israel’s nuclear program would be built with contributions. In Ben-Gurion’s eyes, the nuclear project was holy. [Emphasis added.]
Although pro-Israel propagandists in the Zionist-dominated mass media — in the United States in particular — often refers to the dangers of « The Islamic Bomb, » the very real existing danger in the world today is « The Jewish Hell Bomb » as it was once rightly described by the late populist historian Eustace Mullins.
That Israel and its supporters have no qualms about destroying what they perceive to be the determined enemies of Israel can not be doubted. Take for example the words of Professor David Perlmutter of Louisiana State University, writing in The Los Angeles Times of April 7, 2002:
What [is Israel] to do? I have other dreams as well — apocalyptic ones. I think: Israel has been building nuclear weapons for thirty years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow — it hurt the Romans not a whit, but, Samson in Gaza? With an H-bomb?
What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter? Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens?
For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away … have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?
And then consider the words of the foremost Israeli geopolitical and military thinker, Dr. Martin van Crevald, based at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He wrote:
We [Israelis] possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force. Our armed forces are not the 30th strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capacity to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under.
The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb (softcover, 225 pages, #JG, $25, no S&H in U.S.) by Michael Collins Piper tells the whole shocking story of Israel’s dangerous nuclear weapons program. The book is available for $25 from AMERICAN FREE PRESS, 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, #100, Washington, D.C. 20003. Call 1-888-699-6397 toll free to charge to Visa/MasterCard.

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

Anti-Christian religious teachings and perceived predatory practices by Jews in money-lending have resulted in outbreaks of anti-Jewish rebellion. Shown above is an 1899 illustration of one such incident that took place in Moravia. 

Ancient Teachings
Still Prevail…
by Willis A. Carto
Jewish writer Samuel Roth’s provocative 1934 work, Jews Must Live, candidly addressed the theme of Jewish notions of « chosenness » and « superiority » which had been consistently instilled into the thinking of the Jewish people throughout history. Roth described the nature of the Jewish religious teachings that were brought to him in his earliest years:
What the goyim [non-Jews] had was only a temporary possession which ‘the stupid law of the gentiles was attempting to make permanent. Were not they, the Jews, God’s chosen? Did not God mean in the very beginning that all the good things of the world should belong to His favorites?
It was the Jew’s business to remember this at all times. Especially in his dealings with the goyim, It was practically a moral obligation on the part of every conscientious Jew to fool and cheat the goy wherever and whenever possible.
The impression that this arrangement made on me at that time was the world had been created by God for the habitation and prosperity of Israel. The rest of creation–cows, horses, nettles, oak trees, dung and goyim-were placed there for our, the
Jews’, convenience or inconvenience, depending on God’s good humor for the time being.
We despised the goy and we hated his religion. The goy, according to the stories crooned into the ears of the children, wantonly worshiped an unsightly creature called the yoisel — and a dozen names too foul for repetition. The yoisel had once been a human being and a)ew. But one day he had gone out of his mind, and in that pitiably bewildered state, had announced that he was the Lord God Himself.
Roth describes that tale as « an extraordinary caricature of the founder of the opposing religion. » And, course, the yoisel in that tale was Jesus Christ.

A rabbi is shown instructing a student in the philosophy of the Talmud, which is the real foundation of the Jewish religion and its guide toward Jewish attitudes directing the other peoples of the planet. In the Talmud can be gleaned the origin of what is today referred to as ‘The New World Order. » 

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:

Achad Ha’am (1856-1927), meaning « one of the people » is the pen name of Asher Ginsberg, a Russian Zionist pinpointed as the godfather of the infamous « Protocols. »
Protocols Definitely
Not A Czarist Forgery
by Willis A. Carto
The extensive research of the late Pacquitta DeShishmareff, an American-born woman married into the Russian aristocracy, refutes the hackneyed old saw (heard and seen in one form or another almost daily in the mainstream media) that what we know today as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were some sort of « forgery. » Nothing could be further from the truth.
DeShishmareffs seminal work, Waters Flowing Eastward (written under the pen name « L. Fry ») remains the first — and last — word on the history of the Protocols. She firmly identified a Jew born in Russia, Asher Ginsberg (1856 to 1926), as the philosophical godfather of the infamous « Protocols. »
Ginsberg — best known as « Ahad Ha’am » (which means « One of the People ») — held the view that Jews needed to come together to make agricultural settlements in Palestine which would serve as what has been described as « a Hebrew-speaking cultural center for world Jewry — an elite cultural center for world Jewry. »
An Orthodox Jew, educated in rabbinical studies, Ginsberg said Jews were a « super nation » whose « ethnic genius must guarantee their right to world domination. » He said, « the Land of Israel must encompass all the countries of the earth in order to improve the world through God’s Kingdom. »
In the view of Jewish writer Moshe Menuhin, Ginsberg’s Zionist philosophy was « a spiritual Zionism — an aspiration for the fulfillment of Judaism and not political Zionism » — that is, the gathering of the entirety of the Jewish people in a single state, isolated from the rest of the planet, thriving only among their own people therein.
Ginsberg took issue with what he considered preeminent Zionist leader Theodore Herzl’s concept that Zionism was economic in nature and should be directed toward the establishment of a political and geographic state. In the view of Menuhin, Ginsberg regarded the Jews as « a unique sort of nation, a homogeneous body apart from the other nations » and that « a Jewish spiritual center in Palestine » would become « a light to the Diaspora » (the scattered Jews around the Earth) and eventually enable the Jewish people to become « a light to the nations. » This so-called « spiritual Zionism » of Ginsberg was thus synonymous with classical, prophetic Judaism, no different from the teachings of the Talmud that guided Judaism down through the centuries.
In short, the commonly-held theory advanced by many people today that « Zionism is not Judaism and Judaism is not Zionism » is wrong-simply wrong.
We learn that, in 1889, Ginsberg formulated a small group known as the Sons of Moses and it was before this group that Ginsberg first introduced the Protocols. While he may have indeed borrowed from previously published geopolitical works — lending to the oft-stated claim that the Protocols were « forgeries » that were lifted from other volumes — what we do know as the Protocols were Ginsberg’s product, reflecting his global Jewish agenda.
During the years that followed, Hebrew-language translations of the Protocols were circulated within the Zionist movement by Ginsberg and his followers, now banded together as the Sons of Zion (or « B’nai Zion »).
And in 1897, when the Zionist Congress met in Switzerland, Zionism emerged as an official movement, the Protocols were effectively incorporated into the Zionist (that is, Jewish) agenda.
While the non-Jewish world perceived Zionism to be strictly devoted to the establishment of a Jewish state, Ginsberg’s so-called « secret Zionism » was very much recognized, within elite Jewish circles, as the real agenda, an international agenda, in effect masked in a strictly nationalist agenda focused on a single Jewish state in Palestine.
Although there are anti-Zionist Jews who — for a variety of reasons — do oppose Zionism, there are also those anti-Zionist Jews who are actually advocates of the establishment of the Jewish Utopia, which is, in fact, the New World Order about which we hear so much. (See article beginning on page 41 of this issue of TBR [Editor’s Note: « Utopia…for Some« ].)

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

Short URL for this web page:
Israeli Newspapers Not Afraid
to Discuss Negative Aspects of
Judaism, State of Israel

by John Tiffany
Editor and Publisher
The Barnes Review
May/June 2010
What follows is the exact text of an article published on Nov. 16, 2009 in Ha’aretz, one of the most respected newspapers in Israel. The article was published under the candid headline: « U.S. State Department: Israel is not a tolerant society. » It is interesting to note even though many U.S. newspapers did mention the State Department report referenced in this article. the American media suppressed the negative references to Israel mentioned in the State Department report the Israeli newspaper article described. American media reports focused on State Department criticisms of other countries, but did not mention Israel’s failings. The Israeli newspaper account of the State Department report — far more accurate and revealing than the misdirection appearing in the American media — reads thus:
Israel dismally fails the requirements of a tolerant pluralistic society, according to a new report from the U.S. State Department.
Despite boasting religious freedom and protection of all holy sites, Israel falls short in tolerance toward minorities, equal treatment of ethnic groups, openness toward various streams within society, and respect for holy and other sites.
The comprehensive report, written by the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, says Israel discriminates against groups including Muslims, Jehova’s Witnesses, Reform Jews, Christians, women and Bedouin.
The report says that the 1967 law on the protection of holy places refers to all religious groups in the country, including in Jerusalem, but « the government implements regulations only for Jewish sites. Non-Jewish holy sites do not enjoy legal protection under it because the government does not recognize them as official holy sites. »
At the end of 2008, for example, all of the 137 officially recognized holy sites were Jewish. Moreover, Israel issued regulations for the identification, preservation and guarding of Jewish sites only. Many Christian and Muslim sites are said to be neglected, inaccessible or at risk of exploitation by real estate entrepreneurs and local authorities.
The report makes it clear that practices that have become routine in Israel are considered unacceptable in enlightened countries and should be corrected.
Among other examples, the report notes that more than 300,000 immigrants who are not considered Jewish under rabbinical law are not allowed to marry and divorce in Israel or be buried in Jewish cemeteries.
In the meantime, Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, a leading Jewish spiritual authority — head of an Orthodox Jewish school in one of the so-called « hardline » settlements of the Occupied West — issued a 230-page book in late 2009 entitled The King’s Torah, which the Israeli newspaper Maariv described as « a guide to whoever is deliberating if and when it is necessary and permissible to take the life of someone who is not Jewish. »
The book — which was endorsed by prominent and respected Jewish religious figures in Israel — suggested that any non-Jew (including children and babies) who could, in any way, pose a threat to Israel’s existence should be killed.
A summary of one portion of the book makes it clear that any non-Jew (a « gentile » as described in the Israeli press reports) who, in any way, no matter how innocently, is perceived to be a threat to Israel snould be slaughtered: « In any place that the presence of a gentile endangers the existence of Israel, it is allowed to kill him … also if he is completely not to blame for the situation that has been created. »
Why kill infants? The Jewish religious authorities explain that: « There is a reasonable explanation for killing infants if it is clear that they will grow up to hurt us — and in this situation, the strike should be directed at them. »
In addition, innocent people are allowed to be killed if they belong to a state that Israel considers an enemy. In other words, if Israel (or Jewish authorities) decided that America was, in some way, a threat to Israel, innocent Americans could be sent to the slaughter.
These are facts. There are not quotations from the pages of an « anti-Semitic conspiracy theory book. » Respected Jewish rabbis in Israel, supported by Jewish people in Israel, are heralding these ideas as ways to defend Israel.
Although lunatic figures such as John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Tim LaHaye and the late Jerry Falwell would probably find some twisted logic to endorse this homicidal madness, there are few sane Americans (of any religion) who would.
That is why it is so vital that sane Americans learn of the kind of terroristic, murderous teachings hold sway in Israel today — ideas found in the ancient teachings of the Jewish Talmud. Nothing new — but bad just the same.
Very Distinguished Names …
Over the decades there have been constant allegations by Jewish groups that some very well-known people past and present-political figures, literary giants, top-ranking military leaders and many others — have been either « anti-Semitic » or somehow unsupportive ofthe interests of the Jewish people and the state of Israel. The list of alleged anti-Semites that follows is by no means complete and continues to grow daily. Some of the names may surprise you, but if those who are making the accusations of « anti-Semitism » are correct and that those accused of being so are indeed « anti-Semitic, » then the ranks of anti-Semites include some very distinguished and respected names indeed. The list follows:
• President Barack Obama • President Richard Nixon • President John F. Kennedy • President Jimmy Carter • President George H.W. Bush • President Gerald Ford • President Harry Truman • Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (D-N.Y.) • Sen. William Fulbright (D-Ark.) • Sen. Charles Percy (R-Ill.) • Sen. Jim Abourezk (D-S.D.) • Sen. Adlai Stevenson (D-Ill.) • Sen. Ernest F. Hollings (D-S.C.) • Sen. Mike Gravel (D-Aka.) • Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) • Rep. Paul Findley (R-Ill.) • Rep. Pete McCloskey (R-Calif.) • Rep. Ed Zshau (R-Calif.) • Rep. Mary Rose Oakar (D-Ohio) • Rep. Mervin Dymally (D-Calif.) • Rep. Gus. Savage (D-Ill.) • Rep. John R. Rarick (D-La.) • Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) • Rep. Jim Traficant (D-Ohio) • Rep. Earl Hilliard (D-Ala.) • UN Ambassador Bill Scranton • UN Ambassador Andrew Young • Governor John B. Connally (D-Texas) • Defense Secretary James Forrestal • Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger • Secretary of State James Baker • Gen. George Patton • Gen. George C. Marshall • Gen. George Stratemeyer • Gen. Albert Wedemeyer • Col. Charles A. Lindbergh • Gen. Robert Wood • Gen. George V Strong (chief of Military Intelligence-l 942-45) • Maj Gen. George Van Horn Moseley (U.S. Army assistant chief of staff) • Col. Sherman Miles (chief of Military Intelligence) • Gen. George Brown (chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff) • Adm. Thomas Moorer (chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff) • Gen. Pedro Del Valle (U.S. Marines) • W A. Carto • Dr. Mahathir Mohamad • Walt Disney • Thomas Edison • Hemy Ford • Carl Jung • Truman Capote • H.L. Mencken • Theodore Dreiser • Lord Byron • Nathaniel Hawthorne • Ernest Hemingway • Thomas Carlyle • Henry James • F. Scott Fitzgerald • Henry Adams • T.S. Eliot • George Eliot• Washington Irving • Jack Kerouac • Gore Vidal • Percy Shelley • Rudyard Kipling • C. Northcote Parkinson • H.G. Wells • D. H. Lawrence • Franz Liszt • James Russell Lowell • Somerset Maugham • Henry Mill • Eugene O’Neill • Sir Walter Scott • Ezra Pound • George Sand • George Bernard Shaw • Johannes Brahms • Richard Wagner • William Faulkner • Robert Louis Stevenson • George Orwell .

JOHN TIFFANY is the assistant editor of TBR.

Short URL for this web page:



AS DR. ISRAEL SHAHAK, AN EMINENT ISRAELI DISSIDENT, made clear in his monumental study, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Israel’s deep-rooted racism — and religious fanaticism — has played a major part in its policies toward non-Jews inside Israel and in the occupied lands and its outlook toward the world as a whole. And because of Israel’s willingness to utilize its nuclear « Sampson Option » — effectively blowing up the world in the course of an act of national suicide — the existence of lsrael’s massive nuclear arsenal is good cause for concern, precisely because of Israel’s underlying institutional racism. This excerpt from Michael Collins Piper’s book, The Golem, explores Shahak’s disturbing revelations.


By Michael Collins Piper

Those who strive to be fair and open-minded toward other faiths, particularly in the discussion of the Middle East conflict, are often heard to proclaim « Zionism is Not Judaism, » referring to the fact that there are some Jewish sects that do indeed reject Zionism, and which (at least for now) question the need for the entity we know as Israel.
However, the fact remains that Israel, as now constituted, is a Jewish state, one that has notoriously imposed second-class status on its Arab citizens and carried out hellish policies against Arabs — Christian and Muslim alike — in the occupied territories. There is a wealth of documentation on this and this point need not here be elaborated. upon.
What many people do not realize — even many critics of Israel, if truth be told — is that the reasons for these policies against the Arabs have much more to do with religion and racism than they do with politics. The late Dr. Israel Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion is an eye-opening study of the teachings of Jewish Orthodoxy, examining how that little understood persuasion — very powerful, in its original form, in Israel today (and not only among the Orthodox Jews) — impacts upon both Israeli domestic and foreign policy and upon the Israeli view of non-Jewish peoples worldwide.
Although the American mass media is rife with horror stories of purported Muslim hostility to Christians and Jews alike, the fact — as documented by Israel Shahak — of Jewish religious and racial hostility to all non-Jews is never discussed. Repeat: it is never discussed.
A most uncomfortable work for Christians — who would like to believe that Orthodox Judaism is some sort of friendly grand-uncle to the Christian faith and for Jews who would have Americans, in particular, believe that Israel is some exotic modem-day Biblical manifestation and a model for the civilized world to pattern itself upon — Dr. Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion established the Israeli dissident in the minds of free-thinkers as a forthright expositor of the historical circumstances — and of the religious and philosophical mindset — that together guide Israel and its ruling elite today. In that volume, Shahak wrote:
A Jewish state, whether based on its present Jewish ideology or, if it becomes even more Jewish in character than it is now, on the principles of Jewish Orthodoxy, cannot ever contain an open society.
There are two choices which face Israeli-Jewish society. It can become a fully closed and warlike ghetto, a Jewish Sparta, supported by the labor of Arab helots, kept in existence by its influence on the U.S. political establishment and by threats to use its nuclear powers, or it can try to become an open society.
The second choice is dependent on an honest examination of its Jewish past, on the admission that Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism exist, and on an honest examination of the attitudes of Judaism toward the non-Jews.

« The Talmud states that in hell, Jesus is to be immersed in boiling excrement — a statement not exactly calculated to endear the Talmud to Christians. »

Shahak candidly described the nature of the hostility toward non-Jews that is found in Jewish religious teachings:

It must be admitted at the outset that the Talmud and the Talmudic literature — quite apart from the general anti-Gentile streak that runs through them … contain very offensive statements and precepts directed specifically against Christianity.
For example, in addition to a series of scurrilous sexual allegations against Jesus, the Talmud states that his punishment in hell is to be immersed in boiling excrement — a statement not exactly calculated to endear the Talmud to devout Christians. Or one can quote the precept according to which Jews are instructed to bum, publicly if possible, any copy of the New Testament that comes into their hands.
(This is not only still in force but actually practiced today; thus on 23 March 1980 hundreds of copies of the New Testament were publicly and ceremonially burnt in Jerusalem under the auspices of Yad Le’ akhim, a Jewish religious organization subsidized by the Israeli Ministry of Religions.)

Commenting upon the fact that many Christian people in the West had discovered the virulent anti-Christian teachings in the Talmud, Shahak described how Jewish leaders sought to « revise » the Talmud in order that future Christians who sought to study the Talmud would effectively be fooled by such revisions:

Talmudic passages directed against Christianity or against non-Jews had to go or to be modified — the pressure was too strong.
This is what was done: a few of the most offensive passages were bodily removed from all editions printed in Europe after the mid-16th century.
In all other passages, the expressions « gentile, » « non-Jew, » « stranger » (goy, eino yehudi, nokhri) — which appear in all early manuscripts and printings as well as in all editions published in Islamic countries — were replaced by terms such as « idolator, » « heathen » or even « Canaanite » or « Samaritan, » terms which could be explained away but which a Jewish reader could recognize as euphemisms for the old expressions.

However, in Czarist Russia, Shahak noted, the newly-inserted euphemisms for non-Jews were recognized immediately for precisely what they were.
As such, Talmudic scholars made further clever revisions to appease the authorities:

Thereupon the rabbinical authorities substituted the terms « Arab » or « Muslim » (in Hebrew, Yishma’eli — which means both) or occasionally « Egyptian, » correctly calculating that the Tsarist authorities would not object to this kind of abuse.

Yet, for the consumption of the Jews themselves, Shahak pointed out, the Talmudic scholars provided guidelines so that students of the Talmud (and Jews in general) could understand the new « code » words:

At the same time, lists of Talmudic Omissions were circulated in manuscript form, which explained all the new terms and pointed out all the omissions. At times, a general disclaimer was printed before the title page of each volume of talmudic literature, solemnly declaring, sometimes on oath, that all hostile expressions in that volume are intended only against the idolators of antiquity, or even against the long-vanished Canaanites, rather than against « the peoples in whose land we live. »
After the British conquest of India, some rabbis hit on the subterfuge of claiming that any particularly outrageous derogatory expression used by them is only intended against the Indian. Occasionally the aborigines of Australia were also added as whipping boys.
Needless to say, all this was a calculated lie from beginning to end; and following the establishment of the State of Israel, once the rabbis felt secure, all the offensive passages and expressions were restored without hesitation in all new editions.

Shahak wrote of the great Jewish scholar Moses Maimonides whose Guide to the Perplexed is, as Shahak noted, « justly considered to be the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy and is widely read and used even today. » In fact, as Shahak revealed, Maimonides was intensely racist, in the classic modem-day sense of the word: that is, the iconic Jewish figure, a major authority on the Talmud, was, as Shahak put it: « an anti-Black racist. » Shahak wrote:

Towards the end of the Guide, in a crucial chapter (book III, chapter 51) he discusses how various sections of humanity can attain the supreme religious value, the true worship of God. Among those who are incapable of even approaching this are: « Some of the Turks [i.e. the Mongol race] and the nomads in the north, and the Blacks and the nomads in the south, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion, they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does. »

Pathetic images such as these — of innocent children butchered by the Israeli military (which calls itself the « most moral » military force on the entire planet) — are seldom displayed to the American people by the pro-Israel media in the United States. These children were killed in northern Gaza, Palestine.
Noting this, Shahak asks: « Now, what does one do with such a passage in a most important and necessary work of Judaism? Face the truth and its consequences? God forbid! Admit (as so many Christian scholars, for example, have done in similar circumstances) that a very important Jewish authority held also rabid anti-Black views, and by this admission make an attempt at self-education in real humanity? Perish the thought. » Commenting on the inflammatory nature of these writings from the pen of an esteemed Talmudic scholar, Shahak added:

I can almost imagine Jewish scholars in the USA consulting among themselves, ‘What is to be done?’ — for the book had to be translated, due to the decline in the knowledge of Hebrew among American Jews. Whether by consultation or by individual inspiration, a happy « solution » was found: in the popular American translation of the Guide by one Friedlander, first published as far back as 1925 and since then reprinted in many editions, including several in paperback, the Hebrew word kushim, which means blacks, was simply transliterated and appears as « Kushites, » a word which means nothing to those who have no knowledge of Hebrew, or to whom an obliging rabbi will not give an oral explanation.

Shahak also noted the irony, as he put it, that « There is yet another misconception about Judaism which is particularly common among Christians or people heavily influenced by Christian tradition and culture. This is the misleading idea that Judaism is a ‘biblical religion’; that the Old Testament has in Judaism the same central place and legal authority which the Bible has for Protestant or even Catholic Christianity. »
Nothing, he said, could be further from the truth, and this, he understood, would come as a great surprise to many Christians who have lent their support to Israel, believing Judaism (and Israel) to have risen from the same principles of the Christian faith predominant in America today.
Shahak underscored the nature of Talmudic teachings vis-a-vis non-Jews, pointing out that the Talmud declares: « A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all. »
Should anyone doubt this is the philosophy of Israel, as a state, Shahak pointed out that the chief chaplain of the Central Region Command of the Israeli Army wrote in a religious booklet for distribution to Israeli soldiers that:

When our forces come across civilians during a war or in hot pursuit or in a raid, so long as there is no certainty that those civilians are incapable of harming our
forces, then according to the Halakhah they may and even should be killed … Under no circumstances should an Arab be trusted, even if he makes an impression of being civilized.
In war, when our forces storm the enemy, they are allowed and even enjoined by the Halakhah to kill even good civilians, that is, civilians who are ostensibly good. [Emphasis added.]

(The Halakha-referenced above — is the legal system of classical Judaism, based primarily on the Babylonian Talmud, and is maintained to this day in the form of Orthodox Judaism which is a powerful force in Israel. The earliest code of Talmudic law is the Mishneh Torah, written by the aforementioned Moses Maimonides in the late 12th century.)
Shahak noted that classical Jewish teaching links Satan with non-Jews and that Jewish women were warned to beware meeting any of these Satanic creatures: « Gentile, pig, dog or monkey. » If meeting such a creature after taking her monthly ritual bath of purification, a Jewish woman is told she must bathe again. This warning appeared in Shevat Musar — a book on Jewish moral conduct — that, Shahak noted is « still widely read in some Orthodox circles. » In contrast, Jewish teachings regarding non-Jewish women is quite different:

Every gentile woman is regarded as N.Sh.G.Z. — acronym for the Hebrew words niddah, shifhah, goyah, zonah (unpurified from menses, slave, gentile, prostitute). Upon conversion to Judaism, she ceases indeed to be niddah, shifhah, goyah but is still considered zonah (prostitute) for the rest of her life, simply by virtue of having been born of a gentile mother.

In light of all of this — and much more — Shahak recognized that organized Jewish groups and Jewish leaders, particularly in the United States and the West, understand — as they should — that non-Jews might find offense in such teachings and that « Under present circumstances they cannot openly express these attitudes toward non-Jews in the USA where non-Jews constitute more than 97 percent of the population. » Shahak said Jews (and Israelis) must recognize the underlying racism of their ethnic and Israeli national psyche: « Although the struggle against antisemitism (and of all other forms of racism) should never cease, the struggle against Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism, which must include a critique of classical Judaism, is now of equal or greater importance … Without fear or favor, we must speak out against what belongs to our own past ….  »
There have been many informative critiques of Israel’s foreign policy gyrations and manipulations written from a variety of perspectives, but Shahak’s work will stand as a decisive analysis of what Israel’s real aims and motivations are really all about.
Dr. Shahak’s candid discussion of Jewish religious teachings are enlightening indeed, especially when one considers the power of Israel over United States policy making today. Then, when pondering how that religious ideology impacts upon Israel’s geopolitical strategy — particularly as it is based upon that nation’s pivotal arsenal of nuclear weapons of mass destruction — the entire picture is one that points toward a possible future for the world too horrible to imagine.

An Ancient Conflict Between Peoples . .
In early 1928, The Century Magazine published a remarkable essay by Marcus Eli Ravage, an eminent Romanian-born Jewish writer in America, entitled « A Real Case Against the Jews. » With sarcasm and bitter irony Ravage — who previously wrote an admiring study of the Rothschild banking family — addressed the ancient conflicts between the Jewish people and all others. What follows is an abbreviated rendition of what Ravage put forth:
Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe against Jewish invasion.
We are, if you are to be believed, at once clannish and exclusive and unassimilable because we won’t intermarry with you, and we are also climbers and pushers and a menace to your racial integrity.
Our standard of living is so low that we create your slums and sweated industries, and so high that we crowd you out of your best residential sections.
We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the arch-plotters of universal wars and the chief beneficiaries of those wars.
We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!
And, oh! I almost forgot the reason of reasons. We are the stiff-necked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder.
But I can tell you, you are self-deceivers. You lack either the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some ofygu seem to think, he crucified Jesus but because he gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!
Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge, What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is nothing more than a mere street brawl.
« You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken … your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. »
You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders.
We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history.
We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.
Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.
We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the earth, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents at large of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to the unexplored ends of the earth.
And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you.
We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot swallow or digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full.
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us.

is a frequent contributor to THE BARNES REVIEW and the author of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy ($25), called the definitive work on the JFK execution. He is also the author of The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America ($19.95) and The High Priests of War ($19.95). Order any of these books from TBR BOOK CLUB by calling 1-877-773-9077 toll free and charging to Visa or MasterCard. TBR’subscribers take 10% off book prices. Add $3 per book S&H.

This period cartoon illustrates the crowned heads of Europe — the ostensible rulers of the day — bowing before Lionel Rothschild on his throne of mortgages, loans and cash. In fact, this was the reality of the day, the effective fruition of the age-old Jewish dream of a New World Order — a Jewish Utopia — in which all other peoples of the planet would bow down and worship the Jewish people, the new rulers of the Earth. For good reason, indeed, Rothschild was known as the « king of kings. »
Utopia…for Some

THERE IS EVIDENCE — IT IS NO ‘THEORY’ — that long-established and much-heralded Jewish religious teachings assert that the Jewish people will ultimately come to rule the world, that they are superior to all other people and that ultimately they will be, essentially, the proverbial master race. Here are the facts about this bizarre (and dangerous) philosophy as excerpted from Michael Collins Piper’s book, The New Babylon. This will be uncomfortable reading for those who have never before been exposed to the type of philosophy outlined in ancient Jewish tradition.
— Willis A. Carto
Editor and Publisher
The Barnes Review
May/June 2010


The Jewish Utopia:
The New World Order

The New Babylon
by Michael Collins Piper
In 1932, Michael Rigger, Ph.D., assembled a remarkable book entitled The Jewish Utopia, which he dedicated to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which he described as [the] « symbol of the Jewish Utopia. » Rigger’s volume is a remarkable document which the late Robert H. Williams, an American nationalist writer of the 1950s and 1960s, described as a compendium of the philosophy behind what Williams called « the Ultimate World Order » — that is, the New World Order.
What is remarkable about Higger’s book is that the copy that Robert H. Williams first discovered and then popularized among American nationalists was found at the Abraham I. Schechter Collection of Hebraica and Judaica of the Texas University Library, donated by the Kallah of Texas Rabbis. So Higger’s book was no mere « think piece » by one isolated writer. The organization of rabbis in Texas thought so highly of the work that they donated that copy to the state university’s library.
Dr. Higger’s book was a compilation of Higger’s study of what Williams described as « the sum total of the prophecies, teachings and plans and interpretations of the foremost Jewish rabbis and tribal leaders over a period of some 2,500 years, » since the time of the oral law and the beginning of the Babylonian Talmud, in which could be found what Williams described as a « double standard for Jews and non-Jews and its nationalistic, militaristic interpretation of the Torah » (the Torah, of course, being the first five books of the Old Testament — the so-called « Five Books of Moses »).
The books talked of « the righteous » and « the non-righteous. » In the end, according to Higger’s interpretation of Jewish tradition, the « non-righteous » shall perish. » Higger wrote:
To understand the rabbinic conception of an ideal world, it will help us if we imagine a hand passing from land to land, from country to country, from the Indian Ocean to the North Pole, marking « righteous » or « wicked » on the forehead of each one of the 16 hundred million inhabitants of our earthly globe.
We should then be on the right road toward solving the major problems that burden so heavily the shoulders of suffering humanity. For mankind should be divided into two-and only two-distinct and unmistakable groups, namely, righteous and wicked. To the righteous would belong all that which God’s wonderful world is offering; to the wicked would belong nothing.
In the future, the words of Isaiah, in the language of the rabbis, will be fulfilled: « Behold, My servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry. Behold, My servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty; Behold, My servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed. »
This is the force of the prophecy of Malachi, when he said, « Then shall ye again discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth Him not. »


This quaint cartoon with a double-edged meaning, appeared in the British satirical journal Puck (circa 1880). A Jewish peddler carrying his wares of poetry, music, statesmanship, science, literature, patriotism — and promissory notes — thumbs his nose at German chancellor Bismarck (with scepter) and American hotel keepers Henry Hilton (left) and Austin Corbin (right), who had barred Jews from their hotels, telling his gentile tormenters: « I have thriven on this sort of thing for 18 centuries–Go on, gentlemen, persecution helps de pizness [i.e. business]. »
And it is clear, throughout Higger’s writings (based on his analysis of the works of the great rabbis and Jewish spiritual leaders) that the « righteous » shall be the Jews and those who choose to align themselves as servants of the Jews and the « wicked » will be those who are perceived by the Jews to be standing in opposition to their interests!
Higger cites the words of the Talmud: « It is a heritage for us [the Jews], not for them [that is, everyone else-every other human being on the face of the entire planet]. »
Higger goes on to point out that under this New World Order (what he calls « The Jewish Utopia »): « All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous. » This, he said, would be in keeping, with thy prophecy of Isaiah: « In her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall be not treasured nor laid out, for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing. »
But that wasn’t all. The Jews and their hirelings would have even more riches under the Jewish Utopia. Higger noted that: « Similarly, the treasures of gold, silver, precious stones, pearls and valuable vessels that have been lost in the seas and oceans in the course of centuries will be raised up and turned over to the righteous … » Higger added:
In the present era the wicked or ordinary rich, have many comforts in life, while the righteous are poor, missing the joys of life. But in the ideal era, the Lord will open up all the treasures for the upright and the unrighteous will suffer. God, the Creator of the world … will be happy, so to speak, only in the era to come when the world will be governed by the doings and actions of the upright.
Here is the amazing summary of it all by Higger:
In general, the peoples of the world will be divided into two main groups: the Israelitic and the non-Israelitic. The former will be righteous; they will live in accordance with the wishes of one universal God, they will be thirsty for knowledge and willing to the point of martyrdom to spread ethical truths to the world. All the other peoples, on the other hand, will be known for their detestable practices: idolatry and similar acts of wickedness. They will be destroyed and will disappear from earth before the ushering in of the ideal era.

In short, this is effectively discussion of massive extermination of those who stand up to the Jewish Utopia — the New World Order. It continues:
All of these unrighteous nations shall be called to judgment before they are punished and doomed. The severe sentence of their doom will be pronounced upon them only after they have been given a fair trial when it will become evident that their existence would hinder the advent of the ideal era.
Thus, at the coming of the Messiah, when all righteous nations will pay homage to the ideal righteous leader and offer gifts to him, the wicked and corrupt nations, by realizing the approach of their doom, will bring similar presents to the Messiah. Their gifts and pretended acknowledgment of the new era will be blunted rejected, for the really wicked nations, like the really wicked individuals must disappear from the earth before an ideal human society of righteous nations can be established.
And when one considers the fact that the Jewish concept of the Messiah is often reckoned to be that the Jewish people themselves are « the Messiah, » what Higger has described takes on even more consequence.
What of Armageddon? This is stuff of which legends are made. Armageddon, in Jewish tradition, is the final battle in which the Jews will once and for all establish their absolute rule over the earth. According to Higger’s analysis of the Jewish teachings in this regard:
Hence, Israel and the other righteous nations shall combat the combined forces ofthe wicked, unrighteous nations under the leadership of Gog and Magog.
Assembled for an attack on the righteous nations in Palestine near Jerusalem, the unrighteous will suffer a crushing defeat and Zion will thenceforth remain the center of the kingdom of God.
The defeat of the unrighteous will mark the annihilation of the power of the wicked who oppose the Kingdom of God, an establishment of the new ideal era.
Note the use of the term « new ideal era. »
It is no coincidence that the terminology is reflective and reminiscent of the term « New World Order » for that is precisely what the Jewish Utopia — this « new ideal era » — happens to be.
This struggle will not just be a struggle of Israel against her « national enemies » but the climax of the struggle between the « righteous » and « unrighteous. » So say the Jewish sages.
Who are the « wicked »? Higger explained that « wickedness » is « an obstruction to the Kingdom of God. » He said that « no exact definition » can be formulated, but that there were rabbinic passages dealing with the subject giving a general idea of the meaning of « wicked » and « wickedness » so far as a Jewish Utopia was concerned. And note that he does specify that these terms are defined in terms of a Jewish Utopia. Higger asserted:
First, no line will be drawn between bad Jews and bad non-Jews.
There will be no room for the unrighteous whether Jewish or non-Jewish in the Kingdom of God. All of them will have disappeared before the advent of the ideal era on this earth. Unrighteous Israelites will be punished equally with the wicked of other nations. All the righteous, on the other hand, whether Hebrew or Gentile, will share equally in the happiness and abundance of the ideal era.
In contrast to what the average American Christian would think about all of this, or perceive in the context of his Christian faith, which looks forward to a universal kingdom of God in Heaven, the paradise referred to throughout The Jewish Utopia describing the « new ideal era » — the New World Order — is « a universal paradise of mankind … established in this world, » with no reference to the future world whatever.
Who will rule this New World Order? According to Higger’s assessment of the Jewish tradition: « He will be a descendant of the House of David. »
Higger advises us that Talmudic tradition says that « a descendant of the House of David will appear as the head of the ‘ideal era’ only after the whole world will have suffered, for a continuous period of nine months, from a wicked, corrupt government like the historically traditionally wicked Edom. »
(Note: Today there is a formally organized international Jewish organization, Davidic Dynasty, openly working to track down and reunite all of the descendants of the House of David. This is no « conspiracy theory. » It is fact. Knowing what the Talmud teaches about who shall rule the globe, we can perhaps understand the motivation of this group.)

Another image from the British journal Puck (circa 1880). A bloated, arrogant Jewish « swell » is shown strutting on Broadway in New York surrounded by scenes of anti-Jewish events in European history, including the banishment of the Jews from France and Spain and restrictions against corruption and predatory Jewish financial practices that were instituted in other civilized societies. The outline under the image reads: « They Are the People. The Downtrodden One. `They Have Always Persecuted Us’ But We Get There All the Same! »
And, Higger proclaimed, the whole world will « gradually come to the realization that Godliness is identical with righteousness, » and that God « cleaves to Israel and that Israel is the ideal righteous nation. »
According to these rabbinic teachings which are the foundation for the age-old Jewish dream of the establishment of the New World Order, the peoples of the earth will then proclaim to the Jewish rulers: « We will go with you, for we have heard that God is with you. »
So it is that, as the rabbis proclaim: « The people of Israel will conquer spiritually the peoples of the earth, so that Israel will be made high above all nations in praise, in name and in glory. »
Note the concept of « conquer » — as in battle. Note the concept of Israel raised above all others — as in supremacy and superiority. Violence and racism toward the non-Jews: as simple as that.
It is no coincidence that many other Jewish writers and philosophers of consequence have said that there will eventually be global religion and, in fact, we have seen efforts to infiltrate all of the religions of the world, to move them closer to one another, and this, Higger related, has been part of the prophecy: « The nations would first unite for the purpose of calling upon the name of the Lord to serve him. »
In other words, there would be a world government and one global religion, and as Higger and others have noted, that international religion would be Judaism. That would be the « spiritual conquest » of the world.
What about gold? What about wealth? According to Higger, although gold played a part in the conquest by the righteous, to whom it was given by God, in the new ideal era « gold will be of secondary importance in the new social and economic order. But the City of Jerusalem will possess most of the gold and precious stones of the world … The depreciation of the importance of gold and its like does not necessarily imply the introduction of a system of common ownership of property. »
In other words, the Jews will have control of it all and since the Jews — via the City of Jerusalem — will be in control of the gold, it really will not be of any consequence in the New World Order in which the Jews rule .
Higger further added:
The secondary importance given to gold in the new social order will be for two main reasons:
1) The equal distribution of private property and other necessities oflife will automatically depreciate the importance of gold and other luxuries;
2) The people will be trained and educated to differentiate between real, spiritual values and material values.
Indeed, it will be the Jewish power, seated in Jerusalem, headed by a descendant of the House of David-referred to as « the Holy One » — who will divide up the property of the world.
Who will get this property? The answer, as defined by rabbinic authority: « To the righteous will belong all the wealth, treasures and industrial gains and other resources of the world. To the unrighteous will belong nothing. »
The unrighteous nations « will not share in the ideal era. » Their rule will be destroyed and disappear before the ushering in of the New World Order. The « wickedness » of these nations will consist mainly in accumulating money belonging to « the people » and of oppressing and robbing « the poor. »
Although Higger does not state this emphatically, those familiar with Talmudic tradition, logic and reasoning, the « people » and the « poor » are the Jews: The Talmud teaches that only Jews are humanity and all others are animals, thus, of course, only Jews can be « people. » The « poor » are — of course — the Jews who have forever painted themselves as the victims and the oppressed — as in « the poor, persecuted Jews. »
Another group of the « wicked » nations will suffer the same fate as the first: « Their unrighteousness will be characterized by their corrupt governments and by their oppressions of Israel. »
In other words, any government that stands against the Jews will thus be considered to be wicked and unrighteous if it dares to challenge the Jewish global agenda: the New World Order.
In the end, ultimately, according to Higger, the motto of this overarching Jewish demand for a Utopia of their vision and dream will be this — and note it carefully: « Righteous Unite! Better Destruction of the World Than a Wicked World. » That’s right: the Jewish philosophy is that the world is better off destroyed unless, of course, the « righteous » — that is, the Jews and those who worship them — prevail over the « wicked, » that is, the non-Jews who dare to challenge Jewish power.
[America First Books Editor’s Note: End of extract, about two-thirds the way through Chapter 2]

WILLIS A. CARTO, is founder of The American Free Press and The Barnes Review.

URL for this web page:,_Willis/Barnes_2006-2010/Willis_A._Carto_2010_05-06_TBR;_Introduction;_Nuclear_Weapons;_The_Neanderthal_Gift_to_Modern_Civilization.html


The late Eustace Mullins (1923-2010) was, beyond question, the preeminent American populist and nationalist historian of his day. Broadly educated and steeped in cultural, artistic and political knowledge, recognition and understanding — like so few in our day — Mullins wrote with no-nonsense passion in opposition to those waging a barbarous campaign to undermine — to destroy — Western Civilization. Mullins’ books and thousands of articles and monographs named names and pinpointed the forces that he courageously and relentlessly fought throughout his monumental lifelong career.
Frankly, we are hard-pressed to single out one particular essay by Mullins encapsulating the wide theme addressed in this special issue of TBR. Perhaps only his remarkable books, The Biological Jew or his New History of the Jews fulfill that need.
However, the following excerpt from Mullins’s introduction to a 1981 reprint ofthe original 1940 edition of the classic work War! War! War! — first published with the intent of exposing the forces driving the West into fratricidal conflict in order to advance what one English writer, Arnold Leese, called « the Jewish War of Survival » — says much that needs to be said.
That essay by Mullins is presented here as a special memorial to Eustace who is remembered so fondly by so many people in the United States and throughout the world, even in Japan where he was an honored guest and revered writer and artist during the last years of his life.
War! War! War!
By Eustace Mullins
One hundred million white people died violently during World War II, but the only Asiatic people to suffer serious losses were the Japanese, who were known as « the Aryans of the East, » because of their aggressiveness and their highly developed technological abilities. Because of their well known opposition to Communism, the Japanese people were selected by Jewish strategists as the guinea pigs for the testing of the new Jewish Hellbomb, a weapon so horrible that when Hitler learned his scientists had begun work on it, he furiously ordered them to halt its development. He refused to allow his name or the name of the German people to be associated with such an in-humane operation.
This allowed the Jews to develop their atomic hellbomb in Los Alamos for Roosevelt and Stalin, with no competition from anywhere in the world. They developed it in order to exterminate the entire German people, but, with the unlimited funds provided by American taxpayers, they turned it into a typical billion dollar Jewish boondoggle which dragged on until after Germany’s defeat. Fortunately, the homicidal maniacs still had one anti-Communist nation left on which they could conduct their atomic experiment, the island of Japan.
Like most historic Jewish military operations, the great massacres of World War II occurred, not on the battlefield, but in peaceful neighborhood communities. This was in accordance with the dictate of the Book of Esther, which directs the Jews to massacre women and children, and to exterminate the families of those who dare to oppose them. Thus it was in Dresden, a historic German cultural center, where many thousands of German women and children, refugees from Communism had gathered. They were assured by the Red Cross that they would be safe, even while the Jewish generals were preparing to murder the men.
The blood-maddened Jews desired not only to murder as many White civilians as possible but also to erase from history all evidence of Western civilization, the greatest examples of White culture which had been gathered in Dresden, the irreplaceable porcelain, the priceless paintings, the baroque furniture, and the rococo mansions with their poetry carved in stone.
All was laid waste in a mass bombing attack in which some 300,000 German civilians died in a city which was not even a military target. The responsibility for this slaughter, in which helpless non-combatants died horribly by flame and explosion, rests with, who else, « the Americans. » At the last minute, the Soviets prudently withdrew from what was planned as a « joint-Allied » venture. Today, the Soviets denounce the U.S. for the annihilation of Dresden.
Like Dresden, Hiroshima was also an ancient cultural center, with no visible military objective. Its non-combatant families also died horribly by the hundreds of thousands. Many were pulverized instantly by the first atomic bomb ever used in a military operation, but thousands of other victims lived on for years, mangled and burned, their limbs and organs slowly rotting away from radiation poisoning.
Even while the Japanese officials were desperately suing for peace, the Jews hastily ordered the dropping of a second atomic bomb, this one on Nagasaki, bringing off a second « test » of their Hellbomb against helpless non-combatants, as prescribed by the Book of Esther. Again, hundreds of thousands of civilians died horribly.
At last, the Jews had achieved the weapon which they planned to use to terrorize the entire world into subjecting itself to their insane frenzies and their frequently voiced goal of world domination of the « animals, » or non-Jews. As Chaim Weizmann boasted, « We will never actually have to use this atomic weapon in military operations as the mere threat of its use will persuade any opponent to surrender to us. »

EUSTACE MULLINS died on Feb. 2, 2010, just a month shy of his 87th birthday, having spent six decades of his titanic career dedicated to fighting the traditional enemies of Western civilization. A proud Virginian of old-line American stock (including American Indian heritage), Mullins — a longstanding fiiend of TBR publisher Willis Carto — was the author of literally thousands of articles and monographs and a dozen full-length books. Best known for his articulate dissection of the predatory international masters of money, Mullins was a protege of the famed American poet and social critic Ezra Pound who first directed Mullins’s attention to the intrigues of the Federal Reserve System. Mullins’ writings on the privately owned and controlled Federal Reserve remain the unchallenged standard on the topic, although many have sought to mimic his work.

Rothschild Influence This 1898 French caricature of a crowned Alphonse de Rothschild as a greedy, predator grasping the globe in his talon-like clutches, accurately portrays the way in which Europe’s Rothschild banking dynasty expanded its imperial hegemony. In America today, Rothschild influence –while paramount — is largely hidden, with some « respected » families and financial institutions — not all of them Jewish — acting as Rothschild « fronts. » Americans (and others) who dare to challenge the Rothschild empire (and the Zionist cause) are subjected to dirty tricks, economic boycott, harassment, persecution — even criminal prosecution.



THE JEWISH PEOPLE NOT ONLY « survived the holocaust, » but since World War II they have emerged as a political-economic cultural elite whose influence is rivaled by no other ethnic group on the face of the planet.

By Michael Collins Piper
Even the most cursory survey of the literature indicates that numerous « mainstream » Jewish writers and academics have reached a remarkable conclusion: the Jewish people-particularly American Jews-have today reached what may be a zenith of power unlike anything yet seen in Jewish history. American Jewish scholar Benjamin Ginsberg, writing in The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, summarized it well:
Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual, and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2% of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s largest newspaper chain and most influential single newspaper, The New York Times.
In the late 1960s, Jews already constituted 20% of the faculty of elite universities and 40% of the professors of elite law schools; today, these percentages doubtless are higher.
The role and influence of Jews in American politics is equally marked. Jews are elected to public office in disproportionate numbers. In 1993, 10 members of the U.S. Senate and 32 members of the House of Representatives were Jewish, three to four times their percentage of the general population. Jews are even more prominent in political organizations and in finance. One recent study found that in 27 of 36 campaigns for the United States Senate, one or both candidates relied upon a Jewish campaign chairman or finance director.
In the realm of lobbying and litigation, Jews organized what was for many years one of Washington’s most successful political action [organizations], the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and they play leadership roles in such important public interest groups as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Common Cause.
Their role in American economic, social and political institutions has enabled Jews to wield considerable influence in the nation’s public life ….
As a general rule, what can and cannot be said in public reflects the distribution of political power in society as Jews gained political power ….
Religious symbols and forms of expression that Jews find threatening have been almost completely eliminated from schools and other public institutions. Suits brought by the ACLU, an organization whose leadership and membership are predominantly Jewish, secured federal court decisions banning officially sanctioned prayers in the public schools and creches and other religious displays in parks and public buildings.[1]

« Today, the Jewish people — particularly American Jews — have reached what may be a zenith of power unlike anything yet seen in the annals of Jewish history. »

Many other Jewish American scholars have echoed Ginsberg and elaborated on his conclusions.
For example, in A Time for Healing: American Jewry Since World War II, Edward S. Shapiro writes of the remarkable Jewish success in achieving better education than most other Americans. According to Shapiro:
In the postwar era, America’s Jews became the best educated of any major American ethnic or religious group. By the mid-1970s, according to Father Andrew M. Greeley’s study Ethnicity, Denomination, and Inequality (1976), Jews averaged 14 years of education. This was a half year more than Episcopalians, the American religious group with the highest social standing. While less than one-half of Americans went on to college, more than 80 percent of Jews did so, and, as indicated by the statistics trom Harvard, Princeton and Yale, Jews were more likely to attend elite institutions. In 1971, for example, Jews made up 17 percent of the students at private universities.[2]
Shapiro has also remarked on the vast wealth accumulated by a small number of American Jews, pointing out that:

Beginning in the early 1980s, Forbes magazine published an annual compilation of the 400 richest Americans. Strictly based on their percentage of the general population, there should have been about 12 Jews on this list. Instead, there were over 100. Jews, who constituted less than 3 percent ofthe American people, made up over one-quarter of the richest Americans. They were over-represented by a factor of nine.
By contrast, ethnic groups that greatly outnumbered Jews — Italians, Hispanics, blacks, and Eastern Europeans — had few representatives on the list. The higher the category of assets listed by Forbes, the greater the percentage of Jews. Over 30 percent of American billionaires were Jewish …. It was possible that Forbes even underestimated the number of America’s super-rich Jews, since many of them had become wealthy in real estate, the most difficult of fields to gauge assets and the easiest in which to hide wealth. [3]

Research by Charles Silberman, writing in A Certain People, focuses on the vast and wide-ranging influence of this American Jewish elite:

According to a study of the ethnic and racial backgrounds of people listed in the 1974-75 edition of Who’s Who in America, Jews were two and a half times more likely to be included than members of the population at large. Relative to population, moreover, there were more than twice as
many Jews as there were people of English heritage, the group that once dominated the American elite.
In a 1971-72 analysis of a much smaller group ofleaders in some eight fields of endeavor, the sociologists Richard D. Alba and Gwen Moore found an even greater concentration. Of the 545 people studied, 11.3 percent were Jews-four times their proportion in the population as a whole….
The phenomenon is not limited to the United States. Jews make up about one percent of the population of Great Britain, but 6 to 10 percent of the British elite; in Australia, where Jews are 0.5 percent of the population, they constitute 5 percent of the elite …. [4]

« By contrast, ethnic groups that greatly outnumbered Jews — Italians, Hispanics, blacks, and Eastern Europeans — had few representatives on the list of the 400 richest Americans. »

Yet another Jewish writer, J. J. Goldberg, in Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, dares to admit that the Jews have also accumulated immense clout as far as the news media is concerned:

It is true that Jews are represented in the media business in numbers far out of proportion to their share of the population. Studies have shown that while Jews make up little more than 5 percent of the working press nationwide-hardly more than their share of the population-they make up one-fourth or more of the writers, editors, and producers in America’s « elite media, » including network news divisions, the top newsweeklies and the four leading daily papers (New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal).
In the fast-evolving world of media megacorporations, Jews are even more numerous. In an October 1994 Vanity Fair feature profiling the kingpins of the new media elite, titled « The New Establishment, » just under half of the two dozen entrepreneurs profiled were Jews. In the view of the magazine editors, these are America’s true power elite. [5]

Professor Norman F. Cantor, writing in The Sacred Chain: The History of the Jews, has summarized Jewish success and influence in a number of arenas:

It was the Jews, by and large, not the Italians, who created what later was called the Mafia. In the 1920s the Italians began to replace the Jews in the New York organized crime industry .. .. Jews were also prominent in the gambling trade and developed Las Vegas in the 1940s. [6]
Jewish academics and other intellectuals played the dominant role in the fashioning of the New Left culture of the 1960s and 1970s …. Often it was a blend of the imaginative cultural Marxism of Benjamin Adorno and the Frankfurt School of the 1930s with the more radical side of the Freudian tradition. [7]
The highly successful American feminist movement of the 1970s and 1980s involved Jewish leadership …. Perhaps the two most prominent personalities in the women’s movement, Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan, were Jewish. [8]
Jewish investment bankers played a major, perhaps predominant role in the frenetic Wall Street speculative ventures of the 1980s.[9] [In the 1980s] the skill of some Jewish billionaires in skirting the limits of the law but somehow emerging unscathed, with the aid of high-priced New York Jewish attorneys and a compliant press, was remarkable. [10]
As in Berlin and Vienna before Hitler, the Jewish role in publishing was an important one. By 1950 Jewish families owned two of the three most influential newspapers in the United States, the New York Times and the Washington Post. [11]
In 1994 Jews were only three percent of the American population but their impact was equivalent to an ethnic group comprising 20 percent of the population. [12]

Cantor’s overall assessment is remarkable, if not perhaps a bit eye-opening:

Nothing in Jewish history equaled this degree of Jewish accession to power, wealth and prominence. Not in Muslim Spain, not in early 20th century Germany, not in Israel itself, because there were no comparable levels of wealth and power on a world-class scale in that small country to attain.[13] The Morgans, the Rockefellers, the Harrirnans, the Roosevelts, the Kennedys, the titans of bygone eras, they have been superseded by the Jew as flawless achiever …. [14]

In light of all of this, perhaps it is time for the Jewish people to say « goodbye to the Holocaust » or other people might start thinking that the Jewish people have pushed the subject just a little bit too far.

[1] Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp. 1-2.
[2] Edward S. Shapiro, A Time for Healing (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), p. 100.
[3] Ibid., p. 117.
[4] Charles Silberman, A Certain People (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1985), pp. 143-144.
[5] J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power. (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1996), p. 280.
[6] Norman Cantor, The Sacred Chain (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), p. 389.
[7] Ibid., p,; 402.
[8] Ibid., p. 402.
[9] Ibid., p. 403.
[10] Ibid., p. 404.
[11] Ibid., p. 405.
[12] Ibid., p. 406.
[13] Ibid., pp. 406-407.
[14] Ibid., p. 418.

A journalist specializing in media critique, MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER is the author of Final Judgment, the controversial « underground bestseller » documenting the collaboration of Israeli intelligence in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also the author of The High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, Dirty Secrets, The Judas Goats, The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb, My First Days in the White House and The New Babylon. All are available from AMERICAN FREE PRESS and THE BARNES REVIEW. Call toll free at 1-877-773-9077 to order any of these books (except Final Judgment, which is out of print). He has lectured on the topics discussed in his books in places as diverse as Malaysia, Iran, Japan, Canada, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. Piper also currently has a daily radio program on the Republic Broadcasting Network. The Piper Report can be heard Monday thru Friday at 8 p.m. CST by going to and either tuning in live or accessing the voluminous show archives.

‘The New Babylon – Those Who Reign Supreme : A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religous and Economic Origins of the New World Order. Inside the Rothschild Empire – The New Pharisees’, by Michael Collins Piper (2009)

Buy Ebook

Buy on AmazonBuy on AFP



This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.