|TORONTO — “I am here to express our appreciation to Canada, its government and its people,” Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, , left, told The CJN on the weekend. “Canada is our best, most reliable friend in the world. And it is necessary to prove friendship by expressing appreciation to your friends.”|
19 sept. 2011 20h16 HE
La Presse canadienne
27 septembre 2011
Code criminel: Ottawa limitera à deux jours la deuxième lecture de la loi omnibus
Ottawa — Comme prévu, le gouvernement fédéral accélère l’étude de sa loi omnibus qui resserre plusieurs articles du Code criminel: le débat en deuxième lecture ne durera que deux jours.
L’opposition néodémocrate, qui s’attend à une pareille manœuvre à l’étape du comité parlementaire, dénonce cette guillotine.
«C’est une démarche extrême dans un Parlement, au terme d’un long débat. Le Parlement vient à peine de commencer», s’offusque le leader parlementaire du Nouveau Parti démocratique (NPD), Thomas Mulcair.
La loi omnibus a été déposée la semaine dernière. Les conservateurs avaient promis, durant la campagne électorale, que leurs engagements majeurs en termes de loi et ordre deviendraient lois en moins de 100 jours.
M. Mulcair reproche au gouvernement de ne pas donner une étude chiffrée des coûts des modifications proposées par sa loi. «On sait que ça va comporter une dépense massive pour les provinces. Les conservateurs ne veulent pas qu’on ait les vrais chiffres», accuse M. Mulcair.
Le gouvernement Harper est tombé au printemps dernier parce qu’il a été trouvé coupable d’outrage au Parlement pour avoir refusé, entre autres, de fournir à l’opposition le détail des coûts de ces projets de loi en matière de criminalité.
Will Canada’s social-democratic party be able to prevent a leadership coup?
(February 1, 2012)
On March 24, Canada’s New Democratic Party will do more than elect a new leader; it will face a test of character.
As it stands, the NDP is the only major national party not led by an avowed zionist. Stephen Harper leads a cabal of governing “Likudniks,” who value subservience to Israel above all else, and the interim leader of the “Labour-Zionist” Liberals, Bob Rae, is on the board of the Jewish National Fund, an organization so criminal that it has been condemned in Israel as racist.
The NDP, therefore, is the only apparently Canadian governing choice that voters have, but even this modest fig leaf will be blown away if the blatant Israel-firster Thomas Mulcair becomes party leader. On May 1, 2008, he told Canadian Jewish News: “I am an ardent supporter of Israel in all situations and in all circumstances.” [my emphasis]
Does Mulcair mean to say that he “ardently supports” Israel’s collective punishment of Palestinians, which includes torturing children, bulldozing homes, and keeping Palestinians near starvation levels as a matter of national policy? Do these constitute morally defensible “situations and circumstances?” Based on his abject endorsement of Israel, the answer is clearly, “yes.” The fact that all of the preceding are contrary to Canadian and international law, to say nothing of basic humanity, doesn’t faze Mulcair one bit. What a mensch!
How this walking advertisement for sedition found a home in a left-of-centre, social-democratic party is bizarre. The NDP, after all, still cleaves to the quaint notions that the federal government should defend the Constitution, uphold the rule of law, oppose military aggression, stand up for victims of human rights abuses, and generally serve the public good. Such high-minded ethical standards clearly distinguish it from both “Likud” and “Labour,” which are financially and politically indentured to the Israel Lobby.
So, why would the NDP even allow someone like Mulcair in the front door? This question takes on added significance when we recall that Mulcair had first considered joining Harper’s Likudniks, and was even said to have been tempted by a cabinet appointment. That would at least have made sense. When questioned last July about the earlier offer, though, the NDP’s newly minted interim leader Nycole Turmel seemed curiously unconcerned: “[Mulcair] was contacted by a number of people, a number of political parties and he chose to come work with us. He chose the NDP and I’m proud of that. He’s a great candidate.”
When looked at a bit more closely, however, Turmel’s praise for this crypto-Likudnik comes across more as a perfunctory platitude than a genuine endorsement; in this case the riding, not the MP, is the prize.
Mulcair represents Outremont, a small, wealthy riding on the Island of Montreal, which he won in a 2007 by-election, thus making him the NDP’s (ta-da!) first MP from Quebec to go on to win in a general election. Outremont has a substantial Jewish population, more than 20%; in the larger Labour riding of Mount Royal just to the south, represented by Israel-firster extraordinaire Irwin Cotler, it is 36%. If the NDP expects to make inroads into Quebec it is logical for it to compete for the Jewish vote, but how far is the NDP prepared to go to mortgage its principles for electoral advantage?
As party leader, Mulcair would be expected to protect his caucus colleagues from harassment and abuse from other parties, but in 2010 he sided with Labour and Likud to call for the resignation of fellow MP Libby Davies as NDP House Leader. Davies’s “crime” was to state that Israel’s occupation of Palestine began in 1948, not 1967. Her statement is a fact supported by historical documents that include admissions from leading political and military Israelis like David Ben Gurion and Gen. Moshe Dayan.
Mulcair’s contemptible attack on Davies’s basic freedom of expression, to say nothing of historical honesty, showed Mulcair’s true allegiance, and the threat he poses to this country. It doesn’t matter if he believes the zionist bilge he spews or whether he’s merely pandering to the Jewish community. By rights, he should be have been expelled from the party for his misconduct.
If you are reading this and are a member of the federal NDP who plans to cast a vote at the leadership convention, ask yourself these questions before you vote:
1) Can Mulcair be trusted to put loyalty to Canada and the NDP ahead of his loyalty to Israel?
2) Would Mulcair stifle his MPs’ freedom of expression in the name of being an “ardent supporter”of Israel?
3) Would Mulcair’s overt zionism irreparably debase the NDP’s reputation as a party of law and justice?
If you answered 1) no; 2) yes; and 3) yes, then you can proudly claim to be a member in good standing of a national, Canadian political party. You know what not to do on March 24. No matter how much you may like Mulcair’s position on the environment or any other issue, anyone who bullies his own people, betrays his party’s principles, and sells out his country is unfit to lead the NDP, much less sit in the House of Commons.
As I said earlier, the NDP appears to many voters to be the only viable Canadian governing option left in this country. Don’t force them into a no-win scenario among Likud, Labour and Meretz!
Canada Is Israeli Occupied Territory: Canada Competes With The US For Being The Biggest Israel Butt Kissers!
Le ministre canadien des Affaires étrangères: nous continuerons à soutenir l’État juif
Le ministre canadien des Affaires étrangères, John Baird, était l’invité d’honneur au Congrès annuel en faveur de la Liberté de Religion (Religious Liberty Dinner) qui s’est tenu la semaine dernière à Washington. Dans son discours devant les participants du congrès, le Ministre Baird a soutenu la politique pro-israélienne du gouvernement canadien; ainsi a reporté le journal « National Post ».
Sur ce blog: