The Jewish War Of Survival

http://cc.pbsstatic.com/xl/95/9795/9780906879795.jpg

by Arnold Leese

(founder of the Imperial Fascist League)

PREFACE
CHAPTER I « We Are Fighting In Defense of Freedom » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER II  » We Are Meeting a Challenge to Our Own Security » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER III « We are defending the rights of all Nations to live their own lives » and « fighting against the substitution of brute force for Law as the arbiter between Nations. » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER IV « We Are Fighting Against the Violation of the Sanctity of Treaties and Disregard of the Pledged Word » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER V « We Are Fighting Today for the Preservation of Christian Principles » (The (London) Times, 17th Feb. 1940)
CHAPTER VI « We Are Fighting As Our Fathers Fought to Uphold the Doctrine That All Men Are Equal In the Sight of God » (Franklin D. Roosevelt, 6th Jan. 1942)
CHAPTER VII « We Are Fighting for Democracy« 
CHAPTER VIII The Theory That High Finance Caused the War
CHAPTER IX The Object Is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism
CHAPTER X Unprepared and Blindfolded
CHAPTER XI Hitler Always Knew His Real Enemy
CHAPTER XII Hitler Wanted Peace With Britain
CHAPTER XIII How Britain Was Egged On to Make War
CHAPTER XIV The Jews Acknowledge Their Power and Threaten
CHAPTER XV The Jews Declare War
CHAPTER XVI The Jewish War
CHAPTER XVII The Peace: Britain Defeated Whoever Wins
CHAPTER XVIII Conclusion
Chapter VIII
THE THEORY THAT HIGH FINANCE CAUSED THE WAR
There is a school of thought which believes that International Finance with its preponderant Jewish interest and the Monetary System under which most of the world has suffered from mass unemployment was doomed to be superseded by Hitler’s credit system based upon a goods standard and international barter. This would displace gold, the tool of the Internationalists. I believe this myself.
But some go so far as to say that the war was brought about so that, if Hitler could be defeated, the Gold Standard Monetary System, which is fraudulent, could be maintained to the benefit of Wall Street and other large Gold Controllers.
 
I do not believe that.
It might be worth a war from the point of view of Wall Street, but it would not be worth this war. This war shows every trace of our having been dragged into it blindfolded and unprepared. Wall Street would not have allowed that. Wall Street knows that if the Germans won the war, there would be no more Wall Street.
In my opinion there was more to it than the survival of the fraudulent Gold Standard System. The necessities of racial survival made it urgent for the Jews to act without delay. Their considerable influence in Wall Street together with other participants in the spoils of the fraudulent system made it not too difficult to get the « Street » to support a war which was represented as inevitable.

This is not the place to go into the intricacies of monetary systems. The kernel of the problem is that credit based upon gold is insufficient for the needs of modern commerce. A short supply of money and credit is best for the usurer or money-lender, since scarcity raises the rate of interest borrowers must pay. Power to regulate the amount of money and credit available enables the controllers of Gold to dominate world affairs, economically and politically. The creation of inextinguishable national debts is part of the system of control and with control goes domination. This system of economic and financial bondage was doomed by the expansion of the barter system developed by National Socialist Germany. (For a more detailed explanation see the chapter, The Peace We Lost in A PEOPLE’S RUNNYMEDE, by Robert Scrutton, Andrew Dakers, publisher.)Chapter IX

The Object is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism

At last we approach facts.

Certainly we went to war with the object of destroying Fascism and Hitlerism. But the people were not allowed to know this till it was too late to withdraw, or they would not have sanctioned it, had they had an opportunity to do so. It was not Hitler or a Fascist form of Government that was objected to but that both opposed the Jewish influence in their domestic affairs.

President Roosevelt, in a letter to the International Labour Office Conference in 1944, said:

« The welfare of the world’s population and their liberty are the first and ultimate concern of those dedicated to root out from this earth every trace of Nazi ideas and Nazi methods. »

The London Times‘ leading article of 26th September 1939, said:

« We have gone to war with the single-minded determination to rid Europe of a particular menace whose presence is incompatible with the continuance of civilized life, and it is the simplicity of this claim that resolves what the Duce feels to be inconsistency in our discrimination between Hitler and his Russian accomplice. We believe that the Russian action, lawless and treacherous as we must declare it to be, is a secondary and subordinate consequence of the original crime. The Soviet has not been a party to Hitler’s previous outrages and has not shown itself to be in essence an aggressive power. »

The Duce was not the only man to see inconsistency in the discrimination in favour of the Soviets, despite this dead-lame explanation.

On plenty of other occasions, politicians have assured us that we are fighting to destroy Fascism. But they do not tell us why they deem it so necessary. There was a time when it did not appear to be a necessity to Winston Churchill. In his Great Contemporaries he wrote:

« Those who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile. »

Again in STEP BY STEP, Churchill wrote of Herr Hitler:

« If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. »

But of Russia, Churchill said in 1920:

« The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age. »

In a broadcast on 20th January 1940 he said:

« Everyone can see how Communism rots the soul of a nation . . . »

And later in the year on 1st April, he said:

« Communism is a deadly mental and moral disease. »

From this it is not understandable why Churchill should be leading the British Empire in a war to destroy National Socialism with the aid of Bolshevik Russia.

Of Italian Fascism, Churchill said in a speech on 11th November 1938:

« Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces and rallying the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilized society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism. »

As far back as 1926 the Financial News reported that a Committee of British Residents in Florence announced:

« We wish to state most clearly and emphatically that there exists here today nothing that can be justly termed either tyranny or suppression of personal freedom as guaranteed by constitutional law in any civilized land. We believe that Mussolini enjoys the enthusiastic support and admiration of the Italian people who are contented, orderly and prosperous to a degree hitherto unknown in Italy, and probably without parallel at the present time among other great European nations still suffering from the war. »

Sympathetic readers will smile when they are reminded that in 1933 the Financial Times brought out a special eight-page Supplement under the caption:

The Renaissance of Italy Fascism’s Gift of Order and Progress

The solution of the mystery is that in those days Fascism had not yet grappled with Jewish influences dominating the nation’s affairs. Giuseppe Toeplitz, Polish born Jew, had just retired from the management of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, which a New York Times dispatch from Milan on January 29, 1938 (the date of Signor Toeplitz’s death) estimated controlled one-seventh of all Italian industries.

We Fascists have noticed with amusement how our own Government is forced by the pressure of necessity to adopt many of the policies of Fascism. We may instance the recognition of Agriculture as basic among the industries; the necessity of ensuring that the Land is not misused by those farming it and the corporative organization of certain industries and professions.

The International Labour Office issued a report in April 1944 in which the activities of the German Labour Front established by Hitler were recommended to be « adapted for future use » after our victory. Facilities for workmen’s travel, recreation and other sparetime activities, for vocational training and research on labour protection; the « Beauty of Work » service — « Kraft durch Freude » (Strength through Joy) in the National Socialist Labor Program — and the Labour Bank, « one of the chief credit institutions . . . of the whole of Europe »; « it should also be the responsibility of the Labour Commissioners, » the Report of I.L.O. further outlines, « to continue all administrative services required for the administration of labor and social legislation — employment services, social insurance and the labour inspectorate. » The I. L. O. Philadelphia Labor Charter actually purloins direct from Fascism its notions of industrial organizations! « It insists, » says the London Times of 13th May 1944, « on the employers’ right to combine freely, and declares also that if workers and employers combine to run industry collectively, there must be a third element — the Government — to cooperate and see that the rest of the community is not exploited. » Similar proposals are found in the 1944 Report on Reconstruction issued by the Grand Council of the Trade Union Congress.

It was on these principles that the Fascist Corporative Organization of Industry was based! Then why should we be so keen to destroy all this? There can be but one plausible answer. National Socialism and Fascism opposed the Jewish influence in the domestic affairs of their respective countries. That we have ample proof that National Socialism and Fascism were good governments for the Germans and the Italians of their respective countries, apparently, is of no consideration. Is it that only Jewish interests matter the world over?

We may venture to doubt whether better Government for « liberated » Italy than the Fascist one can be achieved with the material at hand. Just consider this London Times report of the 25th April 1944:

« As most members of the new Cabinet are Republicans, a form of procedure was devised whereby Ministers, before taking oath, signed a declaration stating that they had accepted office with the purpose of serving the best interests of the country, but without attaching any permanent significance to the ceremony. »

It was from such « accommodating scoundrels » as this that Fascism saved Italy for twenty years. At the time of this writing, every so-called « liberated » country begins a campaign of violence and outrage against its most active anti-communist elements. The same conditions are at once reproduced from which their Fascist or semi-Fascist Governments of the past had saved them.

Leese Arnold – The Jewish War Of Survival

http://cc.pbsstatic.com/xl/95/9795/9780906879795.jpg
Author : Leese Arnold (Arnold Spencer Leese)
Title : The Jewish War Of Survival
Year : 1945Preface. I stood, as Mr. Richard Stokes, M. P., stood, for a negotiated peace, but, possibly, on vastly different grounds. Mr. Stokes was not interned, because he will not face the Jewish Menace. Since the beginning of the War, I did what little I could in favour of a negotiated peace, no matter which side was for the moment on top. I believe that the War was, from the National standpoint, a disaster — wrong and unnecessary. For holding similar views on other wars contemporary to them, such wellknown men as: Pitt, Fox, Bright, Lloyd George, Ramsay MacDonald and the present Home Secretary Herbert Morrison were not interned. There is of course a difference in my case, as I am attacking the Jews and they were not, and the Jew holds supreme power. I have attacked the Jews before and won a great moral victory over them. The Jews had me imprisoned for six months in 1936 for what was said to be a « public mischief » in that I mentioned in my paper, « The Fascist, » the subject of Jewish Ritual Murder. Evidently judging me by their own standards, they thought to frighten me into silence. When I came out of prison I published a book on the subject, and they honoured me by maintaining a silence so intense that it could almost be heard! They were afraid to advertise it by taking another action against me. I defied them successfully and the book has since been distributed all over the world. I hope therefore to do it successfully again. This War was Jewish and has never had any other object than the salvation of the Jews from Hitler. The first nine chapters of this book disprove the « causes » given from time to time by politicians and others for our being in a War which even the ignorant mob had sensed and labelled « phoney. » The Tenth Chapter deals with a half-truth prevalent amongst the better-informed. The rest of the book completes my case that the War was Jewish and that Britain was forced into it for Jewish purposes. The world has only seen one more stupendous bluff than this war, and that was Jewish too. ARNOLD LEESE

VIDEO – La déclaration de guerre Juive

De : HistoireVerite | 24 Jul 2011 | 553 vue(s)

Le 29 août 1939, Chaim Weizmann, futur président d’Israël, et à l’époque président de l’Agence Juive, déclara la guerre armée à l’Allemagne national-socialiste au nom des Juifs du monde entier.

Il envoya une lettre au gouvernement Britannique, lettre rendu public par le Times le 6 septembre 1939 (la France et la Grande-Bretagne ayant déclaré la guerre à l’Allemagne le… 3 septembre).

Dans la lettre, Weizmann précisait que « (…) les Juifs font cause commune avec la Grande-Bretagne et combattront dans le camp des Démocraties. (…) L’Agence Juive est prête à prendre des mesures immédiates pour utiliser la main d’œuvre Juive, la compétence technique et les ressources Juives. (…) »

Dès lors, les Juifs se retrouvèrent du statut de minoritaires indésirables à celui d’ennemis confirmés, susceptibles de ne pas participer à l’effort de guerre du Reich, voire d’y nuire, et cela explique en partie la déportation de ceux-ci dans les camps de concentration.

Car en effet, beaucoup de Juifs, en territoires occupés par les Allemands, participèrent activement à la résistance, que ce soit par sabotage, guérilla, ou en donnant de simples renseignements, résistance qui agissait, je le rappelle, à l’encontre des lois de la guerre.

Ainsi, Mr Steinberg, nous affirme que « les Juifs de Belgique (0 ,7% de la population), furent dans la résistance à raison de 10%, ce qui est énorme et logique. »

Généralement, les historiens affirment que la déclaration de guerre Juive n’aurait rien changé, que le destin des Juifs en Europe était déjà scellé. Mais ça n’est pas sûr du tout. On peut tout aussi bien affirmer le contraire. En fait, nous n’en savons rien.

Note :
– Le même Chaim Weizmann, le 3 décembre 1942, au Congrès Juif Mondial à New York : « Nous ne dissimulons pas et n’éprouvons aucune crainte à reconnaitre à la vérité, à savoir que cette guerre est notre guerre, et qu’elle a été entreprise pour la libération du peuple Juif. »

Organized Jewry, The Inciter of Global War and Genocide

by ZionCrimeFactory

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, we have been fed a crock of Jewish/Zionist dung-heap about the Second World War. Our governments, beholden to Jewish money and political influence, have been peddling fantasy stories as “truth”, fairy tales as “fact”, and preposterous fables as “history”, for seventy years straight. Our criminal governments have been lying to us and manipulating us into fighting senseless, catastrophic wars with the sole purpose of vanquishing the enemies of International Jewry, and thus paving the path for the Jewish takeover of the entire planet.
WWII — A Bloodbath For Jewish Benefit
It is a very difficult thing for Americans, Canadians, Brits, Australians, Frenchmen, and other Westerners, to come to terms with the fact that i) WWII was a senseless bloodbath that served no purpose other than to benefit the Jewish Power Elite in various ways, ii) that we were fighting on the wrong side, and iii) Hitler was right about everything. Call it pride, cognitive dissonance, or some combination of both — nobody likes to admit they were hoodwinked.

Despite popular belief, WWII did not start in September of 1939 with the British and French declaration of war against Germany; it actually started in 1933. In 1933, organized Jewry initiated a subversive economic war against Germany; a boycott of German goods designed to weaken and destroy Hitler’s National Socialist government.  The March 24, 1933, edition of England’s Daily Express newspaper ran the headline “Judea Declares War on Germany“. The article reported: “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.”
International Jewry formally declared its “holy war” against Germany long before Hitler began restricting the rights of Germany’s Jews. Jewry’s war declaration against Germany was issued by Samuel Untermeyer of the World Jewish Federation who said, in the New York Times of 7 Aug. 1933, that it would be means of an “economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.” The Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940, quoted Rabbi Maurice L. Perlzweig of the World Jewish Congress telling a Canadian audience that “the World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years.” The Jewish desire for war was admitted to by Rabbi Felix Mendelsohn in the Chicago “Sentinel” of 8 Oct. 1942 where he states: “The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” 
Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934 (also quoted in “Histoire de l’Armée Allemande” by Jacques Benoist-Mechin, Vol. IV, p. 303) said: “For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” In Les Nouvelles Litterairres, February 10, 1940, Schalom Asch is quoted as saying: “Even if we Jews are not physically at your side in the trenches, we are morally with you. This war is our war and you fight it with us.”
Chaim Weizmann, the late chairman of the World Zionist Organization and first president of Israel, made clear the genocidal Jewish intention to destroy Germany. In a letter to British PM Winston Churchill dated September 10, 1941, Weizmann spoke about how the Jews of the United States pulled the nation into the first World War, and he promised they could do it again, given that Britain fulfilled Zionist demands regarding Palestine. Weizmann wrote: “It has been routinely acknowledged by British statesman that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it — and may do it — again.” In a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York, Weizmann stated: “We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.”
The 24 July, 1942, edition of the American Hebrew Magazine made it plainly clear who brought America into the war when it declared that “whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur’s men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: the real reason that boy went to his death was because Hitler’s anti-semitic movement succeeded in Germany.”
Further proof Jews were behind the push for war on both sides of the Atlantic came in the form of a diary entry made by James Forrestal, who later became U.S. Secretary of Defense in the Truman administration. In his diary of 27 Dec. 1945 Forrestal notes that he played golf with Joseph Kennedy (father of JFK), FDR’s ambassador to Britain, who told him that ex-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain “stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into war.” In 1949, Forrestal was fired by President Truman and within two months was murdered (ruled a “suicide”) for his opposition to Zionism and the nascent state of Israel.

Likewise, Roosevelt was guided into the war by Jews. On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role in shaping American foreign policy. His secret reports said such things as:

“The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful …
… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe.
…the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda which is under Jewish influence…
…Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press.”

Roosevelt was surrounded by Jew advisers — rabid anti-German hatemongers and warmongers of the worst sort — such as Bernard Baruch, S. I. Rosenman, Sidney Weinburg, Sidney Hillman, Henry Morgenthau Jr., and Felix Frankfurter.
As Dr. Stephen Sniegoski points out in his book review of The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State:

“Jews also played a significant role in getting the United States into World War II to destroy their Nazi nemesis. And they worked actively to undermine popular noninterventionist resistance to war. For example, the Anti-Defamation League “employed investigative agents who secretly penetrated isolationist and anti-Semitic organizations and collected potentially damaging or incriminating information” which it turned over to the FBI and other federal agencies. (p. 110) Ginsberg does not develop this point, but given the fact that the overwhelming majority of “isolationists” were not enemy agents and were simply exercising their constitutional right to oppose a policy, it is apparent that activist American Jews have been quite willing to crush the civil liberties of others in order to advance their own goals. Jews also played a critical part in turning the media toward a prowar stance. (That was quite an achievement, since the American mood in the 1930s was strongly antiwar and “isolationist.”) In Hollywood, Jewish film makers concentrated on producing anti-Nazi propaganda films to prepare the masses for a crusade against evil.”

So, as has been clearly demonstrated, WWII was provoked by Jews and the blame for this catastrophic bloodbath of sixty million human beings lays squarely at the feet of International Jewry. Hitler did not start the war nor did he want war. To the contrary, Hitler made it clear that he was opposed to such a war, having witnessed first hand the hell of the first catastrophic world war. In 1945 Hitler stated: “It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.”
In fact, Jew lackey British PM Winston Churchill — who was a self-professed Zionist, a warmonger, a terrorist, and mass murderer –  flatly rejected peace offers from Hitler in 1939, 1940 and 1941. When Hitler’s number two man, Rudolf Hess, made his miraculous flight to Britain (having to crash land in Scotland) in 1941 to make peace and end the war, Churchill had him arrested and imprisoned for life. Undeniably it was the Jews, and their puppet politicians in America, France and Britain, who wanted war, and did everything they could to instigate and then prolong it.(…)
Jews throughout the world often screamed that National Socialist Germany was intent on ruling the world. The Jewish-controlled US press collectively referred to Germans as war-like barbarians and “Huns”. The Jew Theodore Kaufman, in his diabolical anti-Germanic hate screed, Germany Must Perish! (published in 1941), accused the Germans of pursuing a policy of world dominion and therefore advocated their complete annihilation and the territorial dissection of their nation. Kaufman chillingly wrote: “For it must be patent by now that while all the Germans may not approve of the means being employed by the Nazis in achieving German-world-dominion, they are practically unanimous in agreeing that that goal must, now or in the future, be definitely achieved by Germany. Were the German nations to win this war, not one German would hesitate laying claim to a share in the loot … Yet defeat will on no account erase their desire to conquer and rule the world. There is only one way to frustrate such a desire: the goal of world-dominion must be removed from the reach of the German and the only way to accomplish that is to remove the German from the world!” (Kaufman, Theodore. “Germany Must Perish!”, Argyle Press. 1941)
This is a classic case of Jewish psychological projection, considering that it has always been the chief objective of the Jewish religion to rule the earth and acquire all earthly treasures and possessions; thereby making all Gentiles into subservient slaves to the Jews. It is the Jews, not the Germans, who desire world domination, as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have made perfectly clear. Not only is Jewish world dominion elucidated in the Protocols (which have undoubtedly proven to be authentic, despite endless Jewish kvetching to the contrary) but in all ancient Judaic religious texts — the Torah, Talmud, books of the Zohar and Kaballah. Prominent Jewish rabbis from Israel are quite open about their sinister desire to murder and enslave non-Jews.
The Zionist Hand Behind Middle-East Wars

The genocidal destruction that has rained down on the middle-east for the past decade was launched at the behest of a small cadre of conniving Jewish-Zionist ideologues who call themselves “neoconservatives.” The brainchild of three Jewish Communists (“Trotskyites”) Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz and Leo Strauss, neoconservatism is — and has always been — a Jewish movement, led by Zionist motivations and for Zionist gain.
An article written by Gal Beckerman in the Jewish daily news magazine, The Forward, opined: “Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War (with extra points if it’s Pat Buchanan doing the acknowledging). But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. It’s a thought one imagines most American Jews, overwhelmingly liberal, will find horrifying. And yet it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants’ grandchildren.
Jewish political scientist, Benjamin Ginsberg, acknowledged that neoconservatism was essentially a product of Jewish tribalism: “One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right’s hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel’s security.”
Irving Kristol, the Jewish “godfather” of the neoconservative movement let slip the Israeli-centric agenda of his nefarious ideology when, in 1973, he stated: “Senator McGovern is very sincere when he says that he will try to cut the military budget by 30%. And this is to drive a knife in the heart of Israel… Jews don’t like big military budgets. But it is now in the interests of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States… American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.”
Fellow neoconservative godfather Norman Podhoretz has made similar statements about using American military prowess to protect Israel. Leo Strauss, also a Jewish Zionist and early neocon “intellectual,” advocated the perpetual deception of the public by those in power for a “greater good.” This “greater good” that he spoke of was what was good for the Jews, not the Gentiles among whom they live. Noam Chomsky has argued that Strauss’s theory is a form of Leninism, in which society should be led by a group of elite vanguards, whose job is to protect liberal society against the dangers of excessive individualism, and creating inspiring myths to make the masses believe that they are fighting against anti-democratic and anti-liberal forces. Journalists, such as Seymour Hersh, have opined that Strauss endorsed noble lies, “myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive society.”
Jewish neocon genocidists like to speak in public about “global crusades for democracy,” but this is just a clever ruse to deceive the “Goyim” about their real agenda which is to bolster the hegemonic status of Israel in the middle-east ensemble. The Jew William Kristol (son of Irving Kristol), editor of the Weekly Standard, explained the real reason for the disingenuous rhetoric about global democracy to the Jerusalem Post (27th July 2000): “I’ve always thought it was best for Israel for the US to be generally engaged and generally strong, and then the commitment to Israel follows from a general foreign policy.”

Two of Leo Stauss’s more notable protégé’s were none other than Jewish Iraq war architect, Paul Wolfowitz, and Abram Shulsky. Shulsky was the Jewish Straussian who was appointed head of the Office of Special Plans by fellow Jewish neocon Douglas Feith (then Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in the Pentagon). This office supplied the major portion of the fraudulent “intelligence” that was used by the Bush administration to justify the war against Iraq. It has been proven that the Zionist propaganda entity embedded within the Pentagon, the Office of Special Plans, worked closely with Israel to cook up the “Iraq WMD threat to America” hoax.
The phony “threat” of Iraq possessing or attempting to possess and wield “weapons of mass destruction” was cunningly contrived by Israel and its vast network of Jewish “sayanim” operatives in America who formed a tight conglomeration of neoconservative “think tanks”, such as the Project for a New American Century, American Enterprise Institute, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, among many others, who were behind all of the propaganda, conjecture and lies that led to the disastrous Zionist proxy war to behead the Iraqi nation for Israel’s benefit in 2003.
Israel’s sayanim operatives had also burrowed their way into the top echelons of the Bush Administration and the Pentagon — namely Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Eliot Abrams, Abram Shulsky, Lewis Libby, Ari Fleischer, David Frum, Eliot Cohen, Joshua Bolten, Marc Grossman and many others — thus enabling these inhuman Zionist war-hawks to set US foreign policy at the drop of a dime. In fact, the Bush Administration was infested with dual Israeli-American citizens; forty-two of them to be exact. Many of these Jews had extensive links to the Jewish-Israeli lobby (AIPAC, AJC, ADL, ZOA, etc) and to the Sharon regime in Israel.
It’s not exactly a secret that the neocons are mostly Jews whose loyalty lies with the Zionist state, not America. Ari Shavit, a writer for Israel’s Haaretz Daily News Service, proudly proclaimed that:

“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.”

It’s incredible to see some people still trying to deny this.
This lunatic Zionist agenda for mid-east destruction goes back much further than many people realize. In 1996, a militarist Israeli “thank tank” called the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), authored a policy paper for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister, the crazed Arab-hating war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm“. Within this damnable Zionist strategy paper we find the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi Ba’athist regime being advocated as an “important Israeli strategic objective”, as well as calls for the toppling of the governments of Iran and Syria. Their grand strategy was aimed at replacing the governments of these countries with Israel-friendly stooges. Three of the authors of this warmongering paper were none other than Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser — all of whom became top ranking members of the Bush Administration in 2001 eagerly pushing for an American war with Iraq. The Clean Break paper was essentially a continuation of an earlier proposal by Zionist extremist Oded Yinon called “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s” (published in 1982). Yinon wickedly suggested that the Arab States should be destroyed from within by exploiting their internal religious and ethnic tensions. These cold-blooded Israeli Geo-political strategists envisioned that by weakening Israel’s external enemies they could thereby weaken Israel’s internal enemies, i.e. the native Palestinians.

The ultra-militaristic Project for a New American Century group — which many people suggest was the prime mover in shaping the post-9/11 American-led war agenda in the middle-east — was essentially an offshoot of the Israeli IASPS, and was headed by Jewish neocon heavyweights William Kristol and Robert Kagan. In one of the group’s deranged “studies” in September of 2000, PNAC released a report entitled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century”, which called for a “New Pearl Harbor” in order to galvanize the American masses behind illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and a broader war against the entire Arab/Muslim world. It chillingly stated, “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic catalyzing event — like a New Pearl Harbor.” At least half the members of the PNAC group were Jewish. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and the American Enterprise Institute were also instrumental in the deceptive propaganda campaign that led to the war in Iraq. Both groups were Jewish-financed and run operations.
Another important piece to this Zionist puzzle is the Jonathan Institute, a maniacal Zionist “think tank” set up in 1979 by former and current Israeli prime minister’s Menachem Begin (terrorist/mass murderer, former head of the Irgun) and Benjamin Netanyahu. This group of Israeli terror planners held a series of conferences throughout the 1980s and derived its name from Bibi Netanyahu’s late brother Jonathan Netanyahu, who was killed in the Israeli raid on Entebbe airport in Uganda in the 1970s. This coterie of Zionist crooks endeavored to promote their genocidal fantasies of a “clash of civilizations” between the West and Israel’s Arab/Islamic adversaries and also effectively publicized their desire for Western powers to adopt their espoused doctrine of “preemptive retaliation,” the Israeli policy of killing those designated as “terrorists” before they can act. Begin, Netanyahu and other international Jewish terror masters, attempted to seduce Western leaders to join their sadistic effort to fragment and destabilize the middle-east so as to make it safer for Israel and ripe for Israeli plundering.

Netanyahu published a book in 1986 entitled, Terrorism: How the West Can Win, which was a collection of essays from himself and like-minded Zionist gangsters who harbored grandiose dreams of the annihilation of Arabs and Muslims who get in the way of the Likud Party’s strategic objectives. Netanyahu’s book basically lays out the frame-work for what is now generally known as the “war on terror”, and contains all of the vocabulary and discourse that didn’t enter our lexicon until after the suspicious events of 9/11. This book is undoubtedly a key piece of evidence that the “war on terror” is a Zionist-engineered scam for global Jewish hegemony.
The Jewish Neocons — who had been lurking over capital hill like hawks for decades, running their sleazy Zionist propaganda outfit magazines and periodicals such as The Weekly Standard and The New Republic — had for years been unsuccessful in their ceaseless pursuit to drag America into another war in the middle-east, following the first Persian-Gulf war in 1991. Nobody was buying their lies that Iraq posed an imminent danger to America. But that all changed on September 11, 2001.
The catalyst for this current state of perpetual warfare between the West and Israel’s Islamic enemies was, of course, 9/11; the “new pearl harbor” event that the PNAC Zionists had been lusting for to realize their wet-dreams of endless warfare.
Pitting the West against the Islamic Middle-East in a prolonged battle was something that Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak and the then Israeli PM Ariel Sharon publicly called for within an hour of the terrorist spectacle that struck America on that fateful day; a testament to the true authors of the day’s horrific events. An event that Benjamin Netanyahu mockingly proclaimed was a “good thing for Israel … will bring immediate sympathy [for Israel’s cause].” An event that genocidaire, Ariel Sharon, dubbed Israel’s “Hanukkah miracle.” An event which Israeli political analyst Ehud Sprinzak candidly described as “the most important public relations act ever committed” in favor of the Jews and Israel.
Of course, for those of us who have actually studied the subject of 9/11, we know who the real perpetrators were. The former head of Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service (Hamid Gul), the 25 year German SPD parliamentarian and author of several books on the secret operations of intelligence agencies (Andreas Von Bulow), the former President of Italy (Francesco Cossiga), as well as the former director of studies of the US Army War College (Dr. Alan Sabrosky), all unanimously concur that the Israeli Mossad conducted 9/11 as a false-flag attack to kick-start this long-planned “clash of civilizations” that Zionists had been so zealously lobbying for, for decades.
(For more information about the Jewish origins and Zionist machinations of the neoconservative movement that engineered the Iraq War, see Michael Collins Piper’s book, The High Priests of War, and Dr. Stephen Sniegoski’s book, The Transparent Cabal. Also recommended are the two excellent documentaries, “War By Deception” and “Missing Links“, which comprehensively expose the Zionist cabal behind 9/11 and the 9/11 wars.)
Jewish Neocons and the HoloHoax

There is an interesting connection between Jewish neoconservatism and the fictitious ‘Holocaust’ religion. The Jewish Mafia’s preposterous anti-German conspiracy theory — known to the world as The Holocaust™ — is central to neoconservative thinking.
Jewish journalist Gal Beckerman had this to say about the motivations of Jewish neoconservatives:

“It was Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous vic-tory.” By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good for the Jews?”
Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations” on anitisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.”

As that article demonstrates, one of the main motivating factors behind the policies advocated by neoconservative ideologues was protecting the Jews from “another holocaust.” Of course, what this article won’t tell you is that the alleged ‘holocaust’ of Jews during WWII did not, and could not have scientifically, mathematically, possibly ever occurred. Nor did any of the dozens of other “holocausts” or “imminent holocausts” of “six million Jews” that Jewish-Zionist and Jewish-Communist propagandists had been incessantly promoting in the press dating back to the late 19th century.
Interestingly, the main Zionist architect of the savage Iraq War, Paul Wolfowitz, was heavily influenced by the fraudulent mythology of Holocaustianity. According to Shelemyahu Zacks, Paul Wolfowitz’ father, Jacob Wolfowitz, “fought … for the liberation of Soviet Jewry. He was a friend and strong supporter of the state of Israel, AIPAC member and had many friends and admirers there.” Paul Wolfowitz’s wikipedia article asserts that he was, “Strongly influenced by his father, Paul Wolfowitz became “a soft-spoken former aspiring-mathematician-turned-policymaker … [whose] world views … were forged by family history and in the halls of academia rather than in the jungles of Vietnam or the corridors of Congress … [His father] … escaped Poland after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust.” Wolfowitz may have lost some family in WWII, as did tens of millions of other people, but his relatives certainly didn’t die in a “homicidal gas chamber” because such claims are a tissue of fabrication.
Wikipedia tells us that Wolfowitz read about the HoloHoax and Hiroshima as a boy and calls them “the polar horrors”. Speaking of the influence of the HoloHoax on his views, Wolfowitz said: “That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views … It’s a very bad thing when people exterminate other people [except, of course, when Jews exterminate Palestinians or when Allied troops exterminated Germans or when Jewish Communists exterminated Russians and Ukrainians or when American troops exterminate Arabs and Muslims on behalf of Israel — ZCF], and people persecute minorities. It doesn’t mean you can prevent every such incident in the world, but it’s also a mistake to dismiss that sort of concern as merely humanitarian and not related to real interest.”
Another key architect of the Iraq War, sleazeball Zionist genocidist Richard Perle, is seen in  THE WAR PARTY (BBC documentary | May 2003), saying how the HoloHoax has shaped his worldview and is essentially the motivating factor that drives his insidious warmongering on behalf of Israel. At the 16:49 mark of the video, Perle says: “the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.”
It is supremely axiomatic that the “big lie” of “Iraqi WMD” that was used to justify the war against Iraq was conjured up by, in essence, the same caliber of cunning Jew propagandists that conned the world into believing in the “big lie” of “German WMD” (the gas-chambers myth). The shared mindset of people like Perle, Wolfowitz, and other Jewish neocons, is that the HoloHoax justifies Israel’s existence, it justifies US support for Israel, and it justifies endless wars against Arab/Muslim nations for Israel’s “security.”

The Zionist-trumpeted myth of ‘Iraqi WMD’ has been dismantled and is believed by very few people today (with the possible exception of Sean Hannity). However, the myth of ‘German WMD’ (gas-chambers lie) is still very much believed by the majority of the mind-controlled Western populace, because that propaganda has been so relentless and intensively force-fed to people since a young age. Not only that, but it is actually illegal to challenge the claims of the HoloHoax in a dozen countries in Europe — no wonder so many people believe it, in many countries they are forced to by law! Europeans who bravely refuse to blindly accept and adhere to the conformist dogma of this hoax run the risk of heavy fines and even imprisonment! Truth doesn’t need laws to protect it from scrutiny, but lies do.
Once the holocaust myth is finally dismembered on a wide scale, then all of the fraudulent justifications Jewish Neocons give to generate support for Israel and global Jewry in all of their villainous endeavors, will collapse like a house of cards.
The First Gulf War, Atrocity Propaganda and the HoloHoax

There is also an interesting correlation between the first Gulf War, atrocity propaganda and the HoloHoax.
The late American-Jewish congressman Tom Lantos, a Hungarian “HoloHoax survivor” and rabid Zionist, was the mastermind behind another series of atrocity lies which led the US down the path of endless wars in the middle-east on behalf of Israel. Tom Lantos’ Congressional Human Rights Caucus held a hearing after the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in 1991. Lantos’ Human Rights Caucus presented “(lie)witnesses” who spoke about alleged atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait. It was revealed months after this hearing successfully pushed America into the first Gulf War, that the whole thing was a scripted hoax! The entire saga was concocted with the help of the public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton.
The testimony that clinched the war resolution that barely passed in the Senate in a 52-47 vote, was delivered by a young Kuwaiti girl who appeared anonymous at the hearing, known to the public only as “Nayirah”. She claimed to have witnessed Iraqi troops come into a Kuwaiti hospital with guns, who then proceeded to remove dozens of babies from their incubators — stole the incubators — and left the babies to die on the cold floor. This never happened. “Nayirah” spoke perfect American English (likely lived in the US her whole life) and turned out to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. This disgraceful and corrupt young woman was nothing less than a paid actor, coached in the art of deception, who tearfully recited a rehearsed pro-war propaganda script prepared for her by her Zionist paymasters. This hoax atrocity story was widely publicized by mainstream media outlets and Kuwaiti officials repeated these lies at the United Nations in their campaign to elicit Western intervention in their struggle with Saddam Hussein.
The “Kuwaiti incubators hoax” essentially provided the casus belli for American intervention in the first Gulf War. Evidently, child atrocity stories are an effective pro-war propaganda tool because of their ability to garner anger from the public, which is why Jews are so fond of telling grotesque tall tales of Nazis ripping babies in half with their bare hands. Is it any surprise that Lantos (being the experienced liar that he is) was one of the highlighted stars of Steven Spielberg’s Holocaust Hoax documentary, “The Last Days”? A counter-documentary which exposes the lies of Spielberg’s hate film was released earlier this year titled “The Last Days of the Big Lie“; I encourage everyone to watch it.

It is hardly surprising that during the first Zionist-contrived Gulf War deceitful Jews laughably attempted to resurrect the WWII “homicidal gas chambers” myth and project it onto Iraq. The New York based Jewish Press, then calling itself “the largest independent Anglo-Jewish weekly newspaper,” wrote on its title page on February 21, 1991: “IRAQIS HAVE GAS CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS” The front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles and distributed in 381,065 copies, was: “GERMANS PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”
Nobody took those claims seriously, and they obviously weren’t true. But it illustrates the reckless disregard Jews have for historical truth and accuracy. Time and time again we see mendacious Jews carelessly trying to elicit sympathy from the public using lies, even resorting to resurrecting past false propaganda narratives to malign their new enemies (the Arabs and Muslims) with. It’s been over 60 years since WWII, you’d think these scoundrels would have come up with some new lies and slanders by now. It seems that any time the Jews want to demonize someone they march up to the old “attic of Jewry” where they keep all the atrocity propaganda albums and highlight reels, lift off the shelf the first ancient Aggadah fable they can find, dust it off, and use it once again. If it doesn’t work the first time, they try again and again until it finally sticks. I guess the Jews aren’t as sophisticated as some might think.
Conclusion
Countless times, non-Jews — mesmerized by subversive propaganda — have been duped into going to war against the Jews’ enemies. Unmistakeably, the main tool of the Jew to accomplish his sinister ends is the power of propaganda and mass persuasion through atrocity lies. The television and news-media is their greatest weapon because with those elements under their firm control they are able to shape what the public thinks and feels; thereby shaping what people do. Multitudinous millions of Gentiles have fought, killed and died in wars instigated by International Jewry, aided and abetted by Gentile pawns and stooges who sell out their own people for short-term monetary gain and political power.
Ostensibly, the Jews have attained their current position as global hegemon and world dictator through the instigation of wars and revolutions — pitting Gentiles against Gentiles. As we are busy killing each other, the Jews merrily count their shekels all the way to the bank. In the end, it is people’s innate naivety, as well as their susceptibility to be deceived and misled by emotive atrocity stories, that affords the Jews a smooth ride to world supremacy. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late. Either accept the truth now, and inform others about it, or face slavery!

Share

La majorité des victimes de mesures génocidaires durant et après la guerre étaient allemandes

Jeudi 9 février 2012
via konigsberg
http://www.alt-rehse.de/bilder/vertreibung.jpg

8 mai 1945: c’est la fin des hostilités en Europe. Cependant, aussi choquant que cela puisse paraître aujourd’hui, la guerre contre l’Allemagne se poursuit. Roosevelt, Staline et Churchill ont décrété que le peuple allemand devait souffrir et c’est exactement ce qui se produisit. Expulsés de leurs maisons, dépouillés de leurs biens, décimés par la famine et la maladie, violés, volés, emprisonnés et réduits en esclavage, des millions d’Allemands — en majorité des femmes et des enfants — vont subir ce que le magazine Time qualifiera de « paix la plus terrifiante de l’histoire ».

File:Nürnberg Denkmal Flucht und Vertreibung 5.jpg


Cruelles Moissons fut l’un des premiers ouvrages publiés aux États-Unis à tenter d’alerter l’opinion publique sur la guerre menée par les Alliés contre les Allemands après le 8 mai 1945. Appuyé sur les documents de l’époque et rempli d’une indignation à la fois humanitaire et patriotique, ce classique ose dévoiler de quelle façon les responsables politiques américains et alliés entreprirent la destruction politique, économique et sociale du peuple allemand dans le même temps qu’ils prétendaient lui enseigner la « justice » et la « démocratie ». Le constant est accablant.

Aujourd’hui, alors que la guerre de la propagande fait toujours rage contre les Allemands dans les médias et jusque dans les universités, Cruelles Moissonsnous parle d’une période honteuse oubliée des Français et de la plupart des Européens qui mérite d’être rappelée dans sa réalité et non certains esprits pieux voudraient nous la raconter.

Cruelles MoissonsRalph Franklin Keeling
http://librairiefrancaise.fr/img/p/104-147-large.jpg

L’épuration ethnique des Allemands en Europe centrale et orientale, 1945-1948
Heinz NawratilEntre 2 et 3 millions d’Allemands sont morts après la seconde guerre mondiale, au coeur de l’Europe, victimes d’une des plus terribles épurations ethniques de l’histoire. On a pu parler à ce propos de véritable génocide. Mais c’est un génocide presque totalement occulté. Il s’agit de la première synthèse en langue française consacrée au sujet des expulsions des Allemands après 1945. L’auteur y relate le déroulement des faits pays par pays, établit un bilan chiffré des massacres et des pertes démographiques, analyse les mobiles de ceux, individus et États, qui ont participé aux crimes de l’expulsion. Il s’interroge enfin sur les raisons du silence assourdissant qui règne en Occident autour de cette somme effroyable de souffrances humaines. « Ce livre est un pavé de 300 pages dans la mare de notre conformisme et de nos habitudes historiques. […] Il est extrêmement bien documenté et il laissera sa trace dans les livres d’histoire » (Histoire événement, janvier 2002). Un « ouvrage fondamental » (Nouvelle Revue d’Histoire, n° 2, septembre-octobre 2002).

Dans Le livre noir de l’expulsion (paru en Allemagne en 1999), unique en son genre en langue française sur ce thème, Heinz Nawratil retrace le calvaire des 20 millions d’Européens de l’Est d’origine allemande (parfois installés depuis plus de quatre cents ans) qui durent fuir l’Armée rouge ou furent expulsés. Cette expulsion eut son cortège macabre de meurtres, viols et tortures commis par les troupes soviétiques, les milices polonaises, les résistants tchèques et les partisans yougoslaves. De 2 à 3 millions y trouvèrent alors la mort.
L’auteur démontre que l’épuration ethnique des Allemands en Europe centrale et orientale de 1945 à 1948 ne visait pas seulement les fonctionnaires nationaux-socialistes, les membres et sympathisants du parti, mais l’ensemble des Allemands (hommes, femmes, enfants, vieillards, malades extraits des hôpitaux) rabaissés à l’état de sous-hommes. Cette accumulation de crimes révèle “un plan d’extermination et d’expulsion des Allemands” des territoires de l’Est savamment préparé par certains cercles dirigeants de l’URSS et des autres États socialistes…
On a pu parler à ce propos de véritable génocide. Mais c’est un génocide presque totalement occulté. Il s’agit de la première synthèse en langue française consacrée au sujet des expulsions des Allemands après 1945. L’auteur y relate le déroulement des faits pays par pays, établit un bilan chiffré des massacres et des pertes démographiques, analyse les mobiles de ceux, individus et États, qui ont participé aux crimes de l’expulsion. Il s’interroge enfin sur les raisons du silence assourdissant qui règne en Occident autour de cette somme effroyable de souffrances humaines.
 
Flüchtlinge im Zweiten Weltkrieg
Tous ces crimes d’après guerre n’ont jamais été reconnu par les salauds qui gouvernèrent l’Europe depuis 1945. Et Dieu de miséricorde dans tout ça ? absent, indifférent comme d’habitude !…
Trois idées-force peuvent être retenues :
  • 1 – La vérité historique est indivisible. Les crimes contre l’humanité, surtout lorsqu’ils ont l’ampleur et l’importance d’un génocide, restent des crimes quelle que soit l’identité de leurs auteurs et responsables.… La mise au jour des chapitres les plus sombres de l’histoire humaine, sans égard pour la nationalité des responsables de cette tragédie, est un commandement de la vérité et de la justice ; elle seule peut poser les bases d’un pardon mutuel et d’une compréhension authentique. (Ludwig Martin, avocat général en retraite, président d’honneur de la Société internationale pour les droits de l’homme). (Préface)
  • 2 – Le cours des esclaves était bas. Près d’un million de civils allemands furent ainsi déportés vers des camps de travail dans des conditions inhumaines. Parmi ceux qui avaient été déportés au titre des réparations (c’était le groupe de déportés le plus important), 45 % moururent, quasiment la moitié. Le gouvernement soviétique alla chercher ses esclaves dans plusieurs pays de l’Europe de l’Est, notamment en Roumanie, en Hongrie, en Pologne et dans les anciens Etats baltes. …Près de 10% des déportés périrent de faim, de froid et de mauvais traitements au cours de leur transport vers la Russie ; généralement en queue de train, deux wagons étaient réservés aux morts du convoi. …On estime qu’à la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale, au moins douze millions de personnes, Russes et étrangers, civils et prisonniers de guerre, peuplèrent le monde lugubre des camps de travail soviétiques, l’archipel du goulag. (Chapitre Les victimes de l’armée rouge, La déportation et les travaux forcés, p. 52-53)
3 – Pour chiffrer les pertes de l’après-guerre consécutives à l’expulsion, l’Office fédéral de la statistique (de la RFA) s’attacha à retrancher du bilan démographique toutes les pertes de guerre (soldats tombés au front, victimes des bombardements, etc.) Il est parvenu aux chiffres suivants : Pertes allemandes dues à l’expulsion (abstraction faite des Allemands de Russie et de la population provenant d’autres régions ; tous les chiffres sont arrondis)… Soit un total d’environ 2.230.000 victimes.
 
 
http://www.planet-wissen.de/politik_geschichte/nachkriegszeit/flucht_und_vertreibung/img/intro_vertreibung3_01_g.jpg
 

Récit succinct des souffrances de la Silésie en 1945-1946Johannes Kaps

Un déferlement de violence plongea la Silésie en 1945 dans les ténèbres de l’Apocalypse. Les gens de ce pays semblaient promis à l’anéantissement. Les défenseurs épuisaient leurs dernières forces. Des soldats cruels, obéissant aveuglément aux mots d’ordre de la propagande soviétique, forcèrent les portes des domiciles. Leur volonté de détruire anéantit non seulement l’œuvre des hommes de cette terre mais empoisonna aussi la source de toute vie humaine en faisant des femmes un véritable gibier pour la satisfaction de leurs instincts lubriques. La Silésie fut en ce temps-là une arène de martyrs et nul ne sait combien de femmes silésiennes et de l’Allemagne orientale ontpréféré perdre leur vie plutôt que de sacrifier volontairement leur chasteté.

Témoignages, 1945-1946Vers la fin de la dernière guerre, on vit se dérouler en Europe centrale une tragédie qui toucha 15 millions d’êtres humains. Que ceux-ci aient été coupables, deprès ou de loin, ou innocents, ils ont été expulsés de leur lieu d’origine de la façon la plus inhumaine, de Prusse occidentale et orientale, de Dantzig, de Poméranie, de Silésie, du pays des Sudètes, comme de Roumanie et de Hongrie, de territoires où leurs ancêtres avaient habité depuisprès de mille ans, après avoir défriché le pays et construit des villes et des villages. Sous la forme d’une expulsion en masse, sansprécédent dans l’histoire, ces millions de gens ont été tenus, dans un mouvement de haine collective, pour responsables de ce qu’avaient fait quelques individus et ont été jetés sur les routes. Au cours de leur fuite des millions d’êtres ont péri, victimes de la faim et du froid, fusillés ou abattus. Des centaines de milliers d’autres sont morts dans leur pays dévasté ou en déportation. Le sort des femmes, des enfants, des vieillards, des malades et des blessés fut horrible. Le but duprésent ouvrage paru au début des années cinquante était de faire connaître au public allemand les actes d’humanité et d’entraide des ressortissants des nations en guerre avec l’Allemagne au bénéfice des populations expulsées pendant leur exode. Une grande partie des récits publiés ici concerne les soldats français qui, rentrant de leur captivité en Prusse orientale, en Poméranie, en Silésie, au pays des Sudètes, accompagnèrent les convois de réfugiés. Les gens, simples pour la plupart, qui ont écrit ces récits, ont eu à coeur, avant tout, d’apporter à ceux qui les avaient aidés le témoignage que ce qu’ils ont fait reste inoubliable en Allemagne. Les textes parfois émouvants qu’on lira dans ce recueil ne sont pas seulement des « témoignages d’humanité ». Ils montrent qu’aux jours les plus sombres l’étincelle ne s’est pas éteinte. Ce sont aussi et avant tout des « témoignages de reconnaissance » envers des Américains, des Belges, des Danois, des Français, des Polonais, des Russes, des Slovaques et des Tchèques. Ce sont enfin des « témoignages » de ces rencontres d’homme à homme, au-delà de l’abîme creusé par les erreurs et la fatalité.

Zgoda
Une station sur le chemin de croix silésien

Sepp Jendryschik

Zgoda, c’est le nom d’un camp de Pologne où, à partir de 1945, des membres de la minorité allemande furent internés (hommes, femmes, mais aussi enfants et vieillards). Son commandant, un certain Salomon Morel, était juif ; il prétendait avoir survécu à Auschwitz. Animé par un désir frénétique de vengeance, il tortura effroyablement les prisonniers, notamment ceux qui étaient enfermés dans la « maison brune » (réservée aux anciens SA, SS et autres membres des Jeunesses hitlériennes ou du NSDAP).

Jewish Polnischer KZ Kommandant Salomon Morel


En quelques mois, plusieurs milliers d’internés moururent d’épuisement, sous les coups ou par suicide, incapables de supporter davantage les traitements inhumains. La plupart furent enterrés dans d’immenses charniers aujourd’hui nivelés. L’ouvrage de Sepp Jendryschik offre le grand mérite de nous rappeler ces atrocités occultées par les vainqueurs de la seconde guerre mondiale.
https://www.in-die-zukunft-gedacht.de/icoaster/files/vertriebenen_trek_1945_akg_74957.jpg
Il n’existe bien entendu pas de photos de ces millions de crimes abominables commis par les vainqueurs de la seconde guerre mondiale, pour qui seule la shoah a existé et a le droit de citer.
.

Plus de détails:

Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a remporté la Seconde guerre mondiale


VIDEO – International Jewry Won WW2 Their Purim

Shocking Revelations Emerge in New Book
• Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh and America’s Fight Over World War II, 1939-1941

By Michael Collins Piper

Until a few years ago, most patriots fondly recalled aviator Charles Lindbergh for his leadership of the America First movement that fought to prevent Franklin D. Roosevelt from steering the United States into war against Adolf Hitler’s Germany.

However, in recent times, pernicious Internet agitprop has convinced many patriots that heroes like Lindbergh and his “isolationist” colleagues were actually traitors doing the work of the New World Order.

One broadcaster in particular promotes this nonsense by constantly harping about “the Nazis,” hyping writers who smear Lindbergh and claim Hitler’s heirs are today plotting the “rise of the Fourth Reich.”

Those conned by this garbage fail to see this is really a ploy to keep the image of “the Holocaust” alive, thereby advancing the interests of Israel, which benefits from the Holocaust in multiple ways, without ever mentioning the word “Israel” even once. And that’s propaganda at its most deceptive and calculating.

Even more disturbing is that—as a consequence of this skewed version of history taking a grip on the minds of so many—a remarkable number of today’s patriots have no idea that roughly 90 percent of the American people agreed with Lindbergh: A war against Hitler was a war America should not fight.

The history of that period has been savagely distorted and those who should know don’t have a clue as to what really happened.

Ironically, however, coming out of an elite publishing giant, Random House, is a new book presenting a fascinating look at the efforts by Lindbergh to stop the push to embroil America in that unnecessary war: Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh and America’s Fight Over World War II, 1939-1941.*

The flagrantly pro-British author, Lynne Olson, clearly holds Lindbergh’s traditional American nationalism in contempt, which explains why former secretary of state Madeleine Albright—who famously said the price of 500,000 dead Iraqi children was “worth it”—hails Olson as “our era’s foremost chronicler of World War II politics and diplomacy.”

Still, though soiled by its pro-New World Order slant, this is a book patriots need to read. Many books from establishment sources contain a lot of valuable facts. This is one such volume. Here are just a few of the author’s amazing admissions:

• Solid data proving that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and its Wall Street backers did not support Hitler, but vehemently opposed him.

• British intelligence set up shop at Rockefeller Center in Manhattan and collaborated with the pro-war Fight for Freedom—mostly “upper class East Coast Protestants”—and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, the Jewish espionage agency. All worked closely with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover who was tapping the phones of those who opposed to the drive for war that Lindbergh said was the work of “the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.”

• The amazing story of how many high-ranking military officers “fiercely opposed” FDR’s efforts to arm Britain. Opposing aid to the British was no less than Gen. George C. Marshall whom the author says is now “regarded as the country’s greatest military figure in WWII.”

•While Americans today believe Britain was always seen as a grand ally, the author reveals that, after World War I, “many Americans came to believe that their country had entered the war not because its own national interests demanded such action, but because it had been tricked by the scheming, duplicitous British.”

• FDR utilized warmongering rhetoric of exactly the type today coming from essentially the same sources, including advocacy of the kind of police-state measures such as the Patriot Act and the concept of “homeland security,” which patriots have become convinced was a “Nazi” invention. Substitute’s today’s Muslim-bashing for German-bashing and it is history repeating itself.

Declaring any criticism of his policies as detrimental to national security, FDR spoke of “clever schemes of foreign agents” on American soil. However, the author admits: “The United States never faced any serious threat of internal subversion before or during the war. But the American people never knew that; in fact, they were told the opposite.”

• And, despite Pearl Harbor, most Americans still didn’t see the need for war against Hitler. The author admits, “the odds are high that Congress and the American people would have pressured the president to turn away from an undeclared war against Germany . . . and focus instead on defeating Japan.” Today, most Americans think Pearl Harbor sparked a nationwide cry of “Defeat the Nazi Beast.” It never happened.

——

Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem.
The Book’s Publisher Says

Those Angry Days is the definitive account of the debate over American intervention in World War II—a bitter, sometimes violent clash of personalities and ideas that divided the nation and ultimately determined the fate of the free world.

At the center of this controversy stood the two most famous men in America: President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who championed the interventionist cause, and aviator Charles Lindbergh, who as unofficial leader and spokesman for America’s isolationists emerged as the president’s most formidable adversary. Their contest of wills personified the divisions within the country at large, and author Lynne Olson makes masterly use of their dramatic personal stories to create a poignant and riveting narrative.

While FDR, buffeted by political pressures on all sides, struggled to marshal public support for aid to Winston Churchill’s Britain, Lindbergh saw his heroic reputation besmirched by allegations that he was a Nazi.

Spanning the years 1939 to 1941, Those Angry Days vividly recreates the rancorous internal squabbles that gripped the United States in the period leading up to Pearl Harbor. After Germany vanquished most of Europe, America found itself torn between its traditional isolationism and the need to come to the aid of Britain, the only country still battling Hitler. The conflict over intervention was, as FDR noted, “a dirty fight,” rife with chicanery and intrigue, and Those Angry Days recounts every bruising detail.

 

 

This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

By sparlaxy.de