Les nazis ont fait la vie dure aux Rothschild, confisqué leurs avoirs

Et c’est nul autre le biographe officiel des Rothschild  – Niall Ferguson – qui nous l’apprend.

Plus d’infos:

Du mythe des « nazis pro-Israël » et de ceux qui voient des complots partout…

Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg perçoit le nationalisme comme étant « dangereux »… mais Infowars continue de prétendre que Bilderberg a été fondé par les nazis!

Mise au point sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.

The New Babylon: A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religous and Economic Origins of the New World Order (2009), by Michel Collins Piper

L’empire mondial anglo rêvé par Rhodes: marionette des Rothschild?

Rothschild, notre ennemi traditionnel

The New Babylon: extraits

Les dessous de l’empire Rothschild

La montée du pouvoir financier juif Rothschild

Du mythe des nazis « pantins de la ploutocratie internationale »

Comment Hitler s’est servi de Schacht

Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis »

Gordon Duff décline l’invitation de Carolyn Yeager sous prétexte qu’elle ignore que la « connexion Bush-nazis »

Une contre-vérité tenace: « Prescott Bush, un nazi! »

Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste (donc anti-nazie) des Rothschild

L’empire mondial anglo-américain: une marionnette des Rothschild?

Duff a tort sur l’Holocauste et les prétendus liens Bush-Hitler

Jabotinsky avait planifié l’assassinat d’Hitler et de hauts dirigeants du IIIe Reich

Chamberlain 1939 : « C’est l’Amérique et le monde israélite international qui nous ont précipités dans la guerre. »



« Qui donc a mis comme ça Rothschild sous les verrous ? pour spéculations ? C’est pas Schussnig, c’est pas Cachin, c’est pas Jouhaux, c’est pas Blum, c’est pas Chamberlain, c’est pas Staline, c’est Hitler. 
Quel est le véritable ennemi du capitalisme ? C’est le fascisme. 
Le communisme est un truc de Juif, un moyen d’asservir le peuple plus vachement encore, absolument à l’oeil. 
Quel est le véritable ami du peuple ? Le Fascisme. 
Qui a le plus fait pour l’ouvrier ? L’U.R.S.S. ou Hitler ? C’est Hitler. Y a qu’à regarder sans merde rouge plein les yeux. 
Qui a fait le plus pour le petit commerçant ? C’est pas Thorez, c’est Hitler ! 
Qui nous préserve de la Guerre ? C’est Hitler ! 
Les communistes (juifs ou enjuivés), ne pensent qu’à nous envoyer à la bute, à nous faire crever en Croisades. 
Hitler est un bon éleveur de peuples, il est du côté de la Vie, il est soucieux de la vie des peuples, et même de la nôtre. 
C’est un Aryen. » — Céline, l’école des cadavres , 1938



VIDEO – Red Ice Radio: VKC vs Nazi Conspiracy Theories

VIDEO – (Youtube)- RIC -WKC – The Gleiwitz Incident Hour 1 (RIC website Hour 1) – Hour 2

VIDEO – Realist Report – WKC – Debunking Anti-Nazi Lies

VIDEO – Dawson and WKC – ANC Report – Nazi Myths Busted (full)

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – Hitler Mythbusted

VIDEO – Martinez + WKC – Debunking Anti-NS Myths

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – Hitler-Bashing or Hitler-Understanding

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – Hitler not a Rothschild – Part 1Part 2

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – NS Germany Economics

VIDEO – WKC + Heink – Hyenas of HlGH FlNANCE

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – The Pan-Anglo supremacism

VIDEO – WKC on Brizi-Jewzi World Menace

VIDEO – WKC – The Union Jack (Pub)

VIDEO – WKC – The Union Jack (Reading)

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – The Union Jack

VIDEO – WKC – Pan-Germanist Ideology

VIDEO – VKC – Nazis don’t « rule the world »

VIDEO – WKC on Dr. A. J.Gregor – Fascism and Race

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – Lawrence Dennis + Fascism

VIDEO – Spingola + WKC – Lawrence Dennis

The Nazis Gave Rothschild Bankers The Boot

Despite the frivilous claims of foolhardy patriotards and assorted Jew defenders who often masquerade as “anti-Zionists,” the Nazis were not — in any way — covertly funded by, or in cahoots with, Rothschild bankers. On the contrary, the German, French and Austrian branches of the House of Rothschild were effectively dissolved and extirpated by Hitler. Quite a bizarre and counterproductive action of a “Rothschild agent” wouldn’t you say?

Niall Ferguson’s biography of the Rothschild family, The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World’s Banker: 1849-1999 (Penguin, 2000), although sympathetic to Jewry and the Rothschilds, outlines the reality of the National Socialists’ war against this international criminal Jewish banking cabal. Ferguson writes:

“An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of Nazi propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action. At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University. The largest of these, the Baron Wilhelm Carl von Rothschild Foundation, was “Aryanised” under pressure from the city authorities, so that all references to its founder were expunged. At the same time, the Reich Association of Jews in Germany was forced to sell the Mathilde von Rothschild Paediatric Hospital, the Georgine Sara von Rothschild Foundation for Infirm Foreign Israelites and the Rothschild residence at Grosser Wollgraben 26 to the Frankfurt municipality. The Gestapo also confiscated the A.M. von Rothschild Sanatorium for Lung Diseases in the Black Forest. At least four other Rothschild-founded institutions suffered the same fate.

The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion). But Maximilian — now 95 — was too old to leave. He stayed on in the house in the Bockenheimer Landstrasse, with the garden which his wife’s great-uncle Amschel had acquired over a century before the earliest days of Jewish emancipation in Frankfurt. Or rather he was allowed to occupy a room in the house; for in tragic fulfilment of Amschel’s nightmare — dating back to the night in 1815 when he first slept in the “free air” of the garden — Maximilian was forced to sell the property to the city of Frankfurt for just 610,000 reichsmarks (less tax). In the aftermath of Kristallnacht he was also obliged to sell his art collection to the city for 2.3 million reichsmarks (again less tax) and to donate a further 25 percent of his remaining assets to the Reich as an “atonement payment”…

… Discovered, was no longer the Vienna house by the Alliance. In addition, the Witkowitz board had safeguarded against sequestration the company’s stake in the Swedish Freya ore mines as well as £200,000 in foreign currency. Louis [Nathaniel de Rothschild of Austria] therefore had a real bargaining position. When Himmler sought to ingratiate himself by sending some ornate French furniture to the prison, he was able to send it away complaining that it made his cell look like a “Cracow Bordello.” Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price). But such legal niceties were ultimately bound to be swept aside by Nazi force majeure. Eugene’s hopes of selling the ironworks to the Czechoslovak state for £10 million were dashed when Hitler bullied the Prague government into accepting partition in March 1939. With the works effectively under German control, Goring’s Commissioner Hans Kehrl, Rasche and Paul Pleiger (the Reichswerke’s general director). At the same time Fritz Kranefuss — Himmler’s adjutant and a supervisory board member of the Dresdner bank — informed Rasche on the basis of Sicherheitsdienst intelligence that the transfer abroad of the ownership of Witkowitz had been illegal under currency laws. Finally, in July 1939, it was agreed to sell the plant for £2.9 million. However, the outbreak of war gave the Germans the perfect excuse not to pay. As a result, Witkowitz joined the lengthening list of Rothschild properties confiscated without compensation by the Nazi regime. In January 1941 Goring was able to take the process a step further when 43,300 Witkowitz shares were seized from the vaults of the Paris house (though even this did not give him a technical controlling interest). (It was not until 1953 that the communist government established in Czechoslovakia in 1948 finally paid compensation to the Rothschilds — amounting to £1 millon — for the works.) Yet it was not their industrial investments which Hitler and his lackeys really coveted so much as their investments in art — the Old Masters, the Sevres, the Louis Quinze bureaus — which were the most dazzling fruits of the family’s financial success. In fleeing Austria, Alphonse had left behind one of the great European private collections; and attempts to buy it by Lord Duveen (possibly bidding on behalf of the original owners) were in vain. For the acquisition of so many old masters had given Hitler the idea of establishing a new German gallery at Linz, to give the Reich its Louvre. In 1939 he authorized Hans Posse to begin work on the project, putting the best works seized from Austrian Jews into a “Fuhrer reserve” for this purpose. …

Up until the outbreak of war in 1939, the corollary of the expropriation of the Jews was their emigration from German territory. (It was significant in this respect that the Rothschild palace in the Prinz Eugenstrasse was occupied by Adolf Eichmann’s Central Office for Jewish Emigration, which worked closely with Rafelsberger’s Asset Transactions Office.) Naturally many (though not all) German and Austrian Jews wanted to get out, while the Nazis had no objection to their leaving, provided they could be mulcted in the process. Leading German Jewish bankers — notably Max Warburg — saw little alternative but to facilitate this process. However, for Jews like the Rothschilds who remained outside the area of German control, this created a number of acute dilemmas. …

The only logical solution was therefore to find some alternative territory for the Jews to go to. The Nazis themselves thought of Madagascar. Interestingly, Guy Burgess’s first assignment (when he was still a freelance intelligence agent) from MI6′s D section was — as he faithfully reported to Moscow in December 1938 — “to activate Lord Rothschild” in an attempt to “split the Jewish movement” and “create an opposition to Zionism and Dr Weitzmann [sic].” At around the same time, the Paris house [of the Rothschild family] forwarded to New Court a proposal to purchase 200,000 acres of Brazil’s Mato Grosso “for colonisation purposes”; and another to settle Jews in Sudan’s Upper Nile Valley between Malakhal and Bor — supposedly “a huge territory … with no population and where Jews might organize themselves an important colony.” Kenya, Northern Rhodesia and Guiana were also considered. Only at the eleventh hour, it seems, did the Rothschilds recognize the need to admit refugees into Britain and France. In March 1939 Edouard’s wife Germaine turned an old house at the edge of the Ferrieres estate into a hostel for around 150 refugee children. After the German invasion they were evacuated south and later dispersed, some escaping to the United States.

By 1939, of course, numerous members of the Rothschild family were themselves refugees. The German invasion of France in May 1940 increased their number substantially. Even before the fall of Paris, Robert had already reached the safety of Montreal, taking with him his wife Nelly and daughters Diane and Cecile. It was not until July, however, that his cousin and senior partner Edouard — now in his seventies — opted to leave France, finally reaching the United States after a circuitous journey through Spain and Portugal. (He too was accompanied by his wife Germaine and daughter Bethsabee, his eldest daughter Jacqueline having already settled in America with her second husband.) Their former partner Maurice also ended up in Canada, while his ex-wife Noemie and son Edmond took refuge at the estate at Pregny. The other French Rothschild of that generation, Henri, was already resident in Portugal. Finally, Alain’s pregnant wife reached the US via Spain and Brazil, while Guy’s wife Alix took the route through Argentina, though she later rejoined her husband.

Occupied France to confiscate “possessions of the Palais Rothschild,” including any which had been handed over to the French state. The following month, the Germans ordered that administrators be put in charge of the Jewish firms. The Luftwaffe and later a German general occupied the Rothschild house at 23 avenue de Marigny.

Yet the Germans soon found themselves in competition with the puppet Vichy regime they themselves had called into being. Even before Keitel’s order, the Petain regime issued a decree which declared that all Frenchman who had left mainland France after May 10 had “removed themselves from the responsibilities and duties of members of the national community.” Accordingly, their assets were to be confiscated and sold, the proceeds going to the Vichy state. This was explicitly applied to Edouard, Robert and Henri. Soon after this, Petain laid claim to the Rothschild offices in the rue Laffitte for a government welfare agency and showed every sign of intending to treat other buildings belonging to the family in a similar fashion, putting them all in the hands of a new Public Property Office.

In some ways, it made little difference to the Rothschilds whether it was the Germans or the Vichy regime which stole their property. The latter was motivated by anti-Semitism too, as evidenced by the decrees Petain issued on October 3, 1940 and June 2, 1941, which drastically restricted the rights of French Jews, and the constant vitriolic attacks on the Rothschilds in pro-German papers like Partis-Soir and Au Pilori. Nor can it be seriously argued that Vichy officials were somehow more lenient in their treatment of Rothschild property than the Germans would have been. Maurice Janicot, who ran Petain’s Public Property Office, is said to have prevented the Germans from clearing the cellars of Lafite, for example; but a lack of buyers seems the most likely explanation for his failure to sell Elie’s Neuilly stable of horses, Alain’s house on the rue du Cirque and Miriam’s houses in Boulogne and Paris. As can be seen from his statement to German authorities in May 1941 — to the effect that de Rothschild Freres now belonged to the Vichy state — the aim was to pre-empt the Germans, not to protect the Rothschilds. The attempt by Petain’s Commissariat for the Jewish Questions to convert the Institut de biologie physico-chimique founded by Edmond in 1927 into a laboratory for the eugenicist Alex Carrel says much about the fundamental compatibility of Vichy and the Third Reich.

… If Hitler had successfully launched “Operation Sealion” in the summer of 1940, when Britain was at her most vulerable, a similar fate might have befallen the English Rothschilds and their remaining private collections — a worse fate probably, as the invasion of Britain would have made the ultimate defeat of Germany infinitately harder to achieve.

The fact that the Nazis seized and dismantled Rothschild assets and interests in Germany, France and Austria (which became part of the Third Reich after 1938′s Anschluss), as well as arrested Austrian-Jewish banking kingpin Louis von Rothschild, is not in question, despite what suspicious internet characters try to propagate. The oft-repeated claim that Hitler “didn’t go after the Rothschilds” or “left the Rothschilds alone” is, as you have just witnessed, a barefaced falsehood perpetrated by, what can only amount to, Jewish disinformation agents.

A brief biography of Louis von Rothschild (1882-1955), states:

“The collapse of the Creditanstalt in 1931 had an impact across Europe and caused death of a bank. Only action of the Paris and London Rothschild banks could collapse the Vienna Rothschild bank is prevented. A foreign creditor Cttee led by Lionel Rothschild / London and Lord Kindersley, the bank finally restored. But only a few years later came the final blow: 1938 Louis was arrested by the Nazis and held for a year in jail until the complicated negotiations over his release were completed. Rothschild was allowed to leave the country only if he renounced all Austrian possessions. A truly princely ransom. The war effort Vítkovice plant, which provided 30% of crude steel, 30% coal and 40% of the pig iron was in Austria, but was previously transferred to an English company, so that the Nazis could not confiscate the works simply. It was not until after the outbreak of the war Goering took over the works. (After the war, the Czech Communists confiscated the work and paid the Rothschilds in 1953, a compensation) The vast art collections (several 1000 objects) of the Rothschilds were also seized. This ended the presence of the Rothschilds on Austrian soil. The childless Louis went into exile in the United States.

The modern-day Rothschilds themselves are still kvetching about it on their website:

“The crash of 1929 brought problems, not least in Austria where Louis von Rothschild struggled hard to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria’s largest bank, to prevent collapse. Less than a decade later a darker tide arrived; the Austrian Rothschilds’ interests were seized in 1938 by the Nazis, bringing to an end more than a century at the heart of middle European banking. In France and Austria, the family was scattered for the duration of the war.

Several New York Times articles also refer to this event:

“… The [Austrian Rothschild] family’s holdings were seized by the Nazis during the German Anschluss in 1938. [. . .] Their holdings had been vastly reduced, in part because of wartime destruction by the Nazis….” (“At $90 Million, Rothschild Sale Exceeds Goals.” New York Times. July 09, 1999.)

“A year after the Austrian Government agreed to return about $40 million worth of art and objects that the Nazis confiscated from the Austrian branch of the Rothschild family, members of the 256-year-old banking dynasty have decided to sell the collection.” (“Austrian Rothschilds Decide to Sell; Sotheby’s in London Will Auction $40 Million in Art Seized by Nazis.” New York Times. April 10, 1999.)

The only people in the world who foolishly allege that this didn’t happen are the lying anti-Hitler fetishists of the David Icke persuasion who dismiss and try to cast doubt upon anything and everything that doesn’t coincide with their kosher-approved “theories.” These buffoons are harboring a subversive pro-Jewish agenda. They aim at casting aspersions upon anyone who resists Jewry in word and deed, as Hitler and the National Socialists did so efficiently and courageously.

In 1940, Reich Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels commissioned the production of a film exposing the criminal historical machinations of the Rothschild family entitled, The Rothschilds: Shares in Waterloo. It was the first of three counter-semitic movies made in 1940 by the Nazi regime. The film provided a historical account of the Rothschild family’s rise to fortune, set mostly in Britain during the Napoleonic wars. An indictment of Jewish intrigue and avarice, the film aimed at illustrating the “Judafication” of British society at the hands of the Rothschilds, demonstrating that the Britons had become “the Jews among Aryans.” (…)


Hitler a arrêté et détenu des banquiers et des agents de banquiers juifs en Allemagne, comme les Rothschild. Quand les Allemands sont arrivés en Autriche en 1938, l’un de leurs premiers actes fut de saisir les intérêts Rothschild en Autriche, brisant ainsi le contrôle Rothschild de toute l’Europe continentale. En France, les Allemands ont recherché Guy de Rothschild, mais il a fui à New York, où sa femme a eu un fils, David René James de Rothschild, qui contrôle la dynastie Rothschild aujourd’hui. Guy de Rothschild lui-même est allé à la « City » de Londres pour aider à gérer la guerre mondiale des banquiers contre Hitler. Leur stratégie était de contribuer à armer et soutenir l’URSS de sorte que les Russes et les Allemands s’entre-détruisent, permettant aux banquiers de reprendre le contrôle de l’Europe. Concernant Louis Baron de Rothschild, James Pool écrit dans Hitler And His Secret Partners: Contributions, Loot and Rewards, p.114-115:

« William Shirer, then a correspondent in Vienna, watched SS men « carting off silver, tapestries, paintings, and other loot from the Rothschild palace. » Baron Louis de Rothschild, who was Jewish, was arrested by the Gestapo and only able to buy his freedom after turning his Austrian steel mills over to the Hermann Goering Works, a giant government-run steel company controlled by Goering. Hundreds of Germans flocked… to Vienna to buy up Jewish businesses at bargain prices. Hitler’s bloodless conquest of Austria was his greatest triumph yet. His popularity and his prestige with the generals was greatly increased. Most important… Austria would enable the German economy to keep going for another year. Although Austria was a small country its gold reserve of 38$ million was larger than the meagre gold reserve Germany had left. When Dr. Schacht, the president of the Reichsbank, arrived in Vienna to take over the Austrian National Bank, he claimed the entire gold reserve for Germany, along with Austria’s foreign exchange  reserves, which amounted to almost 300$ million. « 



Creditanstalt had to declare bankruptcy on May 11, 1931. This event resulted in a global financial crisis and ultimately the bank failures of the Great Depression.[2]:2–3 [3][4] Too big to fail, Chancellor Otto Ender had the CA ultimately rescued, distributing the enormous share of costs between the Republic, the National Bank of Austria and the Rothschild family. Plans of a nationalisation schemed by the Social Democrats were rejected. However, the institute was de facto state-owned after Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuß in 1934 oredered the merger of the institute with the Wiener Bankverein, thus changing its name to Creditanstalt-Bankverein.

Following the Austrian Anschluss to Nazi Germany in 1938, Creditanstalt-Bankverein was targeted for both financial and racial reasons. Louis Nathaniel Rothschild was immediately arrested and in early March Nazis threw the bank’s Jewish president, Franz Rothenberg, from a moving vehicle (an incident he survived). The Nazi authorities demanded compensation from imprisoned Rothschild for the losses suffered by the Austrian state when the bank collapsed. Aggrieved and disseized, he emigrated to the US in 1939 after more than one year in custody.

Creditanstalt-Bankverein was later taken over by Deutsche Bank,[5] patronised by Hermann Josef Abs. Though CEO Josef Joham made contact with the US Office of Strategic Services, Creditanstalt also settled the financial issues of several Nazi concentration camps as well as the « Aryanization » of Jewish-owned businesses, like the re-establishment of Sascha-Film as Wien-Film Limited.



The Jewish War of Survival – PDF

by Arnold Leese

(founder of the Imperial Fascist League)

CHAPTER I « We Are Fighting In Defense of Freedom » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER II  » We Are Meeting a Challenge to Our Own Security » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER III « We are defending the rights of all Nations to live their own lives » and « fighting against the substitution of brute force for Law as the arbiter between Nations. » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER IV « We Are Fighting Against the Violation of the Sanctity of Treaties and Disregard of the Pledged Word » (Lord Halifax)
CHAPTER V « We Are Fighting Today for the Preservation of Christian Principles » (The (London) Times, 17th Feb. 1940)
CHAPTER VI « We Are Fighting As Our Fathers Fought to Uphold the Doctrine That All Men Are Equal In the Sight of God » (Franklin D. Roosevelt, 6th Jan. 1942)
CHAPTER VII « We Are Fighting for Democracy« 
CHAPTER VIII The Theory That High Finance Caused the War
CHAPTER IX The Object Is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism
CHAPTER X Unprepared and Blindfolded
CHAPTER XI Hitler Always Knew His Real Enemy
CHAPTER XII Hitler Wanted Peace With Britain
CHAPTER XIII How Britain Was Egged On to Make War
CHAPTER XIV The Jews Acknowledge Their Power and Threaten
CHAPTER XV The Jews Declare War
CHAPTER XVI The Jewish War
CHAPTER XVII The Peace: Britain Defeated Whoever Wins
Chapter VIII
There is a school of thought which believes that International Finance with its preponderant Jewish interest and the Monetary System under which most of the world has suffered from mass unemployment was doomed to be superseded by Hitler’s credit system based upon a goods standard and international barter. This would displace gold, the tool of the Internationalists. I believe this myself.
But some go so far as to say that the war was brought about so that, if Hitler could be defeated, the Gold Standard Monetary System, which is fraudulent, could be maintained to the benefit of Wall Street and other large Gold Controllers.
I do not believe that.
It might be worth a war from the point of view of Wall Street, but it would not be worth this war. This war shows every trace of our having been dragged into it blindfolded and unprepared. Wall Street would not have allowed that. Wall Street knows that if the Germans won the war, there would be no more Wall Street.
In my opinion there was more to it than the survival of the fraudulent Gold Standard System. The necessities of racial survival made it urgent for the Jews to act without delay. Their considerable influence in Wall Street together with other participants in the spoils of the fraudulent system made it not too difficult to get the « Street » to support a war which was represented as inevitable.

This is not the place to go into the intricacies of monetary systems. The kernel of the problem is that credit based upon gold is insufficient for the needs of modern commerce. A short supply of money and credit is best for the usurer or money-lender, since scarcity raises the rate of interest borrowers must pay. Power to regulate the amount of money and credit available enables the controllers of Gold to dominate world affairs, economically and politically. The creation of inextinguishable national debts is part of the system of control and with control goes domination. This system of economic and financial bondage was doomed by the expansion of the barter system developed by National Socialist Germany. (For a more detailed explanation see the chapter, The Peace We Lost in A PEOPLE’S RUNNYMEDE, by Robert Scrutton, Andrew Dakers, publisher.)

Chapter IX

The Object is to Destroy Fascism and Hitlerism

At last we approach facts.

Certainly we went to war with the object of destroying Fascism and Hitlerism. But the people were not allowed to know this till it was too late to withdraw, or they would not have sanctioned it, had they had an opportunity to do so. It was not Hitler or a Fascist form of Government that was objected to but that both opposed the Jewish influence in their domestic affairs.

President Roosevelt, in a letter to the International Labour Office Conference in 1944, said:

« The welfare of the world’s population and their liberty are the first and ultimate concern of those dedicated to root out from this earth every trace of Nazi ideas and Nazi methods. »
The London Times‘ leading article of 26th September 1939, said:
« We have gone to war with the single-minded determination to rid Europe of a particular menace whose presence is incompatible with the continuance of civilized life, and it is the simplicity of this claim that resolves what the Duce feels to be inconsistency in our discrimination between Hitler and his Russian accomplice. We believe that the Russian action, lawless and treacherous as we must declare it to be, is a secondary and subordinate consequence of the original crime. The Soviet has not been a party to Hitler’s previous outrages and has not shown itself to be in essence an aggressive power. »
The Duce was not the only man to see inconsistency in the discrimination in favour of the Soviets, despite this dead-lame explanation.
On plenty of other occasions, politicians have assured us that we are fighting to destroy Fascism. But they do not tell us why they deem it so necessary. There was a time when it did not appear to be a necessity to Winston Churchill. In his Great Contemporaries he wrote:
« Those who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile. »
Again in STEP BY STEP, Churchill wrote of Herr Hitler:
« If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. »
But of Russia, Churchill said in 1920:
« The Soviet system is barbarism worse than the Stone Age. »
In a broadcast on 20th January 1940 he said:
« Everyone can see how Communism rots the soul of a nation . . . »
And later in the year on 1st April, he said:
« Communism is a deadly mental and moral disease. »
From this it is not understandable why Churchill should be leading the British Empire in a war to destroy National Socialism with the aid of Bolshevik Russia.
Of Italian Fascism, Churchill said in a speech on 11th November 1938:
« Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces and rallying the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilized society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism. »
As far back as 1926 the Financial News reported that a Committee of British Residents in Florence announced:
« We wish to state most clearly and emphatically that there exists here today nothing that can be justly termed either tyranny or suppression of personal freedom as guaranteed by constitutional law in any civilized land. We believe that Mussolini enjoys the enthusiastic support and admiration of the Italian people who are contented, orderly and prosperous to a degree hitherto unknown in Italy, and probably without parallel at the present time among other great European nations still suffering from the war. »
Sympathetic readers will smile when they are reminded that in 1933 the Financial Times brought out a special eight-page Supplement under the caption:

The Renaissance of Italy Fascism’s Gift of Order and Progress
The solution of the mystery is that in those days Fascism had not yet grappled with Jewish influences dominating the nation’s affairs. Giuseppe Toeplitz, Polish born Jew, had just retired from the management of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, which a New York Times dispatch from Milan on January 29, 1938 (the date of Signor Toeplitz’s death) estimated controlled one-seventh of all Italian industries.
We Fascists have noticed with amusement how our own Government is forced by the pressure of necessity to adopt many of the policies of Fascism. We may instance the recognition of Agriculture as basic among the industries; the necessity of ensuring that the Land is not misused by those farming it and the corporative organization of certain industries and professions.
The International Labour Office issued a report in April 1944 in which the activities of the German Labour Front established by Hitler were recommended to be « adapted for future use » after our victory. Facilities for workmen’s travel, recreation and other sparetime activities, for vocational training and research on labour protection; the « Beauty of Work » service — « Kraft durch Freude » (Strength through Joy) in the National Socialist Labor Program — and the Labour Bank, « one of the chief credit institutions . . . of the whole of Europe »; « it should also be the responsibility of the Labour Commissioners, » the Report of I.L.O. further outlines, « to continue all administrative services required for the administration of labor and social legislation — employment services, social insurance and the labour inspectorate. » The I. L. O. Philadelphia Labor Charter actually purloins direct from Fascism its notions of industrial organizations! « It insists, » says the London Times of 13th May 1944, « on the employers’ right to combine freely, and declares also that if workers and employers combine to run industry collectively, there must be a third element — the Government — to cooperate and see that the rest of the community is not exploited. » Similar proposals are found in the 1944 Report on Reconstruction issued by the Grand Council of the Trade Union Congress.
It was on these principles that the Fascist Corporative Organization of Industry was based! Then why should we be so keen to destroy all this? There can be but one plausible answer. National Socialism and Fascism opposed the Jewish influence in the domestic affairs of their respective countries. That we have ample proof that National Socialism and Fascism were good governments for the Germans and the Italians of their respective countries, apparently, is of no consideration. Is it that only Jewish interests matter the world over?
We may venture to doubt whether better Government for « liberated » Italy than the Fascist one can be achieved with the material at hand. Just consider this London Times report of the 25th April 1944:
« As most members of the new Cabinet are Republicans, a form of procedure was devised whereby Ministers, before taking oath, signed a declaration stating that they had accepted office with the purpose of serving the best interests of the country, but without attaching any permanent significance to the ceremony. »
It was from such « accommodating scoundrels » as this that Fascism saved Italy for twenty years. At the time of this writing, every so-called « liberated » country begins a campaign of violence and outrage against its most active anti-communist elements. The same conditions are at once reproduced from which their Fascist or semi-Fascist Governments of the past had saved them.




More Than Meets the Eye?

• Why Bilderberg isn’t Nazi and Ron Paul isn’t going third party

Michael Collins Piper

American Free Press

Three current news stories—taken together—illustrate that things are not always as they seem. Take, for example, a new revelation about the Bilderberg group released by Internet voice Alex Jones in the wake of last week’s Bilderberg meeting in Virginia, where Jones joined a crowd jeering the assembled would-be world rulers.

Although Jones has insisted Bilderberg is some sort of remnant of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler devoted to a modern-day Nazi agenda, a report on Jones’s own website effectively admits Bilderberg’s program is distinctly anti-Nazi.

Citing the papers of former Sen. Fred Harris (D-Okla.), who attended Bilderberg’s 1966 meeting in Wiesbaden, Germany, Jones points out that Harris recorded the remarks of top Bilderberg figure, labor leader Walter Reuther, who outlined Bilderberg’s underlying agenda: “Nationalism is dangerous.”

WWII-era German National Socialism—Nazism —of course, was very much nationalist in every sense, and the fact nationalism was denounced at Bilderberg gives a clear picture of the real Bilderberg point of view, rumors notwithstanding.

Jones mentions Bilderberg’s founder, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, had been a Nazi Party member. But what Jones does not mention is that Bernhard left the party in 1934, a year after Hitler came to power, and by 1940 was a top leader of the anti-Nazi resistance in Europe. So by the time Bernhard became Bilderberg chief, he had undergone a serious political transformation.

What’s more, as careful historians know, Hitler held Bernhard in contempt. In his recorded Table Talk* and in the memoirs of his valet, Hitler is recalled scoffing satirically at Bernhard, and questioning his intelligence, integrity and loyalty.

The forces leading Bilderberg are anti-Nazi, particularly the Rothschild dynasty, whose assets were seized by the Nazis, belying a popular myth that “the Nazis never touched the Rothschilds.”



*Hitler’s Table Talk is available fromTBR BOOK CLUB for $35 plus $5 Shipping and Handling. Softcover, 8.5 x by 11, 320 pages, #621. Call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge or send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Outside U.S. please email sales@barnesreview.org for foreign S&H.


Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats, Target: Traficant and The Golem. You can order any of these books by calling 1-888-699-6397.



Lors d’une réunion rapportée dans le « The Jewish Chronicle » du 14 décembre 1934,  Samuel Untermeyer fait approuver la résolution suivante :

« Le boycott de l’Allemagne par les  Juifs devra continuer jusqu’à ce que le gouvernement allemand ait rendu aux Loges leur statut et  leurs propriétés dont elles ont été dépouillées »

Hitler Gave Freemasonic Jews The Boot

There is some disinfo you’ll see floating around the internet where unresearched clowns repeat the claim that the secret Jewish-Masonic society B’nai B’rith was allowed to exist and operate “untouched” during National Socialist rule in Germany. This is baloney.

In 1937, Time Magazine reported that the Nazis raided Berlin’s B’nai B’rith lodge, arrested its members, and promptly shut down this subversive group.

Time Magazine — May 03, 1937

Adolf Hitler: ‘We Shall Crush The Freemasons!’


United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

A large searchable web site with a great deal of information regarding the Holocaust. It holds a significant amount of material relating the persecution of Freemasons during World War II.

 The Holocaust History Project

The Holocaust History Project

A document based site which is searchable and which produced several references to Freemasonry.

The Avalon Project

The Avalon Project at Yale Law School

A major source of documents over four centuries. Includes transcipts of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials with lots of references to Freemasonry. Also contains all the Human Rights legislation since 1856. Searchable but a wee bitty idiosyncratic.



(…)After World War I, in Weimar Germany right-wing German nationalists and antisemites claimed that Jews and Freemasons had conspired to provoke and prolong the war in order to bleed and destroy the aristocratic Empires of Germany, Russia, and Austria and to install Jewish domination by establishing constitutional democracy or Bolshevism. Antisemites continued to spread the idea that Jews would achieve world domination through Freemasonry. Pan-Germans and racists such as Alfred Rosenberg, one of Hitler’s followers in the Nazi party, Erich Ludendorff, the Chief of the German Army’s General Staff during World War I, and Ludendorff’s wife, Mathilda, played prominent roles in disseminating anti-Masonic propaganda. In 1922, Rosenberg published Das Verbrechen der Freimaurerei: Judentum, Jesuitismus, Deutsches Christentum (The Crime of Freemasonry: Jewry, Jesuitism, and German Christianity). Five years later, Ludendorff published Vernichtung der Freimaurerei durch Enthüllung ihrer Geheimnisse (Exterminating Freemasonry by Revealing its Secrets), in which he alleged that Freemason initiation and rituals trained the Christian members to be “artificial” Jews and condemned Masonic support of Jewish emancipation for bringing “alien” influences into German culture. In his political testament, Mein Kampf (1925), Nazi party leader Adolf Hitler repeated the charge that the Jews used Freemasonry to achieve their political ends: “To strengthen his [i.e., the Jew’s] political position, he tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance — and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening.”


As Nazi Germany prepared for war in 1937-1938, the regime relaxed pressure on the rank and file of the dissolved lodges. Hitler amnestied members of the rank and file who renounced their former loyalties in April 1938 and efforts were made in the public sector to decide on continued employment of former lodge members on a case to case basis. Many civil servants who had been forced to retire due to their Masonic connections were recalled into service after the war began and the ban on former Masons serving in the Wehrmacht (German armed forces), even at the officer rank, was relaxed. The Nazi party continued to ban former Masons from membership, though exceptions were made after 1938 in both the Nazi party and even the SS. As they conquered Europe, the Germans forcibly dissolved Masonic organizations and confiscated their assets and documents wherever they established an occupation regime. After a lodge was closed, it was ransacked for membership lists, important library and archival items, furnishings, and other cultural artifacts. Items seized would be sent on to the appropriate German agency, primarily the SD and later, the RSHA. As part of their propaganda campaign against Freemasonry, the Nazis and other local right-wing organizations mounted anti-Masonic exhibitions throughout occupied Europe. German-occupied Paris hosted an anti-Masonic exhibition in October 1940, as did German-occupied Brussels in February 1941. Displaying Masonic ritual and cultural artifacts stolen from lodges, such exhibitions aimed to ridicule and direct hatred towards Freemasons and to heighten fears of a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy.

German wartime propaganda, particularly in the army, charged that the Jews and Masons had provoked World War II and were responsible for the policies of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, who was identified as a Freemason. Some of Germany’s Axis partners decreed police and discriminatory measures against Masons. In August 1940, the Vichy France regime issued a decree declaring Masons to be enemies of the state and authorizing police surveillance of them. The French wartime authorities even created a card file that identified all members of the Grand Orient of France, a leading French Masonic organization; the card file survived the war and was later microfilmed for the holdings of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives. In 1942, Alfred Rosenberg was authorized by a Hitler decree to wage an “intellectual war” against the Jews and Freemasons. To that end, Hitler permitted Rosenberg’s “Deployment Staff of Reich Leader Rosenberg (Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg; ERR) to seize and evaluate Masonic archives and libraries to best equip them to carry on the “methodical intellectual fight” that was “necessary to win the war.” The members of ERR were guaranteed the support of the High Command of the German Armed Forces (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht; OKW) in fulfilling their mission. After the end of World War II, vast collections of Masonic archives and library collections that had been seized by German authorities were captured, in turn, by Allied and Soviet forces. For example, a significant Masonic archive was found in Silesia, in eastern Germany, by Soviet troops in the last days of World War II. The Soviet authorities shipped the records to Moscow, where they were held in secret archives. Other Masonic-related materials were recovered in Poland; some of this material has been microfilmed and stored in the archive of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Since the end of the Cold War, many Masonic-related collections have been returned to their countries of origin, while others continue to be held in foreign repositories. Because many of the Freemasons who were arrested were also Jews and/or members of the political opposition, it is not known how many individuals were placed in Nazi concentration camps and/or were targeted only because they were Freemasons. Some former lodge members, as individuals, participated in or were associated with German resistance circles; and some were arrested and murdered during World War II.


This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.