- Les rebelles ou Assad? Même les USA ne peuvent conclure avec certitude qui est responsable des attaques et hésitent à intervenir…
- Les attaques ne profitent qu’aux rebelles et à ceux qui, comme Israël, réclament à grands cris une guerre contre la Syrie…
- L’ancien chef de cabinet de Colin Powell sous l’administration Bush, le colonel à la retraite Lawrence Wilkerson avait sonné l’alarme en mai dernier qu’Israël pourrait utiliser des armes chimiques en Syrie pour provoquer la guerre qu’ils souhaitent et pousser les nations occidentales à aller combattre à sa place…
- La tête d’Assad mise à prix, des assassins professionnels sur le terrain…
- Le gouvernement d’Assad est laïque (impossible donc de les faire passer pour de vilains islamistes), proche de la Russie et de l’Iran: autant de raisons pour Israël de rayer la Syrie de la carte.
- Les lobby juifs fauteurs de guerre pour Israël ont tellement peur d’être reconnus pour ce qu’ils sont qu’ils font en sorte que les médias camouflent leur travail de fauteurs de guerres pour Israël… Comme ils ont travaillé à camoufler dans les médias leurs efforts de fauteurs de guerre contre l’Iran.
- La Syrie s’est procuré un arsenal chimique précisément parce qu’elle savait qu’Israël a l’arsenal nucléaire! Personne ne mentionne que la Syrie a souvent appelé à la création du « Moyen-Orient sans arme nucléaire », justement parce que cela mettrait de la pression sur Israël.

AUDIO – American Free Press Editors Roundtable Aug. 28, 2013 AMERICAN FREE PRESS newspapers editors and reporters discuss the weeks top stories. Michael Collins Piper discusses his latest article on Syria being framed.
AUDIO – AMERICAN FREE PRESS Editors Roundtable, Sep. 12, 2013 AMERICAN FREE PRESS newspapers editors and reporters discuss the weeks top stories. Michael Collins Piper discusses his latest article on Syria being framed.
• ‘No smoking gun’ evidence that Syria used chemical weapons
• Israel the source for current charges of sarin gas use by Assad
By Michael Collins Piper
Issue 36, September 9, 2013
One of America’s most respected military figures charged publicly that long-standing allegations about the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons may have been, in his words, “an Israeli false flag operation” calculated to stir up opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, long perceived by Israel as a threat to its geopolitical agenda.
And now that the United States seems poised to attack Syria on the basis of new claims about the use of such weapons, what former Army Col. Lawrence Wilkerson told Current TV on May 3 bears noting.
A longtime military intimate of Gen. Colin Powell, and later his chief of staff when Powell was secretary of state under “W” Bush, Wilkerson said his intelligence sources dismissed claims at that time that Assad’s military had used chemical weapons against terrorist forces.
Having loomed over Assad for months, that charge has been reinvigorated and the media revels in the possibility the U.S. will now attack Syria.
However, The Los Angeles Times reported Aug. 27 that Germany’s Focus magazine—citing a former Israeli intelligence official—said Israel was the primary source for current charges about Syria’s alleged use of chemical warfare.
Noting “U.S. intelligence sources long have relied on Israel to help provide intelligence about Syria” the Times didn’t mention it was also Israel that previously supplied the Bush administration much of the false data about supposed weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which provided the pretext for the invasion of that Arab republic.
The media carefully suppresses the fact that—as demanded by the Israeli lobby in Washington—U.S. tax dollars (underwriting Israeli covert expertise) instigated the rebellion against Assad that led to the civil war that U.S. blood and treasure are now expected to resolve in a manner satisfactory to Israel.
Although the media suggests the Pentagon is eager for war on Syria, the fact is that—just as before the Iraq war when multiple military leaders werewarning of the dangers of such a venture—top brass are likewise urging restraint vis-à-vis Syria.
Even Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey recently told Congress that U.S. intervention in Syria would not be in America’s interests.
Yet, despite widespread public opposition to war, many Republicans and Democrats alike—bankrolled by pro-Israel campaign contributors—are clamoring for action.
Syria opposition leader praises Benjamin Netanyahu ÇA C’EST UN NOUVEAU CLASSIQUE!
Israel Support to Al Qaeda Rebels: New Free Syrian Army (FSA) Commander Trained in Israel
McCain, Graham call for military action on Syria after chemical-weapons evidence
John McCain wants Syria intervention
McCain says it’s ‘crazy’ not to seek regime change in Syria
McCain: ‘Catastrophic’ if Congress overrules Obama on Syria
McCain says Israel ‘shaken’ by US dallying
CONFIRMED McCain Posed with Known Terrorists in Syria
McCain calls for strict timeline for Syria chemical weapons handover
McCain: Add monitors to Syria military intervention resolution
John McCain: John Kerry ‘unbelievably unhelpful’
OFFICIAL ARIZONA GOP BODY PASSES FORMAL REBUKE OF JOHN MCCAIN
US Senators McCain, Graham: Cannot imagine worse signal to send to Iran
Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham slam agreement preventing WWIII
John McCain To Attack Vladimir Putin In the Pages of Pravda!
‘Expert’ US analyst on Syria cited by McCain and Kerry fired for being a complete fraud
WSJ PRO WAR op-ed writer Elizabeth O’Bagy fired for resume lie
How to Start a War
In an interviewwith online news outlet Real News Network, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, said Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (RS. C.) “are bordering on being traitors in my view, because they won’t let this president [Obama] have room to achieve a diplomatic solution [with Iran].” He added: “They’re all angry nowthat [Obama] didn’t bomb Syria . . . and so they’removing on to Iran, with Graham even saying he’s going to move for legislation to authorize the use of military force against Iran in the next four to five months.” (American Free Press, Oct 7, 2013)
Sen. John McCain: I’m « very sad » over U.N. resolution on Syrian weapons
Syria researcher dismissed for falsifying credentials hired by Senator McCain
McCain Hires Disgraced Syria ‘Expert’ Elizabeth O’Bagy
Bibi Netanyahou et John « Bomb-bomb-Iran » McCain
Mars 2014:
John McCain Thanks AIPAC for Supporting Military Intervention in Syria
Assad aide: Israel sent undercover troops to Syria
Septembre 2013:
Lobbying affiché des groupes juifs pour une guerre en Syrie: les juifs ont peur que ça leur retombe sur le nez.
AIPAC: Stop Lobbying for a US-Syria Attack!
Le discours de l’Aipac sur la Syrie n’aide pas Israel
Apparemment: ils ont même décidé de tout arrêter… en apparence en tout cas:
With deal struck, pro-Israel groups suspend lobbying for Syria strikePro-Israel groups embrace a U.S.-Russia deal on Syria after a launching a full-throttled lobbying push for a military strike.
Août 2013:
JTA – Initial reluctance gone, AIPAC makes big push on Syria response
JPOST- Pro-Israel groups in United States scramble to save Syria strike resolution
1 000 rabbins posent la question à Obama: peut-on compter sur vous pour agir en Syrie?
White House to Congress: ‘Help protect Israel with attack on Syria’
The “Secret Jew”: Warmonger John Kerry’s “Hidden” Jewishness
Was Kerry’s ‘Munich moment’ on Syria created by a protégé of the Israel lobby?
Senior GOP Senators: We Won’t Support Military Strikes Without ‘Overall Strategy’ To Remove Assad
Israel Ynetnews: Obama blinked first Analysis: Decision to delay strike against Syria sends dangerous message to cruel regimes, terrorists everywhere
Jewish Press Unleash Hatred against Britain The Jewish Times of Israel editor, veteran Zionist Supremacist and agent David Horovitz, has shown the…
Britain’s ‘isolationism’ is not good for Israel
1 septembre 2013
Gens détestant le nègre sont nombreux depuis qu’il envahit la France, conformément au souhait des sages de Sion, avec soutien outrancier de Veuve irrégulière. Presse juive est la plus forte dans ce domaine, à commencer par Libération qui publia hier en couverture cette photo du singe métamorphosé en homme Obama, car il ne voulait pas exploser Syrie.
Voyez le truc, Obama était chic type quand il fut élu grâce au soutien de Tikkun. Il devient laid et bestial maintenant qu’il hésite à déclencher guerre absurde dans l’intérêt de Yisraêl. (lire le reste…)
Obama’s critics in Israel should ask themselves: Why hasn’t Netanyahu acted yet on Syria? Israeli leaders on the right denounce the world for not stopping Assad; let’s stop suggesting that others step into the line of fire…
Selling War: White House Says Attack Will ‘Protect Israel’
VIDEO – FLASHBACK: Roland Dumas: » La guerre en Syrie, c’est pour Israël «
FLASHBACK: Roland Dumas: « Israël contrôle la France, elle se trompe à l’égard d’Assad »
VIDEO – Mark Glenn on Press TV: « Israel is the one pushing for war with Syria »
Polls: Israelis want US, Europe to attack Syria, but against IDF intervention
Obama under Zionist pressure to retaliate against Syria
Fanatic Zionists Seek to Spark New Middle East War
Netanyahu: Syria chemical weapons must stop; French FM: Strong reaction needed
Netanyahu: On Syria, Israel’s finger on pulse and trigger
Syria, Iran issue first explicit warning to Israel if US attacks
Syrian rebel leader asks Israel, US for help
Israel deploys missile system near border with Syria
Israel to U.S.: Respond to Syria Prominent Israeli Cabinet ministers are calling for a U.S.-led response to a what appears to have been a chemical attack in Syria last week that the prime minister describes as a “terrible crime.” Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday that “this situation cannot continue.”
Israel expects U.S. strike on Syria after alleged chemical weapons use
Israelis question U.S. commitment in Syria
Netanyahu: ‘Low probability’ Israel will be drawn into Syria fighting
Le rôle d’Israël dans l’annonce de l’attaque contre la Syrie
Le président israélien « certain » que les Etats-Unis vont frapper la Syrie
Israel estimates: High likelihood of US attack in Syria
The Next Big Lie and the Next War: This Time Syria!
PNAC members all too similar to the 66 « experts » pressuring Obama into Syria
Jewish Press Confirms that Zionist Supremacists are Behind War Propaganda
Top Israeli Intelligence Chief Confirms Israeli Interest in Toppling Syrian Government
Lies upon Lies: US “Evidence” for “Chemical Attack” based upon “Israeli Intercept”
Mossad Spying Activities Casts New Doubts over Israeli “Evidence”
LOL!!!–Israeli intelligence ‘backs reports’ of latest chemical weapons attack in Syria
WALL STREET JOURNAL [owned by Rupert Murdoch] – U.S., Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts « One crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit that oversees Mr. Assad’s chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said. »
Israeli intelligence seen as ‘central’ to US case against Syria
Israeli Minister Says Syria Used Chemical Weapons
VIDEO – Thierry Meyssan: Israël est derrière l’opération de propagande belliciste contre la Syrie (Pourquoi, ailleurs Meyssan insistait que les USA, l’Angleterre et Israël sont une seule et même entité…)
WELL KNOWN JEWISH WRITERS WHO SAY USA FIGHTS WARS FOR ISRAEL
Video – Accusations d’usage d’armes chimiques La Syrie dénonce l’influence d’Israël sur les États-Unis
U.S. says unable to conclusively determine chemical weapons used in Syria
Syrian rebels use toxic chemicals against govt troops near Damascus – state media
Syria Presents More Evidence on Mercenaries Use of Chemical Weapons
Syrian soldiers locate chemical agents in rebel tunnels near Damascus
‘Syrian troops find chemicals in rebel tunnels’
Syria lets UN inspect chemical attack site, Washington says too late
Syrie : les attaques chimiques ont été perpétrées par les rebelles
« Doctors » Behind Syrian Chemical Weapons Claims are Aiding Terrorists
VIDEO – Syria rebels’ chemical lab uncovered near Damascus
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich–Chemical Missile Launched by Syrian Rebels
Evidence Indicates that Syrian Government Did Not Launch a Chemical Weapon Attack Against Its People
VIDEO – Attaque chimique en Syrie : les doutes d’un expert
VIDEO – LOL!!! US says Syrian rebels ‘incapable’ of chemical attack
OOOPS!–Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack ‘prepared before incident’
New Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Another False Flag?
VIDEO – Syria: « Only Rebels Benefit from Recent Chemical Attack »
VIDEO – Ralph Schoenman: ‘Israeli False flag undertakings provide pretext for More Wars’
France: Force is an option in Syria if gas attack confirmed
VIDEO – Syrie : les amis de Laurent Fabius abattent leurs dernières cartes
Moyen-Orient: Netanyahu fait la leçon à Fabius
Israel and the US want Russia outside Middle East
Netanyahu: Syria is Iran’s ‘testing ground’
Attaquer la Syrie signerait la fin d’Israël, dit un officier iranien
Liban/Syrie : Le défi de Nasrallah à la guerre israélo-saoudienne !
President al-Assad: “Syria will Never become a Western Puppet State”
U.S. military officers have deep doubts about impact, wisdom of a U.S. strike on Syria
General Dempsey: Syria rebels wouldn’t support U.S. interests if they seized power
False Flag Involving Israel to Implicate Syria in the Works Says RT
Gilad Atzmon à propos de l’AIPAC et du patriotisme
Saudis, Israel Lobbying U.S. for Attack on Syria
Pro-Israel groups in United States scramble to save Syria strike resolution
The Syrian deal – More bad than good for Israel If Assad honors the deal to remove chemical weapons from Syria, then a very deadly weapon will be removed from Israel’s doorstep. The bad news is that Assad would be left standing, leaving Iran with a vital strategic ally.
Initial reluctance gone, AIPAC makes big push on Syria response Any reluctance Jewish groups initially had, it has evaporated after White House advisors consulted with Jewish leaders on the legislation proposal.
False Flag Involving Israel to Implicate Syria in the Works Says RT
Gilad Atzmon à propos de l’AIPAC et du patriotisme
Saudis, Israel Lobbying U.S. for Attack on Syria
The Syrian deal – More bad than good for Israel If Assad honors the deal to remove chemical weapons from Syria, then a very deadly weapon will be removed from Israel’s doorstep. The bad news is that Assad would be left standing, leaving Iran with a vital strategic ally.
VIDEO – PRESSTV Mark Glenn: US never intended to attack Syria from the beginning
Major arms shipment reaches Syrian rebels
Syrie : opération de commandos rebelles, israéliens et américains en cours
Syria says it captured Israeli weapons from rebels
Assad hails Syrian ‘unity,’ says Israel benefits from Arab unrest
Médecins sans frontières : une ONG directement impliquée aux côtés des groupes terroristes en Syrie
UN says Syrian child refugees top 1 million mark
Flashback: Palestinian injuries suggest Israel is using chemical weapons in Gaza
The latest allegations by the intrepid servants of International Zionism that the Syrian government launched a “chemical attack” on its own civilians in Damascus is just more desperate hogwash to justify Western intervention, terrorism and genocide of the Syrian people. This latest ploy is just another psychological warfare operation designed to demonize Assad and provide the West with a pretext to remove him from his rightful place as the head of the Syrian government. There is absolutely no reason why an intelligent and decent man like Assad would ever commit such a heinous act that would essentially hand his enemies the excuse they were looking for to invade and conquer his nation on a silver platter. This suggestion is not only idiotic, it is an insult to our intelligence.
All of the evidence shows that the rebel-terrorists are the ones who are using chemical weapons on civilians in a propaganda effort to blame these atrocities on the Syrian government. The rebel-terrorists most likely committed this latest atrocity too, with the help of their American, British and Israeli sponsors. The foreign-backed insurgents and terrorists who are tearing Syria apart are of the same foul, sadistic ilk that dismembered the nation of Libya several years ago. This madness and chaos is all part of a long-standing Zionist plan to reconfigure the middle east in the Zionists favour by eliminating all strong Arab leaders who refuse to submit to Israeli domination of the entire region and by fragmenting their nations into smaller, weaker states.
Oded Yinon, a rather puerile Jewish supremacist, authored a strategy paper in 1982 entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s” in which he laid out the framework of a plan to undermine and weaken all of the Arab nations surrounding Israel by instigating internal ethnic and religious conflicts. This is exactly what has transpired since the Israeli attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. About one hour after the Twin Towers were detonated with Israeli explosives, the Israeli war criminal Ehud Barak appeared on the BBC in which he listed one by one all of the countries that have since fallen victim to Western terrorism and aggression. Barak called for “immediate military action” against all of the States and resistance groups that pose a threat to Israeli hegemony. In his traditional manner of unfettered arrogance, Barak attempted to trick the viewers into believing that these countries were somehow a threat to the United States.
The Zionist plan for a “Greater Israel.”
It is nothing short of disgusting to see every major Western country doing the bidding of Zionist imperialism with such ferocious, passionate enthusiasm. The U.S., England, Germany and France have all threatened to attack Syria if this chemical weapons charge is “confirmed”. There is no doubt that these Western schemers will find a way to “confirm” Assad’s guilt using the usual methods of subterfuge and deception.
The sickening hypocrisy and sensational arrogance of American leaders regarding “chemical weapons” and the killing of civilians has reached ludicrous proportions. The United States has bombed and killed more civilians in the past twenty years than all other nations on earth combined. The U.S. military sprayed Agent Orange chemicals all over the place during the Vietnam war; a war that was initiated on the basis of an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin that never even happened. The U.S. military has used Depleted Uranium weapons in its genocidal war against Iraq, causing the cancer rates in certain Iraqi cities to skyrocket. Many Iraqi children are now being born with terrible birth defects and unbearable deformities. After the first Gulf War, which was initiated on the basis of an invented story of pure propaganda now known as the “Kuwaiti Incubator Baby Hoax,” the U.S. government imposed brutal sanctions on Iraq which caused the deaths of over 500,000 Iraqi children. Lest we forget, the United States dropped two nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War, incinerating hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians in a matter of seconds.
The United States supports Israel, a nation that was established through terrorism and ethnic cleansing; a nation which not only possesses some of the most deadly and dangerous chemical weapons and biological agents of destruction, but has used white phosphorous chemical bombs on Palestinian civilians. There were of course no Western government leaders condemning these crimes when they were happening. In fact, for the most part Western leaders supported these actions, defending the Israeli murderers with incorrigible conviction.
The inescapable conclusion of all of this is that our world is being run by psychopaths who may very well cause the extinction of the human species and the end of all life on earth as we know it.
Zander Fuerza
The Broader Stakes of the Syrian Crisis
VIDEO – Syria and the Greater Israel Project“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle EastYinon’s Revenge? A Panorama of Chaos in the Arab WorldThe Crises in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt: The Plan to ‘Divide and Conquer’ the Middle East and Why All Roads Lead to Tehran
VIDEO – BHL essaie de convaincre les américains
VIDEO – L’AIPAC, lobby pro israélien aux USA, appelle à la guerre à la SYRIE
Fri, 08/23/2013 – 20:01
Jobbik on the conflict in Syria.
Jobbik has always spoken out against the use of weapons banned by international law, therefore, if it is proven that such a case has indeed taken place, our party objects to the use of poison gas in Syria as well.
However, Jobbik is worried to see the sinister events developing in Syria as well as the systematic attempts of the West to find a casus belli for an armed intervention against the Assad government. Jobbik disowns the provocation as well as the anti-Assad stance of the West and the servile attitude of the Hungarian government that runs to rally behind its Western allies. Jobbik also objects to the support provided for the forces being organized against the Assad government which also represent Islam’s most extreme platforms, Wahhabism and Salafism and openly cooperate with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organisations. Not only does the West contradict itself by supporting terrorism, but subordinates the already fragile stability of tension-ridden Middle East to its own short-term goals.
Jobbik firmly believes that the UN Security Council, which represents the interests of the powers that view the Syrian conflict subjectively and in light of their own goals, is unable to conduct a fair investigation of the gas attack. This has already been proven ten years ago, in the case of the shameful Iraqi invasion that was built on a smear campaign and propaganda.
Jobbik stands for the Assad government, which enjoys the support of the overwhelming majority of the Syrian people and has built up an economically, culturally and politically stable country during its rule of over half a century in one of the most complex Middle Eastern countries in terms of ethnicity and religion. We hope that the Assad government will soon be able to stabilize the situation and continue its governmental activity in the interest of the Syrian people.
Márton Gyöngyösi, deputy leader of Jobbik’s Parliamentary Group
Les groupes juifs fauteurs de guerres pour Israël ont peur d’être reconnus pour ce qu’ils sont: des fauteurs de guerre pour Israël!
NYT excises AIPAC from Let’s Attack Syria story
September 2, 2013 Passage removed, H/T Niqnaq:
Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC was already at work pressing for military action against Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes US retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. House majority leader Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, has long worked to challenge Democrats’ traditional base among Jews. One administration official called AIPAC “the 800 lb gorilla in the room,” and said its allies in Congress had to be saying:
If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, we’re in trouble.
NewsDiffs reports that the article had no less than nine edits:
President Gains McCain’s Backing On Syria Attack (NYT), Change Log
By JACKIE CALMES, MICHAEL R. GORDON and ERIC SCHMITT | First archived on September 2, 2013, 1:18 p.m.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/middleeast/syria.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/world/middleeast/syria.html
Related articles
- AIPAC is trying to stay out of sight, but it will be worth watching the CPMAJO’s daily alert (niqnaq.wordpress.com)
- Why Is the Israel Lobby Keeping Quiet on Syria Crisis? (alethonews.wordpress.com)
FLASHBACK 2007:
Jewish Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
By Forward Staff
In early advocacy efforts on the issue, Jewish organizations stressed the threat that a nuclear Iran would pose to Israel in light of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s calls to “wipe Israel off the map.”
Now, with concerns mounting that Israel and its supporters might be blamed for any military confrontation, Jewish groups are seeking to widen their argument, asserting that an Iranian nuclear bomb would threaten the West and endanger pro-American Sunni Muslim states in the region.
Jess Hordes, Washington director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that the strategy of broadening the case against Iran was not an attempt to divert attention from the threats to Israel. “It is a fact that Iran is a danger to the whole world,” Hordes said. “We are not just saying it to hide our concerns about Israel.”
Yet many advocacy efforts, even when not linked to Israel, carry indelibly Jewish fingerprints. Last week, Jewish groups claimed victory when the United Nations approved a resolution denouncing Holocaust denial, with Iran’s regime as the obvious target. Additionally, numerous Jewish activists are pressing in advertisements and Internet appeals for Ahmadinejad to be indicted in The Hague for incitement to genocide.
In warning of possible scapegoating, insiders point to the experience of the Iraq War. Since the initial invasion in 2003, antiwar groups have charged, with growing vehemence, that the war was promoted by Jewish groups acting in Israel’s interest — even though the invasion enjoyed bipartisan backing and popular support, and was not at the top of most Jewish organizations’ agendas. The Iraq backlash prompted former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon to order in 2005 that his ministers keep a low profile on Iran.
Now, however, Jewish groups are indeed playing a lead role in pressing for a hard line on Iran. The campaign comes at a time when President Bush’s popularity has reached record lows and members of both parties are cautioning against a rush toward war.
Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, addressed the fears head-on last week in an address to Israel’s prestigious Herzliya Conference. Lamenting what he called “the poisoning of America,” Hoenlein painted a dire picture of American public discourse turning increasingly anti-Jewish and anti-Israel in the year ahead.
Hoenlein dated the trend to the 2005 arrest of two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, on charges of passing classified national security information. Hoenlein argued that the Jewish community made a major mistake by not forcefully criticizing the arrests. Speaking via video, Hoenlein listed several events that had occurred since then: the release of the essay criticizing the “Israel Lobby” by two distinguished professors, Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer; the publication of former president Jimmy Carter’s best-selling book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid”; the suggestion by former NATO supreme commander and Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark that “New York money people” were pushing America into war, and claims by former U.S. weapons inspector Scott Ritter that Israel is pushing the United States to attack Iran.
“In the beginning of the Iraq war they talked about the ‘neocons’ as a code word,” Hoenlein said. “Now we see that code words are no longer necessary.” He warned that the United States is nearing a situation similar to that of Britain, where delegitimization of Israel is widespread.
“This is a cancer that starts from the top and works its way down,” he said. “It poisons the opinions among elites which trickle down into society.”
According to Hoenlein, such critics tend not only to delegitimize Israel but also to “intimidate American Jews not to speak out.” He called on American Jews to take action against this phenomenon, saying that Christian Zionists seemed at times more willing than Jews to fight back.
Another instance of casting blame, less widely reported, was attributed to former secretary of state Colin Powell. In a new biography, by Washington Post writer Karen De Young, Powell is said to have put at least some of the blame for the Iraq war on Jewish groups. The book, “Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell,” claims that Powell used to refer to the pro-war advisers surrounding former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld as the “Jinsa crowd.” Jinsa is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war.
Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. “I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,” Neumann said.
Whatever worries exist about a negative backlash over Israel, they have not deterred Jewish and pro-Israel activists from publicly pressing for tough U.S. action against Tehran or invoking concern for Israel.
A particularly forceful argument for a hard line against Iran appeared this week in The New Republic, a Washington insider journal widely viewed as a bellwether of pro-Israel opinion. The lengthy article, written by two respected Israeli writers, Michael Oren and Yossi Klein Halevi, both fellows at the Shalem Center, a hawkish Jerusalem think tank, names Iran as the main threat to Israeli survival, regional stability and to the entire world order. This theme has been echoed in publications and press releases put out by most major Jewish groups, including Aipac and the Conference of Presidents.
FLASHBACK 2007:
Top Dem Wesley Clark Says ‘N.Y. Money People’ Pushing War With Iran
By Nathan Guttman
(…)Clark made his alleged remarks to liberal blogger Arianna Huffington in response to a United Press International column by Arnaud de Borchgrave. The column described the efforts of Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud — to compare Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Adolf Hitler, and the current geopolitical situation to pre-World War II Europe. The article quotes Netanyahu’s call to “immediately launch an intense, international, public relations front first and foremost on the U.S. The goal being to encourage President Bush to live up to specific pledges he would not allow Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons.”
Netanyahu has positioned himself in recent months as a leading voice outside Israel, calling the world’s attention to the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Though as leader of the opposition he does not speak for the government, Israeli sources have said in recent weeks that Netanyahu’s approach is in line with the strategy of the Olmert government.
Huffington quoted Clark as saying that the idea of bombing Iran before exhausting diplomatic avenues was “outrageous.” According to Huffington, she then asked Clark what made him so sure that the United States is headed in the direction of attacking Iran, and he replied:“You just have to read what’s in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided, but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.”
You just have to read what’s in the Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers.
That’s something that Americans need to know about, but they had better not count on the mass media to tell them about it.
Une stratégie pour Tel Aviv dans les années 80

L’Égypte, du fait de ses conflits internes, ne représente plus pour nous un problème stratégique, et il serait possible, en moins de 24 heures, de la faire revenir à l’état où elle se trouvait après la guerre de juin 1967. Le mythe de l’Égypte « leader du monde arabe » est bien mort (…) et, face à Israël et au reste du monde arabe, elle a perdu 50% de sa puissance. À court terme, elle pourra tirer avantage de la restitution du Sinaï, mais cela ne changera pas fondamentalement le rapport de force. En tant que corps centralisé, l’Égypte est déjà un cadavre, surtout si l’on tient compte de l’affrontement de plus en plus dur entre musulmans et chrétiens. Sa division en provinces géographiques distinctes doit être notre objectif politique pour les années 1990, sur le front occidental.


La Jordanie est un objectif stratégique dans l’immédiat. À long terme, elle ne constituera plus une menace pour nous après sa dissolution, la fin du règne de Hussein, et le transfert du pouvoir aux mains de la majorité palestinienne.

C’est à quoi doit tendre la politique israélienne. Ce changement signifiera la solution du problème de la rive occidentale, à forte densité de population arabe.
L’émigration de ces Arabes à l’Est —dans des conditions pacifiques ou à la suite d’une guerre— et le gel de leur croissance économique et démographique, sont les garanties des transformations à venir. Nous devons tout faire pour hâter ce processus.
Les Arabes israéliens doivent comprendre qu’ils ne pourront avoir de patrie qu’en Jordanie (…) et ne connaîtront de sécurité qu’en reconnaissant la souveraineté juive entre la mer et le Jourdain. (…) Il n’est plus possible, en cette entrée dans l’ère nucléaire, d’accepter que les trois quarts de la population juive se trouve concentrée sur un littoral surpeuplé et naturellement exposé ; la dispersion de cette population est un impératif majeur de notre politique intérieure. La Judée, la Samarie, et la Galilée, sont les seules garanties de notre survie nationale. Si nous ne devenons pas majoritaires dans les régions montagneuses, nous risquons de connaître le sort des Croisés, qui ont perdu ce pays.
Rééquilibrer la région sur le plan démographique, stratégique et économique, doit être notre principale ambition ; ceci comporte le contrôle des ressources en eau de la région qui va de Beer Sheba à la Haute-Galilée et qui est pratiquement vide de juifs aujourd’hui. »
par Hélios
Nationalism, Not ‘Exceptionalism’ the Proper Course for America
by Michael Collins Piper
During the 2012 campaign, Mitt Romney spoke of “American exceptionalism.”
“We are the one and only biggest boy [in the world today],” he wrote. “If there is to be justice in the world, America must create it. . . .We must pursue justice, help the suffering and overthrow tyrants. We must spread the creed.”
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen
« We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone.They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence — our existence, not our policies — threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission. »
The president has to rid himself of those officials who failed to lead their agencies effectively, along with those who lack the political will to wage war against the terror masters.The top people in the intelligence community need to be replaced, and those military leaders who tell the president that it can’t be done, or they just aren’t ready, or we need to do something else first, should be replaced as well, along with the people in the national security community who insisted that we must solve the Arab-Israeli question before the war can resume and the top people in agencies like the FAA, the INS, and so forth.’
Sur ce blog:
John McCain et les guerres pour Israël
Le « méchant » Vlad Poutine en remplacement du « méchant » Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
John McCain et les leçons de la Libye: « Bombardez la Syrie! »
Philip Zelikow (signataire du PNAC): La Libye est un modèle pour la redivision du Moyen-Orient
AL QAÏDA, ISRAËL: MÊME COMBAT!
La Syrie: prochaine cible du plan sioniste de chaotisation-remodelage du Moyen-Orient?
Pourim 2011 (19 et 20 mars) et l’attaque atlanto-sioniste en Libye
NY Times: Sans ennemi extérieur à combattre, Israël est voué à l’éclatement
Pourim: notre ennemi traditionnel a gagné la Seconde Guerre mondiale