- C’est en réaction à la menace très réelle que constitue l’arsenal nucléaire de l’état voyou israélien que les nations arabes comme la Syrie ont décidé de se munir d’un arsenal de destruction massive (chimique ou autre).
- Si des nations arabes comme la Syrie ont décidé de se munir d’un arsenal de destruction massive (chimique ou autre), c’était en réaction à la menace très réelle que constitue l’arsenal nucléaire de l’état voyou israélien.
- Concernant l’appui d’Israël aux rebelles syriens anti-Assad que l’on sait dirigés par al-Qaïda, l’ambassadeur d’Israël aux États-Unis, Michael Oren, a déclaré qu’Israël « préfère les bandits qui ne sont pas financés par l’Iran aux bandits financés par l’Iran ».
- Les politiciens sionistes et les groupes juifs et pro-israéliens (AIPAC, ADL, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations) poussent ouvertement en faveur d’une guerre contre la Syrie, tout en essayant de dissimuler et minimiser leur rôle dans cette affaire. La Syrie représente la pièce centrale de « l’arc stratégique » Liban-Syrie-Iran que veut détruire Israël.
- La Droite conservatrice républicaine en profite pour accuser Obama d’appuyer al-Qaïda, mais omet soigneusement de mentionner qu’Israël appuie ouvertement al-Qaïda et pousse le monde occidental à entrer en guerre (et non l’inverse).
|« Israël préfère qu’al-Qaida accède au pouvoir en Syrie »!
L’ambassadeur d’Israël à Washington Michael Oren a déclaré au quotidien américain Washington Post que l’intérêt d’Israël réside dans le renversement du Président Bachar el-Assad, même si c’est al-Qaida qui va accéder au pouvoir à sa place!
« Israël est intéressé par la chute du Président Assad. Il a toujours voulu le renverser, avant même la crise syrienne. Nous préférons les méchants qui ne sont pas soutenus par l’Iran aux méchants qui bénéficient de son appui. Nous avons voulu toujours le départ d’Assad », a-t-il dit.
Et d’ajouter : « Nous réalisons qu’il existe des gens très méchants parmi les rebelles, mais le plus grand danger pour Israël est représenté par l’axe stratégique qui s’étend de Téhéran à Beyrouth, en passant par Damas ».
« Nous trouvons que le régime d’Assad est la pierre angulaire qui maintient debout cet axe et telle est notre position avant même l’éclatement des événements en Syrie », a-t-il dit.
« Pour Israël, la ligne rouge est la possibilité que l’Iran ou la Syrie transporte des armes chimiques ou des armes non conventionnelles au Hezbollah ou à d’autres organisations terroristes. Dans ce cas, Israël ne restera pas passif », a insisté Oren, tout en démentant les rapports médiatiques faisant état du transfert d’armes chimiques syriennes au Hezbollah.
Dans le même cadre, le quotidien israélien « Maariv » a révélé que l’ambassadeur israélien à Washington, et avec l’autorisation de Netanyahu, a mené une série de réunions au Congrès américain pour convaincre le Sénat et les membres de la Chambre de soutenir une frappe militaire en Syrie.
Citant Oren, le journal a dit: « Evidemment, une série de réunions a été tenue », soulignant qu’il n’avait pas pris l’initiative, mais qu’il « était au service de ceux qui ont cherché à connaître la position d’Israël en la matière. »
Oren n’aurait pas tenu ces réunions s’il n’avait pas reçu le feu vert du Premier ministre israélien, poursuit le journal.
Aux efforts d’Oren s’ajoute une campagne assidue menée par le lobby sioniste à Washington, à la demande de la Maison Blanche, pour convaincre les membres du Congrès de voter en faveur d’une offensive contre la Syrie.
Syrie : Israël préfère le pouvoir d’al-Qaïda à la victoire d’al-Assad
La radio de l’armée israélienne a rapporté mardi que les responsables du gouvernement israélien préfèrent que la Syrie soit dirigée par l’organisation d’al-Qaïda à la victoire du président syrien, Bachar al-Assad, sur les rebelles qui combattent pour la chute de son régime.
Selon la radio militaire de l’Etat hébreu, relayée par arabic-upi, « une crainte règne au sein du gouvernement israélien envers la force grandissante de Bachar al-Assad dans les batailles opposant l’armée syrienne aux insurgés ». A ses yeux, « la gouvernance d’al-Qaïda en Syrie serait meilleure que la victoire de Bachar al-Assad ».
« Si la résistance de Bachar al-Assad se poursuit dans la confrontation avec les rebelles, et s’il continue à gouverner la Syrie, il serait très attaché à l’Iran et lui sera reconnaissant, ce qui est de nature à renforcer la place de l’Iran comme une puissance régionale menaçant Israël », estiment les responsables israéliens.
« La relation entre la Syrie, l’Iran et le Hezbollah sera renforcée et sera plus dangereuse pour Israël », ajoutent-ils, selon la radio.
« Il existe un seul Etat qui dit que son but est de supprimer Israël c’est l’Iran. Assad est l’Iran, n’importe quel pouvoir en Syrie est de ce fait préférable, même s’il s’agit d’al-Qaïda et de l’Islam radical, tout est moins pire qu’un Assad faible qui sera une marionnette entre les mains des Iraniens », considèrent les responsables israéliens.
Le ministre de la Défense israélien, Moshe Ya’alon, avait déclaré lundi lors de la réunion de la commission des Affaires étrangères et de la sûreté, relevant de la Knesset, que « les forces de l’armée syrienne contrôlent 40 % seulement des territoires syriens, et que seuls quatre quartiers à Damas sont sous leur contrôle ».
Selon ses dires, Israël suit avec inquiétude la possibilité que la Russie ravitaille la Syrie par le dispositif S-300. « Conformément à ce qui a été publié, ces missiles n’ont pas été encore acheminés, et s’ils venaient à être transférés, ils ne le seront qu’en 2014 », a-t-il indiqué.
Moshe Ya’alon a encore dit qu’ »Israël n’interviendrait pas dans la guerre en Syrie, tant qu’elle ne touche pas nos intérêts, y compris le transfert des armes développées, des missiles et de l’armement chimique au Hezbollah, et tant que le front n’est pas chauffé ».
L’Egypte se transformera en chaos comme en Irak, c’est encore Mordechai Kedar qui le déclare à un journal israélien. M.Kedar est un politologue qui a réalisé sa thèse sur la Syrie de Hafez El-Assad. Il a été pendant 25 ans officier des renseignements israéliens, spécialisé dans le contre-terrorisme et l’analyse des médias arabes. Maîtrisant cette langue, la télévision des Frères musulmans, Al-Jazeera le sollicite régulièrement pour « éclairer » l’opinion arabe. Il déclare publiquement préférer Al-Qaïda au régime actuel, pronostique une implosion de la Syrie en plusieurs entités, un chaos en Egypte et la division des palestiniens en plusieurs tribus. (…)
Ambassador Oren: Israel has wanted Assad ousted since Syria war began In interview with Jerusalem Post, Israel’s envoy to the U.S. says Jerusalem prefers ‘bad guys who aren’t backed by Iran’, adds that Assad’s overthrow could also weaken Hezbollah.
‘Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war
« Tehran-Damascus-Beirut arc is the greatest danger, » says outgoing Israeli envoy to US Michael Oren.
• Israelis admit they prefer U.S. enemies over Assad regime
• Now is the time to end American aid to Israeli terror state
By Michael Collins Piper
for American Free Press
(Issue 39, 2013)
Israel has finally admitted publicly (what has long been known): Israel would prefer rebels aligned with the al Qaeda terror network seize control in Syria, rather than the secular regime of Bashar al-Assad retaining power.
This eye-opening revelation will shock those who perceive Israel as America’s closest ally, particularly in the “war on terror” (aimed at al Qaeda) waged in the 12 years following the 9-11 attacks which the United States government claims were al Qaeda’s doing (despite profound evidence to the contrary).
Returning American troops—who fought against al Qaeda—and families of the dead will now rightly have some serious doubts about Israel. And troops still abroad will surely ask why they are fighting al Qaeda if America’s “best friend” supports that terror network’s ambitions in Syria.
Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, told The Jerusalem Post why Israel supports the al Qaeda-aligned forces
. While noting—of the rebels loyal to al Qaeda—that while Israel understands “they are pretty bad guys,” Oren told the Post
for an article published on Sept. 17
that Israel views Assad’s regime as “the keystone” in “the strategic arc” between Lebanon and Iran, the nation Israel is eager to destroy
“We always wanted Assad to go,” he said. “We always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran.”
So Israel believes al Qaeda-allied forces are useful for its own ends, America’s interests in the “war on terrorism” notwithstanding.
This eye-opening revelation will shock those who perceive Israel as America’s closest ally, particularly in the “war on terror” aimed at al Qaeda waged in the 12 years following the 9-11 attacks which the U.S. government claims were al Qaeda’s doing, despite profound evidence to the contrary.
Returning American troops—who fought against al Qaeda—and families of the dead will now rightly have some serious doubts about Israel. And troops still abroad will surely ask why they are fighting al Qaeda if America’s “best friend” supports that terror network’s ambitions in Syria.
From an American perspective, the toll in the Afghan and Iraqi wars has been staggering: 2.5 million Americans were deployed, about half of them more than once. Some 6,650 died. Another 106,000 were wounded in action or evacuated for injury or disease. Some 675,000 veterans of the war on terror applied for disability. Suicides and other deaths among returning troops—drug overdoses, car crashes etc—are unusually high.
say the wars will ultimately cost U.S. taxpayers some $5 trillion. And that figure does not include untold trillions Americans give Israel, much of it for purported assistance in the “war on terror” that is being waged against al Qaeda.
Now that Israel has betrayed America and supports al Qaeda, the U.S. should cut off relations with Israel, expel its diplomats and citizens from the United States, and henceforth consider Israel an enemy in the war on terror.
Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
The Piper Report Broadcast – Sept 24, 2013
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
Although Syria’s weapons of mass destruction— in this instance, chemical weapons —are now the focus of global media attention, what is largely suppressed in the mainstream media is the “back story” as to why Syria even has chemical weapons in the first place.
On April 17, 2003 veteran Washington Post correspondent Walter Pincus
, who happens to be Jewish, acknowledged in a story
relating to angry claims by the George W. Bush administration—relating to Syria’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction”— that Syria had built its arsenal as an “equalizer” and that “Israel’s arms spurred [Syria’s] fears.”
Although, at the time of Pincus’s story, Syria had asked for a United Nations resolution calling for nuclear arms inspections all across the Middle East—including Israel—few expected the United States would support Syria’s request. And, of course, the United States did not, despite the official U.S. position that, according to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, the United States wanted to see the entire Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.
Pincus’s article regarding Syria’s drive for a military arsenal designed to counter Israel’s nuclear weapons cache was instructive. Pincus wrote:
Syria’s current arsenal of chemical warheads and Scud missiles to deliver them was started more than 30 years ago to counter Israel’s development and possession of nuclear weapons, according to present and former U.S. intelligence officials.
“They have been developing chemical weapons as a force equalizer with the Israelis,” a former senior intelligence analyst said yesterday. “Hafez al-Assad, the present president’s father, saw chemicals as a way to threaten the Israelis and an equalizer for their nuclear program.” Assad knew, the former analyst said, that “military aid from the Soviets would never be able to match what Israel developed in the nuclear field and received from the U.S.”
Syria’s possession of chemical weapons was an important part of the Bush administration’s recent, week-long verbal offensive against Damascus. But it also has brought attention briefly to another highly sensitive issue: the impact that Israel’s nuclear arsenal has had on its enemies in the Middle East.
The consensus from Middle East experts is that almost every country in the region has pursued weapons of mass destruction programs— and they have done so primarily because of the arsenal that Israel has built up, said Joseph Cirincione, head of the non-proliferation programof the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
“You can’t get rid of chemical or biological or nuclear programs in Arab countries unless you also address the elimination of Israel’s nuclear and chemical programs,” Cirincione said.
Now, in recent days—despite overwhelming American popular opposition to an attack on Syria in retribution for its purported use of chemical weapons—we have seen the Jewish lobby in America loudly banging the drum for a U.S. military attack on Syria.
On Sept. 3 The Washington Post bared the truth in a story quite candidly headlined: “Pro-Israel and Jewish Groups Strongly Back Military Strike Against Syria.”
Noting that, theretofore, there had been “intense discussion” among pro-Israel partisans about whether they should be open about their concerns, the Post pointed out that that many in the Jewish lobby were “worried” that critics of the proposed attack on Syria were casting it “as a move to protect Israel’s interests rather than an action to defend U.S. credibility.”
One pro-Israel activist, who spoke in what the newspaper described as “the condition of anonymity” admitted to the Post, “There is a desire to not make this about Israel.” In other words, the Jewish lobbywould prefer the public not knowIsrael does indeed have an interest in seeing Syria subjected to American military might.
Later—even after President Obama’s address to the nation in which polls show he failed to convince Americans of the need to strike Syria—the Post reported on Sept. 9
that AIPAC had nonetheless mobilized its traditionally influential lobbying team—some 300 strong—to continue to besiege members of the House and the Senate demanding they support the attack.
However, despite the infamous Capitol Hill clout of the well-funded Jewish lobby groups, the good news is that public pressure on Congress against another Middle East war is so overwhelming that even the pro-Israel forces are being beaten back.
Now, with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s energetic intervention setting the stage for an agreement which seems to be undercutting the Jewish lobby’s push for war, it appears that for the first time in many years, that powerful lobby will be defeated.
Nonetheless, many people are still concerned that an angry Israeli leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, may engage in some covert measure such as a “false-flag” terrorist attack
on America—to be blamed on Syria or Iran or groups friendly to Syria and Iran—designed to redirect American public opinion.
The bottom line is that recent events have brought into widespread attention the fact that the Jewish lobby in America stands in opposition to the vast majority of the American people, who are saying, “No more U.S. intervention in the Middle East.” And many are beginning to see that those interventions have, in fact, been on behalf of Israel— not America.
Michael Collins Piper
is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth: Huey Long vs Wall Street, The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within, Target: Traficant
and The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb
The Zionists seem to have loose lips. Michael Oren, Israeli ambassador to the U.S., admitted in a recent interview that Israel prefers the throat-slitting Takfiri Jihadist militants over Assad.
This confirms what many political commentators have rightly postulated — that Israel and its American and British puppets, in collaboration with Saudi and Qatari kingpins, are covertly supporting the Takfiri terrorists who are stampeding their way across Syria, chopping off heads, cutting out hearts, machine-gunning captive prisoners and unleashing sarin gas on civilians.
Oren’s statement is consistent with the decades-old Israeli strategy of divide and conquer. Israel’s plans to destabilize and eventually destroy the nation of Syria was laid out in plain English by the Neoconservative cabal of Zionist Jews led by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith in 1996:
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions. (“A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” IASPS, 1996)
After issuing that sinister and deadly “Clean Break” strategy paper for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, Perle and Feith would go on to become the two of the three principal architects of the Iraq war from within the Bush Regime in 2003. The other was Paul Wolfowitz, a Zionist Jew with intimate ties to Israel.
Israel prefers Al-Qaeda over Syria’s al-Assad
Israeli envoy: Tel Aviv prefers Al-Qaeda groups rather than Iranian-backed groups.
Posted by: M. Klostermayr September 17, 2013
The Israeli envoy to the United States, Michael Oren, confirmed in a new statement that the Israeli regime in Tel Aviv fears the alliance of Syria, Iran, and Lebanon, and the Israeli Ambassador even confirmed that Tel Aviv prefers al-Qaeda jihadists rather than the secular government of Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad in Damascus. Although not Syria has recently attacked Israel, but the Israeli regime has conducted at least three airstrikes on Syria in 2013.
The Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, also said in his new statements that the alliance of Syria, Iran, and Lebanon would pose the greatest danger to Tel Aviv and that the regime in Israel prefers Al-Qaeda linked groups rather than groups that are supported by the Iranian administration. However, not the alliance of Iran, Syria, and Lebanon has carried out attacks on Israel, but the Israeli regime has conducted airstrikes on targets in Syria – at least three airstrikes in 2013, which all have violated international law and were acts of aggression.
But it seems that the alliance of Iran, Syria, and Lebanon, the so-called “Resistance Axis”, remains the main enemy of the Israeli regime in Tel Aviv and the rest simply doesn`t matter. Further, the statements by the Israeli envoy to the United States confirm that Israel rather supports the terrorist organization of Al-Qaeda than a secular government in the Middle East. Although Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad has never attacked Israel, the regime in Tel Aviv wants rather Al-Qaeda in power in Syria and the overthrow of the secular-minded President. And this, although Al-Qaeda should afterwards become a serious threat for Israel. In a normal world and in the case that the common information and propaganda about Al-Qaeda is correct.
Therefore, it is easy to assume that Israel backs the armed terrorist groups in Syria and even supports the Syrian al-Qaeda offshoots such as the al-Nusra Front (Jabhat al-Nusra
) in order to topple the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government in the capital, Damascus. Further, the regime in Tel Aviv wants to weaken the axis of resistance in the Middle East by supporting the terrorist groups and armed jihadists fighting in Syria. Not to mention that the Saudi regime also supports the Al-Qaeda-affiliated groups in Syria and that this is less surprising as the support for Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists by the Israeli regime.
In addition, it is already confirmed that the totalitarian dictatorship in Saudi Arabia is a lackey of the Zionist regime in Israel
and that both are in bed with the leadership of the United States. However, the Syrian-Iran-Lebanon alliance is certainly a threat for Israel because the alliance of resistance, including the resistance movement Hezbollah and other resistance groups in the region, have the power to destroy the occupation regime of Israel.
In case, it would come to such a dangerous situation of a new war in the Middle East. The first victim would certainly be Israel of such a new war by Western-led military forces (e.g. by the United States) against an Arab country in the Middle East. There are certainly several persons on both sides who are waiting for such a moment. However, no war is good and every war has to be prevented.
Israel’s Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, also explained in his statement that Israel always wanted “the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to go” and this has been the “initial message (by Israel) about the Syria issue.” According to the statements by the envoy of the Israeli regime to Washington, Tel Aviv was always willing to see the overthrow of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and his government before the beginning of the conflict and armed terrorism in March 2011. Primarily, because the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad and the government in Damascus certainly weakens the axis of resistance against Israel in the Middle East.
While some might consider it as somehow schizophrenic or even dangerous that Israeli rather supports and prefers al-Qaeda terrorists and jihadists than the mainly secular government of al-Assad in Damascus, it seems such a logic is valid for Michael Oren and the Israeli regime in Tel Aviv. However, as mentioned, it is to expect that in the case the Syrian al-Qaeda branch would overthrow the Syrian governance and President al-Assad, these armed terrorists would probably start to hate Israel again – despite the current support by the Israeli regime for their armed fighting against the Syrian Army and government.
Of course, the Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, has no shy to mention the real reasons for the support of Al-Qaeda in Syria. On the one hand, it weakens the axis of resistance and thus, the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah and also the Iranian administration in Tehran. On the other hand, a weak Syria would pose no threat for Israel and has no more abilities to support the axis of resistance or the Palestinians in the occupied areas. Israel would have an easier life and would be able to expand its territory even further and more easily.
The envoy of the Israeli regime to Washington said
that “greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc.” However, this is partly propaganda. On the one hand the usual propaganda by Israel and on the other hand a useful propaganda for the government in Syria, which supports the resistance against the Israeli regime but the phrase about “Syria being the keystone” is questionable. As said, Israel has attacked Syria, not vice versa. There is so much talking every day. The deeds show the true colours, not the words of any of those sides.
As mentioned in another article (see here
), the Israel’s hostility toward Syria and Lebanon has increased in recent months. Not vice versa, although probably due to the reason that e.g. Syria has no more capabilities to really support the axis of resistance or to carry out any acts against the Israeli regime in Tel Aviv.
Syria has been successfully weakened, but to which is extent is still questionable and it hopefully has never to be shown. However, while the Israeli envoy talks about the reasons why the regime in Tel Aviv prefers to support Al-Qaeda operatives rather than the secular government in Damascus or Iranian-backed groups, it is questionable if the members of the regime in Tel Aviv really consider all possible consequences of its support of Al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorists in Syria just for the reason that they are not “Iran”.
At least, one thing might be funny about the statements of the Israeli envoy. They really fear the axis of resistance and are still afraid of Syria. However, the propaganda is not quite correct by the Israeli Ambassador to the United States. As documents prove, there were several meetings and debates between Israel and Syria in recent years and especially when Bashar al-Assad came to power in Syria.
According to several information and documents, Syria’s President was never interested in a war on Israel. In contrary, he wanted to resolve several problems, but the Israeli regime has hampered or even dumped every attempt by al-Assad. Israel really is notoriously hostile, fearful, and a liar. Not to mention all its crimes against humanity since the establishment of the little state of Israel.
Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff of Colin Powell in the Bush Regime, has stated in an interview with The Real News Network
that U.S. senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, known for their servile groveling to Israeli interests, are “bordering on being traitors.”
In the second part of the interview Wilkerson confirmed what many political commentators have been saying for years, that Israel is engaged in a divide and conquer strategy in the Middle East to pave the path for their grand vision of a “Greater Israel”. Israel intends to weaken and undermine all of its regional competitors by instigating and fomenting internal conflict in those countries — just as they did in Lebanon in the 1980s.
Wilkerson recently stated that the chemical attack in Syria that took place in late August of this year was likely an Israeli false-flag operation.
By Michael Collins Piper
• ‘No smoking gun’ evidence that Syria used chemical weapons
• Israel the source for current charges of sarin gas use by Assad
One of America’s most respected military figures charged publicly that long-standing allegations about the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons may have been, in his words, “an Israeli false flag operation” calculated to stir up opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, long perceived by Israel as a threat to its geopolitical agenda.
And now that the United States seems poised to attack Syria on the basis of new claims about the use of such weapons, what former U.S. Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson told Current TV on May 3 bears noting.
A longtime military intimate of U.S. General Colin Powell, and later his chief of staff when Powell was secretary of state under “W” Bush, Wilkerson said his intelligence sources dismissed claims at that time that Assad’s military had used chemical weapons against terrorist forces.
Having loomed over Assad for months, that charge has been reinvigorated and the media revels in the possibility the U.S. will now attack Syria. However, the Los Angeles Times reported August 27 that Germany’s Focus magazine—citing a former Israeli intelligence official—said Israel was the primary source for current charges about Syria’s alleged use of chemical warfare.
Noting “U.S. intelligence sources long have relied on Israel to help provide intelligence about Syria” the Times didn’t mention it was also Israel that previously supplied the Bush administration much of the false data about supposed weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which provided the pretext for the invasion of that Arab republic.*
The mainstream media carefully suppresses the fact that—as demanded by the Israeli lobby in Washington—U.S. tax dollars (underwriting Israeli covert expertise) instigated the rebellion against Assad that led to the civil war that U.S. blood and treasure are now expected to resolve in a manner satisfactory to Israel.
Although the media suggests the Pentagon is eager for war on Syria, the fact is that—just as before the Iraq war when multiple military leaders were warning of the dangers of such a venture—top brass are likewise urging restraint vis-à-vis Syria. Even Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey recently told Congress that U.S. intervention in Syria would not be in America’s interests.
Yet, despite widespread public opposition to war, many Republicans and Democrats alike—bankrolled by pro-Israel campaign contributors—are clamoring for action.
* See THE GOLEM: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb and the Road to Global Armageddon for more data on this little-known scandal.
Michael Collins Piper Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
« Israel, everyone agrees, is an established nuclear weapon state. It was the sixth nation in the world—and the first in the Middle East—to develop and acquire nuclear weapons. Indeed, while exact figures are speculative, Israel’s nuclear forces are believed to be (in qualitative terms at least) more like those of France and the United Kingdom than India’s and Pakistan’s. Yet Israel’s code of conduct and discourse in the nuclear field differs distinctly from the other established nuclear weapon states. Unlike the seven acknowledged nuclear nations—the five de jure nuclear weapon states under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, and China) and the two de facto nuclear weapon states outside the NPT (India and Pakistan)—Israel has never advertised or even admitted its nuclear status __ Nobody—in or out of Israel—cares to ask Israeli leaders uncomfortable questions about the nation’s nuclear status… In Washington, and subsequently in other Western capitals, the Israeli bomb has become a most sensitive issue, almost untouchable … under which the United States treats Israel as a special (and unique) nuclear case. Under this policy, the United States has exercised its diplomatic influence and power to ignore and shield the Israeli case. Israel is treated as an exception, somehow exempt from the nonproliferation regime that applies to everyone else. Friends and foes of Israel (and of the United States) have to reckon with this aura of exceptionalism. For friends it is a matter of political embarrassment; for foes it highlights the double standard and inequality of America’s unevenhanded approach to non-proliferation. »
—Israeli historian Avner Cohen « The Last Taboo: Israel’s Bomb Revisited » Current History – April 2005 (in Michael Collins Piper’s The Golem
‘Back Story’ on Putin-Obama Deal: Plug Pulled on Israel, Warmongers
• Zionists up in arms that peaceful solutions to Mideast problems being considered
By Mark Glenn
NEW YORK, N.Y.—To say it has been a month of political roller coasters powerful enough to give even the most seasoned veterans a case of severe whiplash is an understatement. This all culminated when the U.S. president, for the first time in three-and-a-half decades, telephoned the newly elected Iranian president on Sept. 27 to discuss firsthand the future of the two countries they lead.
September began with the possibility of yet another military disaster in the Middle East for Israel’s benefit. By all appearances, a nagging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had finally gotten on President Barack Obama’s last nerve and pushed him into doing what he had resisted doing for the last four years—war with Syria.
The calls for war were built around circumstantial evidence implicating the Syrian government led by Bashar al-Assad in a chemical weapons attack that took place in a suburb of Damascus on Aug. 21. Secretary of State John Kerry was out in front, accusing the Syrian military of gassing its own people. Ghastly videos of children dying were quickly posted to the Internet for the world to see, and estimates of the death toll escalated to more than 1,400 Syrians.
It was Iraq all over again. In spite of weak proof that the Syrian military was actually behind the attack, it looked as thoughWashington had made up its mind and was going to war whether or not the Assad regime was responsible or not.
With up-to-the-minute news reports featuring U.S. military assets steaming toward the Syrian coast, the drama was breathlessly reported by the mainstream media.
And then, almost as quickly as it all started, the shouts for war ended abruptly. Suddenly, Obama announced there would be nomilitary action without Congress being brought in, just as the Constitution demands.
Of course, even themost politically naive would have a hard time leaving out of this curious political equation the fact that a few days before Obama had suddenly became a conscientious constitutionalist he and other world leaders met in St. Petersburg, Russia for the G20 conference. Equally difficult would be dismissing the possibility of Obama having discussed the messy business of Syria with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who up to this point had made it clear that, when it came to a war with Syria, “nyet” means “nyet” and that his country was not going to sit by as another Middle Eastern country was bombed into oblivion by the United States.
However, even the most optimistic watchers of politics found it hard to believe that the Russian president could rein in the lawless America. After all, Putin does not control the U.S. Congress, the U.S. media or the U.S. financial system like Netanyahu’s kith-n-kin. Jewish groups around the globe have made it clear that wars in the Middle East are vital for the continued survival of Israel.
It was against this backdrop that the crazy notion of an American president calling his Iranian counterpart on the phone actually took place on the last Friday in September, despite 34 years of silence between the two offices.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (third from right; shown with members
of the Israeli delegation), addressed the UN secretary general (not shown) during
the UN General Assembly in New York on Oct. 1. Netanyahu reiterated Israel’s belief
that only tough sanctions and a “credible military threat” would force Iran to bow
before Israel’s will. He also said Israel was not afraid to bomb Iran alone if he felt
it necessary.STAN HONDASTAN HONDA/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
The mainstream media was in an uproar over the phone call. Fox News headlined its report: “Netanyahu decries Iran’s Rouhani as ‘wolf in sheep’s clothing.’” The Washington Post titled its article:
“Worries about the Rouhani phone call.” And The New York Times printed this bizarre story: “Iranians Welcome Home Rouhani With Protest.”
However, Obama’s gesture in reaching out to Rouhani and intimating that a deal could be struck between the two nations to resolve the difficult diplomatic situation only makes sense when the events of the lastmonth involving Syria and Russia are factored in.
By all appearances, this is exactly what has taken place. An out-of-control America, firmly in the grip of the Israeli lobby and its voracious appetite for war, would not restrain itself on principles of the Constitution, the rule of law or even thebasic tenets of right versus wrong. The U.S. establishment would only stop the drive to war if it were trapped in a cave with a large, angry bear that was standing in its way.
Mark Glenn is a commentator and activist fluent in several languages. He is currently based in Idaho. See more from Glenn at www.crescentandcross.com.
Fri, 08/23/2013 – 20:01
Jobbik on the conflict in Syria.
Jobbik has always spoken out against the use of weapons banned by international law, therefore, if it is proven that such a case has indeed taken place, our party objects to the use of poison gas in Syria as well.
However, Jobbik is worried to see the sinister events developing in Syria as well as the systematic attempts of the West to find a casus belli for an armed intervention against the Assad government. Jobbik disowns the provocation as well as the anti-Assad stance of the West and the servile attitude of the Hungarian government that runs to rally behind its Western allies. Jobbik also objects to the support provided for the forces being organized against the Assad government which also represent Islam’s most extreme platforms, Wahhabism and Salafism and openly cooperate with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organisations. Not only does the West contradict itself by supporting terrorism, but subordinates the already fragile stability of tension-ridden Middle East to its own short-term goals.
Jobbik firmly believes that the UN Security Council, which represents the interests of the powers that view the Syrian conflict subjectively and in light of their own goals, is unable to conduct a fair investigation of the gas attack. This has already been proven ten years ago, in the case of the shameful Iraqi invasion that was built on a smear campaign and propaganda.
Jobbik stands for the Assad government, which enjoys the support of the overwhelming majority of the Syrian people and has built up an economically, culturally and politically stable country during its rule of over half a century in one of the most complex Middle Eastern countries in terms of ethnicity and religion. We hope that the Assad government will soon be able to stabilize the situation and continue its governmental activity in the interest of the Syrian people.
Márton Gyöngyösi, deputy leader of Jobbik’s Parliamentary Group
HAARETZ – Israel adamant it won’t ratify chemical arms treaty before hostile neighbors
Talk of deal to eliminate Syria’s stockpiles of chemical weapons sends jitters through Jerusalem; will Israel be next?
With Moscow and Washington now discussing a diplomatic deal that would rid Syria of its chemical weapons, officials in Jerusalem are preparing for the possibility that Israel will be asked to submit to supervision of the chemical weapons that foreign reports say it possesses.
In the past few days, Foreign Ministry officials note, senior Russian officials have repeatedly drawn a connection between Syria’s chemical weapons and Israel’s military capabilities. President Vladimir Putin, for instance, told Russian media outlets that Syria’s chemical weapons exist as a response to Israel’s military capabilities, while Russia’s ambassador to Paris told Radio France that Syria’s chemical weapons were meant to preserve its balance of deterrence against Israel, “which has nuclear weapons.”
Israel signed the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993, but never ratified it. Consequently, it hasn’t agreed to submit itself to international inspections or to refrain from steps that would violate the convention.
Syria, which has one of the largest chemical weapons arsenals in the world, has never even signed the convention, nor has Egypt, which also has a chemical weapons program. Iran, which suffered chemical weapons attacks from Iraq during their war in the 1980s, signed the convention in 1993 and ratified it in 1997. Nevertheless, senior figures at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem claim that Iran secretly maintains a large stash of chemical weapons.
Both Syria and Egypt used Israel as their excuse for not signing the convention. In various international forums over the years, Syrian and Egyptian officials have said their countries would agree to sign only if Israel signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and opened its nuclear reactor in Dimona to international inspectors.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor told Haaretz on Wednesday that Israel would not ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention as long as other states in the region with chemical weapons refuse to recognize Israel and threaten to destroy it.
“Unfortunately, while Israel signed the convention, other countries in the Middle East, including those that have used chemical weapons recently or in the past, or are believed to be working to improve their chemical capabilities, have failed to follow suit and have indicated that their position would remain unchanged even if Israel ratifies the convention,” Palmor said in a written statement. “Some of these states don’t recognize Israel’s right to exist and blatantly call to annihilate it. In this context, the chemical weapons threat against Israel and its civilian population is neither theoretical nor distant. Terror organizations, acting as proxies for certain regional states, similarly pose a chemical weapons threat. These threats cannot be ignored by Israel, in the assessment of possible ratification of the convention.”
Despite not having ratified the convention, Israel does have observer status at the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international agency that monitors the convention’s implementation, and participates in many of its meetings.
In early 2010, then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman sent a letter to the OPWC’s director general saying that Israel was interested in increasing its cooperation with the organization. But he also stressed that Israel wouldn’t sign the convention until it has signed peace treaties with all its neighbors and is no longer threatened by its neighbors’ chemical weapons.
U.S. State Department cables leaked to WikiLeaks reveal that the American administration held lengthy talks with Israel about the possibility of ratifying the convention, including at a February 2007 meeting in Jerusalem between senior State Department officials and their Israeli counterparts.
An American cable summing up the meeting said that U.S. officials urged the Israelis to move forward on this issue, stressing that Israel is one of only five countries that haven’t yet ratified the convention, with the others being North Korea, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon.
Alon Bar, then director of the Foreign Ministry’s arms control department, responded that Israel signed the convention in the early 1990s, when the peace process was at its height, and that since then, the situation had changed.
Israel’s chemical weapons policy is overseen by a Defense Ministry panel comprising about 20 senior representatives from the defense establishment and the intelligence community. The committee was established in 1991, dismantled in 2007 and reconstituted in 2009. It meets every few months, but in recent years it has spent very little time discussing chemical weapons.
Israel Adamant it won’t Ratify Chemical Arms Treaty as Hypocrisy abounds on Syria
YNETNEWS ISRAEL – Assad: Israel should be first to disarm
TIMES OF ISRAEL Assad says US must stop military threats, and Israel must sign WMD treaties
New Syria “CW Initiative”: But What About Israel’s Stockpile?
Israel worried it may be pushed to join chemical weapons ban
If Syria is scrutinized over chemical weapons, so must Israel
Zionists Panic as Assad Move Outsmarts them on Chemical Weapons
Putin: Syria’s chemical arms are response to Israel’s alleged nukes
‘Sign non-nuclear treaty’ Syrian FM delivers UNGA address, noting his country supports Palestinians’ right for state
Poutine : « Israël n’a pas besoin de l’arme nucléaire »
Fineprint: A new approach for Israel?
By Walter Pincus, Washington Post,
It can start by acknowledging its own nuclear weapons program.
It has accused Iran of seeking the capability to produce nuclear weapons, when for years Israel has been believed to possess hundreds of nuclear bombs and missiles, along with multiple delivery systems. It continues to insist it doesn’t have them.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders continue to accuse Tehran of deceit in describing its nuclear program as peaceful.
Perhaps Netanyahu sees Iran following the path Israel took 50 years ago when it’s known that his country joined the relatively small nuclear weapons club.
Back in the 1960s, Israel apparently hid the nuclear weapons program being carried on at its Negev Nuclear Research Center (NNRC) at Dimona. It deceived not only the international community but also its close U.S. ally. It repeatedly pledged « it would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the area. »
In early 1966, at the time of a U.S. sale of F-4 fighter-bombers to Israel, the Johnson administration insisted that Israel reaffirm that pledge. « Foreign Minister Abba Eban told Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara that Israel did not intend to build nuclear weapons, ‘so we will not use your aircraft to carry weapons we haven’t got and hope we will never have,' » according to the State Department’s Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XVIII.
Sound familiar? Maybe that’s why Netanyahu was so tough Tuesday during his U.N. General Assembly speech when attacking Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s statements that Tehran’s nuclear program is peaceful. When the Israeli prime minister asked, « Why would a country that claims to only want peaceful nuclear energy, why would such a country build hidden underground enrichment facilities? » I thought Dimona.
According to the bipartisan, Washington-based, Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Machon 2 facility at Dimona « is reportedly the most sensitive building in the NNRC, with six floors underground dedicated to activities identified as plutonium extraction, production of tritium and lithium-6, » for use in nuclear weapons.
So, along with easing up on the threats, what else could Israel be doing, perhaps with U.S. support? After all, since the 1960s, Washington has gone along with this idea of never openly acknowledging Israel’s nuclear weapons.
What about following the recent example of Russia and Syria? After Russian President Vladimir Putin and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad both refused to acknowledge Syria having chemical weapons, they did what Americans would call « a flip-flop. » They admitted that such weapons existed and that Damascus would join the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy the whole program.
Inspection teams from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons are on the ground in Syria. (…)
Perhaps it’s time to drop the facade hiding Israel’s nuclear weapons program from the public, since Washington and the Israeli government say more transparency is one of the goals sought when dealing with Iran’s nuclear program. It then might be easier to revive a once-planned conference on a Middle East nuclear free zone, linking it to progress made guaranteeing that Tehran’s program remains peaceful.
No doubt, there would be risk. Israel must ask itself if it is a chance worth taking.
VIDEO – NEW — Dr. David Duke Exposes Nuclear Netanyahu Hypocrisy
New York Times: Netanyahu on ‘Messianic Crusade’
NYTimes Op-Ed Never Appeared in US Edition – Let’s Be Honest About Israel’s Nukes
Egypt foreign minister calls for a nuclear-free Middle East
A “Nuclear-Free Zone” in the Middle East? Why Israel will not Join the Non-Proliferation Treaty
La condamnation par les États-Unis de l’usage des armes chimiques ne s’applique pas à Israël
Now Iran Turns Tables on Zionist Supremacists and their Nuclear Arsenal
Israel’s Chemical Weapons Stockpile Highlights Western Hypocrisy
WMD Double Standards: 51 UN Member States Vote to Keep Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal Hidden from Public View
Israel’s Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Weapons Threaten World Peace
U.S.: Singling out Israel at UN would harm efforts for nuclear-free Middle East
En fait c’est précisément l’inverse qui est vrai: s’attarder sur le cas d’Israel est la clé pour faire du Moyen-orient une zone sans nucléaire! Car c’était précisément à cause de l’arsenal nucléaire israélien que les pays voisins ont senti la nécessité de se procurer des armes chimiques!
Les fournisseurs de la Syrie et l’arsenal israélien en question
(…)Fayçal al-Maqdad, le vice-ministre syrien des AE, a balayé les accusations occidentales, rappelant avec ironie le flacon présenté en 2003 par Colin Powell, le secrétaire d’État américain, représentant la preuve d’armes chimiques que Saddam Hussein était sur le point d’utiliser pour exterminer son peuple.
Pour lui, ce sont les groupes islamistes qui auraient employé le gaz sarin que les États-Unis leur ont livré, dès lors qu’ils ont vu que ces terroristes perdaient du terrain. Aucune obligation morale de cette sorte n’est, cependant, invoquée à l’égard d’Israël, pays qui détient le plus important stock d’armes chimiques biologiques et nucléaires au Moyen-Orient, et qui est le seul État à ne pas avoir signé le traité de non-prolifération nucléaire. Ce n’est pas simplement qu’Israël possède un important arsenal d’armes chimiques. Il s’en est servi contre les Palestiniens en Cisjordanie et à Gaza : après l’éclatement de la deuxième Intifadha, il y a eu plusieurs incidents rapportés de soldats israéliens utilisant un “gaz inconnu” contre les Palestiniens, en particulier durant une campagne de six semaines, par les forces militaires israéliennes à Gaza, durant l’opération Plomb endurci.
Seven Israelis in Syria OPCW Chemical Weapons Team?
‘Syria army confiscates Israeli-made missiles’
TIMES OF ISRAEL – ‘Dayan pushed PM Meir to consider using nuclear weapons in 1973 war’
“We Used Chemical Weapons in Vietnam”: Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick Explain How Telling the Untold History Can Change the World for the Better
Winston Churchill’s shocking use of chemical weapons
Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
Le secret des gaz israéliens Ce sont les recherches israéliennes sur les armes chimiques et biologiques qui ont poussé historiquement la Syrie à rejeter la Convention interdisant les armes chimiques. C’est pourquoi la signature par Damas de ce document risque de mettre en lumière l’existence, et éventuellement la poursuite, de recherches sur des armes sélectives destinées à tuer les seules populations arabes.
Israel amassing WMD due to US backing
Un document de la CIA récemment découvert révèle qu’Israël a mis aussi en place son propre arsenal d’armes chimiques.
Des documents de la CIA révèlent des réserves israéliennes d’armes chimiques
Israel’s History of Chemical Weapons Use
Et si on parlait des stocks d’armes chimiques en Israël ?
Israel’s chemical weapons under the spotlight
Israel’s chemical arsenal under new scrutiny
Israel keeps mum on its chemical weapons
Israel Silent on Chemical Weapons
Les armes secrètes nucléaires, biologiques et chimiques d’Israël
JERUSALEM POST Report: CIA believes Israel acquired chemical weapons decades ago
‘Should there be a need’: The inside story of Israel’s chemical and biological arsenal
U.S. media suppressed 2009 UN report showing Israel using chemical weapons against Palestinians: Obama ignores Israel’s chemical weapons abuse while targeting Syria
Revisiting “Red Lines.” Saving Syria from Chemical Weapons by “Punishing” With Chemical Weapons?
British PM cites Holocaust as a reason for military action in Syria
Reid compares Assad’s attacks to Nazi gas chambers Senate majority leader tries to drum up support in Congress for American military actions against Syria
THE JEWISH WEEK – Jewish Leaders Push Back On ‘Warmonger’ Accusation
‘We have a dog in this fight,’ they say in supporting Obama on Syria strike.
Le dynamitage du monde musulman. Par Pierre Hillard
Glenn Beck: » I Personally Am Calling for the Impeachment of the President of the United States «
Les sionistes se servent des révélations sur l’appui US envers Al-Qaïda en Syrie pour attaquer Obama et demander sa destitution (comme pour l’affaire Snowden). Comme si c’était lui qui voulait aller en guerre… Les sionistes vont toujours trouver le moyen de blâmer Obama peu importe ce qu’il fait: s’il va pas en guerre c’est sa faute, s’il y va, c’est sa faute: « Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. » Faites attention au discours qui s’en prend à l’appui des USA envers al-Qaïda car cela peut aussi servir, de manière détournée, les plans d’Israël qui aime brandir constamment le spectre des « islamistes ».
‘Scandalous’: Israel fumes as US officials spill the beans on Syrian missile strike
Le renseignement américain informe les médias sur les bombardements israéliens en Syrie et à Gaza: Israel se sent trahie
Israel ‘furious’ with White House for leak on Syria strike
Israeli Warplanes Attacked Syria: Tel Aviv outraged by US Intelligence Leaks Concerning Strike
US claims Israel attacked Russian missile shipment in Syria Americans accused of damaging ‘trust between allies’ by revealing Latakia air strike
Airstrikes on Syria: Israel Acts While US and Europe Fret About Intelligence: Intelligence leaks attributed to Washington are a growing concern for the Israeli government (Aux yeux d’Israel, les USA sont en train de faire des Snowden d’eux-mêmes… c-à-d des « traîtres »!)
Foxman: Perceived U.S. weakness endangering Israel, American Jews
Ça montre que pour eux, il faut que les USA soient intimidants et face l’étalage de sa puissance en faisant des guerres et en inspirant la terreur dans le monde. Les USA sont leur « police mondiale », c’est leur Golem, leur assurance-vie! Si les USA ne font pu peur à personne, les juifs se croient vulnérables et sans défense!
Guerres impérialistes: Seule la guerre permanente fait survivre Israël…
Un analyste politique dit que le régime israélien a besoin de déclencher des guerres à travers le monde, spécifiquement au Moyen-Orient, s’il veut assurer sa survie et demeurer le récepteur principal de l’aide financière et militaire américaine, rapporte Press TV
Israel better off with Arab tyrants Op-ed: In the name of our egoistic interest, we only want dictators in our neighborhood. Let Washington deal with democracy and freedom of expression.
Quel aveu! C’est ça que je dis depuis longtemps. Israel veut juste des méchants arabes excités autour de lui, pour lui servir de repoussoir. Car si Israel est entouré d’États modérés et pleins de bon sens, c’est Israel qui passe pour le méchant.
Les médiats juifs tels que le New York Times dissimulent les efforts des groupes juifs pour pousser l’Occident en guerre en Syrie pour lsraël…
NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL – PLUS JAMAIS DE GUERRES POUR ISRAËL! Prévisible false flag israélien et pressions sionistes pour envoyer l’Occident se battre pour les intétêts d’Israël
Un lobbyiste pro-israélien appelle à provoquer un nouveau Pearl Harbor pour déclencher une guerre contre l’Iran
L’utilisation d’armes chimiques en Syrie pourrait être un false flag israélien, selon l’ancien chef de cabinet de Colin Powell sous l’administration Bush, le colonel à la retraite Lawrence Wilkerson
John McCain et les guerres pour Israël
Le printemps arabe: « une incroyable opportunité pour Israël », selon l’ancien directeur du Mossad Meir Dagan et le Maj. Gen. et criminel de guerre Yoav Galant’
A CLEAN BREAK’: un document incontournable du gvt israélien pour comprendre le projet du Grand Israël et les agressions impérialistes au Moyen-Orient
Roland Dumas, ancien ministre français des affaires étrangères: « Israël contrôle le service de renseignement français »
Le sanglant sacrifice rituel de Pourim 2012: la pire attaque contre Gaza depuis Plomb Durci
Élections US 2012: Encore une fois, comme après l’élection d’Obama en 2008, Israël s’en va-t-en-guerre. Après tout, c’est lui le patron
Les résultats de l’utilisation par Israël d’armes prohibées
Cancers et autres conséquences de l’utilisation par Israël d’armes prohibées par les lois internationales
Israël poursuit ses bombardements contre des civils dans Gaza: au tour des F-16, des armes illégales et d’une centaine de tanks de nettoyer la place
Armes non-conventionnelles expérimentées par Israël à Gaza
Gazés à Gaza
Déni de l’holocauste palestinien (Nakba) et criminalisation de sa mémoire par Israël
« Les Palestiniens et leur gouvernement doivent périr », déclare un rabbin orthodoxe israélien influent
Les soldats sionistes avaient reçu l’ordre de « nettoyer Gaza »
Le responsable des crimes de guerre à Gaza en 2009
Célébrer le meurtre des Palestiniens est une Mitzvah (bonne action), déclare un rabbin d’une colonie illégale
Les menaces d’Adam Pearlman (Gadahn), gracieuseté de l’organe de propagande sioniste SITE Intelligence Group
Le nouveau leader d’al Qaida est-il israélien?
Un Cohen dans les rangs d’al Qaida?
Les attentats revendiqués par al-Qaida… sur un site israélien de propagande
Incroyable! « al-Qaida » dément les théories du complot, défend Israël et attaque l’Iran et le Hezbollah!
Al Qaida ou Al Mossad?
Al-Qaeda et Israël, même combat contre la Syrie!
Le prochain 11 septembre sera-t-il concocté en Israël (et sera-t-il nucléaire)?
Inversion accusatoire : l’empire israélite accuse l’Iran d’être « la plus grave menace pour la paix dans le monde »
Après JFK et Obama, au tour de l’Onu de demander à Israël d’ouvrir ses installations nucléaires aux inspections
L’Iran ne croit pas la fable convenue du 11 septembre ; les États-Unis en mal de casus belli l’accusent d’avoir monté le coup
L’AIEA souhaite discuter des « activités » nucléaires d’Israël
Politique nucléaire talmudiste: une loi pour le peuple élu et une autre loi pour l’Iran
Conférence US: le nucléaire israélien brille par son absence
L’arsenal nucléaire israélien ne sera pas inspecté
Nucléaire iranien: les faux documents du Mossad
Israël a-t-il un programme nucléaire?
Israël rejette en bloc l’ONU comme étant « antisémite »
Le sionisme contre l’ONU
NYTimes: 16 agences US de renseignement confirment que l’Iran n’a pas la bombe // Le général Dempsey refuse d’être complice d’une attaque israélienne
Menace numéro un pour la sécurité mondiale: l’arsenal nucléaire israélien
Une blogosphère alerte et en santé est le dernier obstacle à une guerre contre l’Iran
La Grande-Bretagne craignait qu’Israël n’utilise la bombe atomique
L’affaire Lavon et le USS Liberty (Israël a utilisé une arme chimique – le Napalm – contre l’équipage américain du USS Liberty)
Vers un scénario de Troisième Guerre mondiale? Le rôle d’Israël dans le déclenchement d’une guerre contre l’Iran
L’Option Samson comme « justice ultime »
L’arsenal nucléaire israélien au centre de la guerre de l’administration Ben-Gourion contre J.F. Kennedy