La fable convenue de l’histoire est encore une fois confrontée à la dure réalité. L’histoire officielle ne peut plus nier que Rudolf Hess, condamné au procès de Nuremberg pour des crimes de guerre qu’il n’a pu commettre (puisqu’il était emprisonné par les Anglais durant toute la durée de la guerre!) et assassiné en prison, avait l’autorisation d’Hitler pour se rendre Angleterre en mission spéciale proposer un traité de paix. Mais Hess est tombé dans un piège tendu par les services secrets britanniques. Churchill aurait vu tous ses projets s’écrouler si Hitler avait réussi à éviter cette guerre inutile contre les démocraties. Churchill était l’instrument du groupe de financiers juifs The Focus, depuis qu’ils l’avaient sorti de sa banqueroute financière.
Vol de Rudolf Hess, suite : Churchill a refusé l’offre de paix de Hitler. Pour des « raisons morales » !
Voilà maintenant des semaines que la nouvelle est connue en Israël et en Grande-Bretagne, mais les grands médias américains gardent le silence sur la parution d’un nouveau livre écrit par un historien britannique de premier plan qui affirme qu’Adolf Hitler a cherché à obtenir la paix avec la Grande-Bretagne en 1941 mais que l’offre d’Hitler a été rejetée par le premier ministre Winston Churchill.
Dans Hess, Hitler and Churchill (PDF GRATUIT!), le célèbre écrivain Peter Padfield affirme que la légendaire « mission de paix » de Rudolf Hess, fidèle adjoint d’Hitler, en Grande-Bretagne en mai 1941 avait bien eu l’approbation d’Hitler et que Hess apportait de la part d’Hitler l’offre suivante : les forces allemandes se retiraient des pays qu’elles occupaient en Europe occidentale en échange du soutien de la Grande-Bretagne (ou du moins sa non-intervention) à une attaque imminente de l’Allemagne contre la Russie soviétique, dont il divulguait la date (fixée à cinq semaines plus tard).
(American Free Press)
• Adolf Hitler’s 1941 peace offer finally confirmed
by Michael Collins Piper
Nobel Peace Prize for Hitler? Holocaust® Lobby Burned Up Over Two New Books
It’s been news in Israel and in Britain for weeks now, but the American media is keeping under wraps the advent of a new book by a leading British historian which affirms that Adolf Hitler sought peace with Britain in 1941 but that Hitler’s offer was rejected by Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
Israel’s Ynet as well as The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail (both of London) reported this revelation that changes the “official” history of WWII and confirms what independent revisionist historians have said for years.
In Hess, Hitler and Churchill (FREE PDF!), renowned writer Peter Padfield affirms that the legendary “peace mission” to Britain in May 1941 by Hitler’s loyal deputy, Rudolf Hess, was indeed approved by Hitler and that Hess carried an offer from Hitler to withdraw German forces from occupied nations in Western Europe in return for Britain’s support for (or otherwise not frustrating) an impending German attack on Soviet Russia, the date of which (five weeks hence) was disclosed.
Hitler’s proposal—in the formal language of a peace treaty (typed on Hitler’s official stationery)—guaranteed Britain’s maintenance of its independence, its empire and all of its military forces.
The treaty proposed what translates into English as a state of “well-wishing neutrality” between Germany and Britain, something Hitler long endorsed.
Although, as The Telegraph noted, Hess’s journey has traditionally been dismissed as “the deranged solo mission of a madman,” independent writers have contended for years (based on data ignored or suppressed by the elite media and academia) that Hitler chose to deny his foreknowledge of the mission—in agreement in advance with Hess—if the mission failed, which it did.
Having evacuated his plane over Scotland, Hess expected to meet with British dignitaries interested in peace with Germany, only to be taken into custody by Churchill’s agents and held in solitary confinement for 46 years.
The details of his mission were suppressed by the Churchill government. Padfield contends Hess was the victim of a British intelligence operation, approved by Churchill, that was designed to lure the German peacemaker to Britain.
Padfield’s template reflects what others have described as a classic “double-cross” of the type British intelligence has long demonstrated an expertise in executing.
According to Padfield, one of his sources was an unnamed English academic. Along with others, Padfield was called in to translate the treaty for Churchill who (although presented with an English translation carried by Hess) wanted a translation produced by his own operatives.
The Telegraph reported, “There is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Mr. Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures,” noting Padfield has “also assembled other evidence to support the existence of the treaty and its contents—as well as the subsequent cover-up.”
Padfield claims Churchill made a “moral choice” to reject Hitler’s peace offer, noting Churchill had a fervent desire to go to war against Hitler and to bring the United States into the conflict.
In contrast, Churchill’s critics have said that his determined push for war against Hitler—in the face of widespread opposition among the English people and even within the British royal family—is attributable to the fact that, some years before (having been virtually bankrupt and facing the loss of his beloved ancestral home), Churchill was rescued from penury by a group of Jewish financiers—known as “the Focus”—who paid Churchill’s debts in return for doing their bidding.
In any case, as Padfield notes, public exposure of the peace mission by Hess would have undercut Churchill’s agitation for war. Hess was tried and convicted of “war crimes” at the post-war Nuremberg Tribunal despite the fact he was in no position to have committed any war crimes, having been in British custody throughout the war.
Sentenced to life in prison, Hess died at the Spandau prison in Germany in 1987, officially declared a suicide, though new evidence confirms that, as many long believed, the old man was actually murdered by the British. For more, see the article on page 19. (American Free Press, Sept. 21, 2013)
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.
Les britanniques ont-ils tué l’envoyé de la paix ?
par Ronald L. Ray
pour American Free Press
En mai 1941, le député national-socialiste Rudolf Hess s’est envolé en solo pour une mission secrète audacieuse de l’Allemagne à la Grande-Bretagne, apportant des propositions de paix autorisées par Adolf Hitler lui-même. Mais il a volé vers un piège tendu par le Premier ministre britannique Winston Churchill, qui avait l’intention de prolonger le carnage de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Hess a passé les 46 années suivantes en prison, souvent dans l’isolement. À l’âge de 93 ans, malgré les rapports d’une rumeur de libération imminente, l’homme malade et gravement arthritique, qui pouvait à peine tenir une cuillère ou se tenir debout out seul, se serait lui-même pendu. Ou l’a-t-il fait ?
Dans « Rudolf Hess: sa trahison et son meurtre », le dernier gardien et infirmier du leader nazi, Abdallah Melaouhi, expose les preuves que Hess a été assassiné par un soldat américain noir, Tony Jordan, et deux autres hommes habillés comme des soldats américains.
C’est le récit d’un témoin oculaire, Abdallah Melaouhi, l’infirmier tunisien qui s’est occupé de Rudolf Hess durant les cinq dernières années de sa vie à la prison Allied-run de Spandau. Durant cette période, le tunisien est devenu un proche confident de Hess. Voici son histoire. Edition anglaise exclusive. Comprend les témoignages de Melaouhi ainsi qu’une série de notes secrètes de Hess sur de nombreux sujets que son infirmier a sorti clandestinement de Spandau. Illustré. Couverture souple, 291 pages.
Aujourd’hui, des documents britanniques récemment déclassifiés, dont une partie d’un rapport d’autopsie, ont été publiés, ce qui corrobore le récit du courageux Melaouhi et en rajoute sur la question : Pourquoi les assassins de Hess n’ont-ils pas été traduits en justice ? En effet, pourquoi a-t-il été assassiné à la fin ?
En Mars 2012, le Daily Mail de Londres a publié des photos précédemment secrètes de la maison de jardin de la prison de Spandau à Berlin, prise l’après-midi de la mort. Les images montrent des signes évidents de lutte et d’autres détails fournis par ailleurs par la description de Melaouhi de ce qu’il a observé en ce jour fatidique d’Août 1987. La preuve photographique semble réfuter la déclamation bizarre des alliés comme quoi Hess se serait suicidé .
Plus récemment, le 6 Septembre, un autre journal de Londres, The Independent, a publié plus d’informations de 1989, précédemment top-secret qui pointent vers deux agents secrets britanniques anonymes déguisés en soldats américains, comme les assassins du vieil homme sans défense, qui espérait encore être réuni avec sa famille avant de mourir. Selon le rapport du détective surintendant en chef de Scotland Yard Howard Jones, un chirurgien anglais, le Dr Hugh Thomas, avait donné à Jones les noms des deux meurtriers présumés, lequel Thomas les avait reçus d’un ancien membre de la SAS.
L’informateur a également affirmé que c’était sur l’ordre du gouvernement britannique que Hess avait été assassiné dans le but de protéger certains secrets de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Jones pensait que cela impliquait un complot nazi visant à renverser le gouvernement de Churchill – une affirmation ridicule -, étant donné la nature pacifique de Hess et sa mission. Comme le fonctionnaire de Scotland Yard ne croyait pas qu’il y ait « beaucoup de substance » dans les déclarations du médecin, il ne recommanda pas que des eff effort efforts soient faits pour trouver les assassins et d’autres témoins.
Comme il n’est pas certain que ces hommes aient été correctement localisés, depuis lors le Directeur des Poursuites Publiques Sir Allan Green a annulé l’enquête. Apparemment , des forces puissantes avaient intérêt à dissimuler la vérité au monde .
Mais il est encore temps pour la justice. Vous pouvez lire le reste de l’incroyable véritable histoire de Rudolf Hess : sa trahison et son meurtre. Ensuite, contactez les gouvernements américain et britannique afin d’exiger qu’ils trouvent et poursuivent en justice les trois hommes qui ont tué Hess et leurs complices.
Ronald L. Rau est auteur indépendant. Il réside dans l’état libre du Kansas et est descendant de plusieurs patriotes de la guerre d’Indépendance américaine.
Question : Hitler Prix Nobel de la Paix 1941 ?
Did Brits Kill Peace Envoy?
• New documents substantiate claims in new book from TBR
By Ronald L. Ray
But he flew into a trap set by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who was intent on prolonging World War II’s blood- shed. Hess spent the next 46 years in prison, many in solitary confinement.
At the age of 93, with reports of an imminent release cir- culating, the ailing and severely arthritic man, who could hardly hold a spoon or stand up on his own, allegedly hanged himself. Or did he?
In Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder, the Nazi leader’s last caretaker and nurse, Abdallah Melaouhi, lays out the evidence that Hess was in fact murdered by black American soldier Tony Jordan and two other men dressed as U.S. soldiers.
Now, recently declassified British documents, including part of an autopsy report, have been pub- lished, which corroborate Melaouhi’s courageous account and raise again the question: Why have Hess’s murderers not been brought to justice?
Indeed, why was he murdered at all? In March 2012, London’s The Daily Mail published previously secret photographs of the garden house at Spandau Prison in Berlin from the after- noon of the death. The images show clear signs of struggle and other details provided otherwise only by Melaouhi’s description of what he observed on that fateful day in August 1987.
The photographic evidence appears to disprove the Allies’s bizarre claim that Hess committed suicide. Most recently, on Sept. 6, another London paper, The Independent, published additional, previously top-secret information from 1989 that points to two unnamed British secret agents, disguised as American soldiers, as the assassins of the defenseless, elderly man, who had yet hoped to be reunited with his family before dying.
According to this Scotland Yard report by Detective Chief Superintendent Howard Jones, an English surgeon, Dr. Hugh Thomas, had passed to Jones the names of the two alleged murderers, which Thomas had received from a former member of the SAS. The informant also claimed that it was upon the order of the British government that Hess was murdered in order to protect certain WWII secrets.
Jones thought this involved a Nazi plot to over- throw the Churchill government—a ridiculous assertion, given Hess’s peaceful nature and mission. While the Scotland Yard official did not believe there to be “much substance” to the doctor’s claims, he did recommend that efforts be made to find the killers and other witnesses.
It is not known, however, if those men were indeed located, since then-Director of Public Prosecutions Sir Allan Green quashed the investigation.
Apparently, powerful forces had a vested interest in concealing the truth from the world. But there is still time for justice.
You can read the rest of the amazing, true story in Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder. Then contact the U.S. and British governments to demand that they find and prosecute the three men and their co-conspirators who murdered Hess. (American Free Press, Sept. 21, 2013)
Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder is the accurate eyewitness account of Abdallah Melaouhi, the Tunisian male nurse who cared for Rudolf Hess for the last five years of his life at the Allied-run Spandau Prison. During that time the Tunisian be- came a close confidant of Hess. Here is his story. Exclusive English edition. Includes Melaouhiʼs eyewitness accounts plus a section of Hessʼs secret notes on many subjects that his nurse smuggled out of Spandau. Illustrated. Softcover, 291 pages, #643, $25 plus $5 Shipping and Handling inside the U.S. Outside U.S. add $24 Shipping and Handling. Send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. BONUS: Order within 10 days of receipt and we will throw in a FREE copy of Willis Cartoʼs A Straight Look at the Second World War.
Controversial Publisher Comments . . .
Hitler savait que Hess allait proposer la paix au Royaume-Uni
Par Laszlo Perelstein | publié le 27/09/2013 à 11h26, mis à jour le 27/09/2013 à 13h58
L’historien Peter Padfield, dans son livre Hess, Hitler and Churchill: the real turning point of the second World War – A secret history (le véritable tournant de la Seconde Guerre mondiale – Une histoire secrète) explique que le traité proposait un état de «wohlwollende Neutralitat» soit «neutralité désirée» entre les Britanniques et les Allemands. D’après le document, la date de l’attaque, alors imminente, d’Hitler contre l’Est aurait même été révélée.
A l’époque, le traité et la participation d’Hitler auraient été étouffés car cela aurait ruiné les efforts de Churchill pour impliquer les Etats-Unis dans la guerre, détruit sa coalition de gouvernements européens exilés et affaibli sa position en Grande-Bretagne. Hess est alors emprisonné dans la tour de Londres avant d’être jugé lors du procès de Nuremberg en 1946.
Les débris du Messerschmitt Bf 110 de Hess. Imperial War Museum via Wikimedia Commons.
Au vu de l’échec de la mission, Hitler prétend alors que Hess est devenu fou et a agi en renégat. L’historien Joachim Fest dans son livre Les Maîtres du IIIe Reich y voyait alors une «désobéissance constructive » de Hess, estimant que l’homme avait agi de sa propre volonté, sans l’accord du Führer.Une théorie que vient complètement contredire Padfield. L’historien s’appuie sur les témoignages de traducteurs ayant eu accès au document:
«Ce n’était pas un complot renégat. Hitler a envoyé Hess et il a ramené avec lui un traité de paix très détaillé pour l’Allemagne concernant l’évacuation de tous les pays occupés à l’Ouest.»
Ce n’est pas la première fois que cette théorie fait son apparition. En 2011, un document de 28 pages a été découvert dans les archives russes rapportant qu’Hitler était au courant de la mission, précise le Daily Mail. Ecrit en 1948 par le Major Karlheinz Pintsch, longtemps adjudant de Hess, il mentionne qu’Hitler souhaitait «qu’un accord avec les Anglais aboutisse».
Dans les mêmes archives, l’interrogatoire de Pintsch montre qu’Hitler n’était pas surpris en apprenant l’arrestation de son représentant officiel. Le Führer aurait alors lu à voix haute un passage d’une lettre envoyée par Hess:
«Et si le projet… se termine par un échec… il vous sera toujours possible de nier toute responsabilité. Dites simplement que j’avais perdu mes esprits.»
Plus récemment, au début du mois de septembre, un document de 300 pages rédigés par Hess pendant sa détention à Londres a refait surface avant d’être mis sans succès aux enchères. Les termes de l’accord de paix présenté à Churchill y sont inclus, mais quant à savoir si ceux sont proposés par Hitler, c’est un mystère.
Release Date: 3 Oct 2013
It reveals that:
Hess was lured to Britain in an MI6 ‘sting’ operation involving top-level British diplomats, with the knowledge of Winston Churchill.
Hess came on a deniable mission with the full knowledge of Hitler and Nazi ministers.
His reception party in this country probably included the Duke of Kent.
He brought documents with him that were concealed at the time – even from members of the government and Foreign Office – and which remain closed to the public.
These documents included a peace proposal typed in numbered clauses on Chancellery paper offering withdrawal of German forces from western occupied Europe if Britain would allow Germany a free hand in eastern Europe.
They detailed Hitler’s plans for the conquest of Russia and extermination of Bolshevism; and according to the account of an informant who learned of it from a Guards officer who questioned Hess, they specified the deportation of Jews – to save them from planned liquidation..
If these terms had become known – and not agreed because Hitler could not be trusted – it would have been catastrophic for ritain’s relations with America, the Jewish community and the heads of the exiled European governments in London.
It would also have meant open season on Churchill for the very powerful British interests campaigning for a ‘compromise peace.’
The explosive nature of these proposals ensured that they were buried at the time; the fact that after seventy years they remain hidden is proof of a continuing cover-up, presumably on account of their sensitivity in relation to the ‘holocaust’ and the image of Churchill’s conduct in the Second World War.
Hess’s death in Spandau gaol, Berlin, was certainly not suicide, but murder; naturally, this is also under official wraps.
Historian: Hitler offered Churchill peace deal in 1941
New book sheds light on Rudolph Hess’ ‘deranged solo mission’ to Britain, claims he brought with him treaty under which Nazis would withdraw from Western Europe
Published: 09.27.13, 10:13 / Israel News
The Telegraph said that in the book, historian Peter Padfield says a document that sheds light on the peace offer was revealed to him by an informant who claims that he and other German speakers were called in by MI6 to translate the treaty for Churchill.
The informant said the first two pages of the treaty detailed Hitler’s precise aims in Russia, followed by
sections detailing how Britain could keep its independence, Empire and armed services, and how the Nazis would withdraw from western Europe. The treaty proposed a state of “wohlwollende Neutralitat” – rendered as “well wishing neutrality,” between Britain and Germany, for the latter’s offensive against the USSR. The informant even said the date of the Hitler’s coming attack on the east was disclosed.
‘A turning point of the war.’ Churchill (Photo: EPA)
The Telegraph said Padfield, who has previously written a biography of Hess as well as ones of Karl Dönitz and Heinrich Himmler, believes the treaty was suppressed at the time, because it would have scuppered Churchill’s efforts to get the USA into the war, destroyed his coalition of exiled European governments, and weakened his position domestically, as it would have been seized on by what the author believes was a sizeable “negotiated peace” faction in Britain at that time. At the same time, since the mission had failed, it also suited Hitler to dismiss Hess as a rogue agent.
The British newspaper said there is no mention of the treaty in any of the official archives which have since been made public, but Padfield believes this is because there has been an ongoing cover-up to protect the reputations of powerful figures.
“This was a turning point of the war. Churchill could have accepted the offer, but he made a very moral choice. He was determined that Hitler, who could not be trusted, would not get away with it. He wanted the US in the war, and to defeat Hitler,” Padfield said.
Hess was kept captive in Britain until the end of the war when he was returned to Germany to stand trial at Nuremberg. He was sent to Spandau Prison where he died in 1987. The authorities said he had committed suicide, although his son and some historians have claimed the British state had him murdered to protect secrets.
By Jasper Copping, The Telegraph, 26 Sep 2013
David Irving’s newsletter Action Report On-line:
Piper talks about Peter Padfield’s new book « Hess, Hitler and Churchill: the real turning point of the second World War – A secret history »
FLASHBACK: Daily Mail – Hitler ‘gave go-ahead to Rudolf Hess mission to secure peace with Winston Churchill’
By Allan Hall In Berlin
UPDATED: 21:13 GMT, 29 May 2011
Rudolf Hess’s flight to Britain during World War Two in a bizarre attempt to secure peace was backed by Adolf Hitler, fresh documents claim.History has long recorded that the Nazi number three was acting alone when he piloted a Messerschmitt to Scotland in May 1941.He parachuted out over Renfrewshire and was arrested by a farmhand with a pitchfork.
Hess was, apparently, trying to contact the Duke of Hamilton to set peace talks with Winston Churchill in motion under his own initiative.
Hitler was even supposed to have scrambled aircraft to try to stop Hess, his deputy, from leaving Germany.
I Hate Ike: Congress Snubs WWII Vet
By Michael Collins Piper for American Free Press
As far as Congress is concerned, American veterans are expendable. That’s the impression many people have. In fact, Congress has turned a blind eye to at least some veterans’ concerns: the establishment of a taxpayer-financed $120 million memorial to an Americanmilitary leader guilty ofmass genocide—ex-President Dwight Eisenhower.
On Oct. 12, 2012 AFP described Ike’s sordid record and the congressional push to fund an Eisenhower memorial in an unsettling expose written by John Tiffany of THE BARNES REVIEW, the historical journal published byWillis Carto. A U.S. Army Purple Heart winner—wounded in combat in the Pacific in World War II—Carto wrote one of two further articles published in AFP on July 8, 2013 describing Eisenhower’s crimes. As AFP noted:
After World War II, Eisenhower was personally responsible for the deliberate genocide of nearly 2 million German prisoners of war who starved to death or died of disease and exposure, held in some 19 different outdoor pens (large fields surrounded by barbed wire) in sub-freezing weather without food, water or sanitation—open-air, excrement-filled holes. In one instance, some 560,000 of Ike’s victims were crowded into a death trap that would be fit for holding no more than 45,000 men.
“Instead of treating these soldiers as prisoners of war, as he was bound to do under the Geneva Convention,” wrote Carto, “Eisenhower invented a new category, designating them as ‘disarmed enemy personnel.’” This, Carto commented, was the “doubletalk of a pettifogging shyster lawyer” Eisenhower used to justify his crime.
In fact, Ike alsomurdered 2million former Russian POWs who sought to defect to the West to escape communist tyranny. Ike was personally responsible for the order that forcibly “repatriated” the Russian dissidents who were shipped back to the Soviet Union to certain execution.
Many World War II veterans responded favorably to Carto’s article, recalling, as AFP noted, that before Franklin D. Roosevelt promoted Eisenhower in 1943 to Allied Supreme Commander in Europe (over the heads of more than 50 seasoned officers)—a move that shocked the military establishment—Ike was a paper-pushing bureaucrat with no serious military experience.
Ike’s firstmajor test—his design for the invasion of Europe in 1944—nearly failed. Despite massive logistical superiority of the forces under his command, thousands of Allied soldiers died needlessly on D-Day.
On July 3, 2013 Carto wrote every member of Congress—enclosing the issue of AFP with its reports on Eisenhower—urging Congress to stop the Eisenhower memorial.
“As a holder of the Purple Heart award for wounds received in combat—an experience Eisenhower never had—I believe I have a right to bring this matter to your attention,” wrote Carto.
On Oct. 21, 2013—not having received even a single answer to his letter—Carto again wrote every member of Congress, asking that they respond to his latest letter. Carto pointed out that James Bacque had outlined Ike’s record in Other Losses.* So Eisenhower’s crimes were no secret: Bacque’s book had beenwidely publicized as a consequence of its controversial findings.
But as of Feb. 12, 2014 Carto had still not received a single letter from anyone in Congress regarding the memorial.
In the end, thememorial has proceeded as far as it has because, as Carto wrote in AFP, “No one has had the guts to point out that Eisenhower is literally the last person in theworldwho should be honored by the American people because his record clearly shows him to be a mass murderer.”
*Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II. Instead of praise, Ike should be remembered for his murder of millions of hapless German prisoners after World War II. Canadian reporter James Bacque revealed the chilling story of Ike’s mass murder of millions of disarmed, surrendered German soldiers in 1945 in his book Other Losses when no one elsewould. Other Losses (softcover, 324 pages, $20 plus $5 S&H in the U.S.) is available fromTBR, P.O. Box 15877,Washington,D.C. 20003. Call TBR toll free at 1-877-773-9077 to charge.
Get Your Copy of the January/February 2014 Issue of TBR
By Michael Collins Piper
Well, TBR takes that position, without hesitation and with no apology. And the reason for that is that no apology is necessary.
The truth is on TBR’s side and—as the wide-ranging material in this issue clearly demonstrates—the truth about Hitler and Third Reich Germany (both from a domestic standpoint and within the context of Germany’s role in global affairs prior to and during World War II) is far different from what has been painted by the mass media and academia.
There’s much more to the story than just “the Holocaust”—that recurring mantra to which we are subjected on a relentless basis (and which TBR quite regularly addresses froma Revisionist standpoint,much to the dismay of those who worship at the altar of the Holocaust Industry)—and this issue of TBR tries to fill in some of the many missing pieces of the puzzle in the bigger picture.
That’s why we are so enthusiastic about this particular “theme” issue: It underscores the critical need for honest reporting about the people and events in history that have brought us to where we are today.
So we are especially interested in hearing from potential readers about what we have presented in the pages of this issue—the first issue of volume 20. It is entirely unlike anything they’ll have ever read in any mainstream magazine, newspaper or textbook. And that’s precisely what TBR’s mission is all about: Bringing history into accord with the facts and tearing down the wall of lies about history.
To get a copy of this issue for $10, send payment to TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003 or call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge. If you decide to subscribe to TBR after reviewing the issue, we will take $10 off the subscription price of $46 (U.S.) and send you all newissues as they are published (five more issues) for 2014! Mention the ad in AFP issue 7 when responding.
Plutocracy Thrives on War
• Your fellow Americans need the truth found in AMERICAN FREE PRESS
By Willis A. Carto
And now the geniuses who run our foreign policy tell us that we must have troops in Afghanistan until 2024. After all, don’t we have to bring “democracy” to these mountaineers who like their country just the way it’s been for many centuries?
Afghanistan has never started any war with the United States. The Afghans just want to be left alone. But we can’t have that, now, can we?
The Afghans raise a lot of poppies. It’s a pretty flower. The fact that opium is made from poppies wouldn’t have anything to do with our foreign policy, would it? Or can it be that this profitable fact has something to do with our foreign policy? You wouldn’t suppose that some of the patriotic gents who run our foreign policy have their filthy hands in the till, would you?
This relatively minor situation can hardly be compared with our intervention into the European war that became World War I by our stupid intervention.
We lost 116,708 American men in that needless adventure, not tomention spending some $32 billion. The interest on that debt is accumulating and is now perhaps in the hundreds of billions of dollars, but who’s counting?
And then there was the European war that started when Winston Churchill declared war on a Germany that tried everything to avoid such a calamity. Franklin Roosevelt told us that we had to stop that madman, Adolf Hitler, before he conquered the world although that was not Hitler’s plan at all—all he wanted was to stop the communist aggressor, Josef Stalin. He even sent his deputy, Rudolf Hess, to Britain with a written peace offer for Churchill. But Hess was locked up and held in solitary confinement by Churchill for the rest of his life for having the boldness to try to stop the war. For Roosevelt, this was the golden opportunity he needed to get a third and even a fourth term. A good war has many advantages for criminal politicians.
Why can’t Americans realize that the political establishment feeds on war and rumors of war?
The war industry is extremely profitable for the makers of tanks, warplanes, battleships, uniforms, etc. They never have to worry about payment for their paraphernalia for war; the government always pays with your tax money or more national debt. And the latter has the advantage of bearing interest that the bankers and bondholders love.
Can the American people wake up and stop acting like children? Why doesn’t the rest of the media say what AMERICAN FREE PRESS does?
Since the rest of the media can’t be trusted to tell the American people what they need to know, the people’s only alternative is AFP. For that reason alone AFP should have at least a million subscribers.
So why doesn’t AFP have a million subscribers?
I am not sure, but let’s do something about it right now. . . .
On page 8 of this issue is a coupon offering 16 weeks of AFP to a friend for just $15. All you have to do is fill out the form, enclose $15 and send the form along with the address of the gift recipient to AFP. I will personally match every subscription that comes in from this coupon out of my own pocket. If every subscriber would do that, we could double our numbers overnight, and I’ll be happily applying for a loan at the bank.
Willis A. Carto is a longtime national editor and publisher. In 1955, Carto founded LIBERTY LOBBY, the first all-American, pro-middle class lobby group. In 1975 he launched The Spotlight newspaper which at one time had 375,000 subscribers. Currently he is the editor and publisher of THE BARNES REVIEW Revisionist history magazine. For a free sample issue and brochure, please contact TBR, P.O. Box 15877, Washington, D.C. 20003. Anyone who wants a free copy of Carto’s booklet A Straight Look at the SecondWorldWar need only send $1 to the above address. TBR also has a website carrying books that relate to the subjects covered above. These include Smedley Butler’s War Is a Racket, Joachim Hoffman’s Stalin’s War of Extermination, Victor Suvorov’s The Chief Culprit, David Irving’s Churchill’s War, Abdallah Melaouhi’s Rudolf Hess: His Betrayal and Murder and PerpetualWar for Perpetual Peace, edited by Harry Elmer Barnes. See more at www.barnesreview.com.
Lovin’ on Hitler
But then the denizens of The Barnes Review (TBR), a bimonthly journal dedicated to historical revisionism and denial of the Holocaust, aren’t really scholars. So it’s only a mild surprise that they’re now turning themselves inside out to make Hitler into a stand-up guy — the unfortunate victim of a slanderous campaign waged by those who worship at the “altar of the Holocaust industry.”
In TBR’s January/February issue, under the unambiguous title of “In Defense of Adolf Hitler,” the editors have thrown themselves behind the führer with all the enthusiasm of a Better Homes and Gardens special section dedicated to growing the best tulips. But even they understand they’ve crossed a line — a fact that Michael Collins Piper, a contributing editor, concedes in the lead editorial.
“[W]e should acknowledge that many of our new readers may, frankly, be startled by the theme of this issue, which — right up front — declares itself as standing ‘In Defense of Adolf Hitler,’” Piper wrote. “There aren’t many magazines anywhere — maybe we should say ‘there aren’t any magazines anywhere’ — that would take that position. Well, TBR does, without hesitation and with no apology.”
Well, color us unsurprised. When it comes to the distortion of facts in order to manipulate history, TBR remains in a class of its own. And it has pretty well always operated without hesitation or apologies.
Named after Harry Elmer Barnes, a prominent 20th-century anti-Semite and Holocaust denier, TBR was started and is still published by Willis Carto, who also founded the extreme-right Liberty Lobby and the Holocaust-denying Institute for Historical Review. Its mission over 20 years has been to bring “history into accord with the facts” in all kinds of cases. But in reality, it is obsessed with denying the Holocaust and denouncing the alleged evils of Jews. Today, it sells an “official” version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf, along with dubious books like Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence and The Work of All Ages: The Ongoing Plot to Rule the World From Biblical Times to the Present.
TBR even once suggested that Hitler was unfairly overlooked as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize. Seriously.
Now, with its special issue defending “one of the most misrepresented figures in all of history,” you might expect a nice collection of intriguing questions from TBR’s intrepid editors. When he wasn’t plotting world domination, wasn’t Hitler an avid lover of animals? When he wasn’t dealing with the “Jewish question,” didn’t he have a reputation for being great with kids? What was his personal recipe for Wiener Schnitzel, anyway? They might even have offered an article on Nazi grooming — “The Toothbrush Moustache: Time to Bring it Back?”
But they didn’t. When you look closely, TBR’s defense of the Nazi mass murderer relies on criticizing the enemies of the Third Reich and lionizing Hitler’s programs. There’s an attack on the “air terrorism” of the British. There’s a defense of the “loving and caring” Lebensborn program for unwed mothers, where “pure” Aryan women were encouraged to mate with SS officers and which included the kidnapping of perhaps a quarter million children from their parents.
The same issue also carries “The Hitler Youth Vindicated,” by Daniel W. Michaels, a former Defense Department official who says the paramilitary group merely instructed children in “the promotion of love of country and people; enjoyment of honest and open combat and of healthy physical activity; veneration of ethical and spiritual values; the placing of the common good ahead of individual gain; and the rejection of all values originating from Jewry.”
Still, even TBR admits that Hitler had a drawback.
“His major fault, if he can be criticized for that, is that he cared for and loved his own people, the German working class, who were deprived and robbed of their wealth and capital by the international bankers,” Cassian d’Ornellas, a retired teacher, wrote in one essay. D’Ornellas’ comment comes in an article that contains an important and never-before-reported fact: Contrary to what readers of TBR might think, Hitler was not, in fact, secretly funded by the Rothschilds.
La Seconde Guerre mondiale aurait pu prendre fin en 1943 Au fur et à mesure que les Anglo-Saxons étendent leur influence en Europe centrale et orientale, intégrant les anciens États du Pacte de Varsovie dans l’Union européenne et l’OTAN, ils procèdent a une révision historique de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. L’objectif de Londres et de Washington est de s’arroger l’exclusivité de la victoire contre le nazisme, de se poser en parangons de la démocratie, et d’assimiler communisme et nazisme dans une même opprobre. Les crimes du stalinisme sont placés en équivalence avec ceux de l’hitlérisme, tandis que ceux de la colonisation sont purement effacés.
Le devoir de mémoire: source de motivation pour Alex Jones dans son combat, fondement du nouvel ordre mondial pour le B’nai Brith
Gertrude Stein, juive, proposait de donner le Nobel de la paix à Hitler
Le jeu des devinettes: qu’ont en commun Al Capone et la contrebande d’alcool durant la prohibition, Meyer Lansky et l’armement de tsahal, Jack Ruby et l’assassinat de JFK, la production d’anthrax à Grosse-Ile au Québec et la Seconde guerre mondiale, John McCain et Rupert Murdoch, la guerre contre le nationalisme québecois et le nouveau chef des finances du parti Libéral canadien?
Zundel et son avocate Stoltz emprisonnés pour s’être penchés sur le complot du 11 septembre, condamnés pour « atteinte à la mémoire des morts »Avant qu’Hitler ne fut…