When remembering sharon, remember Qibya codenamed « Operation Shoshana » by the IDF
The reaction to the death of Ariel Sharon as an indicator in gauging the ‘health’ of the Jewish state.
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM
Butcher of Beirut Meets Maker
• True tale of genocidal terrorist Ariel Sharon needs telling
By Ronald L. Ray
Ariel “the Bulldozer” Sharon, former prime minister and alleged “king” of Israel, is dead at age 85. First, it was Nelson Mandela, a mass murderer who rose to destroy a once-great country. Then it was Edgar Bronfman, another “king of the Jews,” who ruled the far-flung dominions his mafioso father built.
Now Sharon has been judged, and his body has become food for worms. While lapdog media and pansy politicians laud the ostensible “lion of Judah,” AFP again presents the truth about this architect of the anti-Arab genocide in Zionist-occupied Palestine.
Acclaimed by his eulogists as a “peacemaker,” Sharon was amilitant, whomethodically sought to expand “Eretz Israel” (“Greater Israel”) ever further into the world, recognizing no borders but the “last tree planted” by a Jew. Even so, the thoughtful among those Jews, including many veterans of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), have admitted that Sharon was instead the butcher of babies and mothers.
He was one of the “founding generation” of terrorists who imposed Israel on the backs of native Palestinians. The list of his war crimes goes back at least to 1953, when young Sharon led a murderous raid on the village of Qibya. Sixty-nine innocent Palestinians were killed—two-thirds of whom were women and children—and 50 homes were destroyed. UN observers reported “bullet-riddled bodies near the doorways,” as evidence that the occupants were kept in their houses while the walls were brought down on them.
In the 1956 Sinai campaign, Sharon’s paratroopers cold-bloodedly executed 49 unarmed Egyptian prisoners of war. Israeli censors suppressed the story for decades, according to The Los Angeles Times in 1995. And Sharon established the infamous “Unit 101” retribution squads.
Between 700 (according to the Israelis) and 3,500 Palestinians weremassacred in the Lebanese refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila on Sept. 18, 1982. This brutal bloodbath was carried out by Lebanese, purportedly Christian, Phalangist militia.
But it was Sharon who expressly approved letting them into the camps, and an Israeli inquiry concluded that he bore “personal responsibility” for the murders.
Then there are the 240 or more defenseless Palestinians, including even the disabled, who were killed by the IDF in the 2002 “Operation Defensive Shield,” a prototype of Benjamin Netanyahu’s even deadlier “Operation Cast Lead” and the Israeli scorched-earth “Dahiya” military doctrine.
Infamous for stating, “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it,” Sharon went so far in 2001 as to declare all Jews above the law. “Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the state of Israel on trial,” he pontificated.
Sharon escaped retribution in this life, but the strict and just Judge of us all may well have decided differently.
Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author and an assistant editor of THE BARNES REVIEW. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War for Independence.
La position ultra-sioniste des néo-conservateurs « américains » est en droite ligne avec la pensée du juif d’extrême-droite Vladimir Jabotinsky, fondateur du Bétar et inspiration de l’organisation terroriste Irgoun, qui sous la direction du futur PM Menachem Begin, a perpétré le massacre de Deir Yassin et fait sauter l’hotel King David. L’Irgoun se métamorphosera plus tard en parti de droite extrême: le Likoud. (C’est ce même parti qui, sous le mandat d’Ariel Sharon, en 2002, érigera le Mur entourant la Palestine, réalisant ainsi le rêve du «Mur de Fer» de séparation ethnique imaginé en 1923 par Jabotinsky.) À l’inverse de la posture économique et socialiste (matérialiste et athée) du penseur sioniste Theodor Herzl, la posture sioniste de Vladimir Jabotinsky était identitaire: raciste, ultra-religieuse et fasciste. Netanyahou, le dirigeant du Likoud et actuel premier ministre d’Israël, est le meilleur exemple de la continuité sans faille des Likoudniks avec la pensée des fascistes juifs: non seulement son père BenZion était secrétaire de Jabotinsky, mais en plus Netanyahou est un étudiant assidu de la pensée de Jabotinsky. Netanyahou est directement connecté aux néo-conservateurs et l’on reconnaît son influence dans le contenu du Clean Break, écrit principalement par son proche ami Richard Perle. En fait, toute l’idée de la guerre au terrorisme vient du livre de Netanyahou paru en 1986, intitulé «Terrorism: How the West Can Win». Il prédit jusqu’à la guerre en Irak et en Afghanistan et appelle l’Occident à combattre les ennemis d’Israël, les Palestiniens et les Arabes, qui ne sont pour lui que des terroristes à supprimer. Le jour même du 11 septembre, Netanyahou déclarait que le drame du 11 septembre était «très bon pour les relations entre les États-Unis et Israël» (New York Times). Il a répété cette affirmation scandaleuse en 2008. (lire la suite dans Le mouvement juif néoconservateur: du troskyisme au sionisme belliciste)
SHARON RESPONSABLE DU MUR DE LA HONTE
(Emmurer les Palestiniens pour protéger… les Palestiniens? La guerre c’est la paix…)
Israel’s Gilad Sharon spills the beans: understanding Jewish culture is key to collective Israeli psychosis Gilad Atzmon says Gilad Sharon call for the total destruction of Gaza is rooted in the Old Testament and is fully consistent with Zionism, Israeli thinking and aspect of Jewish culture.
‘U.S. angered by claim that new building at E-1 aimed at Obama, not Palestinians’ Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Dan Kurtzer says Washington miffed by background briefing by Israeli official that tied E-1 announcement to Obama’s refusal to confirm 2004 Bush-Sharon letter.
In Response to Obama, Israeli Settlers Reject the ‘Auschwitz Borders’ of 1967 New York Times | May 19, 2011 || That resonant phrase, which suggests that Israelis would face genocideshould they withdraw fully from the land they have occupied since theend of the 1967 war, is based on a mangled version of a remark made bythe Israeli diplomat Abba Eban in 1969. According to Haaretz, Mr. Ebantold the German newsweekly Der Spiegel in that year: « We have openlysaid that the map will never again be the same as on June 4, 1967. Forus, this is a matter of security and of principles. The June map is forus equivalent to insecurity and danger. I do not exaggerate when I saythat it has for us something of a memory of Auschwitz. »Israeli leaders have frequently used some version of this phrase toinvoke the existential dread of the Holocaust when pressed to withdrawfrom the occupied territories as part of a peace agreement. In 2002, Ariel Sharon told William Safire that a proposed Saudi peace plan was unacceptable because, « Israel cannot return to the ’67 borders. Abba Eban long ago called them ‘Auschwitz borders’; Israel would not be able to exist. “
Critics’ concerns not quieted by Zuckerman election at Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations The coalition government of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon — about whom Zuckerman has written approvingly — rejects one of the report’s core recommendations: a freeze on Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
SHARON ET LA GUERRE EN IRAK
Sharon’s goal of achieving “Greater Israel” is part and parcel of the neo-conservative agenda and the ultimate in hate and imperialism. (The High Priests of War, Michael Collins Piper)
On February 18, 2003, the Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, reported that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was calling for the United States to move on Iran, Libya and Syria after what was presumed to be the successful destruction of Iraq by the United States—a view no different than that expressed by the aforementioned Krauthammer.
Sharon said: “These are irresponsible states, which must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction, and a successful American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve.” The Israeli prime minister told a visiting delegation of American congressmen that “the American action [against Iraq] is of vital importance.” (Ha’aretz, February 18, 2003.)(…)
Writing in The Washington Post on February 9, 2003, Robert G. Kaiser laid out the parameters of the Bush administration’s unswerving alliance with the “right wing” of Israel. Kaiser’s article, titled “Bush and Sharon Nearly Identical on Mideast Policy,” was a forthright assertion of the power of the “neo-conservatives” in directing the administration’s approach to Israel and the Arab world.
“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East: The Oded Yinon Plan, by Israel Shahak The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states.
Preparing the Chessboard for the « Clash of Civilizations »: Divide, Conquer and Rule the « New Middle East » In this context, it is no surprise that Ariel Sharon and Israel told Washington to attack Syria, Libya, and Iran after the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq.  Finally, it is worth knowing that the Israeli document also advocated for pre-emptive war to shape Israel’s geo-strategic environment and to carve out the « New Middle East. »  This is a policy that the U.S. would also adopt in 2001.
Flashback: Sharon says U.S. should also disarm Iran, Libya and Syria The coalition government of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon — about whom Zuckerman has written approvingly — rejects one of the report’s core recommendations: a freeze on Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Yet many advocacy efforts, even when not linked to Israel, carry indelibly Jewish fingerprints. Last week, Jewish groups claimed victory when the United Nations approved a resolution denouncing Holocaust denial, with Iran’s regime as the obvious target. Additionally, numerous Jewish activists are pressing in advertisements and Internet appeals for Ahmadinejad to be indicted in The Hague for incitement to genocide. In warning of possible scapegoating, insiders point to the experience of the Iraq War. Since the initial invasion in 2003, antiwar groups have charged, with growing vehemence, that the war was promoted by Jewish groups acting in Israel’s interest — even though the invasion enjoyed bipartisan backing and popular support, and was not at the top of most Jewish organizations’ agendas. The Iraq backlash prompted former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon to order in 2005 that his ministers keep a low profile on Iran.
A Sharon spy network in the Americas ? At least 50 Israelis have been held since Sept. 11 in San Diego, Houston, Kansas City, St. Louis, New York, and Cleveland. Dec 13, 2001
« The Power of Israel in the United States », Chapter 2: US-Iraq-Israel-Zionist Connection C’était pas les pétrolières ni le « complexe-militaro-industriel », c’était Israël!
SHARON ET LE 11 SEPTEMBRE
DEPUIS LE 11 SEPTEMBRE TOUT LEUR EST PERMIS! – Rivarol Il faut dire que quelques heures seulement après les attentats du 11-Septembre où l’on avait comme par magie identifié aussitôt le coupable (Ben Laden), une image était particulièrement frappante, celle du Premier ministre israélien d’alors, Ariel Sharon, sourire aux lèvres, expliquant que désormais l’Amérique savait ce qu’était le terrorisme auquel son pays est confronté.
Israel’s Prime Minister on 9/11 was the former Haganah terrorist, Ariel Sharon. Shortly after the attacks, the infamous war criminal and his terrorist colleagues in the Israeli military-intelligence establishment were overjoyed, concluding that the events of 9/11 were nothing less than a “Hanukkah miracle” of good fortune for Israel. Israeli journalist Aluf Benn described the jubilant reaction of Israel’s political and military leadership to 9/11, writing:
“The Israeli political-security establishment is coming to the conclusion that the terror attacks on September 11 were a kind of “Hanukkah miracle” for Israel, coming just as Israel was under increasing international pressure because of the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians.
Osama bin Laden’s September 11 attacks placed Israel firmly on the right side of the strategic map with the U.S., and put the Arab world at a disadvantage as it now faces its own difficult decisions about its future. That’s the impression left by the speeches given by Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and National Security Council chairman Maj. Gen. Uzi Dayan, at this week’s Herzliya conference on national security.
Dayan said yesterday that the global reality resulting from September 11 gives Israel and the U.S. “the chance for victory over a common enemy.” Halevy spoke about “a world war different from all its predecessors” and about global agreement that “combined all the elements of Islamic terror into one clear and identifiable format,” creating ‘a genuine dilemma for every ruler and every state in our region.
Each one must reach a moment of truth and decide how he will position himself in the campaign.’ » (“Israel Strives to Import America’s War on Terror,” Haaretz, Dec. 18, 2001.)(…)
Immediately assigning blame to your enemy is a tell-tale sign of a false-flag in action. Lo and behold, later in the day another Israeli war criminal would duplicate Barak’s finger pointing initiative. Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who described 9/11 as a “Hanukkah miracle” for his rogue nation, held a press conference on 9/11 in which he too blamed Islamists for the assault and called for an “international war on terror,” stating:
“The war against terror is an international war. A war of a coalition of the free world against all of the terror groups…This is a war between the good and the bad, between humanity and those who are bloodthirsty. The criminal attack today on innocent civilians in the United States, is a turning point in war against international terror. Even if the war against terror is long and even if the terror will try to raise its head again there won’t be any room in the world in which terrorists, their assistants and those who send them to be able to find a shelter or a refuge… The fight against terror is an international struggle of the free world against the forces of darkness who seek to destroy our liberty and our way of life. I believe that together we can defeat these forces of evil…” (“9/11 Ariel Sharon “Turning Point on Terror” Press Conference 5:00 pm,” YouTube)
(…) However, neither Ehud Barak nor Ariel Sharon was the first to employ the term ‘war on terror.’ That Orwellian phrase was originally coined in the 1980s by their partner in crime Benjamin Netanyahu — the leader of Israel’s ruling Likud Party, which is literally the birth child of the infamous 1940s Jewish terror gang known as the Irgun. In 1987, Netanyahu published a book titled “Terrorism: How the West Can Win” containing a number of essays and transcribed speeches from like-minded Jewish-Zionist gangsters which outlined a political blueprint for a global campaign — led by the “Western democracies” — of relentless pre-emptive warfare against anyone that the Jewish supremacists label as “terrorists.”(…)
The previously cited FBI report confirms that the dancing Israelis took 76 photographs of themselves, all of which show them to be “visibly happy.” The report also recounted some of the self-incriminating statements attributed to several of the dancing Israelis after being taken into custody. Oded Ellner confessed to being happy because he believed “that the United States will [now] take steps to stop terrorism in the world.” Omer Marmari is quoted in the report as having said that, “Israel now has hope that the world will now understand us.”
Why would they think that? And how did they know that these attacks would benefit Israel before anybody had the faintest clue as to who perpetrated them? These brazen statements by Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari—taken in conjunction with the proclamations of Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon on 9/11 that the USA should initiate and lead a new “global war on terror” —are dead giveaways as to Israel’s motive for committing 9/11: leading America by the nose on an endless path of war against their enemies in the Middle East!(…)
(…)The chairman of the Port Authority leading up to and on 9/11 was Lewis M. Eisenberg , a Zionist Jew. Eisenberg is a board member of the Republican Jewish Coalition, he was previously a partner of the Jewish bank Goldman, Sachs & Co., and he has also served on the board of directors of two of the most powerful pro-Israel pressure groups in the U.S., the United Jewish Appeal/Federation of New York and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). He is an active fundraiser for Republican politicians who tow the Zionist line on American Middle East policy as finance chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC) and was a major financial contributor to the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign in 2000. (Bob Feldman, “The Republican Jewish Coalition and the pro-Israel Lobby,” The Electronic Intifada, Feb. 21, 2005.) In his function as the Chairman of the Port Authority, Eisenberg oversaw the negotiations and transfer of the World Trade Center to his fellow Zionist Jews Larry A. Silverstein and his business partner Frank Lowy. Silverstein and Lowy were outbid by Vornado Reality Trust by $30 million, but tribal networking with their Zionist collaborator Eisenberg ensured they got the contract. (Andrew Rice, “Silverstein Recovers: Dark Horse May W in World Trade Center,” New York Observer, April 9, 2001.) On July 24, 2001, a mere six weeks before 9/11, Silverstein and Lowy suspiciously obtained a 99-year lease on the entire WTC Complex, in addition to WTC-7 which was already owned by Larry’s company Silverstein Properties. Leasing the WTC was a particularly bad investment. The Twin Towers were filled with asbestos, an illegal and toxic substance which required a costly removal procedure that would have produced a bill that would have rivaled the lease itself, yet oddly, Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them.” (“Asbestos in the WTC: Towers’ Destruction ‘Solved’ Asbestos Problem,” 911 Research WTC – 7 Website.)
The Jewish supremacist Larry Silverstein is a dedicated Zionist whose rabid support for Israel is not a secret. In his life, he has been involved with numerous Jewish supremacist organizations, Zionist fundraising schemes and is a major financial contributorto sham Jewish causes. He served as chairman of the board of the United Jewish Appeal and remains on the Board of Directors, along with his wife Klara. On its website, the UJA boasts ofhaving raised over $1 billion for the terrorist state of Israel over the past sixty years. Larry has also donated more than $1 million to the anti-German hate group known as the Museum of Jewish Heritage, a “living memorial to the holocaust,” and sits on its Board of Trustees. Silverstein has close ties with many of Israel’s bloodthirsty leaders who sit at the head of the ruling Likud Party. He is personal friends with no less than three former Israeli Prime Ministers: Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon. He was so friendly with Netanyahu that he had regular telephone conversations with him every Sunday afternoon. Sara Leibovich-Dar, writing for the Israeli paper Haaretz, made note of these relationships in an editorial entitled “Up In Smoke”. She wrote:
“Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center’s 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers–Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a “friend,” and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel –also called soon after the disaster. Yaakov Terner, the mayor of Be’er Sheva, sent a letter of condolence. Many Israeli politicians are acquainted in one degree or another with the 70-year-old Silverstein.”
Silverstein has even more conspicuous associations that solidify his guilt as 9/11′s “inside man” for Israel. In 1992, he co-founded the Israel Export Development Company (IEDC) which apparently sought to facilitate safer investment in Israel. (David Yerushalmi, “Resurrection,” The Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies) The IEDC is an offshoot of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), a hawkish pro-Israel “think tank” with branches in Israel and the U.S. which sought to promote wars against Israel’s regional enemies in the Middle East. (R. Marshall, “Right-Wing Extremists Endanger Israel and the Jews,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Dec. 1999) This ties Silverstein to the Zionist propaganda outfit that conceived the heinous policy document A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
This report was authored in 1996 as advice for Benjamin Netanyahu’s incoming Likud administration by Jewish neocon “thinkers” Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser. This group and the Zionist Jews associated with it would play a central role in the instigation of the war in Iraq in 2003. (…)
On a PBS program called “America Rebuilds,” Larry Silverstein tacitly confessed to the demolition of WTC-7, the 47 story steel skyscraper that was not hit by a plane, which collapsed into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds (nearly free fall speed) at around 5:20 in the afternoon on 9/11. His exact statement in reference to WTC-7 was:
“I remember getting a call from the…er…fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.’” (“America Rebuilds,” PBS)
“Pull it” is demolition industry jargon for destroying a building. Larry’s lame excuse for his Freudian slip was that he meant “pull the firefighters out of the building.” This is impossible because there were no firefighters in WTC-7 to speak of. According to FDNY fire chief Frank Fellini, all firefighters had been directed to steer clear of WTC-7 five or six hours before it came down. (New York Times, 12/3/2001) On 9/11, the mysterious collapse of WTC-7 was prematurely announced by the BBC on a live broadcast twenty minutes before it actually came down, further revealing the thoroughly scripted nature of the day’s events! (“ENHANCED VERSION: News Reports WTC7 Fell Before It Happens!,” YouTube) Having taken out a massive insurance policy on the WTC complex which covered “acts of terrorism” just sixweeks before 9/11, Larry Silverstein originally sought over $7 billion in an insurance payout as a result of the destruction of his complex.
He claimed that two planes crashing into two towers constituted two separate terrorist events and therefore required a double pay out. (“Insurers Debate: One Accident or Two?” Bloomberg News) This greedy Jew’s attempt at subterfuge did not exactly get the results he was looking for, but he did manage to squeeze $4.55 billion out of his insurers with the help of Michael Mukasey, a Jewish-Zionist judge who presided over the case and ruled in his favor. (Tom Topousis, “WTC Insure War Is Over,” New York Post, May 24, 2007 / Joseph Goldstein, “As Judge Leaves for Law Firm, His Legacy Is Remembered,” New York Sun, July 26, 2006.) Mukasey was later nominated as U.S. Attorney General by George W. Bush.
Silverstein’s business partner Frank Lowy is the co-founder of Westfield Group, which operates over 100 shopping centres in Australia, New Zealand, the United States and England.
He leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Lowy is a Hungarian Jew born in Czechoslovakia. In 1946, he made his way to the British Mandate of Palestine wherein hejoined the Jewish terrorist group known as Haganah to slaughter Palestinians and steal their land. A short time later he joined the Golani Brigade with whom he participated in the Nakba —the forced expulsion of nearly a million Palestinian Arabs from their homes, dozens of murderous massacres of Palestinians, and the decimation of hundreds of Palestinian villages, upon which the state of Israel was illegally formed in 1948. After his stint in Palestine as a Jewish terrorist, murderer and ethnic cleanser, Lowy moved to Sydney, Australia in 1952 whereupon he started up his retail property company Westfield Group, which has made him a very rich man. (Herb Keinon, “Frank Lowy: From Hagana to $3.8 billion magnate,” The Jerusalem Post, May 29, 2006.)
In regard to 9/11, it is important to note some of Lowy’s extensive ties to Israel, his cozy relations with Israeli politicians and his avid activism to further Zionism and Jewish domination around the world. The blogger Crimes of Zion unearthed a plethora of revealing connections between Frank Lowy and Israel’s ruling Zionist establishment in his article titled “Frank Lowy, Zionism and 9/11”. For instance, in 2001 Lowy was the Associate International Chairman of the Israel Democracy Institute and in 2003 he set up an international policy think tank devoted to foreign affairs called the Lowy Institute for International Policy. In 2006, he established the Israeli Institute for National Strategy and Policy at Tel Aviv University where bigwig I sraeli politicians and businessmen gather to brainstorm sinister ways to undermine the gentiles. (“Frank Lowy launches Tel Aviv University institute,” Globes Israel’s Business Arena, 29 May 2006.) Described by the Sydney Morning Herald as “a self-made man with a strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics,” Lowy spends three months of the year at his home in the Jewish crime enclave known as Israel. Lowy was very much involved in the dissemination of Zionist propaganda through media venues such as a publication called the Australia/Israel Review (AIR) where he served as vice president. This Jewish supremacist rag was the birth – child of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), the Australian equivalent of its American counterpart, AIPAC. A London Times article gave us this interesting piece of information, further illustrating Lowy’s raving Zionist fanaticism:
“Lowy has donated about £200,000 to build a memorial museum in Israel for his former brigade and has toured old battle sites with former comrades. His personal wealth was recently estimated by Forbes magazine at £1.5 billion and he is well known in Australia as a philanthropist supporting Je wish causes. Through the Westfield Foundation he has given to the United Israel Appeal, an organization for resettling Jewish immigrants in Israel. His family was last year preparing to invest more than £30m in property and media interests in Israel.” (“Blair’s envoy in new row over pay,” The Sunday Times, April 14, 2002.)
Frank Lowy maintains close personal relationships with Israeli political kingpins Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak and Barak’s brother Avinoam Brog. Brog confirmed Lowy’s highly influential standing in the Zionist state when he told the Sydney Morning Herald that Lowy’s “influence is such that if he wanted to talk to any politician in Israel, then he could. And they will listen.” (“The quiet benefactor: Lowy’s close ties with Israel,” The Sydney Morning Herald, Sept. 29 2008.) In addition to being a former terrorist, Lowy is also a crook. In 2006, it came to light that Lowy was implicated in a corruption scandal involving the then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Israeli media reported that Olmert had a conflict of interest because he advanced Frank Lowy’s interests in the privatization of a major Israeli bank, Bank Leumi. (“PM to face criminal inves tigation over Bank Leumi sale affair,” Haaretz, Jan. 16, 2007.) In the bid for Bank Leumi, Lowy’s business partners were the Jewish plutocrats Mortimer Zuckerman , who is the publisher and owner of New York Daily News, the chief editor of U.S. News & World Report as well as the former chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations; and Daniel Abraham, a prominent board member of AIPAC. Another crooked character that played an imperative role in the planning and preparation for 9/11 was the Jewish billionaire Ronald Lauder. Having inherited his fortune as the heir to his parents’ cosmetics empire Estée Lauder Companies, Lauder is an active Jewish supremacist lobbyist and a rather chauvinistic Zionist-Israeli partisan. Lauder is actively involved in numerous Zionist pressure groups and Jewish spy agencies masquerading as “civic organizations,” including the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Jewish National Fund, the World Jewish Congress (of which he was elected president on 10 June, 2007), the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Theological Seminary, Brandeis University, and the Abraham Fund. He also established a school carrying his name called The Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy for the Interdisciplinary Center of Herzliya (Israel), a Mossad recruiting center and operative training ground. It is stated on the website of the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya that the founding dean of Lauder’s Mossad school was none other than Ehud Sprinzak, the Israeli professor who told the UK’s Telegraph that 9/11 was the greatest public relations stunt ever committed in favor of Israel and Zionism.
In regard to 9/11, it is important to mention two more organizations that Lauder headed: the New York State Commission of Privatizationand the New York State Research Council on Privatization.
Through these groups, Lauder introduced the concept of privatization to the Port Authority. (“Green Acres,” New York Press, Feb. 8, 2005.) In this function, Lauder was the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the WTC, which fell right into the hands of his Zionist brethren: Silverstein and Lowy. According to the journalist Michael Massing, on Israeli issues Lauder “was a vocal Likudnik, with long-standing ties to Netanyahu,” and that during Netanyahu’s 1989 run for top office in Israel “the Jewish press carried reports that he [Lauder] had helped bankroll Netanyahu’s campaign for prime minister.” (“Deal Breakers,” The American Prospect Magazine, March 2002)
On the tenth anniversary of 9/11, Ronald Lauder wrote an obscenely propagandistic “opinion” piece that was published on the website of the World Jewish Congress, in which he forcefully propagated the official fairy tale of 9/11, essentially arguing that it is the duty of all Westerners to defend Israel and fight the Muslims in the name of “freedom, democracy and human rights.” These three terms are Judeo-Masonic code words. Jewish supremacists and their paid lackeys constantly invoke this deceptive slogan as a pretext for Western military intervention anywhere in the world where the Jewish power elite are having trouble dealing with
a certain group of rebellious non-Jews who are not acting like obedient, pacified slaves. What this slogan really means is that we must fight, not for “freedom, democracy and human rights,” but for “the divine right of the Jews to abuse, subjugate and enslave the non-Jews.”
The circumstances surrounding the private acquisitionof the World Trade Center in July of 2001 bears the distinct mark of Zion. Is it just a coincidence that every single person involved in the privatization, transfer and subsequent private ownership of the WTC were corporate billionaire Jews with a laundrylist of connections to powerful Jewish lobby groups, Zionist think tanks and the biggest shot-callers in the Israeli government, particularly the Likud Party? Is it just mere happenstance that two Jewish-Zionist bigwigs gained total control over the entire WTC complex just over a month before 9/11, and by doing so facilitated an event that proved to be a godsend for their elitist friends in Tel Aviv? In politics, there are no coincidences
Towards the end of July, 2001, two billionaire Jewish real estate developers who were friends with four Israeli prime ministers (excluding Yitzhak Rabin who was assassinated in 1995) took control of the World Trade Center (WTC) lease, and insured the buildings against terror attacks for billions of dollars, with a clause stating that in the event of a terrorist attack, the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease. Larry Silverstein was a friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak. Frank Lowy, who fought « in the Jewish underground », was a friend and business partner of Ehud Olmert. On September 4, 2001, one week prior to the 9/11 attacks, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. moved out of the WTC, transferring their HQ to Norfolk, Virginia. Six weeks after the new controllers had taken over the lease, the WTC was destroyed in terror attacks. Uncharacteristically, Silverstein did not breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower that day, and his two children were also spared as they also did not turn up for work at Silverstein Properties. The explanation provided was that Silverstein coincidently had a « dermatologist’s appointment » on the morning of 9/11/01, and his children were « running late« .
How many people are friends with three Israeli premiers? Even if six or seven thousand, such an exclusive group would be 1 in a million. And Larry Silverstein, the front man who took over the WTC lease six weeks before 9/11/01, and didn’t go to the Windows on the World restaurant on the morning of 9/11/01 although he had done so every other morning since July 26, 2001, happened to be from such a group.
The late Rabbi Meir Kahane—founder of the the Jewish Defense League, and a spiritual mentor of hard-line fundamentalists in Israel—exemplified those willing to sacrifice other Jews to guarantee Israel’s future. Kahane called for killing “Hellenist [i.e.Western-oriented] spiritually sick [Jews] who threaten the existence of Judaism.” And needless to say, that would include those Jews working in slick offices in the World Trade Center, living on Long Island, rather than kibbutzing in Israel.
Israeli journalist Yair Kotler reported in his book, Heil Kahane, that Kahane wrote that “the adoption of foreign, gentilized [i.e. non-Jewish] concepts by a Jewish state . . . opens the door to a national tragedy.”
In his own book, Time to Go Home, Kahane called for all Jews to “go home” to Israel—the only safe place for Jews. Those who refused to “go home” were not safe and expendable. The CIA’s 1979 report on Israeli intelligence said this widely-held view mirrors “the aggressively ideological nature of Zionism.”
In fact, this Jewish attitude toward the West (exactly what the media says is the Islamic attitude) has support at the Mossad’s top levels.
In The False Prophet, his biography of Rabbi Kahane, the late Robert I. Friedman revealed that “high-ranking members of Mossad” were directing Kahane and that the “central player” was former Mossad operations chief (and later prime minister) Yitzhak Shamir, an often hateful critic of the United States America.
When Kahane said America would become “the major enemy of Israel,” due to “economic disintegration which no administration can stem,” he enunciated a popular Israeli view, one which is not widely known, particularly to American Christian supporters of Israel.
In his Kahane biography, Friedman noted that Kahane’s views “have taken root and have become ‘respectable,’” and that right-wing Israeli leader Ariel Sharon was one of the “most potent supporters” of such extremism. In the Oct. 15, 2001 issue of the stridently pro-Israel New Republic, Israeli writer Yossi Klein Halevi echoed this view:
The destruction of the World Trade Center has partially rehabilitated, if only by default, the Zionist promise of safe refuge for the Jewish people.
In the last year, it had become a much-noted irony that Israel was the country where a Jew was most likely to be killed for being a Jew.
For many, the United States had beckoned as the real Jewish refuge; in a poll taken just before the bin Laden attacks, 37 percent of Israelis said their friends or relatives were discussing emigration.That probably changed on Sept. 11.
I was among the thousands of Israelis who crowded Kennedy Airport on the weekend after the attack, desperate to find a flight to Tel Aviv. “At least we’re going back where it’s safe,” people joked.
Everyone seemed to have a story about an Israeli living in New York who just barely escaped the devastation. If this could happen in Manhattan, the reasoning went, you might as well take your chances at home.
What Halevi described reflects the widespread ideology known as “catastrophic Zionism” which rejects America, saying Israel is the only safe Jewish refuge.
In The Ascendance of Israel’s Radical Right, Israeli scholar Ehud Sprinzak asserted that these views are “a major school” of modern Israeli thought. Sprinzak described the Israeli movement, Sikarikin, which honors ancient Jews who “conducted a systematic terror campaign against Jewish moderates who were ready to come to terms with the Romans on questions of religious purity.” Israelis consider these terrorists “the symbolic defenders of religious and nationalist purity.”
Another popular rabbi, Israel Ariel,would risk massive loss of Jewish lives to achieve the “elimination” of the Arab countries to guarantee Israel’s survival.The hawkish rabbi once proclaimed:
There is a ruling that a war is permitted as long as no more than one-sixth of the nation be killed. And this was stated in relation to an ordinary war, a fight between neighbors.
A war for Eretz Israel does not depend on the number of casualties. The command is “Ase!” (“Do it!”), and you may be sure that the number of casualties will thus be minimal. (…)
Ce ne sont pas des musulmans qui ont signé un bail de 99 ans sur les tours jumelles du WTC (les bâtiments 4 et 5 avec 400 000 pieds carrés d’espace de vente), qu’ils ont assuré pour des milliards de dollars contre des attaques terroristes éventuelles, cela six semaines avant les attaques terroristes réelles, et qui ont ensuite engagé (pour la déclaration de sinistre) un « ingénieur en structure » qui affirme à tort que l’acier perd la moitié de sa force à « 400 degrés ». Ce sont plutôt Larry Silverstein (accord négocié par Lewis Eisenberg de la Port Authority), l’ami de Benjamin Netanyahu (ainsi que d’Ariel Sharon et Ehud Barak) ainsi que son partenaire australien milliardaire et « survivant de l’Holocauste » Frank Lowy. Ce dernier s’est battu dans « le mouvement clandestin juif »; a été impliqué dans un scandale de corruption bancaire de haut niveau avec le premier ministre israélien Ehud Olmert; est connu pour avoir fait des pots de vin à Lord (Michael Abraham) Levy; et a été arrêté plusieurs fois en lien avec un scandale « du fric pour l’honneur » (Levy était « partenaire de tennis » et conseiller de Tony Blair).
By Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, 24 Dec., 2001
Were those hijackers really Arabs? Would Israeli agents carry out a suicide mission that could cost American Jewish lives? Consider these little-known facts . . .
In 1986, the New York-based leader of the terrorist Jewish Defense League, Victor Vancier, gave a prophetic hint of what may have been finally played out on Sept. 11, 2001:
« If you think the Shias in Lebanon are capable of fantastic acts of suicidal terrorism, the Jewish underground will strike targets that will make Americans gasp: ‘How could Jews do such things?' »
According to Vancier, quoted by Robert I. Friedman in The Village Voice on May 6, 1986, his allies were « desperate people » who « don’t care if they live or die. »
Considering this warning it is entirely conceivable the « Middle Eastern » men described by passengers on the airliners were not Arabs at all.
Evidence to be explored suggests that instead, these hijackers could well have been Israeli-sponsored fundamentalist Jewish fanatics (posing as « bin Laden Arabs ») hoping to instigate an all-out U.S. war against the Arab world.
« Jewish suicide bombers? Impossible! » cry critics. However, the fact is that there is a « suicide tradition » that is a much-revered part of Jewish history–going back to the famous mass suicide at Masada by Jewish zealots.
But in modern times, Israeli suicide missions have been undertaken. In The Other Side of Deception, former [Israeli] Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky described one 1989 venture: the participants were « all volunteers » advised that there was effectively « no possibility of rescue should they be caught. »
And what about the Arabic language heard on one airplane’s black box?
Consider a formerly secret CIA assessment, Israel: Foreign Intelligence and Security Services, dated March 1979, which reported that it is a long-standing policy for Israeli intelligence to disguise Jews as Arabs:
One of the established goals of the intelligence and security services is that each officer be fluent in Arabic. A nine-month, intensive Arabic-language course is given annually … to students …
As further training, these Mossad officers work in the [Israeli-controlled Arab lands] for two years to sharpen their language skills….
Many Israelis have come from Arab countries where they were born and educated and appear more Arab than Israeli …
By forging passports and identity documents of Arab and Western countries and providing sound background legends and cover, Mossad has successfully sent into Egypt and other Arab countries Israelis disguised and documented as Arabs or citizens of European countries….
These persons are also useful for their ability to pass completely for a citizen of the nation in question. The Israeli talent for counterfeiting or forging foreign passports and documents ably supports the agent’s authenticity.
Pulitzer Prize-winner Jack Anderson, a supporter of Israel, wrote on Sept. 17, 1972 that:
« Israeli agents–immigrants whose families had lived in Arab lands for generations–have a perfect knowledge of Arab dialects and customs. They have been able to infiltrate Arab governments with ease. »
On Sept. 29, 1998, Yossi Melman, writing in Israel’s Ha’aretz, revealed that:
« Shin Bet agents, who worked undercover in the Israeli-Arab sector in the 1950s, went as far as to marry Muslim women and have children with them, in an attempt to continue their mission without raising suspicion. »
In fact, serious questions have been raised about the identities of the Sept. 11 « Arab hijackers. »
While the [pro-Israel] media reported the ringleader’s passport conveniently landed atop rubble eight blocks from « Ground Zero, » The Orlando Sentinel also reported that at least four men identified as hijackers are not dead and had nothing to do with the attacks.
In The New Yorker on Oct. 8, Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh pointed out:
« Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues about the terroristsí identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, ‘Whatever trail was left was left deliberately–for the FBI to chase.' »
Why Arabs would plant evidence implicating their own is a point mainstream [pro-Israel] media chooses not to address.
Nor has the [pro-Israel] media ever ballyhooed the « hero » who tipped off the FBI where the hijackers’ car (conveniently filled with « evidence ») was parked.
And for those who would doubt that Israel would endanger American-Jews via terrorism, consider this: hard-line Israelis are willing to kill Jews if it means assuring Israel’s survival.
The late Rabbi Meir Kahane — founder of the Jewish Defense League and one spiritual mentor of fundamentalists who support Ariel Sharon — exemplifies those willing to sacrifice other Jews to guarantee Israel’s future.
Kahane called for killing « Hellenist [i.e. Western-oriented] spiritually sick [Jews] who threaten the existence of Judaism. » That would include those working in slick offices in the World Trade Center, living on Long Island, rather than kibbutzing in Israel.
Israeli journalist Yair Kotler reports in Heil Kahane that Kahane wrote: « the adoption of foreign, gentilized [i.e. non-Jewish] concepts by a Jewish state … opens the door to a national tragedy. »
In his book, Time to Go Home, Kahane called for all Jews to « go home » to Israel–the only safe place for Jews. Those who refused to « go home » were expendable. The CIA’s 1979 report on Israeli intelligence says this widely-held view mirrors « the aggressively ideological nature of Zionism. »
In fact, this Jewish attitude toward the West (exactly what the media says is the Islamic attitude) has support at the Mossad’s top levels.
Robert Friedman revealed that « high-ranking members of Mossad » were directing Kahane and that the « central player » was former Mossad operations chief (and later Prime Minister) Yitzhak Shamir, an outspoken critic of America.
When Kahane said America would become « the major enemy of Israel, » due to « economic disintegration, which no administration can stem, » he enunciated a popular Israeli view.
In his Kahane biography, The False Prophet, Robert I. Friedman noted that Kahane’s beliefs « have taken root and have become ‘respectable' » and that Ariel Sharon is one of the « most potent supporters » of such extremism.
In the Oct. 15 issue of The New Republic, Israeli writer Yossi Klein Halevi echoed this view:
« The destruction of the World Trade Center has partially rehabilitated, if only by default, the Zionist promise of safe refuge for the Jewish people.
In the last year, it had become a much-noted irony that Israel was the country where a Jew was most likely to be killed for being a Jew. For many, the United States had beckoned as the real Jewish refuge; in a poll taken just before the bin Laden attacks, 37 percent of Israelis said their friends or relatives were discussing emigration. That probably changed on Sept. 11.
I was among the thousands of Israelis who crowded Kennedy Airport on the weekend after the attack, desperate to find a flight to Tel Aviv. ‘At least weíre going back where it’s safe,’ people joked.
Everyone seemed to have a story about an Israeli living in New York who just barely escaped the devastation. If this could happen in Manhattan, the reasoning went, you might as well take your chances at home. »
What Halevi describes reflects the widespread ideology known as « catastrophic Zionism » which rejects America, saying Israel is the only safe Jewish refuge.
In The Ascendance of Israel’s Radical Right, Israeli scholar Ehud Sprinzak found that these views are « a major school » of modern Israeli thought.
Sprinzak described the Israeli movement, Sikarikin, which honors ancient Jews who « conducted a systematic terror campaign against Jewish moderates who were ready to come to terms with the Romans on questions of religious purity. » Israelis consider these terrorists « the symbolic defenders of religious and nationalist purity. »
Another popular rabbi, Israel Ariel, will risk massive loss of Jewish lives to achieve the « elimination » of the Arab countries to guarantee Israel’s survival. The hawkish rabbi proclaims:
« There is a ruling that a war is permitted as long as no more than one-sixth of the nation be killed. And this was stated in relation to an ordinary war, a fight between neighbors.
« A war for Eretz Israel does not depend on the number of casualties. The command is ‘Ase!’ (‘Do it!’), and you may be sure that the number of casualties will thus be minimal. »
As far as non-Jews, Sprinzak cites Rabbi David Bar-Haim who declares the concept Jews and non-Jews are equals « stands in total contrast to the Torah of Moses, and is derived from a total ignorance and an assimilation of alien Western values. »
Ben-Haim cites 10 religious authorities who « repeatedly proposed that Gentiles are more beast than human, » whereas, « only two authorities recognize non-Jews as full human beings created in the image of God. »
Bear in mind: these comments from supposed « allies » represent widespread opinion in Israel’s military and intelligence services.
Did Ariel Sharon help orchestrate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to instigate all-out U.S. war against Israel’s enemies? Don’t discount it.
Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, 2001
Judaism: Arabic-Speaking Jews Behind 9/11 Attacks?
Published: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:06 PM
An author named Michael Collins Piper wrote an article that appeared in London?s Arabic newspaper, Asharq al-Awsat, in which he suggests that Kahanist Jews in the Mossad could be behind the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. He poses two questions: ‘Were those hijackers really Arabs? Would Israeli agents carry out a suicide mission that could cost American Jewish lives’?
By way of an answer, Piper refers to a JDL leader quoted by Robert I. Friedman in the Village Voice as saying, in 1986, « If you think the Shias in Lebanon are capable of fantastic acts of suicidal terrorism, the Jewish underground will strike targets that will make Americans gasp: ‘How could Jews do such things’? » Therefore, the Asharq al-Awsat article continues, « it is entirely conceivable the ‘Middle Eastern’ men described by passengers on the airliners were not Arabs at all, instead, these hijackers could well have been Israeli-sponsored fundamentalist Jewish fanatics (posing as ‘Bin Laden Arabs’) hoping to instigate an all-out US war against the Arab world. »
The author tries to identify a ‘suicide tradition’ in Jewish history, ‘going back to the famous mass suicide at Masada by Jewish zealots.’ The article contains no other examples of this ‘tradition,’ but does mention the Israeli willingness, as reported by reputed ex-Mossad man Victor Ostrovsky, to undertake missions from which there would be no escape if they are caught.
The Arabic language heard on the black box of one airplane becomes more evidence of Mossad involvement, according to Piper, for « it is a long-standing policy for Israeli intelligence to disguise Jews as Arabs: One of the established goals of the intelligence and security services is that each officer be fluent in Arabic. Many Israelis have come from Arab countries where they were born and educated and appear more Arab than Israeli. » The author even quotes a 1998 article from Ha’aretz that reportedly alleges that Shin Bet agents operating among Israeli Arabs in the 1950’s even married Moslem women and had children with them in order to maintain their cover. Piper goes on to suggest that the evidence found linking the September attacks was far too conveniently placed and led to one conclusion that Arabs were involved. This leads him to ask, « Why Arabs would plant evidence implicating their own is a point mainstream [pro-Israel] media chooses not to address. »
Should one doubt that Israel would carry out an attack that could be calculated to kill so many American Jews, Piper declares, « Hard-line Israelis are willing to kill Jews if it means assuring Israel’s survival. » According to the Asharq al-Awsat article, Rabbi Meir Kahane « called for killing ‘Hellenist [i.e. Western-oriented] spiritually sick [Jews] who threaten the existence of Judaism.’ That would include those working in slick offices in the World Trade Center, living on Long Island, rather than kibbutzing in Israel. » According to Piper’s understanding, or lack thereof, when « Kahane called for all Jews to ‘go home’ to Israel, » that meant that ?[t]hose who refused to ‘go home’ were expendable.?
Yet, a few Jews writing essays is not enough to carry out the terrorist attacks of September, so the Asharq al-Awsat article claims that « this Jewish attitude toward the West (exactly what the media says is the Islamic attitude) has support at the Mossad’s top levels. » Furthermore, again depending on works by Robert I. Friedman, the article’s author states that « Ariel Sharon is one of the ‘most potent supporters’ of such extremism. » The article goes on to describe in depth what the author suggests is a possible motive for the attacks: To get Jews to see Israel as the last safe refuge. In order cause that to happen, Jewish lives, according to Piper’s understanding of Zionism, are expendable. Quoting another Israeli, Ehud Sprinzak, the article claims that « these views are ‘a major school’ of modern Israeli thought. » They also, according to Piper « represent widespread opinion in Israel’s military and intelligence services. »
The Asharq al-Awsat article concludes with, « Did Ariel Sharon help orchestrate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to instigate all-out US war against Israel’s enemies? Don’t discount it. »
11 septembre 2001 : le mensonge du siècle
Des enquêtes indépendantes permettent d’identifier Israël et les sionistes aux commandes des États-Unis, ceux-là même qui s’activent le plus dans la « guerre au terrorisme », comme étant les vrais responsables du 11 septembre.Ce n’est pas la première attaque terroriste israélienne perpétrée sous une fausse bannière (« false flag ») et portant le blâme sur les Arabes : notons les attentats de l’Hotel King David en 1946 (91 tués et 45 blessés), l’attaque contre l’Égypte en 1954 et le bombardement du navire américain USS Liberty en 1967 (35 marins étasuniens tués et 171 blessés). Il est intéressant de noter que les attentats de l’Hotel King David ont été commis par le mouvement terroriste juif sioniste Irgun, sous la direction de son fondateur Menachem Begin, qui devint rien de moins que président d’Israël. C’est du militant sioniste fasciste Vladimir Jabotinsky, admirateur de Mussolini et fondateur du Bétar, la toujours très active milice de défense juive, que se réclamait l’Irgun de Menachem Begin. Suite au massacre de centaines d’Arabes à Der Yassin par l’Irgun et la Stern gang en avril 1948, qui finalisa la partition de la Palestine et inaugura la fondation d’Israël, Begin affirma: « nous avons créé le terrorisme chez les Arabes ». L’Irgun se transforma ensuite en parti politique de droite : le Likud. C’est ce même parti qui, sous le mandat d’Ariel Sharon, érigera le Mur (une idée de Jabotinsky: « Le Rideau de Fer ») entourant la Palestine.
Trois analystes Juifs sionistes, Ashton Carter, John Deutch et Philip Zelikow, expliquaient déjà dans un article intitulé « The Catastrophic Terrorism: Imagining the Transforming Event », paru en 1998 dans la revue Foreign Affairs : « Un tel acte de terrorisme serait un événement catastrophique, une ligne de démarcation dans l’histoire américaine. Il impliquerait des pertes de vie et de propriété d’une ampleur sans précédent en temps de paix et minerait la signification de la sécurité en Amérique. Comme Pearl Harbor, cet événement diviserait notre passé et notre futur en un ‘avant’ et un ‘après’. » (trad. libre)
On retrouve la même idée dans le manifeste du think tank néoconservateur Plan for A New American Century (PNAC, 1997), où les faucons de la guerre en Irak révèlent qu’ils ont besoin d’un « nouveau Pearl Harbor » pour catalyser l’expansion hégémonique américaine: « Le processus de transformation, même s’il apporte des changements révolutionnaires, est susceptible d’être long, en l’absence d’un événement catastrophique catalyseur comme un nouveau Pearl Harbor ». Le 11 septembre fut précisément ce « nouveau Pearl Harbor ». L’analogie est d’autant plus pertinente que Roosevelt savait que Sous la direction de Robert Kagan et William Kristol (fils du trotskyiste et propagandiste anti-Soviet Irving Kristol et éditeur du journal Weekly Standard de Rupert Murdoch), le PNAC compte parmi ses membres : Paul Wolfowitz (ancien président de la banque mondiale), Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld (tous trois ont servi sous les administrations Reagan et Bush père), Richard Perle, le rabbin Dov Zakheim, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby (ancien directeur du bureau du v-p Cheney), Eliot Cohen, Donald Kagan, Jeb Bush, Steve Rosen, Daniel Pipes (protégé de Perle et fils du théoricien anti-Soviet Richard Pipes), Robert Zoellick (nouveau président de la banque mondiale), etc., tous sionistes et co-responsables (sous l’égide de Wolfowitz, Feith et Libby) de la guerre en Irak, une guerre pour les intérêts d’Israël. Parmi eux, seuls Bush, Cheney et Rumsfeld ne sont pas juifs.
Perle et Cheney, tous deux membres du Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), ont été tour à tour directeur du Jewish Institue for National Security Affairs (JINSA), un puissant lobby sioniste similaire à l’American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) et tout aussi partisan de la guerre au terrorisme, de la guerre en Irak et de la prochaine guerre contre l’Iran. Perle est très proche des Juifs sionistes Michael Ledeen (le théoricien de la « destruction créative » du Moyen-Orient) et Eliott Abrams (le gendre du gourou belliciste néo-con Norman Podhoretz). Les liens étroits de Perle avec Israël lui ont valu d’être investigué en 1970 pour avoir passé des secrets à Israël, comme Wolfowitz l’a été en 1978.
En fait, l’idée de la guerre au terrorisme vient du livre de Bibi Netanyahu « Terrorism: How the West Can Win » paru en 1986. Il prédit jusqu’à la guerre en Irak et en Afghanistan et appelle l’Occident à combattre les ennemis d’Israël, les Palestiniens et les Arabes, qui ne sont pour lui que des terroristes à anéantir.
Le lendemain du 11 septembre, Netanyahu déclarait que cet événement est « très bon pour les relations entre les États-Unis et Israël » (Jerusalem Post).
Un quotidien israélien a rapporté le fait que de nombreux Juifs travaillant au complexe du World Trade Center (propriété du Juif sioniste Larry Silverstein) ont reçu un appel par messagerie Odigo (propriété de la compagnie israélienne de surveillance Comverse) leur informant de ne pas se rendre au travail ce matin-là.
Cinq Israéliens ont été aperçus sautant de joie à la vue de l’effondrement du WTC. Dans leur camion de déménagement de la compagnie Urban Moving System, les policiers qui les ont interceptés ont trouvé des passeports israéliens, des habits musulmans et des explosifs (en effet tout indique que les tours ont été démolies de manière contrôlée à l’aide d’explosifs et non pas par l’affaiblissement de la structure sous la chaleur du feu de carburant-kérosene). Ces agents du Mossad prétendirent avoir été envoyés là pour « documenter l’événement », ce qui implique une connaissance préalable du lieu, de la date et de l’heure exacte de l’attaque. Quelques mois après le 11 septembre, Fox News révélait qu’un réseau d’agents du Mossad utilisant la technologie Comverse opérait sous le couvert de compagnies de déménagement, de messagerie instantanée (Odigo), de kiosque à jouets dans les aéroports, et même d’étudiants en Arts. Le lendemain du 11 septembre, mille de ces kiosques ont fermé et les agents sont retournés en Israël. Avant et après le 11 septembre, indique Fox News, une centaine d’Israéliens ont été arrêtés en sol américain, interrogés puis relâchés grâce au Juif sioniste Michael Chertoff (Homeland Security), mais le sujet est classé ‘secret défense’.
SHARON ET LA MORT D’ARAFAT
BBC – 2 April, 2004 Israeli premier threatens Arafat Sharon: Arafat should not « feel immune » to being targetedIsraeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has given a thinly-veiled warning that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat could be targeted for assassination.
SHARON DÉTESTÉ PAR LES COLONS JUIFS
Sniegoski Stephen J. – The Transparent Cabal While neoconservatives have generally opposed the Israeli Labor Party as too soft on Israel’s Arab enemies, it has also scolded Likud premiers Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert when they have not met neoconservative standards of being tough enough with the Palestinians or with Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Sharon’s lasting legacy: Proving that rabbis and settlers can be defied In the disengagement from Gaza, Sharon – no great democrat – proved that democracy and Zionism are stronger than any rabbinical edict.
Police to probe expressions of joy at Sharon’s death ‘Mazal tov’ notices posted to yeshiva bulletin boards are ‘contemptible,’ says public security minister
Was Ariel Sharon cursed? Previous to Sharon’s stroke on January 4, 2006, he was the target of various kabbalistic curses and holy warnings.
Ynetnews – ‘We prayed for Sharon’s death’ Right-wing activists claim they had held a ‘Pulsa Dinura’ (curse) that called for the prime minister’s demise 10 years after they had put the same curse on slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin
KABALISTS INVOKE DEATH CURSE ON SHARON Far right rabbis repeat ceremony that foreshadowed killing of Rabin
When Sharon still was in office, vibrant and in command of his faculties, a venerated rabbi predicted the Messiah would not come until after Sharon’s death.Rabbi Yitzhak Kaduri died shortly after the stroke Sharon suffered put him in a coma in 2006. But before the beloved Kaduri died, he wrote a cryptic note in which he named the Messiah with whom he claimed to have had a mystical encounter. On the 108-year-old rabbi’s instructions, the note would be released a year after his death.
Ariel Sharon’s disease caused with ancient Kaballistic curse A group of twenty men gathered at a cemetery of the Israeli town of Rosh Pina on a quiet night of July 23, 2005
Israeli campaign: Ariel Sharon’s stroke was ‘curse of Gaza disengagement’ Extreme right-wing religious party, Eretz Yisrael Shelanu, launching campaign, saying they seek to warn current government against evacuating settlements.
Bennett receives death curse over non-Haredi policies Jewish Home leader calls in cops over missive warning that ‘Pulsa Dinura’ ritual has invoked divine retribution against him
SHARON « TRAVAILLAIT POUR AMALEK »!
Not surprisingly, the young father–a goat farmer–found occasion, when he rose to speak, to raise the (to him) timely subject of Amalek. « I am looking at our life today, and what Amalek wants to do is swallow up the people of Israel, » he said. Then, using an image that had been first developed in the Zohar, he added: « This is the snake. This is the snake »–although « serpent » would arguably have been a better translation, since the Zoharic allusion is to the sly and slithering creature in the book of Genesis. Goldberg then turned to a young acquaintance seated next to him, Ayelet, a pregnant (married) teenager who wore a long skirt and carried a semiautomatic M-16, and asked her whether she thought Amalek was alive today. « Of course, » she replied, and pointed toward one of the Arab villages in the distance. « The Amalekite spirit is everywhere, » she added, « it’s not just the Arabs. » When asked by Goldberg who else might be part of Amalek, she replied, « Sharon isn’t Amalek, but he works for Amalek. » (…)
On the East Coast not long afterward members of the Jewish Defense League in Brooklyn decided, on Purim of 1977, to burn in effigy another person who had ascended to the highest corridors of power under Richard Nixon–their coreligionist Henry Kissinger!17 This, however, was not as paradoxical as might appear, for as we have already seen, it had long been claimed that Jews too could be Amalekites.
60 Minutes, 9-11 skeptics, Africa and Africans, African-Americans, Alan Rickman, Albert Einstein, Albert S. Lindemann, Alexander Cockburn, American Conservative, American founding fathers, American Free Press, American Friends Service Committee, American media, Amnesty International, Amos Oz, Ancient Greece, Andrew Young, Anglican Church, Anglo-American establishment, Anthony Lewis, Antiwar.com, Arab Nationalism, Arab Nationalists, Arabs, Argentina and Argentines, Ariel Sharon, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Arnold Toynbee, Arthur Miller, Australia and the Australians, Austria and the Austrians, Babylon and the Babylonians, Barry Chamish, BBC (British Broadcasting Co.), Bible, Bill Clinton, Bill Moyers, Bill O’Reilly, Billy Graham, Black nationalism, Black nationalists, Bo Gritz, Bobby Fischer, Bobby Ray, Inman Boston, Globe, Brandeis University, British Labor Party, Bryant Gumbel, Bush ’41 administration, Bush family, Carl Jung, Carter administration, Caspar Weinberger, Cato Institute, Celine, Centre for Research on Globalization, Charles Dickens, Charles Lindbergh, Charley Reese, Chris Matthews, Christian conservatives, Christian liberals, Christian Science Monitor, Christian Zionism, Christian Zionists, Christiana Amanpour, Christiane Amanpour, Christianity and Christians, Christopher Hitchens, Christopher Lydon, Christopher Marlowe, CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), Cicero, Cindy Sheehan, CNN, Colin Powell, Communism and Communists, Condoleezza Rice, Conservatives, Cornel West, Counterpunch, CPB (Corp. for Public Broadcasting), Critics of ADL spying on Americans, Critics of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), Critics of AIPAC spying on Americans, Critics of Ariel Sharon, Critics of Greater Israel, Critics of Israeli settlements, Critics of Jewish fundamentalism, Critics of Jewish terrorism, Critics of Jonathan Pollard, Critics of Judaism, Critics of the Likud Party, Critics of Menachem Begin, Critics of neoconservatism and Neoconservatives(!), Critics of neoliberalism, Critics of Orthodox Judaism, Critics of Reform Judaism, Critics of the ADL (Anti- Defamation League), Critics of the Iraq War, Critics of the Israeli government, Critics of Yitzhak Shamir, Critics of Zionism, Cynthia McKinney, Cyrus Vance, D.H. Lawrence, D.W. Griffith, Daniel Barenboim, Daniel Kurtzer, David Duke, David Icke, David Irving, David Rockefeller, David Shipler, Democratic Party and Democrats, Doug Ireland, Dwight Eisenhower, Eastern Europe and Eastern Europeans, Edward Gibbon, Edward S. Herman, Edward Said, Egypt and the Egyptians, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, England and the English, Enlightenment intellectuals, Eric Margolis, Ernest Hemingway, EU (European Union), Europe and the Europeans, European media, European nationalism and European nationalists, Ezra Pound, FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), Fox News, France and the French, Francis Fukuyama, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Frederick Law Olmsted, French nationalism, French nationalists, Fyodor Dostoevsky, G. K. Chesterton, Gary Hart, Gary Leup, Geoffrey Wheatcroft, George Ball, George Bernard Shaw, George Carlin, George Galloway, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, German nationalism, German nationalists, Germany and the Germans, Gerry Adams, Gilad Atzmon, God(!), Goethe, Gore Vidal, Goyim — all non-Jews, Grace Halsell, Greece and the Greeks, Greek Orthodox church, H.G. Wells, H.L. Mencken, Hannah Arendt, Harold Pinter, Harry Belafonte, Harry Browne, Harry Truman, Harvard University, Hasidic Jews, Hellenism and Hellenists, Hellenized Jews, Henry Adams, Henry Ford, Henry Siegman, Hilaire Belloc, Hillary Clinton, Holocaust skeptics, Howard Dean, Hugo Chavez, Human Rights Watch, Hungary and the Hungarians, Internet, IRA (Irish Republican Army), Iran and the Iranians, Iraq and the Iraqis, Ireland and the Irish, Islam and Muslims, Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir, J. Orlin Grabbe, J. William Fulbright, Jack London, James Angleton(!), James Baker, James Bamford, James Ennes, James Forrestal, James Norman, James Traficant, James Webb, James Wolcott, James Wolfensohn, Japan and the Japanese, Jeff Rense, Jerry Falwell, Jesse Helms, Jesse Jackson, Jesus Christ, Jewish anti-Zionists, Jewish Communists, Jewish conservatives, Jewish converts to Christianity, Jewish converts to Islam, Jewish liberals, Jewish prophets, Jewish secularists, Jewish socialists, Jews for Jesus, Jim Robinso, Jimmy Carter, Joan Baez, Jodie Foster, Joel Bainerman, John F. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy Jr., John Grisha, John Gunther Dean, John Kreidl, John Le Carre, John Lennon, John Mearsheimer, John Nash, John Sununu, Joerg Haider, Joseph Campbell, Joseph Kennedy, Joseph Sobran, Joseph Stalin, Joseph Wilson, Judah Magnes, Judaism, Jude Wanniski, Juergen Moellemann, Justin Raimondo, Karl Marx, Kate Smith, Kathleen Christison, Ken Livingstone, Kennedy administration, Kennedy family, Kevin MacDonald, Kofi Annan, Kurt Nimmo, Labor Party (Israel), Larry David, Lee Hockstader, Leon T. Hadar, Lew Rockwell, LewRockwell.com, Liberalism and liberals, Libertarianism and libertarians, Libya and the Libyans, Likud Party (Israel), Louis Farrakhan, Lubavitcher Jews, Lutherans, Lyndon LaRouche, Mahathir Mohamad, Mahatma Gandhi, Malaysia and the Malaysians, Malcolm X, Mark Bruzonsky, Mark Twain, Marlon Brando, Martin Heiddeger, Martin Kilson, Martin Luther, Marxism and Marxists, Mary Robinson, Maureen Dowd, Meir Kahane, Mel Gibson, Michael Collins Piper, Michael Jackson, Michael Lerner, Michael Lind, Michael Rivero, Michael Scheuer, Michel Chossudovsky, Mike Wallace, Mohammed, Monty Python, Moshe Menuhin, Napoleon Bonaparte, Neoconservative apostates, Neoliberals, New Testament, New York Review of Books, New York Times, New Zealand & New Zealanders, Nixon administration, Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, Norway and the Norwegians, NPR (National Public Radio), Oil industry and oil lobby, Old Testament, Orthodox Judaism, Orthodox Jews, Oswald Spengler, paganism and pagans, Pakistan and the Pakistanis, Palestinian nationalism and Palestinian nationalists, Palestinians, Pat Robertson, Patrick Buchanan, Patrick Fitzgerald, Patrick Lang, Paul Craig Roberts, Paul de Man, Paul Findley, Paul Gottfried, Paul Wellstone, PBS (Public Broadcasting Svc.), Pete Seeger, Peter Jennings, Peter Sellars, Phil Donahue, Phil Ochs, Philip Roth, Philip Weiss, Pink Floyd, Poland and the Poles, Presbyterians, Protestantism and Protestants, Public Enemy, Rachel Corrie, Rainer, Werner Fassbinder, Ralph Nader, Ramsey Clark, Ray McGovern, Reagan administration, Red Cross, Reform Judaism, Reform Jews, Religious Jews, Rense.com, Republican Party and Republicans, Richard Curtiss, Richard Nixon, Richard Wagner, Roald Dahl, Robert Fisk, Robert Frost, Robert I. Friedman, Robert Novak, Robert Redford, Rodney Stark, Roman Catholic Church and Roman Catholics, Rome and the Romans, Ronald Reagan, Roosevelt administration, Rumania and the Rumanians, Rupert Murdoch, Russia and the Russians, Saddam Hussein, Satmar Jews, Saudi Arabia and the Saudis, Scott McConnell, Scott Ritter, secular Jews, Self-hating Jews, Seymour Hersh, Sheldon Richman, Sherman Skolnick, Shimon Peres, Sidney Hook, Sinn Fein, Soviet Union, Spinoza, Spiro Agnew, St. Thomas Aquinas, State Department, Stephen Walt, Steven Spielberg, Strobe Talbott, Syria and the Syrians, T.S. Eliot, Tacitus, Ted Turner, The Nation, The Village Voice, The World, Theodore Dreiser, Thomas Edison, Thomas Friedman, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Tikkun, Tim Burton, Tim LaHaye, Tim Wise, Tom Segev, Tony Blair, Truman Capote, Turkey and the Turks, U.S. Defense Department, U.S. State Department, Ukraine and the Ukrainians, Ultra-Orthodox Jews, Ulysses S. Grant, UN (United Nations), UNESCO, UNICEF, United States and Americans, Uri Avnery, USS Liberty survivors, Vanessa Redgrave, Venezuela and the Venezuelans, Victor Ostrovsky, Vladimir Putin, Voltaire, Walt Disney, Washington Post, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Wayne Madsen, WCC (World Council of Churches), Western Europe and Western Europeans, What Really Happened.com, White nationalism, White nationalists, William Pierce, William Shakespeare, Willis Carto, Winston Churchill, Woody Allen, Yehoshafat Harkabi, Yitzhak Rabin, Yossi Sarid, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Zionism and Zionists
Sur ce blog: