« Rothschild du Nouveau Monde »: gibier de potence talmudiste, Edgar Bronfman Sr. en enfer. Son rôle dans la guerre en Irak et quelques autres de ses crimes moins connus

Le clan Bronfman n’est pas seulement responsable 
  • de servir les intérêts Rothschild et de leur devoir, à eux et aux Oppenheimer, son prestige et sa fortune,
  • d’avoir fait sa fortune dans le trafic d’alcool durant la prohibition
  • d’avoir évité, par des moyens détournés comme des lois spéciales, de payer des impôts,
  • de régner comme parrain de la pègre nord-américaine, parrain d’Al Capone (lié à Meyer Lansky) et de John McCain,
  • d’avoir tout fait, à travers son Congrès juif, pour déclencher et susciter l’appui populaire pour la guerre contre les nazis, 
  • de la production d’Anthrax par les Alliés en vue d’exterminer des millions de jeunes allemands,  et ce pendant que les nazis n’avaient ni armes chimiques/bactériologique ni aucune autre arme de destruction massive,
  • d’avoir financé et parrainé, en collaboration avec la pègre de Lansky, la création de l’État d’Israël et son armement, incluant son arsenal nucléaire, 
  • d’avoir fait exécuter John F. Kennedy qui menaçait l’arsenal nucléaire israélien, 
  • d’avoir financé l’empire médiatique de Rupert Murdoch, agent pro-Israël des Rothschild,
  • d’avoir extorqué des milliards aux banques suisses pour les prétendus comptes juifs en déshérence,
  • d’avoir combattu l’Indépendance du Québec avec ses « minutes du Patrimoine » et en détruisant la carrière politique d’Yves Michaud par l’intermédiaire de son homme de main Leo Kolber,
  • d’avoir financé la récupération de la Scientologie (et de ses techniques) par des avocats juifs liés au Mossad pour s’en servir, en collaboration avec l’ADL et la CIA, pour infiltrer, subvertir et détruire des organisations nationalistes  et révisionnistes… et même de médecine holistique.

Non seulement cela, mais en plus, l’homme de main de Bronfman à Seagram’s et au Congrès juif mondial, Stephen HERBITS, est responsable d’avoir littéralement purgé les hauts rangs de l’armée américaine qui étaient fermement opposés à l’entrée en guerre contre l’Irak de Saddam Hussein (ces généraux sachant pertinemment que cela ne servirait que les intérêts israéliens).
Perhaps the most telling attack on the generals came from Stephen Herbits, a former top executive of the Seagram liquor empire, the fiefdom of World Jewish Congress chief Edgar Bronfman, a major patron of Israel. This longtime Bronfman henchman was appointed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to make « heads roll » in the military, screening all Pentagon promotions and appointments, implementing the agenda of enforcing lockstep Zionist control of the American war machine. 
Writing in the April 2, 2006 edition of the egregiously pro-Israel Washington Times, Herbits urged the media to start to investigate military leaders who dared to take on the administration. Herbits said it would be « a service to this country when the media digs a bit below these attacks to examine the generals. »  
Herbits was obviously calling on spy agencies such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a conduit for Israel’s Mossad, to come up with « data » on the military men and provide it to the media to bring the dissidents into line. 
Incidentally, because Herbits was openly gay and a long-time public advocate for the cause of homosexual rights, there are those who believe that the very reason Herbits had been drafted by the Bush administration to institute so-called « reform » at the Pentagon was so that military figures who opposed Herbits‘ intrigues at the Pentagon on behalf of the Zionist apparatus would be less likely to criticize the Bronfman family henchman for fear of being accused of anti-gay bias in the event they did dare to challenge Herbits primary agenda: rooting out perceived enemies of Israel inside the American military elite. And it is worth noting that after Herbits ultimately left the Bush administration, he returned to the Bronfman fold, taking on the post of secretary-general of the World Jewish Congress, demonstrating where Herhits’ primary political sympathies lie.
(Michael Collins Piper, « Revolt of the Generals: America’s Military Elite Take a Stand Against Israel’s American Partisans », in THE GOLEM, Chapter Fifteen)

Stephen Herbits, Israel Singer, Edgar Bronfman

Qui est Stephen E. Herbits?
The most significant move Bronfman made is to appoint Seagram’s former executive vice president for external affairs, Stephen E. Herbits, as transition manager. Herbits will direct the WJC’s administrative affairs until the new constitution is fully implemented.
In the memorandum, Bronfman recounts Herbits‘ ample experience in transition management, based on his work as a consultant to the United States Department of Defense, where he helped manage the transition in 2001 from the Clinton administration to Bush’s.
Stephen Herbits wasn’t surprised to hear his old friend Donald Rumsfeld on the other end of the phone line. The newly appointed secretary of Defense was calling in January 2001 to enlist Herbits in a familiar role: overseeing Pentagon hiring in the Bush administration. It was a task that Herbits, who has known Rumsfeld for more than 30 years, has performed for every Republican president since Richard Nixon.

He noted also that Herbits, described by Bronfman as his “right-hand man” at Seagrams, the Bronfman family company, is less than objective about the matter. Herbits, whose professional record includes stints as adviser to three U.S. Defense Department heads, has insisted that his work will speak for his integrity.

A former top adviser to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Bronfman’s right-hand man at Seagram, Herbits was brought into the WJC three years ago to clean up things amid charges of mismanagement.


Michael Collins Piper écrit dans The High Priests of War (2004): 

« Notably, one American Jewish writer summed up the Zionist dreams guiding the Bush policy, particularly vis-à-vis Iraq, for Time magazine, a publication that is controlled by Jewish financial interests revolving around the powerful family of Edgar Bronfman, longtime head of the World Jewish Congress. In an essay entitled “How Israel is Wrapped Up in Iraq,” Time columnist Joe Klein wrote with candor: 

A stronger Israel is very much embedded in the rationale for war with Iraq.  It is a part of the argument that dare not speak its name, a fantasy quietly cherished by the neo-conservative faction in the Bush Administration and by many leaders of the American Jewish community.
The fantasy involves a domino theory. The destruction of Saddam’s Iraq will not only remove an enemy of long-standing but will also change the basic power equation in the region. It will send a message to Syria and Iran about the perils of support for Islamic terrorists. 
It will send a message to the Palestinians too: Democratize and make peace on Israeli terms, or forget about a state of your own. In the wackiest scenario, it will lead to the collapse of the wobbly Hashemite monarchy in Jordan and the establishment of a Palestinian state on that nation’s East Bank. 
No one in the government ever actually says these things publicly (although some American Jewish leaders do). Usually, the dream is expressed in the mildest possible terms: “I have high hopes that the removal of Saddam will strengthen our democratic allies in the region,” Senator Joe Lieberman told me last week. (Time.com 5 Feb 2003)

Bronfman’s War on the U.S. Military

Alongtime Bronfman henchman at Seagrams, Stephen Herbits, was recruited by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to make “heads roll” in the military, screening Pentagon promotions and appointments, enforcing Zionist control of the U.S. war machine.
This move on the military came in 2006 when top retired American military leaders publicly slammed the Bush administration for waging war against Iraq, making it clear they spoke formany colleagues still in the Pentagon who opposed the war from the start.
Herbits urged the media to investigate military leaders who dared to take on the administration. Saying it would be “a service to this country when the media digs a bit below these attacks to examine the generals,” Herbits was sending a warning: Military leaders who stood up against civilian warmongers promoting the interests of Israel were subject to investigation by spy agencies such as the Anti-Defamation League which could come up with “data” on the dissidents to destroy them.
After doing his dirty work, Herbits returned to the Bronfman fold, serving as secretary-general of the World Jewish Congress and thus Bronfman’s subservient minion. (Michael Collins Piper, for American Free Press)

Murder Discussed at High-Level Bronfman Meeting

In 2005 New York magazine noted Edgar Bronfman “belongs to one of the world’s most exclusive clubs, an impossibly elite gathering known as the ‘Mega Group.’ It consists of about a dozen inconceivably rich Jews who get together several times a year, often in either Bronfman’s or [CBS owner] Larry Tisch’s apartment. . . .”
In 1990, an unexpected source advised Andrew St. George—chief correspondent for The Spotlight (forerunner of AFP)—there had been a high-level meeting at Bronfman’s New York apartment attended by top financial patrons and leaders of the Zionist movement. (This was the “Mega Group” although its name was not then known.) Devoted to combating the purported “rise of anti-Semitism,” the meeting’s participants included financier Felix G. Rohatyn and Jacques Torczyner, president of the Zionist Organization of America.
Andrew’s source told him Torczyner said, in words to these effect: “It’s time that we put a stop to Willis Carto and his newspaper, The Spotlight.” Torczyner said specifically that Carto and his associates should be “hunted and shot like quail.”
Torczyner’s candor disturbed at least some of his fellow power brokers who responded, “We can’t use the tactics of our enemies.”
In fact, it was the aforementioned Rohatyn who told St. George about the meeting. A longtime newsman, St. George knew many people, Rohatyn among them.
St. George took the story to Carto and Mark Lane, The Spotlight’s anti-Zionist Jewish attorney, who wrote a letter to Torczyner warning him against making further threats. Still, a continuing campaign to destroy The Spotlight culminated with the populist weekly driven out of business in 2001. Thank goodness, AFP picked up The Spotlight’s fallen torch.
Carto had reason to be concerned: Bronfman fingerprints were all over the JFK assassination conspiracy. For the tip of that iceberg, read “Rothschild-Israeli Ties to JFK” in the December 9 &16, 2013 issue of AFP. (Michael Collins Piper, for American Free Press)

L’ex-président du Congrès juif mondial Edgar Bronfman est mort

(…)Président du CJM entre 1981 et 2007, Edgar Bronfman avait activement participé aux efforts pour contraindre les banques suisses à restituer plus d’un milliard de dollars aux familles des victimes des camps de la mort qui avaient placé leurs capitaux en Suisse avant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, rappelle The New York Times.
Menace de « guerre totale »

Les déclarations qu’Edgar Bronfman avait faites dans une interview en mars 1998 avaient provoqué l’indignation en Suisse. Il avait alors réclamé trois milliards de dollars pour régler la question des fonds en déshérence et menacé les banques helvétiques de « guerre totale » si elles n’obtempéraient pas.
Le Congrès juif mondial en bref
(…)Créé pour lutter contre la menace du nazisme, il est basé sur l’idée que le destin du peuple juif est unitaire.


Death of the Liquor King:
The life, times and misdeeds
of Edgar Bronfman Sr.

A devout Talmudic Jew, Edgar Bronfman bankrolled
many Zionist causes over the years with the billions of
dollars he made hawking Canadian booze.

• Edgar Bronfman—one of the world’s most powerful Zionists—finally dies
By Michael Collins Piper
The patriarch of a crime syndicate-connected empire that has operated in the sphere of the Rothschild dynasty is dead. On Dec. 22, Edgar M. Bronfman—longtime head of the World Jewish Congress—died at age 84. New York magazine once described him as a “sometimes coarse, bullying businessman” but noted “there are some people who would simply call him king of the Jews.”
Rabbi Mishael Zion has hailed Bronfman as “a modern Talmudic Jew,” noting Bronfman’s favorite book was the Babylonian Talmud, the hero of which, the rabbi admitted, is not God but the “cunning human scholar.” Praising Bronfman’s work funding scholarships for Jewish youth, the rabbi said Bronfman was “the person who invited us to live Talmudically in the modern world.”
This recalls Meyer Rothschild, founder of the dynasty with whom Bronfman’s family has had a long association. An admiring biographer once said Rothschild was “a zealous believer in the Talmud and chose it alone as the guiding principle of all his actions.”
It is thus fitting that Bronfman biographer Peter C. Newman said the Bronfmans were “the Rothschilds of the New World,” estimating in 1978 that Bronfman assets totaled some $7 billion. In fact, Edgar Bronfman had a level of clout few could claim, precisely because of his front-line positioning in the Zionist movement and his family’s pivotal historic role in the crime syndicate.
Edgar was son of Sam Bronfman who immigrated to Canada from Russia and made his fortune in liquor, gambling, prostitution and drugs. Going “legitimate” when he assumed control of the Montreal-based Seagram distillery, Sam forged links with the New York crime syndicate headed by another Russian Jew, Meyer Lansky, and during Prohibition supplied—and thus controlled—the “spigot” of liquor funneled into the U.S. and distributed by the Lansky mob.
In many border towns in the northern U.S there are family fortunes accumulated by locals who were part of the Bronfman network. And in the big cities, a connection with this syndicate was a “must.” In Detroit, the “little Jewish navy” of Morris Dalitz—later Lansky’s top man in Las Vegas—ferried Bronfman booze into the U.S.
Even Chicago’s celebrated Italian-American gangster, Al Capone, owed his rise to his own Bronfman connection. It was Lansky who sent Capone to Chicago from New York in the first place, assigned to work for Johnny Torrio (Bronfman’s Chicago contact) who was moving to unseat “Big Jim” Colosimo as Italian-American Mafia chief in the Windy City.
Colosimo had alienated Lansky and Bronfman—whom he called “dirty Jews”—by asserting there was “no future in bootlegging,” showing little interest in patronizing Bronfman liquor, preferring to focus on drugs, prostitution and loan-sharking.
So a Jewish hitman from New York “retired” Big Jim and soon enough, Bronfman liquor flowed into Chicago. The media lionized Capone, but the Chicago mob, thenceforward, was dominated by behind-the-scenes Jewish bosses.
In any case, Bronfman plowed his ill-gotten gains into legitimate enterprises, establishing his family as major patrons of Israel and expanding their power on American shores.
When Sam died, Edgar assumed family leadership and—though little known to the public—was one of the most powerful figures on the planet.
Today, his legacy lives on.
Aside from wheeler-dealer son, Edgar Jr., son Matthew chairs the board of the World Jewish Congress and is a controlling shareholder of one of Israel’s largest banks, Israel Discount Bank, and other Israeli enterprises. Son Adam directs a family foundation and lives off family wealth. Daughter Holly—interestingly—shares the same high-powered Texas lawyer as media icon Alex Jones.
Bronfman bankrolled Mort Zuckerman, now a billionaire, who in turn bankrolled Dan Snyder, now billionaire owner of the Washington Redskins football team. They, too, are Bronfman heirs in their own respect.

Edgar Bronfman meets with Israelʼs Ariel Sharon.

Bronfman’s Empire

Bronfman holdings have been immense, including such famed companies as Campbell Soup, Schlitz Brewing, Colgate-Palmolive, Kellog, Nabisco, Norton Simon, Quaker Oats, Paramount Pictures, Kodiak boots and Hush Puppies shoes.
The Bronfmans held an interest in the Ernest W. Hahn Co. (which operated 27 shopping centers in California and had plans for another 29) and the Trizec Corp., one of North America’s biggest property development companies.
They controlled the Shannon Mall in Atlanta and the Galleria in Westchester, N.Y. and a shopping center in Hickory, N.C. Bronfman controlled industrial parks in and near Los Angeles, office towers in Denver and San Francisco, and housing developments in Nevada, California and Florida, as well as Houston-based General Homes Consolidated, building houses in Mississippi and Alabama.
And they owned vast tracts of land in Virginia outside Washington, D.C.
And although the famous “Du Pont” name appeared on company products, the real power behind the scenes was Bronfman who—not content with owning 20% of the distinguished institution—took complete control in 1981, ultimately divesting his holdings.

Bronfman’s Stranglehold on the Media

It was inevitable Bronfman’s Seagram Co. would purchase a controlling interest in Time-Warner in 1993. Mob-connected Bronfman associates had already moved on this media empire, going back to a 1967 merger between Warner Brothers Studios and Seven Arts Productions, run by a frontman for Bronfman partner Meyer Lansky. The new operation—soon merged with Time publishing—became Time-Warner.
A sampling of holdings in the Time Warner octopus over the years: 

  • Time-Life Video; HBO Video; Warner Home Video; 
  • Cable franchises reaching 11.7 million subscribers; 
  • Turner Broadcasting, including all CNN holdings; 
  • Magazines: Time, People, Sports Illustrated, Life, Fortune, Money, Vibe, In Style, Parenting, Martha Stewart Living, Sunset, Health, Entertainment Weekly, Cooking Light, Southern Living, DC Comics and American Lawyer
  • Book publishing: Little, Brown and Co., Time-Life Books, Warner Books, Book-of-the-Month Club.

Edgar Bronfman Jr. operated Seagram as his personal plaything after Seagram bought Hollywood giant, MCA, bringing MCA subsidiaries—Universal Studios and Universal Music—and TV channels in Europe and Latin America into Bronfman hands.
Last but far from least: With the Rothschilds, the Oppenheimers of South Africa and the late Armand Hammer, Bronfman money bankrolled the move into the United States by Australian media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, now a major influence over the American “conservative” movement.

Cindy and John McCain.

Bronfman’s Connections to John McCain

The Bronfmans were the “godfathers” behind the career of Arizona Sen. John McCain (R), Israel’s most outspoken advocate in Congress. McCain’s $150 million fortune comes from his marriage to Cindy Hensley who inherited one of the nation’s largest beer distribution companies fromher father, Jim Hensley.
Hensley made his money as a henchman of Kemper Marley who, for 40 years, was political boss of Arizona and the Lansky syndicate’s front man in the Gem State. The Bronfmans set Marley up in business and after Hensley took the rap for Marley in a criminal case, Hensley’s reward was the beer business now in McCain family hands.

La fille d’Edgar Bronfman Sr, Sara Bronfman est l’épouse d’un candidat présidentiel en Lybie post-Kadhafi…

Sara Bronfman, humanitarian and human rights activist (born 1976) is the daughter of the billionaire philanthropist and former Seagram chairman, Edgar Bronfman Sr.(…)
Work in Libya
Sara Bronfman first became involved in aiding Libya after traveling as a delegate with the The Independent Libya Foundation (ILF) in November 2011, during the Arab Spring and after the death of Muammar Gaddafi. (…)
Sara Bronfman is also involved with the Canada-Libya Chamber of Commerce, which was founded on March 12, 2012. Bronfman and fiance Basit Igtet are the inaugural president and chairman of the board respectively. Positioned to provide help and advice to the people of Libya, the Chamber of Commerce discourage continued business with groups such as SNC-Lavalin, who allegedly did business with the Gadaffi regime.[5] The group is one of several working to restore the economy in the region.
Abdul Basit Igtet To Stand For The Presidency Of Libya TRIPOLI, Libya, April 9, 2014 /PRnewswire– Abdul Basit Igtet, the businessman and author of « A Plan for Libya », confirmed today that he will stand for the post of President of Libya.  Mr. Igtet commented:  « My main objective is that the Libyan people should build their future on the firm foundations of a well-functioning and prosperous country. I have come to the conclusion that the best way for me to bring that about is to stand as President once the new constitution is in place – when the Libyan people will have the opportunity to make a democratic choice.  I believe firmly that the new President should be President of all the country – and not just Tripoli.  I will therefore shortly be opening offices in five key towns outside the capital, to be able to listen and respond to all our people.  I know already how much Libyans are concerned about security, and about basic services such as housing and roads and schools and hospitals.  But the problems in one town are different from the problems in another.  So, starting in two weeks time, I intend to travel round our country and learn about the views of the local people. I will take my professional team with me. They will listen and adapt our policy plans to immediate needs.  To the people of Libya, I say – our priorities have to become your priorities, that is real democracy. My Presidency will be your Presidency. Your President for your Libya. »

Basit Igtet et le va-t-en guerre sioniste juif Joe Lieberman
Can A Business Entrepreneur Save Libya? By Carrie Sheffield for FORBES A Benghazi native, Igtet fled the country as a political exile, finding refuge in Switzerland, where he became a successful businessman. He recently enlisted the law firm of foreign policy heavyweight former Sen. Joe Lieberman in a deal likely to broker him meetings with Obama administration officials and members of Congress. Lieberman’s office did not return requests for comment.

La liste des crimes des talmudistes Bronfman est interminable, mais voici quand même un bref aperçu, accompagné de liens vers des sources pertinentes:

Le jeu des devinettes: qu’ont en commun Al Capone et la contrebande d’alcool durant la prohibition, Meyer Lansky et l’armement de tsahal, Jack Ruby et l’assassinat de JFK, la production d’anthrax à Grosse-Ile au Québec et la Seconde guerre mondiale, John McCain et Rupert Murdoch, la guerre contre le nationalisme québecois et le nouveau chef des finances du parti Libéral canadien?

Bronfman firm and Caisse to invest in Israel
Bronfman responsable des investissements en Israël de la Caisse de dépôt et placement, avec l’argent des petits épargnants québécois. Rappelons que la Caisse de dépôt est la cible de bandits internationaux: sous la responsabilité de Henri-Paul Rousseau, lié au clan Desmarais, la Caisse a perdu plus de 50 milliards de dollars qui appartenaient aux petits épargnants québécois. Rousseau n’a fait face à aucun acusation, il est même retourné sur le planel de direction de Power Corp, du clan Desmarais.

Ne les oublions pas: Les « idiots utiles » de la guerre en Irak 
Mardi 17 Juin 201
Régis Soubrouillard – Marianne

En 2003, quelques intellos soixante-huitards dénonçaient la France « soviétique » incapable de s’aligner sur les Etats-Unis pour aller combattre en Irak aux côtés des « boys » de George W. Bush. A l’époque Goupil, Glucksmann et Bruckner voyaient « Bagdad danser ». Retour sur la joute intellectuelle initiée par ces gauchistes convertis au bushisme alors que l’Irak sombre aujourd’hui dans un chaos peu dansant…
«Que Saddam parte, de gré ou de force ! Les Irakiens, Kurdes, chiites mais aussi bien sunnites respireront plus librement et les peuples de la région en seront soulagés » clamaient dans les pages du Monde, les philosophes Philippe Glucksmann et Pascal Bruckner ainsi que le réalisateur Romain Goupil dans une tribune sobrement intitulée « La faute ».
Sûrs de leurs certitudes, en avril 2003, nos trois soixante-huitards enchaînaient les prises de parole pour soutenir l’intervention américaine en Irak et n’avaient pas de mots assez durs pour dénoncer « l’antiaméricanisme français ». L’argumentaire des copains de barricade, condamnés à expier ad vitam leur « égarement » de jeunesse, virait même au délire quand on relit leur tribune onze ans plus tard. En plus de « protéger Saddam » — pas moins ! —, la France était devenue rouge, d’un rouge soviétique. Et l’histoire, cruelle, n’oublierait pas cet aveuglement idéologique des français : « Il faudra raconter un jour l’hystérie, l’intoxication collective qui ont frappé l’Hexagone depuis des mois, l’angoisse de l’Apocalypse qui a saisi nos meilleurs esprits, l’ambiance quasi soviétique qui a soudé 90 % de la population dans le triomphe d’une pensée monolithique, allergique à la moindre contestation », écrivait Glucksmann, Goupil et Bruckner. 
Bizarrement, à l’époque, l’interventionniste BHL n’avait pas rejoint la troupe. C’est plus tard que le philosophe deviendra un inébranlable va-t-en guerre. A l’époque, Bernard-Henri se tâte encore, changeant de discours en fonction du public comme le relèveront les auteurs du livre Le nouveau B.A.BA du BHL. En France, BHL est donc contre la guerre en Irak, même s’il la trouve « plutôt juste du point de vue de la morale ». Lorsque le philosophe s’exprime aux Etats-Unis, son propos est beaucoup plus nuancé : « J’étais opposé à l’administration Bush quand elle a décidé d’entrer en guerre contre l’Irak. Mais aujourd’hui, nous y sommes, nous devons désormais finir le travail » 
Mais revenons à nos « moutons » atlantistes. Pour eux, la France s’était donc « mise hors jeu », « ridiculisée » quand Tony Blair s’était révélé un « véritable chef d’Etat ». La plupart des partis politiques français avaient succombé à un « nationalisme des imbéciles ». Selon eux, Marianne avait d’ailleurs tout faux. Alors que Bagdad goûtait « ses premières heures de délivrance », l’hebdomadaire titrait, en effet, « La catastrophe ». Inadmissible pour nos valeureux combattants accablés devant le constat qu’il existe encore dans nos démocraties « une portion importante de citoyens que la chute d’une dictature désespère », basculant dans un lyrisme euphorique qui parait glaçant aujourd’hui: « Quand Bagdad danse, Paris fait grise mine ». 
Le meilleur du pire des mondes

En fait, nos trois joyeux lurons de l’Axe du Bien étaient ni plus ni moins que des résistants à une pensée obligatoire. Du moins le croyaient-ils. 

Quelques années plus tard rejoints par Stéphane Courtois, auteur du Livre noir du Communisme, Alexandre Adler, Pierre André Taguieff et bien d’autres, tous nos bushistes convertis, convaincus de la nécessité de poursuivre leur combat se retrouveront même pour créer une revue « Le Meilleur des mondes ».

La revue développera une vision binaire du monde partagé entre « amis » et « ennemis » de l’Amérique, « pro-Américains » et « anti-Américains ». En 2008, certains feront néanmoins volte-face, consacrant un édito dans la revue au… fiasco irakien : « Nous nous sommes en effet retrouvés piégés par le caractère très idéologique du débat franco-français. Nous n’avons pas assez prêté l’oreille à ceux d’entre nous qui, au milieu du vacarme antiaméricain, s’inquiétaient de l’absence de vrais projets politiques pour l’après-guerre. Hantés par le passé, nous avons vu l’Amérique de 2003 avec les lunettes de 1944. Or, George Bush n’est pas Franklin D. Roosevelt. Aveuglé par le 11 Septembre, ignorant des réalités du monde, le président américain a conduit son pays et le peuple irakien au désastre »

En 2014, force est de constater que la progression de l’EIIL (l’Etat islamique en Irak et au levant), ne fait que révéler les failles de l’Etat irakien laissé en place par les Américains à leur départ. Le risque désormais, en cas d’entrée de l’EIIL dans Bagdad, est bel et bien celui d’une guerre civile qui pourrait se révéler extrêmement sanglante, bien loin des promesses de respiration et de soulagement formulées, pour la population locale, par nos têtes pensantes.

Quelle importance après tout. Privée de son ennemi communiste, voulant illusoirement « faire la guerre au terrorisme », l’Amérique a laissé venir à elle tous les « idiots utiles » susceptibles de porter sa bonne parole pour alimenter une paranoïa apocalyptique. Même si, sur le terrain, tout a échoué. Ou comme le disait alors Philippe Muray « même si, en somme, le monde extérieur persiste à ne pas ressembler à celui des gameboys militaro-mystiques de Washington ».


This entry was posted in Non classé. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.