Michael Collins Piper fut l’un des auteurs antijuifs les plus prolifiques. En plus de ses milliers d’articles et ses nombreux feuillets, on lui doit une douzaine d’ouvrages, dont le classique Final Judgment qui a résolu une fois pour toute l’énigme de l’assassinat de JFK par Israël. Il avait une émission de radio internet depuis 2006, d’abord sur les ondes de RBN et par la suite sur le site web The Ugly Truth de Mark Glenn.
Peu de temps avant de mourir, dans une de ses dernières émissions (disponibles ici gratuitement), Piper se disait sûr de ne plus en avoir pour longtemps, non seulement à cause de ses problèmes de santé importants, mais surtout à cause de ses révélations, révélations qu’il pouvait enfin livrer crûment au public, puisque depuis sa perte d’emploi il pouvait enfin dire toute la vérité sur les affaires louches et criminelles de ses anciens employeurs Willis et Elizabeth Carto, propriétaires d’American Free Press. Il menaçait de dévoiler encore plus que ce que ce qu’il avait déjà dévoilé. Ce qui devrait attiser nos soupçons ou à tout le moins justifier un examen en profondeur de ces révélations.
Car Piper avertissait ses auditeurs qu’il pourrait très bien être retrouvé mort dans peu de temps, assassiné par le Mossad, ou par la Scientologie, car la Scientologie, qui est sous contrôle du Mossad depuis le début des années 1980, n’hésite pas, rappelait-il (le 14 mai 2015), à éliminer physiquement ses ennemis! Piper avait souvent expliqué que la Scientologie, avec tout son arsenal de techniques de manipulation mentale mis à profit sur son armée de serviles agents, est sous le contrôle du Mossad depuis qu’elle a été rachetée par le riche juif et parrain d’Israël, Edgar Bronfman, au début des années 1980, avec l’aide d’une équipe d’avocats juifs menée par le juif scientologue Lawrence Heller.
Ce n’est pas dans un esprit borné, « antisecte », que Piper s’est fait des ennemis du côté de la Scientologie. Cela vient plutôt du fait que depuis que la Scientologie a conclu un pacte avec la CIA au début des années 1980, elle n’a plus à payer d’impôt, en échange de quoi elle doit travailler conjointement avec la CIA dans le cadre d’opérations de collecte de renseignement et d’infiltration-sabotage du mouvement nationaliste et révisionniste aux États-Unis. Ainsi de nombreux agents de la Scientologie ont infiltré et noyauté le mouvement révisionniste et nationaliste américain. L’organisation Liberty Lobby, qui publiait à l’époque le journal de l’Institute for Historical Review ainsi que le renommé journal d’enquête The Spotlight, ne pouvait donc y échapper. Ce fut le début d’une longue saga opposant les nationalistes et les révisionnistes éclairés aux infiltrateurs-agents de la Scientologie. Or ces derniers ont finalement gagné et ont pris le contrôle de l’IHR. C’est ainsi que Mark Weber, cet escroc prétendument révisionniste qui dirigeait cette équipe d’infiltrés pour le compte de la Scientologie et de la CIA, a pris le contrôle de l’IHR, mettant ainsi la main personnellement sur des millions de dollars. C’est ainsi que l’IHR devint l’équivalent des Trusts soviétiques d’autrefois: une opposition contrôlée, destinée à collecter les noms des dissidents et à maintenir la dissidence sous contrôle et sous haute surveillance. Piper a écrit en 2005 un long dossier (retiré de son livre The Judas Goats, mais disponible sur balderexlibris sous le titre « Coup d’Etat ») sur la prise de contrôle de l’IHR par des éléments liés à la Scientologie (Mossad), l’Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith (Mossad) et la CIA.
Or l’histoire ne s’arrête pas là en ce qui concerne la Scientologie et les activités nationalistes de l’organisation Liberty Lobby de Willis Carto. Liberty Lobby a fait banqueroute, le journal The Spotlight, qui était très populaire, a fermé, et en 2001 est né American Free Press. Piper travailla pour American Free Press comme il avait travaillé pour The Spotlight. Mais des efforts persistants ont été déployés afin de le faire renvoyer du journal. À plusieurs reprises, d’importantes sommes d’argent ont été promises à la direction du journal en échange de quoi ils devaient se débarrassent du méchant antijuif Michael Collins Piper qui ne veut rien savoir des théories du complot de Sandy Hook. Ces tentatives nombreuses se sont révélées infructueuses, jusqu’à ce que les conflits à l’interne se multiplient à American Free Press impliquant Michael Collins Piper et les partisans des théories du complot de Sandy Hook, qui croient que le massacre de Sandy Hook n’est d’autre qu’un canular. L’auteur d’origine grecque vivant aux États-Unis Pete Papaherakles est l’un de ceux qui ont fait pression pour infléchir la ligne éditoriale d’American Free Press en exigeant que soient inclus des articles s’en prenant violemment aux Noirs, aux arabes et aux musulmans, aux gays, et promouvant la théorie du complot de Sandy Hook (théorie que la ligne éditoriale d’American Free Press avait rejeté jusqu’ici). À cette nouvelle ligne éditoriale intenable, Piper s’est fortement opposé, mais Papaherakles, grâce à sa proximité avec Elisabeth Carto et surtout grâce au début de sénilité du vétéran et premier propriétaire du journal Willis Carto, a tout de même réussi à prendre le contrôle du journal, ce qui explique probablement pourquoi le site et le journal sont de plus en plus repoussants par son racisme affiché (au grand plaisir de nos ennemis qui veulent que les antijuifs soient tous identifié au suprématisme blanc). Ce n’est que plus tard, après son renvoi de l’équipe du journal, que Piper découvrira les liens de Papaherakles avec la Scientologie, ainsi que ses manigances en coulisse visant à le faire renvoyer du journal, et ce en collaboration avec les mêmes qui avaient autrefois tenté de soudoyer les propriétaires pour le faire renvoyer. (Comme Piper l’a montré dans son livre The Judas Goats, mais sans nommer expressément la Scientologie, les sectes servant à des opérations des services secrets comme la Scientologie utilisent souvent, pour mener des opérations d’infiltration et de sabotage, des ex-alcooliques et des personnalités déviantes, visages à deux faces, parfois affublées de dédoublement de la personnalité. Ce profil correspond tout à fait à Pete Papaherakles, comme le soulignait Piper durant la dernière année de sa vie.) Voilà ce qui a conduit au renvoi de Piper: les manigances de Papaherakles, en lien avec le conflit à l’interne sur la question de la théorie du complot de Sandy Hook et sur la ligne de plus en plus anti-islam et suprémaciste blanc (anti-noir, anti-arabe, etc.) du journal. Ce conflit avait d’ailleurs conduit au renvoi d’un auteur douteux du nom de John Friend, un ami et allié du désinformateur notoire et ennemi juré de Piper, James Fetzer. Mais grâce aux pressions de Pete Papaherakles, John Friend a été réembauché par le journal qui est maintenant sous contrôle d’Elizabeth Carto (son époux le propriétaire Willis Carto étant semi-sénile) et de son bras droit, l’agent de la scientologie Pete Papaherakles. En ce qui concerne les livres de Piper publiés par AFP, AFP a clairement dit qu’il ne réimprimera aucun des livres de Piper.
VIDEO – Michael Collins Piper being evicted from AFP Audio inédit de source inconnue où il dit que même les juifs ne lui ont pas fait ce que Elisabeth Carto lui a fait…AUDIO – Les dernières émissions de radio internet de Michael Collins Piper sont disponibles ici gratuitement, mis à part celle du 27 Avril 2015 qui est réservée aux abonnés, où il indiquait qu’il prévoyait faire des révélations sur le rôle d’Elisabeth Carto, l’épouse de Willis Carto, dans la destruction de Liberty Lobby et le l’IHR (révélations qu’ils n’a jamais pu faire). Il parle aussi du rôle de l’infiltré de la Scientologie Pete Papaherakles dans la prise de contrôle d’AFP.
Dans ses articles et à son émission de radio, Piper n’hésitait pas à nommer la Scientologie par son nom, surtout lorsqu’il dénonçait ses activités au service du Mossad et de l’Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith. Il savait pertinemment et soulignait régulièrement (dernière référence: 14 mai 2015) que la Scientologie n’hésite pas à se débarrasser de ses ennemis en les éliminant carrément et de manière à ce que personne ne puisse suspecter un règlement de comptes.
(Si Piper a été tué, alors ceux qui ont fait le coup ne seront pas contents d’apprendre que le document « Coup d’Etat » ait été rendu public, puisque ce dernier identifie clairement ceux qui avaient grand intérêt à se débarrasser de lui rapidement, avant qu’il fasse les révélations fracassantes qu’il avait promis de faire depuis qu’il se trouvait hors circuit, renvoyé par son employeur.)
|Michael Collins Piper préparait un livre
sur Hitler, mais Barnes Review a décidé
d’écarter Piper pour faire un numéro spécial
Piper était non seulement un combattant mais aussi un chaud partisan des grands hommes de notre temps. Il vouait une admiration sans borne pour Thomas Jefferson, Adolf Hitler, Léon Degrelle, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, Hugo Chavez, Vladimir Poutine et même, dans une certaine mesure, Staline. Il s’était rapproché et même lié d’amitié avec certains politiciens qui ont osé tenir tête à la domination juive: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, le président de Malaisie Mahatir Mohamad, l’ancien président des Philippines Ferdinand Marcos et son épouse. Il soutenait l’oeuvre et l’héritage politique du tsar Nicolas 2, Charles Lindbergh, John F. Kennedy, et d’autres plus récents comme Cynthia McKinney. Piper reconnaissait l’apport inestimable d’auteurs tels que Henry Ford, Paquita de Shishmareff, le père Charles Coughlin, Arnold Leese, Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins, pour ne nommer que certains des plus connus. Dans le mouvement patriote, il s’est lié à des personalités peu connues mais qui eurent une grande influence en coulisse sur des hommes politiques qui ont marqué l’histoire. Son patron Willis Carto avait lui-même rencontré des nationalistes influents et des politiciens de haut calibre, tels que Joseph P. Kennedy, l’homme de l’ombre François Genoud, DeWest Hooker, Laurence Dennis, Francis Parker Yockey et le général Smedley Butler (auteur de « War is a Racket »). Carto a également connu le fameux Benjamin Freedman, l’un des antisionistes les plus célèbres. C’est grâce à Willis Carto que Piper a pu nouer des liens d’amitié avec des personnalités célèbres de l’antisionisme telles que l’auteur respecté Alfred Lilienthal, Haviv Schieber (qui fut le premier maire de Beersheba, une ville voisine de Dimona), Jack Bernstein et l’irremplaçable avocat Mark Lane (auteur du premier livre révélant le rôle de la CIA dans l’assassinat de JFK, et auteur également de la préface du livre de Piper « Best Witness » sur la fraude d’un survivant de l’Holocauste). Alors qu’il était encore jeune, il a travaillé à la campagne de son grand ami David Duke pour le parti Populiste.
|Extrait du livre « My First Days in the White House » de Michael Collins Piper (à gauche dans la photo).|
Piper a écrit un livre à la défense du congressiste Jim Traficant, emprisonné pour avoir proféré des vérités interdites sur la domination d’Israël sur la politique, les médias et l’économie américaine, et pour avoir défendu en cour le prisonnier de guerre de la Seconde Guerre mondiale John Demjanjuk alors qu’il était en procès en Israël. Mais parmi toutes ses amitiés et fréquentations c’est l’auteur Andrew St.George qui aura la plus grande influence sur lui, car c’est lui qui a révélé l’identité des néoconservateurs anciennement internationalistes troskyistes, combattant le soviétisme et le stalinisme, reconvertis dans l’internationalisme américano-sioniste non seulement anti-communiste mais surtout anti-nationaliste, et plus spécialement anti-islam et anti-arabe. Il combattait pour la reconnaissance du peuple palestinien, comme il combattait pour la reconnaissance des survivants du USS Liberty, ce navire américain que les forces israéliennes ont tenté de faire couler à coups de missiles et de napalm (afin de provoquer une 3e guerre mondiale entre la Russie et les USA), ce qu’Israël dénie officiellement même si les médias israéliens admettent que l’État israélien savait ce qu’il faisait. Piper a toujours défendu les révisionnistes. Il était, en revanche, très agacé de devoir répondre à des questions concernant la Seconde guerre mondiale et l’Holocauste lorsqu’il était question de son livre sur JFK, puisque son livre sur JFK n’a rien à voir avec l’Holocauste! Contre la propagande sans fin sur l’Holocauste, plutôt que de minimiser l’Holocauste, Piper a choisi de répéter qu’il en avait tout simplement marre, qu’on en a tous marre et qu’il est temps pour les juifs de passer à autre chose et surtout de rejoindre la communauté de l’humanité, d’abandonner leur séparatisme maladif et de rejoindre l’universel humain. Car les juifs sont des hommes comme les autres, pas plus ou moins spéciaux qui quiconque sur cette planète.
Voyons combien révélatrices ont été les mésaventures de Michael Collins Piper avec des éléments malhonnêtes du mouvement tels que John Judge, Peter Dale Scott, Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, Robert Groden, Mark Weber, Andrew E. Allen, Jared Taylor, Eric Jon Phelps, Chris Bollyn, Eric Hufschmid, Mike Delaney, John Stadtmiller, Jim Condit Jr., Carolyn Yeager, James Fetzer, John Friend, Pete Papaherakles, sans oublier ses anciens employeurs le couple Willis et Elisabeth Carto.
Les mensonges de Chris Bollyn
* En fait toute notre enquête sur Bollyn pourrait s’arrêter ici-même en soulevant un seul et unique point, révélation unique de l’état mental absolument incroyable de ce Chris Bollyn. Pour tout dire, Bollyn soutient que Piper n’a peut-être jamais existé, dans ses propres mots (puisque je n’invente rien) Bollyn « questionne l’idée-même qu’un homme du nom de Michael Collins Piper écrive des livres’. ainsi peut-on lire de sa plume sur son site: « I question whether a man named Michael Collins Piper [real name Michael Bernard Piper] actually wrote « books » per se. » Pour une personne sensée et rigoureuse dans ses démarches, cette seule affirmation frisant la folie discréditerait d’entrée de jeu un interlocuteur tel que Bollyn. Mais il faut aller plus loin pour mettre en lumière l’étendue de la fraude et de la corruption morale de Bollyn, comme nous le ferons dans les prochains articles.
Chris Bollyn a été engagé à American Free Press à l’insistance d’un certain Khazar autoproclamé nommé Jerry Myers. Piper sentit dès le part que Bollyn et son épouse trempaient dans quelque chose de louche — les services secrets — mais il a eu la naïveté de croire qu’ils étaient peut-être avec une partie franche des services secrets opposée aux sionistes. Bollyn a foutu la pagaille dans l’organisation d’AFP après un incident qu’il a provoqué lui-même impliquant la police à son domicile, incident pour lequel il tient responsable l’Anti-Defamation League en collaboration avec Michael Collins Piper du journal AFP. Pour expliquer ce prétendu complot de Piper en lien avec l’ADL, Bollyn accusa Piper d’être l’amant homosexuel et l’agent d’un prétendu maître-espion de l’ADL. Tout ce délire contribua fortement à la notoriété de Bollyn, tout en révélant aux chercheurs les plus perspicaces sa véritable nature de menteur pathologique, travaillant probablement dans le cadre d’une opération de désinformation et de salissage du mouvement pour la vérité.
MCP continues with his discussion of the possible Khazar origins of the Boleyn family as well as a round up of the day’s important news.
A Note from Michael Collins Piper about this SPECIAL « blast from the past » . . . Thanks for all of the excellent input surrounding the 2 hour visit with Victor Thorn on the last podcast.
In light of the interest on the part of many new listeners (and many new listeners there are) regarding the shocking fact that I periodically report negative data about Christopher Bollyn and his consort, Helje Brand Kaskel, I thought our listeners might be intrigued in hearing the radio broadcast that touched off Bollyn’s campaign to destroy and defame me and American Free Press, the newspaper that helped bring him international acclaim (which we now know was far from deserved). In fact, the aforementioned Victor Thorn—along with Bollyn—was a guest on this broadcast.
Concerned that there was an unfortunate rift between one of AFP’s writers (Bollyn) and one of AFP’s best supporters (Thorn), I invited both of them on the program to discuss Thorn’s (now obviously quite correct) questions about the circumstances surrounding a police arrest of Bollyn in his front yard in Schaumburg, Illinois. I assumed this would be an opportunity to set things straight and reach a friendly public accord and give Bollyn the opportunity to answer Thorn’s criticisms.
I think that any HONEST person listening to this broadcast can see that this was no « ADL setup » as Bollyn told many people publicly and privately, alleging that I–along with an assortment of others, including Victor Thorn–had collaborated with the ADL and Homeland Security and God Knows Who Else to arrange for Bollyn to get arrested and then later « smear » him by inviting him on my program.
As far as the police attack on Bollyn (however unwarranted) please remember that it was Bollyn himself who CALLED the police in the first place. The police just didn’t show up and start tasering him!
Also, for your information, in the opening minutes of the show, Bollyn desperately tries to defame AFP (for whom he was still working!) by saying that he saw evidence of two possible « plants » or « infiltrators. » One of them was Jack Ross, a stout Jewish gentleman (referred to as such by Bollyn) who was, in fact, a peripheral figure who had written several articles for AFP and who only ever visited the AFP office on perhaps two occasions, maybe three at most! And Ross is an outspoken ANTI-ZIONIST Jew.
Bollyn also refers to another person (who was at The SPOTLIGHT–the paper that preceded AFP). She was NEVER at AFP itself, having left long before. Bollyn claims that she is Jewish. No, she was NOT Jewish and the reason why she spoke a bit of Hebrew was because she had once been in love with a Jewish man and had tried to « learn his culture, » but she had been rejected by him. (Contrast that with Bollyn who speaks Hebrew because he married a Jewish woman in Israel who worked for Israeli intelligence!)
Listeners will note that, at the end of the program, I speak glowingly of some material that I felt vindicated Bollyn. If I were out to « get » him as he claims, that’s hardly something that I would do.
At that point little did I know that Bollyn–as a direct result of this program—would suddenly claim I was an ADL operative. This came after I had personally spent YEARS promoting Bollyn, calling him « the best journalist in America–bar none, » glorifying him with a picture and praise in my book THE HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR and, before that, in my book FINAL JUDGMENT.
And this came AFTER I had personally asked Bollyn to fill my time slot for a month on another network when I was traveling overseas as the guest of, among others, former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, one of the world’s foremost critics of Zionism! (If I were trying to undermine Bollyn and deny him what he perceives to be his due fame and fortune, it seems unlikely—doesn’t it–that I would ask him to enjoy the opportunity to be heard?!?)
Bollyn’s tone and attitude speaks for itself.
And note that Bollyn spends time trying to defame Victor Thorn (who has always been the first to acknowledge that his real name is Scott Makufka and that Victor Thorn is his pen name) and also slamming Victor because Victor was a cab driver—as though cab drivers are somehow the lowest of the low and incapable of research and writing (and if you’ve read Victor’s multiple writings and books, you know that he has produced quite a bit of solid work over the years).
Bollyn now claims that I had been attacking him for years, citing the fact that he received nasty, vulgar emails using my email address just shortly before he was scheduled to come to speak (along with me and David Duke and numerous others) at a conference organized by the famed Jurgen Graf in conjunction with THE BARNES REVIEW. In fact, Bollyn knew full well–as Graf and others can confirm–that all of the key speakers (including me) were receiving such emails, ostensibly from the other participants! I myself received one that was attributed to Jurgen Graf. Yet, Bollyn still continues to tell this lie over and over again, even though he knows he has been refuted!
All of this LACK of credibility on the part of Bollyn, including his childish, self-centered behavior, is demonstrated clearly on this recording of the old radio broadcast that first revealed Bollyn’s insanity and inanity.
And I would add, for the record, that subsequent to this, Daryl Bradford Smith and I patched things up, recognizing that we had BOTH been taken to the cleaners by Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid. And don’t forget, too, that even now Bollyn is attacking Hufschmid, whom he consulted with via telephone on a daily basis for years!
Oh, there’s so much more to the story . . . But I thought you might enjoy a reprise of this bizarre broadcast and get an introduction to the Weird World of Kinky Balloon and his brazen exhibitionist of a wife, Helje Brand Kaskel.
Ron Paul supporters do not necessarily support the Tea Party movement; nor any other particular parties and organizations. Mike also explores nefarious bank scam connections held by Christopher Bollyn.
Le problème des « experts » de JFK
À propos de Peter Dale Scott, Robert Groden et Jim Marrs:
Est-il étonnant que Peter Dale Scott évite soigneusement la piste israélienne ?
(Michael Collins Piper, FALSE FLAGS—TEMPLATE FOR TERROR: An Analytical Critique of the Covert Model Utilized by the Conspirators who Orchestrated 9/11, the Oklahoma City Bombing, the JFK Assassination, Sandy Hook, and Boston.)
Michael Collins Piper (Final Judgment, Appendix 8) à propos des livres de Peter Dale Scott:
Crime and Cover-Up: The Dallas-Watergate Connection by Peter Dale Scott, a slim monograph on the subject, is fascinating. It examines the special interest groups in Washington that were opposed to JFK and their ties to Organized Crime and the intelligence community. Needless to say, however, Scott doesn’t get into the Israeli Connection.
Likewise with Scott’s equally fascinating, far lengthier, and more recent Deep Politics and The Death of JFK. This book is severely flawed in that just when one thinks that Scott is about to get into the Israeli Connection (whether through his discussion of Organized Crime or through the CIA), Scott very carefully tiptoes away.
Scott’s research is deficient in that despite the depth and breadth of his work he never gets into the Garrison investigation whatsoever. There I believe is another very serious flaw. One never knows precisely who Scott suspects of responsibility for the assassination. As I have said, Scott says very much, but at the same time, says very little. Nonetheless his writings are well worth your while.
|Mae Magnin Brussell|
Un autre auteur qui a tenté de mettre l’assassinat de JFK sur le dos des nazis est Mae Brussell. Elle a eu une grande influence sur John Judge et Dave Emory, ainsi que sur une grande partie du mouvement « patriote », grâce à Alex Jones et autres qui font constamment la promotion de la théorie du « grand complot nazi ». JOHN JUDGE, QUI ORGANISE DEPUIS LONGTEMPS DES CONGRÈS CONSPIRATIONNISTES SUR L’ASSASSINAT DE JFK A RÉPONDU AINSI À LA QUESTION POURQUOI PERSONNE DANS CES CONFÉRENCES NE PARLE DE LA THÈSE DE MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER : « NI MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER NI SON LIVRE N’ONT DE PLACE DANS CES RÉUNIONS ». Mae Brussell est née dans une riche famille juive de Berverly Hills propriétaire d’une grande chaîne de magasins (I. Magnin Dept. Store). Son père était le rabbin le plus influent de la communauté juive d’Hollywood. Dans son article « The Nazi Connection to the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Evidence of link between Nazis still in operation after World War II to the still unsolved murder of John F. Kennedy », elle identifie Reinhard Gehlen comme étant un de ces nazis qui aurait ensuite été engagé par les États-Unis pour travailler à l’Office of Strategic Services (OSS), soit l’ancêtre de la CIA. Or le fait est que ce Reinhard Gehlen était un agent des services secrets israéliens! De par sa position au sein de l’OSS, il a contribué à établir de nombreux ponts avec Israël. Son rôle alla plutôt dans le même sens que la traque des nazis réfugiés un peu partout dans le monde. Loin de faire entrer des nazis au gouvernement américain, il contribua de par ses liens avec Israël dans la traque aux nazis, à purger les institutions américaines de tous les sympathisants nazis qui s’y trouvaient, contribuant ainsi plus que quiconque à la sionisation intégrale de l’appareil gouvernemental et de l’appareil de renseignement américain. C’est ainsi que l’OSS devint un véritable nid d’espions sionistes. Comment peut-être alors accuser la CIA d’être un repaire de nazis?
Wikipedia John Loftus:
“John Joseph Loftus (February 12, 1950) is an American author, former U.S. government prosecutor and former Army intelligence officer. He is a president of The Intelligence Summit and, although he is not Jewish, a president of the Florida Holocaust Museum. Loftus also serves on the Board of Advisers to Public Information Research.(…)He began working for the U.S. Department of Justice in 1977 and in 1979 joined their Office of Special Investigations, which was charged with prosecuting and deporting Nazi war criminals in the US. Loftus’ now-expired Web site claimed, “As a young U.S. Army officer, John Loftus helped train Israelis on a covert operation that turned the tide of battle in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.”(…)He also writes regularly for Ami, an Orthodox Jewish weekly news magazine.On August 7, 2005, he provided the United States address of an alleged terrorist named Iyad K. Hilal on Fox News. Only afterwards was it revealed that Hilal had left the address three years previously and the home was now owned by a family, which was then subjected to threats and vandalism and required police protection as a result of Loftus’ words. Fox terminated Loftus’s contract to commentate after the event. Loftus said “I thought it might help police in that area now that we have positively identified a terrorist,” but he did not say why he did not contact police in a more direct manner. Loftus apologized for the mistake and expressed frustration about “one federal [agency’s]” inaction on an earlier tip he had given them years ago due to the same address. » [Wikipedia.org]
John Loftus – Author of The Secret War Against the Jews, a new book which claims that anti-Israel partisans in the American intelligence community have sought to sabotage the state of Israel. (Loftus is a former attorney with the Nazi-hunting Office of Special Investigations.)
Déc. 2010: Éjection du réseau RBN
Because there are many rumors circulating, I will outline my perceptions of the matter.
MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER
Fév. 2011: la subversion de l’IHR (rappel)
Ne pas manquer les révélations de feu Michael Collins Piper sur la destruction de l’IHR par les forces de la CIA-Mossad qui ont favorisé le coup d’État mené par Mark Weber avec l’aide d’Andrew E. Allen:
MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER
Jewish and CIA Involvement in the IHR Coup
from The SPOTLIGHT
with a postscript
IHR Update [On the Takeover Coup of the IHR]
2013: Publication des lettres de JFK
In March 1992, Representative Paul Findley of Illinois, wrote in the Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs, “It is interesting. . . . to notice that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned.” Two years later in his book Final Judgment, author Michael Collins Piper actually accused Israel of the crime. Of all the conspiracy theories, it remains one of the most intriguing.What is indisputable is that, although it was kept out of the eye of both the Press and the Public, a bitter dispute had developped between Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion who believed that his nation’s survival depended on it attaining nuclear capability and Kennedy who was vehemently opposed to it. In May 1963, Kennedy wrote to Ben-Gurion explaining why he was convinced that Israel’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability was a serious threat to world peace.
(Lire les dernières correspondances de Ben-Gourion et JFK ici)
I’ll tell you one thing: I found articles – not tripped in publications but in very sophisticated publications – saying, « Forget Lyndon Johnson, forget the CIA, forget Fidel Castro—Mossad killed JFK because they were upset by what he had done to Ben-Gurion. » So you see, we drop a few bombs like this in this book, unproven …(Historian Martin W. Sandler, Author of The Letters of John F. Kennedy, lecture at the JFK Museum; Nov 16, 2013, CSPAN2 | BookTV @51 min : 21 sec)
Déc. 2014: Éjection d’AFP-Barnes Review
The Weird World of Elisabeth Carto at American Free Press
AN UPDATE FROM MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER
TO THE GOOD PEOPLE WHO HAVE COME TO MY RESCUE
I just got a letter from a nice lady who told me that AFP was being just as disingenuous as I told her they would be : The lady called and spoke to Julia Foster, the office manager, who praised me up and down and said what a wonderful writer I was, but that I had NOT been fired. Rather, she said, I QUIT when they offered me a contract that I refused to sign.
The truth is, I have a copy of my signed contract, signed when I was sitting in a hospital room in April after open heart surgery, no less, and I also have a signed letter from Willis Carto terminating that contract because I had supposedly said bad things about him, his wife, Elisabeth and « fellow employees » (such as John Friend, whom Carto had just fired!).
And you’re darned right I said bad things about the people who had mistreated me, not just for the past year but, ultimately, for the last 20 years or more—precisely because I had run afoul of Elisabeth Carto for having had an argument with her sister, Marianne Scharnhorst, who had been employed by The SPOTLIGHT (before AFP came into being at the demise of The SPOTLIGHT). And as you’ll see, Mrs. Carto’s sister was a very real trouble-maker who caused trouble for me and for many other SPOTLIGHT employees.
In any case, in a court of law, those signed documents (referenced above) constitute EVIDENCE and the evidence demonstrates that Mrs. Foster, nice lady though she is, is either: 1) deliberately lying, knowing the full story; or 2) passing on a lie having been ordered to do so by the perverse Elisabeth Carto and her dementia-ridden husband (who still retains a skill for spinning a good lie, at least when it comes to explaining away and defending his wife).
(On another occasion in the past, Julia told somebody that I was « working at home » – rather than in the office – because I was « too disruptive. » In other words, I dared to disagree with Elisabeth Carto. That was before I was officially fired twice this past year. So they have a history of telling quite creative stories.)
If Mike Piper is so rotten and deserved to be fired, well, why not then simply demonstrate how rotten he is? If Piper is such a bad guy, people should know about it.
However, of course, the fact is that it all goes back to Elisabeth Carto and her insane behavior (about which all current and past staff are aware) and the AFP staff don’t want to talk about it, nor are they allowed to do so, for obvious reasons.
The truth is that even Liberty Lobby’s outstanding attorney, Mark Lane, who fought relentlessly to save Liberty Lobby under fire from the IHR lawsuits that eventually destroyed Liberty Lobby, said, on one occasion, that he believed that it was Elisabeth Carto’s behavior toward the staff in California that helped stimulate a lot of the discontent that was stirred up by outside forces.
And the truth is that Elisabeth was even moving to have Mark Lane’s salary cut (even in the midst of the legal affairs that ended up destroying Liberty Lobby.))—working to undermine the very attorney who saved Liberty Lobby in the Hunt and Buckley cases some years before.
Here’s the story that only a few people know about . . .
One weekend in approximately 1993-1994 (it was well after we had already fallen under the IHR lawsuits) Willis Carto was getting ready to leave Washington in a rush. He called me into his office and handed me a letter that Carto had written to Liberty Lobby’s longtime and valued counsel, Mark Lane.
Carto had been convinced by Elisabeth that Lane was “making too much money” by being paid a regular salary or retainer without “documenting” his work for Liberty Lobby. In other words, it was being suggested to Carto that Lane was essentially taking advantage and not doing his work for a flat fee. Carto was convinced by his wife to demand that Lane provide an hourly accounting of all of his work for Liberty Lobby.
In response to Carto’s request, Lane had therefore re-assessed all of his work for Liberty Lobby during the past period and submitted a line-by-line summary, billing Liberty Lobby BY THE HOUR rather than by the standard payment that Lane had been receiving.
(In other words, by previous agreement, if Lane did NOTHING in one week or one month he would still be paid if he was working 50 hour weeks on behalf of Liberty Lobby in the courts.)
After Lane submitted his HOURLY billing, it was considerably higher than what it would have been in a previous agreement. Lane, again, had done this at Carto’s request.
Having received the billing, Carto wrote a letter to Lane telling him that, unfortunately, he (Carto) was forced to sever Liberty Lobby’s relationship with Lane.
Carto asked me to read this letter (after Carto had left, and Carto was, at that moment, on the verge of leaving) and then deliver it to Lane by Monday morning. Carto left and I read the letter – shocked. I decided to wait until the very last moment – Sunday night – to deliver the letter.
However, fortunately, Carto reconsidered his decision and managed to catch me – as usual – working in the office on Sunday afternoon. He called me from California and asked, “Did you deliver that letter yet?” I said, “No, I was waiting till the very last minute.” Carto said, “Good for you. Don’t. I’ve had some second thoughts and talked to Mark in the meantime.”
In fact, Lane had only prepared the hourly assessment (at Carto’s request) to demonstrate to Carto that he (Lane) was actually providing Carto a lot of little-noticed or “unknown” work that Lane did not normally bother to “write down” and “prove” himself.
I sympathized with Mark Lane’s plight at the time. I was also being subjected to the same abuse. He and his wife and I had a private discussion about the matter and they were just absolutely amazed that Elisabeth had tried to over-turn a long and trusted working relationship and were quite disturbed about it, since Mark and his wife had become rather fond of Willis himself and often invited Willis and I over to their home for very lovely dinners.
But that was not the end of things . . . it gets worse.
In 1994 I spoke to Willis Carto on the telephone. He was in California and I was in Washington. It was a day or so before attorney Mark Lane was scheduled to handle Liberty Lobby’s defense in a Southern California courtroom in the lawsuit that ultimately forced Liberty Lobby into bankrupty. I was enthusiastic about the possibility of Lane once again winning for Liberty Lobby by taking the case to a jury – much as he had done in the famous Buckley case and in the Hunt case before it. I asked Carto: “So you are definitely taking the case to a jury?” Carto responded: “Oh absolutely.” I said: “That’s good.”
However, here’s what happened . . .
A day or so later, Mark Lane called Willis Carto to tell him that he (Lane) was getting ready to get on the plane to come to California to proceed with the case (jury selection, etc). But Carto said, “Oh, well, we’ve already started. We decided not to go with a jury. Randy Weir (the West Coast attorney on the ground) thinks we can win the case by just presenting it to the judge and we can save the costs of a long trial.”
In fact, Randy Weir had convinced Elisabeth Carto (who was already hostile to Mark Lane and wanting to cut his salary – as outlined above)—that they didn’t need Mark’s expertise and that they could « save money » by eliminating a jury trial.
Lane was horrified and jumped on a plane, but it was already too late. The case was lost and Liberty Lobby was directed down the course to bankruptcy.
Had Randy Weir been bought off? It’s possible. Weir’s partner, Brian Urtnowski, discovered that Weir was a cocaine-addicted crook. And this discovery brought back memories from Mark Lane (and even Michael Piper) as to strange activity by Weir that indicated that perhaps indeed he had been compromised. (And it’s probably just a coincidence that Weir was a look-alike and talk-alike for a young man who was “advising” Liberty Lobby on the East Coast: Todd Blodgett).
But ultimately the blame for the demise of Liberty Lobby could be laid directly at WALTRAUD ELISABETH OLDEMEIER CARTO.
Perhaps a jury might have also found against Liberty Lobby, but WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would expect a judge to rule in favor of Liberty Lobby?
I more or less forgive Julia Foster for telling the sad little lies that she is telling since I know that she is under immense pressure from Elisabeth Carto and because of the fact that Julia knows a little bit about the history of the behavior of Elisabeth and her sister, Marianne Scharnhorst.
Marianne used to sexually harass Julia’s teen-aged son, Jimmy, who worked briefly at Liberty Lobby. Marianne used to get touchy-feeling with a lot of the younger men (20s or younger) and would make a big fuss over them when they came into the mailroom where she worked. She would shout « there’s that Greek hunk » to one young man and engage him in sexual banter in front of the women in the mailroom; or she would make similar remarks to other young men. She once openly described how she had dreamt that she and her youngest daughter (a teen-ager) had watched me having sex with a prostitute through the window of an adjoining building! She once even took SPOTLIGHT (and later AFP) Editor Chris Petherick’s head and placed it on her bosom – and an ample bosom it was.
Since I crossed this woman, Marianne, years before, I have been a target of Elisabeth Carto. This is the same Elisabeth Carto who also alleged in an email that the talented and hard-working Trish Katson was a « lazy bum » who spent all of her time at Liberty Lobby « chasing men » in the office. In fact, most of the time that she worked there, Trish lived with Blayne Hutzel – who also worked at Liberty Lobby – so she was hardly busy chasing other men in front of Blayne. Or behind his back for that matter.
If Trish was so lazy and so immoral, I guess that means that Liberty Lobby and The SPOTLIGHT were lying audaciously and repeatedly and relentlessly in reporting all her good work on Capitol Hill and around the country, particularly when she was fighting the Constitutional Convention.
And so it goes.
Now having looked back at some of these things, I realized that there’s probably a lot more to tell you about the antics of Elisabeth Carto and I decided that it’s probably worth telling you all about it.
And so I shall continue . . .
It’s a deeply-held secret—or rather, perhaps, one that’s been carefully “forgotten”—but, in early 1982, Willis Carto fired famed and respected Bilderberg Hound Jim Tucker as editor of The SPOTLIGHT, a post he had held since 1975—he was the founding editor—and under which time The SPOTLIGHT had grown to some 390,000 paid subscribers (meaning at least 1,000,000 or more weekly readers).
The reason for Tucker’s sudden and shocking dismissal (one which rocked The SPOTLIGHT staff) is interesting . . . And it all traces back (yet again) to the insane behavior of Elisabeth Carto and her equally disturbed sister, Marianne Scharnhorst, who worked in the mailroom (and in the silver sales department) of Liberty Lobby.
Let’s see how the Carto’s sycophants who actually know the truth of this story try to twist it and make Michael Collins Piper out to be a liar. Here’s what happened . . .
Let’s face it, Jim Tucker was a big drinker, and he was loud and proud about it. One could hardly have a discussion with Tucker without him bringing up alcohol in a funny way. And throughout the period that he was SPOTLIGHT editor, he was known to have “wet lunches.” There was no secret about it. He and a few others (including a number of SPOTLIGHT associates) were regulars at Mike Palm’s, the Taverna, and a few other choice drinking establishments near Liberty Lobby headquarters. There had always been an official “no drinking at lunch” policy at Liberty Lobby, though it was rigorously ignored most of all by Tucker and by Liberty Lobby chairman Bob Bartell and that was an open secret.
And although Tucker was a big drinker, he got The SPOTLIGHT out each and every week—often 48 full pages jam-packed with (you remember it) solid news and information that gave The SPOTLIGHT the reputation that it had.
One particular week, one Wednesday (the day that the paper went to press), Ed Krueger, the affable publisher of the Martinsburg, West Virginia newspaper that did the actual printing of The SPOTLIGHT, had come to Washington and he took Tucker and several others out for a typical “wet lunch.”
When Tucker returned, he may have been a bit tipsy—PERHAPS more so than usual. I don’t know, personally.
But what I DO know (and this was common knowledge at the time) is that Marianne Scharnhorst—Elisabeth Carto’s sister—who was always stirring up trouble and who routinely referred to Tucker as a “pig”—called the Cartos in California to report that Jim Tucker was “drunk on press day.”
The commotion stirred by Marianne’s phone call led to Tucker’s firing. Tucker was given several weeks to wind up affairs, as I recall, and then he left Liberty Lobby soon afterward.
Years later, I learned from Donna McGrath, who was Tucker’s good friend in the production department, that Tucker was suicidal at this time.
(And, believe it or not, I had a very dark dream about Tucker during this period—when I had no contact with him whatsoever, and really didn’t know him that well—in which he was sitting in a dark room, crying, and warning me about Willis Carto! Over the past several years I have told a number of people about the dream.)
Some time later Tucker was “rehired” as a “contract” writer for The SPOTLIGHT and continued on with his work, while working other jobs on the side, but, again, the bottom line is that Tucker’s firing was the work of Elisabeth Carto and her sister Marianne Scharnhorst.
Elisabeth and Marianne are the very same “pigs”—to use their common word—who were behind the harassment that I endured from about 1992-1994 onward, resulting in :
– my near-firing in December of 2002 (as a consequence of which I had my first heart attack),
– my forced ouster from the AFP office, beginning in 2003—they told people I was “working from home” without explaining the real reason why—
– and the subsequent targeting against me, beginning in the summer of 2013, at which time the Cartos hatched a plan to reduce my salary to $1,000 a month with the suggestion that I move back home to Pennsylvania (where I hadn’t lived for over 30 years). YES, THEY DID THAT. What creeps (to use another of Elisabeth’s favorite terms) they are. AND :
– My first firing in mid-March 2014—after I confronted Elisabeth for her not-so-secret role in targeting me for a massive paycut—and and then my “rehiring” after six weeks of sick and twisted “negotiations” beginning with a plan to pay me $100 a week.
(I kid you not. That failing old fruit, Willis Carto, actually made that “offer” to me—after 34 years—saying, “Well, why should you be paid any more than any of our other writers?” when the old predator knew that I had done virtually ALL of AFP and The SPOTLIGHT’s direct mail fundraising letters —-plus many other side projects—since about 1986 (six years after I first came aboard).
– My second firing in September of 2014 after I made it clear in several memos to Willis Carto that I didn’t take Elisabeth’s smears, harassment and other forms of mental torment lightly. On the basis of my criticisms and my resurrection of a 10 year old 19-page memorandum exposing the events of 2013 (referenced above), Willis terminated my contract.
Willis also cited alleged criticisms of “fellow employees,” although what those criticisms were actually happened to be were rather interesting: After Elisabeth forced Willis to fire AFP correspondent John Friend (a story in and of itself: she had been gunning for him for a while), Friend had stated publicly that he thought that I had a part in his firing. Friend’s supporters wrote letters to Carto complaining that Friend had been fired and cited my criticisms of John Friend. So although Willis had fired Friend, he cited my past criticisms of Friend as “proof” that I was criticizing “fellow employees” or “co-workers” or some such thing. Talk about Talmudic Chutzpah.
I don’t know a single personal friend of the Cartos—few that there really are—who have ever said anything nice (behind her back) about Elisabeth. One of Carto’s oldest friends has always routinely referred to her as a “bitch.”
She does not inspire respect, but, rather, fear, although Pete Papaherakles (a frequent Carto house-guest) recently said insistently that she does deserve respect, despite the fact that Elisabeth has, in recent years, worked to have the following people fired from AMERICAN FREE PRESS :
– Editor Chris Petherick – he received a faxed demand for his resignation in April (while I was in the hospital with open heart surgery) after he stood up to Elisabeth on the phone, although the next day Willis rescinded the demand.
– Webmaster Jason Snow
– Web Editor Dave Gahary – a family man also targeted for massive pay cuts, despite his major contributions to the growth of the AFP website and his weekly contributions to the newspaper; and
– popular AFP correspondent Victor Thorn. (Elisabeth has said that “my sister and her husband don’t like what he writes.” And I was there the day that Willis Carto said to Chris Petherick, “Maybe we should phase out Victor,” but—naturally and wisely—Chris resisted and Victor was retained).
Elisabeth was directly responsible for the angry campaign to force out longtime loyal employee Anne Cronin—another consequence (going back years) of carping by Marianne Scharnhorst—which resulted in Anne taking early retirement. At one point, while Anne was seriously ill—they actually thought she had bird flu—Elisabeth went into the office, cleaned out Anne’s desk, boxed everything, and left a note for her upon her return to work which told her that her desk was too messy and had too many “personal items” —words to that effect. (Seriously. she did that.)
Initially, when Anne was reaching a certain age, the Cartos put out a memo saying that age happened to be “mandatory retirement” at AFP, but Evangeline Banua, the accountant, advised the Cartos that this was contrary to federal law and the memo was rescinded. But it had clearly been aimed at Anne Cronin!
The Cartos made things so miserable for Anne that she did, in fact, retire a year early. It was so bad that when Anne would come in the office, Willis would actually ignore her (when he has always made a point to say “hello” to everyone) or when she would say hello to him, he would not respond. This was Elisabeth’s doing.
(One time—prior to 2001—after the publication of an edition of my book FINAL JUDGMENT, Elisabeth called me on the phone from California and began quizzing me about the prices for shipping the book. I told her that I had nothing to do with that, that it was Anne Cronin’s responsibility, which, in retrospect, I’m sure Elisabeth knew well.) In the course of this seemingly endless conversation, it became apparent to me that Elisabeth was maneuvering to find “dirt” against Anne and I listened to her ranting and raving. At one juncture she told me that somebody at the office had told her one thing or another and, suspecting something was up, I asked Elisabeth “who told you that?” She said that she didn’t remember, but what he claimed she had been “told” was at the root of her attempt to assassinate Anne.
I said to myself, “Well, I’ll push her on this,” and said to Elisabeth, “Well, it’s important to remember who said that, because it’s not true. That person needs to be set straight.” Elisabeth insisted it wasn’t important, but I pushed a little further—quite gently, but forcefully— and then there was a sudden pause at the other end of the line. Elisabeth then said, “Well, I’ll let you in on a little secret: I made that up.”
This woman actually felt secure enough to admit to me that she had conjured up a lie in order to try to undermine Anne Cronin. And I’ve told that story, in writing, going back to 2003 and I’ve told it to many people at AFP and elsewhere over the past decade. So Elisabeth can’t claim that I recently “made that up,” to use her words.
Vince Ryan was also effectively ousted with regular pay cuts, resulting in his abrupt resignation, after years of very loyal service.
Elisabeth Carto was also responsible for the firing of two longtime AFP-SPOTLIGHT figures: our longtime radio voice, Tom Valentine, who had been with us since at least the mid-1980s (at one point he was the only person among the extended staff whom the Cartos trusted with their home phone number when they lived in California) and Blayne Hutzel, who had been the AFP-SPOTLIGHT comptroller, a hard-working and highly respected detail-oriented business manager whose day-to-day work (under immense pressure from the Cartos) kept the newspaper(s) and related operations going.
Tom and Blayne were fed up with Elisabeth’s antics and—in 2003—at the time Elisabeth was first making a major push to have me fired, they both urged me and the legal board of directors of AFP to formally demand that Willis Carto bar Elisabeth from the AFP office (to stop her harassment and intimidation of the staff). Word got back to Elisabeth and the two were unceremoniously dismissed—despite years of great loyalty and devotion to the AFP-SPOTLIGHT cause and to Willis Carto.
Another AFP office manager, talented young Jim Cox, was also relentlessly and repeatedly run over by Elisabeth Carto and despite his enthusiasm for AFP’s cause, Jim decided that he had had his fill of the lunacy and nonsense and turned in his resignation. Mrs. Carto later proclaimed Cox to be “the worst employee” of AFP’s history, even worse, she said, than the aforementioned Blayne Hutzel.
In fact, Cox and Hutzel were highly regarded by the rest of the AFP staff and their departures were great losses for AFP—but personal triumphs for Elisabeth.
Elisabeth also managed to so alienated longtime AFP-SPOTLIGHT subscription manager, Lois Hodges, who had been with the company since the early 1980s that Lois also resigned. This was after two of Lois’s sisters—who had also worked for AFP—had been forced out by Elisabeth’s antics. The one sister (whose name escapes me) resigned in disgust at Elisabeth. The second sister, in fact, was terminated. It became too much for Lois and she, too, left the company in disgust.
In earlier years, two elderly women, Lois Jackson and Mary Phflug, who had been with Liberty Lobby for years, were also pushed out, again largely because of troublesome behavior by Elisabeth’s sister, Marianne Scharnhorst, who had worked side-by-side with both of those nice ladies for years, but then turned on them and convinced Elisabeth to talk her husband into firing those women. Lois was a devoted correspondence secretary who kept in touch with our supporters. Mary worked in the advertising department. And then, to top it all off, Liberty Lobby legally fought Mary’s attempts to gain unemployment and, if I recall correctly, they succeeded!
It just never seemed to end . . .
On one occasion, when Elisabeth had developed a sudden disdain for California nationalist Joe Fields (another of Mr. and Mrs. Carto’s old friends) she even said that she hoped that the “No More Wars for Israel Conference” being organized by Fields (in conjunction with then-AFP writer Mark Glenn) would—in her words—“flop.”
This was after Fields and his wife had been valuable allies for the Cartos for many years and doing a lot of unpaid work on their behalf. And here is why Elisabeth was angry at Joe—you will be astounded by this one (but maybe not, considering how Elisabeth thinks and operates) . . .
Elisabeth was mad at Joe because he had done some work, for a brief period, for a guy in Texas named Joe Foster. Foster had accidentally bounced a $600 check on a book order and it had nothing whatsoever to do with Joe Fields or his association with Foster. Now even though Foster made good on the check (and he had been a longtime big ticket book buyer) Elisabeth spent weeks haranguing over the subject. She even moved to have Willis fire our longtime accountant, Evangeline, because the accountant, a mild-mannered Filipino woman, refused to call OUR bank to tell them to call Foster’s bank and collect the debt from his account! Elisabeth even told Evangeline that she wasn’t being “loyal to the company” for refusing to do something that was totally contrary to banking procedure and perhaps even illegal!
When (under pressure from Elisabeth) Willis called Taras (a newly-hired young Ukrainian guy who was Evangeline’s assistant) to his office and asked Taras if he would be ready to step into Evangeline’s shoes « if she happened to leave the company, » the young man was so horrified that he turned in his two weeks notice shortly thereafter and quit his job. He told several AFP staffers about this at a going-away dinner party at the La Lomita restaurant on Pennsylvania Avenue.
And it should probably be mentioned that just a few years ago, AFP also terminated the contract of the aforementioned popular AFP writer, Mark Glenn—he’s the guy from Idaho who has come to my rescue and given me a place to live in his guest house—and Mark and his wife and TEN CHILDREN were left without a regular stipend. This was after Mark had given up a good-living as an independent landscaper and builder so that he could devote his time to WRITING THE TRUTH—something he loved to do.
Although I cannot say for certain that Elisabeth played a part in this, I know that after Mark’s departure Elisabeth had negative comments about Mark (not knowing that he and I had become good friends), justifying his abrupt dismissal “to save money.”
It truly never ended . . .
Some time in 2013 I went into the AFP office on a Saturday or Sunday and was surprised to find Willis and Elisabeth had come in. No problem. I had work to do—a lot of it—and they stayed out of my hair and I theirs.
However, Elisabeth cornered me and spent no less than 45 minutes talking non-stop (much to Willis’s apparent annoyance, by the way) largely condemning anything and everything about the way the AFP office was run and it quickly became apparent to me that her specific targets were Paul Angel and Chris Petherick. Those forty-five minutes distracted me from my work but it was another dose of this destructive woman.
Elisabeth has been so poisonous and ruinous in so many ways and Willis has either forgotten (legitimately) or he is so psychologically defensive about her madness that he will say literally anything to defend her.
At one point, shortly before I was fired for the first time in 2014, I reminded Willis (in the presence of Chris Petherick) that while Elisabeth wanted to slash my salary, she continued to insist on the preservation of the largely unnecessary (no, make that un-necessary) West Coast office for The BARNES REVIEW which was being subsidized to the tune of upwards of $900,000 a year, according to an analysis by Chris Petherick and Paul Angel who wanted to shut down that office.
But although Chris and Paul had repeatedly urged Willis to shut that office down, Elisabeth resisted (raising questions as to WHY she wanted to keep that office open). But when I made reference to this, Willis said—with a straight face—“I never knew that anyone had raised questions about this.” (suggesting this was something I had conjured up out of the blue). He actually said that right in front of Chris Petherick who had done the hands-on analysis that determined what a waste that office was!
In the summer of 2013—right when I was becoming disabled due to diabetic neuropathy—Elisabeth decided to strike against me (seeing that I was vulnerable). Willis Carto wrote a proposal to me that I leave Washington and “go back to Pennsylvania” (where I hadn’t lived for over 34 years) and that I would be kept on the AFP payroll at $1,000 a month. He actually said that this would be almost like a “raise” and somehow beneficial to me and said that I would not have the problem of having to come to the AFP office and it would lessen my “nervous condition.”
Well, first of all, having been forced out of the AFP office in 2003 (because of Elisabeth’s hatred for me), I was not even required to come to the office in the first place, “working at home.” (!) But I had no “nervous condition,” which suggests that I had some mental disability. No, I had PHYSICAL NERVE DAMAGE. That’s how much Carto even knew (or cared) about my condition.
(On one occasion, he did say, smiling, “You have diabetes,don’t you? Well, I have a needle and I can stick it in you and then you’ll feel better.” Yes, he said that.)
He backed off from that when the AFP editor, Chris Petherick, came to my defense, but I knew I was once again being targeted and this came at a time when I was under great physical and emotional stress because of my health problems and increasing pain and inability to walk. And in the fall of 2013, once again, I was informed that we were all facing major pay cuts, at a time when I actually needed a raise to pay for monthly health insurance that I badly needed. And then in February of 2014, I was informed that I was facing a massive pay cut.
Naturally, I objected, and Willis Carto asked me to write him a memo about my situation and I did that. A few weeks later, when the pay cut was levied, Willis—in his increasing forgetfulness—handed me back my original memo to him (he has a habit of misplacing documents, giving them to the wrong people, etc) and I discovered two “post-it” notes (in Elisabeth’s handwriting) attached to my memo. She had read my memo and then made comments to the effect that I was already being paid too much and even questioned whether I had done work (which I had) which was mentioned in that memo. So needless to say I was infuriated.
The next day—after having undergone an MRI of my neck and brain to see if that might be having an impact on my health—I called the Cartos at their home (after hours) and asked both of them to come on the line. I confronted Elisabeth about having seen her notes attacking me. She said, “Well, where are they?” I told her that they were at the AFP office (since I hadn’t brought them home with me). She responded, “Oh, they are at the office, huh?” (implying that they didn’t exist at all.)
She then suggested that they were forgeries. I asked, “Oh, so you are saying that I forged them? Why would I do that?” She responded, “Why would you?” I said, “Well, do you think that I did forge them?” She responded, “Well, maybe one of your friends did.” (Seriously, this was the nature of the “discussion.”)
I said, “Well, if somebody is forging documents, maybe we should get the FBI to come in to investigate if this is forgery or not and find out who did it.” I wasn’t serious, of course, but I realized I was having a no-win discussion with this woman.
Here’s what she said in response: “Oh, you want the FBI to come in, huh? Well, you’re a dirty old queer and a nigger lover and we’ll put that all over the Internet. How would you like THAT?” she challenged.
I laughed: Accusations like that had been already put on the Internet, including one that I had a Jewish lover (an agent of the ADL) whom I supposedly walked hand-in-hand with down Pennsylvania Avenue (!) and that I had a black crack addict homosexual lover, who was surprised to learn (when I told him) that we had been accused of such a relationship.
In fact, this black guy (a familiar figure on the streets of Capitol Hill) is friends with a number of people at AFP, even today, was recruited to work odd-jobs for the old SPOTLIGHT by Julia Foster and used to picket the Holocaust Museum with Dr. Robert Brock, the black nationalist. And I also happen to be the godfather of this guy’s son!
But Elisabeth Carto was vowing to try to smear me with that claim. And what makes it all the more interesting is that the story started with a weird former employee of The SPOTLIGHT and was repeated by another AFP employee—a former Carto friend—who himself later told people that Elisabeth Carto had a sexual interest in HIM!
However, as we’ve seen, Elisabeth and her sister, Marianne Scharnhost have an odd proclivity for slinging around strange sexual allegations—such as the malicious claim about Trisha Katson—and are just generally salacious.
In any event, the “discussion” with Elisabeth deteriorated with her in the background shrieking and ranting and then, if I recall, she hung up.
The next day I was fired—but then quickly “rehired,” but only after being out of work for six weeks with no pay (during which time I was rushed in for emergency heart surgery).
The new “contract” I agreed to involved a substantial pay cut, but at least I had a job, but it became apparent to me that Willis Carto (still under pressure from his wife) was eagerly looking for an excuse to terminate that contract. And after I challenged him about his wife’s behavior and her continuing antics at the AFP office and toward other AFP employees, he chose to terminate my contract: HE FIRED ME AGAIN!
Elisabeth had finally gotten rid of me—and Willis (no matter how much he wanted to keep me on board) was unable to stand up to her.
Willis has announced his third “resignation” from AFP—the third in as many years—but Elisabeth’s behavior has already financially crippled the company in many ways, even including—for several months—shutting down the book-selling department, and I told Willis Carto after my latest firing that he was making an enemy of me. But he claimed that my status was all up to “the board of directors.”
That’s the greatest irony because—back in 2003—when Elisabeth was moving against me (and Willis was going along with her intrigues) I actually had the legal power—as AFP treasurer, in CONTROL OF THE BANK ACCOUNT, and as one of the majority stockholders to LEGALLY OUST WILLIS AND ELISABETH CARTO.
And I did not do so, even though they were working against me.
That’s right. I could have seized control of the company and thrown the Cartos out, but despite everything I did not do so.
Instead, I voluntarily turned in my resignation from the board of directors. I frankly did not want to be part of a “front” organization for this insane woman and her collaborating husband who would dare to do this kind of thing to me, even in the face of the actual legal authority that I had.
(And by the way, elsewhere, I have a 19-page memorandum, drafted in 2003, which I have already widely circulated, which describes the details of 2003. So this is not anything “new” and many people are already aware of it. It’s just too long, obviously, to include here, but if you are interested in seeing it, please let me know and I will send you a copy when I get the chance.)
You see, Elisabeth has run rough-shod over ALL of the key people associated with AFP and Michael Collins Piper is not the only victim, but I have been a PRIME target for many, many years.
So, the bottom line is this: if Michael Collins Piper is as rotten and filthy and disgusting as Elisabeth Carto and her sister have long contended (a view that Willis Carto, in his slide into dementia, seems to concur with), it seems that practically the entirety of the staff of AFP fall into that category as well.
And you might naturally ask: Well, if they were so bad, why did you prominently mention Willis and Elisabeth in the acknowledgments in your books?
Good question—-and that is a bizarre story in and of itself. You see, back in December of 2002 when Elisabeth was pushing hard to have me fired and virtually every day for about two weeks I was being called into Willis’s office to answer to or explain away some question he had for me (obviously instigated by Elisabeth)—and this is all detailed in the aforementioned 19 page memorandum—Willis once asked me this: “Why don’t you mention me in your big book FINAL JUDGMENT?”
I was surprised by this totally unexpected question, nearly 10 years after the book came out, but I knew Elisabeth had something to do with it.” Willis had the book in his hand, and he said, “You mention all these other people, but you don’t thank me.”
I took the book from him and showed him that ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE I made the point of thanking Willis and Liberty Lobby’s attorney Mark Lane and pointed out that if it hadn’t been for their support, the book never would have been possible.
You see, Elisabeth had looked through the book and MISSED that and then told Willis that I had not mentioned him!
That’s the kind of sinister person she is.
Well, years went by and about five years ago, Willis again asked me the same question (probably having again been prodded, for some reason, by Elisabeth) —-I think perhaps because I maybe had not thanked him in one of my other books, perhaps THE GOLEM or TARGET TRAFICANT —-and I again showed him where he WAS mentioned up front in FINAL JUDGMENT. And I said to him, “You need to show this to Elisabeth so that she doesn’t get you to ask me this question again.” He laughed, more or less acknowledging that Elisabeth was indeed the instigator.
So, after that, when I ultimately published four of my own books and sold them directly from my Washington PO Box rather than through AFP, I made a LOUD point of thanking Willis AND ELISABETH quite directly and RIGHT UP FRONT.
Does that answer your question?
And you might be interested in knowing WHY Willis did not publish my book THE CONFESSIONS OF AN ANTI-SEMITE (the first of the four books I published myself). He said, “Well, it’s too fucking long and I ain’t gonna publish it.” That was his way of showing me that he was the boss and that he had the final say, etc, and that I was dependent on him, that I was nobody without him. So I decided to publish it myself.
So when he found that I was going to publish it myself, he asked to write an introduction (which I included)! He wanted to be in on the action.
And I will tell you this, quite frankly: a few years ago Willis suggested I write a book about Adolf Hitler and I said, “Yes, I’m actually thinking of doing that.” He said, “Well, you’re the man to do it.” I dictated over 40 hours of notes and documentation into a tape recorder while on vacation and set it aside to finish some of my other books.
In the meantime, having forgotten that he asked me to do such a book, Willis decided to do his own little pamphlet on the subject of Hitler (and the final product is actually a pretty good little work. Willis spent a great deal of money and time promoting his pamphlet (certainly his right to do) and yet even Elisabeth stood in the way of that project—I kid you not.
The project was delayed, time and again, for months, because Elisabeth kept interfering. At one point it was going to be a special issue of THE BARNES REVIEW, and then a pamphlet, and then a special issue again. Then Willis decided that he wanted a full length book, incorporating his essay and supplemented with a lot of other material from THE BARNES REVIEW. I was asked to put the material together and I spent quite a bit of time doing so. But all of this time, Elisabeth was interfering and it became almost of an in-office joke. Poor Paul Angel, the talented production chief in charge of putting our books and the newspaper and magazines together, was virtually being turned into a full-time employee doing and re-doing Willis’s Hitler project!
And yes, it finally came out as a very good little essay in pamphlet form. But behind the scenes Elisabeth had made production of that pamphlet an exercise in absolute chaos.
Do you REALLY think that these are—as Elisabeth Carto would say—“all lies”?
She says everybody is a “liar” or a “creep” but those are two words that aptly apply to her.
Judge for yourself.
What’s the old saying about lying down with dogs with fleas? Though I hate to use that analogy that is libelous to our four-legged friends.
Thanks again to those of you for your support.
It’s much appreciated.
Whether the Cartos like it or not, I’m going to continue to tell the truth!
Michael Collins Piper
Émissions de radio: audios et vidéos
VIDEO – L’AUTRE MONDE – JFK – La piste Ben Gourion – Un des points oubliés par Oliver Stone dans son Film (dec. 2013), à la mémoire de Michael Collins Piper qui fut le premier à rassembler les morceaux du casse-tête et à révéler qui a tué JFK.
Many people pretend to have read my book when they are knocking it down, and some even call me a « racist » not realizing that the introduction to the book was written by Dr. Robert L. Brock, the veteran African-American civil rights activist who is widely known as « the reparations man, » having been the grandfather of the modern-day movement for reparations for American descendants of persons who were taken captive in the trans-Atlantic African slave trade!
It was only well after my book was first published that I learned that veteran JFK researcher Penn Jones (the so-called « grand old man » of the researchers ») had written back in the 1970s, not once, but twice, that looking in the direction of Israel’s intelligence service in exploring the JFK assassination conspiracy appeared to be quite reasonable — a point that most of my critics are probably unaware of and will be hard-pressed to explain away, without perhaps labeling Penn Jones as I have been labeled.
I should note that I have worked closely over the years with attorney Mark Lane, author of RUSH TO JUDGMENT, A CITIZEN’S DISSENT, and PLAUSIBLE DENIAL, the latter book being the volume that describes CIA man E. Howard Hunt’s lawsuit against Liberty Lobby, the institution which employed me from 1980 through 2001.
Through my association with Liberty Lobby I not only came to know Mark quite well — and have been a guest in his home many times — but I also became well acquainted with a number of individuals who have been, in one fashion or another, become intimately connected to circumstances surrounding the JFK assassination, the anti-Castro Cuban movement, etc.
Among them: Victor Marchetti, author of THE CIA AND THE CULT OF INTELLIGENCE, the late Time-Life correspondent Andrew St. George, whose work is known to anyone with any serious knowledge of the Cuban Revolution and the CIA’s activities in the region (Andrew being a close pal of Frank Sturgis, and, at one time, Fidel himself), and the late Fletcher Prouty.
Actually, I’m being modest here. The truth is that Mark Lane, Victor Marchetti and Andrew St. George have not just been business associates. They’ve been good friends — and all of them very valued friends, in more ways than one.
My book has sold just under 50,000 copies, both here and abroad, which is considerably more than perhaps MOST of the other books on the JFK assassination and although the false legend has it that I am a « celebrated speaker » at so-called « neo-Nazi » and « KKK events » the truth is that my largest audiences have been abroad in such places as Malaysia and Japan where hardly a « neo-Nazi » or « KKKer » is to be found.
My critics contend that I focus on the issue of Israel in my writings. I am proud to say that is precisely correct. Having seen my own older brother ravaged by his service during the Vietnam War, I became — as a teenager — a foe of needless foreign wars and in watching all-out U.S. support for Israel, I predicted more than 25 years ago that the United States would get bogged down in the Middle East and ultimately subjected to a terrorist attack relating to U.S. involvement in the Middle East.
I am a determined critic of U.S. support for Israel and have been proud to share friendship with a number of other outspoken critics of U.S. support for Israel including the aforementioned Mark Lane, Dr. Alfred Lilienthal, and the late Haviv Schieber (who served as the first mayor of Beersheba in Palestine—before the founding of Israel—near where Israel’s officially non-existent nuclear weapons plant at Dimona is located).
And — guess what — all of the aforementioned happen to be Jewish (but they’ve been called « anti-Semitic » by the Anti-Defamation League and other elements of the Israeli lobby.)
The truth is that if I didn’t have the wide-ranging background and knowledge about Israel — coupled with no hesitation in daring to explore areas (involving Israel) that other JFK « researchers » are fearful of exploring — I would have never been able to write FINAL JUDGMENT in the first place.
I have no official website on my own, but — as my critics well know — it is possible to do a search of « Michael Collins Piper » on google and find all sorts of stuff about me, both pro- and con.
Although my critics — many of whom are rather disingenuous, to say the least — like to suggest that only « Nazis » promote my works, serious open-minded researchers will find that my writings have been featured on a wide variety of venues and endorsed by progressive-minded folks of all races, creeds and colors.
I write regularly for American Free Press, which has a website at americanfreepress.net and also The Barnes Review which has a website at barnesreview.org.
Needless to say, I don’t agree with everything that appears in these publications nor, necessarily do other writers for these publications agree with what I write. But there’s something called « freedom of expression » that a lot of my critics do not understand. And as anyone who has ever dared to touch on the topic of Israel and its power in official Washington knows well, topics relating to anything to do with Israel and related issues are considered « special » and, in some respects, beyond discussion. (…)
Final Judgment : The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy de l’Américain Michael Collins Piper, démontre que le responsable de l’assassinat de JFK est le Mossad (Israel), aidé du crime organisé juif (Lansky-Bloomfield-Permindex) et de la CIA sous contrôle d’Angleton (loyaliste d’Israel).
C’est un best seller underground aux USA, et la Bible des investigateurs de la mafia juive. La bombe nucléaire israélienne était au coeur du litige opposant les Kennedy et Israel. Par le fait même, le livre décortique les rouages de la grande mafia juive.
À propos de Henry Makow:
Fish Swim, Birds Fly–The Case of Henry Makow and the untimely death of Michael Collins Piper
Ed note, Mark Glenn–It is against my stronger (and I hope better) instincts to engage in this, given that in similar past encounters I have seen personally how counterproductive and what a waste of time, energy, and mental resources it all is, but due both to the correspondence I have received on this issue as well as the fact that there are important items associated with this that play a role in the ‘bigger picture’ for everyone (involved or not) I have decided to weigh in on it.
Several years ago, in a phone conversation I had with Henry Makow, he told me that recently he had found himself ‘in trouble’ with the Canadian authorities because of the material he posts on his website, but that an ‘arrangement’ had been made that resulted in him ‘dodging the bullet’.
To his great relief, he had miraculously escaped the same kind of treatment that others such as Arthur Topham et al regularly receive whole hog whenever they dare to speak out on certain ‘forbidden’ topics involving ‘them’, and we all know who we’re talking about here.
I did not think anything of it, other than sharing in Henry’s sense of relief, as I know how nasty ‘they’ can be whenever someone says something ‘they’ don’t like, and especially when ‘they’ are in bed with a government they control and whom ‘they’ can utilize in prosecuting (persecuting) those who dare to speak the truth about ‘their’ activities.
The reason I didn’t think anything of the ‘arrangement’ mentioned by Henry was because I had no doubts, mistrust, or misgivings about him. In the various extended conversations I had had with him previous to this, I perceived him to be a ‘former’ Jew, meaning someone who had been brought up in the ‘Jewish thing’ but who had made the ‘great leap’ into the freedom of Gentiledom and thus had disassociated and divorced himself from any and all attachments to his previous status as a ‘Jew’.
The other reason I had no doubts or mistrust about him is that I am not (yet) and have never been a big believer in the kind of ‘genetic determinism’ that seems to predominate within certain circles these days. I am more a believer in human free will, which says that people can make the choice whether they want to live as human beings or as animals.
Therefore, when Henry exhibited to me all the admirable and honorable characteristics of having detoxified himself of his Judaism, I took him at his word and took the whole thing at face value.
What struck me was not just his opposition to Zionism (which, let’s be honest, has become something of a fad and a fashionable thing these days amongst ‘good Jews’ who either for reasons of public consumption or because they (might, maybe possibly, hopefully, who knows) feel some twinge of conscience over what their cousins in Israel and beyond have done to the innocent peoples in the Middle East) but as well his opposition to Judaism which he characterized as evil and satanic. We had exchanged emails in the past where he had praised my stance vis a vis Judaism being the sparkplug of Zionist violence and echoed my position that in any honest discussion or examination of current events, one cannot simply condemn ‘Zionism’ while leaving the dreaded ‘J’ word–Judaism–untouched.
It was also during these many-years-ago phone conversations that (if memory serves me right and my apologies if I have remembered something wrong) Henry told me he had lived in Israel for sometime and (again, if memory serves me right and my apologies if I have remembered something wrong) he said he had fought briefly as a member of the IDF in one of the wars.
I found this to be an even bigger reason to celebrate his ‘J-liberation’, given the fact that he had indeed ‘walked the walk’ rather than just ‘talked the talk’. In terms of being ‘Jewish’, you can’t get much more Jewish than making aliyah and taking part in one of Israel’s religiously-mandated bloodbaths.
Fast forward from that point to a few years later when I had the now-infamous war of words and ideas with the lunatic Jeff Rense over his posting Neo-Con friendly/anti-Islamic articles on his website and the manner in which he reacted when I told him that if he chose to continue doing this, I would no longer support him as a ‘truther’ and would let everyone within my modest circle of readers know that he was not a source to be trusted.
His response was to personally threaten me over the phone to have agents from both the FBI and DHS visit my home for a little ‘chat’, a plan about which I was originally made aware by David Duke in a previous phone call who was trying to ‘smooth things over’ between us.
I decided in the aftermath of Rense’s threats to make the particulars of this little discussion known, as I believe people who are on the path to finding the truth do indeed have a ‘consumers bill of rights’ and thus, based upon a ‘need to know basis’ do indeed need to know just what kind of product they are consuming.
Once the news of Rense’s threats became known and what were the inevitable and predictable results thereof, he became completely unhinged and unglued, behaving like some feral animal, snapping and snarling in all directions and in the desperate attempt at making everyone forget about what he had done in making these threats to me personally, attempted instead to change the focus of the discussion to how I must be either a secret Mossad or CIA agent who was out to get him killed. He commissioned various people whose ‘careers’ as ‘truthers’ he had helped prop up with his website to write hit pieces on me, dragging my wife and children into the discussion and, as I said, attempted to change the topic of discussion from how Jeff Rense threatened to send los federales to my home to instead how the Christ-figure Jeff Rense was being set up to be crucified and killed in an elaborate and convoluted Mossad/CIA plot to eliminate the most important gear in the ‘truth movement’ machinery.
To my great surprise, Henry Makow was one of those who rushed to Rense’s ‘defense’. Without consulting me to get ‘my side’ of the story, he cobbled together his own take on the event based solely on what Rense personally related to him, reinforcing the ‘Jeff Rense as persecuted Christ-figure’ narrative, adding his own bandages and salve to Rense’s bruised ego and to the self-inflicted wounds Rense himself brought upon his own damaged reputation.
Fast forward again a few years from that event to the manner in which Henry Makow then found himself in the very same cyclone of consternation and conflict with Mr. Hairdo himself, Jeff Rense. I don’t remember what the particulars of that conflict were, but suffice it to say that Rense engaged in the very same smear tactics against Henry that he had previously used against me who was very unconvincingly painted as the dangerous Mossad/CIA assassin out to eliminate the most important figure in the ‘anti-Zionist’ movement.
To my surprise, a short time after this took place, I got an email from Henry apologising for what he had written about me in the previous brouhaha and for rushing to Rense’s defense, saying (again, if memory serves me right) ‘I was misled’.
I accepted his apology (foolishly) and in good Gentile fashion, told him not to give it another thought. As an added measure, the piece had written about Henry’s involvement I removed from the TUT website.
In the coming years Henry would send me pieces he had written asking if I would mind posting them, always prefacing them in the subject line of the accompanying email with ‘Mark, Here’s one for you and for TUT’.
Those that I felt ‘made muster’ in terms of the mission and direction in which I try to steer TUT were indeed published, and not without me receiving a measurable amount of grief from the readers, who insisted to me that Henry ‘was a Jew’ and a ‘disinfo agent’ out to cause trouble. In their estimation of him, since he peddled Holocaustianity and tried to downplay or confuse otherwise clear and concise Judaic intrigue with words such as ‘the Illuminati’ and ‘Luciferiansm’, etc, the red flags raised in their minds was that he was a pretender and not to be trusted.
In the midst of these accusations against Henry, I always defended him and reminded his detractors that not everyone can be as up to speed as everyone else, that it takes time for a mind that has only recently ‘come into the light’ to thaw out after decades of being frozen and incapacitated by the ice-cold protocols of Jewish thinking and that he deserved to be given some time in playing ‘catch up’ with the rest of the enlightened world.
Interestingly enough, Mike Piper was one of those who made this claim about him and despite my various attempts at defending Henry, Mike did not alter his views, including in subsequent discussions that took place in subsequent years where Henry’s name came up.
Fast forward again to just a few months ago, where Henry sent me the link to a piece he posted on his website where he had taken the ‘ed notes’ commentary from a piece I published on TUT dealing with the genocidal teachings contained within the Jewish Torah (Old Testament) and around which he had framed an independent article with his own thoughts and perspective. Had he not sent me the link to it I would never have known it was there as I do not visit his website unless and until he sends me something personally.
The usual firestorm erupted with many of Henry’s readers who reacted emotionally and irrationally to what had been written as they–in almost unanimous fashion–adopted the ‘company line’ vis a vis the Torah (Old Testament) as being the ‘word of God’ and thus how my view of it was blasphemous, heretical and everything in between.
One of those proffering this view was one Tony Blizzard.
I only knew/know of Blizzard based upon the dozen or so passing references which Mike Piper made about him over the 10 years he and I worked together closely. In Mike’s references to him, he always spoke affectionately and laughingly of him up until shortly before Mike’s passing, where he expressed his clear dismay and disappointment that Blizzard had become a full fledged ‘Sandy Hook Hoaxer’ and what a waste of an otherwise good mind it all was.
A few days after the posting on Henry’s site dealing with my take on the Old Testament and all the fire and fury that erupted thereof, I received an email from Henry telling me that he had to take the piece in question down because his ‘Jewish’ wife as he described her (his 3rd, if memory serves me correctly) ‘was very offended by it’. He also told me that she was his webmaster and did not like the various things I have said about Judaism and the Torah.
I told him it was fine, no problem, that it was his website to do with in whatever manner he saw fit, no explanations necessary, and apologized that what I had said had become an issue of contention between him and his ‘better’ half.
I bade him well, as I always do in any exchange with someone I view as a friend and colleague.
Fast forward yet again to Nov. 20, 2017, when I received an email from Henry with a link to his most recent piece entitled– ‘Foul play in the death of Michael Collins Piper?’
This was not the first time I had run into this ‘theory’ concerning Mike’s passing. Predictably and understandably, given who Mike was, what he had done for almost 4 decades of his life and the well-deserved prominence and respect he had received as a result thereof, from the beginning of his death various theories swirled ‘round about the circumstances and with all the usual trappings–Mossad. CIA. Suspicious. Assassination. Israel Killed him. Willis Carto killed him. AFP killed him.
Etc, etc, etc.
And were it not for the fact that I was intimately involved in the last years/months of Mike’s life, both as his friend and as his ‘landlord’ after he moved in with us after being fired from AFP, I am sure I would have had questions myself about the circumstances of his passing.
However, being as ‘close to the center’ as I was on these things, watching the slow-motion meltdown that took place between him and his long time employer Willis Carto, to his life-threatening health problems, I had a much better perspective on these events than the average ‘truther’ who as a general rule is more apt to surrender him/herself to whatever whims happen to be flitting and floating around upstairs at any given moment rather than the cold, hard facts.
I opened the link Henry sent to find a cobbled-together, rambling, mishmash montage, the only source of which was (I presume to be) an email or some other correspondence from the same aforementioned Tony Blizzard and his ‘suspicions’ about Mike’s passing, and all of them leading back to yours truly. My defense of Islam and my denial of the Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracy (which Blizzard believes whole hog as a matter of irrefutable dogma) featured prominently, as well as Blizzard’s thesis that somehow I had ‘got control’ of Mike’s mind and had ‘turned him’ into a creature of my own making.
As in the previous case involving Henry’s hitpiece on me during the Jeff Rense debacle, not once did he contact me for any information involving Mike’s death, as any responsible investigative journalist would have.
This in and of itself is important, given that if someone wanted to find out more about what had actually transpired, I would be the person to go to. Mike lived the last 6 months of his life with us. We housed him, fed him, did his laundry, took him to his various appointments with doctors and lawyers (for his disability claims case) etc. We brought his firewood up to him everyday and loaded the wood stove for him. We emptied the litter box for his cat. The kids came over every day to cheer him up. I (as well as my wife at times, and particularly when I was in Iran) took him to do his grocery or even just out to lunch, either at Shari’s in CdA or the White House in Post Falls–his favorite restaurants here in North Idaho–just to get him ‘out of the house’ so that he wasn’t so miserable.
And yet, despite our very intimate, first person, up-close-and personal involvement in the events leading right up to Mike’s death, I was not contacted for this piece of ‘investgatory journalism’ on the part of Henry Makow.
Had Henry bothered to adhere to the rules of responsible investigative journalism rather than just relying upon some rambling, barely-coherent email from the aforementioned Tony Blizzard who stated plainly (and which Makow actually had the TEMERITY–one of Mike’s favorite words he used often and which I have now adopted) to reprint in his now-infamous ‘article’ that ‘His (Mike’s) death confirmed my suspicions although I have not one single fact to back them up’, then Henry would have learned some really interesting things that would have fleshed out much better whatever thesis he was pursuing concerning what happened to Mike, including the direct role that people of the Tony Blizzard template (The Sandy Hook Hoax crowd) played in getting Mike fired from AFP. He would have learned of the daily battle (s) that took place at AFP for over a year between Mike and the ‘hoaxer’ crowd there who wanted to go front page on every issue with the various catechitical positions of the cult religion known as Sandy Hook Hoaxerism that ‘no shooting took place’ and that ‘no one died’ as Mike tried in vain to warn against such irresponsible (and potentially legally actionable) ‘journalism’. Henry would have learned that in the midst of all of this, one of AFP’s largest benefactors (who had contributed money to AFP in the 5-figure range yearly for many years) explicitly told Willis Carto that if Mike remained there that no more money would be forthcoming.
Yes, that’s right, the Sandy Hook Hoax crowd (which included Blizzard) led to Mike losing his job and thus him being forced to relocate 3,000 miles away in the immediate aftermath of his quintuple bypass surgery, the complications of which–according to the conclusions of the medical examiner who oversaw Mike’s case–were the cause of his death.
So what we obviously have here is–at best–irresponsible and lazy ‘journalism’ on the part of Henry Makow, ‘Ph.D’.
At worst, what he is doing is to engage (again) in a deliberate form of attempted character assassination that, in this day and age and with all the nutcases running around out there, could result in very real, tangible events taking place where people can be harmed and where legal action can (and will) ensue.
After reading over this cobbled together mishmash, I sent the following email to Henry which–a full 2 days later–has elicited no response from him whatsoever–
‘Henry, I have defended you for years against those who claimed (and continue to claim) that you are a disinfo agent, including (as coincidental as it may sound in this context) Mike Piper himself, who was convinced you were placed conspicuously in our midst by ‘them’ for reasons of distraction and diversion. I still maintain this to be the case, that you are not some deliberate disinfo agent but rather have difficulty in discerning between fact and fiction when it comes to certain ‘hot button’ issues that are discussed within the ‘movement’.
This does not change the fact however that just because you don’t deliberately do damage that somehow you are detached and disassociated from causing problems, this latest business on your website dealing with Mike’s passing and the mad rantings of Tony Blizzard being a prime example.
For the record, here is a ‘bird’s eye view’ of the items listed in Tony Blizzard’s blizzard of nonsense–
Mike’s position on Sandy Hook, Boston, etc, were Mike’s. Anyone who knew Mike knew that he had an indomitable intellect and could not be convinced of anything which he himself did not believe to be true. As he liked to describe himself, he was a ‘stickler for details’ and had NO patience whatsoever for sloppy theorizing and speculation.
Blizzard and others who are bothered by this and seek some ‘conspiracy’ in understanding and explaining Mike’s take on SH, Boston, etc, do nothing more than make fools of themselves in doing so, because, after all, what they are expecting us all to believe is that Mike–clearly the brightest mind this ‘movement’ ever produced who singularly decoded and uncovered the whosits and whatsits of the JFK assassination (and other events) was somehow unable to ‘see’ what people such as Blizzard & co have convinced themselves was the case.
By the way, as a friend, Mike thought very highly of Tony Blizzard but thought his views on Sandy Hook et al were insane and was more than a little bothered that someone whose intellect he had always respected could have gotten so completely detached from reality as to become a full fledged ‘hoaxer’.
Next, how Blizzard would somehow associate Mike’s favorable ideas concerning Islam with me (a Christian and not a muslim, but who has gone to great lengths in explaining to people just how they are being lied to by Jewish interests concerning what Islam teaches) leaves me bewildered, in addition to what Blizzard asserts are the directives in the ‘Koran’ referring to Christians as ‘infidels’ who deserve to be killed.
He is delusional and if he can’t get this one right–what the Qu’ran actually says–when all it takes is a mere 5 minutes of reading then why anyone would give such an ‘investigator’ a place of honor on their website to peddle his latest ‘theories’ concerning Mike’s death would lead me to question their sanity as well.
Next, Mike did not ‘choose’ to come and live with us–he had no other choice other than to die on the streets of DC. He had an estranged relationship with his brother–the only ‘family’ he had, and the only other person (of which I am aware) who offered Mike a home was Nashid Abdul Khalliq who had rental properties in Texas and offered one to Mike rent free for life, which Mike did refuse on the basis that he needed help getting around and didn’t know anyone in Houston where these rental properties were. And while it is possible Mike was offered to come and live with Blizzard, he made no mention of it to me that I can recall.
Next, my ‘guest house’, as Blizzard referred to it (and just why he would put that in quotation marks as if it didn’t exist I can’t even begin to imagine. I guess it must be a ‘hoax’ as well) did not ‘burn down’, a little discrepancy that reveals just how detached from the facts Blizzard (and hence his theories and conclusions) are. The roof caught fire, burned along the entire length of the house, (roughly 34 feet and a good 4 feet down the rafters to the collar ties) and did substantial structural damage that necessitated Mike going to a hotel for safety reasons. The ‘railing on the porch’ as Blizzard put it was not ‘sabotaged’ and the proof of this is that there WASN’T ANY RAILING. A section of the porch did collapse under Mike’s weight as he stepped on it, hurting the shin of his right leg considerably, but 15 minutes later when I asked MIke if he wanted to go to the hospital he said no, that the pain was subsiding, which amazed me, given as much pain as he was constantly in and how much worse it had to have been after he scraped his legs. The reason the floor collapsed is that it was a new porch built with old wood right before Mike arrived, had 3 feet of snow sitting on it throughout the months of december, january, february, and march and afterwards was subjected to months of rain which weakened the wood and thus collapsed in one section when Mike stepped on it. I know Mike thought it was sabotaged, but the person to blame for this was me, the guy who used old wood in building it and who did not put a roof over it as I was in a rush to get the living quarters themselves in order for Mike before he arrived.
One part Blizzard did manage to get right was Mike being upbeat before he died. He had gotten himself into a new apartment in the old part of CdA that was considerably more comfortable than our (hoax) ‘guest’ house and indeed he was getting ready to start writing again. The topic he planned on ‘exposing’ dealt Willis and Elizabeth Carto and the dealings they had had with others over the years, how they had screwed various people over (just as they had Mike) and what he believed to be criminal activity on their part in hiding money from both the government and the readers/subscribers to AFP and TBR. Before Mike left DC and came out here, he wrote everything down and sent it to me (a 20+ page document) detailing what had been done to him by them and asked that I go public with it when/if he ever died.
I still have the papers but due to the fact that what they represented to me were just the bitter words of a man who had been stabbed in the back by the people to whom he had given 34 years of his life, I saw no point in opening yet another ugly chapter in all of this that would have caused even more heartache for everyone in the aftermath of his passing and thus just put the papers away, to say nothing of the manner that they would have made Mike appear when he was not in the position to defend himself.
Next I suppose that Blizzard will allege that there is something ‘fishy’ about me not releasing the papers, a charge to which–if indeed it were to come forth–my response would be that he can take a running jump straight into hell, something Mike used to say quite often.
Next–Blizzard’s assertion that there is an ‘exaggeration’ in my description of how bad-off Mike was physically. What absolute, unbridled idiocy on his part. Was Mike’s 98% blockage in his arteries a fabrication or exaggeration? How about his quintuple bypass surgery–an exaggeration as well? How about the fact that there were complications during Mike’s procedure where he almost died, or the various heart-related episodes he had here during his 6 month stay that required me personally taking him to the emergency room, on several occasions–Exaggerations? Fabrications? On this issue alone, Blizzard’s assertion that these are ‘exaggerations’ indicate that Mike’s original concerns that Blizzard had gone insane were/are well-founded.
As far as the meds Mike took ‘for pain’, I know he took Lyrica for a short while prior to coming out here but he told me it did him no good and he said he didn’t like the way it made him feel loopy and disconnected, so Blizzard’s theory concerning Mike being ‘delusional’ because of drugs is a non-starter as well.
Henry, you used to be one of the sharpest knives in the drawer and a gifted intellectual, so for the life of me, I can’t even begin to imagine why you would waste good web space on something like this other than it possibly causes your conspiracy funny bone to tingle and therefore you feel the need to ‘pass the bottle around’ to everyone else, making you in substance no different from the self-admitted lunatic Gordon Duff who proudly asserts that nearly half of the material he posts on VT is–in his own words– ‘deliberate disinformation.’
Goodbye Henry, have a good life
As I said, a full 2 days later and I/we are yet to receive a response from Henry Makow, ‘Ph.D’ explaining why he would engage in this type of deliberate, libelous, slanderous calumny by intimating that I/we had something to do with Mike’s passing and using as ‘evidence’ of his thesis some email from a for-the-most-part unknown entity going by the name of Tony Blizzard with a self-professed hatred for Muslims and a love affair with the Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracy theory.
And therefore, here are my/our questions, all of which are reasonable, fair, and rational, given what we know about how things work these days when it comes to ‘them’–
1. When the Canadian Jewish Congress brought charges against Henry for racial incitement (or whatever the specific charge was) what was the ‘arrangement’ which was devised whereby he escaped the kind of punishment that is normally meted out to those who fall into ‘their’ clutches for having said things which ‘they’ don’t like? Did he agree to continue on with the ‘Illuminati/Luciferian/Holocaustianity’ schtick, a confusing and diversionary form of discussion (as Mike Piper described it) that appears to say certain things but in the end functions like a broken clock which is only right twice a day? Did he agree to share email correspondences taking place between him and the readers of his website with other ‘3rd parties’ on the ‘other side’ so that ‘they’ could get a bird’s eye view of just ‘who was who’ and ‘what was what’?
2. The issue involving (in his own words to me) his ‘Jewish’ wife and the fact that she took/takes great umbrage at any critical examination/discussion of Judaism–Is the recent business involving Henry Makow, ‘Ph.D’ and his engaging in a libel/slander campaign against me, intimating that I may have had a hand in the death of Mike Piper, using as ‘evidentiary proof’ of his ‘thesis’ Tony Blizzard’s blinding blizzard of bilious bullshit something done to appease his ‘better half,’ a case of ‘a happy wife is a happy life’?
Or–as much as I personally hate to even consider the possibility–is it just a simple case of a Jew behaving like a Jew and engaging in what ‘they’ do best, which is lying, slander, and character assassination?
Henry makes clear in a piece he wrote entitled ‘Why Do I Remain Jewish?’ something very important for everyone to consider, not just in terms of his ‘journalistic’ activities taking place in the here and now, but as well vis what he chooses to do in the days, weeks, months, or years to come, to wit–
‘Why Do I Remain Jewish? The short answer is I have no choice. You can’t jump out of your skin.’
And so, even though he describes himself as an ‘assimilated Jew’, what he is in effect saying is that he is a Jew first, which means that he is going to do what a Jew is expected to do for his people since his ‘Jewish skin’ is something from which he is neither able to separate himself nor out of which is he able to ‘jump’.
For me personally, it has been a serious wake-up call as to the nature of the ‘company’ I keep and why perhaps the entire ‘genetic determinism’ issue is something I perhaps need to revisit and reconsider. Maybe, as I often hear from people (and indeed as I DID hear from people for years who told me not to trust Henry Makow) ‘a Jew is a Jew and a leopard does not change its spots.’
What I do know for a fact however, based upon Makow’s own behavior, is that those who do identify as Jews can/will only go so far in their ‘J-liberation’ and that whatever pretenses they may make about being ‘cured’, that like a continually-recurring and incurable case of herpes, it is just a matter of time before a ‘break-out’ occurs again, because, as we all witness on a daily basis, both in watching world events as well as in our own dealings with ‘them’ personally, almost as much as if it were governed by the rules of gravity–fish swim, birds fly, and Jews lie.
Mark Glenn, Nov. 22, 2017
À propos de Gordon Duff:
L’article devient intéressant dans sa seconde partie (page 9). L’encadré biographique dédié à Piper est somme toute pas très intéressant…Il se base sur l’opinion de Gordon Duff qui tente de se faire passer pour un de ses amis! Or il est facile de vérifier que Duff et Piper n’ont jamais été amis! Piper était un ami très proche de Mark Glenn. Glenn a dû déclarer la guerre aux niais qui suivent Duff et qui spéculent sur la mort de Piper sans avancer quoi que ce soit de sérieux. Duff est un enfumeur professionnel, c’est pourquoi les crétins d’E-R propagent à tous vents les « articles » de VT traduits en français et moussent sa réputation. Duff a été répudié par presque tous ses anciens collaborateurs qui ont passé quelque temps aux côtés de lui à VT! Duff est un malade mental, un paranoïaque, qui affirme même avoir des connexions en haut lieu, dans les services secrets du Mossad, et il réfère souvent à leur autorité pour se donner lui-même un semblant de sérieux, de crédibilité. Duff a été l’un des premiers à propager les bobards sur Sandy Hook, d’abord en diffusant des articles disant que c’était « un coup du Mossad », puis disant que « tout était faux à Sandy Hook », que « les victimes et les familles de victimes n’ont jamais existé ». À partir de là, au moment fort de la controverse de Sandy Hook en 2012-2013, Piper et Glenn, qui se méfiaient déjà de Duff depuis longtemps, ont commencé à dénoncer publiquement Duff comme étant un enfumeur, un énergumène, pas fiable du tout.
I have been asked now by a few people what my response is to the latest ‘theories’ concerning Mike having been murdered, so here it goes–
The speculation that Mike was ‘murdered’ originated with Gordon Duff, a lunatic in his own right, who has based such speculation on no facts whatsoever other than that–
a. Mike is an exceptional and outspoken critic of Israel, and
b. that he died.
THIS is the pool of ‘evidence’ that Duff (who once stated live on a radio program that ‘40% of the material posted on his website Veterans Today is deliberately false) uses in forming his ‘theory’.
So, here are the facts–Mike was a very sick man. Exactly a year ago, he underwent quintuple bypass surgery to relieve a 98% blockage in his arteries. After surgery, his heart operated at only around 25% of its capacity. In the 5 months he stayed with us, he had no less than half a dozen different heart ‘incidents’ that were more than likely heart attacks of some sort that on several occasions necessitated me taking him to the emergency room, one instance in particular occurring in the middle of the night during a blinding snow storm. In addition to this, he was in excruciating pain 24 hours a day from the neuropathy in his legs and feet, pain so severe that at times he found himself breathless and dizzy. Most days he stayed in bed because of the pain and when he did walk was only able to do so with a cane or had to brace himself against walls, sofas, chairs, etc, from point a to point b.
Adding to Mike’s physical misery was watching as slowly, bit by bit, people in this ‘movement’ surrendered their ability to think rationally in favor of indulging in baseless, self-gratifying sensationalism. Gordon Duff has been a significant contributor to this unfortunate development and his latest act of madness in stating that Mike was ‘murdered’ is just more of the same.
For those of us who loved Mike and loved his dedication to ‘sticking with the facts’ before jumping to baseless conclusions, we ask others please not to do injury to his memory by throwing gasoline on Duff’s latest act of sensationalist-based arson. Duff and those who propagate this type of yellow journalism do so not for reasons of serving the truth, but rather in generating increased web traffic and therefore higher revenues.
Post Script–having learned from experience that no matter how rational the response and no matter how well it is delivered that there are those who–addicted to all forms of conspiracyism–will ingest anything as long as it contains the right amount of intoxicant, and so we ask therefore that you answer for yourselves the following questions–Would you let Duff do your taxes for you, knowing that everything of personal value–including but not limited to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness–was on the line? Would you trust him with your life savings or your bank account or would you trust his advice on investments?
If your answer is ‘no’, then why would you give him (and others like him) the keys to the most valuable thing you have in your possession, i.e. your ability to think?
After all, a thief only steals your money which can be replaced, but decisions based on bad information can be permanent.
Putting that disinfo artist Gordon Duff in his place:
MCP would be proud…
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : False flags Template for terror
Year : 2013
An analytical critique of the covert model utilized by the conspirators who orchestred 9-11, the Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, Sandy Hook and Boston. […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Ye shall know the truth A critical survey of 101 « must » books american nationalists need to read and understand before « they » burn them Year : 2013 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_Ye_shall_know_the_truth.zip Dedication. To Lawrence […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The confessions of an anti-semite The first-ever critical analysis of the linguistic Legerdemain underlying the propaganda techniques of the new world order Year : 2011 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_confessions_of_an_anti-semite.zip The […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The Caiaphas complex An unsettling, unexpurgated exploration of the dark side of the power structure that misrules America and our world today… Year : 2012 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_Caiaphas_complex.zip A dedication by way of a foreword… […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The New Babylon Those who reign supreme A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious And Economic Origins of The New World Order Inside the Rothschild Empire : The modern Day Pharisees Year : 2009 Link download : […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The Golem A world held hostage Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb and the Road to Global Armageddon the case for dismantling our planet’s most dangerous arsenal of atomic weapons of mass destruction Year : 2002 Link download : […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The Judas Goats The Enemy Within The shocking story of the infiltration and subversion of the American nationalist movement Year : 2006 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_Judas_Goats_The_Enemy_Within.zip A very personal note […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The New Jerusalem Zionist Power In America Year : 2004 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_New_Jerusalem.zip The most thorough, straight-forward, factfilled, comprehensive overview of what is by far the most controversial topic […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The High Priests of War The Secret History of How America’s “Neo-Conservative” Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire Year : 2004 Link download : […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Dirty Secrets Crime, Conspiracy And Cover-Up During the 20th Century A Compendium of the Writings of Michael Collins Piper, Interviews with the Author and Reviews of His Works Year : 2005 Link download : […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Final Judgment The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy Year : 2004 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_Final_Judgment.zip Final Judgment is, beyond question, the most “controversial”—and certainly the most widely […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Best witness The Mel Mermelstein affair and the triumph of Historical revisionism
Year : 1994
Introduction by Mark Lane. For almost five decades I have attempted to set the record […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins Title : Coup d’Etat The bizarre inside story of how an intelligence operative tied to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad Orchestrated the take-over of the Institute for Historical Review and Set in Motion the Ultimate destruction of Liberty Lobby. How the IHR now operates as […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins Title : Al Capone : The man and the myth Year : 2013 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_Al_Capone.zip While flamboyant Italian-American Al Capone won all the headlines and the media attention through his exploits in Chicago, his real sponsors, New York-based […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins Title : Leon Degrelle : warrior for the West Year : 2012 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_Leon_Degrelle_warrior_for_the_West.zip Here is the inspiring het tragic story of an idealistic, indomitable and fearless leader survived the worst that World War II had to […]
Authors : Piper Michael Collins Title : The power behind Sarah Palin Some cold, hard facts that neither Sarah’s fans nor her critics understand Year : 2009 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_The_power_behind_Sarah_Palin.zip WHO’S REALLY BEHIND THE SARAH PALIN PHENOMENON? There’s more to the […]
Authors : Piper Michael Collins – Hoop Ken Title : A Mockery of Justice : The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 Year : 2011 Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_A_Mockery_of_Justice.zip According to historian Harry Elmer Barnes—this magazine’s namesake— who was one of FDR’s leading critics from the […]
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Michael Collins Piper’s speech to the Zayed Centre Exposing : Zionist influence on the American media
Year : 2003
The Speech That Sparked an International Controversy… What follows is the complete text of American Free Press correspondentMichael Collins Piper’s historicMarch 10, 2003 address to the Zayed International Centre for Coordination and Follow-Up, the Abu Dhabi-based think tank of the Arab League. Piper focused on the topic of the immense pro-Israel bias of the Americanmedia and of the significant influence and control of the media by wealthy and powerful families and financial institutions devoted to the pro- Israel cause. As noted in the supplementary material which follows the speech itself, Piper’s comments sparked an international controversy yet no one has thus forth stepped forward to refute his remarks or to dispute the factual basis on which his speech was founded. There is no copyright on this document. Please reproduce and distribute widely. …
Author : Piper Michael Collins
Title : The passion play at Oberammergau An historical introduction
Year : 2005
Had it not been for one particular event on a certain day some 2, 000 years ago, the bizarre and particularly brutal ancient Roman practice of crucifixion would have undoubtedly been forgotten. While perhaps millions died this way, it was the destruction of just one being upon the Cross that captured the attention of history. Although the crucifixion of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus The Christ, has been commemorated in countless illustrations and even film, Mel Gibson’s monumental The Passion of the Christ brought home the reality of our Lord’s last hours in a fashion unlike anything ever seen. Gibson’s film was not only a gigantic box-office smash in the United States-despite determined efforts to stop the film from being distributed-but it also was a major sensation, received favorably in all Muslim nations where Christ is revered as a prophet. In addition, when the film was screened for Christian audiences in Malaysia and in Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim republic, The Passion of the Christ received popular acclaim. …
Lawrence Dennis – The dynamics of war and revolution
A provocative analysis of America’s relation to European war influences in the light of the impact of world forces of revolution which the author here defines and describes
Lonnie Lawrence Dennis (December 25, 1893 – August 20, 1977) was an American diplomat, author, and a defendant in the Great Sedition Trial of 1944.
He advocated fascism in America after the Great Depression, arguing that capitalism was doomed. Dennis was born in Atlanta, Georgia. His father was a prominent White Atlanta lawyer and his mother was his father’s mulatto mistress. Dennis was raised by his mother’s family. At age five Dennis began preaching the gospel to audiences in Atlanta and later England. He was billed as « The Mulatto Boy Evangelist » and published a autobiography at age ten. He was later sent to Phillips Exeter Academy and then to Harvard.
During World War I, Dennis commanded a company of military police in France. He graduated from Harvard in 1920 and entered the foreign service.
The turning point of Dennis’ life came when he served in Nicaragua. He resigned from the foreign service in disgust at the US intervention there against the Sandino rebellion. He then became an adviser to the Latin American fund of the Seligman banking trust, but again made enemies when he wrote a series of exposes of their foreign bond enterprises in The New Republic and The Nation in 1930. These exposes propelled Dennis into a national public intellectual career, publishing his first book at the height of the depression in 1932, Is Capitalism Doomed ? The book submitted that capitalism was, and by all right should be, on its death knell, but warned of the grave dangers of a world devoid of its positive legacy. Dennis’ two later books detailed his sense of the system that was emerging to replace it, which he believed to be fascism. The Coming American Fascism in 1936, detailing the system’s substructure, and The Dynamics Of War And Revolution in 1940, on the superstructure.
The New Germany was impressed with his book on American Fascism and Dennis was invited to Nuremberg to attend the 1936 Party Congress.
Here Dennis met with party ideologist Alfred Rosenberg and Foreign Press Bureau chief Ernst Hanfstaengl.
Lawrence Dennis was an editor at The Awakener for some time. Later he founded his own publication, the Weekly Foreign Letter, and he wrote for Today’s Challenge, published by the pro-German American Fellowship Forum of George Sylvester Viereck and Friedrich Auhagen. He tried to enlist in the American Army during the Second World War, but the Army rejected him after the media ran stories about him.
Dennis was one of those indicted in the Great Sedition Trial of 1944 under the Smith Act which ended in a mistrial because the judge died of a heart attack. At the trial the prosecutor label Dennis the « Alfred Rosenberg » of the domestic fascist movement in America: supplying ideas to his fellow defendants. Dennis co-authored with Maximilian St. George an account of the trial, A Trial On Trial, in 1946, but put forth his own defense in court.
At the time of his indictment for sedition Dennis had a farm in Becket, Massachusetts.
In his later years Dennis continued to propagate his views through a modest newsletter, Appeal To Reason, which maintained a prominent circle of readers, including Herbert Hoover, Joseph P. Kennedy, William Appleman Williams, Harry Elmer Barnes, and James J. Martin. Dennis’ last book, Operational thinking for survival, was published in 1967.
MetapediaLawrence Dennis – The Coming American Fascism
Lawrence Dennis – PDF
Sur ce blog:
Michael Collins Piper contre la mafia juive
Mike Delaney à la défense d’Eric Hufschmid
La connexion Rupert Murdoch-Chris Bollyn-Eric Hufschmid
On the Subject of 9-11 Shills and Disinfo
Élucidation complète de la responsabilité d’Israël et ses services secrets dans l’orchestration du 11 septembre et sa récupération géopolitico-médiatique: 11 chapitres du livre FALSE FLAGS–Template for Terror de Michael Collins Piper
Entretien avec Michael Collins Piper sur son livre The New Babylon
The New Babylon: Extraits
Chèvres Judas actifs au sein du « mouvement »: Mark Glenn confronte Rense au sujet des articles de haine anti-islam publiés sur rense.com
Piper: L’escroc Mark Weber doit céder la direction de l’Institute for Historical Review – Mark Weber Must Resign from the IHR! (Les preuves que Mark Weber est un escroc)
Mise au point, avec l’aide de Michael Collins Piper, sur la désinfo qui circule sur Hitler, les nazis, le nouvel ordre mondial, Bilderberg, etc.
La secte de Jonestown (la mouvance Alex Jones)
Alex Jones: un saboteur à la tête du mouvement pour la vérité
« Rothschild du Nouveau Monde »: gibier de potence talmudiste, Edgar Bronfman Sr. en enfer. Son rôle dans la guerre en Irak et quelques autres de ses crimes moins connus, par Michael Collins Piper
Les médias cachent les liens de John McCain avec le crime organisé, par Michael Collins Piper
Oklahoma City: la connexion israélienne serait plus significative qu’on croit, par Michael Collins Piper
Les chèvres de Judas, par Michael Collins Piper
Des faux nationalistes: sionistes, autant anti-nazis qu’anti-Islam
L’ADL derrière le Patriot Act
Réfutation de la thèse d’Anthony Sutton selon laquelle « Wall Street a financé les Nazis », par James Pool et Ivor Benson
Bilderberg: organisation anti-nationaliste des Rothschild
Wikileaks révèle que Bilderberg craint le nationalisme… mais Infowars s’entête à répéter que Bilderberg a été fondé par des nazis!
Rockefeller, Rothschild, Bush et Hitler, par Michael Collins Piper
Du mythe des nazis pantins de la ploutocratie, par Michael Collins Piper
La montée du pouvoir financier juif Rothschild, par Michael Collins Piper
Les grandes fortunes familiales qui contrôlent la finance et les affaires (trombinoscope) par Michael Collins Piper
Des usuriers babyloniens à l’empire Rothschild, par Michael Collins Piper
La connexion secrète entre la Première Guerre mondiale et la Déclaration Balfour (extrait de The New Babylon, de Michael Collins Piper)
Les intérêts Rothschild derrière Donald Trump, par Michael Collins Piper
L’empire mondial anglo rêvé par Rhodes: marionnette des Rothschild, par Michael Collins Piper
Rothschild et JFK: les liens de l’avocat « montréalais » Bloomfield (à la tête de Permindex) avec le clan Rothschild documentés par un auteur québécois, par Michael Collins Piper
The Confessions of an Anti-Semite, par Michael Collins Piper
« There Will Be A Hot Time In The Old Town Tonight! » Un projet de film de Michael Collins Piper, en réponse à l’abject « Inglourious Basterds » de Tarantino
Le mouvement juif Néo-conservateur : du trotskisme au bellicisme sioniste
Grands prêtres de guerre: la guerre en Irak comme tremplin des néocons vers la domination mondiale, par Michael Collins Piper
LA JUDÉE DÉCLARE LA GUERRE À RON PAUL … JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON RON PAUL
Rand Paul se distancie des idées de son père, se rapproche des juifs et reçoit l’appui de l’establishment républicain et des médias
Les pires salauds sionistes se sont ligués contre Obama
Deux listes d’antisémites, par Michael Collins Piper
Les nationalistes Staline et Poutine contre le mondialisme des trotskistes et des financiers
Le livre de Michael Collins Piper est le seul et unique ouvrage conspirationniste mentionné dans la seule et unique compilation des correspondances de JFK. La piste israélienne n’est plus ignorée dans les ouvrages de référence sur JFK, panique des néocons dans les médias (National Review, Washington Free Beacon) – Extrait de la fin du livre « The Letters of John F. Kennedy »
Assassinat de JFK: les cas de Robert Groden, Jim Marrs et Peter Dale Scott (2010)
Assassinat de JFK: rien à voir avec le décret 11110 et la Réserve Fédérale, par Michael Collins Piper
Assassinat de JFK: c’était pas des nazis! par Michael Collins Piper
La connexion israélienne: la seule à réunir toutes les pièces du puzzle de l’assassinat de JFK, par Michael Collins Piper
Assassinat de JFK: une décision de l’administration Ben-Gourion, par Michael Colllins Piper
Assassinat de JFK: voyez la section photo du livre Final Judgment de Michael Collins Piper
L’arsenal nucléaire israélien au centre de la guerre secrète entre JFK et Israël, par Mark Dankof, Paul Findley et Michael Collins Piper
Michael Collins Piper: Le groupe Stern (Lehi) a tenté d’assassiner le président Truman; selon Victor Ostrovsky le Mossad a déjà tenté de tuer le président George Bush, qui disait « Je ne suis qu’un petit homme isolé qui se bat contre la puissance politique d’un millier de lobbyistes du Capitole »
Le conseiller-stratégiste clé de Palin est une figure importante au sein d’une organisation tentaculaire, par Michael Collins Piper
Les néocons derrière Sarah Palin
Michele Bachmann est comme Sarah Palin: plus sioniste que les sionistes
Tuerie de Columbine: c’était pas des nazis!
À quand une nuit de cristal pour démanteler ce réseau d’espionnage sioniste international?
L’affaire Lavon et le USS Liberty: Israël a une histoire d’attentats sous fausse bannière
Théories de conspiration: Ahad Ha’am (Asher Ginzberg) est-il vraiment le père des Protocoles? par Michael Collins Piper
Michael Collins Piper contre Eric Jon Phelps sur la théorie du complot sioniste jésuitique
Flashback: Kadhafi dénonce le rôle central d’Israël dans l’assassinat de JFK
Le sionisme contre l’ONU (extrait de Dirty Tricks de Michael Collins Piper)
The Bell Curve (1994): bestseller du suprématisme juif
Rappel: silence médiatique sur la piste pro-israélienne dans les attentats terroristes à l’Anthrax aux USA, juste après le trauma du 11 septembre. Tout en ravivant le trauma, il fallait faire croire que c’était des musulmans…
Surprise durant la semaine de l’anniversaire de l’assassinat de JFK: Arnon Milchan, producteur juif d’Hollywood, a confirmé ce que nous savions en avouant publiquement avoir été à l’emploi du Mossad dans le cadre du développement du programme nucléaire d’Israël…
11 septembre: les détails techniques ne sont que des détails, il importe bien plus de savoir qui sont les ultimes responsables et pourquoi ils l’ont fait. Et c’était pas les nazis!
Les pirates de l’air du 9-11 étaient-ils vraiment arabes? Peut-être pas. Were the 9-1 Hijackers Really Arabs? Maybe Not… by Michael Collins Piper
L’Option Samson comme justice ultime, par Michael Collins Piper
Guerres sionistes et Option Samson: vers la délivrance ultime
Ça commence à sentir la fin…
Comme après chaque grosse tuerie aux États-Unis, les ventes d’armes à feu explosent… devinez qui s’en met plein les poches (à part les médias juifs – pardonnez le pléonasme)? S’ils vont en enfer, ils nous y entraînent avec eux
Le premier État juif, le Birobijan
Chroniques de la bête immonde: l’extrémiste François Genoud
Jim Traficant, Demjanjuk and Israel